Therapeutic plasma exchange and intravenous immunoglobulin immunomodulatory therapy

Published on 27/02/2015 by admin

Filed under Anesthesiology

Last modified 22/04/2025

Print this page

rate 1 star rate 2 star rate 3 star rate 4 star rate 5 star
Your rating: none, Average: 0 (0 votes)

This article have been viewed 2039 times

Chapter 90 Therapeutic plasma exchange and intravenous immunoglobulin immunomodulatory therapy

Bloodletting to remove ‘evil humours’ has a long history of over 2000 years. Although not based on logic in the past, the removal of ‘noxious’ agents from the blood remains the rationale, but now there is scientific understanding of the pathophysiology of the diseases treated by plasma exchange.1 Exchange transfusions revolutionised the management of haemolytic disease in the newborn, and paved the way for therapeutic plasmapheresis and plasma exchange – the removal of plasma, with replacement by albumin-electrolyte solutions or fresh frozen plasma.

Plasma exchange was initially used in the management of hyperviscosity associated with malignant paraproteinaemia, but is now also used in the treatment of a wide range of autoimmune disorders (now > 100). Nevertheless, plasma exchange is expensive and not risk-free, and debate continues on its therapeutic role in many diseases.

For the past two decades, intravenous immunoglobulin (IVIG) has increasingly been used as an immunomodulatory agent beyond its original primary use as replacement therapy in patients with humoral immune deficiency. The use of this agent will also be referred to in this chapter as it is now being used in many disorders in which plasma exchange is effective, but the convenience and safety of IVIG therapy is preferred as an alternative. However, the underlying principles in managing autoimmune diseases in which IVIG is used are similar to those of therapeutic plasma exchange. The mechanism of action of IVIG as an immunomodulatory agent remains controversial and it is likely, as fine plasma exchange, that there is more than one mechanism in play. Therapeutic efficacy of IVIG has been established in controlled trials for a range of diseases including idiopathic thrombocytopenic purpura, Kawasaki disease, Guillain–Barré syndrome, dermatomyositis, and others. There is compelling evidence that IVIG can modulate immune reactions of T-cells, B-cells and macrophages, not only interfering with antibody production and degradation, but also modulating the complement cascade and cytokine networks.

RATIONALE FOR PLASMA EXCHANGE

Theoretically, plasma exchange should be effective to treat any disorder in which there is a pathogenic circulating factor responsible for the disease. However, this premise is probably too simplistic, and other mechanisms may contribute to its beneficial effects (Table 90.1). It is a non-specific procedure, which brings about numerous, potentially undesirable, alterations in the plasma’s milieu interieur.

Table 90.1 Rationale for plasma exchange

Removal of circulating toxic factor antibodies
Monoclonal antibodies
Autoantibodies
Alloantibodies, immune complexes, chemicals, drugs
Depletion of the mediators of inflammation
Replacement of deficient plasma factor(s)
Potentiation of drug action
Enhanced reticuloendothelial function
Altered immunoregulation
Potentiating effects of plasma exchange on other modes of therapy

PATHOPHYSIOLOGY OF AUTOIMMUNE DISEASE

Autoimmune disease originates from the breakdown of immunoregulation (i.e. immune tolerance), allowing the immune system to become autoaggressive. Autoimmune diseases having underlying humoral mechanisms result from either a circulating autoantibody against a self-antigen (alone or in combination with an environmental antigen) or circulating immune complexes (which may be deposited in the microcirculation of various organs, resulting in end-organ damage). Cellular and tissue damage is affected by the autoantibody or immune complexes activating the cellular and humoral components of the inflammatory response. The circulating proteolytic systems involved include the complement, coagulation, fibrinolytic and kinin systems. On the cellular side, neutrophils and macrophages are involved, with eosinophils and basophils also playing a part.

The varied clinical manifestations of autoimmune disorders relate more to the cell, tissue or organ involved, rather than the pathophysiological process. However, basic pathophysiological mechanisms by which autoimmune diseases occur need to be understood in order to standardise treatment. Although some cells of the host defence system, in particular the macrophages and lymphocytes, may have special differentiation appropriate to individual organs, their basic functional processes are not all that dissimilar between different organs.

In general, autoimmune disease can be an acute, self-limiting (‘one hit’) disorder, intermittent or a chronic perpetuating disorder. Acute autoimmune disease may have an identifiable trigger, such as an infection, followed by a 10-day to 3-week gap until the pathogenic humoral or cellular factors appear in the circulating blood. At this point, end-organ damage commences, and clinical features of the disease appear.

The course of the disease will be determined by several factors:

The extent of damage is a product of the:

The kinetics of the end-cell involved in the immunological damage is relevant in determining the final outcome of the disease. Ultimate recovery of organ function after ‘burn out’ of a self-limiting autoimmune disease, or control of a chronic autoimmune disease, is determined by the ability of the cell to replace and restore function to normal.

