The Musculoskeletal System

Published on 02/03/2015 by admin

Filed under Internal Medicine

Last modified 22/04/2025

Print this page

rate 1 star rate 2 star rate 3 star rate 4 star rate 5 star
Your rating: none, Average: 0 (0 votes)

This article have been viewed 2459 times

Chapter 21 The Musculoskeletal System

Generalities

This is a difficult area of physical exam, but one necessary in ambulatory medicine and often rewarding. One of 10 patients presenting to a primary care office will do so because of musculoskeletal complaints. Most of these can be diagnosed through a thorough exam, specific maneuvers (Table 21-1), and a proper knowledge of joints’ anatomy and physiology.

Table 21-1 Joint Diseases—Specific Maneuvers

Joint Problem Maneuver
Shoulder General Painful arc sign
  Acromioclavicular (AC) arthritis Cross-body and cross-arm maneuvers
  Bicipital tendinitis Yergason’s and Speed’s tests
  Rotator cuff pathology Gerber’s lift-off test, drop arm test, empty can test
  Impingement Neer (impingement) and Hawkins-Kennedy tests
  Anterior shoulder instability Apprehension and Jobe’s relocation tests
  Inferior shoulder instability Sulcus sign
  Glenoid labral tears O’Brien’s and anterior slide tests
Elbow Cubital tunnel syndrome Elbow flexion test
Wrist Carpal tunnel syndrome Tinel’s sign, Phalen’s sign, flick sign
  Rheumatoid arthritis Piano key sign
  De Quervain’s tendinitis Finkelstein test (positive)
  Intersection syndrome Finkelstein test (negative)
Hand Interosseous tightness versus capsular contraction Bunnel-Littler test
Hip General FABER maneuver
Knee Patellofemoral syndrome Patellofemoral grinding test
  Effusion Bulge sign, patellar ballottement, fluid wave test
  Anterior cruciate ligament Lachman’s test, anterior drawer test, lateral pivot shift test
  Posterior cruciate ligament Posterior drawer test, tibial sag test
  Meniscal tears Medial-lateral grind test, McMurray’s test, Apley’s grind and distraction test
Ankle Anterior talofibular tear Anterior drawer test
  Anterior talofibular/calcaneofibular tear “Talar tilt” test
  Tibiofibular syndesmosis “Squeeze” test
  Tarsal tunnel syndrome Submalleolar tap

A. The Shoulder

15 Describe the muscles and tendons of the shoulder

image The rotator cuff consists of four muscles: supraspinatus, infraspinatus, teres minor, and subscapularis (mnemonic, SITS). Their tendons converge on the humerus, thus allowing for most of the joint movements (abduction of the arm and rotation of the shoulder, both internal and external). They also hold the humeral head in the glenoid cavity, thus stabilizing the joint.

image The deltoid is the largest and strongest muscle, responsible for the later part of abduction and flexion once the arm has been lifted by the supraspinatus. It is visible but rarely injured.

image The biceps has two proximal heads (hence, the name), which insert into the shoulder: (1) the long head tendon and (2) the short head of the biceps. The long head tendon lies in the bicipital groove of the humerus, between the greater and lesser tuberosities and under the transverse humeral ligament. This arrangement prevents the humeral head from sliding too far during abduction and external rotation. At the upper end of the groove, the long head of the biceps angles 90   degrees inward, crossing the humeral head and eventually inserting itself into the upper edge of the glenoid labrum and supraglenoid tubercle. The short head of the biceps connects instead on the coracoid process. Distally, the two heads of the biceps merge to form the body of the biceps brachii muscle, which inserts itself into the radius through its common distal head. The biceps is a powerful flexor and supinator of the forearm (i.e., it rotates forearm and hand so that the palm faces upward).

16 What are the shoulder’s movements? How do you test its ROM?

The shoulder can actively abduct, adduct, externally and internally rotate, flex, and extend. It has the largest ROM of any joint, since it provides mobility not only to the girdle but also to the hand. ROM is tested as follows:

If active ROM elicits pain, evaluate the same movements through passive ROM. To provide your patient with adequate support (and thus ensure maximal relaxation), gently rest one hand on his/her shoulder while using your other hand to move the humerus through the same ROM as previously discussed. Look for pain and crepitus. Pain and limitation on active, but not passive, ROM indicate muscular or tendinous problems. Crepitus suggests instead degenerative joint disease.

19 What is the general approach to the shoulder exam?

Always expose both shoulders (and watch while the patient removes the shirt). Then carry out a systematic exam: inspect, palpate, assess ROM, measure strength, evaluate neurologically, and perform special shoulder tests. Also, examine the cervical spine and upper extremity.

33 How do you diagnose rotator cuff tendinitis?

By carefully examining the shoulder and by knowing the function of the four rotator cuff muscles (i.e., abduction, external rotation, and internal rotation).

image The supraspinatus is the most important and most commonly damaged of the four. It links the top of the scapula to the humerus, inserting into its greater tuberosity. It is partially responsible for arm abduction (the initial 15–30   degrees are actually produced by the deltoid, the next 60   degrees by the supraspinatus, and the final 90   degrees by the deltoid again). Hence, inflammation of the supraspinatus tendon leads to pain at 30–90   degrees of abduction, as the humerus impinges the tendon against the acromion. It can be easily tested through the empty can test.

image The infraspinatus produces external rotation of the humerus, a function assisted by the teres minor. The two also cooperate to maintain glenohumeral stability. To test external rotators (infraspinatus and teres minor): (1) have the patient abduct both shoulders to 20–30   degrees, while keeping the elbows flexed at 90   degrees; (2) instruct the patient to push the arms outward (externally rotate) against resistance. External rotation elicits pain in tendinitis and weakness in tears.

image The subscapularis is the only of the four rotator muscles to originate from the anterior surface of the scapula (the others arise instead in the back). It connects the scapula to the humerus, serving as humeral head depressor and, in certain shoulder positions (adduction), as internal rotator. Function is evaluated through the “Gerber’s lift-off test”: (1) have patients place the hand behind the back, with palm facing out, and (2) instruct them to lift the hand away from the back and against resistance. Internal rotation elicits pain in tendinitis and weakness in tears.

Note that given the anatomic closeness of the long head tendon of the biceps (which passes down the bicipital groove in a fibrous sheath between the subscapularis and supraspinatus tendons), patients with rotator cuff disease also may have biceps tendinitis (see questions 27 and 28).

50 How do you test for anterior shoulder instability?

Through the apprehension and Jobe’s relocation tests. Start with “apprehension” (Fig. 21-2). To perform it, ask patients to lie supine, with the affected shoulder just off the examining table. Grasp the elbow with one hand, and gently bring the arm to 90-degree abduction and 90-degree external rotation. Then push with your other hand on the posterior aspect of the humeral head, from back to front. Anterior shoulder instability will give a feeling that the arm is about to pop out of the joint. At the same time, patients will experience pain, apprehension, and guarding. In the original series of Rowe and Zarins, all 60 cases of anterior shoulder instability had a positive apprehension test. If the patient experiences pain and/or apprehension, move on to the second part of the maneuver: the Jobe’s relocation test. This is performed in the same position, but this time by pushing on the anterior aspect of the humeral head, from front to back, as if relocating a glenohumeral joint that had been partially dislocated by the apprehension test. Patients with primary impingement will have no change in pain, whereas those with anterior instability (subluxation) and secondary impingement will have relief of pain and/or apprehension. When relying primarily on relief of apprehension, the relocation test has sensitivity for anterior instability of 68%; specificity, 100%; positive predictive value, 100%; negative predictive value, 78%; and accuracy, 85%.

image

Figure 21-2 Apprehension test.

(From Mellion MB: Office Sports Medicine, 2nd ed. Philadelphia, Hanley & Belfus, 1998.)

