Sedation, Analgesia, and Related Topics

Published on 13/02/2015 by admin

Filed under Cardiothoracic Surgery

Last modified 22/04/2025

Print this page

rate 1 star rate 2 star rate 3 star rate 4 star rate 5 star
Your rating: none, Average: 2 (2 votes)

This article have been viewed 2334 times

Chapter 4 Sedation, Analgesia, and Related Topics

In this chapter the indications, contraindications, and adverse effects of drugs used for sedation and analgesia in the intensive care unit (ICU) are reviewed. In addition, practical tools for the measurement of depth of sedation and quality of analgesia are outlined. The related topics of neuromuscular-blocking drugs and antiemetics are also discussed.

PHARMACOKINETIC CONSIDERATIONS

The term pharmacokinetics refers to the handling of a drug by the body and includes the distribution and elimination of a drug. The term pharmacodynamics refers to the effect of a drug on the body and includes the concepts of efficacy, adverse effects, and potency described under the subsequent heading Analgesic Drugs.

Duration of Effect

The elimination half-time is the time taken for the amount of drug in the body to decrease by 50%. This parameter is often quoted when describing the pharmacokinetic properties of a drug. However, elimination half-time only rarely reflects the duration of effect. When a drug is given intravenously, it is rapidly distributed to a central “virtual” compartment consisting of plasma, interstitial fluid, and organs with high blood flow (brain, heart, liver, kidneys). This central compartment is in equilibrium with the effect site and with the organs of elimination—the liver and the kidneys. Drugs with low lipid solubility, high ionization, and high protein binding tend to be confined to this central compartment and typically have a small steady-state volume of distribution (VSS; Fig. 4-1). Such drugs can be described using a one-compartment model (V1). For drugs that obey one-compartment kinetics, the duration of effect may be related to the elimination half-time. Examples include aminoglycosides and neuromuscular blocking drugs. However, highly lipid-soluble drugs, including most sedative-hypnotics and opioid analgesics, display multicompartment kinetics in which drugs are redistributed from the central compartment to one or two peripheral compartments (V2, V3; see Fig. 4-1).

image

Figure 4.1 Pharmacokinetic models. The top panel shows one- and three-compartment models. With a one-compartment model, drug is delivered to the central compartment, which has an apparent volume of distribution (V). Drug is eliminated from the body by the liver and the kidneys (or plasma enzymes). The clearance of a drug (CL) is the volume of plasma from which the drug is completely eliminated per unit time; it is usually reported in ml/min. For a one-compartment model, the volume of distribution and the clearance of the drug determine the elimination half-time (T1/2elim):T1/2elim = Ln(2)V/CL, where Ln(2) is the natural logarithm of 2(0.692). For drugs that obey one-compartment kinetics, the elimination half-time is an important determinant of the duration of effect of the drug. The central compartment is in equilibrium with the effect-site compartment (Ve). Keo is the rate constant for equilibrium between the central compartment and the effect site. The time taken for the effect-site concentration to increase to half the central compartment concentration is the effect-site half-time (T1/2keo); it is related to Keo as T1/2keo = Ln(2)/Keo. Effect-site half-time is an important determinant of the speed of onset of a drug.

For a three-compartment model, drug equilibrates between the central compartment (V1) and two peripheral compartments (V2 and V3). The steady-state volume of distribution (VSS) is given by: VSS = V1 + V2 + V3. Rate constants and distribution half-times between the central and peripheral compartments can be calculated. The bottom panel shows plasma-concentration-time curves for a drug that displays three-compartment kinetics. Following a single intravenous (IV) dose (curve A), the concentration initially falls very rapidly due to redistribution from the central compartment; the clinical effect is relatively short. Following multiple intravenous bolus doses (curve B), or prolonged infusion (curve C), the peripheral compartments become progressively saturated with drug. With each dose, the rate of decline of the plasma concentration decreases until the peripheral compartments are fully saturated. Once drug administration ceases, the plasma concentration slowly falls, and the clinical effect is prolonged.

In a three-compartment model, the drug is delivered to the central compartment and then distributed to two peripheral compartments: the second compartment is composed of tissues with intermediate blood flow (e.g., muscle); and the third compartment is composed of tissues with low blood flow, principally fat. For highly lipid-soluble drugs, this third compartment can provide a huge reservoir into which drug molecules slowly equilibrate. For example, the VSS of propofol, a highly lipid-soluble drug, is more than 400 l, a volume much greater than the volume of a human being, implying that the drug is concentrated in the lipid-rich V3. This compares with a VSS of just 15 l for pancuronium, a poorly lipidsoluble drug that is confined mainly to the extracellular fluid. The offset of highly lipid-soluble drugs, such as fentanyl, midazolam, and propofol, is not due to their elimination from the body but to redistribution from the central compartment to peripheral compartments. However, following prolonged infusion, the peripheral compartment can become saturated with a drug. Once the infusion has stopped, as the concentration in the central compartment falls due to hepatic metabolism, the drug moves back into the central compartment from the peripheral compartments, prolonging the clinical effect.

For drugs that display multicompartment kinetics, distribution and context-sensitive half-times are more useful concepts than elimination half-time. The distribution half-time is the time taken for the concentration within the central compartment to fall by 50%. Following a single intravenous dose, the distribution half-time determines the duration of effect of the drug (see Fig. 4-1). The context-sensitive half-time is the time taken for the effect-site concentration to fall by 50% following discontinuation of an intravenous infusion.1 Because a drug accumulates in the peripheral compartments over time, the context-sensitive half-time changes depending on the duration of infusion (Fig. 4-2). The context-sensitive half-time provides some indication of the duration of effect of the drug following both short- and long-term infusions (or repeated bolus doses). The percentage of decrease in concentration required for recovery from a drug’s effect is not necessarily 50%.

Highly lipid-soluble drugs typically undergo extensive hepatic metabolism to produce water-soluble metabolites that are then excreted by the kidney. For a number of sedative and analgesic drugs, these metabolites are pharmacologically active and can prolong the clinical effect, particularly in the presence of renal dysfunction.

