Quality of Care and Patient Safety

Published on 24/02/2015 by admin

Filed under Anesthesiology

Last modified 22/04/2025

Print this page

rate 1 star rate 2 star rate 3 star rate 4 star rate 5 star
Your rating: none, Average: 0 (0 votes)

This article have been viewed 1311 times

Chapter 43 Quality of Care and Patient Safety

Answers*

Basic principles

1. Nonmaleficence is a basic tenet of medical ethics based on the Latin primum non nocere, or “first, do no harm.” (746)

2. The Joint Commission National Patient Safety Goals are updated yearly, and for 2010 include the following:

3. In the authors’ opinion, (1) patient safety, (2) improved outcomes, and (3) improved patient satisfaction with their care constitutes the triad of excellence in clinical care. (747, Figure 41-1)

4. Quality of care includes not only the clinical care indicators, but also the measures of efficiency, such as timely starts, short turnaround times between cases, appropriate access for emergencies, and effective utilization of the ORs, equipment, and staff. (746-747)

5. The American Association of Clinical Directors has developed a Procedural Times Glossary to measure and compare OR efficiency benchmarks. The ASA also established the Anesthesia Quality Institute (AQI) in 2009 to establish standardized quality measures, promote research, and obtain useful data to improve the quality of patient care. (747)

Anesthesiology and patient safety

6. Anesthesiology has often been cited as an example of how a medical specialty has systematically improved patient safety. In 1954, Beecher and Todd’s review of mortality during anesthesia found a mortality rate of 1 in every 1561 operations, and was one of the first studies to scientifically identify and quantify risks associated with anesthesia. Patient safety efforts have included features on the anesthesia delivery systems used in patient care (e.g., Pin Index Systems), founding of the ASA Closed Claims Database in 1985, and establishment of the Anesthesia Patient Safety Foundation (APSF) also in 1985. (747)

7. Many of the features of the anesthesia machine, such as Pin Index Safety Systems, oxygen fail-safe controls, prevention of hypoxic mixtures, and elimination of hanging bellows, were developed to enhance patient safety by avoiding critical technical failures. (747)

8. In 1985 the ASA established the Closed Claims Database with the goal of reviewing closed malpractice claims to identify sources of technical failure and human error that lead to patient injury, and to then share this information with the anesthesia community. (747)

9. Initial findings from the Closed Claims Database found that most claims were due to unrecognized esophageal intubation or other reasons for inadequate oxygenation. This finding accelerated the requirement for pulse oximetry and capnography as standard monitors for patients undergoing general anesthesia. Several additional ASA task forces, such as the Postoperative Visual Loss Registry, have been established to further address concerns identified by analysis of the Closed Claims Database. Further analysis of problems identified by the Closed Claims Database has led the ASA to publish clinical practice recommendations such as the ASA Difficult Airway Algorithm. The ASA currently has 23 practice advisories available. (747-748)

10. The Anesthesia Patients Safety Foundation is an independent, nonprofit corporation with the goal that “no patient shall be harmed by anesthesia.” Board members include anesthesiologists, nurse anesthetists, equipment manufacturers, lawyers, and engineers. Its current mission statement identifies safety research and education, patient safety programs and campaigns, and national and international exchange of information and ideas as its continuing goals. Its quarterly newsletter is the most widely circulated anesthesia publication in the world, providing a forum to publicize advances in technology, as well as concerns regarding medications, patient issues, and common anesthesiology practices. (748)

11. Through the implementation of technical advances and practitioner education, mortality from anesthesia has improved to 1:250,000. However, as the population has aged and patients with more severe medical problems are undergoing surgery, mortality for the very ill is reported to be as frequent as 1:10,000 to 1:1500. (748)

Patient Safety, Medical Error, Adverse and Sentinel Events

12. Health care errors may be errors of commission (doing the wrong thing), omission (not doing the right thing), or execution (doing the right thing incorrectly). A defect in the delivery of care to a patient resulting in an unintended health care outcome is deemed a health care or medical error. (748)

13. An adverse event refers to any injury caused by medical care. Identifying something as an adverse event does not imply error, negligence, or poor quality of care. It simply indicates that an undesirable clinical outcome resulted from some aspect of diagnosis or therapy, not an underlying disease process. (748)

14. A sentinel event is an unexpected occurrence involving death or serious physical or psychological injury, or the risk thereof. Serious injury specifically includes loss of limb or function. The phrase “or the risk thereof” includes any process variation for which a recurrence would carry a significant chance of a serious adverse outcome. Such events are called “sentinel” because they signal the need for immediate investigation and response. (748)

15. From January 1995 through December 2009, The Joint Commission reviewed 6600 sentinel events; 68% of sentinel events included patient mortality. Among the 10 most frequently reported sentinel events were wrong site surgery (most common, 13.5%), operative/postoperative complication, medication error, and unintended retention of a foreign body. (748-749)

16. A Root Cause Analysis (RCA) is a structured process for identifying the causal or contributing factors underlying adverse events or critical incidents. (748-749)

17. The Institute of Medicine’s reports “To Err Is Human: Building a Better Health System” (November 1, 1999) and “Crossing the Quality Chasm: A New Health System for the 21st Century” (March 1, 2001) indicated that 98,000 patients in the United States die annually as a result of medical errors. (748-749)

18. NSQIP began at the Veterans Administration hospitals and has expanded through the American College of Surgeons to many private institutions. The NSQIP initiative endeavors to improve the delivery of medical care at a systems level rather than at an individual level and is credited with improving postoperative surgical mortality by up to 31% and morbidity by 45%. NSQIP has demonstrated that while obvious errors can be detected on the local (hospital) level, subtle systems errors or deficiencies cannot be appreciated without comparison to data from peer institutions. (749)

19. NSQIP has identified three important patient safety observations:

20. The checklist requires that practitioners should:

Preventing Wrong-Site Surgery

23. By definition, wrong-site surgery involves all surgical procedures performed on the wrong patient, wrong body part, wrong side of the body, or the wrong level of a correctly identified anatomic site. This includes anesthesia procedures such as regional or neuraxial blocks. (749)

24. According to The Joint Commission, the reports of wrong-site surgery or procedures are steadily increasing. The actual incidence of wrong-site surgery is unknown but is estimated to be 1:15,000 to 1:112,000. (749)

25. To prevent the occurrence of wrong-site surgery, The Joint Commission has issued a universal protocol which requires:

26. The process of “time-out” is when all the services involved in caring for the patient (surgery, anesthesiology, and nursing) pause before beginning a procedure to ensure that the correct patient is undergoing the correct procedure on the correct location and all the necessary imaging studies and equipment necessary to safely complete the procedure are available. The essential elements for a preprocedural “time-out” are:

Improved Communication

29. When a patient is transferred from the care of one practitioner to another, whether it is from floor nurse to the anesthesiologist in the operating room, anesthesiologist to postanesthesia care unit nurse, or within services from daytime team to an on-call team, structured systems to facilitate the transfer of vital patient information are essential to avoid errors. The Joint Commission has termed these transfers of patient care as “handoffs.” (750)

30. Originally developed for U.S. Navy communications, situation-background-assessment-recommendation (SBAR) has been adapted by many health care organizations and is internationally accepted as an effective communication regarding a change in a patient’s condition either from nurse to physician or among physicians. The elements of SBAR communication are:

Situation: The notifying health care practitioner identifies the patient and the problem or the change in the patient’s condition.

Background: Relevant background information specific to the situation. For example, this could include the patient’s diagnosis, his mental status, current vital signs, complaints, pain level, and physical assessment findings.

Assessment: This step of the communication provides the practitioner with the opportunity to offer an analysis of the problem or to convey more extensive data about the patient, such as changes from prior assessments.

Recommendation: What the practitioner believes would help resolve the situation or what is the desired response. (750)

Medication Safety

31. Medication reconciliation refers to the process by which the medications the patient is on preoperatively are reviewed for any possible adverse reactions with any medications he or she might receive intraoperatively or postoperatively. (750)

32. Medication reconciliation should occur whenever the patient is admitted, transferred to another unit or service, or is discharged home. (750)

33. Medications should not be drawn into syringes until immediately prior to patient use and the syringes must be labeled with the drug name, drug concentration, and time medication is drawn up. Anesthesiologists have long adopted the use of color-coded labels to distinguish among different classes of medications in an effort to avoid medication administration errors. (750)

34. The Joint Commission recommends against the labeling of empty syringes in anticipation of future medication preparation since this does not obviate drawing the incorrect medication into a differently labeled syringe. A clarification on this recommendation was sought by the ASA, in response to which The Joint Commission will remove it from the FAQ section of their website. However, they have stopped short of a clear statement of reversing it. (750)

35. Additional requirements in ensuring medication safety are avoiding the use of abbreviations with regard to drug name and unit of dose. The use of decimal points followed by a trailing zero is also to be avoided while a zero must be placed in front of a decimal point to avoid dosing errors. Finally, the Do Not Use List prohibits the use of “u” for units, “iu” for international units, and Q.D. or Q.O.D. for daily or every other day dosing. (751)

36. Care must be taken to avoid using vials of drugs from manufacturers that look alike. If look-alike drugs cannot be avoided, such vials should not be placed near one another in any pharmacy drawer. In addition, TALLman lettering, such as EPInephrine may be used to distinguish it from EPHedrine. (751)

Reducing hospital-acquired infection

Surgical Care Improvement Project

40. The Surgical Care Improvement Project (SCIP) is a national partnership of organizations interested in improving surgical care by significantly reducing surgical complications. The steering committee is comprised of 10 national organizations who have pledged their commitment and full support for SCIP:

41. Current SCIP quality measures include the following evidence-based outcome improvement interventions: