Thorascopic Spine Surgery

Published on 26/03/2015 by admin

Filed under Neurosurgery

Last modified 22/04/2025

Print this page

rate 1 star rate 2 star rate 3 star rate 4 star rate 5 star
Your rating: none, Average: 0 (0 votes)

This article have been viewed 1445 times

CHAPTER 31 Thorascopic Spine Surgery

The applications of endoscopic spine surgery have been expanded since the first publications spanning nearly two decades.16 Operating techniques have been standardized and unified and today are safe procedures with low complication rates that are comparable to those of open procedures, presuming the existence of adequate training and manual skills of the surgeon.7 Thus, endoscopic operations on the spinal column no longer represent exceptional interventions but have become standard procedures in spine surgery. Thoracoscopic techniques can be used to approach the anterior column of the spine in the area between the third thoracic vertebra and the third lumbar vertebra because endoscopic splitting of the diaphragm also allows the exposure of the upper sections of the lumbar spine. The application potential includes anterior release procedures, with incision and resection of ligaments and intervertebral disks; removal of fragmented disks or sections of vertebrae, including anterior decompression of the spinal canal; replacement of vertebral bodies with biologic or alloplastic materials; and ventral stabilization procedures with implants designed for use in endoscopic spine surgery. In addition, percutaneous endoscopic techniques are used for minimally invasive treatment of degenerative disk disease of the thoracic and lumbar spine.

Technical Requirements

Instruments

image Complete sets of instruments for soft tissue and bone preparation are manufactured by contemporary instrument manufacturers (Fig. 31-2). Instruments should have a nonreflective surface and a depth scale on both sides and be ergonomically designed with big handles for safe control and handling. The technique by which they are used is called the three-point anchoring technique, which means that every sharp and potentially dangerous instrument is guided by both hands; one hand is based on the chest wall, always controlling and sometimes neutralizing unexpected forces and movements of the instrument (see Video 31-9).

Preoperative Requirements

Marking the Portals

imageAs a routine, four portals are used: scope portal, working portal, suction-irrigation portal, and retractor portal (Video 31-2). Their location and, in particular, the position of the working portal are crucial for the endoscopic operation to proceed in the optimal fashion. For this reason, the lesion is first displayed in the lateral projection (with reference to the patient’s body) under precise adjustment of the image intensifier, and a marker is used to draw the injured spinal section onto the lateral thoracic wall (Fig. 31-4). The working portal is drawn in directly above the lesion. The trocar for the endoscope is marked either caudal or cranial to the working portal, depending on the height of the lesion, and following the axis of the spine. The distance from the working portal is approximately two intercostal spaces. The entry points for suction and irrigation and for the retractor are then located ventral from these portals.

imageAfter skin disinfection and sterile draping, single-lung ventilation is begun in consultation with the anesthetist. As the first approach, the portal in the farthest cranial position is always selected because the risk of injury to the liver, spleen, and diaphragm is comparatively minor in this position. The approach is made by the mini-thoracotomy technique, providing the possibility of examining the immediate surroundings of the insertion site with the fingers before the trocar is introduced (Video 31-3). The rigid 30-degree endoscope is then carefully inserted, and the thoracic cavity is first inspected to rule out the existence of adhesions or parenchymal lesions. The other three trocars and then the instruments are subsequently introduced under endoscopic control.

Operative Techniques

Approach to the Thoracolumbar Junction

imageThis operation is also performed using single-lung ventilation (Video 31-4).8,11,15,16 Here, too, the approach side is decided by the location of the major vessels, which can be identified from the preoperative computed tomographic scan. In most cases, the best approach to the thoracolumbar junction is from the left. Placement of the trocars and instruments is illustrated in Figure 31-5.

As a first step, the affected section of the spine is drawn onto the skin of the lateral abdominal and thoracic wall under image intensifier control. Careful attention is paid to correct projection of the vertebrae, whose end plates and anterior and posterior margins should be displayed in the central beam, in sharp focus with no double contour. This marking is taken as the sole reference for subsequent placement of the portals.