Multicompartment kinetics, prolonged infusion, the presence of active metabolites, and concomitant hepatic and renal dysfunction collectively explain why the duration of effect of many sedative and analgesic medications is greatly prolonged in critically ill patients.

Onset of Action

The speed of onset of a drug depends on multiple factors; two that are of clinical importance for intravenously administered sedatives and analgesics are (1) the speed with which the drug is distributed within the central compartment and (2) the half-time for equilibration between the central and effect-site compartments (T1/2keo; see Fig. 4-1). Low cardiac output slows drug distribution within the central compartment and can greatly prolong the onset time. Thus, when administering potent sedative or analgesic medications to patients with low cardiac output, it is essential to give a small initial dose and wait a longer than normal time for the clinical effect to occur. Values for T1/2keo vary among drugs. For instance, the T1/2keo for morphine, fentanyl, and remifentanil are 17 minutes, 6.6 minutes, and 1.16 minutes, respectively. Therefore, morphine will have a slower onset of action than fentanyl and remifentanil.

SEDATION

Sedation is part of a continuum of central nervous system (CNS) depression that ranges from anxiolysis through sedation, hypnosis (sleep), unconsciousness, and coma. Most sedative-hypnotic drugs produce anxiolysis at subhypnotic doses. Certain drugs, notably the benzodiazepines, also produce antegrade (i.e., following drug administration) amnesia at low doses. Some sedativehypnotics are anticonvulsants (e.g., benzodiazepines, barbiturates, and propofol). Anxiolysis is not the same as sedation. Antipsychotic drugs produce a state of outward calm but can increase feelings of anxiety and apprehension.

Indications for Sedation

Ventilated patients require sedation to tolerate endotracheal intubation and mechanical ventilation, facilitate nursing care, minimize the stress response, reduce oxygen consumption, diminish recall of unpleasant experiences, and prevent the development of posttraumatic stress disorder.2,3 Less commonly, sedation is indicated in extubated patients for the treatment of anxiety or delirium.

Mechanical ventilation, particularly using lungprotective strategies with long inspiratory times and permissive hypercapnia, is poorly tolerated by nonsedated patients and can result in ventilator dysynchrony (Chapter 29) and the sensation of dyspnea. Distressed patients may become tachycardic and hypertensive, which can exacerbate or provoke myocardial ischemia and bleeding. Such patients may also self-extubate or pull out their intravascular lines and surgical drains. A critically unwell patient commonly benefits from deep sedation, occasionally accompanied by neuromuscular blockade, during the acute phase of an illness. However, most patients do not require paralysis, only a level of sedation sufficient to allow tolerance of endotracheal intubation. Sedation of agitated patients should be commenced only after providing adequate analgesia and treating reversible physiologic causes.3

Adverse Effects of Sedation

Excessive sedation contributes to hypotension and delays awakening, needlessly prolonging the duration of mechanical ventilation.4 Sedation may also mask the development of intracranial, intrathoracic, or intraabdominal complications. The reduction in sympathetic tone that follows the administration of sedative and analgesic drugs can cause important hypotension. Hypotension is particularly marked in patients with high levels of endogenous catecholamines such as those that occur in the settings of hypovolemia and acute heart failure. Following prolonged administration of some sedatives (and opioid analgesics), tolerance may develop such that increased doses are required to elicit the same clinical effect. Abrupt discontinuation of certain sedatives, notably benzodiazepines, in a patient who has developed tolerance, may provoke a withdrawal syndrome (see discussion under subsequent heading Benzodiazepines). For these reasons, the need for sedation should be evaluated on an on-going basis and the depth of sedation regularly assessed.

Assessment of Sedation

If the clinical state allows, sedation should be stopped each day until the patient shows signs of awakening. Sedation can then be restarted if still indicated. A number of sedation scoring systems have been developed to quantify the depth of sedation and allow sedative drugs to be titrated to effect. Some commonly used scoring systems are shown in Table 4-1. Although primarily a system for monitoring neurologic function after trauma, the Glasgow Coma Scale (Table 4-2) may also be used to monitor sedation, although much information is lost in patients who are intubated and cannot respond verbally. One option in ventilated patients is to revise the Glasgow Coma Scale score to a maximum of 10, with the annotation that the patient is intubated.

Table 4-2 Glasgow Coma Scale

Verbal Response Motor Response Eye Response
5 = Appropriate 6 = Obeys commands 4 = Opens spontaneously
4 = Disorientated 5 = Localizes to pain 3 = Opens on command
3 = Unconnected words 4 = Withdraws from pain 2 = Opens with pain
2 = Sounds only 3 = Abnormal flexion to pain 1 = No response
1 = Nothing 2 = Extends to pain  
  1 = No response Total = V + M + E = 3-15

The Bispectral Index (BIS) monitor, a highly processed electroencephalogram, is widely used to assess depth of anesthesia during surgery and has been used on a limited basis to monitor depth of sedation in the ICU.5,6 A potential problem with this monitor in the ICU environment is that BIS recordings are increased—implying a reduced depth of sedation—by electromyographic activity.7 Thus, BIS recordings tend to be lower in paralyzed patients than in nonparalyzed patients for an equivalent depth of sedation. This phenomenon could potentially lead to paralyzed patients receiving inadequate sedation, resulting in unpleasant awareness.

Sedative Drugs

The ideal sedative agent would have a rapid onset and offset of action (i.e., a short and constant context-sensitive half-time); cause minimal respiratory and cardiovascular depression; and be inexpensive. No single agent fulfills all three criteria.

Propofol

Propofol is a hypnotic anesthetic agent that is administered intravenously by bolus or continuous infusion. At low doses, propofol causes amnesia and anxiolysis; at higher doses, general anesthesia. The mechanism of action of propofol is probably the enhancement of GABA (γ-aminobutyric acid) channel activity (see later discussion).

Propofol is a highly lipid-soluble drug that is formulated as a lipid emulsion. The solution supports bacterial growth and should be prepared using aseptic technique. Infusion lines and/or propofol bottles should be changed every 12 to 24 hours.

The onset of action following a bolus dose usually occurs within 30 seconds. Propofol has a distribution half-time of 2 to 4 minutes, which results in an offset of effect of 5 to 10 minutes following a bolus dose. There is minimal residual sedation. Propofol has a relatively stable context-sensitive half-time (see Fig. 4-2), and awakening is rapid even after prolonged infusion. In one study of cardiac surgery patients, extubation occurred after a mean time of 7.6 minutes after cessation of propofol infusion (mean dose of 82.8 mg/hr) following 17 hours of continuous sedation.8 The corresponding extubation time for patients given midazolam (mean dose 2.3 mg/hr) was 125 minutes. This rapid offset of clinical effect following prolonged infusion occurs because propofol has high hepatic and extrahepatic clearance (pharmacokinetic effect) and because subhypnotic concentrations of propofol cause minimal sedation (pharmacodynamic effect).

The dose range for sedation in the ICU is 0.3 to 3 mg/kg/hr. There is large interpatient variability in the required dose; higher doses are required in the young (because of increased clearance) and in those habituated to other sedative-hypnotics such as alcohol. As a bolus (0.5 to 3 mg/kg), propofol can be used to induce general anesthesia.

The main side effects of propofol relate to cardiac and respiratory depression. Hypotension due to vasodilation tends to be more marked than with other sedatives. Bolus doses must be used with extreme caution because as little as 20 mg can cause profound hypotension in critically unwell patients. Respiratory depression and apnea are also common, particularly following bolus doses. In extubated patients, equipment for bag-mask ventilation and endotracheal intubation should be immediately available. Doses in excess of 5 mg/kg/hr for prolonged periods have been associated with propofol infusion syndrome. This syndrome is characterized by metabolic acidosis and progressive hemodynamic collapse, and it is potentially fatal.9 Prolonged infusions may result in hyperlipidemia resulting from the intralipid emulsion.

Propofol is a very useful agent for short-term sedation following cardiac surgery. Once patients have been fully rewarmed and bleeding has settled, propofol can be discontinued in the expectation of rapid awakening.

Midazolam

Midazolam can be given enterally or parenterally and has an oral bioavailability of about 50%. For sedation in the ICU, midazolam is given by intermittent intravenous bolus or by continuous infusion. The usual dose range is 2 to 10 mg/hr, but much higher doses are occasionally required. Following a single intravenous dose, midazolam has a rapid onset of action and a short duration of effect. The distribution half-time is about 8 minutes. Bolus doses should be administered slowly (1 mg/min) and titrated to effect because the peak effect may be delayed for several minutes in patients with low cardiac output. Following prolonged infusion the context-sensitive half-time is increased (see Fig. 4-2), which results in a greatly prolonged duration of effect.

Midazolam undergoes hepatic metabolism by hydroxylation—by the cytochrome P-450 (CYP) 3A4 enzyme system—and conjugation. The 1-hydroxy metabolite is pharmacologically active and can contribute to the clinical effect. Drugs that inhibit the CYP3A4 enzyme system (Table 4-3) can prolong the effect of midazolam.

Table 4-3 Selected Substrates, Inhibitors, and Inducers of the CYP3A4 and 2D6 Hepatic Enzyme Systems

CYP3A4
Substrates Inhibitors Inducers
Calcium channel blockers Antiarrhythmics Rifamycins
Diltiazem Amiodarone Rifabutin
Felodipine Calcium channel blockers Rifampin
Verapamil Diltiazem Rifapentine
Benzodiazepines Verapamil Anticonvulsants
Midazolam Nicardipine Carbamazepine
Alprazolam Azole antifungals Phenobarbital
Immunosuppressives Itraconazole Phenytoin
Cyclosporine Ketoconazole Others
Tacrolimus Voriconazole St.
Sirolimus Macrolide antibiotics Anti-HIV agents
Statins Erythromycin  
Atorvastatin Clarithromycin  
Lovastatin Troleandomycin  
Macrolide antibiotics Others  
Erythromycin Grapefruit juice  
Clarithromycin Anti-HIV agents  
Others Metoclopramide  
Losartan    
Sildenafil    
Anti-HIV agents    
  CYP2D6  
Substrates Inhibitors  
β blockers Antidepressants and antipsychotics  
Alprenolol Chlorpromazine  
Bufuralol Haloperidol  
Carvedilol Fluoxetine  
Metoprolol Paroxetine  
Propranolol Clomipramine  
Timolol Doxepin  
Antiarrhythmics Antiarrhythmics  
Flecainide Quinidine  
Mexiletine Amiodarone  
Propafenone Antihistamines  
Antipsychotics H2 antagonists (ranitidine)  
Haloperidol H1 receptor antagonists  
Antidepressants    
Fluoxetine    
Paroxetine    
Venlafaxine    
Some tricyclic antidepressants    
Opioids    
Codeine    
Dextromethorphan    
Tramadol    

Substrate drugs’metabolisms or inhibitors of the relevant enzyme system. Two are enhanced or inhibited other important CYPenzyme systems are 2C9, which is involved in the metabolism of warfarin, and 2C19, which is involved in the metabolism of the proton pump inhibitors (omeprazole, pantoprazole, etc.)

(Modified from Wilkinson GR: Drug metabolism and variability among patients in drug response. N Engl J Med 352:2211, 2005.)48 HIV, human immunodeficiency virus.

Hypotension is less marked than with propofol but can still occur. Apnea and airway obstruction are common, particularly when midazolam is combined with an opioid. Midazolam is a useful sedative agent in patients who are hemodynamically unstable or require prolonged ventilation.

ANTIPSYCHOTIC DRUGS

In the ICU, antipsychotic drugs are indicated for the management of acute delirium. They help to reduce agitation and aggression and have some sedative effects. Patients appear detached and calm. However, antipsychotics are not indicated for the treatment of anxiety and do not provide amnesia.

