Role of Microscopy

Published on 08/02/2015 by admin

Filed under Basic Science

Last modified 22/04/2025

Print this page

rate 1 star rate 2 star rate 3 star rate 4 star rate 5 star
Your rating: none, Average: 3.2 (5 votes)

This article have been viewed 14638 times

Role of Microscopy

The basic flow of procedures involved in the laboratory diagnosis of infectious diseases is as follows:

For certain infectious diseases, this process may also include measuring the patient’s immune response to the infectious agent.

Microscopy is the most common method used both for the detection of microorganisms directly in clinical specimens and for the characterization of organisms grown in culture (Box 6-1). Microscopy is defined as the use of a microscope to magnify (i.e., visually enlarge) objects too small to be visualized with the naked eye so that their characteristics are readily observable. Because most infectious agents cannot be detected with the unaided eye, microscopy plays a pivotal role in the laboratory. Microscopes and microscopic methods vary, but only those of primary use in diagnostic microbiology are discussed.

The method used to process patient specimens is dictated by the type and body source of specimen (see Part VII). Regardless of the method used, some portion of the specimen usually is reserved for microscopic examination. Specific stains or dyes applied to the specimens, combined with particular methods of microscopy, can detect etiologic agents in a rapid, relatively inexpensive, and productive way. Microscopy also plays a key role in the characterization of organisms that have been cultivated in the laboratory (for more information regarding cultivation of bacteria, see Chapter 7).

The types of microorganisms to be detected, identified, and characterized determine the most appropriate types of microscopy to use. Table 6-1 outlines the four types of microscopy used in diagnostic microbiology and their relative utility for each of the four major types of infectious agents. Bright-field microscopy (also known as light microscopy) and fluorescence microscopy have the widest use and application within the clinical microbiology laboratory. Dark field and electron microscopes are not typically found within a clinical laboratory and are predominantly used in reference or research settings. Which microorganisms can be detected or identified by each microscopic method also depends on the methods used to highlight the microorganisms and their key characteristics. This enhancement is usually achieved using various dyes or stains.

TABLE 6-1

Microscopy for Diagnostic Microbiology

Organism Group Bright-Field Microscopy Fluorescence Microscopy Dark-Field Microscopy Electron Microscopy
Bacteria + + ±
Fungi + +
Parasites + + ±
Viruses + ±

image

+, Commonly used; ±, limited use; –, rarely used.

Bright-Field (Light) Microscopy

Principles of Light Microscopy

For light microscopy, visible light is passed through the specimen and then through a series of lenses that bend the light in a manner that results in magnification of the organisms present in the specimen (Figure 6-1). The total magnification achieved is the product of the lenses used.

Resolution

To optimize visualization, other factors besides magnification must be considered. Resolution, defined as the extent to which detail in the magnified object is maintained, is also essential. Without it everything would be magnified as an indistinguishable blur. Therefore, resolving power, which is the closest distance between two objects that when magnified still allows the two objects to be distinguished from each other, is extremely important. The resolving power of most light microscopes allows bacterial cells to be distinguished from one another but usually does not allow bacterial structures, internal or external, to be detected.

To achieve the level of resolution desired with 1000× magnification, oil immersion must be used in conjunction with light microscopy. Immersion oil has specific optical and viscosity characteristics designed for use in microscopy. Immersion oil is used to fill the space between the objective lens and the glass slide onto which the specimen has been affixed. When light passes from a material of one refractive index to a material with a different refractive index, as from glass to air, the light bends. Light of different wavelengths bend at different angles creating a less distinct distorted image. Placing immersion oil with the same refractive index as glass between the objective lens and the coverslip or slide decreases the number of refractive surfaces the light must pass through during microscopy. The oil enhances resolution by preventing light rays from dispersing and changing wavelength after passing through the specimen. A specific objective lens, the oil immersion lens, is designed for use with oil; this lens provides 100× magnification on most light microscopes.

Lower magnifications (i.e., 100× or 400×) may be used to locate specimen samples in certain areas on a microscope slide or to observe microorganisms such as some fungi and parasites. The 1000× magnification provided by the combination of ocular and oil immersion lenses usually is required for optimal detection and characterization of bacteria.

Contrast

The third key component to light microscopy is contrast, which is needed to make objects stand out from the background. Because microorganisms are essentially transparent, owing to their microscopic dimensions and high water content, they cannot be easily detected among the background materials and debris in patient specimens. Lack of contrast is also a problem for the microscopic examination of microorganisms grown in culture. Contrast is most commonly achieved by staining techniques that highlight organisms and allow them to be differentiated from one another and from background material and debris. In the absence of staining, the simplest way to improve contrast is to reduce the diameter of the microscope aperture diaphragm increasing contrast at the expense of the resolution. Setting the controls for bright field microscopy requires a procedure referred to as setting the Kohler illumination (see Procedure 6-1 on the Evolve site).

Procedure 6-1   Kohler Illumination

Method

1. Turn on the microscope, and adjust the light source so that it is approximately at a maximum of 50% strength.

2. Place a microscope slide containing a specimen on the stage, and secure in place with the slide clips.

3. Adjust the eyepiece for comfort and proper alignment for interpupillary distance.

4. Using the 10× objective for a total magnification of 100×, focus the specimen.

5. Adjust each individual eyepiece. To focus the left eyepiece, close the right eye and use the fine focus to adjust the image. Close the left eye and use the Diopter ring on the right eyepiece to adjust the focus for the right eye.

6. Close the field diaphragm and the condenser aperture. A small circle of light should be visible.

7. If no light is visible, open the field diaphragm until a circle of light is present.

8. Adjust the condenser screws as needed to center the light in the field of view.

9. Adjust the condenser focus knob until the light appears as a sharp circle.

10. Remove the eyepiece and look down the cylinder. A circle of light should be visible in the center of a dark field.

11. Open the diaphragm until the circle of light fills three fourths of the field of view.

12. Place the eyepiece back into the cylinder and record the condenser diaphragm setting for the 10× objective.

Staining Techniques for Light Microscopy

Smear Preparation

Staining methods are either used directly with patient specimens or are applied to preparations made from microorganisms grown in culture. A direct smear is a preparation of the primary clinical sample received in the laboratory for processing. A direct smear provides a mechanism to identify the number and type of cells present in a specimen, including white blood cells, epithelial cells, and predominant organism type. Occasionally an organism may grow in culture that was not seen in the direct smear. There are a variety of potential reasons for this, including the possibility that a slow-growing organism was present, the patient was receiving antibiotic treatment to prevent growth of the organism, the specimen was not processed appropriately and the organisms are no longer viable, or the organism requires special media for growth. Preparation of an indirect smear indicates that the primary sample has been processed in culture and the smear contains organisms following purification or growth on artificial media. Indirect smears may include preparation from solid or semisolid media or broth. Care should be taken to ensure the smear is not too thick when preparing the slide from solid media. In addition, smear from a liquid broth should not be diluted. Liquid broth cultures result in smears that more clearly and accurately represent the native cellular morphology and arrangement in comparison to smears from solid media. Details of specimen processing are presented throughout Part VII, and in most instances the preparation of every specimen includes the application of some portion of the specimen to a clean glass slide (i.e., “smear” preparation) for subsequent microscopic evaluation.

Generally, specimen samples are placed on the slide using a swab that contains patient material or by using a pipette into which liquid specimen has been aspirated (Figure 6-2). Material to be stained is dropped (if liquid) or rolled (if on a swab) onto the surface of a clean, dry, glass slide. To avoid contamination of culture media, once a swab has touched the surface of a nonsterile slide, it should not be used for subsequently inoculating media.