The working portal is situated directly above the lesion; the portal for the endoscope is located over the spine two or three intercostal spaces away from the working portal in a cranial direction. The portals for the retractor and the suction-irrigation instrument are situated ventrally from this point.

The dome-like diaphragm is firmly connected at its margins with the sternum, ribs, and spine and arches up into the thoracic cavity. Topographically speaking, the attachment sites of the diaphragm to the spine are at the level of the first lumbar vertebra, whereas the lowest point of the thoracic cavity projects with the phrenicocostal sinus at the level of the baseplate of the second lumbar vertebra (Fig. 31-6). This makes it possible to place a trocar intrathoracically in the phrenicocostal sinus, which, after incision of the diaphragm attachment to the spine, provides access to the retroperitoneal section of the thoracolumbar junction down to the baseplate of the second lumbar vertebra. This requires a 4- to 5-cm–long incision following the attachment of the diaphragm; access to the L1-2 intervertebral disk can be obtained with a shorter incision of 2 to 3 cm (Fig. 31-7).1517

To prevent a postoperative diaphragmatic hernia, an incision that runs parallel to the diaphragmatic attachment is preferred. Because of the dome-like architecture of the diaphragm, an increase in intra-abdominal pressure from a semicircular incision parallel to the attachment causes the resected margins to come together and to adhere spontaneously, whereas a radial incision in direct proximity to the orifices of the aorta and the esophagus weakens the diaphragm fixation and causes the resected margins to gape. In addition, it is recommended that every incision in the attachment longer than 2 cm be sutured endoscopically to prevent hernia formation.

Endoscopic Treatment of Spinal Trauma (Anterior Reconstruction)

Cannulated Screw Insertion

imageThe K wires are now overdrilled with a cannulated broach, and the lateral cortex of the vertebral body is opened (Video 31-7). The working trocar is exchanged for a speculum through a switching stick, and the clamping element is tightened with a screw. The length of the screw has been previously measured against the preoperative computed tomographic scan and subsequently defines whether a monocortical or bicortical screw fixation is to be attempted. The direction of the screw can be altered after removal of the K wire and checked in both planes under C-arm monitoring. The connecting line between the screws and the anterior boundary of the clamping elements now defines an area of safety within which the partial removal of the vertebral body and the disks is performed. The ventral and dorsal extent of the partial corpectomy thus defined also then corresponds to the dimensions of the planned vertebral body replacement, which has a transverse diameter between 16 mm (thoracic) and 20 mm (lumbar).

image imageThe intervertebral disks are incised laterally with a knife, and the disk space is opened with a slightly offset osteotome (Video 31-8). The posterior osteotomy is then performed with a straight osteotome from disk space to disk space on the connecting line between the screws. The scale on the osteotome shows the corresponding depth, which in the anterior direction should be about two thirds of the diameter of the vertebra. The line of the anterior osteotomy runs along the anterior boundary of the clamping elements; to be sure of avoiding unintentional perforation of the anterior vertebral wall (and adjacent vessels), an osteotome that is slightly angled to the rear is used. The central section of the vertebral body is now removed with a rongeur, and the removed cancellous bone is preserved for later implantation adjacent to the vertebral body replacement (Video 31-9). Using a curet and rongeurs, the intervertebral disks are then resected and the end plates are freshened up. When titanium cages are implanted, any weakening of the load-bearing end plates must be avoided. In monosegmental fusion with a tricortical pelvic crest graft, the subchondral bone lamella on the cranial end plate is removed to assist healing of the bone graft.

Insertion of the Bone Graft

imageIn monosegmental reconstructions and fusion, a tricortical bone graft taken from the iliac crest is used. After the corpectomy defect has been measured, the iliac crest is prepared and exposed. Using an oscillating saw and chisel, the bone graft is harvested and firmly connected to a graft holder. The graft is inserted in a centered position into the defect, which has to be fluoroscopically checked in both planes (Video 31-10).

For vertebral body replacement in a bisegmental reconstruction, I mostly use the hydraulically working Hydrolift (Aesculap, Center Valley, PA) with continuously variable distraction and adaptation of the end plates. Before the vertebra replacement is implanted, the extent and clean preparation of the implant site in the anterior sagittal direction and in its depth should be verified by palpation with a probe hook under image intensifier control.

