Rheumatoid Arthritis: Conservative Surgical Procedures Open/Arthroscopic Synovectomy

Published on 17/04/2015 by admin

Filed under Surgery

Last modified 17/04/2015

Print this page

rate 1 star rate 2 star rate 3 star rate 4 star rate 5 star
Your rating: none, Average: 0 (0 votes)

This article have been viewed 1581 times

Chapter 42 Rheumatoid Arthritis

Conservative Surgical Procedures Open/Arthroscopic Synovectomy

Background/aetiology

Recent advances in medical management (especially the anti-tumour necrosis factor (TNF) α drugs including etanercept (Enbrel), infliximab (Remicade) and adalimumab (Humira)) have significantly slowed the rate of disease progression and therefore dramatically reduced the number of patients presenting with severe rheumatoid joint deformity and destruction.2 Consequently early detection of the disease and medical intervention where appropriate have become a priority.

The presentation of rheumatoid arthritis is extremely variable, with systemic symptoms sometimes complicating the picture. When joint symptoms predominate it is often a symmetrical polyarthritis. Certainly, the hands and wrists are the most frequently affected joints, with the elbow being involved in 20–60% of cases.1 Despite this variable presentation, joint involvement in rheumatoid arthritis is always characterized by inflammation and synovial hypertrophy.3 Treatment should be tailored to the pathology as it progresses through the relatively predictable radiographic Larsen stages of disease4 (Fig. 42.1). Put simply, the inflammation and synovial thickening lead to effusion, cartilage breakdown, erosions, nodules and capsulo-ligamentous thinning.

Initially alternative causes of pain, effusion and swelling in the elbow must be excluded, such as septic arthritis, posttrauma, gout and even osteoarthritis. In the earlier stages of disease the diagnosis can be difficult, especially in rheumatoid monoarthritis or pauci-articular rheumatoid arthritis, and a synovial biopsy may be desirable. Arthroscopy facilitates diagnostic biopsy, with less morbidity in experienced hands than an open procedure.5

Intraoperative findings reveal thick, villous synovium with or without rice bodies. The exudate covers the native articular cartilage from the margins, destroying the smooth edges of the cartilage and reducing the joint space.6 The often purulent joint effusion leads to friable articular cartilage in the centre of the joint, and as the elbow has a high level of constraint, this often leads to flaps of cartilage catching and/or locking the elbow as it extends. This, in addition to loose body formation, results in the common presentation of extension loss with anterior capsular tightness.

Classifications based on clinical presentation (Mayo Clinic Performance Index) and/or radiographic appearance (Mayo Clinic radiographic classification, Larsen Dale and Eek classification5) (Table 42.1) have been published by Morrey and Adams7 (as well as the elbow functional assessment (EFA) scale8 and others), but no single classification covers the variety of clinical problems produced by rheumatoid disease in the elbow.

Table 42.1 Mayo Clinic classification of the rheumatoid elbow

Grade Description
I No radiographic abnormalities except periarticular osteopenia with accompanying soft tissue swelling. Mild to moderate synovitis is generally present
II Mild to moderate joint space reduction with minimal or no architectural distortion. Recalcitrant synovitis that cannot be managed with non-steroidal antiinflammatory medications alone
III Variable reduction in joint space with or without cyst formation. Architectural alteration, such as thinning of the olecranon, or resorption of the trochlea or capitellum. Synovitis is variable and may be quiescent
IV Extensive articular damage with loss of subchondral bone and subluxation or ankylosis of the joint. Synovitis may be minimal

From Kauffman JI, Chen AL, Stuchin S, et al. Surgical management of the rheumatoid elbow. J Am Acad Orthop Surg 2003;11:100–108; data originally from Morrey BF, Adams RA. Semiconstrained arthroplasty for the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis of the elbow. J Bone Joint Surg (Am) 1992;74:479–490.

Presentation

Investigation

Imaging

The most reliable radiological classification for rheumatoid arthritis of the elbow is the Larson classification (Fig. 42.1). Recent advances in computed tomography (CT) have led to excellent quality three-dimensional (3D) images of the elbow to localize sites of impingement, and also to examine congruity of the joint. Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is, however, the investigation of choice for assessing synovitis. The presence of fluid can be distinguished from boggy synovitis, and the sites of maximum involvement can help preoperative planning and decision making.11 Ultrasound is of value when observing early synovitis and cysts, and is particularly useful when plotting the course of the radial nerve prior to surgery.12

Treatment options

Aims of these options

Surgical treatment of the elbow is used for several clinical purposes:

Table 42.2 Procedural treatment options

Arthroscopic procedures Arthroscopic synovial biopsy
Arthroscopic synovectomy
Arthroscopic capsular release
Arthroscopic radial head resection
Open procedures  
Lateral or Kocher approach Synovectomy
Synovectomy and capsulectomy
Synovectomy/capsulectomy and radial head excision
Posterior interosseous nerve release and excision of bursa
Posterior approach Olecranon nodule
Olecranon bursa ± spur
‘OK’ procedure
Medial approach Ulnar nerve release/transposition
Medial capsular release
Universal incision (posterior)  
All of the above Total elbow arthroplasty

Surgical techniques of typical conservative surgical procedures

Elbow arthroscopy

Technique

Elbow arthroscopy can be performed in either a supine, prone or lateral decubitus position. The preferred technique is in a lateral position between upright posts, allowing the non-dependent elbow to be flexed to 90° without undue stress being exerted on the shoulder. A small diameter ‘L’ bar is used to rest the arm over, and a tourniquet is positioned high on the arm. The use of TED stockings, adequate head and neck protection, and care for the contralateral arm (which is placed across the chest) is essential.

A series of protective techniques is highlighted to minimize the risk to local nerves, and in particular the posterior interosseous branch of the radial nerve.

The preferred sequence is to begin with an anterolateral portal and examination of the anterior compartment. Next, a medial portal is established from inside out. With the latter the ulnar nerve is at risk, particularly if it has previously been transposed, or is prone to subluxation and, as such, care must be taken. A power shaver is then introduced through a cannula and a synovectomy of the anterior compartment undertaken. Again care must be taken as the median and, particularly, the radial nerve are in close proximity to the capsule.

If a capsulectomy is required then the safest technique is to release it off the humerus superiorly. Capsulectomy on the medial side of the joint is achieved by shaving to the layer of brachialis, which protects the median nerve. A retractor facilitates this by elevating the ‘at-risk’ structures during shaving.13 Laterally, the radial nerve can lie on the capsule and be in immediate danger when an anterior release is being undertaken; again use of a retractor may be helpful.

A curved narrow osteotome is then introduced medially which if required allows excision of the coronoid osteophyte. This may, however, produce a cartilage ledge on the articulating surface of the coronoid which must be resected manually (or with power) to prevent recurrence. Finally, the humeral articulating margin on the radial side often produces a ledge of bone which requires resection using a power burr to prevent radial head impingement.

The posterolateral portal is then established. This portal is used to visualize both the olecranon (posterior) fossa, and the posterolateral gutter posterior to the radial head. A switching stick is then used to approach each area respectively before sliding the arthroscopic cannula to this section of the joint.

Loose bodies often migrate to the posterolateral gutter. An accessory portal distal to the scope portal allows retrieval of these, and also access to shave any synovium within the gutter. An inflamed radiocapitellar plica is often present and can be removed at this point. Any loose cartilaginous attachments are also removed. On the lateral side it is not uncommon to see bone-on-bone contact between the radial head and capitellum. However, this may not necessarily be symptomatic and as such a decision to resect the radial head should not be made on the arthroscopic appearances alone, but on the clinical presentation of pain on the radial side of the elbow, particularly on pronosupination.

Attention is then turned to the olecranon fossa, where via a trans triceps portal a thorough synovectomy of the posterior synovium can be undertaken. The only risk here is from shaving outside the capsule over the medial gutter, with the close proximity of the ulnar nerve. If secondary osteoarthritic spurs are present, the impingement is usually not