Antipsychotics

Risperidone

Risperidone is an atypical antipsychotic that is used mainly to treat psychotic disorders such as schizophrenia. However, evidence of its effectiveness in treating acute delirium is emerging.13 Risperidone is generally not available for parenteral use so is not useful for the acute control of aggressive patients. The starting dose is 0.25 to 0.5 mg twice daily, which may be increased to a maximum of 8 mg per day.13 Extrapyramidal side effects are fewer than with haloperidol but can occur. Risperidone is not associated with torsades de pointes ventricular tachycardia.11

ANALGESIC DRUGS

Pain following cardiac surgery arises from the sternotomy incision, from pleural irritation caused by chest drains, from osteoarticular trauma caused by retraction of the thoracic cage, and from sites from which bypass conduits have been obtained (saphenous vein, radial artery). Occult rib fractures are also common. In one study, 44 rib fractures were identified on radionuclide bone scans following median sternotomy in 24 patients.14 Pain is maximal on the first and second postoperative days, with the greatest intensity in the sternal, substernal, and parasternal regions.15 Pain scores are significantly higher in younger patients (<60 years) than in older patients.15 Severe pain also limits deep breathing and forceful coughing, which contributes to sputum retention and atelectasis and increases the risk for pneumonia. Some investigators have shown a reduction in postoperative pain16 and improved pulmonary function17 with the use of minimally invasive surgical techniques rather than conventional midline sternotomy. However, these benefits have not been consistent findings.18,19 Postoperative pain varies dramatically from patient to patient and also changes over time. Thus, analgesic regimes must be individualized and drug therapy titrated to effect.

Analgesic Regimens

Most patients benefit from a multimodal analgesic regimen consisting of an opioid in combination with acetaminophen. In selected patients, a nonsteroidal antiinflammatory drug (NSAID) or tramadol is a useful adjunct.

While patients are sedated and intubated, an opioid is administered intravenously, usually by intermittent bolus and on the basis of the patient’s physiologic and behavioral responses. Once the patient is awake and extubated, intravenous opioid analgesia may be administered via a patient controlled analgesia (PCA) system (Table 4-4). PCA provides enhanced analgesia and increased patient satisfaction, and it may improve pulmonary function over that found with the use of conventional intravenous opioid techniques.22,23 An alternative to PCA, once patients are able to take medications enterally, is the combination of a long- and a short-acting oral opioid (Table 4-5). The long-acting agent is taken morning and night for 2 to 3 days following surgery; the short-acting agent is taken for breakthrough pain or prior to planned activities such as physical therapy. A full agonist should not be combined with a weak agonist (see Strong and Weak Opioids in subsequent material). After the first few days following surgery, acetaminophen, either alone or in combination with a weak opioid, usually provides adequate analgesia. A simple measure that helps with pain following sternotomy is the use of a rolled towel or small pillow that the patient can clutch over the wound during repositioning and coughing.

In some centers, regional analgesia (Chapter 12), often involving epidural or intrathecal opioids, is used for the management of pain following cardiac surgery. The advantages of regional analgesia include improved postoperative pain relief and the potential for earlier extubation.24,25 Countered against this is the fact that for most patients the pain following sternotomy is of moderate, rather than severe, intensity15 and is typically less than the pain experienced following a lateral thoracotomy or upper abdominal incision. Furthermore, despite the good safety record noted in reported series, many clinicians are concerned about the potential for the formation of epidural hematoma in patients in whom the epidural space has been instrumented and who then receive heparin shortly thereafter.

Analgesics: Opioids

Strong and Weak Opioids: Efficacy Versus Potency

Opioids function as competitive agonists, partial agonists, or antagonists at opioid receptors within the CNS. There are three basic types of opioid receptors—mu (μ), kappa (κ), and sigma (δ)—but the therapeutic and adverse effects of opioid drugs result mainly from their effect on μ receptors.

Efficacy describes the maximum clinical effect of a drug; potency describes the plasma concentration, and therefore the dose, required for a particular clinical effect—usually the EC50, the plasma concentration at which 50% of a drug’s maximal effect occurs (Fig. 4-3). Strong opioids, such as morphine and fentanyl, have high efficacy and are termed full agonists or simply agonists. However, fentanyl has a greater affinity for the μ receptor than does morphine, and it is able to produce a similar clinical effect at a lower dose; thus, fentanyl is more potent than morphine. A drug that produces a submaximal effect, irrespective of the dose, is called a partial agonist (see Fig. 4-3). Propoxyphene, oxycodone, and buprenorphine are examples of partial agonists at opioid receptors. Such drugs are also called weak opioids. Weak opioids may have high (e.g., buprenorphine) or low (e.g., codeine) potency.

When an opioid antagonist drug such as naloxone binds to an opioid receptor it exerts no pharmacologic effect (zero efficacy). An antagonist drug functions by preventing access to the receptor population by an agonist. Thus naloxone, which is highly potent, can antagonize the effect of morphine or fentanyl. Similarly, a potent partial agonist such as buprenorphine can potentially antagonize the effect of a less potent strong opioid such as morphine. For this reason, strong and weak opioids should not be used together. The characteristics of opioids that are commonly used in the ICU are shown in Table 4-5.

Clinical Effects

Opioids reduce the sensation of pain in a dose-dependent manner but they do not alter the sensory threshold of pain. Thus, patients report improved analgesia but are usually still aware of their pain. Opioids cause drowsiness and mental clouding and can also cause unpleasant dreams and hallucinations. They diminish the sensation of dyspnea and suppress cough. Other effects include respiratory depression, nausea and vomiting, miosis (small pupils), reduced gastrointestinal motility, urinary retention, and inhibition of the secretion of antidiuretic hormone. The occurrence and severity of these effects are dependent primarily on the efficacy and dose of the opioid rather than on the specific characteristics of a particular agent. However, a patient may tolerate one agent better than another. Therefore, if a particular drug causes unpleasant side effects, such as hallucinations or nausea, it is worth trying another agent.

