SPINAL TRAUMA

Published on 10/04/2015 by admin

Filed under Neurology

Last modified 22/04/2025

Print this page

rate 1 star rate 2 star rate 3 star rate 4 star rate 5 star
Your rating: none, Average: 0 (0 votes)

This article have been viewed 1842 times

CHAPTER 104 SPINAL TRAUMA

Spinal cord injury (SCI) is a devastating event for patients and their families, with many severe medical, social, and economic sequelae. Patients may be permanently disabled and may ultimately have a lifelong dependence on support services. The neurological dysfunction after traumatic SCI results from a “primary” mechanical insult, followed by a downstream cascade of “secondary” processes that disrupt normal cord anatomy and function. The primary insult is determined by the mechanism of injury, energy applied to the cord, level of SCI, and patient factors such as medical comorbid conditions and the preinjury space available to the cord. Secondary injury mechanisms include, but are not limited to, disruption of the microcirculation, loss of autoregulation, edema, ischemia, calcium toxicity, glutamate excitotoxicity, lipid peroxidation, and free radical activation.1

Greater understanding of the pathophysiology of the secondary cascade and effective early resuscitation measures have improved the outcomes for these patients. Treatment of SCI is aimed at preserving residual neurological function, avoiding secondary injury to the cord, and restoring spinal alignment and stability. Currently, there is also burgeoning activity in basic research aimed at repair and regeneration of the injured spinal cord. This may facilitate higher levels of independence and productivity and may markedly improve the quality of life for patients with SCI.2,3

DEFINITIONS

SCI can be categorized as incomplete paraplegia, complete paraplegia, incomplete tetraplegia, and complete tetraplegia. According to the classification of the American Spinal Injury Association,4 tetraplegia is the “impairment or loss of motor and/or sensory function in the cervical segments of the spinal cord.” Paraplegia refers to “impairment or loss of motor and/or sensory function in the thoracic, lumbar, or sacral segments of the spinal cord.”

SCI is deemed an incomplete injury when motor sensory function is preserved below the level of injury. Sparing of sensation in the perianal region may be the only sign of residual function. Sacral sparing may be demonstrated by preservation of some sensory perception in the perianal region and/or by voluntary contraction of the rectal sphincter.

The injury is deemed complete when all function, including rectal, motor, and sensory function, is lost. During the first few days after injury, this diagnosis cannot be made with certainty because of the possibility of spinal shock (described later). The dermatomes and myotomes caudal to the neurological levels that remain partially innervated are named the zone of partial preservation.

The neurological injury level is determined primarily by clinical examination and is defined as the most caudal spinal cord segment with normal sensory and motor function on both sides of the body. The sensory level refers to the most caudal spinal cord segment with normal sensory function. The motor level is defined similarly with regard to motor function as the lowest key muscle that has a grade of at least 3/5 (Table 104-1).

TABLE 104-1 Muscle Strength Grading

Score Clinical Finding
0 Total paralysis
1 Palpable or visible contraction
2 Full range of motion with gravity eliminated
3 Full range of motion against gravity
4 Full range of motion but less than normal strength
5 Normal strength
NT Not testable

The bony level of injury is that at which the vertebrae are damaged, which causes injury to the spinal cord. As spinal nerves enter the spinal canal through the vertebral foramina and ascend or descend inside the spinal canal before entering the spinal cord, there is frequently a discrepancy between the bony and neurological levels. This discrepancy becomes more pronounced the further caudal the injury is.

ANATOMY OF SPINAL CORD INJURY

Fractures of the spine are determined by the forces applied to the spinal column. Such forces include distraction and compression, flexion and extension, and combinations thereof. Fractures are also categorized by anatomical location: cervical, thoracic, and lumbar.

Cervical Injury

The cervical spine is the region most vulnerable to injury. These injuries can be classified as upper and lower cervical. Upper cervical injuries include those to the base of the skull, C1, and C2. Lower cervical injuries affect C3 to C7. Upper cervical spine injuries can be described as atlanto-occipital dislocation, C1 fractures, disruption of the transverse ligament of C1, C2 odontoid fractures, and traumatic C2 spondylosis fractures. Lower cervical spine injuries are generally classified into facet dislocations, compression fractures, burst fractures, and teardrop fractures.

Atlanto-Occipital Dislocation

This is caused by traumatic hyperflexion and extension, in which the ligamentous connections between the skull and C1 and C2 are disrupted (Fig. 104-1). Because of the highly unstable nature of this injury, these patients often either die of brainstem destruction and apnea or are profoundly neurologically impaired (ventilator dependent and tetraplegic). On occasion, a patient may survive if prompt resuscitation is available at the injury scene. This injury may be identified in up to 20% of patients with fatal cervical spine injuries and is a common cause of death in cases of shaken baby syndrome in which the infant died immediately after being shaken.

Fractures and Dislocations (C3 to C7)

Bony injury to the lower cervical area occurs in the form of compression fracture, burst fracture, or teardrop fracture. Compression fractures arise from a flexion injury, with no greater than 25% compression of the middle column and no injury to the posterior longitudinal ligament. Burst fractures are the result of compression and flexion. Teardrop fractures are caused by flexion with rotation and compression and are notably unstable injuries (Fig. 104-4).

Fractures of C3 are relatively infrequent because this vertebra is positioned between the more vulnerable axis and the more mobile C5 and C6 vertebrae. C5 is the most commonly fractured cervical vertebra in adults, whereas subluxation more often occurs at the level of C5 on C6. Common injury patterns at these levels are vertebral body fractures with or without subluxation; subluxation of the articular processes; and fractures of the laminae, spinous processes, pedicles, or lateral masses. In rare cases, ligamentous disruption occurs without fractures or facet dislocations. The incidence of neurological injury increases dramatically with facet dislocations. After unilateral facet dislocation, 80% of patients develop a neurological injury (of which approximately 30% are root injuries only, 40% incomplete SCIs, and 30% complete SCIs). In the presence of bilateral locked facets, the morbidity is much worse, with 16% incomplete and 84% complete SCIs.

The Thoracic Spine

The mobility of the thoracic spine is much more restricted than that of the cervical spine, because it has additional support from the rib cage. This region requires greater force to disrupt its integrity and thus has a much lower incidence of fractures (Fig. 104-5). However, because the thoracic canal is relatively narrow, a fracture dislocation here frequently results in a severe neurological deficit. Because thoracic spine fractures result from violent forces, they are associated with a high incidence of concomitant injuries, such as rib fractures, pneumothorax, hemothorax, pulmonary contusion, cardiac contusion, and sometimes aortic shearing injury.

Lumbar Spine

The Dennis classification also divides lumbar spine injuries into minor and major categories on the basis of radiographic criteria. Major injuries encompass compression fractures, burst fractures, flexion- and distraction-type injuries, and fracture dislocations. Minor injuries include transverse process fractures, articular process fractures, spinous process fractures, and pars interarticularis fractures.

Compression fractures usually result from failure of the anterior column with intact middle and posterior columns, frequently from an anterior flexion force accompanied by a posterior tensile force. These injuries are generally not associated with neurological deficit. With lumbar burst fractures, loss of height of the anterior and middle columns is characteristically shown on radiographs, with retropulsion of bone into the canal and widening of the interpedicle distance. These fractures are inherently unstable. Flexion and distraction injuries, frequently described as Chance fractures (Fig. 104-7), represent a failure of the middle and posterior columns in tension, with the anterior column acting like a hinge. Fracture dislocations are associated with failure of all three columns with a combination of forces, including flexion rotation, flexion distraction, or shearing. Because of their inherent instability these injuries are probably associated with a high incidence of severe SCI.

Because the spinal cord ends at the L1 vertebral level, the cord itself may not necessarily be injured in lumbar fractures. Instead, insult to the cauda equina may occur. The neurological deficit here is less severe than in injuries to the spinal cord itself.

HISTOLOGY OF SPINAL CORD INJURY

According to Belanger and Levi (2000) and Park and associates (2004), the histological changes in SCI can be categorized as immediate, acute, intermediate, and late phases.6,7

Acute Phase (Hours to 1 to 2 Days)

This phase is characterized by vascular alterations, edema, hemorrhage, inflammation, and neuronal and myelin changes. The edema may be vasogenic: that is, secondary to breakdown of the endothelium at the blood-brain barrier, which leads to leakage of plasma fluid into the extracellular space. Diminished blood flow to the injured region and pressure effects may in turn cause ischemic damage. Cytotoxic edema (intracellular swelling), occurring mostly in astrocytes, is observed from 3 hours to 3 days after injury. This is probably caused by factors such as glutamate, lactate, K+, nitric oxide, arachidonate, reactive oxygen species, and ammonia, levels of which are elevated in the extracellular space shortly after injury, altering the osmotic balance of the cells. Hemorrhage in the acute phase occurs in the gray matter after contusion injury. This is primarily a result of rupture of postcapillary venules or sulcal arterioles, either from mechanical disruption or from intravascular coagulation that leads to venous stasis and distension. The larger caliber vessels are usually spared.

The high metabolic requirements of neurons make the gray matter exquisitely sensitive to ischemic injury. This can be compounded by the loss of autoregulatory mechanisms that normally control the microvascular hemodynamics tightly within the spinal cord.

The early inflammatory response is a complex process involving vascular changes, including the disruption of the blood-brain barrier and the upregulation of endothelial cell adhesion molecules that allow the activation and extravasation of cells from the bloodstream (neutrophils, macrophages, lymphocytes) into the injured tissue. These cells also release a large number of soluble immune mediators (cytokines, chemokines) that consequently activate resident glial cells.1,3 A mild influx of neutrophils has been described as beginning within 1 day after SCI, with a peak at 2 days and a decrease by 3 days. This is in sharp contrast to other tissues, in which the neutrophilic influx is often marked. The neutrophilic response in the central nervous system (CNS) is likely to be neurotoxic in nature, because once these cells are activated and accumulated at the lesion site, they release potent free radicals that attack the integrity of the lipid bilayer of the cellular membrane. The extent of neutrophil infiltration has been associated with blood-brain barrier dysfunction and tissue damage. The neuronal and axonal changes in the acute phase include marked axonal swelling and ultimately fiber disconnection. Microscopically, this is marked by the formation of typical retraction balls. Myelin breakdown is another feature of the early period after SCI. This is initially characterized by swelling of the myelin sheaths, and ultimately by fragmentation of myelin and its phagocytosis by macrophages. Myelin loss generally occurs in association with axonal pathology. Oligodendrocytes are also exquisitely sensitive to SCI. Much of the injury to these cells appears to be necrotic, but oligodendrocyte apoptosis has also been documented both in experimental animals and in humans.

Excitotoxicity

In SCI, excitotoxicity has been demonstrated to be predominantly caused by glutamate, the most prevalent excitatory neurotransmitter in the CNS.6 Release and accumulation of glutamate occur rapidly after SCI, reaching toxic levels as early as 15 minutes after experimental injury. Glutamate activates N-methyl-D-aspartate (NMDA) receptors and thereby allows extracellular calcium (and sodium) to move down a massive concentration gradient into the cell. NMDA receptor activation may also trigger the release of calcium into the cytoplasmic compartment from intracellular stores. Elevated cytosolic and mitochondrial calcium concentrations can trigger a multitude of calcium-dependent processes that reduce energy available to the cell, potentially leading to apoptosis.

Intermediate Phase (Days to Weeks)

Microglia and astrocytes play important roles in this phase of SCI, leading to either beneficial or detrimental effects on the damaged tissue.

Late Phase (Weeks to Months/Years)

The later phases of SCI are characterized by wallerian degeneration, astroglial and mesenchymal scar formation, development of cysts/cavities and syrinx, and schwannosis.

SPINAL CORD SYNDROMES

Incomplete lesions may be classified into a number of neurologic syndromes that reflect the anatomical level of cord injury. Recognition of the type of lesion enables the clinician to gather information about the mechanism of injury and guides selection of appropriate treatment. The various syndromes also have different prognoses for recovery.8

MANAGEMENT OF SPINAL TRAUMA

Victims of high-speed motor vehicle accidents, persons ejected from a vehicle, and patients with falls from a height are at particularly high risk of SCI. However, because severe SCI can also result from a seemingly minor insult, all trauma patients should be presumed to have a SCI until proved otherwise.7,1113

Surgical Treatment

The short-term goal is to place the spinal cord and nerves in the optimal position for recovery. Strategies range from an external orthosis to surgical intervention. Factors such as mechanism of injury, degree of neurological deficit, level of injury, and fracture anatomy contribute to the selection of the preferred treatment for each individual patient.