Two Langenbeck hooks are inserted into the incision for the working portals, and the incision is widened slightly. The vertebral body replacement is then gradually introduced through the chest wall into the thoracic cavity and positioned over the defect in the vertebral body with a holder. Once again, it is determined that no soft tissue, in particular the ligated segment vessels, has slipped between the corpectomy defect and the vertebral body replacement. The vertebral body replacement device is then implanted into the planned central position in the vertebral body and distracted. The implant is surrounded with the cancellous bone harvested from the partial corpectomy. An antibiotic medium (e.g., gentamicin-collagen) can be added to the spongiosa. After the corpectomy defect zone has been filled with spongiosa, it is covered with a fibrin fleece.

Special Indications

Removal of Posterior Wall Fragments: Endoscopic Anterior Decompression9

Depending on the level of stenosis, compression of the spinal canal can lead to a neurological deficit. The spectrum of injuries to the spinal canal, medullary cone, and cauda equina ranges from simple contusion to complete tearing of the neural structures. As long as the structures have not been severed, recovery of function and sensory deficits may be possible in principle. Thus, the indications for anterior decompression are present when significant narrowing and a neurological deficit remain after primary dorsal reduction and stabilization.

Operative Technique

Completion of the partial corpectomy and adjacent diskectomies is recommended before the canal decompression. The next step is to identify the pedicle of the fractured vertebral body. In traumatic burst fracture, the pedicles are nearly always preserved, and the retropulsed fragment usually is located medial to the pedicle. Thus, the retropulsed fragment is trapped between the two pedicles and is difficult to remove or reduce.

Therefore, resection of the ipsilateral pedicle with a punch is recommended before removal of the retropulsed fragment is attempted. For this reason, resection of the ipsilateral pedicle has a dual importance: it exposes the spinal canal, and it frees the retropulsed fragment from the pincer grip of the pedicles. A Cobb elevator is used to expose the ipsilateral pedicle subperiosteally and to push away the nerve root dorsally without having separated the root from the surrounding soft tissue. The inferior margin of the pedicle is identified with a nerve hook, and the pedicle is transected with a punch, which can be facilitated by thinning the pedicle with a high-speed bur beforehand. Removal of the dorsocranial section of the vertebral body together with the base of the pedicle exposes the posterior margin fragment and brings the dura into view. The compressing fragment can now be lifted off the dura under direct view, mobilized in the direction of the partial corpectomy, and resected. A nerve hook is used under image intensifier control to document the completeness of the posterior margin fragment resection in both planes. In cases with posterior wall resection, an expandable titanium cage is used as a vertebral body replacement because of its greater primary stability and the smaller risk for dislocation. The operation concludes with the ventral instrumentation and suturing of the diaphragm attachment.

Removal of Protruded Herniated Disk: Endoscopic Treatment of Degenerative Disk Disease

Only 0.15% to 1% of all operative procedures due to degenerative disk disease are done to treat thoracic disk protrusion.1820 As a specialty of the thoracic region, there is a “calcified disk” and an “intradural disk herniation” (Fig. 31-12). These removal procedures are technically demanding. Because of a smaller diameter of the thoracic spinal canal in conjunction with a spinal cord of bigger volume at these levels, there is little space to accommodate disk herniation. In consequence, small disk protrusions might cause significant symptoms. Depending on the localization and expansion of herniation—medial, mediolateral, intraforaminal, or extraforaminal—typical symptoms of thoracic disk herniation can be described.

Operating Room Setup

Confirmation of the Operative Site

Verification of the level of disease can be demanding before the main procedure is started. Several methods are recommended to ensure that the right intervertebral disk space is addressed. Dickman and Rosenthal12 recommend a preoperative radiograph of the chest to localize the level. Large osteophytes seen on computed tomographic scans or plain radiographs can be used as surgical or radiographic landmarks. After the endoscopic procedure has started, it is recommended that the ribs be counted with use of the C-arm, beginning caudally at the 12th rib. Rib identification should be repeated several times to ensure accuracy. The pleura over the identified rib head is then cauterized. Attention must be paid to the patient with an abnormal number of ribs, because the spinal level could be misidentified.

