T Cell Receptors and MHC Molecules

Published on 18/02/2015 by admin

Filed under Allergy and Immunology

Last modified 22/04/2025

Print this page

rate 1 star rate 2 star rate 3 star rate 4 star rate 5 star
Your rating: none, Average: 4.5 (2 votes)

This article have been viewed 3661 times

Chapter 5 T Cell Receptors and MHC Molecules

Summary

The T cell antigen receptor (TCR) is located on the surface of T cells and plays a critical role in the adaptive immune system. Its major function is to recognize antigen and transmit a signal to the interior of the T cell, which generally results in activation of T cell responses.

TCRs are similar in many ways to immunoglobulin molecules. Both are made up of pairs of subunits (α and β or γ and δ), which are themselves members of the immunoglobulin superfamily, and both recognize a wide variety of antigens via N terminal variable regions. These antigen recognition subunits are associated with the invariant chains of the T cell receptor, the CD3 complex, which perform critical signaling functions.

The two types of TCR may have distinct functions. In humans and mice, the αβ TCR predominates in most peripheral lymphoid tissues, whereas cells bearing the γδ TCR are enriched at mucosal surfaces.

Like immunoglobulins, TCRs are encoded by several sets of genes, and a large repertoire of TCR antigen-binding sites is generated by V(D)J recombination during T cell differentiation. Unlike immunoglobulins, TCRs are never secreted and do not undergo class switching or somatic hypermutation.

Antigen recognition by the αβ TCR requires the antigen to be bound to a specialized antigen-presenting structure known as a major histocompatibility complex (MHC) molecule. Unlike immunoglobulins, TCRs recognize antigen only in the context of a cell–cell interaction.

Class I and class II MHC molecules bind to peptides derived from different sources. Class I MHC molecules bind to peptides derived from cytosolic (intracellular) proteins, known as endogenous antigens. Class II MHC molecules bind to peptides derived from extracellular proteins that have been brought into the cell by phagocytosis or endocytosis (exogenous antigens).

Class I and class II MHC present peptide antigens to the TCR in a cell–cell interaction between an antigen-presenting cell (APC) and a T cell.

In humans the gene loci HLA-A, HLA-B, and HLA-C gene loci encode class I MHC molecules.

HLA-DP, HLA-DQ, and HLA-DR gene loci encode class II MHC molecules.

An individual’s MHC haplotype affects susceptibility to disease.

CD1 is an MHC class I-like molecule that presents lipid antigens.

T cell receptors

As discussed in Chapter 1, the immune system of higher vertebrates can be divided into two components – humoral immunity and cell-mediated immunity.

Humoral immunity, of which antibodies are a key component, provides protection via the extracellular fluids. Antibodies deal quite effectively with extracellular pathogens:

If antibodies were our only defense, however, pathogens could escape immune surveillance simply by hiding within cells. In fact, many pathogens – all viruses, some bacteria, and certain parasites – do just that, carrying out substantial portions of their life cycles within host cells. Remarkably, some bacteria even thrive within macrophages after being phagocytosed. These considerations highlight the need for a second arm of the immune response – cell-mediated immunity – of which T cells are critical operatives.

T cells recognize antigen via specialized cell surface antigen receptors – T cell receptors (TCRs) – which are structurally and evolutionarily related to antibodies.

TCRs recognize antigen via variable regions generated through V(D)J recombination (see Chapter 3), much like immunoglobulins, but are much more restricted in their antigen recognition capabilities.

The αβ heterodimer is the antigen recognition unit of the αβ TCR

The αβ TCR is the predominant receptor found in the thymus and peripheral lymphoid organs of mice and humans. It is a disulfide-linked heterodimer of α (40–50 kDa) and β (35–47 kDa) subunits and its structural features have been determined by X-ray crystallography (Fig. 5.2).

Each polypeptide chain of the αβ TCR contains two extracellular immunoglobulin-like domains of approximately 110 amino acids, anchored into the plasma membrane by a transmembrane domain that has a very short cytoplasmic tail.

