Surgery of the lacrimal system

Published on 08/03/2015 by admin

Filed under Opthalmology

Last modified 22/04/2025

Print this page

rate 1 star rate 2 star rate 3 star rate 4 star rate 5 star
Your rating: none, Average: 3 (1 votes)

This article have been viewed 3988 times

CHAPTER 52 Surgery of the lacrimal system

See Video image

Background

Lacrimal surgery existed in the Middle Ages for the treatment of dacryocystitis from a blocked nasolacrimal duct, albeit restricted to crude external drainage of abscess and extirpation of the lacrimal sac. It is not until the late 18th century that more modern techniques for draining the tear sac into the nose were introduced and it took some years for such dacryocystorhinostomy (DCR) surgery to be widely available (Fig. 52.1).

image

Fig. 52.1 Diagram of endonasal DCR by West.

West JM, A window resection in the nasal duct in cases of stenosis. Trans Am Ophthalmol Soc 1910;12:654–8. Kept at Royal Society of Medicine in London.

The spectrum of lacrimal disease was significantly more severe in the pre-antibiotic area. The French Impressionist artist Camille Pissarro (1830–1903) apparently suffered from recurrent chronic dacryocystitis, an illness which prevented him from working for some periods of time and which is said to have influenced his paintings.

The most common cause of a watering eye (epiphora) is a blocked nasolacrimal duct. Simple watering eye from a narrowed nasolacrimal duct (stenosis or partial nasolacrimal duct obstruction) is also an indication for DCR. The spectrum of disease has changed from dacryocystitis to simpler partial nasolacrimal duct obstructions and hence the threshold for surgery changed to include operating on lesser degrees of obstruction. The sophistication of lacrimal surgery has also advanced using more precise and delicate surgical techniques with miniature powered intranasal tools. This shift is very similar to the shift in cataract surgery also seen over the last 20 years, from intracapsular to extracapsular cataract extraction for dense white cataracts or dark nucleosclerosis, then to phaco-extraction for nucleosclerosis and subtle lenticular opacity. Patient expectation of surgery has increased and quality of life studies show that a real benefit can be obtained for patients with watering eyes by dacryocystorhinostomy surgery, whether it is by the external or the endonasal approach.

In many centers lacrimal surgery is now done almost exclusively endonasally and predominantly endoscopically (a microscope can be used instead), using powered tools and functional endoscopic sinus surgery instruments for adult and pediatric DCR. Endonasal endoscopic monitoring of syringe and probing and endoscopic placement of Jones glass bypass tubes are also standard.

However, the external approach DCR through the skin remains a useful operation where endonasal equipment and skills are not available, and can be particularly important for learning the anatomy of the medial canthus and sac area.

Definitions

There are various abbreviations and different operations.

image

Fig. 52.2 Dacryocystorhinostomy (DCR).

Courtesy of Santiago Ortiz-Perez.

Table 52.1 Etymology of the term Dacryocystorhinostomy

4 parts: dacro – cysto – rhino – stomy
Ancient Greek Transliteration Translation
image dakruon tear
image kustis bladder, sac
image rhis nose
image stoma mouth

Normal anatomy

Etiology and assessment of watering eye

Blocked nasolacrimal duct in adults

The causes of a watering eye include hypersecretion and epiphora. Causes of hypersecretion (conjunctivitis, keratitis, corneal foreign body, etc.) should be excluded (Fig. 52.7A–D). Surgery of the lacrimal system is for epiphora, which is an outflow problem cause by a stenosis or obstruction of the lacrimal excretory system or very poor functional drainage, as for instance may occur in facial nerve paralysis.

The periorbital area should be examined and a mucocoele, dacyocystitis (Fig. 52.8), and fistula from the lacrimal sac should be excluded. Eyelid position, particularly punctual apposition to the globe, should also be recorded.

Canaliculitis is an often missed yet relatively common condition (Fig. 52.9). It is a simple diagnosis because the small swelling is medial to the punctum, which commonly has with some yellow discharge. It can be chronic and partially responsive to topical medication, with surgery the definitive treatment.