Marking the level of interest by percutaneous placement of a tiny metallic marker that is CT guided simultaneously with to the preoperative CT scan might be the most accurate way to identify easily and reproducibly the correct level during the operative procedure (Meic H. Schmidt, University of Utah, personal communication).

Operative Technique

The general principle of the procedure is to resect the rib head of the adjacent rib and expose the pedicle and the affected intervertebral disk (Fig. 31-14). A block-shaped defect will then be created in the adjacent vertebral bodies for removal of soft and calcified disk material away from the dura into the defect. Afterward, the rib head, which usually fits into the defect, is used for a monosegmental fusion procedure to be accomplished by ventral instrumentation.

Technical and Operative Details

A lateral fluoroscopic picture is obtained to determine the level of disease and the position of the four portals. The working portal is outlined directly over the affected intervertebral space. After the approach has been made and all portals are put in the right position, the spine is exposed by retraction of the lung with the fan-shaped retractor. The pleura over the identified and confirmed rib head is cauterized.

At this point, K wires are inserted (C-arm guided) according to the implant system that is used for stabilization and fusion afterward as landmarks into the vertebral bodies above and below the level selected for diskectomy. However, the procedure includes partial removal of the disk combined with a more or less extended bony defect at the adjacent vertebral bodies; distinct instability can be expected. Therefore, a monosegmental fusion with anterior instrumentation is advised.

After trap-door incision of the pleura over the identified disk space and the adjacent one, the segmental vessels of at least the lower adjacent vertebra are prepared, ligated with clips, and transected. If mobilization of the aorta is needed, the segmental vessels are ligated and dissected at multiple levels. The capsular and ligamentous structures of the rib head are cut with a Cobb elevator, and the rib head is mobilized. Following the course of the proximal rib, the pleura is opened over the rib, and the proximal 2 cm of the rib is resected. The rib head is preserved and used as bone graft for later fusion. The pedicle can now be exposed, identifying the neuroforamen above and below.

Partial corpectomy is performed with a high-speed diamond bur or an osteotome, creating a well-defined, block-shaped central defect involving the upper and lower thirds of the adjacent vertebral bodies. Initially, the posterior vertebral body wall is preserved (Fig. 31-15).

Once the base of the pedicle caudal to the intervertebral disk space is identified, the thickness can be reduced with a diamond bur to weaken the pedicle and to facilitate the transection with Kerrison rongeurs. Dickman12 recommends starting at the upper rim of the pedicle because of less bleeding from the epidural venous plexus. Under direct endoscopic view of the dura, the posterior wall is then dissected off the dura and carefully pushed into the corpectomy site or thinned out with a high-speed diamond bur. The sequestered part of the disk is then removed with dissectors and rongeurs. If there is an intradural calcified herniated disk, the intradural part of the sequestrated disk has to be carefully separated from the arachnoid mater with microdissection (Fig. 31-16). Even if this is not possible without tearing the dura, the base of the calcified disk can be thinned with the diamond bur, leaving only a shell of calcification attached to the dura free to move without bone or soft tissue impingement. Complete decompression of the dural sac across the vertebral body to the level of the contralateral pedicle is confirmed by direct endoscopic view and radiologically by fluoroscopy with use of a nerve hook in an anteroposterior projection. After decompression, the dura is covered with Gelfoam. The corpectomy defect is reconstructed with the rib head harvested at the first step. The size of the graft is determined with an endoscopic measurement of the defect.

I routinely perform a monosegmental endoscopic anterior fixation with a constrained screw-plate system to achieve a solid bony fusion of the segment.

Suggested Readings

Alberico AM, Sahni KS, Hall JAJr, et al. High thoracic disc herniation. Neurosurgery. 1986;19:449-451.

Albrand OW, Corkill G. Thoracic disc herniation. Treatment and prognosis. Spine. 1979;4:41-46.

Awwad EE, Martin DS, Smith KRJr, et al. Asymptomatic versus symptomatic herniated thoracic discs: their frequency and characteristics as detected by computed tomography after myelography. Neurosurgery. 1991;28:180-186.

