Surgical Decompression for Spinal Stenosis

Published on 23/05/2015 by admin

Filed under Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation

Last modified 23/05/2015

Print this page

rate 1 star rate 2 star rate 3 star rate 4 star rate 5 star
Your rating: none, Average: 0 (0 votes)

This article have been viewed 1863 times

CHAPTER 87 Surgical Decompression for Spinal Stenosis

DEFINITION

Lumbar spinal stenosis is an abnormal narrowing of the osteoligamentous vertebral canal and/or the intervertebral foramina, which is responsible for compression of the thecal sac and/or the caudal nerve roots; narrowing of the vertebral canal may involve one or more levels and, at a single level, may affect the entire canal or a part of it.1 Thus, abnormal narrowing of the spinal canal may be considered as stenosis if two criteria are fulfilled: the narrowing involves the osteoligamentous spinal canal, and it causes compression of the neural structures.

If the concept of stenosis is not limited to the osteoligamentous canal, even disc herniation is, in the strictest sense, a stenotic condition because it causes a pathological narrowing of the spinal canal. However, the two conditions – disc herniation and stenosis – are so different in the pathogenesis and anatomoclinical characteristics, that they cannot be considered as a single pathological entity.

The second criterion emphasizes the concept of compression of the thecal sac and nerve roots. The term stenosis indicates a disproportion between the caliber of the container and the volume of the content. If the content is solid or semifluid, as in the vertebral canal, the dimensional disproportion results in compression of the content by the walls of the container. However, the disproportion is not strictly related to the anteroposterior dimensions of the vertebral canal, as believed by Verbiest.2 Severe compression of the neural structures may occur even if the sagittal dimensions of the canal are within normal limits. On the other hand, a midsagittal diameter of 10 mm or less does not necessarily lead to compression of the cauda equina.3 This is probably due to the fact that the neural structures develop in harmony with the dimensions of the canal. When this does not occur, the reserve space available for the thecal sac and/or the caudal nerve roots is variably reduced and, therefore, acquired constrictive conditions of even minor degree are sufficient to cause stenosis. If the narrowing is not severe enough to cause compression of the neural structures, the spinal canal is to be considered narrow but not stenotic. Therefore, a diagnosis of stenosis cannot be made solely on the basis of measurements of the size of the vertebral canal or the area of the thecal sac in the axial sections. The radiologic diagnosis of stenosis should be predicated upon the demonstration of compression of the neural structures, whether clinically symptomatic or asymptomatic, by an abnormally narrow osteoligamentous spinal canal (Fig. 87.1).

CLASSIFICATION

Site of constriction

Lumbar spinal stenosis can be distinguished, based on the site of constriction, as stenosis of the spinal canal or central stenosis, isolated stenosis of the nerve root canal or lateral stenosis, and stenosis of the intervertebral foramen (Table 87.1).

Table 87.1 Classification of Lumbar Spinal Stenosis

CENTRAL STENOSIS
  Primary
  Congenital
  Developmental
  Achondroplastic
  Constitutional
  Secondary
  Degenerative
  Simple
  With degenerative spondylolisthesis or scoliosis
  Late sequelae of fractures or infections
  Paget’s disease
  Combined
  Association of primary and secondary forms at the same vertebral level
ISOLATED LATERAL STENOSIS
  Primary
  Secondary
  Combined
STENOSIS OF THE INTERVERTEBRAL FORAMEN
  Primary
  Secondary
  Combined

In stenosis of the spinal canal, the entire area of the canal, as viewed on the axial plane, is usually constricted (Fig. 87.2). In other words, both the central portion of the canal and the lateral parts, occupied by the emerging nerve roots, are constricted. Therefore, the expression stenosis of the spinal canal is more correct than that of central stenosis, which would indicate constriction only of the central area. However, the authors will use the latter term because it has become the one commonly adopted.

Central stenosis, except for the rare forms due to vertebral malformations, or sequelae of fractures or infections, is located at the level of the intervertebral space, where there are the anatomical structures, such as the intervertebral disc, the apophyseal joints, and the ligamenta flava, which can change with aging or disease.

The nerve root canal or radicular canal corresponds to the lateral portion of the spinal canal (Fig. 87.3). This canal, which is more of an anatomical concept than a true canal, is the semitubular structure in which the nerve root, exiting from the thecal sac, travels before entering the intervertebral foramen. As for the central form, in the last decade, the term lateral stenosis has become the most widely used for this type of stenosis.

The term lateral stenosis is often used to indicate both nerve root canal stenosis and stenosis of the intervertebral foramen. The authors believe that the intervertebral foramen, which begins and ends at the level of the medial and the lateral border of the pedicle, respectively, should be considered as a distinct anatomical entity. Therefore, stenosis of the foramen should be differentiated from the other two forms of stenosis, although it can be associated, albeit rarely, with one of the two.

Type of stenosis

Three forms of stenosis can be identified: primary, secondary and combined (see Table 87.1).

Primary forms

Secondary forms

Central stenosis

If the sagittal dimensions of the spinal canal are normal, or at the lower limits, and compression of the caudal nerve roots is the result of one or more acquired conditions, such as spondylotic changes of the facet joints, abnormal thickening of the ligamenta flava, and bulging of the intervertebral discs, then this form is defined as simple degenerative stenosis (Fig. 87.6).

Very often, however, degenerative spondylolisthesis of the cranial vertebra of the motion segment is also present at one or, occasionally, two or more levels (Fig. 87.7). Degenerative spondylolisthesis is consistently responsible for narrowing of the spinal canal, but may not cause lateral or central stenosis. This is because the presence, type, and severity of stenosis is related to several factors, such as the constitutional dimensions of the spinal canal, the orientation (more or less sagittal), and the severity of degenerative changes of the facet joints, and the amount of vertebral slipping, which may in some cases play a minor role. For example, a grade I spondylolisthesis in a patient with a constitutionally large spinal canal produces no significant narrowing of the canal, would be categorized as no stenosis. In contrast, the same or even lesser grade of spondylolisthesis in a patient with a primarily narrow canal can be associated with clinically significant stenosis. The type of stenosis, that is whether stenosis is central or lateral, depends on the orientation of the articular processes and the length of the pedicles. Usually, stenosis initially presents as lateral and then central in later stages. Instability, that is hypermobility on flexion–extension radiographs, is one of the main characteristics of degenerative spondylolisthesis. However, in many cases there is no appreciable hypermobility of the slipped vertebra. The authors consider the latter condition as a potential instability, which can become unstable as a result of surgery. Such a scenario may arise following removal of a large part of one or both facet joints, unilateral or bilateral discectomy, or when destabilizing factors unable to stabilize a normal vertebra intervene, such as disc degeneration or severe degenerative changes of the facet joints. In degenerative spondylolisthesis, the intervertebral disc often bulges into the intervertebral foramen to cause stenosis. However, true stenosis of the foramen is rarely present as the foramen becomes larger in the sagittal dimensions in the presence of slipping of the cranial vertebra.

A particular form of acquired stenosis is the type that is associated with degenerative scoliosis. In this instance a role may be played by the scoliotic curve in tandem with the pure degenerative changes of the facet joints and the intervertebral discs.

Other forms of secondary stenosis include late sequelae of fractures or infectious diseases of the spine, which, however, are rare conditions. Rarely, stenosis can occur secondary to systemic bone diseases such as Paget’s disease. Paget’s disease can lead to an increase in volume and/or deformation of one or more vertebral components.

INDICATIONS FOR SURGERY

Surgery is contraindicated for a narrow spinal canal and is generally not indicated in patients who complain only of back pain, in the absence of deformities, such as degenerative spondylolisthesis or scoliosis. In patients with an unstable motion segment who have only back pain, it is usually sufficient to perform a fusion alone if stenosis is mild, because it is unlikely that neural compression will significantly increase and become symptomatic over time after fusion of the motion segment. In patients with no hypermobility it may be useful to apply a rigid corset for 2 weeks. If the back pain improves significantly, there may be an indication for surgery.

In patients with leg symptoms, surgery is indicated when comprehensive conservative management as described in other chapters of this book have been carried out for 4–6 months without resulting in significant improvement (Fig. 87.9). The exception to this recommendation is for patients with a severe motor and/or sensory deficit consistent with cauda equina syndrome, who require emergent neural decompression.

When the presentation is that of weakness with associated pain, then surgery is indicated when two criteria are met. The stenosis should be advanced and the symptoms should be of less than a few months duration. If the paresis or paralysis has been present for more that 6–8 months, then it is the authors’ opinion that there can be no indication for decompression. Such an extended duration of neural compression leads to irrevocable changes and ultimately surgery offers small or no chance of improvement of muscle function.

The ideal surgical candidates are less than 70 years old, without comorbidities, who have radiologic evidence of severe or very severe stenosis, long-standing leg symptoms and severe intermittent claudication, moderate or no motor deficits, and mild or no back pain. This is in contrast to patients who have mild stenosis, mild or inconsistent leg symptoms without a precise radicular distribution, a history of claudication after many hundreds of meters, no motor deficit and back pain of similar severity to, or more severe than, the leg symptoms. A less predictable outcome is associated with surgery in this latter group.

Usually, there is no need for spinal fusion. Arthrodesis may be indicated when there is a concern that wide surgical decompression could result in postoperative instability. Additionally, fusion may be required for the patient that is experiencing simultaneous radicular pain from spinal stenosis and axial back pain due to internal disc disruption syndrome (see Fig. 87.9).

Advanced age

Surgical decompression may offer significant relief of symptoms also to patients older than 70 years.58 In the authors’ experience, there is no significant difference in the results of surgery between the patients in early senile age and those aged 80–90 years old, provided the stenosis is severe and the patient’s general health is satisfactory.

Comorbidity

In one study,7 a high rate of comorbid illnesses was found to be inversely related to the rate of satisfactory results after surgery. Another study9 compared the long-term results of surgery in 24 diabetic and 22 nondiabetic patients. In the diabetic group there was a 41% rate of satisfactory results, compared with 90% in the nondiabetic group. Different results, however, were observed in a similar study,10 in which the outcome was satisfactory in 72% of the diabetic and 80% of the nondiabetic patients. Neither the duration of the diabetes before surgery nor its type correlated with the outcome. A mistaken preoperative diagnosis was the main cause of failure in diabetic patients. In many of the failures, diabetic neuropathy or angiopathy had elicited symptoms that had been confused with pseudoclaudication.

Previous surgery

Surgery for spinal stenosis tends to give less satisfactory results in patients who had previously undergone decompressive procedures in the lumbar spine.7,1114 This is particularly true when stenosis is at the same level or levels at which the previous surgery for disc herniation or stenosis had been performed.15

SURGICAL MANAGEMENT

Buy Membership for Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation Category to continue reading. Learn more here