The Cardiovascular System

Published on 02/03/2015 by admin

Filed under Internal Medicine

Last modified 22/04/2025

Print this page

rate 1 star rate 2 star rate 3 star rate 4 star rate 5 star
Your rating: none, Average: 5 (1 votes)

This article have been viewed 5691 times

Chapter 10 The Cardiovascular Exam

A. Generalities

Cardiovascular examination is centered on five main components, all essential for making a diagnosis. This section discusses inspection, palpation, and percussion. Auscultation is addressed in two separate presentations.

B. General (Physical) Appearance

2 What aspects of general appearance should be observed in evaluating cardiac patients?

As suggested by Perloff, one should sequentially evaluate the following nine areas:

See Tables 10-1 and 10-2.

Table 10-1 Diagnostic Clues: Body and Facies, Gestures and Gait, Face and Ears

Body Appearance and Facies
image The anasarca of congestive heart failure
image The struggling, anguished, frightened, orthopneic, and diaphoretic look of pulmonary edema
image The tall stature, long extremities (with arm span exceeding patient’s height), and sparse subcutaneous fat of Marfan’s syndrome (mitral valve prolapse, aortic dilation, and dissection)
image The long extremities, kyphoscoliosis, and pectus carinatum of homocystinuria (arterial thrombosis)
image The tall stature and long extremities of Klinefelter’s syndrome (atrial or ventricular septal defects, patent ductus arteriosus, and even tetralogy of Fallot)
image The tall stature and thick extremities of acromegaly (hypertension, cardiomyopathy, and conduction defects)
image The short stature, webbed neck, low hairline, small chin, wide-set nipples, and sexual infantilism of Turner’s syndrome (coarctation of the aorta and valvular pulmonic stenosis)
image The dwarfism and polydactyly of Ellis-van Creveld syndrome (atrial septal defects and common atrium)
image The morbid obesity and somnolence of obstructive sleep apnea (hypoventilation, pulmonary hypertension, and cor pulmonale)
image The truncal obesity, thin extremities, moon face, and buffalo hump of hypertensive patients with Cushing’s syndrome
image The mesomorphic, overweight, balding, hairy, and tense middle-aged patient with coronary artery disease
image The hammer toes and pes cavus of Friedreich’s ataxia (hypertrophic cardiomyopathy, angina, and sick sinus syndrome)
image The straight lower back of ankylosing spondylitis (aortic regurgitation and complete heart block)
Gestures, Gait, and Stance
image The Levine’s sign (clenched fist over the chest of patients with an acute myocardial infarction)
image The preferential squatting of tetralogy of Fallot
image The ataxic gait of tertiary syphilis (associated with aortic aneurysm and regurgitation)
image The waddling gait, lumbar lordosis, and calves pseudohypertrophy of Duchenne’s muscular dystrophy (associated with hypertrophic cardiomyopathy and a pseudo infarction pattern on ECG)
Face and Ears
image Pulsatility of the earlobes (tricuspid regurgitation)
image Head bobbing (De Musset’s and Lincoln’s signs)
image The round and chubby face of congenital pulmonary stenosis
image The hypertelorism, pigmented moles, webbed neck, and low-set ears of Turner’s syndrome
image The round and chubby face of congenital valvular pulmonic stenosis
image The elfin face (small chin, malformed teeth, wide-set eyes, patulous lips, baggy cheeks, blunt and upturned nose) of congenital stenosis of the pulmonary arteries and supravalvular aortic stenosis—often associated with hypercalcemia and mental retardation.
image The unilateral lower facial weakness of infants with cardiofacial syndrome—this can be encountered in 5–10% of infants with congenital heart disease (usually ventricular septal defect); often noticeable only during crying.
image The premature aging of Werner’s syndrome and progeria (associated with premature coronary artery and systemic atherosclerotic disease)
image The drooping eyelids, expressionless face, receding hairline, and bilateral cataracts of Steinert’s disease (myotonic dystrophy, associated with conduction disorders, mitral valve prolapse)
image The epicanthic fold, protruding tongue, small ears, short nose, and flat bridge of Down syndrome (endocardial cushion defects)
image The dry and brittle hair, loss of lateral eyebrows, puffy eyelids, apathetic face, protruding tongue, thick and sallow skin of myxedema (associated with pericardial and coronary artery disease)
image The macroglossia not only of Down syndrome and myxedema, but also of amyloidosis (linked to restrictive cardiomyopathy, congestive heart failure)
image The paroxysmal facial and neck flushing of carcinoid syndrome (with pulmonic stenosis and tricuspid stenosis/regurgitation)
image The saddle-shaped nose of polychondritis (associated with aortic aneurysm)
image The tightening of skin and mouth, scattered telangiectasias, and hyperpigmentation/hypopigmentation of scleroderma (with pulmonary hypertension, pericarditis, and myocarditis)
image The flushed cheeks and cyanotic lips of mitral stenosis (acrocyanosis)
image The gargoylism of Hurler’s syndrome (associated with mitral and/or aortic disease)
image The short palpebral fissures, small upper lip, and hypoplastic mandible of fetal alcohol syndrome (associated with atrial or ventricular septal defects)
image The diagonal earlobe crease as a (questionable) marker of coronary artery disease (earlobe sign [also known as Frank’s sign])

Table 10-2 Diagnostic Clues: Eyes, Extremities, Skin, Thorax, and Abdomen

Eyes
image Xanthelasmhas of dyslipidemia and coronary artery disease (CAD)
image The enlarged lacrimal glands of sarcoidosis (restrictive cardiomyopathy, conduction defects, and, possibly, cor pulmonale)
image The cataracts and deafness of “rubella syndrome” (patent ductus arteriosus [PDA] or stenosis of the pulmonary artery)
image The stare and proptosis of increased central venous pressureimage The lid lag, stare, and exophthalmos of hyperthyroidism (tachyarrhythmias, angina, and high output failure)
image The conjunctival petechiae of endocarditis
image The conjunctivitis of Reiter’s disease (pericarditis, aortic regurgitation, and prolongation of the P-R interval)
image The blue sclerae of osteogenesis imperfecta (aortic regurgitation)
image The icteric sclerae of cirrhosis
image The Brushfield’s spots (small white spots on the periphery of the iris, usually crescentic and with an outward concavity, frequently but not exclusively seen in Down syndrome—endocardial cushion defects)
image The fissuring of the iris (coloboma) of total anomalous pulmonary venous return
image The dislocated lens of Marfan’s syndrome
image The retinal changes of hypertension and diabetes (CAD and congestive heart failure)
image The Roth spots of bacterial endocarditis
Extremities
image The cyanosis and clubbing of “central mixing” (right-to-left shunts, pulmonary arteriovenous fistulas, and drainage of the inferior vena cava into left atrium)
image The differential cyanosis and clubbing of PDA with pulmonary hypertension (the reversed shunt limits cyanosis and clubbing to the feet, but spares hands)
image The “reversed” differential cyanosis and clubbing of transposition (aorta originating from the right ventricle): hands are cyanotic and clubbed, but feet are normal
image The sudden pallor, pain, and coldness of peripheral embolization
image Osler’s nodes (swollen, tender, raised, pea-sized lesion of finger pads, palms, and soles) and Janeway lesions (small, nontender, erythematous or hemorrhagic lesions of the palms or soles) of bacterial endocarditis
image The clubbing, splinter hemorrhages of endocarditis
image The Raynaud’s of scleroderma
image The simian line of Down’s syndrome (atrial septal defect [ASD])
image The hyperextensible joints of osteogenesis imperfecta (aortic regurgitation)
image The nicotine finger stains of chain smokers (CAD)
image The leg edema of congestive heart failure
image The tightly tapered and contracted fingers of scleroderma, with ischemic ulcers and hypoplastic nails (often associated with pulmonary hypertension and myocardial disease, pericarditis, and valvulopathy)
image The arachnodactyly, hyperextensible joints (especially knees, wrists, and fingers), and flat feet of Marfan’s syndrome (associated with aortic disease and regurgitation)
image The ulnar deviation of rheumatoid arthritis (pericardial, valvular, or myocardial disease)
image The mainline track lines of addicts (tricuspid regurgitation, septic emboli, and endocarditis)
image The liver palms (thenar and hypothenar erythema) of chronic hepatic congestion
Skin
image The jaundice or hepatic congestion
image The cyanosis of right-to-left shunt
image The pallor of anemia and high output failure
image The bronzing of hemochromatosis (restrictive cardiomyopathy)
image The telangiectasias of Rendu-Osler-Weber (at times associated with pulmonary arteriovenous fistulae)
image The neurofibromas, café-au-lait spots, and axillary freckles (Crowe’s sign) of von Recklinghausen’s (pheochromocytomas)
image The symmetric vitiligo (especially of the distal extremities) of hyperthyroidism
image The butterfly rash of SLE (endo-myo- pericarditis)
image The eyelid purplish discoloration of dermatomyositis (cardiomyopathy, heart block, and pericarditis)
image The skin nodules and macules of sarcoidosis (cardiomyopathy and blocks)
image The xanthomas of dyslipidemia
image The hyperextensible skin (and joints) of Ehlers-Danlos (mitral valve prolapse)
image The coarse and sallow skin of hypothyroidism
image The skin nodules (sebaceous adenomas), shagreen patches, and periungual fibromas of tuberous sclerosis (rhabdomyomas of the heart and arrhythmias)
Thorax and Abdomen
image The thoracic bulges of ventricular septal defect/ASD
image The pectus carinatum, pectus excavatum, and kyphoscoliosis of Marfan’s syndrome
image The akyphotic and straight back of mitral valve prolapse
image The systolic (and rarely diastolic) murmurs of pectus carinatum, excavatum, straight back
image The barrel chest of emphysema (cor pulmonale)
image The shield chest of Turner’s syndrome
image The cor pulmonale of severe kyphoscoliosis
image The ascites of right-sided or biventricular failure
image The hepatic pulsation of tricuspid regurgitation
image The positive abdominojugular reflux of congestive heart failure

C. The Arterial Pulse

Evaluation of the arterial pulse is a time-honored method of bedside examination. It can still provide valuable cardiovascular information. In selective processes (such as tamponade, aortic valve disease, and hypertrophic cardiomyopathy), it can even prove essential for securing a diagnosis. Yet, assessment of the characteristics of the arterial pulse requires skill and practice, and at times can be frustrating. It is worth the effort, though, and thus deserves attention, even in our times of intra-arterial monitoring.

33 What is the diagnostic significance of a pulsus bisferiens?

It usually reflects moderate to severe aortic regurgitation (with or without aortic stenosis), but can also occur in other high output states. In aortic regurgitation, however, the double pulse is not only palpable, but sometimes is even audible. For example, it can be detected as:

D. Central Venous Pressure and Jugular Venous Pulse (Waveform)

“The visible oscillations in this region consist of a series of filling and collapses, sometimes prominent and easy to recognize … There is found then, aside from the slow oscillations caused by the respiratory movements and simultaneous with them, the following sequence of movements which is repeated with constant and perfect regularity: at first a slow elevation, then two quick elevations, finally two deep depressions, after which the series begins again. Now each series of this kind corresponds to a cardiac cycle. These impulses sometimes have such force and amplitude that at first it might be believed that they represent pulsation of the carotid artery or of the subclavian. But after a little attention one is soon convinced that they actually take place in the internal jugular.”

–Pierre Carl Potain: On the movements and sounds that take place in the jugular veins. Bull Mem Soc Med Hop (Paris) 4:3, 1867.

“We come now to the study of a subject which gives us far more information of what is actually going on within the chambers of the heart. In the study of the venous pulse we have often the direct means of observing the effects of the systole and diastole of the right auricle, and of the systole and diastole of the right ventricle. The venous pulse represents therefore a greater variety of features, and is subject to influence so subtle that it may manifest variations due to the changing conditions of the patient, during which the arterial pulse reveals no appreciable alteration.”

–James MacKenzie: The Study of the Pulse, Arterial, Venous and Hepatic, and the Movements of the Heart. Edinburgh, Young J. Pentland, 1902.

“Clinical analysis of the venous pulse may not be easy, but there can be no question that five minutes spent observing the movements of neck veins may be as informative as auscultation.”

–Paul Wood: Diseases of the Heart and Circulation. London, Eyre & Spottiswoode, 1950.

Observation of the jugular venous pulse and measurement of the central venous pressure are more recent acquisitions than the evaluation of the arterial pulse, yet they can still provide a wealth of valuable clinical information, especially when trying to assess intravascular volume, evaluate right ventricular function, test the integrity of the pulmonic and tricuspid valves, and investigate the status of the pericardium. Skills are difficult—at times even intimidating. Yet, they are worth the effort, even in our times of invasive hemodynamic monitoring.

75 What is the anatomy of internal and external jugular veins?

The external jugulars lie above the sternocleidomastoid muscles, coursing obliquely from behind and laterally toward the angle of the jaw (Fig. 10-6). The internal jugulars lie instead below the sternocleidomastoids, crossing them in a vertical straight line. At the junction with the subclavian veins, the internal jugulars create a dilation known as the bulb, which is often visible between the two heads of the sternocleidomastoid muscles.

77 How important is the patient’s position during examination of the neck veins?

Of enormous importance:

78 How do you tell apart the carotid pulse from the jugular venous pulse?

By the following differentiating features:

image The waveform is different: The venous pulsation is diffuse, at least bifid, and with a slow upward deflection. Conversely, the carotid pulse is well localized, single, and with a fast outward deflection. Also, the most striking event in the venous pulse is the troughs, whereas in the arterial pulse, it is the ascent.

image The response to position is different: The carotid pulse never varies with position. The venous pulsations classically do so. In fact, as the patient sits up or stands, they move down toward the clavicle and may even disappear below it. Conversely, as the patient reclines, venous pulsations gradually climb toward the angle of the jaw. They may even disappear behind the auricle.

image The response to respiration is different: In the absence of intrathoracic disease (and Kussmaul’s sign—see questions 115118), the top of the venous waveform descends toward the heart during inspiration (because of lower intrathoracic pressure and greater venous return). The carotid pulse, instead, remains unchanged. The only exception is pulsus paradoxus, and even in this case, the variation is rarely visible, at most palpable. Note that inspiration makes jugular “pulsations” more visible (by enhancing venous return), even though it also lowers the mean jugular “pressure.”

image The response to palpation is different: The jugular venous pulse is too light to be palpable. Even gentle pressure will collapse the vein, engorge its more distal segment, and obliterate the pulse. Conversely, the carotid is not only palpable but quite forceful too.

image The response to abdominal pressure is different: Sustained pressure on the abdomen (the abdominojugular reflux test, see questions 106114) will not change the carotid pulse, but will increase (at least momentarily) even the normal venous pulse (see Table 10-3).

Table 10-3 Differentiation Between Jugular and Carotid Pulses

Characteristic Internal Jugular Vein and Jugular Venous Pulse Carotid Artery and Carotid Pulse
Location Low in neck and lateral Deep in neck and medial
Contour Double peaked and diffuse Single peaked and sharp
Character Undulant, not palpable Forceful, brisk, easily felt
Response to position Varies with position No variation
Response to respiration Mean pressure decreases on inspiration (height of column falls), but A and V waves become more visible No variation
Response to abdominal pressure Displaces pulse upward and induces transient increase in mean pressure Pulse unchanged
Effect of palpation Wave visible but nonpalpable Pulse unchanged
  Gentle pressure 3–4   cm above the clavicle obliterates pulse and fills the vein Vessel difficult to compress

(Adapted from Cook DJ, Simel N: Does this patient have abnormal central venous pressure? JAMA 275:630–634, 1996; and Abrams J: Essentials of Cardiac Physical Diagnosis. Philadelphia, Lea & Febiger, 1987.)

82 What is the physiology of the various ascents and descents of the jugular venous pulse?

It is the physiology of right-sided chambers. Thus, assessing the jugular venous pulse is important, not only to visualize peaks and troughs, but also to relate these undulations to various physiologic and clinical events, such as the ECG, the carotid pulse, and the heart sounds. More specifically:

image The A wave (the first and dominant positive wave) is produced by right atrial contraction. It follows the P wave on ECG, coincides with the fourth heart sound (if present), and slightly precedes both the first heart sound and carotid upstroke.

image The C wave, the second positive wave (only visible on recordings), is produced by the bulging of the tricuspid cusps into the right atrium and thus coincides with ventricular isovolumetric contraction. Note that a very small component of “C” is produced by the transmitted carotid pulsation—in fact, MacKenzie considered it an entirely carotid artifact; hence, the label “C”). Also, note that the interval between A and C corresponds to the P–R interval on ECG (this was one of the methods used by Wenckebach to describe the second-degree heart block that still carries his name). Yet, since the C wave is not visible at the bedside, it will be omitted from the remainder of our discussion.

image The early X descent (located between A and C) is produced by right atrial relaxation. The most dominant later trough (X1 [i.e., the “x-prime”]) is produced instead by the pulling of the valvular cusps into the right ventricle. This downward and forward movement of valve and atrium floor (descent of the base) coincides with right ventricular isotonic contraction and acts as a plunger, creating a sucking effect that draws blood from the great veins into the right atrium. The X1 descent occurs during systole, coincides with ventricular ejection and the carotid pulse, takes place between S1 and S2, and ends just before S2. Note that this discussion disregards the early X descent and uses instead this term to refer to the combined X and X1 troughs—the only one visible at the bedside.

image The V wave (the third positive wave) occurs toward the end of ventricular systole and during the early phase of ventricular diastole. It coincides with the apex of the carotid pulse and peaks immediately after S2. Because the ventricle relaxes while the tricuspid valve is still closed, blood flowing into the right atrium starts building up, generating a positive wave.

image The Y descent (the final negative trough) occurs during early ventricular diastole. It is due to the opening of the tricuspid valve and the emptying of the right atrium. It corresponds to S3.

Clinically, the only visible peaks are A and V; the only visible troughs are a combination of X1 and X (which we will herein refer to as “X”) and Y; the A wave is usually more prominent than the V wave, whereas the X descent is usually more prominent than the Y descent. Overall, it is easier to time the pulse by using the X and Y descents than the A and V waves.

83 Who was Wenckebach?

Karel F. Wenckebach (1864–1940) was a Dutch physician. Building on an 1873 observation by the Italian physiologist Luigi Luciani, he reported in 1899 the phenomenon that still carries his name. He described it in a 40-year-old woman who had presented with an irregular pulse. Wenckebach based his conclusions on tracings of the patient’s arterial pulse, observations of her venous pulse, and intra-atrial and intraventricular recordings in a frog. His insight preceded the invention of electrocardiography by 2 years, the discovery of the atrioventricular node by 7 years, and the description of the sinoatrial node by 8 years. Still, despite his genius he remained a simple and unassuming man who was full of charm, had a self-deprecating humor, and a life-long love for the arts and the English countryside. He was famous for quipping that he was not a great man, just a “happy man.” His colleagues loved him and many affectionately referred to him as “Venky.” His many friends included Sir William Osler and James MacKenzie (with whom he maintained a long correspondence, praising him for his 1902 book The Study of the Pulse). A master of physical diagnosis and a pioneer in arrhythmias, Wenckebach linked his name not only to the homonymous phenomenon, but also to one of the first reports on the beneficial use of quinine in atrial fibrillation. He taught at Utrecht, Groningen, Strasbourg, and, finally, Vienna, where he died of urosepsis just after the onset of World War II.

87 What are the most important abnormalities of jugular waves?

For both this and the next question, see Fig. 10-9.

image Giant A wave. In addition to tricuspid stenosis, this also can occur in increased right ventricular end-diastolic pressure (from pulmonic stenosis, primary pulmonary hypertension, pulmonary emboli, or chronic pulmonary disease). In these patients, the large A wave reflects a strong atrial contraction against a stiffer ventricle presenting with a concomitantly blunted and small Y descent. The acoustic counterpart of a giant A wave is a right-sided S4, and its electric equivalent is a P pulmonale. Giant A waves also may be seen in marked left ventricular hypertrophy (like AS, severe hypertension, or hypertrophic obstructive cardiomyopathy). In these patients, the ventricular septum bulges toward the right, making right ventricular filling more difficult (the Bernheim effect, from Hippolyte Bernheim, the French physician and hypnotist who described it in 1910).

image “Cannon” A wave is the hallmark of atrioventricular dissociation (i.e., the atrium contracts against a closed tricuspid valve). It is different from the other prominent outward wave (i.e., the presystolic giant A wave), insofar as it begins just after S1, since it represents atrial contraction against a closed tricuspid valve. The giant A wave, on the other hand, begins just before S1—like the large V wave of tricuspid regurgitation (see below). Intermittent cannon A waves reflect atrioventricular dissociation in a setting of ventricular tachycardia, whereas regular cannon A waves reflect atrioventricular dissociation in a setting of supraventricular tachycardia with retrograde atrial activation.

image The V wave is classically increased in tricuspid regurgitation (TR), during which it becomes the dominant wave, associated with a brisk Y collapse (a more gentle Y descent usually indicates concomitant regurgitation and stenosis). Abdominal compression may help to unmask more subtle and subclinical cases. Prominent V waves can become so large that they were dubbed by Paul Wood “the venous Corrigan.” In fact, they may even cause bobbing of the earlobes (the Lancisi’s sign). Since the C and V merger responsible for the giant V wave entirely eliminates the X descent, a giant wave is easy to spot: it starts just after S1 and leaves the patient with only one ascent (the V wave) and one descent (the Y descent). The giant V wave is not too sensitive for tricuspid regurgitation (TR), being present in only 40% of the cases.

image Equally prominent A and V waves can occur in atrial septal defect, wherein the V wave in the higher-pressure left atrium is transmitted through the perforated septum into the right atrium, and from there to the jugular veins. Still, equally prominent A and V waves are much more commonly suggestive of simple right ventricular failure.

image

Figure 10-9 Normal and abnormal venous pulses.

(From Adair OV, Havranek EP [eds]: Cardiology Secrets. Philadelphia, Hanley & Belfus, 1995.)

88 What are the most important abnormalities of jugular descents?

89 How do you estimate the CVP?

This method relies on the fact that the zero point of the entire right-sided manometer (i.e., the point where central venous pressure is, by convention, zero) is the center of the right atrium. This is vertically situated at 5   cm below the sternal angle, a relationship that is present in subjects of normal size and shape, regardless of their body position. Thus, using the sternal angle as the external reference point, the vertical distance (in centimeters) to the top of the column of blood in the jugular vein will provide the JVP. Adding 5 to the JVP will yield the CVP.

94 How precise is the clinical assessment of CVP?

When well performed (and in stable patients), it can be quite accurate, with bedside estimates of CVP within 4   cm H2O of intravenous catheter measurement in almost 90% of the cases. Still, interobserver (and intraobserver) variability may be as high as 7   cm. This becomes especially problematic in the unstable patient, where expertise plays an important role. For instance:

image In a study of 50 intensive care unit patients, agreement on CVP values was substantial between students and residents, moderate between students and attending physicians, and modest between residents and staff. Factors that interfered with the precision of the estimate included variations in patients’ positioning, poor ambient lighting, confusion between carotid and venous pulsations, and changes in CVP with respiration.

image In a second study, an attending physician, a critical care fellow, a medical resident, an intern, and a student were asked to predict whether the CVP of 62 patients was low, normal, high, or very high. Right heart catheterization provided the gold standard. The sensitivity of clinical examination was 0.33, 0.33, and 0.49, respectively for the identification of low (<0   mmHg), normal (0 to 7   mmHg), or high (>7   mmHg) CVP. The specificity of the exam was instead 0.73, 0.62, and 0.76, respectively. Accuracy was greater in patients with low cardiac indexes (<2.2 L/min) and high pulmonary artery wedge pressures (>18   mmHg). It was lower in comatose patients or patients on mechanical ventilation. A higher precision (i.e., interobserver agreement) did not translate into a greater accuracy.

image In a third study, Eisenberg and colleagues compared bedside assessment of 97 critically ill patients with pulmonary artery catheter readings. They compared various hemodynamic variables, including CVP. Based on clinical assessment, physicians were asked to predict whether the CVP was <2, 2–6, or >6   mmHg. Predictions were correct only 55% of the time. CVP was underestimated more frequently than overestimated (27% and 17% respectively).

95 So what conclusions can be drawn about the clinical use of CVP assessment?

When compared to the gold standard of a central venous catheter, clinical measurement of CVP is overall poor, especially in the acutely ill patient. In the aforementioned study of 50 critically ill patients, for example, the pooled accuracy of the test was 56%. All groups involved (students, residents, and attending physicians) tended to underestimate central venous pressure (see question 96), and level of expertise was not a guarantee of accuracy. In fact, the correlation coefficient between clinical assessment and central venous catheter recording was highest for medical students (0.74), a little lower for residents (0.71), and lowest for staff physicians (0.65). These correlations slightly improved after exclusion of patients on mechanical ventilation, suggesting that CVP assessment is more accurate in patients who breathe spontaneously. Hence, bedside assessment of CVP is only accurate at the extremes of presentation:

111 How do you perform an abdominojugular test?

By observing the jugular venous pressure before, during, and after abdominal compression:

image Position the supine patient so that the jugular venous pulsations are properly monitored (an angle of 45 degrees will usually suffice). Then instruct the patient to relax and breathe normally through the open mouth. This will avoid the false positive increase in jugular venous pressure caused by a Valsalva’s maneuver inadvertently triggered by abdominal discomfort.

image Apply your hand over the patient’s mid abdomen (periumbilical area), with fingers widely spread and palm gently rested. Once the patient is well relaxed, apply gradual and progressive pressure for at least 15 seconds: firm, inward, cephalad, and soon reaching a steady level of 20–35   mmHg. This can be confirmed by placing an unrolled bladder of a standard adult blood pressure cuff between the examiner’s hand and the patient’s abdomen. The cuff should be partially inflated with six full-bulb compressions.

image Note that the precision of the test may vary, based on the force of abdominal compression. Different investigators have in fact suggested different force: Ducas recommended 35   mmHg (equivalent to a weight of approximately 8   kg), whereas Ewy used 20   mmHg.

image Throughout the maneuver (i.e., before, during, or after compression), observe the column of blood in the internal and external jugular veins.

image To avoid the risk of false positive neck vein distention from breath-holding or “bearing down,” consider a trial run. This also can be used to demonstrate in advance the force that will be applied onto the abdomen.

image You might also look for a softening of the first heart sound during the application of abdominal pressure. This represents the auscultatory equivalent of a positive response.

113 What is the significance of a positive abdominojugular reflux?

In patients presenting with dyspnea and/or angina, it argues in favor of bi-ventricular failure and suggests a pulmonary capillary wedge pressure >15   mmHg. This was confirmed at cardiac catheterization by Ewy et al. Patients with positive response also had lower left ventricular ejection fraction and stroke volume and higher mean pulmonary arterial and right atrial pressure, confirming biventricular failure. Conversely, a negative test in a patient with dyspnea would strongly argue against the presence of increased left atrial pressure.

In the absence of left ventricular failure, a positive test points instead to the right chambers, suggesting an inability of the atrium and ventricle to handle an increased venous return. This is particularly useful in subclinical cases, where a positive test has high sensitivity and specificity for predicting right atrial pressure >9   mmHg and right ventricular end-diastolic pressure >12   mmHg. Differential diagnosis includes impaired right ventricular preload (increased intravascular volume), decreased right ventricular compliance (right ventricular hypertrophy), decreased right ventricular systolic function (right ventricular infarction), or elevated right ventricular afterload (pulmonary hypertension).

Tricuspid regurgitation, tricuspid stenosis, restrictive cardiomyopathy, and constrictive pericarditis are also a common cause of a positive test. The only condition not presenting with a positive abdominojugular reflux is cardiac tamponade. Hence, the test is not specific to any one disorder, but is instead a reflection of either a right ventricle that cannot accommodate an increased return or a left ventricle that is dysfunctional.

120 What is the “venous hum”?

It is a functional murmur (see Chapter 12, questions 44 and 45) produced by turbulent flow in the internal jugular vein. It is continuous (albeit louder in diastole) and at times strong enough to be associated with a palpable thrill. It is best heard on the right side of the neck, just above the clavicle, but sometimes it can become audible over the sternal/parasternal areas, both right and left. This may lead to misdiagnoses of carotid disease, patent ductus arteriosus, or AR/AS.

E. The Precordial Movement and Impulse

Inspection and palpation of precordial impulse and movements complete the preauscultatory evaluation of the cardiovascular system. In fact, percussion of the cardiac area (although still quite accurate when competently performed) has become more a memory of the past than a standard of today’s practice. Conversely, evaluation of the precordial impulse remains a very important part of the exam. It can provide valuable information on intracardiac size and function and may even be the first clue of ventricular enlargement, well before any ECG or x-ray change.

131 Which characteristics of the apical impulse should be analyzed?

image Location: Normally over the fifth left interspace midclavicular line, which usually (but not always) corresponds to the area just below the nipple. Volume loads to the left ventricle (such as aortic or mitral regurgitation) tend to displace the apical impulse downward and laterally. Conversely, pressure loads (such as aortic stenosis or hypertension) tend to displace the impulse more upward and medially—at least initially. Still, a failing and decompensated ventricle, independent of its etiology, will typically present with a downward and lateral shift in PMI. Although not too sensitive, this finding is very specific for cardiomegaly, low ejection fraction, and high pulmonary capillary wedge pressure. Correlation of the PMI with anatomic landmarks (such as the left anterior axillary line) can be used to better characterize the displaced impulse.

image Size: As measured in left lateral decubitus, the normal apical impulse is the size of a dime. Anything larger (nickel, quarter, or an old Eisenhower silver dollar) should be considered pathologic. A diameter >4   cm is quite specific for cardiomegaly.

image Duration and timing: This is probably one of the most important characteristics. A normal apical duration is brief and never passes midsystole. Thus, a sustained impulse (i.e., one that continues into S2 and beyond—often referred to as a “heave”) should be considered pathologic until proven otherwise, and is usually indicative of pressure load, volume load, or cardiomyopathy. For separating these conditions, use the overall clinical picture:

image Amplitude: This is not the length of the impulse, but its force. A hyperdynamic impulse (often referred to as a “thrust”) that is forceful enough to lift the examiner’s finger can be encountered in situations of volume overload and increased output (such as aortic regurgitation and ventricular septal defect), but may also be felt in normal subjects with very thin chests. Similarly, a hypodynamic impulse can be due to simple obesity, but also to congestive cardiomyopathy. In addition to being hypodynamic, the precordial impulse of these patients is large, somewhat sustained, and displaced downward/laterally.

image Contour: A normal apical impulse is single. Double or triple impulses are clearly pathologic.

Hence, a normal apical impulse consists of a single, dime-sized, brief (barely beyond S1), early systolic, and nonsustained impulse, localized over the fifth interspace midclavicular line.

132 What are the most common abnormal apical movements?

image A double systolic apical impulse can be seen in patients with hypertrophic obstructive cardiomyopathy (HOCM). This may even present as a triple apical impulse (triple ripple), with one impulse being presystolic (and corresponding to a strong atrial contraction) and the other two being instead systolic (corresponding to the initial ventricular contraction, and a delayed one necessary to overcome the outflow obstruction by the septum). A thrill is often present. Note that a double systolic impulse also may be encountered in patients with left ventricular dyskinesia due to either ischemia or aneurysm of the wall (see question 138). In fact, one third of patients with ventricular aneurysm present with abnormal precordial findings.

image A presystolic apical impulse represents the palpable equivalent of a fourth heart sound. It is an important finding because it provides a clue to reduced left ventricular compliance, as in the case of either ischemia or pressure load (such as aortic stenosis or hypertension). In aortic stenosis, a palpable S4 usually correlates with a significant gradient between the left ventricle and aorta. It is often associated with a palpable thrill over the second right interspace.

image An early diastolic apical impulse represents the palpable equivalent of S3. It is more difficult to palpate than the presystolic impulse and usually indicates a dilated left ventricle. This can be the result of either volume load (i.e., mitral regurgitation) and/or left ventricular failure. In the latter, there may be an associated sustained apical impulse.

140 What is a thrill?

A palpable vibration associated with an audible murmur (see Chapter 12, question 7). A thrill automatically qualifies the murmur as being >4/6 in intensity and thus pathologic.

Selected Bibliography

1 Amoroso T, Greenwood RN. Posture and central venous pressure measurement in circulatory volume depletion. Lancet. 1989;2:258-260.

2 Basta LL, Bettinger JJ. The cardiac impulse. Am Heart J. 1979;197:96-111.

3 Benchimol A, Tippit HC. The clinical value of the jugular and hepatic pulses. Prog Cardiovasc Dis. 1967;10:159-186.

4 Boicourt OW, Nagle RE, Mounsey JPD. The clinical significance of systolic retraction of the apical impulse. Br Heart J. 1965;127:379-391.

5 Borst JGG, Molhuysen A. Exact determination of the central venous pressure by a simple clinical method. Lancet. 1952;2:304-309.

20 Bude RO, Rubin JM, Platt JF, et al. Pulsus tardus: Its cause and potential limitations in detection of arterial stenosis. Radiology. 1994;190:779-784.

6 Butman SM, Ewy GA, Standen JR, et al. Bedside cardiovascular examination in patients with severe chronic heart failure: Importance of rest or inducible jugular venous distension. J Am Coll Cardiol. 1993;22:968-974.

7 Cintron GB, Hernandez E, Linares E, et al. Bedside recognition of right ventricular infarction. Am J Cardiol. 1981;47:224-227.

8 Constant J. Using internal jugular pulsations as a manometer for right atrial pressure measurements. Cardiology. 2000;93:26-30.

9 Cook DJ, Simel N. Does this patient have abnormal central venous pressure? JAMA. 1996;275:630-634.

10 Davison R, Cannon R. Estimation of central venous pressure by examination of the jugular veins. Am Heart J. 1974;87:279-282.

11 Dell’Italia J, Starling MR, O’Rourke RA. Physical examination for exclusion of hemodynamically important right ventricular infarction. Ann Intern Med. 1983;99:608-611.

120 Drazner MH, Rame JE, Stevenson LW, et al: Prognostic importance of elevated jugular venous pressure and a third heart sound in patients with heart failure. N Engl J Med 345:574–581, 200.

13 Ducas J, Magder S, McGregor M. Validity of the hepatojugular reflux as a clinical test for congestive heart failure. Am J Cardiol. 1983;52:1299-1303.

14 Eddleman EE, Langley JO. Paradoxical pulsation of the precordium in myocardial infarction and angina pectoris. Am Heart J. 1962;63:579-581.

15 Ellen SD, Crawford MH, O’Rourke RA. Accuracy of precordial palpation for detecting increased left ventricular volume. Ann Intern Med. 1983;99:628-630.

16 Ewy GA. The abdominojugular test. Ann Intern Med. 1988;109:456-460.

17 Forssell G, Jonasson R, Orinius E. Identifying severe aortic valvular stenosis by bedside examination. Acta Med Scand. 1985;218:397-400.

18 Ikram H, Nixon PGF, Fox JA, et al. The hemodynamic implications of bisferiens pulse. Br Heart J. 1964;26:452-459.

19 Lange RL, Boticelli JT, Tsagaris TJ, et al. Diagnostic signs in compressive cardiac disorders: Constrictive pericarditis, pericardial effusion, and tamponade. Circulation. 1966;33:763-777.

21 Lorell B, Leinbach RC, Pohost GM, et al. Right ventricular infarction: Clinical diagnosis and differentiation from cardiac tamponade and pericardial constriction. Am J Cardiol. 1979;43:465-471.

22 McGee SR. Physical examination of venous pressure: A critical review. Am Heart J. 1998;136:10-18.

23 O’Neill TW, Barry M, Smith M, et al. Diagnostic value of the apex beat. Lancet. 1989;1:410-411.

24 Sauve JS, Laupacis A, Ostbye T, et al. The rational clinical examination. Does this patient have a clinically important carotid bruit? JAMA. 1993;270:2843-2845.

25 Smith D, Craige E. Mechanisms of the dicrotic pulse. Br Heart J. 1986;156:531-534.

26 Sochowski RA, Dubbin JD, Naqvi SZ. Clinical and hemodynamic assessment of the hepatojugular reflux. Am J Cardiol. 1990;66:1002-1006.

27 Surawicz B, Fisch C. Cardiac alternans: Diverse mechanisms and clinical manifestations. J Am Coll Cardiol. 1992;20:483-499.

28 Wiese J. The abdominojugular reflux sign. Am J Med. 2000;109:59-61.