Cells are broadly divided into three kinetic characteristics:

The clinical features and final outcome of any autoimmune disease can thus be seen to be determined by many different factors, including the ability of the end-organ to repair following removal or control of the immunological insult. In many self-limiting autoimmune diseases, if the end-cell is a continuous or intermittent replicator, full recovery can be expected, as long as appropriate support to end-organ function and life support is given during the acute phase of the illness. Examples are acute tubular necrosis, acute demyelination, acute hepatic failure and some forms of marrow aplasia. However, in disorders with non-replicating cells such as acute glomerulonephritis, therapy must be aimed at removing the immunological insult or dampening its damaging affects as soon as possible, so as to minimise irreparable damage to the end-cells and thus long-term organ function. Immunological mediators may also produce disease without direct destruction of end-cells. This occurs when autoantibodies develop against cell receptors, with blocking or destruction of the receptor as is typically seen in myasthenia gravis and thyrotoxicosis.

Therapy in acute and chronic autoimmune disease aims to minimise irreparable end-organ damage and support patients during the acute illness. This therapy may include:

As most disorders are multifactorial, it is unlikely that a single form of therapy will be successful. A multipronged approach to therapy needs to be planned following an analysis of the basic underlying pathophysiology. The stage of the disease is also important (Figure 90.1). Clearly, plasma exchange will have a different response when autoantibody production is rising rapidly, compared with a stage when autoantibody has ceased production. Also, immunoregulation is a complex process, and therapies may interfere at different points in the immune mechanisms.

In some circumstances, specific and directed therapy may attack the most relevant link in the pathophysiological chain, but overall multiple approaches to therapy may be required. In general, plasma exchange is a temporising procedure and concomitant immunosuppressive therapy is required to maintain control. Plasma exchange for autoimmune disease should generally be regarded as a first step in immunomodulatory therapy, and restricted to acute or fulminant situations in which autoantibodies or immune complexes are responsible for life-threatening or end-organ damaging complications. There are some situations in which the humoral factor may be only transient (‘one antigen hit’ disorders), and no follow-up immunosuppression is required (e.g. acute postinfectious polyneuritis). Increasing monoclonal antibody therapy with rituximab (an anti-CD20 antibody) is finding a role in the longer term management of autoimmune diseases.2,3

The availability and recognition of the immunomodulatory effects of intravenous immunoglobulin has resulted in an exponential increase in its use in immune and inflammatory disorders, with its availability being one of the main drivers of the supply of human-derived plasma products. In most of the immune and inflammatory disorders in which plasma exchange has been used, intravenous immunoglobulin has been used. The mechanisms of action of intravenous immunoglobulin remain controversial. Intravenous immunoglobulin, fractionated from normal human plasma, was introduced as a replacement therapy for humoral immunodeficiency disorders, but is now widely used for a range of autoimmune and inflammatory diseases. Progress is being made in understanding the complex mechanisms by which IVIG has immunomodulatory actions. The mechanisms of action of IVIG involve modulation of expression and function of immunoglobulin Fc receptors, interference with activation of the complement system and the cytokine and immunoglobulin idiotype networks, and regulation of cell growth. There is also evidence for effects on activation, differentiation and effector functions of dendritic cells and T and B lymphocytes.4

INDICATIONS (Table 90.2)

Plasma exchange is most beneficial for immunoproliferative and autoimmune diseases. In some conditions with unclear pathophysiology, beneficial effects of plasma exchange may be due to infusion of a deficient component in the replacement plasma, rather than removal of a circulating factor.

Table 90.2 Acute diseases in which plasma exchange may be beneficial*

Immunoproliferative diseases with monoclonal immunoglobulins

Autoimmune diseases due to autoantibodies or immune complexes

Conditions in which replacement of plasma may be beneficial ± removal of toxins

Conditions in which the mechanisms are unknown

Removal of protein-bound or large molecular weight toxins

* This is an incomplete list and only includes disorders that are relatively common or in which plasma exchange has a definitive role to play.

IMMUNOLOGICAL DISEASES

DISEASES MEDIATED BY SPECIFIC AUTOANTIBODIES

IMMUNE COMPLEX DISEASE

Rapidly progressive glomerulonephritis

Immune complex-induced rapidly progressive glomerulonephritis may occur by itself or be associated with several systemic disorders (e.g. systemic lupus erythematosus, polyarteritis nodosa and Wagener’s granulomatosis).1517 Plasma exchange may result in improvement in renal function even in patients who present with anuria. The decomplementing and defibrinating effects of plasma exchange may be partly responsible for clinical improvement. The therapeutic role of plasma exchange in rapidly progressive glomerulonephritis is difficult to assess, but most experienced physicians feel that the procedure leads to a more rapid and complete recovery of renal function in fulminant, rapidly deteriorating cases. However, the ultimate prognosis of the disease depends on adequate immunosuppression to inhibit immune complex formation, or spontaneous disappearance of the inciting antigen.

OTHER IMMUNE-MEDIATED DISEASES

Thrombotic thrombocytopenic purpura

Thrombotic thrombocytopenic purpura (TTP) is a potentially fulminant and life-threatening disorder characterised by platelet microthrombi in small vessels, resulting in microangiopathy. The clinical syndrome is manifest by the pentad of thrombocytopenia, microangiopathic haemolytic anaemia, fever, renal dysfunction and neurological abnormalities. Abdominal symptoms, hepatic dysfunction and pulmonary abnormalities may also occur. With the appropriate clinical features, thrombocytopenia and a microangiopathic blood film, diagnosis is established.

TTP has been linked to a severe deficiency in ADAMTS13 with metalloprotease activity, with its target cleavage sequence in von Willebrand factor (vWF). The presence of an autoantibody inhibitor to this vWF reducing metalloproteinase has been documented in patients with both acute TTP and those with chronic relapsing forms. In normal plasma, vWF undergoes proteolysis by a specific protease, and deficiency of this cleaving protease reduces or abolishes the plasma clearance of ultralarge vWF multimers, resulting in intravascular aggregation of platelets, particularly at sites of intravascular shear stress. The inhibitor to the metalloproteinase has been demonstrated to be an IgG autoantibody.

There is a primary idiopathic form of the disease that usually has an acute presentation and probably has an underlying autoimmune mechanism. This form may be associated with a variety of prodromal infections (viral or bacterial). Bacterial cytotoxins, produced by Shigella dysenteriae type 1 and certain Escherichia coli serotypes, have been related to TTP and haemolytic uraemic syndrome (HUS), probably by initiating damage to vascular endothelial cells, possibly via cytokine mechanisms. TTP may be associated with various drugs (cytotoxic agents), toxins and bites. Cytomegalovirus (CMV), human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) and herpes viruses have also been implicated. Chemotherapy-associated TTP/HUS is being increasingly recognised and may be associated with a range of cytotoxic medications. Severe microangiopathy resembling TTP has also been reported as a complication of acute graft-versus-host disease in patients receiving ciclosporin prophylaxis following allogeneic bone marrow transplant.

TTP used to be a fatal disease in 90% of patients, but dramatic improvement in its outcome has occurred over the past two decades with the development of effective therapy. Plasma exchange has become the cornerstone of the treatment with fresh frozen plasma replacement.21,22 Cryoprecipitate-poor plasma (depleted in vWF) may offer advantages over whole fresh frozen plasma. It is now possible to achieve remissions in the majority of patients and cures are now common, though unfortunately relapse may occur. The clinical course at relapse is usually milder than the disease at presentation and less aggressive therapy may be needed.

Haemolytic uraemic syndrome (HUS)

This syndrome has many similarities to TTP, but renal involvement in contrast to cerebral in TTP is the hallmark in association with microangiopathy and thrombocytopenia.23 The prognosis and approach to management of HUS is similar to TTP. It usually occurs in children (related to bacterial or viral infections), but may rarely be seen in adults, in whom the disease may take a more chronic and sinister course. In adult cases medications are commonly implicated.

Inflammatory demyelinating neuropathies and the Guillain–Barré syndrome (GBS)

This acute self-limiting disease in which an acute demyelinating neuropathy occurs (usually following a viral infection) commonly results in admission to the intensive care unit (ICU) (see Chapter 49). There is demyelination due to postinfectious autoimmunity, with both cellular and humoral arms of the immune system attacking myelin. There is now wide experience in the use of plasma exchange and IVIG therapy in GBS, with controlled trials substantiating its benefits of shortening of the illness and complications. Therapy should be instituted early.11,24 As GBS also responds to high-dose IVIG there is debate as to which should be the first line of therapy. Decisions are usually made on the basis of local logistics and economics as the therapies are comparable in relationship to efficacy and safety.25 In some cases the onset of recovery after therapy may be delayed, probably due to time for remyelination to occur. Some patients show rapid improvement after plasma exchange, suggesting the presence of neuronal blocking factors. Chronic inflammatory demyelinating peripheral neuropathy (CIPD) is related to GBS, and plasma exchange and/or IVIG have important roles in treatment, in many cases requiring long-term therapy.

COMPLICATIONS

Plasma exchange is a relatively safe procedure, but close supervision by experienced physicians and apheresis operators is essential. A sound understanding of the haemodynamic, biochemical, haematological and immunological effects of plasma exchange is of paramount importance. Potential complications of plasma exchange include fluid imbalance, reactions to replacement fluids, vasovagal reactions, pyrogenic reactions, hypothermia, embolism (air or microaggregates), hypocalcaemia, anaemia, thrombocytopenia, haemostatic disturbances, hepatitis, hypogammaglobulinaemia, and altered pharmacokinetics of drugs. Prevention and treatment of most of these complications are usually obvious, but specific mention should be made of the following.