Respiratory depression is a feature of all strong opioids, is dose-dependent, and can be fatal. Life-threatening respiratory depression is a particular risk when strong opioids are administered by continuous infusion to extubated patients, but respiratory depression is highly unlikely when the same drug is administered by PCA.26 Severe thoracic or abdominal pain can cause chest splinting and respiratory insufficiency. In this situation, administration of a strong opioid can actually improve ventilation and gas exchange.

Opioids depress upper and lower gastrointestinal function. Gastric paresis increases the likelihood of gastroesophageal reflux and can inhibit the tolerance of oral or nasogastric feeding. Opioid-induced inhibition of small and large bowel motility can cause constipation and contribute to ileus, abdominal distension, and intolerance of nasojejunal feeds. To the extent that opioids reduce adrenergic tone, both generally and specifically to pain, all opioids have the potential to cause hypotension. The hemodynamic effects of individual drugs are discussed subsequently.

Prolonged opioid therapy such as that which occurs over the course of an extended critical illness can lead to tolerance and physical dependence. Over several months of treatment, opioid tolerance can be profound. For instance, patients with longstanding cancer pain may have a daily morphine requirement of several hundred milligrams. Tolerance must be borne in mind when patients who are habituated to opioids present for surgery. Opioid withdrawal is initially characterized by agitation, restlessness, mydriasis, and diaphoresis. Subsequently, tachycardia, hypertension, myalgias, vomiting and diarrhea, and abdominal pain may develop. Unlike benzodiazepine withdrawal, opioid withdrawal is not marked by CNS dysfunction (delirium, seizures). Treatment involves reinstitution of a strong opioid and, possibly, the use of a sympatholytic drug such as clonidine. The opioid is then tapered over 1 to 2 weeks. Fortunately, the use of high-dose or prolonged opioid treatment during a critical illness only very rarely results in long-term physical dependence, and the fear of such should not limit the appropriate use of opioid analgesia.

Tramadol

Tramadol is a partial agonist at μ opioid receptors but also exerts its analgesic effect through inhibition of serotonin and norepinephrine uptake within the CNS. It is less efficacious than morphine for the management of severe pain but has only a limited capacity to cause respiratory depression. The incidence and severity of nausea are similar to or worse than those that occur with morphine. Tramadol is usually combined with a nonopioid analgesic for the treatment of moderate pain. Additionally, there are some limited data that indicate that the combination of tramadol and morphine provides superior analgesia to the analgesia of morphine alone for the treatment of severe pain.27 Although the combination of a full and a partial agonist might seem counterproductive, the effect of tramadol on serotonin and norepinephrine reuptake may explain the benefit in this case. When tramadol is combined with the antiemetic ondansetron, a mutual reduction in efficacy occurs.28 Both drugs have been associated with the serotonin syndrome (see later discussion). Tramadol is available for enteral and parenteral use (see Table 4-5) and has an oral bioavailability of nearly 100%. Part of the analgesic activity of tramadol derives from the active metabolite mono-O-desmethyltramadol, which is dependent on the CYP2D6 enzyme system. Inhibition of CYP2D6 (see Table 4-3) greatly reduces the analgesic efficacy of tramadol. CYP2D6 is deficient in 5% to 10% of Caucasians.

Analgesics: Acetaminophen (Paracetamol)

Acetaminophen is an analgesic and antipyretic drug that has almost no antiinflammatory effects. Its mechanism of action is unknown, but it is thought to act centrally through inhibition of the enzymes cyclooxygenase (COX) type 3 (constitutive) and COX-2b (inducible) (see NSAIDs below). At therapeutic doses it has almost no side effects, provides effective analgesia for mild to moderate pain, and has an opioid-sparing effect for severe pain.29 Acetaminophen has been available for oral and rectal use for many years, and recently an intravenous formulation has become available. Intravenous acetaminophen is likely to replace the acetaminophen prodrug, propacetamol, which is currently available for intravenous use in some countries. The oral bioavailability of acetaminophen is 100%, and the dose, whether oral, rectal, or intravenous, is 500 to 1000 mg 6 hourly. Overdose with as little as 10 g of acetaminophen can cause fatal hepatotoxicity. Acetaminophen should be withheld in patients with hepatocellular dysfunction.

Analgesics: Nonsteroidal Antiinflammatory Drugs

NSAIDs inhibit COX, an enzyme necessary for the synthesis of prostaglandins and thromboxane. Two major forms of the enzyme are found in the periphery: COX-2, the inducible form, is involved in inflammation. COX-1, the constitutive form, is found in various sites throughout the body, including blood vessels, the stomach, and the kidney. Many of the prostaglandins formed under the influence of COX-1 have protective functions such as renal vasodilation (Chapter 1) and protection of the gastric mucosa. NSAIDs inhibit both forms of the enzyme.

NSAIDs have analgesic, antipyretic, antiplatelet, and antiinflammatory effects and may be used as supplements to acetaminophen and opioids for the treatment of pain following cardiac surgery.30,31 However, NSAIDs are associated with a number of adverse effects, including renal dysfunction and gastrointestinal bleeding. NSAID-induced renal dysfunction is more likely in patients with preexisting renal dysfunction, impaired ventricular function, or hemodynamic instability. The risk for gastrointestinal bleeding is greatest in patients taking anticoagulant medications in those with histories of peptic ulcer disease. NSAIDs can provoke bronchospasm in patients with asthma and potentially can increase postoperative bleeding. For these reasons, the routine use of NSAIDs in cardiac surgery patients is controversial.32,33

NSAIDs should be avoided in the following circumstances:

If a decision is made to use an NSAID, it may be prudent to wait until the first postoperative creatinine level has been confirmed as normal before administering the first dose. There is some evidence that the concomitant use of ibuprofen reduces the antiplatelet effects of aspirin,34 suggesting that an alternative agent should be used following cardiac surgery. In a recent large-cohort study, the combined use of NSAIDs (including ibuprofen) and aspirin was not associated with an increased risk for myocardial infarction compared to the use of aspirin alone.35

Two NSAIDs that are formulated for intravenous use are tenoxicam (20 to 40 mg once daily) and ketorolac (10 to 20 mg 6 hourly). Orally, diclofenac (75 mg twice daily) or ketoprofen (75 mg three times daily or 200 mg slow-release daily) are options.