The extracellular portions of the α and β chains fold into a structure that resembles the antigen-binding portion (Fab) of an antibody (see Fig. 3.9). Indeed, as in antibodies, the amino acid sequence variability of the TCR resides in the N terminal domains of the α and β (and also the γ and δ) chains.

The regions of greatest variability correspond to immunoglobulin hypervariable regions and are also known as complementarity determining regions (CDRs). They are clustered together to form an antigen-binding site analogous to the corresponding site on antibodies (see Fig. 5.2). Note, however, that:

The disulfide bond that links the α and β chains is in a peptide sequence located between the constant domain of the extracellular portion of the receptor and the transmembrane domain (shown as the C terminal residue in the α and β chain in Fig. 5.2).

One remarkable feature of the transmembrane portion of the receptor is the presence of positively charged residues in both the α and β chains. Unpaired charges would be unfavorable in a transmembrane segment. Indeed, these positive charges are neutralized by assembly of the complete TCR complex, which contains additional polypeptides bearing complementary negative charges (see below).

The CD3 complex associates with the antigen-binding αβ or γδ heterodimers to form the complete TCR

The αβ or γδ heterodimers must associate with a series of polypeptide chains collectively termed the CD3 complex for the antigen-binding domains of the TCR to form a complete, functional receptor that is stably expressed at the cell surface and is capable of transmitting a signal upon binding to antigen.

The four members of the CD3 complex (γ, δ, ε, and ζ) are sometimes termed the invariant chains of the TCR because they do not show variability in their amino acid sequences. (The γ and δ chains of the CD3 complex should not be confused with the quite distinct antigen-binding variable chains of the TCR that bear the same names.)

The CD3 chains are assembled as heterodimers of γε and δε subunits with a homodimer of ζ chains, giving an overall TCR stoichiometry of (αβ)2, γ, δ, ε2, ζ2. Current data suggest that the TCR complex exists as a dimer (Fig. 5.3).

The CD3 γ, δ, and ε chains are the products of three closely linked genes, and similarities in their amino acid sequences suggest that they are evolutionarily related.

Indeed, all three are members of the immunoglobulin superfamily, each containing an external domain followed by a transmembrane region and a substantial, highly conserved, cytopasmic tail of 40 or more amino acids.

As with the transmembrane domains of the variable chains of the TCR, the membrane-spanning regions of these CD3 chains contain charged amino acids.

The negatively charged residues in the transmembrane region of the CD3 chains interact with (and neutralize) the positively charged amino acids in the αβ polypeptides, leading to the formation of a stable TCR complex (see Fig. 5.3).

The CD3ζ gene is on a different chromosome from the CD3γδε gene complex, and the ζ protein is structurally unrelated to the other CD3 components. The ζ chains possess:

An alternatively spliced form of CD3ζ, called CD3η, possesses an even larger cytoplasmic tail (42 amino acids longer at the C terminus).

The cytoplasmic portions of ζ and η chains contain ITAMs

The ζ and η chains may associate in all three possible combinations (ζζ, ζη, or ηη) and play a critical role in signal transduction through the TCR. The cytoplasmic portions of these subunits contain particular amino acid sequences called immunoreceptor tyrosine-based activation motifs (ITAMs), and each chain contains three of these motifs.

The conserved tyrosine residues in the ITAM motifs are targets for phosphorylation by specific protein kinases. When the TCR is bound to its cognate antigen–MHC complex, the ITAM motifs become phosphorylated within minutes in one of the first steps in T cell activation (see Fig. 8.w1image).

ITAMs:

CD3ζ also functions in another signaling pathway, associating with the low-affinity FcγRIIIa receptor (CD16), which is involved in the activation of macrophages and natural killer (NK) cells (see Fig. 3.17).

Other subunits of the CD3 complex (γ, δ, ε), though lacking in ITAMs, may also become phosphorylated following TCR engagement. Phosphorylation of the CD3γ chain downregulates TCR expression on the cell surface via a mechanism involving increased receptor internalization.