A slide may also be presterilized to avoid contaminating the swab when only a single specimen is received for processing of slides and cultures. Sterilization can be performed by thoroughly flaming the slide using a Bunsen burner and allowing it to cool before use. The slide may be alternately dipped in absolute ethanol and flamed, allowing the alcohol to burn off and thereby killing contaminating organisms. These techniques, although useful, may be limited by increasing safety regulations and the removal of open flame equipment such as Bunsen burners within the clinical laboratory.

For staining microorganisms grown in culture, a sterile loop or needle may be used to transfer a small amount of growth from a solid medium to the surface of the slide. This material is emulsified in a drop of sterile water or saline on the slide. For small amounts of growth that might become lost in even a drop of saline, a sterile wooden applicator stick can be used to touch the growth; this material is then rubbed directly onto the slide, where it can be easily seen. The material placed on the slide to be stained is allowed to air-dry and is affixed to the slide by placing it on a slide warmer (60° C) for at least 10 minutes or by flooding it with 95% methanol for 1 minute. Smears should be air-dried completely prior to heat fixing to prevent the distortion of cell shapes prior to staining. To examine organisms grown in liquid medium, an aspirated sample of the broth culture is applied to the slide, air-dried, and fixed before staining.

A squash or crush prep may be used for tissue, bone marrow aspirate, or other aspirated sample. The aspirate may be placed in the anticoagulant ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid (EDTA) tube and inverted several times to mix contents. This prevents clotting of the aspirated material. To prepare the slide, place a drop of the aspirate on a slide and then gently place a second slide on top, pressing the two slides together and crushing or squashing any particulate matter. Gently slide or pull the two slides apart using a horizontal motion. Air-dry the slides before staining.

Smear preparation varies depending on the type of specimen being processed (see the chapters in Part VII that discuss specific specimen types) and on the staining methods to be used. Nonetheless, the general rule for smear preparation is that sufficient material must be applied to the slide so that chances for detecting and distinguishing microorganisms are maximized. At the same time, the application of excessive material that could interfere with the passage of light through the specimen or that could distort the details of microorganisms must be avoided. Finally, the staining method to be used is dictated by which microorganisms are suspected in the specimen.

As listed in Table 6-1, light microscopy has applications for bacteria, fungi, and parasites. However, the stains used for these microbial groups differ extensively. Those primarily designed for examination of parasites and fungi by light microscopy are discussed in Chapters 47 and 60, respectively. The stains for microscopic examination of bacteria, the Gram stain and the acid-fast stains, are discussed in this chapter.

Gram Stain

The Gram stain is the principal stain used for microscopic examination of bacteria and is one of the most important bacteriologic techniques within the microbiology laboratory. Gram staining provides a mechanism for the rapid presumptive identification of pathogens, and it gives important clues related to the quality of a specimen and whether bacterial pathogens from a specific body site are considered normal flora colonizing the site or the actual cause of infection. Nearly all clinically important bacteria can be detected using this method, the only exceptions being those organisms that exist almost exclusively within host cells (e.g., chlamydia), those that lack a cell wall (e.g., mycoplasma and ureaplasma), and those of insufficient dimension to be resolved by light microscopy (e.g., spirochetes). First devised by Hans Christian Gram during the late nineteenth century, the Gram stain can be used to divide most bacterial species into two large groups: those that take up the basic dye, crystal violet (i.e., gram-positive bacteria), and those that allow the crystal violet dye to wash out easily with the decolorizer alcohol or acetone (i.e., gram-negative bacteria).

Procedure Overview.

Although modifications of the classic Gram stain that involve changes in reagents and timing exist, the principles and results are the same for all modifications. The classic Gram stain procedure entails fixing clinical material to the surface of the microscope slide, either by heating or by using methanol. Methanol fixation preserves the morphology of host cells, as well as bacteria, and is especially useful for examining bloody specimen material. Slides are overlaid with 95% methanol for 1 minute; the methanol is allowed to run off, and the slides are air-dried before staining. After fixation, the first step in the Gram stain is the application of the primary stain crystal violet. A mordant, Gram’s iodine, is applied after the crystal violet to chemically bond the alkaline dye to the bacterial cell wall. The decolorization step distinguishes gram-positive from gram-negative cells. After decolorization, organisms that stain gram-positive retain the crystal violet and those that are gram-negative are cleared of crystal violet. Addition of the counterstain safranin will stain the clear gram-negative bacteria pink or red (Figure 6-3). See Procedure 6-2 on the Evolve site for detailed methodology, expected results, and limitations.

