Spinal Implant Attributes: Cantilever Beam Fixation

Published on 27/03/2015 by admin

Filed under Neurosurgery

Last modified 27/03/2015

Print this page

rate 1 star rate 2 star rate 3 star rate 4 star rate 5 star
Your rating: none, Average: 0 (0 votes)

This article have been viewed 3170 times

Chapter 138 Spinal Implant Attributes

Cantilever Beam Fixation

Cantilever

A cantilever beam is simply defined as a beam that is rigidly supported only at one end and carries a load. Examples of this commonly used engineering construct are numerous (Fig. 138-1). Spinal instrumentation constructs using cantilever beams are also common.1,2 It is important to recognize, however, that spinal instrumentation constructs are rarely composed of pure cantilever beams and may function otherwise in different clinical scenarios and when challenged with other stresses or moments.

An idealized cantilever beam is shown in Figure 138-2. A load applied to the beam is resisted by shear stress and a moment at the point of attachment to the support. In this idealized situation, with axial loading, the beam experiences a shear stress parallel to the z-axis (vertical) and a moment. This moment consists of a force and an instantaneous axis of rotation about which the force is applied.3

Cantilevers in Spinal Instrumentation

Cantilevers are frequently used in modern constrained spinal instrumentation. Figure 138-3 depicts a simple idealized short-segment nonsegmental spinal instrumentation construct. Such a construct has been termed cantilever beam fixation1,2 Brief analysis reveals the presence of four potential cantilevers. Each screw is a cantilever beam supported by the vertebral body support. Each rod is a cantilever beam supported by a screw support. Analysis of such a complex system requires either significant simplification or separate analysis of each component before considering the properties of the entire system.

With regard to spinal fixation points, all screws function as cantilevers in response to vertical shear forces and y-plane (sagittal) moments. As discussed subsequently, screws may not function as cantilevers in response to other forces and moments. Hooks never function as cantilevers because they are not rigidly attached to a support. Although able to resist a shear force in certain circumstances, they are unable to resist a moment. Likewise, cables do not function as cantilevers because they function only when attached at both ends. When attached at only one end, cables resist neither shear force nor moment.

With regard to the longitudinal elements of spinal instrumentation constructs, a screw-rod interface functions as a cantilever only when the screw is rigidly attached to the longitudinal element. Nonconstrained plate and screw interfaces do not function as cantilevers because they are not rigidly attached to a support and are limited in their ability to resist an applied moment. Likewise, many “dynamic” stabilization systems incorporate a screw-rod interface that is very limited in its ability to resist a bending moment.

Bone-Screw Cantilever

In the clinical situation, a transpedicular or vertebral body screw often functions as a cantilever. In this situation, the vertebral bone acts as the support. Both a shear stress and a rotational moment are resisted at the bone-screw interface.

Resistance to Bending Moment

Resistance to y-plane bending moment is more complex. An idealized diagram of a screw and vertebral body is depicted in Figure 138-5. The effect of differing material properties between the screw, cortical bone, and cancellous bone produces a complex interaction.

A refined definition of a cantilever is a load-bearing member, such as a beam, that projects beyond a fulcrum and is supported by a balancing member or a downward force behind the fulcrum. This definition applies more accurately to resistance to bending moment at the bone-screw interface below the threshold for cortical bone failure—its yield strength. Because of the difference in yield strength of the two types of bone, the cortical bone at the entrance to the vertebral body, particularly in the region of the pedicle, can be regarded as a fulcrum. The screw functions as the load-bearing beam. A load is applied to the head of the screw across the instantaneous axis of rotation at the cortical fulcrum, creating a moment. The magnitude of this moment varies in accordance with the formula: moment = force × distance (from the fulcrum). The resisting moment is generated by downward stress applied by the body of the screw behind the fulcrum. With only the short screw head protruding beyond the cortex, the applied moment may be quite low because the length of the level arm is minimal unless extended by connection to other implants.

Failure at the bone-screw interface occurs in response to a bending moment if the yield strength of either the fulcrum (cortical bone) or the downward force (cancellous bone) behind the fulcrum is exceeded.4 The yield strength for both regions is increased with increased contact area. This is a function of both screw diameter (cortical and cancellous) and screw length (relevant only for the cancellous portion). An increase in screw length increases contact area only in the cancellous region, whereas contact area is fixed for a given screw diameter and a given thickness of cortical bone at the entrance. In addition, longer screws increase resistance to a bending moment by increasing the distance between the cortical fulcrum and the distal tip of the screw, increasing the moment of the resistive force in the cancellous region.

In response to a bending moment, the mechanical properties of the screw shaft may also be relevant. The bending resistance of the screw is related to the area moment of inertia, determined primarily by the minor diameter of the screw. For a screw of circular cross section, elastic resistance to a bending moment is proportional to the fourth power of the minor diameter.5 The bending moment is least at the proximal and distal end of the screw and is inversely proportional to the distance from the fulcrum. The bending moment reaches its maximum at the point of the cortical fulcrum. The advantage of a larger-diameter screw lies not only in the increased contact area between the screw and the bone behind the fulcrum but also in the larger area moment of inertia. The use of a longer screw increases both the area of bone-screw contact and the length of the lever arm in cancellous bone behind the fulcrum, although this effect occurs at the expense of increasing bending moment at the screw entry point.

Screw-Rod Interface

Buy Membership for Neurosurgery Category to continue reading. Learn more here