The γδ TCR structurally resembles the αβ TCR but may function differently

The overall structure of the γδ TCR is similar to that of its αβ counterpart. Each chain is organized into:

One indication that the two types of T cell (i.e. T cells with αβ TCRs and T cells with γδ TCRs) might perform different functions comes from their anatomic distribution:

It is further believed that there are distinct subsets of γδ T cells that can perform different functions.

Antigen recognition by γδ T cells is unlike that of their αβ counterparts

The fact that γδ T cells are rare in anatomic locations known to support the classical mechanisms of antigen presentation and lymphocyte clonal expansion suggests the possibility that γδ cells might not need to rely upon normal antigen presentation mechanisms for their activation.

Several lines of evidence support the hypothesis that γδ T cells can recognize antigen in an MHC-independent fashion, for example:

γδ T cells therefore appear to be able to follow a different paradigm for T cell recognition of antigen than that employed by αβ T cells.

γδ T cells recognize at least two classes of ligand:

For example, human intraepithelial γδ T cells have been found to respond to MHC class I-related antigens (MICA and MICB) expressed on the surface of stressed cells.

In addition, some human γδ T cells recognize small organic compounds secreted by mycobacteria, such as monoethylphosphate and isopentenyl pyrophosphate. These ligands are secreted by a number of bacteria and may also be produced by some eukaryotic pathogens.

The γδ T cell arm of the adaptive immune system therefore appears to share some key characteristics of innate immune responses.

TCR variable region gene diversity is generated by V(D)J recombination

As with antibody genes, a highly diverse repertoire of TCR variable region genes is generated during T cell differentiation by a process of somatic gene rearrangement termed V(D)J recombination (see Chapter 3). Variable (V), joining (J), and sometimes diversity (D) gene segments are joined together to form a completed variable region gene.

Junctional diversity (imprecise joining of V, D, and J with loss and/or addition of nucleotides) contributes an enormous amount of variability to the TCR repertoire in addition to the variation that results from combinatorial assortment of the various gene segments.

TCRs are encoded by several sets of genes

The general arrangement of the genes encoding the α, β, γ, and δ chains of the TCR is remarkably similar to that of the immunoglobulin heavy chain genes (see Figs 3.21–3.23), suggesting a common origin from a primordial rearranging antigen receptor locus.

Figure 5.w1 illustrates the murine TCR genes, which are similar to those of humans. All four TCR gene families have been strongly conserved across more than 400 million years of evolution of the jawed vertebrates, which suggests a strong selective pressure for the preservation of both αβ and γδ T cell functions.

The nomenclature of the TCR genes is simple – the TCRA locus encodes the α gene, TCRB the β gene, and so on. Interestingly, the TCRD locus is nested within the TCRA cluster.

The α and γ loci have sets of V and J gene segments (analogous to immunoglobulin light chain loci), whereas the β and δ loci have V, D, and J gene segments (analogous to immunoglobulin heavy chains).

MHC molecules

Recognition by the αβ TCR requires antigen to be bound to an MHC molecule

As discussed in Chapter 3, antibodies recognize intact proteins, binding either to linear epitopes derived from contiguous amino acids or discontinuous epitopes produced by amino acids that are not near one another in the primary structure but are brought together in the three dimensional structure of the protein. In contrast, T cell receptors only recognize linear epitopes present in the form of short peptides which are generated by degradation of intact proteins within the cell (a process termed antigen processing). This property of T cell receptors is critical to the way the immune system recognizes intracellular pathogens and tumor antigens. Such antigens present a special challenge to the immune system: intracellular antigens are hidden within the cell, and are not available for recognition by antibodies. How can intracellular antigens be recognized by extracellular receptors? The immune system has solved this problem by evolving an elegant means of displaying internal antigens (including those of intracellular pathogens) on the cell surface, allowing their recognition by T cells:

This antigen processing and presentation pathway, upon which both activation and regulation of the immune response rests, is a complex and fascinating subject (see Chapter 8).

In humans the MHC is known as the HLA

The proteins responsible for presenting antigens to T cells, MHC class I and class II proteins, were originally discovered as histocompatibility (transplantation) antigens. Histocompatibility refers to the ability to accept tissue grafts from an unrelated donor.

The major histocompatibility complex locus (MHC) comprises over 100 separate genes and was discovered when it was recognized that both donor and recipient had to possess the same MHC haplotype to avoid graft rejection.

The principal moieties that determine rejection were identified as MHC class I and class II molecules (see below), but we know now that the main purpose of the MHC is not to prevent graft rejection. The remaining genes in the MHC (sometimes called class III) are very diverse. Some encode:

There are no functional or structural similarities between these other gene products.

All mammalian species possess the MHC, though details of the complex vary from one species to the next. In humans the locus is known as the HLA (an abbreviation for human leukocyte antigen); in mice it is known as the H-2 locus (Fig. 5.4).

MHC class I molecules consist of an MHC-encoded heavy chain bound to β2-microglobulin

The overall structure of the extracellular portion of an MHC class I molecule is depicted in Figure 5.5. It comprises a glycosylated heavy chain (45 kDa) non-covalently associated with β2-microglobulin (12 kDa), which is a polypeptide that is also found free in serum.

The class I heavy chain consists of:

The three extracellular domains each comprise about 90 amino acids:

The extracellular portion of the class I heavy chain is glycosylated, the degree of glycosylation depending on the species and haplotype.

The predominantly hydrophobic transmembrane region comprises 25 amino acid residues and traverses the lipid bilayer, most probably in an α-helical conformation.

The hydrophilic cytoplasmic domain, 30–40 residues long, may be phosphorylated in vivo.

Variations in amino acid sequence change the shape of the binding groove

Comparison of the structures of HLA-A2 and HLA-Aw68 have further refined our understanding of the structural basis for the binding of peptide to class I antigens.

The differences between HLA-A2 and HLA-Aw68 result from amino acid side-chain differences at 13 positions:

Ten of the twelve differences between HLA-A2 and HLA-Aw68 are at positions lining the floor and side of the peptide-binding groove (see Fig. 5.6). These differences give rise to dramatic differences in the shape of the groove and on the antigen peptides that it will bind.

Seen in detail, the peptide-binding groove forms a number of ridges and pockets with which amino acid side chains can interact. Typically the groove of an MHC class I molecule will accommodate peptides of eight or nine residues.

Amino acid variations within the peptide-binding groove can vary the positions of the pockets, providing the structural basis for differences in peptide-binding affinity that in turn govern exactly what is presented to a T cell (Fig. 5.7).

MHC class II molecules resemble MHC class I molecules in their overall structure

The products of the MHC class II genes are:

These products are heterodimers of heavy (α) and light (β) glycoprotein chains, and both chains are encoded in the MHC:

A number of lines of evidence indicate that the α and β chains have the same overall structures. An extracellular portion comprising two domains (α1 and α2 or β1 and β2) is connected by a short sequence to a transmembrane region of about 30 residues and a cytoplasmic domain of about 10 to 15 residues.

The α2 and β2 domains are similar to the class I α3 domain and β2-microglobulin, possessing the structural characteristics of immunoglobulin constant domains.

The β1 domain contains a disulfide bond, which generates a 64 amino acid loop.

The difference in molecular weights of the class II α and β chains is due primarily to differential glycosylation:

The β2 domain does, however, contain a binding site for CD4, and MHC class II molecules on APCs interact with CD4 on T cells in a manner analogous to the interaction of MHC class I molecules with CD8. CD4 and CD8 are important elements in the recruitment of kinases that signal T cell activation.

Despite the differences in length and organization of the polypeptide chains, the overall three-dimensional structure of MHC class II molecules is very similar to that of MHC class I molecules (Fig. 5.8).

Peptide binding properties of MHC molecules

The MHC class II binding groove accommodates longer peptides than MHC class I

The structures of MHC class I and class II molecules reflect their functional differences.

The binding groove of MHC class II molecules is more open than that of MHC class I molecules, to accommodate longer peptides (Figs 5.9 and 5.10):

The structural features of the class II antigen-binding site have been illuminated by determination of the crystal structure of HLA-DR1 complexed with an influenza virus peptide. Pockets clearly visible within the peptide-binding site accommodate five side chains of the bound peptide and explain the peptide specificity of HLA-DR1.

