Superficial to Medium-Depth Peels: A Personal Experience

Published on 15/03/2015 by admin

Filed under Dermatology

Last modified 22/04/2025

Print this page

rate 1 star rate 2 star rate 3 star rate 4 star rate 5 star
Your rating: none, Average: 0 (0 votes)

This article have been viewed 2390 times

13 Superficial to Medium-Depth Peels

A Personal Experience

Introduction

Chemical peeling is the process of applying chemicals to the skin to destroy the outer damaged layers, thus accelerating the normal process of exfoliation. With respect to the depth of penetration and histological level of necrosis, chemical peels can be divided into:

Chemical peelings are used to reverse the signs of skin aging and to treat certain epidermal skin lesions as well as scars, particularly acne scars. Dyschromias, wrinkles and acne scars are the major clinical indications for facial chemical peeling. Dyschromias include ephelides (freckles), lentigo simplex, senile lentigo, melasma, and post-inflammatory hyperpigmentation. The efficacy of chemical peels depends mostly on the histological depth of the lesions. For instance, in a patient with epidermal dyschromia and fine wrinkling due to papillary dermal atrophy and damage, a medium deep peel can restore the papillary and epidermal damage ; this is because an epidermal peel can only improve the dyschromia and has little or no effect on wrinkling.

Chemical peeling as a therapeutic modality for acne has many benefits:

The Problem Being Treated

The main aim of this chapter is to provide our practical treatment guidelines for various cutaneous indications.

Proper patient selection along with determination of the most appropriate type of peeling agent, concentration and the time of application required to treat a specific disorder will optimize benefits and minimize potential side effects.

Patient selection

The success of a chemical peel depends on careful selection of patient and individualization of treatment. Patients with mild facial rhytides and/or minimal dyschromias are the best candidates for superficial to medium-depth chemical peels. Deep rhytides and excessive facial laxity are likely to best respond to traditional rhytidectomy as the primary procedure and chemical peeling as an adjunct. Careful evaluation of skin type and complexion is the first step. The Fitzpatrick classification of skin types (I–VI) is often used to help stratify a patient’s risk for pigmentary complications. Darker phototypes are at higher risk for developing postpeel hyperpigmentation especially after more aggressive peels, while lighter phototypes seem to be more susceptible to excessive penetration of the peeling agent. In all cases, careful monitoring during the procedure is prudent (Boxes 13.1, 13.2, Table 13.1).

Box 13.2

Wrinkle severity rating scale (WSRS)

Score Description
1 Absent: No visible fold; continuous skin line. Amelioration with TCA peels
2 Mild: Shallow but visible fold with a slight indentation; minor facial feature; improvement in skin texture with TCA peels
3 Moderate: Moderately deep folds; clear facial feature visible at normal appearance but not when stretched. Excellent correction with phenol peels
4 Severe: Very long and deep folds; prominent facial feature; less than 2 mm visible fold when stretched. Significant improvement expected with combined peels
5 Extreme: Extremely deep and long folds detrimental to facial appearance; 2–4 mm visible V-shaped fold when stretched. Unlikely to have satisfactory correction with medium and deep peelings alone

Table 13.1 Correlation among skin diseases and suggested peeling approach

Skin disease Diagnostic method Suggested approach
Comedonal Acne-papulo-pustular Global scorea

Melasma MASI scoreb

Photoaging Wrinkle severity indexc Xantelasma Clinical evaluation Acne scars
Box scar Goodman & Barron classificationd Rosacea Clinical evaluation Lentigo simplex Clinical evaluation Actinic keratosis Clinical evaluation Chicken pox Goodman & Barron classificationd

a Doshi A, Zaheer A, Stiller MJ 1997 A comparison of current acne grading systems and proposal of a novel system. International Journal of Dermatology 38:416–418

b See Box 13.1

c Day DJ, Littler CM, Swift RW, Gottlieb S 2004 The wrinkle severity rating scale: a validation study. American Journal of Clinical Dermatology 5(1):49–52

d Goodman GJ, Baron JA 2006 Postacne scarring: a qualitative global scarring grading system. Dermatologic Surgery 32:1458–1466

Patient expectations and lifestyle must also be evaluated. During the consultation, if it is evident that the patient overestimates the benefits that can be achieved or cannot tolerate long post peeling care and recovery time (as with medium-depth TCA peels), the physician must recommend an alternative treatment. Numerous skin disorders can be improved with chemical peeling.

Indications

Treatment Approach

The general principles of chemical peeling are easily remembered. Be familiar with the peeling agent you are using, and remember the microanatomy of the skin you are peeling. Thin skin peels faster than thick skin. The key factors which determine the depth of the wound that you create with the peeling agent (superficial, medium or deep) depends on three main factors: (1) the concentration of the agent; (2) the amount of pressure applied to the skin; and (3) the duration time of application.

Skin preparation is very important for superficial and medium peels. We feel that daily use of topical retinoid for 3–6 weeks before the procedure creates a better and more even penetration of the peeling solution in patients with sebaceous and hyperkeratotic skin. In thin-skinned patients, we do not utilize this retinoid regimen.

Standard baseline photography and an informed consent are always obtained prior to the procedure. Since the choice of the peeling agent is a very important step, we have recently developed a flowchart that can help doctors in the evaluation and management of potential candidates for chemical peels (see Figure 13.1).

Major determinants

Table 13.2 summarizes the main factors that can influence therapeutic efficacy and side effects of different chemical peels.

Table 13.2 Main factors that can influence therapeutic efficacy and side effects of different chemical peels

Chemical peel Advantages Disadvantages
Pyruvic acid Very mild erythema
Mild desquamation
Short postoperative period
Can be used in skin types III and IV
Excellent for acne
Intense stinging and burning sensation during application
Requires neutralization
Pungent and irritating vapors for the upper respiratory mucosa
Salicylic acid Excellent for acne
Given the appearance of the white precipitate, uniformity of application is easily evaluated
The peel induces an anesthetic effect that increases patient tolerance
Established safety profile in patients with skin types I–VI
Minimal efficacy in patients with significant photodamage
Limited depth of peeling
Resorcinol Easy to perform
Uniformity of application and penetration
Useful in acne, postinflammatory hyperpigmentation and melasma
Not painful (the burning sensation during the peeling is usually mild)
Cannot be used in summer
Resorcinol may cause allergic and toxic reactions
Unsafe in Fitzpatrick skin type higher than V
Desquamative effect aesthetically unacceptable
Trichloracetic acid Low-cost procedure
Uniformity of application and penetration
Evaluation of the frost, permits easy to modulate depth of penetration
Stinging and burning sensation during the application
High concentrations are not recommended in skin types V and VI
Hypo/hyperpigmentation can occur
Combination peels: Salicylic acid + TCA Efficacy in all skin types
Well tolerated in darker racial/ethnic groups
Most beneficial in treating recalcitrant melasma and postinflammatory hyperpigmentation
Increase penetration of superficial peeling
Increased desquamation in some patients lasting up to 7–10 days
Postinflammatory hyperpigmentation more common than with salicylic acid peeling alone
Glycolic acid Very mild erythema
Mild desquamation
Short postoperative period
Useful in photodamage
Burning sensation and erythema during application
No uniformity of application
Requires neutralization
Necrotic ulcerations if time of application is too long and/or skin pH is reduced
Cautious application in patients with active acne
Jessner’s solution Excellent safety profile
Can be used in all skin types
Substantial efficacy with minimal ‘downtime’
Enhances the penetration of TCA peel
Concerns regarding resorcinol toxicity, including thyroid dysfunction
Manufacturing variations
Instability with exposure to light and air
Excessive exfoliation in some patients

Patient interview

To better select the right patient for the right peel it is important to obtain a detailed history that evaluates all potential risks linked to the peeling agents. It is important to identify all potential factors that may adversely affect the outcome of a peel and fully characterize a patient’s skin type and propensity to scar and hyperpigment (see Table 13.3).

Table 13.3 Suggested questions and possible answers and discussion for patient interviews

Questions Possible answers and discussion
Do you have sensitive skin? Sensitive skin can develop adverse reactions even with superficial peels at low concentration.
Are you pregnant or breast-feeding? Some peels, such as salicylic acid, should be avoided in pregnant and breast-feeding women.
Are you allergic to topical or systemic drugs? Patients with glycolate hypersensitivity cannot be treated with glycolic acid; allergy to resorcinol, salicylic acid, or lactic acid are absolute contraindications to Jessner’s solution
Have you been treated with isotretinoin therapy within the last 6 months? This is a contraindication to deeper chemical peels
What do you expect from this treatment? Patients should not have unrealistic expectations
Do you have recurrent herpes simplex virus infection? History of recurrent herpes simplex virus infection requires systemic prophylaxis with antivirals starting a day before the procedure and continuing for 10 days until full reepithelilization

Treatment Techniques

Glycolic acid

Glycolic acid acts by thinning the stratum corneum, promoting epidermolysis and dispersing basal layer melanin. It increases dermal hyaluronic acid and collagen gene expression by increasing secretion of IL-6.

Glycolic acid is a useful adjunctive therapy in a variety of conditions including photodamage, acne scars, striae distensae, pseudofolliculitis barbae, hyperpigmentation disorders, actinic keratoses, fine wrinkles, lentigo, melasma and seborrheic keratoses. It may also reduce UV-induced skin tumor development and has been successfully utilized in exfoliative conditions such as ichthyosis, xeroderma and psoriasis. Concentrations and number of treatments depend on the diagnosis. The appearance of striae distensae alba on the abdomen or thighs can be improved with topical 20% glycolic acid daily. In melasma, a series of three monthly 50% glycolic acid peels can minimize unwanted pigmentation. In patients with comedonal acne, we typically perform 70% glycolic acid peels with an application time of 2–7 minutes. Glycolic acid peels are also helpful to reduce seborrhea and to prepare skin for more extensive photo rejuvenation. Sequential application of a Glycolic acid peel followed by TCA produces a uniform a medium-depth peel. This can be performed as a single procedure to treat actinic keratoses, mild rhytides, pigmentary dyschromias or depressed scars.

Pyruvic acid

Skin conditions that can be successfully treated with pyruvic acid include inflammatory acne, especially microcystic acne, ‘oily’ skin, moderate acne scars, warts, actinic keratosis, moderate photoaging (fine wrinkles, textural alterations, diffuse dyschromias, yellowing and mottling). Patients with photoaging can expect smoother skin texture, an improvement in fine wrinkles and an important reduction of hyperpigmented lesions (freckles and lentigines). Patients with acne and oily skin notice improvement of active acneic lesions and decreased seborrhoea. Pyruvic acid is our first choice in inflammatory acne and in macular acne scars. In our experience, this peeling agent is also the most effective peel in controlling rosacea.

While salicylic acid peels are our first choice in comedonal acne, we consider pyruvic acid peels as an alternative.

Actinic keratoses can be selectively treated with either TCA (30%) or pyruvic acid (50–60%). In melasma, pyruvic acid can be utilized in combination with 40% salicylic acid alone or with 30% salicylic acid + TCA 10% gel. Pyruvic acid peels can also be used in post-inflammatory hyperpigmentation and solar lentigines.

Salicylic acid

Salicylic acid is a naturally occurring substance found in the bark of the willow tree. In concentrations of 3–5%, it acts as a keratolytic agent and enhances the penetration of other peeling agents. It is also a well-documented comedolytic agent. Salicylic acid is one of the oldest peeling agents with first documented use by Unna, a German dermatologist. Salicylic acid is a flexible substance that can be formulated in many types of vehicles. In our experience, salicylic acid is the best peeling agent for acne and macular acne scars (Figure 13.2), hyperpigmentation, melasma, and rosacea. Side effects are rare even in darker skin types.

We consider salicylic acid peels as first line therapy in the treatment of post inflammatory hyperpigmentation and melasma. We initially utilize 25% salicylic acid. If results are not satisfactory, 25% salicylic acid + 10% TCA gel can be used. In darker skin, 20–30 % salicylic acid is our first choice. Rosacea is another important indication for salicylic acid peels. In the telangiectatic phase, salicylic acid can be used in concentrations of 15–30%.

In solar lentigos, a combination of 30 % salicylic acid + TCA 25 % can be utilized even though we prefer 25% TCA alone as first choice. In mild to moderate photoaging, 20–30% salicylic acid alone or 25% salicylic acid + 25% TCA gel are our third and fourth choices.

Trichloroacetic acid

Trichloroacetic acid (TCA), first described by Roberts in 1926, is an inorganic compound, which is present in crystalline form. For the purposes of chemical peeling, it is mixed in an aqueous solution with distilled water to create the desired concentration. The use of TCA as a peeling agent has a wide variety of applications.

The most common indications we use TCA peels to treat are solar lentigos and severe acne scars (Figure 13.3). TCA can also be combined with salicylic acid for treatment of solar lentigos. For the treatment of recalcitrant hyperpigmentation and melasma, TCA can be combined with salicylic acid or glycolic acid.

We also utilize TCA in the treatment of xanthelasma. In mild to moderate photoaging, when 50–70% glycolic acid is ineffective, TCA 50% is the best choice for an all-over medium-depth peel. We tend to avoid the use of higher concentration TCA in darker skintypes. It is important to stress sun protection in all patients after treatment to avoid postpeel hyperpigmentation.