The timing, choice of surgical approach and extent of surgery in the acute management of spinal trauma are controversial. The time from injury to surgery and the degree of initial SCI appear to be important prognostic factors, but various authors have presented conflicting arguments. Some suggest that neurological recovery in patients with progressive deficits is greater if patients are treated within 8 hours of injury. Others argue that early surgery may predispose seriously injured patients to intraoperative and postoperative respiratory distress, additional bleeding, and infection and may increase the risk of adverse outcomes.

Kossmann and colleagues (2004) recommended two-staged “damage control” approach for spine trauma.14 Relatively safe procedures, such as posterior internal stabilization of thoracic or lumbar fractures or temporary external fixation of cervical fractures in a halo thoracic brace, are performed early. Once the patient is medically stable, a second operation for reconstruction of the anterior column may be performed. This delay allows for general recovery of the patient and facilitates safer anesthesia. Eventually, the definitive surgery can be electively scheduled at a time when an experienced spine surgeon is available. This may enable use of new minimally invasive techniques that are now available for the reconstruction of the anterior column of the thoracic and lumbar spine (Fig. 104-9).15

Pharmacological Therapy

Most traumatic injuries to the spinal cord do not involve actual transection of the cord but rather entail damage of the fibers from contusive, compressive, or stretch injury. Often, portions of the ascending and descending tracts remain intact. Although it is not currently known how much of the spinal cord needs to remain intact to mediate meaningful neurological function, the observation of anatomical continuity of the spinal cord has led to the notion that pharmacological treatments, if applied early, may be able to interrupt the secondary cascade and thereby improve the survival of damaged tissue.1

Cell membrane (plasma and organelle) lipid peroxidation has been demonstrated to be a key mechanism in the secondary cascade. Post-traumatic glutamate release, activation of the arachidonic acid cascade, and production of prostaglandins result in vasoconstriction and microembolism. This leads to formation of oxygen free radicals, which cause lipid peroxidation, more often involving neurons and endothelium, thus directly impairing neuronal and axonal membrane function, with consequent microvascular damage and secondary ischemia.

Methylprednisolone

In experimental studies, the glucocorticoid methylprednisolone has been shown to reduce lipid peroxidation, lessen edema and inflammation, lower excitatory amino acid release, and inhibit tumor necrosis factor α expression and nuclear factor κB activation. The nonglucocorticoid 21-aminosteroid tirilazad has also been shown to have these antioxidant neuroprotective properties. Treatment with methylprednisolone quickly became the standard of care for acute SCI; clinical studies indicated that initiation of treatment within the first 3 hours is optimal. However, use of high-dose methylprednisolone is controversial. Some researchers argue that the risks associated with methylprednisolone, such as increased wound infection rates, pneumonia, and severe sepsis, outweigh what they believe are usually modest neurological benefits. Other researchers have criticized the interpretations and conclusions drawn from the National Acute Spinal Cord Injury Studies that supported administration of methylprednisolone. Currently, many centers administer methylprednisolone if it can be given within 8 hours of the injury. In addition to methylprednisolone and other steroids, there has also been interest in the tetracycline antibiotic minocycline and the immunosuppressants FK-506 and cyclosporine. In animal models of contusive SCI, preliminary results with minocycline suggest a promising reduction in apoptotic death at the injury site and improved locomotor function. Cyclosporine acts at the mitochondrial membrane to impede apoptosis and has been shown to promote tissue sparing and inhibit lipid peroxidation in models of brain injury and SCI. In experimental models, FK-506 has been shown to promote axonal regeneration within the CNS.

New Pharmacological Approaches

Transplantation Strategies

The isolation of embryonic stem cells from the inner cell mass at the blastocyst stage of development has revolutionized the field of biology. These cells can replicate indefinitely without aging, are pluripotent, and can easily be genetically manipulated. The ability to isolate a relatively pure population of stem cells, to maintain them in culture over multiple passages, and then to demonstrate that these cells can differentiate into neurons, astrocytes, and oligodendrocytes in vitro and in vivo represented a major breakthrough in the understanding of neural development. The possibility that stem cells could be used for neural regeneration and repair for replacement strategies has provided an impetus for intensive research. There is evidence that various neural stem cells and precursors have differing properties in terms of cytokine dependence and of antigen and receptor expression. Thus far, researchers have demonstrated that embryonic stem cell–derived oligodendrocytes can myelinate in the normal immature nervous system.

Transplantation of embryonic stem cells and more mature cells by use of fragments of peripheral nerve, fetal tissue, or Schwann cell bridges is often assessed in conjunction with the administration of neurotrophins, such as brain-derived neurotrophic factor or neurotrophin 3, which have been shown to promote the growth of regenerating axons from transplanted tissue into the injured spinal cord. However, to restore neurological function, replenishment of cells at the injury site with stem cells needs to be followed by successful differentiation and targeted formation of operational connections by the new fibers. The complexity of these multifactorial events makes successful transplantation a challenging task. Research in this area is being pursued.

The utility of embryonic stem cells for clinical therapy has, so far, also been limited by their propensity to form teratocarcinomas when transplanted as undifferentiated cells. It is hoped that further research into the molecular mechanisms regulating stem cell differentiation will allow the full capacity of endogenous and transplanted stem cells to be harnessed for clinical use.

CONCLUSION

Primary neurological injury at the time of spinal column trauma is mediated through dissipation of mechanical energy and is caused by compression, cord stress, tension, shear, or disruption. A secondary injury cascade is mediated through alteration in the biomechanical environment of the cord and/or ischemia. Proper treatment of patients sustaining spinal injuries involves a meticulously coordinated effort involving emergency response personnel, emergency department doctors, trauma and orthopedic surgeons, nurses, and rehabilitation physicians. Through improvements in medical and surgical care, patients who survive their initial injuries can now expect to live long lives. Burgeoning research into the mechanisms of secondary injury and greater attention given to preventative strategies and early resuscitation promise to facilitate further improvements in neurological outcomes in patients who sustain spinal injuries. This should enable higher levels of independence and productivity and thereby improve the outlook for these patients, most of whom are young and otherwise healthy.

KEY POINTS

References

1 Kwon BK, Tetzlaff W, Grauer JN, et al. Pathophysiology and pharmacologic treatment of acute spinal cord injury. Spine J. 2004;4:451-464.

2 Mohta M, Sethi AK, Tyagi A, et al. Psychological care in trauma patients. Injury. 2003;34:17-25.

3 Lee TT, Green BA. Advances in the management of acute spinal cord injury. Orthop Clin North Am. 2002;33:311-315.

4 Maynard FM, Bracken MB, Creasey G. International standard for neurological and functional classification of spinal cord injury. Spinal Cord. 1997;35:266-274.

5 Hsu JM, Joseph T, Ellis AM. Thoracolumbar fracture in blunt trauma patients: guidelines for diagnosis and imaging. Injury. 2003;34:426-433.

6 Park E, Velumian AA, Fehlings MG. The role of excitoxicity in secondary mechanisms of spinal cord injury: a review with an emphasis on the implications for white matter degeneration. J Neurotrauma. 2004;21:754-774.

7 Belanger E, Levi AD. The acute and chronic management of spinal cord injury. J Am Coll Surgeons. 2000;190:603-618.

8 Vale F, Burns J, Jackson AB, et al. Combined medical and surgical treatment after spinal cord injury: result of a prospective pilot study to assess the merits of aggressive medical resuscitation and blood pressure management. J Neurosurg. 1997;87:129-146.

9 Kothari P, Freeman B, Grevitt M, et al. Injury to the spinal cord without radiological abnormality (SCIWORA) in adults. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2000;82:1034-1037.

10 Pang D, Pollack I. Spinal cord injury without radiographic abnormality in children: the SCIWORA syndrome. J Trauma. 1989;29:654-664.

11 Guidelines for initial management and assessment of spinal injury. British Trauma Society. Injury. 2003;34:405-425.

12 Gilbert J. Critical care management of the patient with acute spinal cord injury. Crit Care Clin. 1987;3:549-567.

13 Patel RV, Delong WJr, Vresilovic EJ. Evaluation and treatment of spinal injuries in the patient with polytrauma. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2004;422:43-54.

14 Kossmann T, Trease L, Freedman I, et al. Damage control surgery for spine trauma. Injury. 2004;35:661-670.

15 Kossmann T, Jacobi D, Trentz O. The use of a retractor system (SynFrame) for open, minimal invasive reconstruction of the anterior column of the thoracic and lumbar spine. Eur Spine J. 2001;10:396-402.