Chapter 32 Sepsis, Severe Sepsis, and Septic Shock
2 Explain the nomenclature for disorders related to sepsis
Systemic inflammatory response syndrome (SIRS): characterized by
Sepsis: a suspected or documented source of infection plus two or more SIRS criteria.
Severe sepsis: sepsis with acute sepsis-induced organ dysfunction of one or more organ systems.
Septic shock: a subset of severe sepsis syndrome in which the organ dysfunction is cardiovascular, that is, a subset of severe sepsis in which there is cardiovascular dysfunction. Specifically, sepsis-induced hypotension (mean arterial pressure [MAP] < 65 mm Hg) that persists despite adequate and aggressive volume resuscitation. Patients will often require vasopressors to keep MAP ≥ 65 mm Hg.
Multiple organ dysfunction syndrome (MODS): Failure in more than one organ system that requires acute intervention. Once the patient reaches this degree of illness, the chances of making a meaningful recovery can often be quite low.
6 Which microorganisms are most commonly associated with sepsis?
Gram positive (65%): coagulase-negative staphylococci (36% of isolates), Staphylococcus aureus (17%), enterococci (10%).
Gram negative (25%):Escherichia coli (4%), Klebsiella sp. (4%), Pseudomonas aeruginosa (5%), Enterobacter sp. (5%), Serratia sp. (2%), Acinetobacter sp. (2%). Clinically, however, the problem of resistant gram-negative organisms in the ICU is rapidly becoming a serious one nationwide.
Fungi (9%): primarily Candida species (albicans 54%, glabrata 19%, parapsilosis 11%, tropicalis 11%).
8 What clinical signs and symptoms should raise suspicion of SIRS, sepsis, and underlying organ dysfunction?
Respiratory: cyanosis, tachypnea, orthopnea, increased sputum (yellow or green, frothy), hypoxemia (PaO2/FiO2 < 300), oxygen saturation < 90%.
Cardiovascular: need for vasopressors, chest pain, pulmonary edema, arrhythmias, cardiac index < 2.5, heart rate > 100 beats/min, decreased systemic vascular resistance, increased cardiac output.
Renal: urine output < 0.5 mL/kg/hr, increased blood urea nitrogen level, increased creatinine level, acute renal failure, acidosis, worsening base deficit.
Hepatic: elevated aspartate aminotransferase, alanine aminotransferase, or γ-glutamyl transferase levels; prolonged bleeding time; asterixis; encephalopathy; elevated bilirubin level. This is often referred to as ischemic hepatopathy or shock liver.
Immunologic: fever with temperature > 38° C or hypothermia, chills, leukocytosis with or without left shift, neutropenia.
Hematologic: weakness, pallor, poor capillary refill, easy bruising, spontaneous bleeding, anemia, increased prothrombin or partial thromboplastin time, decreased fibrinogen, disseminated intravascular coagulation (elevated D-dimer levels).
Gastrointestinal: anorexia, ileus, inability to tolerate tube feedings, nausea, vomiting, hypoalbuminemia.
Endocrine: hyperglycemia, hypoglycemia, adrenal insufficiency, weight loss.
Neurologic: weakness, confusion, delirium, psychoses, seizures.
9 What are the Surviving Sepsis Campaign Guidelines? What are some of the high points?
This document was originally published in 2004 and was codified by 11 international critical care organizations. It was updated in 2008. It provides a state-of-the-art evidence-based approach to the management of severe sepsis and septic shock. Some of the highlights of this important document are in Box 32-1.
Box 32-1 Highlights of the Surviving Sepsis Campaign Guidelines
10 What is an evidence-based approach to the use of the pulmonary artery catheter (PAC)?
1. Distinguish cardiogenic from noncardiogenic pulmonary edema
2. Determine which particular shock state (cardiogenic, distributive, hypovolemic) a patient may be in
3. Serve as a guide for therapeutic interventions for patients in shock
Key Points Sepsis, Severe Sepsis, and Septic Shock
1. Sepsis = Infection + Two or more SIRS criteria.
2. Severe sepsis = Sepsis plus acute organ dysfunction.
3. Heterogenous disease leads to difficulties with intervention trials.
4. Complex pathophysiology involves the immune system and coagulation homeostasis.
5. The Surviving Sepsis Campaign Guidelines provide a reasonable evidence-based approach to the current management of severe sepsis and septic shock.
1 Dellinger R.P., Carlet J.M., Masur H., et al. Surviving Sepsis Campaign: International guidelines for management of severe sepsis and septic shock: 2008. Crit Care Med. 2008;36:296–327.
2 Lagu T., Rothberg M.B., Shieh M.S., et al. Hospitalizations, costs, and outcomes of severe sepsis in the United States 2003 to 2007. Crit Care Med. 2012;40:754–761.
3 Levy M.M., Macias W.L., Vincent J.L., et al. Early changes in organ function predict eventual survival in severe sepsis. Crit Care Med. 2005;33:2194–2201.
4 Richard C., Warszawski J., Anguel N., et al. Early use of the pulmonary artery catheter and outcomes in patients with shock and acute respiratory distress syndrome: a randomized controlled trial. JAMA. 2003;290:2713–2720.
5 Sandham J.D., Hull R.D., Brant R.F., et al. A randomized, controlled trial of the use of pulmonary-artery catheters in high-risk surgical patients. N Engl J Med. 2003;348:5–14.
6 Wisplinghoff H., Bischoff T., Tallent S.M., et al. Nosocomial bloodstream infections in US hospitals: analysis of 24,179 cases from a prospective nationwide surveillance study. Clin Infect Dis. 2004;39:309–317.