Serious causes of lacrimal outflow obstruction may rarely occur, such as a lacrimal sac or nasolacrimal duct tumor, and should be excluded by careful history and endonasal examination. Bloody tears may indicate a lacrimal sac tumor.

The most common cause of epiphora is chronic nasolacrimal duct mucosal inflammation and subsequent stenosis leading to complete obstruction, associated with nasal and sinus mucosal disease, chronic allergy, or upper respiratory tract infections. Rarer causes of epiphora include Wegener’s granulomatosis, sarcoidosis, previous maxillary sinus surgery, and intrinsic or extrinsic tumor. Rarely a lacrimal stone may cause obstruction with epiphora which then resolves after the stone is passed.

Assessment should include a thorough examination of the puncta, the fluorescein dye retention test, syringing and probing, and nasal endoscopy. Nasal endoscopy is done routinely preoperatively to check that there is no obvious nasal cause of the epiphora, determine the normal nasal anatomy, and see if there are any variations that may influence the success rate of surgery. It also allows an assessment of the nasal space to be carried out to see if there is enough space to introduce the instruments endonasally or whether there is a need for septoplasty or partial middle turbinectomy, in order to make more space. Additional imaging with radionucleotide (nuclear lacrimal scintigraphy) is often performed in partial obstruction in order to determine the level of the functional block, whereas dacryocystogram or CT dacryocystogram are reserved for assessing anatomic causes of a watering eye and the sinuses. All findings should be carefully recorded in the clinical record diagrammatically as well as with text, for clear communication.

External approach DCR surgery

This technique is regarded as the gold standard against to compare all other tear drainage operations. The results vary between 70 and 98% success. Anatomic and functional results should be measured by recording of subjective resolution of symptoms of watering ± mucous reflux resolved. Success should be assessed 6 months after surgery and after the tubes have been removed.

External DCR steps

Endoscopic endonasal DCR surgery [see Clip 6.13]

Ensocopic endonasal DCR (EE-DCR) can be performed in almost all patients for nasolacrimal duct obstruction. Septoplasty may be required, or other techniques such as partial middle turbinectomy, to create an amplified internal nasal space for instrument passage and tissue manipulation. It is important to maintain a good space in front of the ostium to prevent soft tissue adhesions, which could lead to surgical failure. Silicone tubes are placed. Local anti-metabolites such as mitomycin C reserved in high risk cases. The success rates are similar to external DCR.

Rongeurs can be used to remove the lower part of the thick maxillary bone to create a large ostium between the lacrimal sac and the nose. The higher thicker maxillary bone is removed with a diamond burr. Soft tissue mucosa can be fashioned with Blakesley forceps, ‘Thru’cut MacKay–Gruenwald nasal forceps, and a serrated oscillating blade or microdebrider.

When mechanical tools with a high speed diamond burr are used, surgery is under a general anesthetic due to continual saline irrigation of the burr head and bone and simultaneous constant aspiration of saline (Fig. 52.10). The diamond DCR burr is 2.5 mm wide and at an angle of 20° to its handle. It is used at 12 000 revs. The serrated oscillating blade (microdebrider) is 3.5 or 4 mm diameter wide and used at oscillating speeds of 1500 up to 5000, taking care not to debride soft tissue towards the orbit, to avoid inadvertent orbital damage.

Endonasal endoscopic DCR steps (Figs 52.1152.13)

Postoperative management after DCR surgery, external or endoscopic endonasal

Canaliculitis

Actinomycosis canaliculitis responds well to canalicular marsupialization (Fig. 52.16). If possible, try to open the canaliculus whilst preserving the punctual annular ring. The slit canaliculus can be subsequently re-sutured after intubation with a Mini-Monaka.

Re-do DCR [see Clips 6.15 and 6.16]

Failed DCR is usually due to a combination of factors including, most commonly, mucosal scarring across the ostium (membranous scarring) and/or a sump syndrome and/or inadequate bony removal (Figs 52.17 and 52.18). Endoscopic endonasal revision is a relatively simple procedure. Since the principle cause of failure is a scarred ostium, this must first be confirmed by probing and syringing of both the upper and lower canaliculus. Simultaneously, the endoscopic appearance of the ostium and surrounding structures is noted when a probe is in situ and it is possible to see if the membrane is densely scarred or thin. Some DCR ostiums fail because of chronic inflammation with granuloma formation within the ostium and sac remnant, which can be treated in a small number of cases with silver nitrate cautery. Usually the inflammation leads to scarring and need for subsequent re-do DCR.

Surgical revision of failed DCR is aided by additional procedures to make more room in the nose in front of the ostium, such as partial middle turbinectomy and anterior ethmoidectomy. The serrated oscillating blade microdebrider is used to revise mucosal scarring, with re-intubation with silicone O’Donoghue tubes.

Functional DCR failure can occur despite anatomic patency of the ostium if there is marked canalicular cheese-wiring (whole canaliculus slit open) which affects the functional drainage. Similarly, canalicular obstruction which cannot be overcome surgically is also an indication for conjunctival DCR.

Surgery in children

Congenital blocked nasaolacrimal duct in children

Management

Further reading

Agarwal S. Endoscopic dacryocystorhinostomy for acquired nasolacrimal duct obstruction. J Laryngol Otol. 2009;123(11):1226-1228.

Anari S, Ainsworth G, Robson AK. Cost-efficiency of endoscopic and external dacryocystorhinostomy. J Laryngol Otol. 2008;122(5):476-479.

Ben Simon GJ, Joseph J, Lee S, et al. External versus endoscopic dacryocystorhinostomy for acquired nasolacrimal duct obstruction in a tertiary referral center. Ophthalmology. 2005;112(8):1463-1468.

Boboridis K, Olver JM. Endoscopic endonasal assistance with Jones lacrimal bypass tubes. Ophthalmic Surg Lasers. 2000;31(1):43-48.

Brookes JL, Olver JM. Endoscopic endonasal management of prolapsed silicone tubes after dacryocystorhinostomy. Ophthalmology. 1999;106(11):2101-2105.

Caldwell GW. Two new operations for obstruction of the nasal duct. New York Med J. 1893:581-582.

Choussy O, Retout A, Marie JP, et al. Endoscopic revision of external dacryocystorhinostomy failure. Rhinology. 2010;48(1):104-107.

Codère F, Denton P, Corona J. Endonasal dacryocystorhinostomy: a modified technique with preservation of the nasal and lacrimal mucosa. Ophthal Plast Reconstr Surg. 2010;26(3):161-164.

Dolman PJ. Comparison of external dacryocystorhinostomy with nonlaser endonasal dacryocystorhinostomy. Ophthalmology. 2003;110(1):78-84.

Eichhorn K, Harrison AR. External vs. endonasal dacryocystorhinostomy: six of one, a half dozen of the other? Curr Opin Ophthalmol. 2010;21(5):396-403.

Elmorsy SM, Fayk HM. Nasal endoscopic assessment of failure after external dacryocystorhinostomy. Orbit. 2010;29(4):197-201.

Fayers T, Laverde T, Tay E, et al. Lacrimal surgery success after external dacryocystorhinostomy: functional and anatomical results using strict outcome criteria. Ophthal Plast Reconstr Surg. 2009;25(6):472-475.

Feretis M, Newton JR, Ram B, et al. Comparison of external and endonasal dacryocystorhinostomy. J Laryngol Otol. 2009;123(3):315-319.

Javate RM, Campomanes BSJr, Co ND, et al. The endoscope and the radiofrequency unit in DCR surgery. Ophthal Plast Reconst Surg. 1995;11(1):54-58.

Hartikainen J, Antila J, Varpula M, et al. Prospective randomized comparison of endonasal endoscopic dacryocystorhinostomy and external dacryocystorhinostomy. Laryngoscope. 1998;108(12):1861-1866.

Konuk O, Kurtulmusoglu M, Knatova Z, et al. unsuccessful lacrimal surgery: causative factors and results of surgical management in a tertiary referral center. Ophthalmolgica. 2010;224:361-366.

Lee DW, Chai CH, Loon SC. Primary external dacryocystorhinostomy versus primary endonasal dacryocystorhinostomy: a review. Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 2010;38(4):418-426.

