The pancreas and spleen

Published on 14/06/2015 by admin

Filed under Surgery

Last modified 22/04/2025

Print this page

rate 1 star rate 2 star rate 3 star rate 4 star rate 5 star
Your rating: none, Average: 0 (0 votes)

This article have been viewed 1948 times

15 The pancreas and spleen

The pancreas

Surgical anatomy

The pancreas develops from separate ventral and dorsal buds of endoderm that appear during the fourth week of fetal life. The ventral pancreas develops in association with the biliary tree, and its duct joins the common bile duct before emptying into the duodenum through the papilla of Vater (Fig. 15.1). During gestation, the duodenum rotates clockwise on its long axis, and the bile duct and ventral pancreas pass round behind it to fuse with the dorsal pancreas. Most of the duct that drains the dorsal pancreas joins the duct draining the ventral pancreas to form the main pancreatic duct (of Wirsung); the rest of the dorsal duct becomes the accessory pancreatic duct (of Santorini) and enters the duodenum 2.5 cm proximal to the main duct. In fetal life, the common bile duct and main pancreatic duct are dilated at their junction to form the ampulla of Vater. In extra-uterine life, only 10% of individuals retain this ampulla, although most retain a short common channel between the two duct systems.

The pancreas lies retroperitoneally, behind the lesser sac and stomach. The head of the gland lies within the C-loop of the duodenum, with which it shares a blood supply from the coeliac and superior mesenteric arteries (Fig. 15.2). The superior mesenteric vein runs upwards to the left of the uncinate process, and joins the splenic vein behind the neck of the pancreas to form the portal vein. The body and tail of the pancreas lie in front of the splenic vein as far as the splenic hilum, and receive arterial blood from the splenic artery as it runs along the upper border of the gland. The intimate relationship of the friable pancreas to these major blood vessels is the reason that bleeding is problematic after pancreatic trauma. The close association between the common bile duct and the head of pancreas explains why obstructive jaundice is so common in cancer of the head of the pancreas, and why gallstones frequently give rise to acute pancreatitis.

Surgical physiology

Pancreatitis

Pancreatitis may be acute or chronic. After an attack of acute pancreatitis, the gland usually returns to anatomical and functional normality, whereas chronic pancreatitis is associated with a permanent derangement of structure and function. Some patients suffer from recurrent acute pancreatitis but enjoy relatively normal health between attacks.

Acute pancreatitis

Acute pancreatitis is a common cause of emergency admission to hospital. There are 100–400 new cases per million of the population each year in the UK, and the incidence continues to rise, possibly because of an increase in gallstone disease, alcohol misuse and obesity in the population. The disease is relatively rare in children, but all adult age groups may be affected.

Physiological Sphincter of Oddi dysfunction

Other causes

Acute pancreatitis occurs in approximately 5% of patients undergoing ERCP. Such cases are usually mild but can be life threatening. Trauma, particularly blunt abdominal trauma, may cause pancreatitis or pancreatic duct disruption. Hypercalcaemia is a rare cause of pancreatitis and is usually secondary to hyperparathyroidism. Hyperlipidaemia, due to familial hypertriglyceridaemia, is another rare cause of pancreatitis and in both of these metabolic conditions treatment is directed at the underlying cause. A small number of patients may have a family history of acute pancreatitis. Hereditary pancreatitis is a rare condition caused by mutations of the cationic trypsinogen gene and leads to the development of chronic pancreatitis at a young age.

Viral infections, including mumps, Coxsackie virus, rubella, measles and cytomegalovirus are the most common cause of pancreatitis in children. Bacterial infections are a very rare cause of pancreatitis. Ascaris worms are a relatively common cause of pancreatitis in areas of high prevalence, due to migration through the duodenal papilla from the common bile duct. Many drugs have been associated with acute pancreatitis although it is often difficult to prove a causal association and other causes always need to be considered. Azathioprine, mesalazine and simvastatin are responsible for the best documented cases.

Pancreatic neoplasms may cause obstruction of the pancreatic duct and lead to acute pancreatitis. Such neoplasms can be small and thus easily missed, even by CT. The presence of unexplained pancreatic duct dilatation or other suspicious clinical or radiological appearances should prompt further investigation, usually by endoscopic ultrasound.