NEUROMUSCULAR-BLOCKING DRUGS

Neuromuscular-blocking drugs are used in the ICU to facilitate tracheal intubation and to provide paralysis of skeletal muscles in patients who are mechanically ventilated. Neuromuscular-blocking drugs can be extremely useful for patients in the acute phase of a critical illness characterized by severe cardiac or respiratory insufficiency. Neuromuscular-blocking drugs are also sometimes indicated following routine cardiac surgery in patients who develop ventilator dysynchrony or shivering. The majority of patients who are mechanically ventilated do not require muscular paralysis, and these drugs should be reserved for patients with specific indications and should be discontinued as soon as possible. Inappropriate use of neuromuscular-blocking drugs delays extubation, can exacerbate postextubation respiratory insufficiency, and predisposes patients to the development of critical-illness polymyoneuropathy (Chapter 37).38 Furthermore, the use of paralyzing drugs in the absence of sufficient sedation and analgesia results in unpleasant awareness.

Assessment of Neuromuscular Function

The onset of neuromuscular blockade is apparent in the presence of apnea, the loss of muscle tone, and the development of suitable conditions for endotracheal intubation. Recovery is evident by the resumption of spontaneous ventilation and the ability to perform certain motor functions, such as hand clench and head lift. These simple tests are adequate for most situations in the ICU, but they are not specific for neuromuscular function and do not rule out the presence of clinically important residual weakness. In certain circumstances, such as defining the cause of unexplained apnea or ensuring the absence of residual paralysis prior to extubation, assessment of neuromuscular function with a peripheral nerve stimulator is indicated.

One way of gauging neuromuscular function by using a nerve stimulator is to assess the strength of thumb adduction in response to a train-of-four stimulation of the ulnar nerve. The nerve stimulator is connected to surface electrodes on the distal ulnar side of the forearm. One electrode is placed 1 cm proximal to the wrist crease and the other electrode is placed 2 to 3 cm farther up on the forearm. The nerve stimulator is then set to deliver four brief impulses at 60 to 80 mA, 0.5 seconds apart. The normal response to train-of-four stimulation is four strong twitches of the thumb, each of equal intensity, whereas complete neuromuscular blockade fails to elicit any response. As recovery of function occurs, the first of the four stimuli elicits a weak twitch; then progressively, the second, third, and fourth twitches return (Fig. 4-4). Once four twitches have returned, residual neuromuscular blockade is identified by the presence of fade, where the intensity of the first twitch is greater than that of the last twitch. Patients should not be extubated until there are four strong twitches with minimal fade. Residual neuromuscular blockade resulting from nondepolarizing agents can be reversed with neostigmine, as described later.

Nondepolarizing Neuromuscular-blocking Drugs

Reversal of Nondepolarizing Muscle Relaxants

Residual neuromuscular blockade (see earlier material) caused by nondepolarizing neuromuscular blocking drugs can be reversed by intravenous neostigmine (50 μg/kg). Neostigmine inhibits the enzyme cholinesterase that is responsible for the breakdown of acetylcholine at the neuromuscular junction. Thus, acetylcholine levels rise and competitively antagonize the neuromuscular blocking drug. In addition, neostigmine inhibits cholinesterase at parasympathetic muscarinic cholinergic receptors and can therefore cause bradycardia, bronchospasm, and increased gastrointestinal activity. To avoid these side effects, neostigmine is typically coadministered with a muscarinic cholinergic receptor antagonist such as atropine (20 μg/kg) or glycopyrrolate (5 μg/kg).

Suxamethonium (succinylcholine)

Suxamethonium is a depolarizing neuromuscular-blocking drug that consists of two acetylcholine molecules joined together. At a dose of 1 to 1.5 mg/kg, suxamethonium causes extremely rapid muscular paralysis, and optimal intubating conditions are obtained within 30 to 60 seconds. Paralysis is preceded by a brief period of intense muscle fasiculation and rigidity. The drug is rapidly metabolized by plasma cholinesterase, which results in a duration of effect of 5 to 10 minutes following a standard dose. Suxamethonium is indicated primarily for rapid-sequence intubation (Chapter 40) because intubating conditions are obtained with sufficient speed that a period of bag-mask ventilation is not required. However, the use of suxamethonium is limited by a range of adverse effects, some of which are life-threatening.

In normal subjects, suxamethonium causes a small rise in serum potassium of about 0.5 mmol/l. However, in certain disease states (Table 4-6), a massive rise in serum potassium sufficient to cause life-threatening ventricular arrhythmias can occur. Two conditions that are associated with suxamethonium hyperkalemia are of particular concern in the ICU: stroke and critical illness polymyoneuropathy. The risk of suxamethonium hyperkalemia evolves over the first few days following a stroke and resolves over several months. An alternative to suxamethonium should also be considered in patients with prolonged immobility.

Table 4-6 Conditions in which Suxamethonium is Associated with Massive Hyperkalemia

Stroke
Paraplegia
Muscular dystrophy
Critical illness polymyoneuropathy
Prolonged and severe intraabdominal infections
Head injury
Trauma
Burns
Prolonged immobility

In hyperkalemic patients, a normal increase in serum potassium can be expected with suxamethonium. Thus, suxamethonium may be used safely in patients with chronic hyperkalemia that is only moderate (i.e., potassium <6.5 mmol/l). In patients with acute hyperkalemia or chronic hyperkalemia that is severe, suxamethonium should be avoided. Other side effects of suxamethonium include bradycardia, muscle pains, raised intraocular pressure, and raised intragastric pressure. Suxamethonium can also trigger malignant hyperpyrexia. Prolonged neuromuscular blockade (>1 hour) may occur unexpectedly in patients with congenital cholinesterase deficiency and following repeated doses of suxamethonium.

ANTIEMETICS

Nausea and vomiting are common following cardiac surgery, occurring in 30% to 50% of patients.39,40 The incidence and severity are greatest on the first postoperative day and then usually settle. However, in some patients nausea and vomiting persist for days, precluding oral intake and delaying recovery. The incidence is higher in females and younger patients and in those with histories of motion sickness or postoperative nausea and vomiting. Routine gastric decompression with a nasogastric tube does not reduce the incidence.41

Unfortunately, drug therapy for nausea and vomiting is not particularly effective. For patients with severe symptoms, a multimodal approach utilizing two or three antiemetics with different mechanisms of actions is the best approach. Drugs known to exacerbate nausea and vomiting, particularly opioid analgesics, should be avoided where possible. However, severe pain exacerbates nausea, and there may be no alternative to opioids. In most circumstances it is appropriate to administer antiemetics only if nausea and vomiting develop following extubation, but in patients with histories of this problem, prophylactic administration commencing from the time of admission to the ICU is appropriate.

Most antiemetic medications act on the chemoreceptor trigger zone, a part of the brain that lies in the floor of the fourth ventricle and has a relatively permeable blood-brain barrier. The chemoreceptor trigger zone contains dopamine, histamine, serotonin, and acetylcholine receptors, the stimulation of which leads to nausea and vomiting.

Serotonin Antagonists

Antagonists of the 5-hydroxytryptamine type 3 receptor (5-HT3), such as ondansetron and granisetron, are useful antiemetics and have very few side effects; headache and transient elevations in liver function tests occasionally occur.43 For the treatment of established nausea and vomiting, 4 mg of ondansetron is as effective as 8 mg.44 The dose may be repeated 8 hourly. Combined use of a 5-HT3 receptor antagonist and tramadol should be avoided (see Tramadol, earlier).

SEROTONIN SYNDROME

Serotonin syndrome is a state of heightened CNS activity manifested by agitation, autonomic hyperactivity, hyperreflexia, and delirium.47 It occasionally occurs as a side effect of drugs that potentiate serotonin activity, particularly when multiple serotoninergic drugs are used in combination. The syndrome should always be considered in patients who are being treated with a selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor antidepressant and who develop symptoms of CNS excitation. Commonly used drugs that are associated with the syndrome are listed in Table 4-7.

Table 4-7 Drugs that Are Associated with the Serotonin Syndrome

Selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors
Monoamine oxidase inhibitors
Tricyclic antidepressants
Analgesics: meperidine and tramadol
Antiemetics: metoclopramide, ondansetron, granisetron
Antibiotics: linezolid, ritonavir
Others: valproate, lithium, sumatriptan (for migraine), sibutramine

From Boyer EW, Shannon M: The serotonin syndrome. N Engl J Med 352:1112-1120, 2005.49

REFERENCES

1 Hughes MA, Glass PS, Jacobs JR. Context-sensitive half-time in multicompartment pharmacokinetic models for intravenous anesthetic drugs. Anesthesiology. 1992;76:334-341.

2 Ostermann ME, Keenan SP, Seiferling RA, et al. Sedation in the intensive care unit: a systematic review. JAMA. 2000;283:1451-1459.

3 Jacobi J, Fraser GL, Coursin DB, et al. Clinical practice guidelines for the sustained use of sedatives and analgesics in the critically ill adult. Crit Care Med. 2002;30:119-141.

4 Kollef MH, Levy NT, Ahrens TS, et al. The use of continuous IV sedation is associated with prolongation of mechanical ventilation. Chest. 1998;114:541-548.

5 Mondello E, Siliotti R, Noto G, et al. Bispectral index in ICU: correlation with Ramsay score on assessment of sedation level. J Clin Monitor Comput. 2002;17:271-277.

6 Berkenbosch JW, Fichter CR, Tobias JD. The correlation of the bispectral index monitor with clinical sedation scores during mechanical ventilation in the pediatric intensive care unit. Anesth Analges. 2002;94:506-511.

7 Vivien B, Di Maria S, Ouattara A, et al. Overestimation of Bispectral Index in sedated intensive care unit patients revealed by administration of muscle relaxant. Anesthesiology. 2003;99:9-17.

8 McMurray TJ, Collier PS, Carson IW, et al. Propofol sedation after open heart surgery: a clinical and pharmacokinetic study. Anaesthesia. 1990;45:322-326.

9 Cremer OL, Moons KG, Bouman EA, et al. Long-term propofol infusion and cardiac failure in adult head-injured patients. Lancet. 2001;357:117-118.

10 Herr DL, Sum-Ping ST, England M. ICU sedation after coronary artery bypass graft surgery: dexmedetomidine-based versus propofol-based sedation regimens. J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth. 2003;17:576-584.

11 Glassman AH, Bigger JTJ. Antipsychotic drugs: prolonged QTc interval, torsades de pointes, and sudden death. Am J Psychiatr. 2001;158:1774-1782.

12 Shale JH, Mastin WD, Shale CM. A review of the safety and efficacy of droperidol for the rapid sedation of severely agitated and violent patients. J Clin Psychiatr. 2003;64:500-505.

13 Schwartz TL, Masand PS. The role of atypical antipsychotics in the treatment of delirium. Psychosomatics. 2002;43:171-174.

14 Greenwald LV, Baisden CE, Symbas PN. Rib fractures in coronary bypass patients: radionuclide detection. Radiology. 1983;148:553-554.

15 Mueller XM, Tinguely F, Tevaearai HT, et al. Pain location, distribution, and intensity after cardiac surgery. Chest. 2000;118:391-396.

16 Izzat MB, Yim APC, El-Zufari MH, et al. Upper T mini-sternotomy for aortic valve operations. Chest. 1998;114:291-294.

17 Lichtenberg A, Hagl C, Harringer W, et al. Effects of minimal invasive coronary artery bypass on pulmonary function and postoperative pain. Ann Thorac Surg. 2002;70:461-465.