Leibovitch I, Selva D, Tsirbas A, et al. Paediatric endoscopic endonasal dacryocystorhinostomy in congenital nasolacrimal duct obstruction. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 2006;244(10):1250-1254.

Leong SC, Macewen CJ, White PS. A systematic review of outcomes after dacryocystorhinostomy in adults. Am J Rhinol Allergy. 2010;24(1):81-90.

Lim C, Martin P, Benger R, et al. Lacrimal canalicular bypass surgery with the Lester Jones tube. Am J Ophthalmol. 2004;37(1):101-108.

Madge SN, Malhotra R, Desousa J, et al. The lacrimal bypass tube for lacrimal pump failure attributable to facial palsy. Am J Ophthalmol. 2010;149(1):155-159.

Malhotra R, Wright M, Olver JM. A consideration of the time taken to do dacryo-cystorhinostomy (DCR) surgery. Eye (Lond). 2003;17(6):691-696.

Marr JE, Drake-Lee A, Willshaw HE. Management of childhood epiphora. Br J Ophthalmol. 2005;89(9):1123-1126.

Mathew MR, McGuiness R, Webb LA, et al. Patient satisfaction in our initial experience with endonasal endoscopic non-laser dacryocystorhinostomy. Orbit. 2004;23(2):77-85.

McDonogh M, Meiring JH. Endoscopic transnasal dacryocystorhinostomy. J Laryngol Otol. 1989;103(6):585-587.

Metson R. Endoscopic surgery for lacrimal obstruction. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 1991;104(4):473-479.

Minasian M, Olver JM. The value of nasal endoscopy after dacryocystorhinostomy. Orbit. 1999;18(3):167-176.

Moore WM, Bentley CR, Olver JM. Functional and anatomic results after two types of endoscopic endonasal dacryocystorhinostomy: surgical and holmium laser. Ophthalmology. 2002;109(8):1575-1582.

Naik MN, Kelapure A, Rath S, et al. Management of canalicular lacerations: epidemiological aspects and experience with Mini-Monoka monocanalicular stent. Am J Ophthalmol. 2008;145(2):375-380.

Narioka J, Ohashi Y. Transcanalicular-endonasal semiconductor diode laser-assisted revision surgery for failed external dacryocystorhinostomy. Am J Ophthalmol. 2008;146(1):60-68.

Nemet AY, Fung A, Martin PA, et al. Lacrimal drainage obstruction and dacryocystorhinostomy in children. Eye (Lond). 2008;22(7):918-924.

Olver JM. The success rates for endonasal dacryocystorhinostomy. Br J Ophthalmol. 2003;87(11):1431.

Olver JM. Tips on how to avoid the DCR scar. Orbit. 2005;24(2):63-66. Review

Repp DJ, Burkat CN, Lucarelli MJ. Lacrimal excretory system concretions: canalicular and lacrimal sac. Ophthalmology. 2009;116(11):2230-2235.

Spielmann PM, Hathorn I, Ahsan F, et al. The impact of endonasal dacryocystorhinostomy (DCR), on patient health status as assessed by the Glasgow benefit inventory. Rhinology. 2009;47(1):48-50.

Tsirbas A, Davis G, Wormald PJ. Mechanical endonasal dacryocystorhinostomy versus external dacryocystorhinostomy. Ophthal Plast Reconst Surg. 2004;20(1):50.

Welham RAN, Wulc AE. Management of unsuccessful lacrimal surgery. Br J Ophthalmol. 1987;71:152-157.

Woog JJ, Kennedy RH, Custer PL, et al. Endonasal Dacryocystorhinostomy: A Report by the American Academy of Ophthalmology. Ophthalmology. 2001;108(12):2369-2377.

Wormald PJ. Powered endoscopic dacryocystorhinostomy. Laryngoscope.. 2002;112:69-72.

Yoon SW, Yoon YS, Lee SH. Clinical results of endoscopic dacryocsytorhinostomy using a microdebrider. Korean J Ophthalmol. 2006;20(1):1-6.