Regulation of the Immune Response

Published on 18/02/2015 by admin

Filed under Allergy and Immunology

Last modified 22/04/2025

Print this page

rate 1 star rate 2 star rate 3 star rate 4 star rate 5 star
Your rating: none, Average: 0 (0 votes)

This article have been viewed 3235 times

Chapter 11 Regulation of the Immune Response

Summary

Many factors govern the outcome of any immune response. These include the antigen itself, its dose and route of administration, and the genetic background of the individual responding to antigenic challenge. A variety of control mechanisms serve to restore the immune system to a resting state when the response to a given antigen is no longer required.

The APC has an important effect on the immune response through its ability to provide co-stimulation to T cells and by the production of cytokines and chemokines that influence both the nature and make-up of the ensuing reponse. In addition, APC heterogeneity aids in the promotion of different modes of immune response.

T cells regulate the immune response. Cytokine production by T cells influences the type of immune response elicited by antigen. CD4+ T cells can differentiate into several effector phenotypes such as TH1, TH2 or TH17. These subsets play important roles in the protection of the host against a diversity of pathogen challenges. Regulatory T cells may belong to the CD4 or CD8 subpopulations. They may inhibit responses via a variety of mechanisms such as via cell-to-cell contact or by the production of the anti-inflammatory cytokines IL-10 and TGFβ.

Immunoglobulins can influence the immune response. They may act positively, through the formation of immune complexes, or negatively, by reducing antigenic challenge or by feedback inhibition of B cells.

Selective migration of lymphocyte subsets to different sites can modulate the local type of immune response because different TH subsets respond to different sets of chemokines.

The neuroendocrine system influences immune responses. Cells from both systems share similar ligands and receptors, which permit cross-interactions between them. Corticosteroids in particular downregulate TH1 responses and macrophage activation.

Genetic factors influence the immune system and include both MHC-linked and non-MHC-linked genes. They affect the level of immune response and susceptibility to infection.

Ideally, an immune response is mounted quickly to clear away a pathogenic challenge with the minimum of collateral damage and then the system is returned to a resting state once the antigen is eliminated. The immune response, like many other biological systems, is therefore subject to a variety of control mechanisms. Additional mechanisms help regulate the levels of immunopathology that are often a necessary sacrifice for pathogen elimination. An insufficient immune response can result in an individual being overwhelmed by infection. An inappropriate, or over vigorous immune response can lead to high levels of immunopathology or even autoimmunity (see Chapter 20). The balance between these two is therefore critical.

At its most basic, an effective immune response is an outcome of the interplay between antigen and a network of immunologically competent cells. The nature of the immune response, both qualitatively and quantitatively, is determined by many factors, including:

Specific antibodies may also modulate the immune response to an antigen.

Regulation by antigen

T cells and B cells are activated by antigen after effective engagement of their antigen-specific receptors together with appropriate co-stimulation. Repeated antigen exposure is required to maintain T and B cell proliferation, and during an effective immune response there is often a dramatic expansion of specifically reactive effector cells.

At the end of an immune response, reduced antigen exposure results in a reduced expression of IL-2 and its receptor, leading to apoptosis of the antigen-specific T cells. The majority of antigen-specific cells therefore die at the end of an immune response leaving a minor population of long-lived T and B cells to survive and give rise to the memory population.

Antigen route of administration can determine whether an immune response occurs

The route of administration of antigen has been shown to influence the immune response:

For example, rodents that have been fed ovalbumin do not respond effectively to a subsequent challenge with the corresponding antigen. This phenomenon may have some therapeutic value in allergy. Studies have shown that oral administration of a T cell epitope of the Der p1 allergen of house dust mite (Dermatophagoides pteronyssimus) could tolerize to the whole antigen. The potential mechanisms of such tolerance induction include anergy, immune deviation, and the generation of regulatory T cells that act through the production of cytokines such as TGFβ and IL-10.

Similar observations have been made when antigen is given as an aerosol. Studies in mice have shown that aerosol administration of an encephalitogenic peptide of myelin basic protein (MBP) inhibits the development of experimental allergic encephalomyelitis (EAE) that would normally be induced by a conventional (subcutaneous) administration of the peptide (Fig. 11.2).

A clear example of how different routes of administration affect the outcome of the immune response is provided by studies of infection with lymphocytic choriomeningitis virus (LCMV). Mice primed subcutaneously with peptide in incomplete Freund’s adjuvant develop immunity to LCMV. However, if the same peptide is repeatedly injected intraperitoneally the animal becomes tolerized and cannot clear the virus (Fig. 11.3).

Regulation by the antigen presenting cell

The nature of the APC initially presenting the antigen may determine whether immune responsiveness or tolerance ensues. Effective activation of T cells requires the expression of co-stimulatory molecules on the surface of the APC. Therefore, presentation by dendritic cells or activated macrophages that express high levels of MHC class II molecules, in addition to co-stimulatory molecules, results in highly effective T cell activation. Furthermore, the interaction of CD40L on activated T cells with CD40 on dendritic cells is important for the high-level production of IL-12 necessary for the generation of an effective TH1 response.

If antigen is presented to T cells by a ‘non-professional’ APC that is unable to provide co-stimulation, unresponsiveness, or immune deviation results. For example, when naive T cells are exposed to antigen by resting B cells they fail to respond and become tolerized. Experimental observations illustrate this point.

Neonatal animals are more susceptible to tolerance induction. Therefore mice administered MBP in incomplete Freund’s adjuvant during the neonatal period are resistant to the induction of EAE. This is due to the development of a dominant TH2 response (see Fig. 11.1). The prior TH2 response to MBP prevents the development of the TH1/TH17 pathological response, which mediates EAE. This effect is not restricted to neonatal animals. Indeed, adult Lewis rats can be tolerized to the induction of EAE by similar administration of MBP in incomplete Freund’s adjuvant.

Adjuvants may facilitate immune responses by inducing the expression of high levels of MHC and co-stimulatory molecules on APCs. Furthermore, their ability to activate Langerhans’ cells leads to the migration of these skin dendritic cells to the local draining lymph nodes where effective T cell activation can occur.

The importance of dendritic cells in initiating a cytotoxic T lymphocyte (CTL) response is illustrated by experiments showing that newborn female mice injected with male spleen cells fail to develop a CTL response to the male antigen, H-Y. However, if male dendritic cells are injected into female newborn mice, a good H-Y-specific CTL response develops.

T cell regulation of the immune response

Differentiation into CD4+ TH subsets is an important step in selecting effector functions

A single TH cell precursor is able to differentiate into a variety of phenotypes, the best characterized and understood being the TH1 and TH2 phenotypes. A recently-described subset, TH17 (producing IL-17A and IL-17F), is proposed to have important roles in mucosal immunity to certain bacteria and fungi. The differentiation fates of TH cells are crucial to the generation of effective immunity; factors that may influence the differentiation of TH cells include:

The cytokine balance controls T cell differentiation

IL-12 is a potent initial stimulus for IFNγ production by T cells and natural killer (NK) cells and therefore promotes TH1 differentiation. IFNα, a cytokine produced early during viral infection, induces IL-12 and can also switch cells from a TH2 to a TH1 profile.

By contrast, early production of IL-4 favors the generation of TH2 cells. NKT cells, specialized macrophages (called alternatively activated macrophages) and basophils have all been suggested to be early producers of IL-4.

Very recent studies have suggested the existence of a novel TH2 promoting innate cell population present in gut associated lymphoid tissues (GALT). These cells respond rapidly to the cytokines IL-25 and IL-33, which can be produced by epithelial cells, in response to antigens derived from helminths or allergens. These cells have been reported to produce large amounts of IL-5 and IL-13, with lesser amounts of IL-4.

TH17 cells in mice develop in the presence of TGFβ with IL-6 or IL-21 and share an interesting reciprocal developmental relationship with inducible Tregs, which is discussed in more detail below.

Cytokines from the various TH subsets can cross-regulate each other’s development. Thus, cross-regulation of TH subsets has been demonstrated whereby IFNγ secreted by TH1 cells can inhibit the responsiveness of TH2 cells; also IL-17A can inhibit the development of TH1 responses (Fig. 11.4) whereas IL-10 produced by TH2 cells downregulates B7 and IL-12 expression by APCs, which in turn inhibits TH1 activation.

The TH subset balance is modulated not only by the level of expression of cytokines such as IL-12 or IL-4, but also by expression of cytokine receptors. For instance, the high-affinity IL-12R is composed of two chains, β1 and β2, with both chains being constitutively expressed on TH1 cells. TH1, TH2, and TH17 cells express the β1 chain, but expression of the β2 chain is induced by IFNγ and inhibited by IL-4 (Fig. 11.5). Therefore cytokines reinforce the lineage decisions of the various TH subsets at least in part by controlling the expression of lineage specific receptors.

An immune response therefore tends to settle into a TH1, TH2 or TH17 type of response, but immune responses are not always strongly polarized in this way particularly in humans. It is conceptually useful to consider TH1 and TH2 as extremes on a scale, and TH1 and TH2 responses do play different roles both in immune defence and immunopathology. However it is important to appreciate that other TH subsets such as TH17 do exist and that the well-established TH1/TH2 paradigm is an oversimplification. It should also be noted that some recent studies have suggested that many TH subsets are in fact not terminally differentiated; and when given the right signals; some TH cells can undergo conversion to another phenotype.

TH cell subsets determine the type of immune response

It is clear that:

TH1 cytokines including IFNγ, TNFβ, and IL-2 also promote:

TH2 clones are typified by production of IL-4, IL-5, IL-9, IL-10 and IL-13 (see Fig. 11.4). These cells provide optimal help for humoral immune responses biased towards:

TH17 cell cytokines include IL-17A, IL-17F, TNFα, and IL-22. Since many stromal cells express receptors for these cytokines the effects of TH17 cells can promote inflammation. In addition:

Therefore, in essence, TH1 cells are associated with cell-mediated inflammatory reactions and TH2 cells are associated with strong antibody and allergic responses. TH17 cells appear important in defense against certain infections, particularly at mucosal surfaces.

Treg differentiation is induced by Foxp3

The immunosuppressive functions of CD4+ cells were initially observed by adoptively transferring T cells depleted of CD25+ cells into immunodeficient mice. This resulted in multiorgan autoimmunity suggesting that CD25+ cells play an important role in preventing self-reactivity. When the CD25+ T cells were replaced, autoimmune disease was prevented.

Comparison of CD4+CD25+ Tregs with naive and activated CD4+ T cells shows that regulatory cells selectively express Foxp3, a member of the forkhead/winged helix transcription factors (Fig. 11.7) essential for the development and function of CD4+CD25+ Tregs. Mutations in the Foxp3 gene cause immune dysregulation, polyendocrinopathy enteropathy, X-linked syndrome (IPEX). Individuals with this disease have increased autoimmune and inflammatory diseases.

The importance of Foxp3 in the development of CD4+CD25+ Tregs was underlined following transfection of Foxp3 into naive T cells (which do not express Foxp3). This increased expression of CD25 and induced suppressor function.

Evidence for the origin of these naturally occurring Tregs came from the finding that mice thymectomized at three days old developed multi-organ autoimmune disease. Further analysis revealed that CD4+ CD8 thymocytes begin expressing Foxp3 at day 2 after birth and after that CD4+ Foxp3+ cells accumulate in the periphery. Therefore naturally occurring Tregs are educated in the thymus during thymic selection. CD4+CD25+ Foxp3+ Tregs constitute 5–10% of peripheral CD4+ T cells in both mice and humans, and whilst athymic mice have severely reduced levels of Tregs, it is clear that Foxp3+ Tregs can arise in the periphery. These so called induced Tregs have been extensively studied in vitro. If naive CD4+ T cells are stimulated in the presence of TGFβ then many cells start expressing Foxp3. The additional presence of retinoic acid is thought to accentuate the conversion of naive CD4+ T cells into Foxp3+ Tregs.

Interestingly, it is thought that induced Treg populations and inflammatory TH17 cells share a reciprocal developmental pathway.image

NK and NKT cells produce immunoregulatory cytokines and chemokines

NK cells make cytokines and chemokines and therefore play an important role in the innate immune response to infections and tumors.

The production of immunoregulatory cytokines and chemokines at early stages in the immune response influences the characteristics of the subsequent adaptive immune reaction and can, therefore, affect the overall outcome of the immune response.

NK cells play a key role in the early immune response to intracellular pathogens, largely through their production of IFNγ, which activates macrophages and facilitates differentiation of TH1 cells.

NK cell activity itself is induced by a variety of cytokines including:

NK cells in turn are negatively regulated by cytokines such as IL-10 and TGFβ.

NK T cells produce cytokines when their TCR engages glycolipids in association with CD1d. It has been suggested that these cells play an immunoregulatory role in the control of autoimmunity, parasite infection, and tumor cell growth.

T cells secreting IFNγ are able to induce NK cell activation, increasing both NK proliferation and cytotoxicity. They are capable of making both TH1-type (IFNγ), TH2-type (IL-4), and TH17 (IL-17A) cytokines depending on the cytokines present in the microenvironment when they are activated (Fig. 11.11). These early sources of cytokine are important in influencing the nature of the T cell response.

Deficiencies of NK T cells have also been reported in animal and human autoimmune diseases, highlighting their regulatory roles. For example, non obese diabetic (NOD) mice have a deficit in NK T cells and injection of NK T cells into these mice prevents the spontaneous development of autoimmune diabetes. Human examples where NK T deficiencies may play a role include:

Regulation of the immune response by immunoglobulins

Antibody has been shown to exert feedback control on the immune response.

Passive administration of IgM antibody together with an antigen specifically enhances the immune response to that antigen, whereas IgG antibody suppresses the response. This was originally shown with polyclonal antibodies, but has since been confirmed using monoclonal antibodies (Fig. 11.12).

The ability of passively administered antibody to enhance or suppress the immune response has certain clinical consequences and applications:

The mechanisms by which antibody modulates the immune response are not completely defined. In the case of IgM-enhancing plaque-forming cells, there are thought to be two possible interpretations:

IgG antibody can regulate specific IgG synthesis

IgG can suppress antibody responses in a number of ways.

Immune complexes may enhance or suppress immune responses

One of the ways in which antibody (either IgM or IgG) might act to modulate the immune response involves an Fc-dependent mechanism and immune complex formation with antigen.

Immune complexes can inhibit or augment the immune response (Fig. 11.15). By activating complement, immune complexes may become localized via interactions with CR2 on follicular dendritic cells (FDCs). This could facilitate the immune response by maintaining a source of antigen.

CR2 is also expressed on B cells and, as co-ligation of CR2 with membrane IgM has been shown to activate B cells, immune complex interaction with CR2 of the B cell–co-receptor complex and membrane Ig might lead to an enhanced specific immune response.

Apoptosis in the immune system

Apoptosis is a cellular clearance mechanism through which homeostasis is maintained.

Unlike cell damage-induced death (i.e. necrosis), which can trigger immune responses, apoptosis maintains intracellular structures within the cell. Apoptopic cells undergo nuclear fragmentation and the condensation of cytoplasm, plasma membranes, and organelles into apoptopic bodies. Apoptopic cells are rapidly phagocytosed by macrophages, which prevents the release of toxic cellular components into tissues, so avoiding immune responses to the dead cells.

Apoptosis is:

Following resolution of an immune response the majority of antigen-specific cells die by apoptosis. This ensures that no unwanted effector cells remain and also maintains a constant number of cells in the immune system.

A small number of cells are prevented from undergoing apoptosis and enter the memory T cell pool.

Apoptosis is controlled by a number of factors in the cell and depends on expression of the death trigger molecule CD95 (Fas). Deficiencies in the FAS/ FASL pathway can give rise to lymphoproliferative disorders with autoimmune manifestations.

Expression of the anti-apoptotic molecule Bcl-2 makes cells more resistant to cell death. Memory T cells generally express high levels of Bcl-2, which may contribute to the rescue of memory populations from apoptosis.

Different cell populations can express both pro- and anti-apoptotic molecules with the balance of these molecules determining whether a cell survives to participate in immune responses. Interestingly, at least in vitro, TH1 cells appear more susceptible to Fas induced apoptosis than TH2 or TH17 cells. The exact significance of this finding, however, remains to be determined.

Immune regulation by selective cell migration

The spatial and temporal production of chemokines by different cell types is an important mechanism of immune regulation. There is good evidence to suggest that the recruitment of TH1, TH2 and TH17 cells is differentially controlled, thereby ensuring the maintenance of locally polarized immune responses.

The expression of different chemokine receptors on TH1 cells (CXCR3 and CCR5), TH2 cells (CCR3, CCR4, CCR8), and TH17 (CCR6) allows chemotactic signals to produce the differential localization of T cell subsets to sites of inflammation (see Fig. 6.10).

Chemokines can be induced by cytokines released at sites of inflammation, so providing a mechanism for local reinforcement of particular types of response (Fig. 11.16). Once a response is established the T cells can induce further migration of appropriate effector cells. This is clearly illustrated in TH1 responses where the secondary production of CCL2, CCL3, CXCL10, and CCL5 serves to attract mononuclear phagocytes to the area of inflammation. Production of IL-17A can drive the expression of CCL20, the ligand for CCR6, recruiting more TH17 cells to the site of inflammation. The ability of cytokines such as TGFβ, IL-12, and IL-4 to influence chemokine or chemokine receptor expression provides a further level of control on cell migration or recruitment.

Immune responses do not normally occur at certain sites in the body such as the anterior chamber of the eye and the testes. These sites are called immune privileged.

The failure to evoke immune responses in these sites is partly due to the presence of inhibitory cytokines such as TGFβ and IL-10, which inhibit inflammatory responses. The presence of migration inhibition factor (MIF) in the anterior chamber of the eye also inhibits NK cell activity.

Neuroendocrine regulation of immune responses

It is now widely accepted that there is extensive cross-talk between the neuroendocrine and immune systems. Both systems share similar ligands and receptors that permit intra and inter-system communication. These networks of communication are deemed essential for normal physiological function and good health. For instance they play important roles in modulating the body’s response to stress, injury, disease and infection. The interconnections of the nervous, endocrine, and immune systems are depicted in (Fig. 11.17).

There are several routes by which the central nervous system and immune system can interact:

Lymphocytes express receptors for many hormones, neurotransmitters, and neuropeptides – expression and responsiveness vary between different lymphocyte and monocyte populations, such that the effect of different transmitters may vary in different circumstances.

Corticosteroids, endorphins, and enkephalins, all of which may be released during stress, are immunosuppressive in vivo. Such hormones can have strong effects on lymphocyte proliferation. In particular stress hormones can bring about the reactivation of latent viral infections. The precise in vitro effects of endorphins vary depending on the system and on the doses used – some levels are suppressive and others enhance immune functions.

It is certain, however, that corticosteroids act as a major feedback control on immune responses. It has been found that lymphocytes themselves can respond to corticotrophin releasing factor to generate their own adrenocorticotrophic hormone (ACTH), which in turn induces corticosteroid release. Corticosteroids:

For example, the low levels of plasma corticosteroids found in Lewis rats are believed to contribute to their susceptibility to a variety of induced TH1-type autoimmune conditions.

This interplay between the neuroendocrine system and the immune system is bidirectional. Cytokines, in particular IL-1 and IL-6 produced by T cells, neurons, glial cells and cells in the pituitary and adrenal glands, are potent stimulators of ACTH production through their effect on corticotrophin releasing hormone (CRH).

Gender based differences in immune responses also occur. Immune cells have been shown to express receptors for estrogens and androgens, so it is likely that circulating levels of these hormones can affect their function. It is noted that, during reproductive years, females demonstrate more pronounced humoral and cellular immunity than males.

Some autoimmune diseases also show a gender bias. The systemic autoimmune disease systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) is ten times more common in females than males. Additionally, in animal models of autoimmunity, female NOD mice develop a much higher incidence of diabetes than males (though interestingly this sex bias is not observed in humans) and male BXSB mice have a spontaneously higher incidence of an-SLE like syndrome when compared to females. This provides some evidence for the effects of sex hormones on immune function.

Genetic influences on the immune response

Familial patterns of susceptibility to infectious agents suggest that resistance or susceptibility might be an inherited characteristic. Such patterns of resistance and susceptibility also occur in autoimmune diseases.

Many genes are involved in governing susceptibility or resistance to disease and the disease is said to be under polygenic control. Considerable advances have been made in mapping and identifying the genes governing the response to some diseases as a result of:

In most cases these studies have led to the identification of potential candidate genes, but their real role in disease susceptibility remains to be clarified. In other cases single mutations in genes of known function have been found and the mechanism by which they contribute to disease identified.

MHC-linked genes control the response to infections

MHC-linked genes (see Chapter 5) are involved in the immune response to infectious agents. In some cases the gene involved is the MHC gene itself, but in others it can be a gene linked to the MHC.

Many non-MHC genes also modulate immune responses

Some genes outside the MHC region also govern the immune response. However, these genes are generally less polymorphic than MHC genes and contribute less to variations in disease susceptibility. Nevertheless, their effects are found in autoimmune diseases, allergy, and infection. For example:

Non-MHC-linked genes affect susceptibility to infection

Macrophages have a key role in the immune system. Therefore genes regulating their activity may determine the outcome of many immune responses.

The Lsh/Ity/Bcg gene provides a good example of such genetic control of macrophage function. This gene governs the early response to infection with Leishmania donovani, Salmonella typhimurium, Mycobacterium bovis, Mycobacterium lepraemurium, and Mycobacterium intracellulare. Its influence is on the early phase of macrophage priming and activation, and it has wide-ranging effects, including:

Recent congenic studies have identified the natural resistance-associated macrophage protein-1 (Nramp1) as the Bcg gene. Nramp1 encodes a membrane protein with homology to known transport proteins and functions as a divalent metal iron transporter (iron and manganese), at the phagasomal membrane. The functionality of this protein is associated with an enhanced activity of proinflammatory pathways, notably iNOS induction, which may facilitate the killing of intracellular organisms.

The human homolog of the mouse gene Nramp (SLC11A1) has been cloned and several different alleles identified. Polymorphisms in this gene may contribute to resistance to tuberculosis in humans, though the data so far are not as convincing as in the mouse.

TLR4 polymorphisms, malaria and septic shock

Infectious agents exert a constant evolutionary pressure on the immune system. The pathogen recognition receptor TLR4 is an important sensor of gram-negative bacterial infections. Polymorphisms in this receptor can alter its ligand-binding site. Recently, a polymorphism in TLR4 (denoted as Asp299Gly) has been observed to have differential distributions in populations from Africa, Asia and Europe.

Analysis of the effect on TNF production by whole blood samples taken from individuals with wildtype TLR4 or the Asp299Gly TLR4 polymorphism (the ligand for TLR4) reveals a significant increase in TNF alpha production when samples are stimulated with LPS if the Asp299Gly allele is present (Fig. 11.w3).

image

Fig. 11.w3 Polymorphism in TLR4

Production of TNF alpha induced by LPS in individuals bearing the TLR4 Asp299Gly or wildtype haplotypes.

(Adapted from Ferwerda B, McCall MB, Alonso S, et al. Proc Nat Acad Sci 2007:104:16645–16650.)

The presence of the Asp299Gly allele is at a higher frequency in sub-saharan Africa and it appears it may have evolved as a protective allele against malaria, since although individuals with this allele have a higher parasitemia than controls, the incidence of cerebral malaria is lower. The presence of this allele, therefore, may increase the likelihood of disease survival.

High levels of pro inflammatory cytokines such as TNF alpha are thought to be deleterious during septic shock. The increased historical susceptibility to severe bacterial infections in Eurasia (e.g. plague, typhoid fever and secondary bacterial infections due to influenza) may make such an allele disadvantageous after migration from Africa. This allele may therefore have been eliminated due to the increased susceptibility to septic shock.

Polymorphisms in cytokine and chemokine genes affect susceptibility to infections

Polymorphisms in the genes encoding cytokine receptors have been shown to correlate with an increased susceptibility to:

The outcome of the mutation is dependent on which cytokine gene is affected.

For example, humans with:

Further examples are the mutations in the IFNγ receptor (IFNγR) or IL-12 receptor (IL-12R), which increase susceptibility to mycobacterial infection. A list of genetic defects that contribute to impaired immune responses is given in Figure 11.21.

Mutations in the cytokine promoters influence the levels of expression of cytokines. Polymorphisms such as these have been linked to certain autoimmune conditions and also to susceptibility to infections. For example, polymorphisms in the promoter region of the TNFα gene, which lies within the MHC, influence its level of expression through altered binding of the transcription factor OCT-1. One of these polymorphisms, commonly associated with cerebral malaria, results in high levels of TNF expression. This may lead to upregulation of intercellular adhesion molecule-1 (ICAM-1) on vascular endothelium, increased adherence of infected erythrocytes, and subsequent blockage of blood flow.

This polymorphism in the TNFα promoter has also been associated with:

Some genes involved in immune responses affect disease susceptibility, but do not affect immune responsiveness. For example, disease progression to AIDS has been shown to be associated with polymorphisms in the chemokine receptor gene-5 (CCR5).

CCR5 is a co-receptor used in the entry of macrophage-tropic strains of HIV-1 into cells. A mutation that inactivates this receptor is found in some individuals of European origin, but is rare in populations of Asian or sub-Saharan African descent. Individuals homozygous for this CCR5 mutation are very resistant to HIV-1 infection. In this case resistance is related to the reduced primary spread of the virus rather than an enhanced immune response against it.

Further reading

Agnello D., Lankford C.S., Bream J., et al. Cytokines and transcription factors that regulate T helper cell differentiation: new players and new insights. J Clin Immunol. 2003;23:147–161.

Bettelli E., Carrier Y., Gao W., et al. Reciprocal developmental pathways for the generation of pathogenic effector TH17 and regulatory T cells. Nature. 2006;441:235–238.

Blalock J.E. Shared ligands and receptors as a molecular mechanism for communication between immune and neuroendocrine systems. Ann N Y Acad Sci. 1994;741:292–298.

Chess L., Jiang H. Resurrecting CD8+ suppressor cells. Nat Immunol. 2004;5:569–571.

Cua D.J., Tato D.M. Innate IL-17-producing cells: the sentinels of the immune system. Nat Rev Immunol. 2010;10:479–489.

Ferwerda B., McCall M.B., Alonso S., et al. TLR4 polymorphisms, infectious diseases, and evolutionary pressure during migration of modern humans. Proc Nat Acad Sci U S A. 2007;104:16645–16650.

Heymann B. Regulation of antibody responses via antibodies, complement, and Fc receptors. Annu Rev Immunol. 2000;18:709–738.

Korn T., Bettelli E., Oukka M., Kuchroo V.K. IL-17 and Th17 cells. Annu Rev Immunol. 2009;27:485–517.

Leonard W.J. Genetic effects on immunity. Curr Opin Immunol. 2000;12:465–467.

Metzler B., Wraith D.C. Inhibition of experimental autoimmune encephalomyelitis by inhalation but not oral administration of the encephalitogenic peptide: influence of MHC binding affinity. Int Immunol. 1993;5:1159–1165.

Mills K.H.G., McGuirk P. Antigen-specific regulatory T cells – their induction and role in infection. Semin Immunol. 2004;16:107–117.

Murphy K.M., Stockinger B. Effector T cell plasticity: flexibility in the face of changing circumstances. Nat Immunol. 2010;11:674–690.

Romagnani S. Th1/Th2 cells. Inflamm Bowel Dis. 1999;5:285–294.

Shevach E.M. Mechanisms of Foxp3+ T regulatory cell-mediated suppression. Immunity. 2009;30:636–645.

Taub D.D. Neuroendocrine Interactions in the Immune System. Cell Immunol. 2008;252:1–10.

Van der Vliet H.J.J., Molling J.W., von Blomberg B.M., et al. The immunoregulatory role of CD1d-restricted natural killer T cells in disease. Clin Immunol. 2004;112:8–23.

Zlotnik A., Yoshie O. Chemokines: a new classification system and their role in immunity. Immunity. 2000;12:121–127.