REFERENCES

1 Isbister JP. Plasma exchange: a selective form of blood-letting. Med J Aust. 1979;2:167-173.

2 Scheinberg M, Hamerschlak N, Kutner JM, et al. Rituximab in refractory autoimmune diseases: Brazilian experience with 29 patients (2002–2004). Clin Exp Rheumatol. 2006;24:65-69.

3 Virgolini L, Marzocchi V. Rituximab in autoimmune diseases. Biomed Pharmacother. 2004;58:299-309.

4 Negi VS, Elluru S, Siberil S, et al. Intravenous immunoglobulin: an update on the clinical use and mechanisms of action. J Clin Immunol. 2007;27:233-245.

5 Stegmayr BG. A survey of blood purification techniques. Transfus Apher Sci. 2005;32:209-220.

6 Ullrich H, Kuehnl P. New trends in specific immunoadsorption. Transfus Apher Sci. 2004;30:223-231.

7 Mehta J, Singhal S. Hyperviscosity syndrome in plasma cell dyscrasias. Semin Thromb Hemost. 2003;29:467-471.

8 Shah MK, Hugghins SY. Characteristics and outcomes of patients with Goodpasture’s syndrome. Southern Med J. 2002;95:1411-1418.

9 Zhu KY, Feferman T, Maiti PK, et al. Intravenous immunoglobulin suppresses experimental myasthenia gravis: immunological mechanisms. J Immunol. 2006;176:187-197.

10 Gajdos P, Chevret S, Toyka K. Intravenous immunoglobulin for myasthenia gravis. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2006;2:CD002277.

11 Green DM. Weakness in the ICU: Guillain–Barré syndrome, myasthenia gravis, and critical illness polyneuropathy/myopathy. Neurologist. 2005;11:338-347.

12 Shariatmadar S, Noto TA. Plasma exchange in stiff-man syndrome. Ther Apher. 2001;5:64-67.

13 Cantiniaux S, Azulay JP, Boucraut J, et al. [Stiff man syndrome: clinical forms, treatment and clinical course]. Rev Neurol (Paris). 2006;162:832-839.

14 Abshire T, Kenet G. Recombinant factor VIIa: review of efficacy, dosing regimens and safety in patients with congenital and acquired factor VIII or IX inhibitors. J Thromb Haemost. 2004;2:899-909.

15 Stegmayr BG, Almroth G, Berlin G, et al. Plasma exchange or immunoadsorption in patients with rapidly progressive crescentic glomerulonephritis. A Swedish multi-center study. Int J Artif Organs. 1999;22:81-87.

16 Rahman T, Harper L. Plasmapheresis in nephrology: an update. Curr Opin Nephrol Hypertens. 2006;15:603-609.

17 Jayne DR, Gaskin G, Rasmussen N, et al. Randomized trial of plasma exchange or high-dosage methylprednisolone as adjunctive therapy for severe renal vasculitis. J Am Soc Nephrol. 2007;18:2180-2188.

18 Pagnoux C, Korach JM, Guillevin L. Indications for plasma exchange in systemic lupus erythematosus in 2005. Lupus. 2005;14:871-877.

19 Lehrich RW, Rocha PN, Reinsmoen N, et al. Intravenous immunoglobulin and plasmapheresis in acute humoral rejection: experience in renal allograft transplantation. Hum Immunol. 2005;66:350-358.

20 Rocha PN, Butterly DW, Greenberg A, et al. Beneficial effect of plasmapheresis and intravenous immunoglobulin on renal allograft survival of patients with acute humoral rejection. Transplantation. 2003;75:1490-1495.

21 Brunskill SJ, Tusold A, Benjamin S, et al. A systematic review of randomized controlled trials for plasma exchange in the treatment of thrombotic thrombocytopenic purpura. Transfus Med. 2007;17:17-35.

22 Ozkalemkas F, Ali R, Ozkocaman V, et al. Therapeutic plasma exchange plus corticosteroid for the treatment of the thrombotic thrombocytopenic purpura: a single institutional experience in the southern Marmara region of Turkey. Transfus Apher Sci. 2007;36:109-115.

23 Amirlak I, Amirlak B. Haemolytic uraemic syndrome: an overview. Nephrology. 2006;11:213-218.

24 Raphael JC, Chevret S, Hughes RA, et al. Plasma exchange for Guillain–Barré syndrome. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2002;2:CD001798.

25 Tsai CP, Wang KC, Liu CY, et al. Pharmacoeconomics of therapy for Guillain–Barré syndrome: plasma exchange and intravenous immunoglobulin. J Clin Neurosci. 2007;14:625-629.