Procedure 6-2   Gram Stain

Principle

The two major groups of bacteria can be divided into gram-positive and gram-negative. The Gram stain technique is based on the differential structure of the cellular membranes and cell walls of the two groups. Gram-positive organisms contain a highly cross-linked layer of peptidoglycan that retains the primary dye, crystal violet (CV), following the application of the mordant, iodine (I). The iodine and crystal violet form a complex within the peptidoglycan. When decolorizer is applied to the cells, the CV-I complex remains within the cell, making it appear dark purple to blue. The gram-negative organisms do not contain a thick cross-linked layer of peptidoglycan. The peptidoglycan is loosely distributed between the inner cell and outer cell membrane. Following application of the crystal violet and iodine, the CV-I complexes are not trapped within the peptidoglycan. Application of the acid-alcohol decolorizer dehydrates the outer cellular membrane, leaving holes in the membrane and effectively washing or removing the CV-I complex from the cells. The cells appear colorless. To make the colorless cells visible, a secondary stain, safranin, is applied, leaving the gram-negative cells pink.

Reporting Results

Direct Smear

1. Examine the slide for cells including epithelial, red blood cells and white blood cells. Red blood cells may stain faintly. White blood cells should appear as light pink cells with a dark pink or red nucleus. White blood cells may be differentiated into polymorphonuclear cells (PMNs) and mononuclear cells. No further differentiation of white blood cells should be attempted using the Gram stain.

2. Examine the slide for microorganisms characteristic morphologies and arrangements including gram-positive versus gram-negative, cocci, bacilli, spirochetes, curved-rods, large or small in singlets, pairs, clusters, chains, or diplococci. Indicate pleomorphic, coccobacillary or diphtheroids if applicable.

3. If bacterial spores are present, indicate cellular location such as terminal or subterminal and shape such as oval or round. (Note: Spores may occasionally be seen in certain Gram-positive rods. Spores do not stain with Gram stain reagents but will appear as clear areas within the cells.)

4. Quantitate organisms as follows:

Many 4+ 10 to 20 per oil immersion field
Moderate 3+ 6 to 10 per oil immersion field
Few 2+ 3 to 5 per oil immersion field
Rare 1+ Fewer than 10 identified on complete smear
None    

5. Quantitate cells (WBCs, RBCs, and epithelial) as follows:

Many 4+ 25 or greater per low-power field
Moderate 3+ 10 to 25 per low-power field
Few 2+ 2 to 10 per low-power field
Rare 1+ Fewer than 2 per low-power field
None    

Note: These are general guidelines. Specific quantitation methods may vary in individual laboratories. In addition, sputum specimens may be rejected based on an increased presence of epithelial cells and a decreased presence of white blood cells.

Limitations

1. Overdecolorization may result in the identification of false gram-negative results, whereas underdecolorization may result in the identification of false gram-positive results.

2. Smears that are too thick or viscous may retain too much primary stain, making identification of proper Gram stain reactions difficult. Gram-negative organisms may not decolorize properly.

3. Cultures older than 16 to 18 hours will contain living and dead cells. Cells that are dead will be deteriorating and will not retain the stain properly.

4. Stain may form precipitate with aging. Filtering through gauze will remove excess crystals.

5. Gram stains from patients on antibiotics or antimicrobial therapy may have altered Gram stain reactivity due to the successful treatment.

6. Occasionally, pneumococci identified in the lower respiratory tract on a direct smear will not grow in culture. Some strains are obligate anaerobes.

7. Toxin-producing organisms such as Clostridia, staphylococci, and streptococci may destroy white blood cells within a purulent specimen.

