Suture suspension for face and neck

Published on 22/05/2015 by admin

Filed under Plastic Reconstructive Surgery

Last modified 22/04/2025

Print this page

rate 1 star rate 2 star rate 3 star rate 4 star rate 5 star
Your rating: none, Average: 0 (0 votes)

This article have been viewed 2025 times

CHAPTER 27 Suture suspension for face and neck

History

Nature provides us with many barbed structures; such as the honeybee stinger, the woodpecker tongue and the porcupine quill; all can penetrate but defy being withdrawn. These barbs are all in one direction. In the early 1960s, Alcamo advanced the prehistoric inventions of a barbed fishing hook and arrowhead when he proposed a unidirectionally barbed suture.

In 1967 Alan McKenzie, M.D. reported on a bidirectionally barbed device he had created for tendon repair. None of these efforts were sustained.

In the early 1990s Ruff developed a bidirectional barbed device (Fig. 27.1), as well as its means of manufacture and method of use. Placed by a cannula or by needles deployed in opposite directions, one set of barbs anchors the other and eliminates the need to tie a knot to secure the end. The potential advantages over a knotted loop include less ischemic necrosis, greater surgeon control of tissue approximation, more speed and obviation of the manifold problems of the knot itself. The ability to realign tissues along the array of barbs may not only be used to compress the edges of a wound together, but also to reverse the ptosis associated with aging and weight loss. In the late 1990s, Drs. Harry Buncke and Marten Sulimanidze independently described similar concepts. The USFDA approved the use of barbed sutures for tissue suspension and approximation in 2003.

Currently barbed sutures are available in the US in permanent and absorbable polymers for tissue approximation.

Anatomy

Suspension of the skin constitutes the patient’s chief goal. As with open surgery, the placement of a barbed suture should elevate the subcutaneous fat as well. Likewise the barbs should be sufficiently deep in the fat to minimize distortion of the skin. The retinacula cutis of the face engages barbs surprisingly well, eliminating the need to enter the dermis. That being said, the barbs can lift the SMAS fascia in the cheek as well as SMAS muscles such as the platysma and the frontalis. Accordingly, knowledge of the thickness of the subcutaneous layer is important as is an appreciation of the gliding planes and cutaneous ligaments.

The force applied to the barbs in the face must be countered by an equally forceful opposite one. If the respective ends go in opposite directions, only half the barbs lift the face. In a U-shaped configuration, all the barbs engage the target and so this is more commonly used (Fig. 27.2).

The forehead

The suture is anchored under the galea and extends toward the brow in the deep subcutaneous fat (Fig. 27.3). It is important to avoid placing the suture deep to the frontalis in the loose areolar plane because it will elevate the brows poorly and may “click” when the frontalis contracts. The vector of the lift is reviewed as the patient looks in the mirror.

The supraorbital notch should be avoided, lest traction cause dysesthesias.

Technical steps

The preceding sections on physical evaluation and anatomy have addressed the most pertinent reciprocities when selecting a vector and ancillary conditions that merit treatment.

With regard to the technique, it must be emphasized that more barbs are better for important reasons; each barb will be subjected to less force, hence less tissue creep or relapse, and broader distribution of the load lessens distortions of the skin.

For closed lifts, a permanent suture is preferred because the collagenous support of the face and neck remodel slowly when unwounded. For open procedures using an absorbable polydioxanone persists long enough for substantial wound strength to develop.

Closed lifts

The polypropylene suture used herein has been withdrawn from the market and a replacement is being sought. The vector of lift is selected with the patient’s input. Usually local anesthesia will suffice with a benzalkonium prep. Two punctures 1.5 cm apart are made with an iris scissor after trimming the few adjacent hairs. The exit wound is dilated further with the scissor tips. The tip of the long straight needle is bent into image of a circle with a chord of 1.5 cm, so it can easily pass from one puncture to the other.

A stout needle holder not only bends the needle, but provides reliable angular control of the curved needle. This initial passage of the needle provides the anchor and must therefore penetrate the relevant fascia. For the galea it skives just above the periosteum; more inferiorly when the tip engages the deep temporal fascia and the needle is pushed laterally, the skin remains stable relative to the deep structures. With a more superficial bite, and the skin moves over them. In the pre- and postauricular areas, a deep bite is taken and the security is assessed by lifting the tissue toward the surface. The needle then exits and is straightened while advancing the transition point of the barbs into the anchoring bite.

With one needle and its corresponding set of barbs emerging from each puncture, each needle is directed into its respective wound to a depth of 2 to 3 mm, then turned toward the distal target. The tip oscillates left and right in a plane parallel with the skin. Abrupt changes in its depth, however, will create depressions in the skin and are to be scrupulously avoided. This sinuous path provides more holding strength and a measure of elasticity to withstand ballistic movements of the face. Emerging from the skin just short of the target, the tip is again bent into a image circle and clamped in the needle holder to control its rotation. The tip is withdrawn into the fat and thrust forward and out of the skin. This terminal curve adds strength and also deflects the suture’s end when the tissues are compressed, as when the patient smiles or raises the brow.

The ends of the suture are pulled distally to ‘seat’ the anchor while a single skin hook releases any tethering of the skin at the punctures and extracts any hair from them. Then the tissues are gently pushed proximally and the suture truncated by depressing the skin at the exit so that the end will lie several millimeters below the dermis.

For lower face and neck, the needles are straight and threaded by hand. For the midface and brow, they are arched to approximate the curvature of the face and then the needle holder applied to control rotation. As the needle oscillates in the forehead, the skin should move about half as much. If the needle is in the gliding plane deep to the frontalis, the skin will be minimally engaged. If the dermis is engaged the skin will more as much as the needle.

Open techniques

For patients with moderate laxity which creates significant brunching near the hairline, an open procedure might be best with just enough undermining to excise the redundancy, usually about 3 cm, just superficial to the SMAS (Fig. 27.5). The anchor is readily performed under direct vision and then the needles woven through the exposed SMAS, smoothly transitioning to the subcutaneous layer distally. Further mobility might be achieved by additionally undermining the galea and superficial temporal fascia.

The workhorse of these options is the temporal incision. From this area, of course, the midface can be addressed, but the pull is sufficiently vertical when directed at the jowls to suspend the neck as well (Figs 27.627.10).

As an adjunct to conventional techniques, such as MACS lift or face with SMAS plication, the barbed suture can be woven through the platysma under direct vision, to augment or supplant the SMAS plication and purse-string sutures, and lift the brow with precise control of its shape (Figs 27.1127.13). When pre- and postauricular skin have been elevated, a very secure anchor can be created by passing the first bite under the intact scalp (Fig. 27.14).

Barbed sutures with ordinary curved needles can be used to approximate tissues with conventional suture patterns. The closure typically begins at the middle of the wound with one needle advancing in each direction. The surgeon controls the tension of each bite, for the barbs will not allow it to back out or migrate to where the wound is under the greatest tension, as it does with a smooth suture in a continuous closure (Fig. 27.15). A running horizontal mattress for the galea, sinuous subcuticular for the deep dermis or over-and-over to plicate the malar fat provide speed and security for the closure and bite-by-bite control of suture tension.

Complications

Skin distortion overlying the suture has necessitated further trimming of the end of the suture or removal of the entire filament. The forehead is the least forgiving area, perhaps due to the underlying skull. When the frontalis contracts the suture recoils and can push up.