Pulmonary Infections in Patients with Human Immunodeficiency Virus Disease

Published on 01/06/2015 by admin

Filed under Pulmolory and Respiratory

Last modified 22/04/2025

Print this page

rate 1 star rate 2 star rate 3 star rate 4 star rate 5 star
Your rating: none, Average: 1 (2 votes)

This article have been viewed 2116 times

Chapter 29 Pulmonary Infections in Patients with Human Immunodeficiency Virus Disease

Epidemiology, Risk Factors, and Pathophysiology

Human Immunodeficiency Virus Infection: Background

It is now more than 30 years since the first report from Los Angeles, in the United States, of an “outbreak” of Pneumocystis pneumonia (PCP) among homosexual men that heralded the onset of the global human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) pandemic. Since the early 1980s, HIV infection has steadily spread throughout the world and caused an estimated 25 million deaths. At the end of 2009, according to the United Nations Program on HIV/AIDS (UNAIDS), 33.3 million people worldwide were HIV-infected, a majority of these living in resource-poor countries. In 2008, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) reported that in the United States, 1,178,350 persons 13 years of age or older were living with HIV infection, and more than 40,000 were newly infected each year. In the United Kingdom, the Health Protection Agency estimated that in 2009, 86,500 persons were living with HIV infection and 6630 were newly diagnosed. Over the previous 10 years, the proportion of U.K. residents older than 50 years of age who were living with HIV infection had increased from 1 in 20 to 1 in 5.

Current antiretroviral therapy (ART) regimens have the potential to suppress HIV replication for decades. In 2011, persons with newly diagnosed HIV infection living in nations such as the United States and the United Kingdom that provide access to treatment and care have an expectation that on ART their life expectancy will approach that for an age-matched HIV-uninfected population. Their clinicians now manage HIV-infected populations whose medical complications reflect age-related comorbidity. Unfortunately, these observations do not apply to a majority of people worldwide with HIV infection, who live in financially impoverished environments with little access to comprehensive health care prevention and treatment programs.

Respiratory disease remains an important contributor to morbidity and mortality, and more than two thirds of HIV-infected persons have at least one respiratory episode during the course of their illness. With relatively preserved immune responses, infectious agents are similar to those seen in the general population, although at a higher frequency. With progressive HIV disease, subjects are at an increased risk for opportunistic disease. For example, the North American Prospective Study of Pulmonary Complications of HIV Infection (PCHIS), a multicenter cohort drawn from all HIV risk groups at various stages of immunocompromise, revealed that over an 18-month study period, of approximately 1000 subjects who were not using ART, 33% reported an upper respiratory tract infection, 16% had an episode of acute bronchitis, 5% acute sinusitis, 5% bacterial pneumonia, and 4% developed PCP.

The immune dysregulation that arises from HIV infection means that bacteria, mycobacteria, fungi, viruses, and protozoa can all cause disease in patients with advanced infection. Box 29-1 shows the organisms that typically infect the lung in HIV disease. Of these, the agents of bacterial infections, tuberculosis, and PCP are the most important. In the West, 40% of diagnosed AIDS cases are due to PCP. This chapter provides a brief general overview of the epidemiology and pathogenesis of HIV infection, followed by a more detailed discussion of other important aspects of the disease and its infectious pulmonary complications.

It is reported that by the end of 2009, 33.3 million people worldwide had acquired HIV infection (Figure 29-1). Of these, over 40% are thought to have developed AIDS (for definition of AIDS, see Tables 29-1 and 29-2 and Box 29-2). Globally, 2.6 million people acquired HIV infection in 2009, and 1.8 million died of AIDS. The developing world has been most affected. Sub-Saharan Africa is the current epicenter of the pandemic (accounting for two thirds of all infections); here, nearly 6% of adults are HIV-infected. South and Southeast Asia are responsible for almost a fifth of the estimated HIV global burden. In Central-Eastern Europe and Central Asia, there are currently 1.4 million HIV-infected persons. In the developed world, North America and Western Europe account for approximately 1.5 million and 820,000 infections, respectively. The vast majority of these are spread through sexual contact, although vertical (mother-to-child) and blood-borne infections are common. In the developing world, heterosexual transmission is the norm. In North America and Europe, men who have sex with men constitute the largest group of HIV-infected persons.

image

Figure 29-1 Estimated number of adults and children with human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) infection (for December 2009) by regions of the world.

(From UNAIDS: AIDS epidemic update: December 2009, Geneva, World Health Organization, 2009. www.unaids.org/en/dadataanalysis/epidemiology/2009aiddsepidemiologyupdate/, accessed 10/03/2012.)

Table 29-1 CDC Classification of HIV Infection

Group Infection
I Acute primary
II Asymptomatic
III Persistent generalized lymphadenopathy
IV Other disease
Subgroup A Constitutional disease (e.g., weight loss >10% of body weight or >4.5 kg; fevers with temperatures >38.5° C for >1 month; diarrhea lasting >1 month)
Subgroup B Neurologic disease (e.g., HIV encephalopathy, myelopathy, peripheral neuropathy)
Subgroup C Secondary infectious diseases
Subgroup C1 AIDS-defining secondary diseases (e.g., Pneumocystis jirovecii pneumonia, cerebral toxoplasmosis, cytomegalovirus retinitis)
Subgroup C2 Other specified secondary infectious diseases (e.g., oral candidiasis, multidermatomal varicella zoster)
Subgroup D Secondary cancers (e.g., Kaposi sarcoma, non-Hodgkin lymphoma)
Subgroup E Other conditions (e.g., lymphoid interstitial pneumonitis)

AIDS, acquired immunodeficiency syndrome; HIV, human immunodeficiency virus.

Virology and Immunology of the Human Immunodeficiency Virus

HIV was first isolated in 1983 from patients with symptoms and signs of immune compromise. Two subtypes, HIV-1 and HIV-2, have subsequently been identified. HIV-1 (hereafter referred to as HIV) is responsible for a majority of infections, is associated with a more aggressive clinical course, and is the focus of this chapter.

HIV is a human retrovirus belonging to the lentivirus family. Cell-free or cell-associated HIV infects through attachment of its viral envelope protein (gp120) to the CD4 antigen complex on host cells. The CD4 receptor is found on several cell types, although the T helper lymphocyte is the main site of HIV infection in the body. Additionally, HIV gp120 also must bind to the cell surface protein co-receptor chemokine receptor 5 (CCR5), or to other co-receptors, including CXCR4, depending on the host cell type. Polymorphisms in genes coding for CCR5 may affect disease progression by reducing the ability of HIV to enter and infect cells. At a population level, this effect appears to be small.

Once HIV is inside the cell, it uses the enzyme reverse transcriptase (RNA-dependent DNA polymerase) to transcribe its own RNA into a DNA copy that translocates into the nucleus and integrates with host cell DNA using its viral integrase. The virus (as proviral DNA) remains latent in many cells until the cell itself becomes activated. This may arise from cytokine or antigen stimulation. The viral genetic material is then transcribed into new RNA, which, in the form of newly created virions, bud from the cell surface and infect other host CD4-bearing cells.

HIV infection directly attacks the immune system, and in particular the T helper cells that underpin the coordinated immune response. This leads to progressive immune dysfunction, with an inability to react to opportunistic pathogens as well as persistent, unregulated immune activation. The etiopathogenic process is not well defined, although at the time of primary infection it is thought that HIV spreads to regional lymph nodes, circulating immune cells, and thymus. The result is a massive viral infection of the human host, which, despite a relatively potent immune response, targets specific memory T cells responsible for sustaining long-term protective immunity. Without therapeutic intervention, progressive immune failure is inevitable. This occurs through a combination of direct cell killing caused by HIV replicating within cells and the negative effects of chronic immune activation. Ultimately, in most cases the infection produces immune system destruction and dysfunction, which is reflected in a reduction in circulating absolute blood CD4+ cell count, a decrease in the percentage of T cells expressing CD4 markers, and a fall in the CD4+-to-CD8+ T cell ratio. Patients present with clinical disease indicating profound immunodeficiency.

Natural History of Human Immunodeficiency Virus Infection

Intervention with ART, as well as specific preventive (prophylactic) therapy for opportunistic infections has changed the clinical presentation of HIV disease in countries in which these interventions are available. Death rates for HIV-infected cohorts have fallen precipitously. In the absence of ART, in the developed world the median interval between HIV seroconversion and progression to AIDS is estimated to be 10 years and is shorter in cash-poor countries. Untreated, almost all cases of HIV infection progress to full-blown AIDS; without ART, 95% of affected patients will die within 5 years. Globally, in 2011 the main causes of death among HIV-infected patients (a majority of whom were not receiving ART) included tuberculosis, enteric bacterial infection, bacterial pneumonia, and PCP.

The clinical course of untreated HIV infection evolves in several reasonably distinct stages. First, acquisition of the virus, next, seroconversion, which (in the minority) may be associated with a clinical illness (primary HIV infection), then follows a clinically silent period lasting several months to years which leads to symptoms and signs indicating progressive HIV-induced immune compromise, ultimately resulting in AIDS (e.g., PCP).

Chronic Human Immunodeficiency Virus Infection

Although a proportion of HIV-seropositive persons remain completely well without ART for an extended period (approximately 20%, after 10 years), many infected persons have minor symptoms and signs suggesting immune dysfunction. Oral candidiasis and constitutional symptoms (e.g., malaise, idiopathic fever, night sweats, diarrhea, weight loss) are the strongest clinical predictors of progression to AIDS.

The term AIDS was originally created as an epidemiologic tool to capture specific clinical presentations, which early in the HIV epidemic appeared to suggest significant immune deficiency. Over the past 30 years, the definition has been modified to incorporate the expanding spectrum of diseases affecting HIV-infected patients, including cervical carcinoma and recurrent bacterial pneumonia (see Box 29-2). The 1993 CDC classification included an immunologic criterion for AIDS (CD4+ count below 200 cells/µL or CD4+ percentage less than 14% of total lymphocytes) regardless of clinical symptoms (see Table 29-2). These data are used to define a point at which the risk for severe opportunistic infection rises dramatically.

Apart from cervical carcinoma, AIDS indicator diseases differ little between men and women. Injection drug users in the United States and the United Kingdom have a high incidence of recurrent bacterial pneumonia and tuberculosis. Geographic differences occur that reflect the opportunistic pathogens present in the local environment (e.g., histoplasmosis or visceral leishmaniasis usually are found only in patients from endemic areas). In the developed world, survival differences after an AIDS diagnosis mainly arise from variation in ease of access to and provision of medical care. It is clear that better treatment outcomes are associated with specialist care provided by treatment centers with extensive experience in the management of HIV-infected persons.

In countries in which ART is available, the spectrum of HIV-related disease has changed over the past 30 years. In the HIV Outpatient Study (HOPS), a prospective multicenter observational study in the United States, between 1994 and 2007, opportunistic infections associated with very low CD4+ counts (e.g., cytomegalovirus retinitis, Mycobacterium avium complex [MAC] infection) declined rapidly after introduction of ART and stabilized at low levels during the period 2003 to 2007. In the EuroSIDA cohort (a pan-European prospective study of HIV infection), between 1994 and 2004, opportunistic infections were observed less frequently over time, and malignant disease, such as non-Hodgkin lymphoma, increased as an AIDS-defining event.

Although death rates have fallen in ART-treated populations, there has been a rise in the proportion of non-AIDS deaths. In some series, this category accounts for a majority of events. Causes include liver disease (often due to viral hepatitides) and cancer, as well as cardiovascular disease and drug-related toxicity. In such circumstances, AIDS deaths usually occur among patients who have not accessed medical care regularly and who present with advanced HIV disease.

A new manifestation of opportunistic infection has been described in patients commencing ART. The immune reconstitution inflammatory syndrome (IRIS) (the pathogenesis of which is discussed later under treatment for tuberculosis) may cause severe if temporary clinical illness as the patient’s immunity recovers. Patients appear to experience a relapse of their original (and often incompletely treated) disease. IRIS often is seen in MAC infection, tuberculosis, hepatitis B, CMV retinitis, and herpesvirus infection. In the developed world, metabolic complications of ART, such as ischemic heart disease, hypertension, diabetes, and cerebrovascular disease, are increasingly encountered by clinicians providing care. A significant number of persons receiving ART also experience drug toxicity. An increasing number of patients also are surviving to manifest symptoms associated with chronic hepatitis B and C virus infection. HIV-associated nephropathy (often with chronic kidney disease) is common among black Africans and is a significant cause of long-term morbidity.

Pulmonary Immune Response During Human Immunodeficiency Virus Infection

It is clear from the frequency with which HIV-related respiratory disease occurs that the pulmonary immune response is profoundly compromised. Evidence from simian immunodeficiency virus (SIV)-infected primates indicates that within the lung acute retroviral infection causes a rapid increase, followed by a decline in SIV RNA. Intrapulmonary replication is “compartmentalized,” in that plasma SIV levels correlate poorly with those in bronchoalveolar lavage (BAL) fluid. In humans, comparison of HIV replication in blood and in alveolar lining fluid indicates that little intrapulmonary HIV replication occurs when patients are asymptomatic. This process increases significantly with development of pulmonary disease, and in some instances, local HIV replication is greater than in plasma. Other studies, however, show no consistent change in HIV levels in BAL fluid as the patient’s clinical status alters. Pulmonary memory CD4+ cells are not as extensively infected by HIV compared with those within the gastrointestinal tract. Alveolar macrophages appear to carry a much lower HIV “viral load” than macrophages obtained from other body sites.