The precise topology of the MHC peptide-binding groove depends partly on the nature of the amino acids within the groove, and thus varies from one haplotype to the next.

Which peptide can bind to a particular MHC molecule depends on the nature of the side chains of the peptide and their complementarity with the MHC molecule’s binding groove. Some amino acid side chains of the peptide stick out of the groove and are available to contact the TCR.

Peptides are held in MHC molecule binding grooves by characteristic anchor residues

It is possible to purify and sequence peptides that have been generated by a cell and then bound by MHC molecules at the cell surface. These peptides include:

Interactions at the N and C termini confine peptides to the binding groove of MHC class I molecules

A number of peptides bound by particular MHC molecules have been sequenced, and characteristic residues identified – one at the C terminus and another close to the N terminus of the peptide. These characteristic motifs distinguish sets of binding peptides for different MHC class I molecules (Fig. 5.11).

The significance of the conserved residues has become clear by analysis of the three-dimensional structures of several MHC class I molecules, which have generated a clear picture of the peptide residing in the binding groove:

This picture is consistent with the characteristic motifs found at the ends of peptides eluted from class I molecules.

Antigen presentation by MHC molecules

Once the structures of the TCR and the MHC–peptide complex had been established, the next question was to determine how they interacted.

The first crystallographic data were derived using a co-crystal of a mouse MHC class I molecule bound to an endogenous cellular peptide and αβ TCR (Fig. 5.13). This structure showed that the axis of the TCR was roughly aligned with the peptide-binding groove on the MHC molecule, but set at 20–30° askew. This means that:

The molecular structure therefore underpins the experimental findings that T cells recognize antigenic peptides bound to particular MHC molecules.

This arrangement of TCR and MHC–antigen is broadly comparable to those found with the small number of receptors so far analyzed by X-ray crystallography.

Aggregation of TCRs initiates T cell activation

Although basic models of T cell activation by antigen–MHC show one receptor being triggered by one complex (e.g. Fig. 1.12), this is simplistic.

Each T cell may express 105 receptors and each APC has a similar number of MHC molecules. If a T cell engages an APC, only a tiny proportion of the MHC–antigen complexes on its surface will be of the correct type to be recognized by the T cell.

What, then, is the minimum signal for T cell activation? In practice:

The model of the TCR shown in Figure 5.3 suggests that it can form a dimeric structure clustered around the signaling molecules of the CD3 complex.

Interestingly, there is some evidence that MHC molecules can also dimerize, and that TCRs bound to MHC–peptide complexes tend to form dimers or aggregates. These observations have led to the view that T cell activation requires the cooperative aggregation of specific TCRs with MHC–peptide complexes.

The auxiliary molecules CD4 and CD8 are also important in T cell activation, and the presence of CD4 or CD8 can help stabilize the interaction of the TCR and MHC–peptide. In addition, kinases associated with these molecules are brought into proximity with CD3 so they can phosphorylate the ζζ dimer that initiates activation (Fig. 5.14). The ensuing steps are described in Chapter 8.

What constitutes T cell specificity?

Finally we should consider the question of what constitutes T cell specificity. When the specificity of lymphocytes was first explained in Chapter 1, it was stated that each lymphocyte binds to just one antigen using its receptor. Although this is a useful starting point for understanding immune responses, it is not strictly true.

In Chapter 3 it was seen that immunoglobulins could bind to different antigens if they had epitopes that were sufficiently similar. This chapter has shown that antigenic peptides can be mutated and still bind and trigger T cell activation.

One question, then, is how far a peptide can be mutated and still bind to its own TCR. In some cases it has been possible to individually change each amino acid in a peptide without destroying its ability to bind to the MHC molecule or the TCR.

Provided the peptide can form part of the TCR–MHC–peptide complex and provide sufficient binding energy, its precise amino acid sequence does not matter. This is a very important observation.

Later, when we consider how antigenic peptides from microorganisms can trigger autoimmune diseases (see Chapter 20), we learn that one possible mechanism is that a self peptide and a foreign peptide are sufficiently similar to bind to the same T cell, so causing a breakdown in self tolerance. One conclusion from the work cited above is that such peptides do not have to be identical to be cross-reactive.

Genetic organization of the MHC

The number of gene loci for MHC class I and class II molecules varies between species and between different haplotypes within each species, and many polymorphic variants have been described at each of the loci.

Much of the original work on the MHC was done using mice and what has been learned from these studies has been broadly applicable to humans.

Mice have two or three MHC class I loci

The mouse MHC (H-2) has two or three MHC class I loci, but the number of MHC class I genes varies between haplotypes (Fig. 5.w2).

MHC class I genes involved in antigen presentation to T cells are located in H-2K, H-2D, and H-2L loci.

The organization of the H-2K region is similar in all strains that have been studied. It contains two class I genes, termed K and K2:

The numbers of genes in the H-2D and H-2L loci are variable (see Fig. 5.w2).

Human MHC class II genes are located in the HLA-D region

The human MHC class II region spans about 1000 kb of DNA, and the order and orientation of the various loci are similar to that of the homologous loci in the mouse MHC class II region.

The HLA-D region encodes at least six α and ten β chain genes for MHC class II molecules (Fig. 5.16). Three loci (DR, DQ, and DP) encode the major expressed products of the human MHC class II region, but additional genes have also been identified:

DR, DQ, and DP α chains associate in the cell primarily with β chains of their own loci. For example:

The organization and length of the DRB region varies in different haplotypes (Fig. 5.17), with different numbers of β chains expressed.

The MHC class II region also contains genes that encode proteins involved in antigen presentation that are not expressed at the cell surface (see Chapter 8).image

MHC polymorphism is concentrated in and around the peptide-binding cleft

A hallmark of the MHC is the extreme degree of polymorphism (structural variability) of the molecules encoded within it. The class Ib molecules are much less polymorphic than the classical class I and II molecules. New allelic variants are identified frequently and logged on dedicated databases (see Internet references).

Within a particular MHC class I or class II molecule, the structural polymorphisms are clustered in particular regions. The amino acid sequence variability in class I molecules is clustered in three main regions of the α1 and α2 domains. The α3 domain appears to be much more conserved.

In MHC class II molecules, the extent of variability depends on the subregion and on the polypeptide chain. For example:

In outbred populations in which individuals have two MHC haplotypes, hybrid class II molecules with one chain from each haplotype can be produced. This generates additional structural diversity in the expressed molecules.

Most of the polymorphic amino acids in MHC class I and class II molecules are clustered on top of the molecule around the peptide-binding site (see Fig. 5.6). Variation is therefore centered in the base of the antigen-binding groove or pointing in from the sides of the α helices. This polymorphism affects the ability of the different MHC molecules to bind antigenic peptides.

MHC haplotype and disease susceptibility

Genetic variations in MHC molecules affect:

Knowing this, we can start to answer the question of why the MHC is so polymorphic. The immune system must handle many different pathogens. By having several different MHC molecules, an individual can present a diverse range of antigens and is therefore likely to be able to mount an effective immune response. There is therefore a selective advantage in having different MHC molecules.

Going beyond this, we know that different pathogens are prevalent in different areas of the world, so evolutionary pressures from pathogens will tend to select for different MHC molecules in different regions.

The specificity of the TCR and MHC explains genetic restrictions in antigen presentation

Much of the original work on antigen presentation was carried out using strains of mice that had been inbred to the point where both maternal and paternal chromosomes were identical. Any offspring therefore inherited the same set of autosomes from each parent, and the offspring were genetically identical to their parents. Clearly the level of diversity in the MHC molecules was much less than in an outbred human population.

The artificial simplicity of the inbred mouse system, however, allowed immunologists to dissect how antigens were presented to T cells in a whole animal, when the molecular structures of the MHC molecules and the TCR were completely unknown.

The key experiment that demonstrated the importance of the MHC in antigen presentation revealed a phenomenon called genetic restriction (also known as MHC restriction). In essence, it was noted that cytotoxic T cells from a mouse infected with a virus are primed to kill cells of the same H-2 haplotype infected with that virus; they do not kill cells of a different haplotype infected with the same virus (Fig. 5.18).

These data, and similar experiments using APCs and helper T cells, showed that T cells that have been primed to recognize antigen presented on MHC molecules of one haplotype will normally respond again only when they see the same antigen on the same MHC molecule.

Peter Doherty and Rolf Zinkernagel performed the key experiments delineating the phenomenon of MHC restriction of T cell responses in the mid 1970s and were awarded the Nobel Prize in Physiology or Medicine in 1996 for this work.

Presentation of lipid antigens by CD1

CD1 molecules are structurally related to MHC class I molecules and are non-covalently bound to β2-microglobulin.

The genes encoding CD1 molecules are located outside the MHC and are not polymorphic. In humans, they consist of five closely linked genes, of which four are expressed (Fig. 5.19), encoding proteins that fall into two separate groups:

Murine CD1b has been crystallized and analyzed by X-ray crystallography. This shows that the molecule has a deep electrostatically neutral antigen-binding groove, which is highly hydrophobic and can accommodate lipid or glycolipid antigens (see Fig. 5.w3). imageOne model for the binding places hydrophobic acyl groups of the lipids into the large hydrophobic pockets, leaving the more polar groups of the antigens such as phosphate and carbohydrate on the top, where they can interact with the TCR.

The binding requirements of the hydrophobic pockets on CD1 are fairly tolerant because they will accommodate acyl groups of different lengths, but the interactions with the TCR are much more specific – small changes in the structure of the carbohydrate moiety will destroy the ability to stimulate a T cell.

The antigens presented by the group I CD1 molecules and CD1d are different. For example, group I molecules present lipoarabinomannan, a component of the cell wall of mycobacteria (see Fig. 14.1), whereas CD1d cannot do this.

Another difference between CD1 and conventional MHC molecules is the way in which antigen is loaded into the antigen-binding groove:

There is some debate about the physiological functions of the CD1 molecules in host defense:

Critical thinking: Somatic hypermutation (see p. 434 for explanation)

The specificity of T cells (see p. 434 for explanation)

SM/J mice of the haplotype H-2v were immunized with the λ repressor protein, a molecule with 102 amino acid residues. After 1 week, T cells were isolated from the animals and set up in culture with APCs and antigen. The ability of APCs to activate the T cells was determined in a lymphocyte proliferation assay.

It was found that when APCs from SM/J mice were used in the culture the T cells were activated, but that when APCs from Balb/c mice were used (H-2d) they were not activated. APCs from F1 (SM/J•Balb/c) mice were able to activate the T cells just as well as the APCs from the parental SM/J strain.

Further reading

Bentley G.A., Mariuzza R.A. The structure of the T cell antigen receptor. Annu Rev Immunol. 1996;14:563–590.

Bjorkman P.J., Parham P. Structure, function and diversity of class I major histocompatibility complex molecules. Annu Rev Biochem. 1990;59:253–288.

Bjorkman P.J., Saper M.A., Samraoui B., et al. The structure of the human class I histocompatibility antigen HLA-A2. Nature. 1987;329:506–512.

Bjorkman P.J., Samraoui B., Bennett W.S., et al. The foreign antigen binding site and T-cell recognition regions of class I histocompatibility antigens. Nature. 1987;329:512–516.

Bodmer J.G., Marsh S.E., Albert E.D., et al. Nomenclature for factors of the HLA system, 1994. Tissue Antigens. 1994;44:1–18.

Brenner M.B., MacLean J., Dialynas D.P., et al. Identification of a putative second T-cell receptor. Nature. 1986;322:145–149.

Brown J.H., Jardetzky T.S., Gorga J.C., et al. Three-dimensional structure of the human class II histocompatibility antigen HLA-DR1. Nature. 1993;364:33–39.

Burdin N., Kronenberg M. CD1-mediated immune responses to glycolipids. Curr Opin Immunol. 1999;111:326–331.

Carosella E.D., Dausett J., Kirzenbaum H. HLA-G revisited. Immunol Today. 1996;17:407–409.

Chien Y.-H., Jores R., Crowley M.P. Recognition by γδ T cells. Annu Rev Immunol. 1996;14:511–532.

Davis M.M., Bjorkman P.J. T-cell antigen receptor genes and T-cell recognition. Nature. 1988;334:395–402.

Davis M.M., Boniface J.J., Reich Z., et al. Ligand recognition by αβ T cells. Annu Rev Immunol. 1998;16:523–544.

Garcia K.C., Degano M., Stanfield R.L., et al. An αβ T cell receptor structure at 2.5Å and its orientation in the TCR–MHC. Complex Sci. 1996;274:209–219.

Garcia K.C., Teyton G.L., Wilson I.A. Structural basis of T cell recognition. Annu Rev Immunol. 1999;17:369–398.

Garratt T.P.J., Saper M.A., Bjorkman P.J., et al. Specificity pockets for the side chains of peptide antigens in HLA-w68. Nature. 1989;342:692–696.

Hass W., Pereira P., Tonegawa S. Gamma/delta cells. Annu Rev Immunol. 1993;11:637–685.

Hayday A.C. γδ cells: a right time and a right place for a conserved third way of protection. Annu Rev Immunol. 2000;18:975–1026.

Hunkapiller T., Hood L. Diversity of the immunoglobulin gene superfamily. Adv Immunol. 1989;44:1–63.

Lefranc M.-P., Rabbitts T.H. The human T-cell receptor γ (TRG) genes. Trends Biochem Sci. 1989;14:214–218.

Leiden J.M. Transcriptional regulation of T cell receptor genes. Annu Rev Immunol. 1993;11:539–570.

Madden D.R., Gorga J.C., Strominger L., et al. The structure of HLA-B27 reveals nonamer self-peptides bound in an extended conformation. Nature. 1991;353:321–325.

Manning T.C., Kranz D.M. Binding energetics of T-cell receptors: correlation with immunological consequences. Immunol Today. 1999;20:417–422.

Porcelli S.A., Segelke B.W., Sugita M., et al. The CD1 family of lipid antigen-presenting molecules. Immunol Today. 1998;19:362–368.

Powis S.H., Trowsdale J. Human major histocompatibility complex genes. Behring Inst Mitt. 1994;94:17–25.

Raulet D.H. How γδ T cells make a living. Curr Biol. 1994;4:246–251.

Roth D.B. Generating antigen receptor diversity. Lewin B., ed. Immunology module of Virtual Text. 2005. www.ergito.com. Chapter 5

Salter R.D., Benjamin R.J., Wesley P.K., et al. A binding site for the T-cell co-receptor CD8 on the α3 domain of HLA-A2. Nature. 1990;345:41–46.

San José E., Sahuquillo A.G., Bragado R., Alarcón B. Assembly of the TCR/CD3 complex: CD3 epsilon/delta and CD3 epsilon/gamma dimers associate indistinctly with both TCR alpha and TCR beta chains. Evidence for a double TCR heterodimer model. Eur J Immunol. 1998;28:12–21.

Sloan-Lancaster J., Allen P.M. Altered peptide–ligand induced partial T cell activation: molecular mechanisms and role in T cell biology. Annu Rev Immunol. 1996;14:1–27.

Stern L.J., Wiley D.C. Antigenic peptide binding by class I and class II histocompatibility proteins. Structure. 1994;2:245–251.

Stern L.J., Brown J.H., Jardetzky T.S., et al. Crystal structure of the human class II MHC protein HLA-DR1 complexed with an influenza virus peptide. Nature. 1994;368:215–221.

Weiss A., Littman D.R. Signal transduction by lymphocyte antigen receptor. Cell. 1994;76:263–274.

Zeng Z.H., Castaño L.H., Segelke B., et al. The crystal structure of mouse CD1: an MHC-like fold with a large hydrophobic binding groove. Science. 1997;277:339–345.