8. Faintly staining Gram-negative organisms, such as Campylobacter and Brucella, may be visualized using an alternative counterstain (e.g., basic fuchsin).

Quality Control

Gram-positive Staphylococcus aureus
Gram-negative Escherichia coli

Principle.

The difference in composition between gram-positive cell walls, which contain thick peptidoglycan with numerous teichoic acid cross-linkages, and gram-negative cell walls, which consist of a thinner layer of peptidoglycan, and the presence of an outer lipid bilayer that is dehydrated during decolorization, accounts for the Gram staining differences between these two major groups of bacteria. Presumably, the extensive teichoic acid cross-links contribute to the ability of gram-positive organisms to resist alcohol decolorization. Although the gram-positive organisms may take up the counterstain, their purple appearance will not be altered.

Gram-positive organisms that have lost cell wall integrity because of antibiotic treatment, dead or dying cells, or action of autolytic enzymes may allow the crystal violet to wash out with the decolorizing step and may appear gram-variable, with some cells staining pink and others staining purple. However, for identification purposes, these organisms are considered to be truly gram-positive. On the other hand, gram-negative bacteria rarely, if ever, retain crystal violet (e.g., appear purple) if the staining procedure has been properly performed. Host cells, such as red and white blood cells (phagocytes), allow the crystal violet stain to wash out with decolorization and should appear pink on smears that have been correctly prepared and stained.

Gram Stain Examination.

Once stained, the smear is examined using the 10× objective (100× magnification). The microbiologist should scan the slide looking for white blood cells, epithelial cells, debris, and larger organisms such as fungi or parasites. Next the smear should be examined using the oil immersion (1000× magnification) lens. When clinical material is Gram stained (e.g., the direct smear), the slide is evaluated for the presence of bacterial cells as well as the Gram reactions, morphologies (e.g., cocci or bacilli), and arrangements (e.g., chains, pairs, clusters) of the cells seen (Figure 6-4). This information often provides a preliminary diagnosis regarding the infectious agents and frequently is used to direct initial therapies for the patient.

The direct smears should also be examined for the presence of inflammatory cells (e.g., phagocytes) that are key indicators of an infectious process. Noting the presence of other host cells, such as squamous epithelial cells in respiratory specimens, is also helpful because the presence of these cells may indicate contamination with organisms and cells from the mouth (for more information regarding interpretation of respiratory smears, see Chapter 71). Observing background tissue debris and proteinaceous material, which generally stain gram-negative, also provides helpful information. For example, the presence of such material indicates that specimen material was adequately affixed to the slide. Therefore, the absence of bacteria or inflammatory cells on such a smear is a true negative and not likely the result of loss of specimen during staining (Figure 6-5). Other ways that Gram stain evaluations of how direct smears are used are discussed throughout the chapters of Part VII that deal with infections of specific body sites.

Several examples of Gram stains of direct smears are provided in Figure 6-6. Basically, whatever is observed is also recorded and is used to produce a laboratory report for the physician. The report typically includes the following (see Procedure 6-2):

• The presence of host cells and debris.

• The Gram reactions, morphologies (e.g., cocci, bacilli, coccobacilli), and arrangement of bacterial cells present. Note: Reporting the absence of bacteria and host cells can be equally as important.

• Optionally, the relative amounts of bacterial cells (e.g., rare, few, moderate, many) may be provided. However, it is important to remember that to visualize bacterial cells by light microscopy, a minimum concentration of 105 cells per 1 mL of specimen is required. This is a large number of bacteria for any normally sterile body site and to describe the quantity as rare or few based on microscopic observation may be understating their significance in a clinical specimen. On the other hand, noting the relative amounts seen on direct smear may be useful laboratory information to correlate smear results with the amount of growth observed subsequently from cultures.

Although Gram stain evaluation of direct smears is routinely used as an aid in the diagnosis of bacterial infections, unexpected but significant findings of other infectious etiologies may be detected and cannot be ignored. For example, fungal cells and elements generally stain gram-positive, but they may take up the crystal violet poorly and appear gram-variable (e.g., both pink and purple) or gram-negative. Because infectious agents besides bacteria may be detected by Gram stain, any unusual cells or structures observed on the smear should be evaluated further before being dismissed as unimportant (Figure 6-7).

Gram Stain of Bacteria Grown in Culture.

The Gram stain also plays a key role in the identification of bacteria grown in culture. Similar to direct smears, indirect smears prepared from bacterial growth are evaluated for the bacterial cells’ Gram reactions, morphologies, and arrangements (see Figure 6-4). If growth from more than one specimen is to be stained on the same slide, a wax pencil may be used to create divisions. Drawing a “map” of such a slide allows different Gram stain results to be recorded in an organized fashion (Figure 6-8). The smear results will be used to determine subsequent testing for identifying and characterizing the organisms isolated from the patient specimen.

Acid-Fast Stains

The acid-fast stain is the other commonly used stain for light-microscopic examination of bacteria.

Principle.

The acid-fast stain is specifically designed for a subset of bacteria whose cell walls contain long-chain fatty (mycolic) acids. Mycolic acids render the cells resistant to decolorization, even with acid alcohol decolorizers. Thus, these bacteria are referred to as being acid-fast. Although these organisms may stain slightly or poorly as gram-positive, the acid-fast stain takes full advantage of the waxy content of the cell walls to maximize detection. Mycobacteria are the most commonly encountered acid-fast bacteria, typified by Mycobacterium tuberculosis, the etiologic agent of tuberculosis. Bacteria lacking cell walls fortified with mycolic acids cannot resist decolorization with acid alcohol and are categorized as being non–acid-fast, a trait typical of most other clinically relevant bacteria. However, some degree of acid-fastness is a characteristic of a few nonmycobacterial bacteria, such as Nocardia spp., and coccidian parasites, such as Cryptosporidium spp.

Procedure Overview.

The classic acid-fast staining method, Ziehl-Neelsen, is depicted in Figure 6-9 and outlined in Procedure 6-3 on the Evolve site. The procedure requires heat to allow the primary stain (carbolfuchsin) to enter the wax-containing cell wall. A modification of this procedure, the Kinyoun acid-fast method (see Procedure 6-4 on the Evolve site), does not require the use of heat or boiling water, minimizing safety concerns during the procedure. Because of a higher concentration of phenol in the primary stain solution, heat is not required for the intracellular penetration of carbolfuchsin. This modification is referred to as the “cold” method. Another modification of the acid-fast stain that is used for identifying certain nonmycobacterial species is described and discussed in Part III, Section 14. When the acid-fast–stained smear is read with 1000× magnification, acid-fast–positive organisms stain red. Depending on the type of counterstain used (e.g., methylene blue or malachite green), other microorganisms, host cells, and debris stain a blue to blue-green color (Figures 6-9 and 6-10).

Procedure 6-3   Acid Fast (Ziehl-Neelsen or Hot Method)

Procedure 6-4   Acid Fast (Kinyoun-Cold Method)

As with the Gram stain, the acid-fast stain is used to detect acid-fast bacteria (e.g., mycobacteria) directly in clinical specimens and provide preliminary identification information for suspicious bacteria grown in culture. Because mycobacterial infections are much less common than infections caused by other non–acid-fast bacteria, the acid-fast stain is only performed on specimens from patients highly suspected of having a mycobacterial infection. That is, Gram staining is a routine part of most bacteriology procedures, whereas acid-fast staining is reserved for specific situations. Similarly, the acid-fast stain is applied to bacteria grown in culture when mycobacteria are suspected based on other growth characteristics (for more information regarding identification of mycobacteria, see Chapter 43).

Phase Contrast Microscopy

Instead of using a stain to achieve the contrast necessary for observing microorganisms, altering microscopic techniques to enhance contrast offers another approach. Phase contrast microscopy utilizes beams of light passing through the specimen that are partially deflected by the different densities or thicknesses (i.e., refractive indices) of the microbial cells or cell structures in the specimen. The greater the refractive index of an object, the more the beam of light is slowed, which results in decreased light intensity. These differences in light intensity translate into differences that provide contrast. Therefore, phase microscopy translates differences in phases within the specimen into differences in light intensities that result in contrast among objects within the specimen being observed.

Smear preparations and permanent staining is used to visualize cellular structures from nonliving or dead microorganisms. Because staining is not part of phase contrast microscopy, this method offers the advantage of allowing observation of viable microorganisms. The method is not commonly used in most aspects of diagnostic microbiology, but it is used to identify medically important fungi grown in culture (for more information regarding the use of phase contrast microscopy for fungal identification, see Chapter 60).

Fluorescent Microscopy

Principle of Fluorescent Microscopy

Certain dyes, called fluors or fluorochromes, can be raised to a higher energy level after absorbing ultraviolet (excitation) light. When the dye molecules return to their normal, lower energy state, they release excess energy in the form of visible (fluorescent) light. This process is called fluorescence, and microscopic methods have been developed to exploit the enhanced contrast and detection that this phenomenon provides.

Figure 6-11 depicts diagrammatically the principle of fluorescent microscopy in which the excitation light is emitted from above (epifluorescence). An excitation filter passes light of the desired wavelength to excite the fluorochrome that has been used to stain the specimen. A barrier filter in the objective lens prevents the excitation wavelengths from damaging the eyes of the observer. When observed through the ocular lens, fluorescing objects appear brightly lit against a dark background.

The color of the fluorescent light depends on the dye and light filters used. For example, use of the fluorescent dyes acridine orange, auramine, and fluorescein isothiocyanate (FITC) requires blue excitation light, exciter filters that select for light in the 450- to 490-λ wavelength range and a barrier filter for 515-λ. Calcofluor white, on the other hand, requires violet excitation light, an exciter filter that selects for light in the 355- to 425-λ wavelength range and a barrier filter for 460-λ. Which dye is used often depends on which organism suspected and the fluorescent method used. The intensity of the contrast obtained with fluorescent microscopy is an advantage it has over the use of chromogenic dyes (e.g., crystal violet and safranin of the Gram stain) and light microscopy.

Staining Techniques for Fluorescent Microscopy

Based on the composition of the fluorescent stain reagents, fluorescent staining techniques may be divided into two general categories: fluorochroming, in which a fluorescent dye is used alone, and immunofluorescence, in which fluorescent dyes have been linked (conjugated) to specific antibodies. The principal differences between these two methods are outlined in Figure 6-12.

Fluorochroming

In fluorochroming a direct chemical interaction occurs between the fluorescent dye and a component of the bacterial cell; this interaction is the same as occurs with the stains used in light microscopy. The difference is that use of a fluorescent dye enhances contrast and amplifies the observer’s ability to detect stained cells tenfold greater than would be observed by light microscopy. For example, a minimum concentration of at least 105 organisms per milliliter of specimen is required for visualization by light microscopy, whereas by fluorescent microscopy that number decreases to 104 per milliliter. The most common fluorochroming methods used in diagnostic microbiology include acridine orange stain, auramine-rhodamine stain, and calcofluor white stain.

Acridine Orange.

The fluorochrome acridine orange binds to nucleic acid. This staining method (see Procedure 6-4) can be used to confirm the presence of bacteria in blood cultures when Gram stain results are difficult to interpret or when the presence of bacteria is highly suspected but none are detected using light microscopy. Because acridine orange stains all nucleic acids, it is nonspecific. Therefore, all microorganisms and host cells will stain and give a bright orange fluorescence. Although this stain can be used to enhance detection, it does not discriminate between gram-negative and gram-positive bacteria. The stain is also used for detection of cell wall–deficient bacteria (e.g., mycoplasmas) grown in culture that are incapable of retaining the dyes used in the Gram stain (Figure 6-13) (see Procedure 6-5 on the Evolve site).

Auramine-Rhodamine.

The waxy mycolic acids in the cell walls of mycobacteria have an affinity for the fluorochromes auramine and rhodamine. As shown in Figure 6-14, these dyes will nonspecifically bind to nearly all mycobacteria. The mycobacterial cells appear bright yellow or orange against a greenish background. This fluorochroming method can be used to enhance detection of mycobacteria directly in patient specimens and for initial characterization of cells grown in culture.

Immunofluorescence

As discussed in Chapter 3, antibodies are molecules that have high specificity for interacting with microbial antigens. That is, antibodies specific for an antigen characteristic of a particular microbial species will only combine with that antigen. Therefore, if antibodies are conjugated (chemically linked) to a fluorescent dye, the resulting dye-antibody conjugate can be used to detect, or “tag,” specific microbial agents (see Figure 6-12). When “tagged,” the microorganisms become readily detectable by fluorescent microscopy. Thus, immunofluorescence combines the amplified contrast provided by fluorescence with the specificity of antibody-antigen binding.

This method is used to directly examine patient specimens for bacteria that are difficult or slow to grow (e.g., Legionella spp., Bordetella pertussis, and Chlamydia trachomatis) or to identify organisms already grown in culture. FITC, which emits an intense, apple green fluorescence, is the fluorochrome most commonly used for conjugation to antibodies (Figure 6-15). Immunofluorescence is also used in virology (Chapter 66) and to some extent in parasitology (Chapter 47).

Fluorescent in situ hybridization using peptide nucleic acid probes is a powerful technique used in the clinical laboratory and is discussed in further detail in Chapter 8.

Two additional types of microscopy, dark-field microscopy and electron microscopy, are not commonly used to diagnose infectious diseases. However, because of their importance in the detection and characterization of certain microorganisms, they are discussed here.

Dark-Field Microscopy

Dark-field microscopy is similar to phase contrast microscopy in that it involves the alteration of microscopic technique rather than the use of dyes or stains to achieve contrast. By the dark-field method, the condenser does not allow light to pass directly through the specimen but directs the light to hit the specimen at an oblique angle (Figure 6-16, A). Only light that hits objects, such as microorganisms in the specimen, will be deflected upward into the objective lens for visualization. All other light that passes through the specimen will miss the objective, thus making the background a dark field.

This method has greatest utility for detecting certain bacteria directly in patient specimens that, because of their thin dimensions, cannot be seen by light microscopy and, because of their physiology, are difficult to grow in culture. Dark-field microscopy is used to detect spirochetes, the most notorious of which is the bacterium Treponema pallidum, the causative agent of syphilis (for more information regarding spirochetes, see Chapter 46). As shown in Figure 6-16, B, spirochetes viewed using dark-field microscopy will appear extremely bright against a black field. The use of dark-field microscopy in diagnostic microbiology has decreased with the advent of reliable serologic techniques for the diagnosis of syphilis.

Electron Microscopy

The electron microscope uses electrons instead of light to visualize small objects and, instead of lenses, the electrons are focused by electromagnetic fields and form an image on a fluorescent screen, like a television screen. Because of the substantially increased resolution this technology allows, magnifications in excess of 100,000× compared with the 1000× magnification provided by light microscopy are achieved.

Electron microscopes are of two general types: the transmission electron microscope (TEM) and the scanning electron microscope (SEM). TEM passes the electron beam through objects and allows visualization of internal structures. SEM uses electron beams to scan the surface of objects and provides three-dimensional views of surface structures (Figure 6-17). These microscopes are powerful research tools, and many new morphologic features of bacteria, bacterial components, fungi, viruses, and parasites have been discovered using electron microscopy. However, because an electron microscope is a major capital investment and is not needed for the laboratory diagnosis of most infectious diseases (except for certain viruses and microsporidian parasites), few laboratories employ this method.

Share this: