The musculoskeletal system

Published on 02/03/2015 by admin

Filed under Basic Science

Last modified 02/03/2015

Print this page

rate 1 star rate 2 star rate 3 star rate 4 star rate 5 star
Your rating: none, Average: 0 (0 votes)

This article have been viewed 1302 times

Chapter 21 The musculoskeletal system

Short-lived and self-limiting inflammatory disorders are not normally treated with phytomedicines, but recently the use of some botanical preparations for chronic inflammatory conditions has become increasingly widespread. The use of analgesic and antiinflammatory drugs such as paracetamol, aspirin and ibuprofen is common for such conditions, but the side effects of these drugs can limit their acceptability. Non-steroidal antiinflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) act mainly via inhibition of cyclo-oxygenase (COX); enzymes, also known as prostaglandin synthases (PGS). At present three are known, COX-1, COX-2 and COX-3 (a splice variant of COX-1, sometimes referred to as COX-1b). Inhibition of COX-1 (e.g. with aspirin, ibuprofen and diclofenac) reduces levels of the gastroprotective prostaglandins, leading to inflammation of the gastrointestinal lining and even ulceration and bleeding. COX-2, however, is only induced in response to pro-inflammatory cytokines, and is not found in normal tissue (unlike COX-1). It is associated particularly with oedema and the nociceptive and pyretic effects of inflammation. Treatment with inhibitors of COX-2 does not produce such severe gastrointestinal side effects, but there are concerns about their cardiovascular safety. Other targets for treating inflammatory diseases include 5-lipoxygenase (LOX), NF-κB (which is activated in rheumatoid arthritis and other chronic inflammatory conditions), and certain cytokines which inhibit the activity of tumour necrosis factor-α (TNFα). Chronic expression of NO is also associated with various inflammatory conditions, including arthritis.

Drugs used in arthritis, rheumatism and muscle pain

The classic NSAID, aspirin, was originally developed as a result of studies on salicin, obtained from willow bark (see below and Chapter 15 and – for historical aspects – Chapter 3). Although it was thought at first that the effects of salicin were due only to the hydrolysed product salicylic acid, it is now known that plant antiinflammatory agents tend to have fewer gastrointestinal side effects than salicylates in general. There are also several combination herbal products on the market, for which little clinical data are available, but which are very popular and seem to produce few side effects.

Devil’s claw, Harpagophytum procumbens DC. ex Meissner (Harpagophyti radix) image

Devil’s claw (Pedaliaceae) has fairly recently been developed into a successful and relatively well-characterized medicine. The name arises from the claw-like appearance of the fruit. The secondary storage roots are collected in the savannahs of southern Africa (mainly the Kalahari Desert) and, while still fresh, they are cut into small pieces and dried. The main exporters are South Africa and Namibia. Devil’s claw was used traditionally as a tonic for ‘illnesses of the blood’, fever, kidney and bladder problems, during pregnancy and as an obstetric remedy for induction or acceleration of labour, as well as for expelling the retained placenta.

Constituents

The most important actives are considered to be the bitter iridoids, harpagide and harpagoside (Fig. 21.1), with 8-Op-coumaroylharpagide, procumbide, 6’-Op-coumaroylprocumbide, pagide and procumboside; the triterpenoids oleanolic and ursolic acids, β-sitosterol and a glycoside harproside. Other compounds present include phenylethyl glycosides such as verbascoside and isoacteoside, polyphenolic acids (caffeic, cinnamic, and chlorogenic acids), and flavonoids such as luteolin and kaempferol. According to the Eur. Ph. the drug must contain ≥ 1.2% harpagide and harpagoside, expressed as harpagoside.

Therapeutic uses and available evidence

In Europe, a tea (made from a dose of about 1.5 g/day of the powdered drug) has been used for the treatment of dyspeptic disorders such as indigestion and lack of appetite. This effect is due to the presence of bitter glycosides, the iridoids, which are present in large amounts.

Most pharmacological and clinical research has been conducted using standardized extracts for the treatment of rheumatic conditions and lower back pain. Several clinical studies, including some placebo-controlled double-blind trials, demonstrate the superiority of these extracts to placebo in patients with osteoarthritis, non-radicular back pain and other forms of chronic and acute pain. Other studies show their therapeutic equivalence to conventional forms of treatment. Devil’s claw is generally well tolerated and appears to be a suitable alternative to NSAIDs, which often have gastrointestinal side effects (for review, see Barnes 2009, Cameron et al 2009).

The mechanism of action is not fully known: fractions of the extract containing the highest concentration of harpagoside inhibited COX-1 and COX-2 activity and greatly inhibited NO production, whereas in contrast, the fraction containing mainly the other iridoids increased COX-2 and did not alter NO and COX-1 activities. A fraction containing mainly cinnamic acid was able to reduce only NO production (Anauate et al 2010). An extract of Harpagophytum procumbens showed a significant antiinflammatory effect in the rat adjuvant-induced chronic arthritis model, and harpagoside dose-dependently suppressed the lipopolysaccharide (LPS)-induced production of inflammatory cytokines (IL-1β, IL-6, and TNF-α) in mouse macrophage cells (Inaba et al 2010). These demonstrate that harpagoside is probably the main active constituent responsible for the effect of devil’s claw, but that other components from the crude extract can antagonize or increase the synthesis of inflammatory mediators. In summary, both the pharmacological mechanism and the compounds responsible for this activity have to be investigated further, and by in vivo methods. There are implications for the production methods for preparing devil’s claw extracts, and a recent study of the antiinflammatory activity of various commercial products has demonstrated that there is a great difference in their composition, and concludes that the harpagoside content is not a reliable method of predicting the therapeutic efficacy (Ouitas and Heard 2010). Extracts of devil’s claw are generally well tolerated but should not be used for patients with gastric or duodenal ulceration. The aqueous extract possesses spasmogenic, uterotonic action on rat uterine muscles (Mahomed and Ojewole 2009), leading credence to the folkloric obstetric uses, but suggesting that it should be avoided in pregnant women. Side effects include minor gastrointestinal upsets.

Rosehip, Rosa canina L. (Rosae Pseudofructus; also known as Rosae Fructus or Rosae Pseudofructus cum Fructibus)

The fruits of the wild or dog rose, Rosa canina (Rosaceae) are known as rosehips, and are botanically ‘pseudofruits’, composed of achenes enclosed in a fleshy receptacle or hypanthium. The trichomes found inside rose hips are irritant and are often removed before powdering the fruit. There are several types of rosehip preparation available: rosehip and seed (the ripe pseudofruits, including the seed); rosehip (the ripe seed receptacle, freed from seed and attached trichomes), and rosehip seed (the ripe, dried seed). The whole pseudofruit, i.e. rosehip with seed, is most commonly used and widely investigated.

Therapeutic uses and available evidence

Traditionally, rose hips were used as a source of vitamin C and were made into syrups for that purpose, but modern use is now focused on their antiinflammatory effects (for review, see Chrubasik et al 2008a). In a pilot surveillance study which included 152 patients with acute exacerbations of chronic pain, mainly of the lower back and knee, patients were recommended rose hip and seed powder at a dose providing up to 3 mg of galactolipid/day for up to 54 weeks. Multivariate analysis suggested an appreciable overall improvement, irrespective of type of pain, and this was reflected for most of the individual measures. There were no serious adverse events (Chrubasik et al 2008b). In a recent double-blind placebo-controlled trial of 89 patients with rheumatoid arthritis, treatment with encapsulated rose-hip powder 5 g daily for 6 months suggested that patients with rheumatoid arthritis may benefit from additional treatment with rose hip (Willich et al 2010). A study comparing powdered rose hip with and without the seeds found that extracts derived from rose hip without fruits were more effective in assays carried out for inhibition of COX-1, COX-2 and 5-LOX-mediated leukotriene B(4) formation, as well as for antioxidant capacity (Wenzig et al 2008). Extracts of rosehips have displayed potent antiinflammatory and antinociceptive activities in several in vivo experimental models (Deliorman Orhan et al 2007

Buy Membership for Basic Science Category to continue reading. Learn more here