Sedation and Delirium

Published on 10/03/2015 by admin

Filed under Critical Care Medicine

Last modified 22/04/2025

Print this page

rate 1 star rate 2 star rate 3 star rate 4 star rate 5 star
Your rating: none, Average: 0 (0 votes)

This article have been viewed 1684 times

Chapter 73 Sedation and Delirium

2 Why is it important to diagnose delirium?

The true prevalence and magnitude of delirium have been poorly documented because a myriad of terms, such as acute confusional state, intensive care unit (ICU) psychosis, acute brain dysfunction, and encephalopathy have been used historically to describe this condition. Although the overall prevalence of delirium in the community is only 1% to 2%, the prevalence increases with age, rising to 14% among those more than 85 years old. It may range from 14% to 24% with incidence rates up to 60% among general hospital populations, especially in older patients and those in nursing homes or post–acute care settings. In critically ill patients in the ICU (medical, surgical, trauma, and burn units) the reported prevalence of delirium is 20% to 80%, depending on the severity of illness, and may be closer to 80% in those who are receiving mechanical ventilation. In spite of this, the condition is often unrecognized by clinicians or the symptoms are incorrectly attributed to dementia or depression or considered an expected, inconsequential complication of critical illness. Numerous national and international surveys have shown a disconnect between the perceived importance of delirium, the accuracy of diagnosis, and the implementation of management and treatment techniques. Given that delirium is the most common organ dysfunction seen in critically ill patients and is associated with worse acute and long-term outcomes, it is important to diagnose and manage the disease by implementation of validated screening protocols.

6 Describe risk factors for delirium

Many risk factors for delirium exist, and these can be divided by host, acute illness, and iatrogenic and environmental factors (Table 73-1). Many of these factors are modifiable. Fortunately, several mnemonics can aid clinicians in recalling the list; two common ones are IWATCHDEATH and DELIRIUM (Table 73-2).

Table 73-1 Risk Factors for Delirium

Host factors Acute illness Iatrogenic or environmental
Age Sepsis Metabolic disturbances*
Baseline comorbidities Hypoxemia* Anticholinergic medications*
Baseline cognitive impairment Global severity of illness score Sedative and analgesic medications*
Genetic predisposition (?) Metabolic disturbances Sleep disturbances*

* Modifiable risk factors.

Table 73-2 Mnemonics for Risk Factors for Delirium

Iwatchdeath Delirium
Infection Drugs
Withdrawal Electrolyte and physiologic abnormalities
Acute metabolic Lack of drugs (withdrawal)
Trauma/pain Infection
Central nervous system pathology Reduced sensory input (blindness, deafness)
Hypoxia Intracranial problems (CVA, meningitis, seizure)
Deficiencies (vitamin B12, thiamine) Urinary retention and fecal impaction
Endocrinopathies (thyroid, adrenal) Myocardial problems (MI, arrhythmia, CHF)
Acute vascular (hypertension, shock)  
Toxins/drugs  
Heavy metals  

CHF, Congestive heart failure; CVA, cerebrovascular accident; MI, myocardial infarction.

14 How is delirium treated?

Once delirium is noted, an underlying cause should be ruled out before attempting pharmacologic intervention. Once life-threatening causes are ruled out, focus should be on the following:

To improve patient outcome, an evidence-based organizational approach referred to as the ABCDE bundle (Awakening and Breathing trials, Choice of appropriate sedation, Delirium monitoring, and Early mobility and exercise) is presented.

image Awaken the patient daily: Studies have shown that protocolized target-based sedation and daily spontaneous awakening trials reduce the number of days of mechanical ventilation. This strategy also exposes the patient to smaller cumulative doses of sedatives.

image Spontaneous breathing trials: This involves daily interruption of mechanical ventilation. Spontaneous breathing trials were shown to be superior to other varied approaches to ventilator weaning. Thus incorporation of spontaneous breathing trials into practice reduced the total time of mechanical ventilation.

image Choosing the right sedative regimen in critically ill patients: Numerous studies have identified that benzodiazepines are associated with worse clinical outcomes. The Maximizing Efficacy of Targeted Sedation and Reducing Neurological Dysfunction (MENDS) study showed more days alive without delirium or coma (7.0 vs. 3.0 days; P = 0.01), with a lower risk for delirium developing on subsequent days if the patient is taking dexmedetomidine compared with lorazepam. The Safety and Efficacy of Dexmedetomidine Compared with Midazolam (SEDCOM) study also showed a decrease in delirium prevalence in the dexmedetomidine group (54% vs. 76.6% [95% confidence interval, 14% to 33%]; P < 0.001) compared with midazolam, with those with shorter times receiving mechanical ventilation.

image Delirium management: The SCCM has published guidelines recommending routine monitoring for delirium in all ICU patients. Pharmacologic therapy for delirium should be attempted only after correcting any contributing factors or underlying physiologic abnormalities.

image Exercise and early mobility: Morris et al. showed that initiating physical therapy early during the patient’s ICU stay was associated with decreased length of stay both in the ICU and in the hospital. Schweickert et al. found that patients who underwent early mobilization had a significant improvement in functional status at hospital discharge. These patients also had a significant decrease in the duration of delirium (50%) in the ICU, as well as during the hospital stay.

15 Describe the pharmacologic management of delirium

Patients who manifest delirium should be treated with a traditional antipsychotic medication (haloperidol) per the SCCM guidelines. Newer atypical antipsychotic agents (e.g., risperidone, ziprasidone, quetiapine, or olanzapine) also may prove helpful for the treatment of delirium. Although the Modifying the Incidence of Delirium (MIND) study showed no difference in the duration of delirium between haloperidol, ziprasidone, or placebo when used for prophylaxis and treatment, a smaller study done by Devlin et al. showed that quetiapine was more effective than placebo in resolution of delirium when supplementing ongoing haloperidol therapy. Data from the MENDS study and the SEDCOM trial support the view that dexmedetomidine can decrease the duration and prevalence of delirium when compared with lorazepam or midazolam. Benzodiazepines remain the drugs of choice for the treatment of delirium tremens (and other withdrawal syndromes) and seizures (Table 73-3).