B. The Elbow

C. The Wrist

D. The Hand

107 What is a trigger finger?

The most common entrapment tendinitis, 20   times more frequent than de Quervain’s. It is a painful condition characterized by locking of the affected finger in flexion (Fig. 21-6). This is usually due to tenosynovitis of the flexor tendon to the digit (hence, its term of flexor tendinitis) resulting in palpable swelling of the tendon itself, often nodular. Alternatively, it may be due to inflammation and swelling of the sheath surrounding the tendon. Either way, the tendon becomes unable to glide smoothly through the sheath. Hence, whenever the patient forces the finger to bend, there may be a painful snap as the tendon passes through the thickened portion of the sheath into its final flexed position. Then, given its inability to glide back into the sheath, the tendon will stay flexed. With more vigorous attempts, either by increased force from the finger extensors or by application of an external force (such as use of the other hand), the finger will eventually extend, usually with another (and often painful) snap as the tendon passes back through the thickened portion of the sheath—like a trigger being pulled and released. Yet, in more severe cases the finger will remain locked. Women are more affected than men, especially musicians, writers, gardeners, and hobbyists, since all these occupations require repetitive gripping actions. Treatment varies, depending on the severity of the condition, ranging from rest, to medications, to surgery.

110 What are Heberden’s nodes?

They are painless nodules on the distal interphalangeal joints (Fig. 21-8). These may involve one or more fingers, but typically spare the thumb. The overlying skin is normal, and the nodes are hard, 2–3   mm in diameter, not interfering with fingers’ movement, twin in presentation, and typically located on the lateral and medial dorsal surface of the DIP (if affecting the PIP, the nodes are instead called Bouchard’s). Both reflect localized osteoarthritis. Hence, they are more common in the elderly. Involvement of a single joint is more prevalent in men, whereas multiple involvement is more frequent in women, where the condition is usually postmenopausal and hereditary.

111 Who were Heberden and Bouchard?

image William Heberden (1710–1801) was an English physician, who studied in Cambridge and practiced in London at the local university. A devout Christian, he was a leading Latin and Hebrew scholar, referred to by Samuel Johnson as “the last of the Romans” (“Dr. Heberden ultimus Romanorum—the last of our learned physicians”). In fact, his reputation as the master clinician of his times eventually gained him a position at the court of King George (the same “mad George” who lost the American colonies) as personal physician to the Queen. He was only 51. His contributions to medicine are indeed staggering, including the aforementioned nodules but also classic descriptions of angina, chickenpox, and night blindness. A lifelong sufferer from gout (which he described masterfully in his “Commentaries on the History and Cure of Diseases”), Dr. Heberden was also able to recognize that his eponymous osteoarthritic nodes (“digitorum nodi”) were not gouty in origin. In Chapter 28 of the “Commentaries” he wrote:

He spent the last 20 years of his life writing his book, commenting that the life of a physician comes in three phases: in the first one you acquire knowledge, in the second one you apply it, and in the third (and last) one you teach it. Words that still ring true today.

image Charles J. Bouchard (1837–1915) was a French pathologist, who studied under Charcot, and then produced the first description of spider nevi in chronic liver disease.

131 Can the fingers provide a clue to a patient’s sexual orientation?

Maybe. In a recent Nature study, researchers from Berkeley suggested that the length of the index and ring fingers might indeed statistically predict sexual orientation. According to their theory, womb exposure to high levels of androgens would shorten the index fingers of males, causing them to become a little smaller than the ring fingers. Women would have instead indices that are either longer or, at least, equal to their ring fingers. Researchers carried out their study by going to street fairs in San Francisco and persuading more than 700 fairgoers to have copies of their hands made on portable photocopying machines. They also inquired about family histories and sexual orientations. By doing so, they discovered that gay men have indices even shorter than those of straight men. And, more interestingly, that gay men also have a much greater number of older brothers. And so their theory speculates that womb exposure to even higher levels of androgens (as in cases of many preceding male siblings) would paradoxically induce a gay sexual orientation. This hypermasculinization would be the reason why, according to the same researchers, gay men often have longer genitalia and subtle differences in brain structure. It would also explain the finger pattern of gay women, which is very similar to that of straight men (i.e., indices shorter than ring fingers), similarly related to high womb exposure to androgens. What is really interesting, though, is that the role of the middle finger hasn’t yet been clarified. Maybe in a future study. On a partially related note, Romans-of-old also believed in connections between fertility and fingers—especially the fourth finger of the left hand, which they thought linked to the heart through a unique nerve. That is why they used to “chain” it at time of marriage by putting a ring around it, as a sign of enslavement of both heart and passions. And inside that ring they engraved the words: “Ubi Tu Gaia, Ego Gaius; Ubi Ego Gaius, Tu Gaia” (When you are happy, I am happy; and when I am happy, you are happy”). In other words, reciprocal tolerance is key to a successful marriage—good advice for all times.

E. The Head and Neck

F. The Thoracic Spine

G. The Lumbar Spine

150 What is Schober’s test?

It is a bedside assessment of lumbar spine flexibility. It measures the degree of lumbar forward flexion, as the patient bends over while attempting to touch the toes (Fig. 21-11). It is carried out as follows: with the patient standing up straight, draw a line at the level of the posterior iliac spine. This corresponds to L5/S1 (i.e., the dimples of Venus, DV). Place a mark on the spine 5  cm below this line and another 10  cm above the line, so that the distance between the two is 15   cm. Then instruct the patient to touch his or her toes (i.e., to maximally flex forward the lumbar spine). If the increase in distance between the marks is <5   cm, the patient has reduced lumbar flexion—an early sign of ankylosing spondylitis in young individuals and degenerative disease in older ones.

image

Figure 21-11 Schober’s test.

(From Mellion MB, Walsh WM, Shelton GL: The Team Physician’s Handbook, 2nd ed. Philadelphia, Hanley & Belfus, 1997.)

158 What is the Lasègue test? How is it performed?

Lasègue is the straight-leg raising (SLR) test (Fig. 21-12), a maneuver aimed at detecting lumbosacral nerve root irritation/compression, as in patients with disk prolapse and sciatica. To carry it out:

image Ask the patient to lay supine and with the legs straight.

image id=”u0600″/>Raise one leg with the knee fully extended (so to stretch the sciatic nerve) until the patient experiences radicular pain (i.e., pain referred down the buttock→ thigh→ calf [L4 irritation→ radiation to medial calf; L5→ lateral calf; S1→ lateral foot]).

image The test is positive only if: (1) pain occurs when the leg is lifted 30–70   degrees from the horizontal and (2) pain travels down the leg until below the knee, not solely in the back or the hamstrings. Note that pain in the low back is not a positive test. Posterior thigh pain is not a classic sign either, but may occur in mild sciatica.

image Record the angle at which pain occurred. A normal value is 80–90   degrees. An elevation of the leg to <70   degrees is clearly abnormal, and yet pain that occurs before the leg is raised to 30   degrees cannot be due to disk prolapse, since this angle is too small to stretch the nerve root.

image Perform the sciatic stretch test. During a standard straight-leg raise, apply dorsiflexion to the foot (flip test). This maneuver further stretches the nerve and thus increases the pain. A reverse flip test consists of applying plantar flexion of the foot. This should typically lessen the pain. If not, it suggests malingering.

image Flex the knee. This may relieve the buttock pain, since flexion of the knee causes neither stretching nor sliding of the nerve root. Conversely, when the leg is raised with the knee fully extended, up to 1.5   inches of nerve root will slide in and out of the exit foramina of the spine.

image Sitting straight-leg raising (knee extension) test. The patient sits on the table edge with both the hips and knees flexed at 90   degrees and extends the knee slowly. This maneuver stretches the lower nerve roots as much as a moderate degree of supine SLR. If positive, it will reproduce sciatica symptoms, with pain radiating below the knee.

image

Figure 21-12 Lasègue (straight-leg raise) test.

(From Shankar K, Nayak N, Dowdell BC: Commonly used clinical tests and gait abnormalities. Phys Med Rehabil State Art Rev 10:631–652, 1996.)

163 How else can one separate organic from nonorganic back pain?

By the Waddell’s signs. In 1980, Waddell et al. reported eight signs (referred to as behavioral signs) that in a prospective study of 26 findings in 350 patient evaluations were consistently capable of identifying non-organic back pain (Table 21-3).

Table 21-3 Waddell’s Signs

Sign Positive Finding*
Superficial tenderness Skin discomfort on palpation
Nonanatomic tenderness Tenderness that crosses multiple somatic boundaries
Axial loading Report of low back pain
Simulated rotation Report of back pain
Distracted straight-leg raise Report of pain in low back or posterior thigh; lessening of pain with continued leg raising; severe pain at 10-degree flexion in patient with no apparent disability
Regional sensory change “Stocking” or global distribution of numbness
Regional weakness Sudden, uneven weakness (e.g., “cogwheeling,” “dithering”) in patient with normal strength on muscle testing
Overreaction to examination Exaggerated, non-reproducible response to stimulus (grimacing, sighing, guarding, bracing, rubbing)

* The predictive value is greatly improved when three or more positive signs are present.

(Adapted from Waddell G, McCulloch JA, Kummel E, et al: Nonorganic physical signs in low-back pain. Spine 5:117?125, 1980; and from Main CJ, Waddel G: Behavioral responses to examination: A reappraisal of the interpretation of nonorganic signs. Spine 23:2367?2371, 1998.)

164 Who was Lasègue?

Ernest-Charles Lasègue was a French internist (1816–1883), who, after contemplating a career in philosophy, got convinced by a mesmerizing lecture of Trousseau to become instead a physician. After struggling in medical school (he shared a room at the Latin Quarter with Claude Bernard, often wasting rent money on experimental guinea pigs and rabbits), Lasègue became Trousseau’s favorite student and close collaborator, eventually delivering in 1867 his eulogy—one of the finest in French language. He himself died at 67 of diabetic complications. A beloved teacher and prolific writer, Lasègue had a special interest in psychiatry, especially psychosomatic diseases. In fact, it was his desire to develop tests and maneuvers that could trap malingerers that eventually led to the discovery of the homonymous sign. As a person, Lasègue was witty, empathetic, and a strong supporter of arts and humanities (in defending a liberal education, he compared the time spent on humanities to the time spent by a soldier polishing his armor). Pierre Astruc relates how Lasègue discovered his homonymous sign:

Still, the sign did not appear in Lasègue’s Considération sur la sciatique. It was only years later that his pupil J.J. Forst put the sign on record.

172 What are the physical findings of patients with low back pain?

They vary from patient to patient. Focus your exam on:

Table 21-4 Functional Muscle Testing

Nerve Root Motor Exam Functional Test
L3 Extend quadriceps Squat down and rise
L4 Dorsiflex ankle Walk on heels
L5 Dorsiflex great toe Walk on heels
S1 Stand on toes Walk on toes (plantarflex ankle)

179 What is a Trendelenburg’s gait?

A typical gait of gluteal muscle weakness (see Chapter 1, questions 75–80). While stepping from one leg to the other, the glutei are unable to hold up the pelvis, causing it to sag on the unsupported side. As a result, the “swinging” limb may become too low to clear the ground, causing the patient to compensate in one of two ways: (1) by leaning away from the unsupported side, trying to raise the swinging leg in the typical “waddling” fashion of progressive muscular dystrophy (so called because its gait resembles that of a duck), or (2) by stepping very high on the unsupported side, so that the swinging leg can clear the ground (“high steppage gait”).

H. The Sacroiliac Joint

I. The Hip

199 How should one approach a patient with hip pain?

By first localizing the pain, since anterior, lateral, and posterior pains have different etiologies.

200 How should one examine the hip of a patient complaining of pain?

By first observing the patient’s gait, which is going to be antalgic. Then by assessing range of motion of the hip (both active and passive), and carefully comparing the affected and normal side. Hip flexion; internal and external rotation; and flexion, abduction, and external rotation (FABER) should be tested, too. The most predictive finding for osteoarthritis (DJD) is a decreased range of motion—especially in internal rotation or abduction. For patients with restricted movement in one plane, the sensitivity for DJD is 100% and specificity is 42%; with restricted movement in three planes, the sensitivity is 54% and specificity 88%, with a likelihood ratio of 4.4. To ensure that the source of pain is not muscular, muscle strength also should be tested (by doing resisted hip flexion, adduction, abduction, external rotation, and extension). Specialized hip maneuvers should then be carried out. These include not only the Thomas test, FABER, and “snapping hip,” but also Ober’s test. In this test, the patient lies on the side while the examiner abducts and extends the affected hip before releasing the leg and allowing it to drop onto the examination table. Lateral hip pain or considerable tightness may indicate iliotibial band syndrome. Finally, evaluation of hip pain should include palpation of individual structures, like hip flexor muscles, greater trochanter, iliotibial band, and gluteus medius muscle—all maneuvers that can further localize the source of pain. Tenderness over anterior soft tissues would suggest a hip flexor muscle strain (or iliopsoas bursitis), whereas tenderness over the greater trochanter would indicate a trochanteric bursitis.

J. The Knee

213 What are the most common types of knee misalignment?

“Genu varum” and “valgum.” Varum is an angulation of the knees away from each other. Valgum is instead an angulation of the knees toward each other. Both can be congenital or acquired. A less-common condition is windswept knees, where one knee is varum and the other valgum (see Fig. 21-14). If the use of these terms seems to contradict that of question 62, is because of their etymology, considering that in Latin valgum means “knock-kneed,” while varum means “bowlegged.” In other words, in a knock-kneed person, the femur is deviated inward in relation to the hip (and thus the term varum is correctly applied for the hip, since it refers to the distal segment being angled inward). Yet, in the same knock-kneed person, the opposite situation is found at the knee, with its distal segment (i.e., the tibia) now being deviated outward (so that the term valgum is indeed the one to use for the knee). Hence, it is correct for a knock-kneed deformity to be called both varum (at the hip/femur) and valgum (at the knee/tibia), although the common terminology is to refer to it as genu valgum. Conversely, in a varum deformity of the knee, the distal part of the leg below the knee is deviated inward, resulting in a bowlegged appearance. If this is confusing, just remember that “varum = inward” and “valgum = outward,” and that both terms always refer to the direction in which the distal part of the joint points. When the terminology specifies a bone rather than a joint, the bone is taken to be the distal segment of a joint. Thus, a varum deformity of the tibia refers to the femur/tibia joint (the knee) and not to the ankle.

image

Figure 21-14 Normal alignment and malalignment of the knee.

(From Staheli LT: Pediatric Orthopaedic Secrets. Philadelphia, Hanley & Belfus, 1998.)

240 How do you assess the collateral ligaments?

Hold the knee in your hand, freely relaxed and in approximately 15   degrees of flexion (to avoid locking in full extension). Apply first a varus stress (pressure on the medial aspect of the joint to test the lateral collateral ligament, LCL), and then a valgus stress (pressure on the lateral aspect of the knee, to test the medial collateral ligament, MCL). More specifically, for the MCL, push inward with your left hand along the lateral aspect of the knee, while at the same time applying an opposite force with your right hand. If the MCL is completely torn, the joint will “open up” along the medial aspect. For the LCL, do the opposite: place your right hand along the medial aspect of the knee, place your left hand on the ankle or calf, and push outward with your right hand while applying an opposite force with your left. If the LCL is completely torn, the joint will “open up” along the lateral aspect. An alternative way to test the collateral ligaments consists in cradling the lower leg, and then pressing with your fingers first to the lateral side of the knee (to test the medial collateral ligament) and then to the medial side (to test the lateral collateral ligament). Do this first with the knee flexed at 15   degrees and then at 30   degrees. Any pain or abnormal opening of the joint space indicates instability. When used for the MCL, this maneuver eliminates the medial meniscus from contributing to knee stability and thus tests primarily the MCL.

246 What are the physical findings of a meniscal tear?

image Antalgic gait. Limping is very common, since patients may be unable to bear weight and thus exhibit antalgic deviations or compensatory movements.

image Effusion may be evident on knee inspection and be subsequently confirmed by ballottement or the fluid wave test.

image Atrophy of the quadriceps may result from long-standing injury and the patient’s inability to achieve full extension.

image Knee girth can help identify effusions and atrophy. It should be measured at the joint line if looking for effusion, at 5 and 20  cm proximal to the base of the patella if looking for quadriceps’ atrophy, and at 15  cm distal to the apex of the patella if looking for calf atrophy.

image id=”u1190″/>On palpation, the most accurate finding is localized tenderness at the joint line. To detect it, ask the patient to slightly flex the knee, then identify the joint line and gently palpate along its medial and lateral margins. Note that (1) the maneuver only assesses the part of the meniscus that is near the joint line (the remainder is not examinable) and (2) location of tenderness is not a fail-proof indication of the type of meniscal lesion.

image Locking. If an anterior tear blocks the motion, there may be difficulty extending the knee. This limits ROM to 20–45   degrees of joint extension, with clicks or snaps after it unlocks arguing strongly for a meniscal lesion (bounce home test). Conversely, a posterior tear may render a full flexion painful or just impossible, as in squatting (Childress test).

image Forced knee flexion may instead cause medial or lateral pain.

image Finally, popliteal masses or cysts should be searched for, since a Baker’s cyst (see questions 255 and 256) often coexists with chronic meniscal tears.

249 What is the McMurray test? How do you perform it?

McMurray is a test of meniscal tears of the middle or posterior horn. For tears of the medial meniscus, apply a valgus force and externally rotate the foot while extending the knee. For tears of the lateral meniscus, apply instead a varus force and internally rotate the foot while extending the knee. More specifically: with patients supine and the right knee and hip fully flexed, place your left thumb on the lateral joint margin, while keeping middle, index, and ring fingers aligned along the medial margins. Then use the right hand to passively extend the leg, flex it, and extend it again, but this time with an external rotation of the leg. To do so, first turn the ankle so that the foot points outward (everted). Then point the knee outward (valgus stress). In this everted position, first extend and then flex the knee. The test is positive for medial meniscal injury when (1) it elicits pain with extension of the knee and external rotation of the leg; (2) it elicits a palpable, audible click or pop over the meniscus; or (3) it elicits locking of the knee. After this is done, flex and extend the knee again, but this time after internal rotation. To do so, turn the foot inward (inversion), and then direct the knee so that it points inward as well (varus stress). Once again, the test is indicative of lateral meniscal injury when (1) it elicits pain with extension of the knee and internal rotation of the leg, (2) it elicits a palpable click over the meniscus, or (3) it elicits locking of the knee. Pops, snaps, and clicks are produced as the torn meniscal fragment rides over the femoral condyle during extension. An audible or palpable pop in extreme flexion indicates a posterior horn tear; a click at 90   degrees of flexion indicates a lesion in the midsection of the meniscus.

252 How accurate are these tests?

Not as accurate as the maneuvers for evaluation of ligamentous injuries. Using arthroscopy as a reference standard, bedside evaluation has sensitivity of 77% and specificity of 91%, with a positive LR of 2.7 and a negative LR of 0.4. Still, one third of meniscal tears may be missed by clinical screening. Moreover, exam cannot demonstrate location, shape, or length of the tear—something that MRI does instead very well. As for individual findings, joint-line tenderness has a mean sensitivity of 79% and a specificity of 15%, with an LR of 0.9 for a positive test and 1.1 for a negative test. Hence, it is not a super finding, even though its accuracy may be greater for tears of the lateral meniscus as compared to those of the medial one. Of the various maneuvers, the medial-lateral grind test is the most accurate, with sensitivity of 69% and specificity of 86%; McMurray is most helpful when positive, with a sensitivity and specificity of 53% and 59%, respectively, and a positive LR of 1.3 and a negative LR of 0.8. Apley has instead a sensitivity so low (about 16%) that many authors even discourage its use. In a series of 100 meniscal tears, at least one of these maneuvers was positive in 79% of the cases. Yet, accuracy may decrease significantly in patients with multiple knee lesions (down to 30%). For example, in cases of acute ACL tear, the sensitivity for associated medial meniscus tear is 45% and for lateral meniscus tear is 58%. Finally, concomitant presence of a joint effusion lowers the sensitivity for meniscal tear to 35% (specificity, though, is a solid 100%). Overall, exam is more specific than sensitive.

K. The Ankle and the Foot

269 What are pes cavus and pes planus?

The two most common foot deformities (Fig. 21-15). A pes cavus has an abnormally high longitudinal arch, whereas a planus has lost the arch completely (i.e., flat foot). This loss may be flexible or fixed, insofar as a flexible flat foot has some discernible arch at rest, but loses it with weight-bearing, whereas a fixed flat foot lacks the arch even at rest.

image

Figure 21-15 A, Pes planus (flat foot). B, Pes cavus (high-arched foot).

(From Mellion MB, Walsh WM, Shelton GL: The Team Physician’s Handbook, 2nd ed. Philadelphia, Hanley & Belfus, 1997.)

276 What is Morton’s neuroma? How is it demonstrated?

Morton’s is not a true neuroma but rather a perineural fibrosis and nerve degeneration of the common digital nerve (Fig. 21-16). This also is the result of repetitive friction, usually from ill-fitting shoes. It develops most frequently between the third and fourth metatarsal heads (i.e., third web space), but is also found in the second web space. Morton first described it in 1876:

image

Figure 21-16 Morton’s neuroma.

(From Mellion MB, Walsh WM, Shelton GL: The Team Physician’s Handbook, 2nd ed. Philadelphia, Hanley & Belfus, 1997.)

This Dr. Thomas George Morton (1835?1903) was a Philadelphia born and educated surgeon, who became head physician of many local hospitals (including St. Mary’s, Wills Eye, and the Pennsylvania Hospital), until dying of cholera at age 68. Active during the American Civil War, he was for most of his life a hospital administrator, but also a charismatic teacher and an excellent practitioner. In fact, he was one of the first surgeons who were able to remove an appendix after a correct diagnosis, and see the patient survive. His eponymous condition is a rather frequent one, affecting females five times more than males (because of narrower and more pointed shoes?). The most common presentation is sharp and burning pain in the forefoot and toes adjacent to the neuroma. There also may be numbness, often during episodes of pain. In fact, pain is typically intermittent, single or in multiple attacks, with episodes lasting minutes to hours and followed by asymptomatic periods of weeks to months. Patients often describe the sensation of “walking on a marble.” Firm squeezing of the metatarsal head with one hand, while applying direct pressure to the dorsal and plantar interspace with the other hand, may reproduce the pain. Conversely, palpation of the actual neuroma is rarely successful.

286 What is tarsal tunnel syndrome (TTS)?

It is to the ankle what carpal tunnel syndrome is to the wrist: an entrapment of the tibial nerve or its associated branches as they pass underneath the flexor retinaculum at the medial malleolus (Fig. 21-17). This leads to numbness, tingling, and pain along the posterior tibial nerve (medial plantar surface of the foot, from first toe to heel). It also may cause motor dysfunction, weakness, and atrophy.

image

Figure 21-17 Tarsal tunnel syndrome.

(From Mellion MB, Walsh WM, Shelton GL: The Team Physician’s Handbook, 2nd ed. Philadelphia, Hanley & Belfus, 1997.)

Selected Bibliography

1 Ad Hoc Committee. Guidelines for the initial evaluation of the adult patient with acute musculoskeletal symptoms. Arthritis Rheum. 1996;39:1-6.

2 Anderson AF, Lipscomb AB. Clinical diagnosis of meniscal tears. Description of a new manipulative test. Am J Sports Med. 1986;14:291-293.

3 Castro WHM, Jerosch J, Grossman TW. Examination and Diagnosis of Musculoskeletal Disorders. Clinical Examinations: Imaging Modalities. New York, Thieme, 2001.

4 Chaudhuri R, Salari R. Baker’s cyst simulating deep vein thrombosis. Clin Radiol. 1990;41:400-404.

5 Cozen L. Tests for chronic back pain. Contemp Orthop. 1992;24:405-410.

6 D’Arcy CA, McGee S. Does this patient have carpal tunnel syndrome? JAMA. 2000;283:3110-3117.

7 Deville WL, van der Windt DA, Dzaferagic A. The test of Lasegue: Accuracy in herniated discs. Spine. 2000;25:1140-1147.

8 Hawkes CH. Diagnosis of functional neurological disease. Br J Hosp Med. 1997;57:373-377.

9 Jackson JL, O’Malley PG, Kroenke K. Evaluation of acute knee pain in primary care. Ann Intern Med. 2003;139:575-588.

10 Main CJ, Waddell G. Nonorganic signs. Spine. 1998;23:2367-2371.

11 Margo K, Drezner J, Motzkin D. Evaluation and management of hip pain. J Fam Pract. 2004;53:420.

12 Morton TG. Peculiar painful affection of fourth MTP articulation. Am J Med Sci. 1876;71:37.

13 Solomon DH, Simel DL, Bates DW, et al. The rational clinical examination. Does this patient have a torn meniscus or ligament of the knee? Value of the physical examination. JAMA. 2001;286:1610-1620.

14 Sugrue D, McEvoy M, Dempsey J, et al. Diabetic stiff hand syndrome. Ir J Med Sci. 1983;152:152-156.

15 Waddell G, McCulloch JA, Kummel E, et al. Nonorganic physical signs in low-back pain. Spine. 1980;5:117-125.

16 Wipf JE, Deyo RA. Low back pain. Med Clin North Am. 1995;79:232-246.