Beisse R. Video-assisted techniques in the management of thoracolumbar fractures. Orthop Clin North Am. 2007;38:419-429.

Beisse R. Endoscopic surgery on the thoracolumbar junction of the spine. Eur Spine J. 2006;15:687-704.

Beisse R, Muckley T, Schmidt MH, et al. Surgical technique and results of endoscopic anterior spinal canal decompression. J Neurosurg Spine. 2005;2:128-136.

Beisse R, Potulski M, Beger J, et al. Development and clinical application of a thoracoscopic implantable frame plate for the treatment of thoracolumbar fractures and instabilities. Orthopäde. 2002;31:413-422.

Beisse R, Potulski M, Bühren V. Endoscopic techniques for the management of spinal trauma. Eur J Trauma. 2001;27:275-291.

Beisse R, Potulski M, Temme C, et al. [Endoscopically controlled division of the diaphragm. A minimally invasive approach to ventral management of thoracolumbar fractures of the spine.]. Unfallchirurg. 1998;101:619-627.

Beisse R, Trapp O. Thoracoscopic management of spinal trauma. Oper Tech Neurosurg. 2006;8:205-213.

Dickman CA, Rosenthal DJ, Perin NI. Thoracoscopic Spine Surgery. New York: Thieme; 1999.

Horowitz MB, Moossy JJ, Julian T, et al. Thoracic discectomy using video assisted thoracoscopy. Spine. 1994;19:1082-1086.

Kim DH, Jahng TA, Balabhadra RS, et al. Thoracoscopic transdiaphragmatic approach to thoracolumbar junction fractures. Spine J. 2004;4:317-328.

Knop C, Bastian L, Lange U, et al. Complications in surgical treatment of thoracolumbar injuries. Eur Spine J. 2002;11:214-226.

Knop C, Lange U, Bastian L, et al. Biomechanical compression tests with a new implant for thoracolumbar vertebral body replacement. Eur Spine J. 2001;10:30-37.

Le Roux PD, Haglund MM, Harris AB. Thoracic disc disease: experience with the transpedicular approach in twenty consecutive patients. Neurosurgery. 1993;33:58-66.

Mack MJ, Aronoff RJ, Acuff TE, et al. Present role of thoracoscopy in the diagnosis and treatment of diseases of the chest. Ann Thorac Surg. 1992;54:403-408.

Mack MJ, Regan J, Bobechko WP, et al. Applications of thoracoscopy for diseases of spine. Ann Thorac Surg. 1993;56:736-738.

Maiman DJ, Larson SJ, Luck E, et al. Lateral extracavitary approach to the spine for thoracic disc herniation: report of 23 cases. Neurosurgery. 1984;14:178-182.

McAfee PC, Regan JR, Zdeblick T, et al. The incidence of complications in endoscopic anterior thoracolumbar spinal reconstructive surgery. A prospective multicenter study comprising the first 100 consecutive cases. Spine. 1995;20:1624-1632.

Regan JJ, McAfee P, Mack M. Atlas of Endoscopic Spine Surgery. St. Louis: Quality Medical; 1995.

Rosenthal D, Marquardt G, Lorenz R, et al. Anterior decompression and stabilization using a microsurgical endoscopic technique for metastatic tumors of the thoracic spine. J Neurosurg. 1996;8:565-572.

Rosenthal D, Rosenthal R, Simone A. Removal of a protruded disc using microsurgery endoscopy. Spine. 1994;19:1087-1091.

Stillerman CB, Chen TC, Day JD, et al. The transfacet pedicle-sparing approach for thoracic disc removal: cadaveric morphometric analysis and preliminary clinical experience. J Neurosurg. 1995;83:971-976.

References

1 Mack MJ, Aronoff RJ, Acuff TE, et al. Present role of thoracoscopy in the diagnosis and treatment of diseases of the chest. Ann Thorac Surg. 1992;54:403-408.

2 Mack MJ, Regan J, Bobechko WP, et al. Applications of thoracoscopy for diseases of spine. Ann Thorac Surg. 1993;56:736-738.