Table 73-3 Pharmacologic Treatment of Delirium in Hospitalized Patients

Class and drug Dose
Antipsychotic
Haloperidol 0.5-1 mg PO twice daily*, with additional doses every 4 hr as needed up to a maximum of 20 mg daily
  0.5-1 mg IM; observe after 30-60 min and repeat if needed
Atypical antipsychotics
Risperidone 0.25-1 mg/day up to a maximum of 6 mg/day
Olanzapine 2.5-10 mg once or twice daily
Quetiapine 25-50 mg PO once or twice daily
Ziprasidone 20-40 mg PO once or twice daily
Benzodiazepine
Lorazepam 0.5-1 mg PO, with additional doses every 4 hr as needed; reserve for use in alcohol withdrawal, Parkinson disease, and neuroleptic malignant syndrome
Antidepressant
Trazodone 25-150 mg PO at bedtime

IM, Intramuscular; PO, orally.

*Note: See text for more rapid effects with IV/IM dosing.

18 How are second-generation antipsychotic agents used in delirium?

Newer atypical antipsychotic agents (e.g., risperidone, ziprasidone, quetiapine, and olanzapine) may also prove helpful for delirium. The advantage over haloperidol is theoretic and may be related to its effect not only on dopamine but also on other neurotransmitters such as serotonin, acetylcholine, and norepinephrine. Studies need to be repeated with larger patient populations before any concrete recommendations can be made regarding the efficacy of typical or atypical antipsychotics in delirium.

Bibliography

1 American Psychiatric Association. Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders, 4th ed. Washington, D.C: American Psychiatric Association; 2000.

2 Banerjee A., Pandharipande P. Delirium. In: Bope E.T., Rakel R.E., Kellerman R.D. Conn’s Current Therapy 2010. Philadelphia: Saunders; 2010:1117.

3 Devlin J.W., Roberts R.J., Fong J.J., et al. Efficacy and safety of quetiapine in critically ill patients with delirium: a prospective, multicenter, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled pilot study. Crit Care Med. 2010;38:419–427.

4 Ely E., Shintani A., Truman B., et al. Delirium as a predictor of mortality in mechanically ventilated patients in the intensive care unit. JAMA. 2004;291:1753–1762.

5 Ely E.W., Inouwe S.K., Bernard G.R., et al. Delirium in mechanically ventilated patients: validity and reliability of the confusion assessment method for the intensive care unit (CAM-ICU). JAMA. 2001;286:2703–2710.

6 Girard T.D., Jackson J.C., Pandharipande P., et al. Delirium as a predictor of long-term cognitive impairment in survivors of critical illness. Crit Care Med. 2010;38:1513–1520.

7 Girard T.D., Kress J.P., Fuchs B.D., et al. Efficacy and safety of a paired sedation and ventilator weaning protocol for mechanically ventilated patients in intensive care (Awakening and Breathing Controlled trial): a randomised controlled trial. Lancet. 2008;371:126–134.

8 Girard T.D., Pandharipande P., Ely E. Delirium in the intensive care unit. Crit Care. 2008;12(Suppl 3):S3.

9 Gunther M., Morandi A., Ely E. Pathophysiology of delirium in the intensive care unit. Crit Care Clin. 2008;24:45–65.

10 Marcantonio E.R., Juarez G., Goldman L., et al. The relationship of postoperative delirium with psychoactive medications. JAMA. 1994;272:1518–1522.

11 Morris P.E., Goad A., Thompson C., et al. Early intensive care unit mobility therapy in the treatment of acute respiratory failure. Crit Care Med. 2008;36:2238–2243.

12 Pandharipande P., Cotton B.A., Shintani A., et al. Motoric subtypes of delirium in mechanically ventilated surgical and trauma intensive care unit patients. Intensive Care Med. 2007;33:1726–1731.

13 Pandharipande P., Cotton B.A., Shintani A., et al. Prevalence and risk factors for development of delirium in surgical and trauma intensive care unit patients. J Trauma. 2008;65:34–41.

14 Pandharipande P., Morandi A., Adams J.R., et al. Plasma tryptophan and tyrosine levels are independent risk factors for delirium in critically ill patients. Intensive Care Med. 2009;35:1886–1892.

15 Pandharipande P., Pun B.T., Herr D.L., et al. Effect of sedation with dexmedetomidine vs lorazepam on acute brain dysfunction in mechanically ventilated patients: the MENDS randomized controlled trial. JAMA. 2007;298:2644–2653.

16 Pandharipande P., Sanders R.D., Girard T.D., et al. Effect of dexmedetomidine versus lorazepam on outcome in patients with sepsis: an a priori–designed analysis of the MENDS randomized controlled trial. Crit Care. 2010;14:R38.

17 Pandharipande P., Shintani A., Peterson J., et al. Lorazepam is an independent risk factor for transitioning to delirium in intensive care unit patients. Anesthesiology. 2006;104:21–26.

18 Riker R., Shehabi Y., Bokesch P.M., et al. Dexmedetomidine vs midazolam for sedation of critically ill patients: a randomized trial. JAMA. 2009;301:489–499.

19 Schweickert W., Pohlman M.C., Pohlman A.S., et al. Early physical and occupational therapy in mechanically ventilated, critically ill patients: a randomised controlled trial. Lancet. 2009;373:1874–1882.