Advanced Topics: Treatment Tips for Experienced Practitioners

In a recent study, we proposed an innovative method for the treatment of acne scars and chickenpox scars. If only a few isolated scars are present on a background on healthy skin, the best method is TCA CROSS (chemical reconstruction of skin scars). This method involves local serial applications of high concentration TCA (50% to skin scars with sharpened wooden applicators). The wooden end of cotton-tipped applicators can be sharpened to a dull point using number 10 blade to approximate the shape of the scar. No local anesthesia or sedation is needed to perform this technique. TCA is applied for a few seconds until white frosting is present in the scar. We then prescribe emollients for 7 days after, and high photoprotection. In our study, we repeated the procedure at 4-week intervals, and each patient received a total of three treatments. We opted to use a reduced concentration of TCA (50%) instead of 100% TCA which was first described in the study by Lee and colleagues. We demonstrated excellent cosmetic outcomes without significant adverse reactions. Of note, this precise technique can be used for focal chemical scar reconstruction without the prolonged downtime associated with classic full-face chemical resurfacing. Moreover, compared with other procedures, this technique can minimize or avoid the potential risks of scarring and dyspigmentation by sparing the adjacent normal skin and adnexal structures. The CROSS technique with 50% TCA is in our hands a very useful approach for the treatment of acne scars (Figure 13.4).

image

Figure 13.4 50% TCA repeated at 4-week intervals for 3 session treatment. The frosting gives the time of application.

Reproduced from Fabbrocini G, Cacciapuoti S, Fardella N et al 2008 CROSS technique: chimica reconstruction of skin scars method. Dermatologic Therapy, 21: S29–S32 (with permission)

Case Studies

Case study 1: a patient with acne scars successfully treated with 30% TCA peeling

The patient had acne scars (Fig 13.5A). He had been previously treated with 30% salicylic acid and 50% glycolic acid peels without improvement. We decided to perform three 30% TCA peels at 4 week intervals. Photoprotection with SPF total block was recommended and alpha hydroxyacids were prescribed for topical application 4 times a week. The patient experienced good results after the second peeling with only mild transient erythema lasting 48 hours. Emollients were applied after each peeling. No burns or desquamation were observed until the third peeling. The results showed improvement of acne scars of about 70% and the patient was very satisfied with this course of therapy (Fig. 13.5B). Profilometry performed before and after treatments to evaluate reduction of roughness and deepness of the scars showed a reduction of about 65% in selected areas.

Further Reading

Azzam OA, Leheta TM, Nagui NA. Different therapeutic modalities for treatment of melasma. Journal of Cosmetic Dermatology. 2009;8:275-281.

Clark E, Scerri L. Superficial and medium-depth chemical peels. Clinics in Dermatology. 2004;26:209-218.

Day DJ, Littler CM, Swift RW, Gottlieb S. The wrinkle severity rating scale: a validation study. American Journal of Clinical Dermatology. 2004;5:49-52.

Erbil H, Sezer E, Taştan B, et al. Efficacy and safety of serial glycolic acid peels and a topical regimen in the treatment of recalcitrant melasma. Journal of Dermatology. 2007;34:25-30.

Fabbrocini G, De Padova MP, Tosti A. Chemical peels: what’s new and what isn’t new but still works well. Facial Plastic Surgery. 2009;25:329-336.

Fischer TC, Perosino E, Poli F, et al. Chemical peels in aesthetic dermatology: an update 2009. Journal of the European Academy of Dermatology and Venereology. 2010;24:281-292.

Haygood LJ, Bennett JD, Brodell RT. Treatment of xanthelasma palpebrarum with bichloracetic acid. Dermatological Surgery. 1998;24:1027-1031.

Khunger N, Sarkar R, Jain RK. Tretinoin peels versus glycolic acid peels in the treatment of Melasma in dark-skinned patients. Dermatological Surgery. 2004;30:756-760.

Khunger N. Standard guidelines of care for chemical peels. http://www.ijdvl.com, 2008. (accessed March 2009)

Landau M. Chemical peels. Clinics in Dermatology. 2008;26:200-208.

Tosti A, Grimes PE, De Padova MP. Color atlas of chemical peels. Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer-Verlag; 2006.

Zakopoulou N, Kontochristopoulos G. Superficial chemical peels. Journal of Cosmetic Dermatology. 2006;5:246-253.