18 Bauer M, Pasic M, Ewert R, et al. Ministernotomy versus complete sternotomy for coronary bypass operations: no difference in postoperative pulmonary function. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2001;121:702-707.

19 Diegeler A, Walther T, Metz S, et al. Comparison of MIDCAP versus conventional CABG surgery regarding pain and quality of life. Heart Surg Forum. 1999;2:290-295.

20 Whipple JK, Lewis KS, Quebbeman EJ, et al. Analysis of pain management in critically ill patients. Pharmacotherapy. 1995;15:592-599.

21 Puntillo KA, Morris AB, Thompson CL, et al. Pain behaviors observed during six common procedures: Results from Thunder Project II. Crit Care Med. 2004;32:421-427.

22 Boldt J, Thaler E, Lehmann A, et al. Pain management in cardiac surgery patients: comparison between standard therapy and patient-controlled analgesia regimen. J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth. 1998;12:654-658.

23 Gust R, Pecher S, Gust A, et al. Effect of patient-controlled analgesia on pulmonary complications after coronary artery bypass grafting. Crit Care Med. 1999;27:2218-2223.

24 Priestley MC, Cope L, Halliwell R, et al. Thoracic epidural anesthesia for cardiac surgery: the effects on tracheal intubation time and length of hospital stay. Anesth Analges. 2002;94:275-282.

25 Stenseth R, Bjella L, Berg EM, et al. Effects of thoracic epidural analgesia on pulmonary function after coronary artery bypass surgery. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 1996;10:859-865.

26 Schug SA, Torrie JJ. Safety assessment of postoperative pain management by an acute pain service. Pain. 1993;55:387-391.

27 Webb AR, Leong S, Burn SJ, et al. The addition of a tramadol infusion to morphine patient-controlled analgesia after abdominal surgery: a double-blinded, placebo-controlled randomized trial. Anesth Analges. 2002;95:1713-1718.

28 Hammonds B, Sidebotham DA, Anderson BJ. Aspects of tramadol and ondansetron interactions. Acute Pain. 2003;5:31-34.

29 Schug SA, Sidebotham DA, McGuinnety M, et al. Acetaminophen as an adjunct to morphine by patient-controlled analgesia in the management of acute postoperative pain. Anesth Analges. 1998;87:368-372.

30 Hynninen MS, Cheng DC, Hossain I, et al. Non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs in treatment of postoperative pain after cardiac surgery. Can J Anaesth. 2000;47:1182-1187.

31 Rapanos T, Murphy P, Szalai JP, et al. Rectal indomethacin reduces postoperative pain and morphine use after cardiac surgery. Can J Anaesth. 1999;46:725-730.

32 Griffin M. Con: nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs should not be routinely administered for postoperative analgesia after cardiac surgery. J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth. 2000;14:735-738.

33 Ralley FE, Day FJ, Cheng DC. Pro: nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs should be routinely administered for postoperative analgesia after cardiac surgery. J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesthes. 2000;14:731-734.

34 Catella-Lawson F, Reilly MP, Kapoor SC, et al. Cyclooxygenase inhibitors and the antiplatelet effects of aspirin. N Engl J Med. 2001;345:1809-1817.

35 Garcia Rodriguez LA, Varas-Lorenzo C, Maguire A, et al. Nonsteroidal antiinflammatory drugs and the risk of myocardial infarction in the general population. Circulation. 2004;109:3000-3006.

36 Fitzgerald GA. Coxibs and cardiovascular disease. N Engl J Med. 2004;351:1709-1711.

37 Nussmeier NA, Whelton AA, Brown MT, et al. Complications of the COX-2 inhibitors parecoxib and valdecoxib after cardiac surgery. N Engl J Med. 2005;352:1081-1091.

38 Garnacho-Montero J, Madrazo-Osuna J, Garcia-Garmendia JL, et al. Critical illness polyneuropathy: risk factors and clinical consequences: a cohort study in septic patients. Intens Care Med. 2001;27:1288-1296.

39 Grebenik CR, Allman C. Nausea and vomiting after cardiac surgery. Br J Anaesth. 1996;77:356-359.

40 Woodward DK, Sherry KM, Harrison D. Antiemetic prophylaxis in cardiac surgery: comparison of metoclopramide and ondansetron. Br J Anaesth. 1999;83:933-935.

41 Burlacu CL, Healy D, Buggy DJ, et al. Continuous gastric decompression for postoperative nausea and vomiting after coronary revascularization surgery. Anesth Analges. 2005;100:321-326.

42 Domino KB, Anderson EA, Polissar NL, et al. Comparative efficacy and safety of ondansetron, droperidol, and metoclopramide for preventing postoperative nausea and vomiting: a meta-analysis. Anesth Analges. 1999;88:1370-1379.

43 Tramer MR, Reynolds DJ, Moore RA, et al. Efficacy, dose-response, and safety of ondansetron in prevention of postoperative nausea and vomiting: a quantitative systematic review of randomized placebo-controlled trials. Anesthesiology. 1997;87:1277-1289.

44 Tramer MR, Moore RA, Reynolds DJ, et al. A quantitative systematic review of ondansetron in treatment of established postoperative nausea and vomiting. BMJ. 1997;314:1088-1092.

45 Henzi I, Walder B, Tramer MR. Dexamethasone for the prevention of postoperative nausea and vomiting: a quantitative systematic review. Anesthes Analges. 2000;90:186-194.

46 Lee Y, Lai HY, Lin PC, et al. A dose ranging study of dexamethasone for preventing patient-controlled analgesia-related nausea and vomiting: a comparison of droperidol with saline. Anesth Analges. 2004;98:1066-1071.

47 Schulte-Tamburen AM, Scheier J, Briegel J, et al. Comparison of five sedation scoring systems by means of auditory evoked potentials. Intens Care Med. 1999;25:377-382.

48 Wilkinson GR. Drug metabolism and variability among patients in drug response. N Engl J Med. 2005;352:2211-2221.

49 Boyer EW, Shannon M. The serotonin syndrome. N Engl J Med. 2005;352:1112-1120.