3 McAfee PC, Regan JR, Zdeblick T, et al. The incidence of complications in endoscopic anterior thoracolumbar spinal reconstructive surgery. A prospective multicenter study comprising the first 100 consecutive cases. Spine. 1995;20:1624-1632.

4 Regan JJ, McAfee P, Mack M. Atlas of Endoscopic Spine Surgery. St. Louis: Quality Medical; 1995.

5 Rosenthal D, Marquardt G, Lorenz R, et al. Anterior decompression and stabilization using a microsurgical endoscopic technique for metastatic tumors of the thoracic spine. J Neurosurg. 1996;8:565-572.

6 Rosenthal D, Rosenthal R, Simone A. Removal of a protruded disc using microsurgery endoscopy. Spine. 1994;19:1087-1091.

7 Knop C, Bastian L, Lange U, et al. Complications in surgical treatment of thoracolumbar injuries. Eur Spine J. 2002;11:214-226.

8 Beisse R. Video-assisted techniques in the management of thoracolumbar fractures. Orthop Clin North Am. 2007;38:419-429.

9 Beisse R, Muckley T, Schmidt MH, et al. Surgical technique and results of endoscopic anterior spinal canal decompression. J Neurosurg Spine. 2005;2:128-136.

10 Beisse R, Trapp O. Thoracoscopic management of spinal trauma. Oper Tech Neurosurg. 2006;8:205-213.

11 Beisse R. Endoscopic surgery on the thoracolumbar junction of the spine. Eur Spine J. 2006;15:687-704.

12 Dickman CA, Rosenthal DJ, Perin NI. Thoracoscopic Spine Surgery. New York: Thieme; 1999.

13 Beisse R, Potulski M, Beger J, et al. [Development and clinical application of a thoracoscopy implantable plate frame for treatment of thoracolumbar fractures and instabilities.]. Orthopade. 2002;31:413-422.

14 Knop C, Lange U, Bastian L, et al. Biomechanical compression tests with a new implant for thoracolumbar vertebral body replacement. Eur Spine J. 2001;10:30-37.

15 Beisse R, Potulski M, Temme C, et al. [Endoscopically controlled division of the diaphragm. A minimally invasive approach to ventral management of thoracolumbar fractures of the spine.]. Unfallchirurg. 1998;101:619-627.

16 Kim DH, Jahng TA, Balabhadra RS, et al. Thoracoscopic transdiaphragmatic approach to thoracolumbar junction fractures. Spine J. 2004;4:317-328.

17 Beisse R, Potulski M, Bühren V. Endoscopic techniques for the management of spinal trauma. Eur J Trauma. 2001;27:275-291.

18 Alberico AM, Sahni KS, Hall JAJr, et al. High thoracic disc herniation. Neurosurgery. 1986;19:449-451.

19 Albrand OW, Corkill G. Thoracic disc herniation. Treatment and prognosis. Spine. 1979;4:41-46.

20 Awwad EE, Martin DS, Smith KRJr, et al. Asymptomatic versus symptomatic herniated thoracic discs: their frequency and characteristics as detected by computed tomography after myelography. Neurosurgery. 1991;28:180-186.

21 Stillerman CB, Chen TC, Day JD, et al. The transfacet pedicle-sparing approach for thoracic disc removal: cadaveric morphometric analysis and preliminary clinical experience. J Neurosurg. 1995;83:971-976.

22 Maiman DJ, Larson SJ, Luck E, et al. Lateral extracavitary approach to the spine for thoracic disc herniation: report of 23 cases. Neurosurgery. 1984;14:178-182.

23 Le Roux PD, Haglund MM, Harris AB. Thoracic disc disease: experience with the transpedicular approach in twenty consecutive patients. Neurosurgery. 1993;33:58-66.

24 Horowitz MB, Moossy JJ, Julian T, et al. Thoracic discectomy using video assisted thoracoscopy. Spine. 1994;19:1082-1086.

25 Beisse R, Potulski M, Beger J, et al. Development and clinical application of a thoracoscopic implantable frame plate for the treatment of thoracolumbar fractures and instabilities. Orthopade. 2002;31:413-422.