Diagnosis

The key to the diagnosis of acute pancreatitis is a high index of suspicion and measurement of the serum amylase concentration. Serum lipase is an alternative and has some advantages but is rarely available in UK hospitals. The usual diagnostic cut-off for serum amylase is three times the upper reference limit but the diagnosis should be considered in any patient with a relevant history, even where there is a non-diagnostic rise in serum amylase. A high serum amylase can be seen in patients with abdominal pain due to other pathology. The most common of these is mesenteric ischaemia due either to mesenteric vascular occlusion or small bowel strangulation, and when there is diagnostic doubt, an urgent CT is indicated to clarify the diagnosis. High serum amylase levels are also seen in some patients with perforated ulcer or ruptured aneurysm but rarely above the diagnostic threshold for pancreatitis. In all cases, if the history or clinical examination is atypical for acute pancreatitis, CT should be carried out to clarify the diagnosis.

Serum amylase levels fall rapidly in acute pancreatitis and have no relationship to the severity of the attack or the resolution of the disease. Patients who present some days after the initial onset of abdominal pain may have normal or near-normal serum amylase levels and although urinary amylase or serum lipase can be helpful in such cases, the diagnosis is again best clarified by CT.

Assessment of severity

Approximately 80% of patients with acute pancreatitis will have a self-limiting illness which resolves within 48–72 hours. In such cases the main issue is identification and treatment of the underlying cause. The major challenge faced in the management of this condition is the 20% of patients who have a severe episode of pancreatitis in whom life-threatening complications can occur. Much effort has been directed at the early recognition of severe acute pancreatitis, the aim being to ensure these patients are adequately managed and placed in an appropriate high-dependency or intensive care environment. Many systems have been proposed of which the Glasgow Prognostic Score, APACHE II score and C-reactive protein have been most widely studied. None of these however have proved sufficiently accurate to influence management decisions, particularly in the crucial first 24 hours after hospital admission. Other attempts with serum or urine markers of severity have either proved disappointing or have not yet been tested in prospective studies. When faced with a patient with acute pancreatitis, the challenge therefore is to recognize the development of a severe attack which necessitates a clear understanding of the natural history of the illness.

The most important feature of severe acute pancreatitis is the development of multiple organ dysfunction syndrome (MODS). In most patients who develop severe acute pancreatitis this is identified by the presence of hypoxia, shock or more rarely, renal dysfunction around the time of admission to hospital. A minority of patients will develop such complications over the course of the next 48 hours and in these cases the presence of SIRS (systemic inflammatory response syndrome) characterized by a tachycardia, raised white cell count and/or tachypnoea is almost always present. It is very rare for a patient without SIRS at admission to develop MODS. Where SIRS persists for more than 48 hours, the risk of further deterioration is very high and such patients need close monitoring for the development of respiratory and renal complications. It is the group of patients with early persistent SIRS or MODS who are also at greatest risk of developing septic and other local complications of acute pancreatitis.

Contrast enhanced CT is used in some institutions to identify severe acute pancreatitis, as the presence of pancreatic necrosis or extensive fluid collections identifies a group at high risk of further complications. However it is increasingly recognized that the main determinant of outcome is early systemic organ dysfunction and the role of early CT is now mainly confined to cases of diagnostic doubt.

Management

Most attacks of acute pancreatitis will settle with conservative management involving intravenous fluids, analgesia and gradual re-introduction of diet when nausea and vomiting have settled. All patients with SIRS or early systemic organ dysfunction should be managed in a high-dependency or intensive care environment where adequate monitoring and specialist care is available.

Conservative treatment

Pain relief. Severe pain requires the administration of opiates; there is no evidence to support the use of pethidine rather than morphine.

Fluid resuscitation. Patients with severe acute pancreatitis often require large volumes of fluid to maintain adequate urine output and blood pressure. Adequate early resuscitation in such cases is the most important consideration in early management and where systemic organ dysfunction is present will necessitate invasive monitoring of venous and arterial pressure. Patients with MODS or SIRS will need oxygen therapy and continuous monitoring of oxygen saturation as well as urine output.

Suppression of pancreatic function. There is no evidence that suppression of pancreatic function improves the outcome in acute pancreatitis. Nasogastric tubes are not routinely used. Fluids and diet are withheld until nausea and vomiting settle and in cases where systemic complications or other factors prevent recommencement of normal diet, nasoenteric feeding is commenced at an early stage. Suppression of pancreatic secretion by drugs such as octreotide or somatostatin is of no benefit in acute pancreatitis.

Prevention of infection. Antibiotic prophylaxis has been advocated by some as a means of reducing the risk of infected pancreatic necrosis. Others have been concerned that the more widespread use of antibiotics will result in an increased incidence of severe fungal infection. The most recent consensus is that there is no evidence that prophylactic antibiotics reduce the incidence of infected pancreatic necrosis or mortality (EBM 15.1). It is important to recognize that patients with severe acute pancreatitis often have evidence of SIRS and the presence of a fever and raised white cell count are to be expected, even in the absence of infection. The only definite indication for early antibiotic therapy is when patients are suspected of having cholangitis, which may co-exist with gallstone pancreatitis. Jaundiced patients with SIRS are therefore managed with appropriate broad spectrum antibiotics while arrangements are made for urgent ERCP as described below.

Inhibition of inflammatory response. Severe acute pancreatitis is one of many conditions where systemic organ dysfunction is driven by the systemic inflammatory response and there has been much experimental and clinical interest in the role of down-regulation of this response as a potential treatment for acute pancreatitis. The only agent that has been studied in large, prospective clinical trials was the platelet-activating factor (PAF) antagonist, lexipafant. Despite encouraging experimental data and promising results from initial clinical trials, a large international trial, recruiting 1500 patients, showed no difference in mortality.

Nutritional support. Patients with severe acute pancreatitis who are unable to resume normal diet within 48–72 hours require nutritional support. This is best delivered by an enteral rather than parenteral route as meta-analyses of randomized trials (EBM 15.2) have demonstrated that TPN has a higher rate of complications and mortality. There are also sound experimental reasons to believe that enteral nutrition has additional benefits by potentially reducing the risk of bacterial translocation from the gut. There is no evidence that nasojejunal feeding is better or safer than nasogastric feeding but the nasojejunal route will be required where gastric stasis or outlet obstruction prevent effective nasogastric delivery.

Other measures. A recent randomized trial assessed the role of probiotic therapy as an adjunct to early enteral feeding in the hope that this might reduce bacterial translocation from the gut more than enteral nutrition alone, thus potentially preventing later septic complications. Unfortunately, probiotic therapy actually increased mortality due to gut ischaemia and should no longer be used in these patients. Other proposed treatments which have been found to be of no benefit in prospective clinical trials include antiprotease therapy and peritoneal lavage.

15.1 Prophylactic antibiotics in severe acute pancreatitis

Bai Y, Gao J, Zou DW, Li ZS. Prophylactic antibiotics cannot reduce infected pancreatic necrosis and mortality in acute necrotizing pancreatitis: evidence from a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Am J Gastroenterol 2008; 103(1):104–110.

15.2 Nutritional support in severe acute pancreatitis

Petrov MS, Whelan K. Comparison of complications attributable to enteral and parenteral nutrition in predicted severe acute pancreatitis: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Br J Nutr 2010; 103(9):1287–1295.

Endoscopic treatment

Gallstone pancreatitis is due to the transient impaction of a stone at the papilla causing pancreatic duct obstruction. There is good experimental evidence that the duration of this obstruction is an important determinant of the severity of an attack and so early removal of an impacted gallstone by ERC and sphincterotomy has long been proposed as a potential treatment option for patients. Unfortunately the results from randomized trials have been conflicting, and differences in study design have made direct comparisons difficult. Patients with evidence of obstructive jaundice and SIRS within the first 24 hours are suffering from or are at least at risk of developing cholangitis and there is broad consensus that these patients should have urgent ERC with sphincterotomy. However the majority of patients will pass the gallstone spontaneously and in this situation ERC carries additional risk and no potential benefit (EBM 15.3). The most recent meta-analysis of randomized trials shows no benefit from early ERC in patients with severe acute pancreatitis where cholangitis is not present. Early ERC with stone removal can however be life-saving in the patient with cholangitis and it is important to be alert to this possibility in patients diagnosed as having severe acute pancreatitis. Our own practice is to perform urgent ERC and sphincterotomy only in patients with acute pancreatitis associated with obstructive jaundice and SIRS but there is considerable variation in practice across the UK.

Complications

Infected pancreatic necrosis

Pancreatic necrosis itself is not an indication for surgical intervention, even when complicated by MODS. However, infected pancreatic necrosis is the most challenging complication of acute pancreatitis and management is complex, requiring the input of surgeons, interventional radiologists and endoscopists, as well as the critical care team. Infection occurs in up to 40% of patients with pancreatic necrosis and usually presents more than 2 weeks after symptom onset. The development of infection may be suspected where there is deterioration in systemic organ failure or where new organ failure develops in a patient more than 2 weeks after admission. However, infected pancreatic necrosis is not always complicated by organ failure and may present with worsening pain and fever associated with a rise in inflammatory parameters but with little evidence of systemic illness.

The development of infected pancreatic necrosis may be associated with evidence of gas within a pancreatic collection seen on CT, but this is not always the case and it can be difficult to make this diagnosis on radiological grounds alone. In some centres, if infected pancreatic necrosis is suspected, fine needle aspirates are taken from pancreatic collections under CT or ultrasound guidance to establish whether or not infection is present, with early surgical intervention where infection is proven. Others prefer to act on clinical grounds and where infection is suspected place a percutaneous drain under CT guidance prior to definitive surgical, endoscopic or radiological management.

There is much variation in practice in the management of this life-threatening complication of acute pancreatitis and the variety of approaches reflects variation in local expertise and experience and a lack of good evidence supporting any one approach over another. Where infected pancreatic necrosis is confirmed or strongly suspected, the common approaches to management are briefly described below.

Pancreatic pseudocyst

A pancreatic pseudocyst is a collection of pancreatic secretions and inflammatory exudate enclosed in a wall of fibrous or granulation tissue. It differs from a true cyst in that the collection has no epithelial lining and is surrounded by inflammatory tissue. Pseudocysts form most commonly in the lesser sac or in the adjacent retroperitoneum, and by consensus are differentiated from acute fluid collections in that they persist for 4 or more weeks from the onset of acute pancreatitis (Fig. 15.5). Small pseudocysts are usually asymptomatic and resolve spontaneously. In about 10% of patients, larger collections persist and can pose problems.

Pseudocysts typically do not declare themselves for some weeks after the episode of pancreatitis. Persistent or intermittent abdominal discomfort and mild to moderate hyperamylasaemia usually signal their presence, and larger collections may compress neighbouring structures to cause vomiting and obstructive jaundice. Some cysts become so large that they are palpable and, in some cases, visible.

The presence of a pseudocyst is not in itself an indication for surgical treatment. Approximately 50% of asymptomatic pseudocysts will resolve up to 12 weeks following the onset of acute pancreatitis. Treatment is indicated only if the pseudocyst is enlarging or symptomatic, and aims to prevent infection of the contents, haemorrhage or rupture. Simple percutaneous drainage carries a high risk of recurrence and some form of internal drainage is usually preferred. The conventional surgical approach consists of drainage of the pseudocyst into the stomach (pseudocyst-gastrostomy), a Roux loop of jejunum (pseudocyst-jejunostomy), or duodenum (pseudocyst-duodenostomy); whichever appears most appropriate (Fig. 15.6). As the tissues holding the sutures must be firm, it is desirable to avoid surgery until at least 6 weeks after the onset of the acute attack to allow the walls of the pseudocyst to ‘mature’. Endoscopic cyst-gastrostomy or cyst-duodenostomy offers an alternative to surgery, and is now usually carried out under endoscopic ultrasound guidance. Laparoscopic cystgastrostomy or cyst-enterostomy is also described but the relative roles of conventional surgical, laparoscopic and endoscopic drainage have yet to be determined. The selection of the appropriate procedure is often determined by the clinical presentation, anatomical features of the fluid collection, the extent of necrosis present and of course, local expertise. A multidisciplinary approach is mandatory.

Chronic pancreatitis

Chronic pancreatitis is a chronic inflammatory condition characterized by fibrosis and the destruction of exocrine pancreatic tissue.

Investigations and diagnosis

The initial investigation for suspected chronic pancreatitis is CT. This may reveal the speckled calcification typical of chronic pancreatitis or may show evidence of inflammatory changes or pancreatic duct dilatation or pseudocyst formation (Fig. 15.8). MRCP is of value to reveal the architecture of the pancreatic duct, particularly if surgery or endoscopic therapy is contemplated. When investigating these patients, it must be borne in mind that cancer of the pancreas may block the duct system and cause pancreatitis, and that the two conditions can co-exist. Endoscopic ultrasound is increasingly utilized where diagnostic uncertainty exists, allowing pancreatic fine needle biopsy where appropriate.

Pancreatic endocrine function is assessed by measurement of random blood glucose levels, supplemented if necessary by a glucose tolerance test. Exocrine function can be measured in a multitude of ways, but insufficiency may not be detectable until 90% of the pancreatic parenchyma is destroyed. If necessary, faecal fat excretion can be measured over 3–5 days while the patient’s fat intake is controlled at 100 g/day (normal individuals excrete less than 5 g/day). Faecal elastase is a more convenient method of assessment of exocrine pancreatic function but is less accurate. Where assays of exocrine function are not readily available, a trial of oral pancreatic supplements may be attempted.

Management

The diagnosis of chronic pancreatitis is not in itself an indication for treatment. Considerable clinical judgment is needed to determine the need for, and timing of, intervention. In most cases, pain is the most important indication for surgery but complications resulting from biliary obstruction or gastric outlet obstruction may also necessitate intervention. Many patients have complex problems and need a multidisciplinary approach to treatment.

Neoplasms of the exocrine pancreas

Pancreatic tumours are epithelial in origin, and 80% of these are pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC). It is of importance that although the majority of tumours of the pancreas are PDAC, there are nearly 20 different histological types of pancreatic tumour (intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasm (IPMN), cystic mucinous or serous tumours, solid-pseudo papillary tumours, acinar cell carcinoma) or tumours with roughly similar clinical presentation (cholangiocarcinoma, ampullary, or duodenal carcinomas) with much better prognosis.

Careful assessment and staging of the individual patient is therefore required, to avoid inappropriate management pathways, based on the assumption that a pancreatic mass is a PDAC. Advances in cross sectional imaging (CT/MR) and the widespread availability of endoscopic ultrasound will allow accurate pre-treatment confirmation of the diagnosis in the majority of cases.

Adenocarcinoma of the pancreas

Pathology

Pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC)

The majority of adenocarcinomas arise from ductal rather than acinar tissue, 60% arising in the head of the gland. The histology (Fig. 15.10) is characterized by groups of infiltrating carcinoma cells often some (histological) distance apart, interspersed by a fibrous stroma, with involvement of nerves, vessels, lymphatics and lymph nodes, at a relatively early phase. Metastatic spread is most commonly to the liver and lung; 80% of patients present with either locoregional or metastatic dissemination.

Mucinous cystic neoplasm

Mucinous cystic tumours of the pancreas predominate in the body and tail of the pancreas and have a strong female predilection. They are multiloculated tumours with a characteristic smooth glistening surface, a dense fibrous wall and occasional calcification (Fig. 15.11). They arise from oversecretion of the mucus by the hyperplastic columnar lining of the ducts and therefore contain thickened viscous material, which can also be haemorrhagic. These tumours should be considered potentially malignant but are classified histologically as benign, borderline, or malignant based on degree of dysplastic changes.

Solid pseudopapillary tumour of the pancreas

Solid pseudopapillary tumour, otherwise known as solid-cystic tumour, or Frantz tumour of the pancreas, is an unusual form of pancreatic carcinoma (Fig. 15.12). Its natural history differs from the more common pancreatic adenocarcinoma in that it is almost always in female patients (10:1), often at a young age (20–30 years), is more indolent, and carries a better prognosis. Pathologically, the tumour is usually well circumscribed with regions of necrosis, haemorrhage, and cystic degeneration. Metastatic disease can occur, usually involving the liver, and resection is the preferred treatment.

Clinical features of pancreatic neoplasms

Presenting symptoms are dependent on the site of the tumour within the pancreas. For tumours in the head of the pancreas, painless jaundice, associated with weight loss is the classical presentation. Involvement of the common bile duct as it runs through the head of the pancreas, results in a block to the flow of bile from the liver to the intestine, resulting in obstructive jaundice where the urine is dark and the interruption of the enterohepatic circulation results in pale stools due to the lack of bile pigments The gallbladder may become dilated and palpable (although non-tender) and this is a worrying sign in a jaundiced patient (Courvoisier’s Law; Table 15.2). Intense itching may result in skin excoriation from scratching. Loss of taste, poor appetite and weight loss are common.

Table 15.2 Named signs and laws in pancreatic malignancy

Courvoisier’s Law Trousseau’s Sign
In the presence of a non-tender palpable gallbladder, painless jaundice is unlikely to be caused by gallstones Thrombophlebitis migrans in a patient with pancreatic carcinoma, a non-metastatic manifestation of malignancy

For tumours of the body and tail, biliary obstruction occurs late, and symptoms are often vague, with anorexia, weight loss and with subsequent involvement of the retroperitoneum, the development of back pain. New onset diabetes may predate the diagnosis. Delay in diagnosis is common, although increasing numbers are being diagnosed through cross sectional imaging studies. Steatorrhoea may result in initial investigations for an alteration in bowel habit. A late manifestation is a malignancy-associated hypercoagulable state, resulting in intravascular clots with vasculitis, named thrombophlebitis migrans (Trousseau’s sign, Table 15.2).

Investigations and multidisciplinary management (MDM) planning

Patients should be managed by specialist multidisciplinary teams with an interest in pancreatic cancer. Trans-abdominal ultrasound, along with biochemical confirmation of cholestasis, is the initial investigation for the jaundiced patient, which will confirm intra- and extrahepatic biliary dilatation, exclude gallstones, and may show the mass lesion in the pancreas or liver metastases.

High quality multidetector CT scanning (Fig. 15.13), ± MR/MRCP can noninvasively define the site of the lesion and the extent of local or distant involvement. Diagnostic endoscopy may allow biopsy of an ampullary lesion. Endoscopic ultrasound can provide information on local staging, and also provide cytological confirmation of the diagnosis (EUS-FNA) without compromising resectability. Circulating tumour markers (e.g. CA 19–9) lack sufficient sensitivity and specificity for diagnosis but may be useful in the follow-up of treated patients.

Assessment of co-morbidity and fitness may be required prior to management planning at a Regional Pancreatic Multidisciplinary meeting. Early drainage of the biliary tree (ERCP/PTC), before MDM discussion is to be avoided where possible, as optimum treatment pathways may be compromised in some patients, through introduction of infection or procedure associated morbidity.

Curative management

Surgical resection currently offers the only potential for cure in pancreatic tumours. Tumours localised to the pancreatic parenchyma, or with limited involvement of the peripancreatic fat or lymph nodes may be considered for resection. Many adenocarcinomas of the body and tail are unresectable at diagnosis, but when identified early may be removed by distal pancreatectomy and splenectomy.

For tumours sited in the head of the pancreas the standard operation is a pancreaticoduodenectomy (Whipple’s procedure) (Fig. 15.14), which entails block resection of the head of the pancreas, the distal half of the stomach, the duodenum, gallbladder and common bile duct. Reconstruction is achieved by anastomoses of the pancreatic tail remnant to the jejunum (or stomach) and anastomosing the common hepatic duct and the stomach to the jejunum. The procedure used to carry a prohibitively high operative mortality, but in specialist hands this should now be less than 5%. Attempts to improve prognosis through escalating the radicality of resection by removing all of the pancreas or by extending the lymphadenectomy have proved disappointing. A standard pancreaticoduodenectomy combined with adjuvant chemotherapy, remains the standard of care, and is associated with a median survival of 24 months, although long-term cure remains a rarity. The prospects for patients with cancer of the periampullary region, distal common bile duct or duodenum are less gloomy, with 5-year survival rates ranging from 20% to 40%.

Palliative treatment

Only about 15–20% of patients are candidates for resection through a combination of advanced stage or co-morbidity. The objective is the optimization of quality of life through relief of obstructive symptoms (jaundice or duodenal obstruction), pruritus, and pain control. Effective preoperative staging has reduced the number of patients found to have inoperable disease at exploratory laparotomy, although when this occurs a double (biliary and gastric) bypass is appropriate.

Where inoperability is confirmed at the pretreatment planning meeting, surgical bypass can be avoided by achieving biliary drainage endoscopically at ERCP, or radiologically by percutaneous transhepatic cholangiography (PTC), along with brush cytology for histological confirmation. This is particularly important if surgery is not contemplated, as a number of benign lesions (e.g. autoimmune pancreatitis, chronic pancreatitis) can masquerade as malignancy and, as discussed above, a number of pancreatic mass lesions may have a significantly better prognosis than pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma. In those with negative brush cytology at the time of biliary drainage, cytology may be obtained by EUS-FNA. This is of importance in that quality of life can be improved through palliative chemotherapy and most oncologists will not proceed without histological evidence of malignancy.

Patients often benefit from proactive nutritional support with the addition of pancreatic exocrine supplements to alleviate steatorrhoea, dietary advice and antiemetics. Dexamethasone can be of benefit, but close glucose control is needed. Pain is often a late manifestation, but can often be effective controlled through an analgesic ladder or occasionally coeliac plexus block or thoracoscopic splanchnicectomy.

Pancreatic neuroendocrine tumours (PET)

Pancreatic neuroendocrine tumours are rare tumours (approximately 1/100 000 population/year) of which 60% are non-functioning or secrete peptides with low biological impact such as PP or neurotensin. In contrast to insulinoma, the majority of which are benign, approximately 50% of gastrinomas and the majority of non-functioning pancreatic neuroendocrine tumours are malignant (Table 15.3). They are usually sporadic but they may also appear among other features of genetic syndromes like multiple endocrine neoplasia type I or von Hippel–Lindau disease. In multiple endocrine neoplasia (MEN)1, pancreatic neuroendocrine tumours occur in 40–80% of patients and are mostly non-functioning tumours or gastrinomas. Pancreatic neuroendocrine tumours occur in 10–15% of patients with Von Hippel–Lindau (VHL) and are frequently multiple (> 30%).

Non-functioning PET

Many non- functional PETs are already metastatic by the time of diagnosis with the liver being the most common site of metastasis. Regional lymph node spread is also common, and PET may have a 5-year survival as low as 30%. Presentation is related to the mass effect of the tumour – symptoms are therefore often non-specific. Surgery with curative intent is the mainstay of treatment for localized or locoregional disease (Fig. 15.15). Non-functioning tumours should also be resected if sporadic and if > 2 cm in MEN1 or > 2–3 cm in VHL. Debulking surgery as well as other forms of local treatment like transarterial chemo-embolization or radiofrequency ablation can improve prognosis, even in patients with liver metastases. Systemic therapies have also been better defined and include radionuclide therapy against somatostatin receptors or MIBG and chemotherapy especially for poorly differentiated tumours. Cytotoxic therapy with compounds like streptozotocin, 5-fluorouracil or doxorubicin can achieve modest outcome.

Miscellaneous PETs

For VIPomas, glucagonomas, somatostatinomas, and PPomas, the biochemical markers are vasoactive intestinal peptide (VIP), glucagon, somatostatin, and PP, respectively, and the clinical features are detailed in Table 15.3. These tumours are malignant in the vast majority of patients and may present as large tumours at the time of diagnosis. Up to 70% of patients have evidence of spread of the tumour at the time of diagnosis. Aggressive surgical removal of as much tumour as possible is often indicated to relieve some of the severe symptoms that these tumours may cause because of secretion of hormones.

Multiple endocrine neoplasia type 1

Multiple endocrine neoplasia type 1 is characterized by hyperplasia and/or neoplasm of the parathyroid glands, enteropancreatic NETs, and pituitary adenomas. The gene for type 1 MEN has been localized to chromosome band 11q13. It is a tumour suppressor gene that encodes menin, a nuclear protein. Some patients do not present with all these tumours, so it has been agreed that diagnosis is made when a patient presents with two of these concomitantly. To diagnose familial MEN-1 syndrome, a first-degree relative has to manifest at least one of the tumours previously mentioned. Hyperparathyroidism occurs in about 90% of patients; endocrine pancreatic tumours in 60% of patients, usually they are small and non-functional, and the most common hormonally active ones are insulinomas or gastrinomas. In contrast to sporadic insulinoma these are multiple in 90% of MEN 1 patients. Pituitary adenomas are present in 40% of patients, and in 60% of the patients, skin manifestations can also be present. Biochemical screening for pancreatic NETs, in the presence of suspected MEN 1 syndrome, should include gastrin, insulin/pro-insulin, PP, glucagon, and CgA, which together have a sensitivity of approximately 70% that can be increased if α- and β-HCG subunits, VIP, postprandial gastrin, and PP measurements are added. It is recommended that carriers of MEN-1 mutation are screened biochemically every 1–3 years for hyperparathyroidism, prolactinoma, gastrinoma, insulinoma, and other enteropancreatic tumours. MEN 2 is not associated with pancreatic endocrine tumours.

The spleen

Surgical anatomy

The spleen is a vascular organ lying in the left upper quadrant of the abdomen alongside the 9th, 10th and 11th ribs, and is usually impalpable. It weighs 75–150 g in the adult, is between 8 cm and 13 cm in length, and is ellipsoid in shape. The convex outer surface and superior pole lies against the diaphragm, the concave inner surface is related to the fundus of the stomach, the tail of the pancreas and the upper pole of the right kidney, and its lower pole rests on the splenic flexure of the colon below. It has a fibrous capsule and, except at its hilum, is covered by peritoneum, which is reflected as supporting ligaments running to adjacent organs; the lienorenal, lienogastric and lienocolic ligaments. The phrenicocolic ligament, which runs between the splenic flexure of the colon and the under-surface of the diaphragm, provides additional support.

Arterial inflow is primarily through the tortuous splenic artery arising from the coeliac axis, which carries 40% of the splanchnic blood flow into the spleen. Venous blood drains into the portal venous system via the splenic vein. The splenic vessels are closely related to, and may run within the pancreas entering the spleen at the splenic hilum, the only part of the spleen without a peritoneal covering. The spleen has a secondary vascular inflow and outflow via the short gastric vessels that run within the lienogastric ligament to the upper part of the greater curvature of the stomach, which assume importance when the main splenic vessels are occluded through surgical division, radiological embolization or spontaneous thrombosis.

Normally, the spleen is impalpable and cannot be percussed. When enlarged, it extends downwards and medially below the costal margin. It is then best palpated bimanually, with the patient lying on the right side with the left side turned slightly forward. The distinctive notch on the antero-inferior border of the spleen may then be felt. On percussion, an enlarged spleen causes dullness over the ninth rib in the mid-axillary line. Splenomegaly is normally confirmed by abdominal ultrasound or CT scan.

Physiology

Technique of splenectomy

Preoperative preparation

As many of the indications (Table 15.4) are for haematological conditions, preparation requires multidisciplinary management to ensure preoperative optimization of full blood count and coagulation status, and usually involves a further course of steroids or administration of blood products. Vaccines are best administered two weeks before surgery.

Table 15.4 Indications for splenectomy.

Traumatic Blunt / penetrating trauma
Iatrogenic intraoperative / endoscopic trauma
Haematological The purpuras
Haemolytic anaemia
Hypersplenism
Proliferative disease
Miscellaneous Distal pancreatectomy (for benign or malignant disease)
Proximal gastrectomy
Splenorenal shunt

Open technique

For an elective splenectomy, access is usually gained via a left subcostal incision. Rarely, a thoracoabdominal incision is necessary to remove a large spleen. A normal-sized non-adherent spleen is approached by initial division of the diaphragmatic attachments and the lienorenal ligament allowing the spleen to be folded forward, improving access to the organ. Division of the short gastric vessels exposes the splenic hilum and the vessels divided either between ligatures or using a vascular stapling device, taking care to avoid injury to the tail of the pancreas. Division of the remaining peritoneal attachments allows removal of the organ.

When the spleen is enlarged or adherent to surrounding organs or the diaphragm, preliminary mobilization may not be possible and the vascular pedicle is dissected first. Alternatively, the splenic artery may first be ligated in continuity so that the spleen shrinks in size, allowing it to be mobilized and the vessels to be ligated close to the splenic hilum. Drains are not routinely used (as they may actually increase the incidence of subphrenic sepsis), unless there is a possibility that the tail of the pancreas has been injured or there is persistent oozing due to a coagulation defect.

Traumatic splenectomy

In the majority of situations which require an emergency splenectomy for trauma (Table 15.5), the potential for injury is relatively obvious through a history of blunt or penetrating trauma. Delayed presentation, an unusual mechanism (e.g. post-colonoscopy) or the absence of a history through intoxication make a high index of suspicion essential. In addition, in patients with splenic enlargement, the mechanism may be relatively trivial. The cardinal features are those of significant blood loss, and local signs of peritoneal irritation (peritonitis or left shoulder tip pain).

Table 15.5 The American Association for the Surgery of Trauma classification of splenic trauma.

Grade Injury Description
I Haematoma Subcapsular, < 10% of surface area
  Laceration Capsular tear < 1 cm parenchymal depth
II Haematoma Subcapsular, 10–50% of surface area,
Intraparenchymal, < 5 cm in diameter
  Laceration 1–3 cm parenchymal depth which does not involve a trabecular vessel
III Haematoma Subcapsular, > 50% of surface area, or expanding
Ruptured subcapsular or parenchymal haematoma
Laceration Intraparenchymal haematoma > 5 cm or expanding
IV Laceration Laceration involving segmental or hilar vessels producing major devascularization (> 25% of spleen)
V Laceration Massive disruption of pancreatic head
  Vascular Hilar vascular injury which devascularizes spleen

Patients that do not respond to initial resuscitation require an emergency laparotomy and usually a splenectomy along with a careful exploratory laparotomy to exclude injury to other structures. In the responding patient, cross-sectional imaging is advised.

Approximately 80% of splenic injuries may be managed conservatively, and of these the requirement for intervention is apparent within 72 hours in 95%. In the unstable patient, control of haemorrhage and restoration of circulating volume are paramount and consideration regarding organ preservation is of secondary importance. Unlike an elective splenectomy a midline laparotomy is usually performed with packing of the left upper quadrant which will normally control the splenic haemorrhage to allow the remainder of the abdomen to be examined. Having excluded other sources of haemorrhage, if examination of the spleen reveals bleeding from the splenic hilum, preservation is not appropriate and a splenectomy should be performed.

Indications for splenectomy (non-traumatic)

Although the recommendation to remove the spleen often comes from the haematologist, the surgeon must be aware of the indications for splenectomy and the criteria that should be fulfilled before accepting a patient for operation. The common indications are outlined below.

The purpuras

Hypersplenism

This syndrome consists of splenomegaly and pancytopenia in the presence of an apparently normal bone marrow and the absence of an autoimmune disorder. There is sequestration and destruction of blood cells in the spleen, affecting predominantly white cells and platelets. Hypersplenism may complicate a number of inflammatory conditions (e.g. rheumatoid arthritis), infections (e.g. malaria), and myeloproliferative and lymphoproliferative disorders. In portal hypertension, splenic congestion frequently leads to splenomegaly and hypersplenism.

The enlarged spleen results in an expansion of the total blood volume to fill the increased vascular spaces of the enlarged spleen with pooling of cells and increased destruction within the sinusioids. This results in anaemia, leucopenia and thrombocytopenia, with reticulocytosis and leucoerythroblastosis in the marrow. Increased haemoglobin turnover results in increased amounts of urobilinogen in the urine. Splenectomy may be appropriate but the potential morbidity, the risks of late septic complications and the prognosis of the underlying cause of the hypersplenism require to be balanced with the potential alleviation of the pancytopenia.

Miscellaneous conditions

Share this: