Trauma of the Nervous System: Basic Neuroscience of Neurotrauma

Published on 12/04/2015 by admin

Filed under Neurology

Last modified 12/04/2015

Print this page

rate 1 star rate 2 star rate 3 star rate 4 star rate 5 star
Your rating: none, Average: 0 (0 votes)

This article have been viewed 1437 times

Chapter 50A Trauma of the Nervous System

Basic Neuroscience of Neurotrauma

Traumatic brain injury (TBI) is a leading cause of death and disability among children and young adults. In addition, head injury in older adults as a result of falls is a growing clinical concern. To investigate the pathophysiology of brain injury and to develop novel therapeutic strategies to treat this condition, experimental models of TBI have been established. Although no experimental model completely mimics the human condition, individual models produce many features of human brain injury. Based on these models, therapeutic strategies directed at specific pathomechanisms have been initiated. This chapter reviews the basic science of neurotrauma and summarizes the various experimental strategies used to investigate and treat TBI.

Experimental Models of Traumatic Brain Injury

Severe closed-head injury produces a range of cerebral lesions that may be divided into four general categories: (1) diffuse axonal injury, (2) vascular lesions including subdural hematoma, (3) contusion, and (4) neuronal degeneration in selectively vulnerable regions. In a recent review of animal models of head injury, Cernak (2005) classified models of head injury according to the biomechanics of the injury. Fluid percussion and controlled cortical impact models are characterized as a constrained direct brain deformation injury model, whereas inertial injury models and impact acceleration models are considered unconstrained in head movement and more closely mimic human TBI. Other models have specifically targeted brain trauma that occurs in combat situations. These include high-velocity penetrating and blast injury. In an attempt to investigate the effects of mechanical deformation on specific cell types, in vitro models of stretch-induced injury have also been developed.

Percussion Concussion

The fluid percussion (FP) injury model produces a brief (22 msec) deformation of the exposed cortex. A craniotomy is performed, and a plastic modified Luer-Lok injury tube is attached to the exposed dura and sealed. A Plexiglas cylinder filled with sterile saline is attached to the injury tube via a metal fitting. A pendulum is released on the other end and at impact produces a pressure wave that results in a bolus injection of saline onto the exposed dura. By varying the distance of the pendulum swing, injury severity—mild (1.1-1.3 atm), moderate (2.0-2.3 atm), and severe (2.4-2.6 atm)—can be studied in a reproducible fashion. This is an important model characteristic because of the heterogeneous nature of human TBI and the possibility that treatment strategies may vary with injury severity. The central, lateral, and parasagittal FP models are characterized by brief behavioral responsiveness (e.g., coma), metabolic alterations, changes in local cerebral blood flow and blood-brain barrier (BBB) permeability, and behavioral deficits. The central FP model tends to have variable and small contusions in the vicinity of the fluid pulse, and scattered axonal damage mostly limited to the brainstem. In contrast, lateral and parasagittal FP is characterized by a lateral cortical contusion that is remote from the impact site. Evidence of axonal damage is seen throughout the white matter tracts in the ipsilateral cerebral hemisphere, and tissue tears are seen at gray matter/white matter interfaces. Hippocampal damage is pronounced in the lateral and parasagittal FP injury models, with little brainstem damage. The FP injury model thus produces a range of disorders including contusion, widespread axonal injury, and selective neuronal necrosis.

Another commonly used rodent TBI model is controlled cortical impact injury. In this model, a bone flap is removed, and the impact device is vertically driven into the cerebral cortex to produce tissue displacement. This model produces a well-demarcated cortical contusion with variable degrees of hippocampal involvement dependent on velocity and deformation depth. An advantage of the controlled cortical impact model is that it can be used in mice and allows the testing of genetically altered mice to help determine the cause-and-effect relationships between gene expression and cell injury.

Acceleration Concussion

Inertial acceleration models can produce pure acute subdural hematomas and diffuse axonal injury. These models accelerate the head of the animal in one plane, followed by a rapid deceleration, resulting in movement of the brain within the cranial cavity. The inertial acceleration models are designed to mimic motor vehicle accidents. Tissue tear hemorrhages occur in the central white matter, and gliding contusions occur in the parasagittal gray matter/white matter junctions. These models are characterized by a variable period of coma and axonal damage in the upper brainstem and cerebellum. For the impact acceleration model, the animal is placed on a foam bed with a metal disk attached to the exposed skull, and a weight is dropped from a specified height to produce brain injury. This model also produces prolonged coma and widespread axonal damage. However, these models are characterized by variable and somewhat uncontrolled skull fractures.

Human head injury is never as pure as an experimental model, and the total human injury condition may not be addressed adequately with a single animal model. Therefore, the use of complicated models in assessing pathomechanisms after TBI can provide valuable data (Statler et al., 2001). Many of these studies have added secondary insults such as hypotension (shock), hypoxia, or hyperthermia after the primary injury to more adequately mimic human head trauma. However, this added component to the model can result in complex data interpretation. Thus, once a particular feature of human brain injury is produced in an experimental model, the pathogenesis of the injury can be critically investigated.

Military Models

The incidence of brain injury is currently estimated to be as high as 40% to 70% of combat casualties. Advancements in protective body armor have limited the number of high-velocity impact injuries to the brain, but the use of improvised explosive devices has caused blast injury to become more prevalent. Military-relevant models have only recently been developed, and much work is needed to fully explore pathomechanisms induced by these models. Two models of significance are the penetrating ballistic brain injury model and a blast injury model using a metal tube with a small amount of plastic explosives at one end. The penetrating brain injury (PBI) model mimics a bullet wound by expanding and contracting a balloon that has been inserted into the brain (Williams et al., 2005). Injury severity and placement of the probe can be varied so that different types of bullet injuries can be studied. PBI produces robust histopathological damage and increases in intracranial pressure (ICP) and hemorrhage. In addition, sensorimotor deficits are observed in this model, along with seizure activity. Blast injury models have been developed that can mimic whole-body blast or local blast injury (Cernak and Noble-Haeusslein, 2010). This type of trauma produces cognitive deficits, with ultrastructural and oxidative damage to the hippocampus. Axonal damage is also present, as indicated by increases in phosphorylated neurofilament proteins. These military-relevant injury models have the potential to provide valuable information for managing and treating combat casualties.

In Vitro Models

A shortcoming of animal models is that they preclude a critical assessment of individual cell responses to trauma. In animal experiments, for example, the cellular response to injury may be a consequence of both primary and secondary events initiated by a complex cascade of cellular interactions. To critically investigate the consequences of injury on a specific cell type in the absence of confounding cellular and systemic factors, several in vitro cell culture models have been developed. Models range from scratching the culture with a pipette tip to inducing cellular deformation by stretching cultured cells.

Using these approaches, investigators have found that trauma induces a wide range of primary cellular alterations. Astrocytic responses include hyperplasia, hypertrophy, and increased glial fibrillary acidic protein content. Increases in intracellular calcium occur, which are blocked by specific receptor antagonists. Traumatized astrocytes also produce interleukins and neurotrophic factors. Neonatal cortical neurons that are stretched undergo delayed depolarization that depends on the activation of specific receptor populations. Combined mechanical trauma and metabolic impairment in vivo also induces N-methyl-d-aspartate receptor–dependent neuronal cell death and caspase-3–dependent apoptosis. In vitro experimental approaches provide novel data concerning intracellular signaling cascades, mechanisms underlying cellular responses to trauma, and the role of specific cell types in the pathophysiology of brain trauma (Chen et al., 2009; LaPlaca et al., 2009).

Neuronal Damage After Traumatic Brain Injury

Temporal Patterns of Neuronal Death

The neuropathological sequelae of experimental and human TBI have been well described (Bramlett and Dietrich, 2004; Povlishock and Katz, 2005). In experimental TBI, temporal patterns of neuronal damage have also been characterized. As early as 6 hours after cortical contusion injury, the contused tissue appears edematous, and pyknotic neurons are apparent at the injury site. By 8 days, a cortical cavity has developed that is surrounded by a border containing necrotic tissue, a glial scar, or both. The temporal profile of neuronal damage after parasagittal FP brain injury has also been assessed with light and electron microscopy. As early as 1 hour after impact, dark shrunken neurons indicative of irreversible damage are seen in cortical layers overlying the gliding contusion that displays BBB breakdown to protein tracers. Ultrastructural studies demonstrate that early BBB dysfunction results from mechanical damage of small venules in vulnerable regions including the external capsule. In some brain regions, focal sites of acute neuronal damage are associated with extravasated protein, whereas neuronal damage in other regions appears to occur without overt BBB breakdown. Astrocytic swelling is observed early after injury, with increased glial fibrillary acidic protein immunoreactivity apparent at later times in areas, demonstrating histopathological damage (Fig. 50A.1). In terms of neuroprotection, the acuteness of this damage limits the potential for therapeutic interventions directed against the early neuronal and glial response to TBI.

More subacute patterns of neuronal injury have been documented in various TBI models. At 3 days after moderate parasagittal FP brain injury, scattered necrotic neurons are present throughout the frontoparietal cerebral cortex remote from the impact site (Fig. 50A.2). In addition, selective neuronal damage is seen in the CA3 and CA4 hippocampal subsectors, the dentate hilus, and lateral thalamus ipsilateral to the trauma. These patterns of selective neuronal damage are associated with a well-demarcated contusion overlying the lateral external capsule. Ultrastructural changes consistent with apoptosis have been described after TBI, so delayed patterns of neuronal cell death may involve necrotic and programmed cell death processes.

Selective Neuronal Vulnerability

Damage to the hippocampus is commonly reported in autopsy studies of head-injured patients. Clinical and experimental studies describe cognitive abnormalities thought to be associated with hippocampal dysfunction. In an acceleration model of brain injury in nonhuman primates, CA1 hippocampal histopathological damage was reported in the majority of animals. CA1 damage was not produced by secondary global ischemia, elevated ICP, or seizure activity alone. In this regard, CA1 hippocampal damage is not routinely reported in other TBI models, including cortical contusion and moderate FP injury. However, midline FP injury followed by a delayed sublethal global ischemic insult leads to CA1 neuronal damage. The studies indicate the importance of injury severity on outcome and the vulnerability of the posttraumatic brain to secondary insults. Finally, the dentate gyrus, bilateral dentate hilus, and CA3 hippocampus have also been reported to be selectively damaged in FP models.

Thalamic damage after brain injury is described in clinical and experimental studies. In human brain injury, the loss of inhibitory thalamic reticular neurons is proposed to underlie some forms of attention deficits. In radiographic studies of patients with TBI using magnetic resonance imaging, relationships between injury severity, lesion volume, ventricle-to-brain ratio, and thalamic volume have been reported. Patients with moderate to severe injuries have smaller thalamic volumes and greater ventricle-to-brain ratios than patients with mild to moderate injuries. Decreased thalamic volumes suggest that subcortical brain structures may be susceptible to transneuronal degeneration after cortical damage. Focal damage to thalamic nuclei seen after long-term FP injury may result from progressive circuit degeneration after axonal damage, neuronal cell death, or lack of neurotrophic delivery.

Progressive Damage

Only recently has the progressive nature of the histopathological consequences of TBI been appreciated (Bramlett and Dietrich, 2007). At 2 months after moderate parasagittal FP injury, significant atrophy of the cerebral cortex, hippocampus, and thalamus is apparent in histological sections (Fig. 50A.3, A). Progressive tissue loss in the cortex and hippocampus at various times up to 1 year after lateral FP injury have been reported. Similar findings have been found in a model of controlled cortical impact injury. At 3 weeks and 1 year after injury, analysis demonstrated a significant hemispheric volume loss and expansion of the ipsilateral lateral ventricle. Thus atrophy of gray matter structures is associated with significant enlargement of the lateral ventricle.

Ventricular expansion not associated with hydrocephalus or increased ICP is felt to be a sensitive indicator of structural damage and an indirect measure of white matter atrophy. Indeed, ventricular size has been correlated with memory disturbances; patients with the highest ventricular volumes demonstrated significantly lower memory scores. Recent findings provide direct evidence of progressive white matter damage after FP brain injury (Bramlett and Dietrich, 2007). At 1 year after TBI, severe atrophy of specific tracts including the external capsule and cerebral peduncle was documented (see Fig. 50A.3, B). The importance of a progressive injury cascade after TBI in terms of other neurological conditions merits consideration. For example, if mild head trauma leads to a progressive reduction in neuronal reserve, would the person who sustained such trauma be more susceptible than others to neurodegenerative processes associated with aging? Some epidemiologic studies have indeed indicated that a history of brain trauma is a risk factor for Alzheimer disease.

Secondary and Repetitive Damage

Buy Membership for Neurology Category to continue reading. Learn more here