HIV affects both the humoral and cellular components of innate immunity. These alterations are apparent even in patients with (near) normal CD4+ counts and undetectable HIV loads, and include a BAL CD8+ lymphocytosis. HIV-induced impairment of innate immune function, particularly when there is additional CD4+ cell depletion, likely contributes to the pathogenesis of opportunistic pulmonary infections, for example, the increased risk of mycobacterium tuberculosis infection and bacterial pneumonia.

Phagocytosis of bacteria by human alveolar macrophages does not appear to be influenced by HIV infection, suggesting that other mechanisms are important. In the general population deficiencies in signaling through Toll-like receptors (TLRs) are associated with an increased risk of, or an adverse outcome from, a number of infections. Activation of HIV-infected human macrophages by TLR4 results in impaired tumor necrosis factor-α release compared to that from uninfected macrophages; as interleukin (IL)-10 release is not impaired, this effect appears specific.

Intra-pulmonary immune responses after ART initiation are not as well described as those occurring during untreated HIV infection. Detection of HIV in BAL fluid is less likely in subjects on ART. Starting such therapy is associated with a delayed but significant decrease in the absolute number and percentage of alveolar CD8+ lymphocytes. Successful virologic control leads to a reduction in activated intrapulmonary CD8+ cells and increases in CD8+-naive and central memory cells—implying that the intrapulmonary CD8+ lymphocyte pool is repopulated from the peripheral circulation.

ART also induces a marked reduction in concentrations of proinflammatory cytokines and chemokines in BAL fluid. Despite this, both IFN-γ and IFN-γ inducible chemokines (inducible protein [IP]-10, monokine induced by IFN-γ [MIG]) remain detectable and appear to contribute to recruitment of memory cells into the lung.

On the basis of these findings, it is hypothesized that ART-naive patients have uncontrolled intrapulmonary HIV replication, which results in nonspecific cellular activation and augmented cytokine and chemokine expression. These changes promote an influx of inflammatory cells into the alveoli. With institution of ART, intrapulmonary HIV load and cellular activation are reduced and nonspecific cytokine secretion resolves, although persistent, low-level IFN-γ production from resident memory cells maintains IFN-γ–inducible chemokine levels. As a result, normal intrapulmonary trafficking of these cells occurs, resulting in more clear-cut evidence of innate and acquired immune control. The former includes ART reducing mononuclear cell chemokine production with a subsequent impact on TLR2-mediated signaling.

Risk Factors for Respiratory Disease

An individual patient’s risk for respiratory disease is determined by the medical history (e.g., receipt of effective preventive therapy or ART), place of residence and travel history (e.g., the influence of geography on mycobacterial and fungal disease), and immunity status. Falling blood CD4+ counts or high plasma HIV RNA “viral loads” increase the chance of respiratory infection, with an increased spectrum of potential organisms associated with greater degrees of immunosuppression. For example, HIV-infected patients with a CD4+ count below 200 cells/µL are four times more likely to have one episode of bacterial pneumonia per year than those with higher CD4+ cell counts. More exotic organisms are found in subjects with very low CD4+ counts. These include bacteria such as Rhodococcus equi and Nocardia asteroides and fungi such as Aspergillus spp. and Penicillium marneffei. Just as with P. jirovecii, this increased susceptibility reflects the importance of T cell depletion and macrophage dysfunction in the loss of host immunity (a process that has been confirmed by animal experiments).

Among HIV-infected patients, injection drug users are at greatest risk for development of bacterial pneumonia and tuberculosis. Persons who have had previous respiratory episodes (PCP or bacterial pneumonia) appear to be at increased risk for subsequent episodes of such disease. Whether this susceptibility relates to host or environmental factors is not certain, although structural lung damage and abnormal pulmonary physiology are likely to be contributing factors. This argument is supported by the increased rates of pneumonia in HIV-infected smokers compared with nonsmokers. Recent work has shown that chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) and lung cancer occur more frequently and at a younger age among HIV-infected patients, than in the general population. In view of the large number of HIV-infected persons who smoke heavily, targeting this population for smoking cessation obviously is a pressing need. This goal is reinforced by the association between smoking and an increased risk for bacterial pneumonia and more rapid progression to first AIDS illness and death.

Clinical Features

Bacterial Infection

Bronchiectasis

Bronchiectasis is increasingly recognized in HIV-infected patients with advanced HIV disease and low CD4+ lymphocyte counts. It probably arises secondary to recurrent bacterial, mycobacterial or P. jirovecii infections. The diagnosis most often is made by high-resolution (thin-section) computed tomography (CT) scanning (Figure 29-2). Its prevalence has not been accurately determined, although with improved survival from both opportunistic infections and HIV disease, it can be expected to be increasingly common in clinical practice. The pathogens isolated in patients with bronchiectasis are those seen in bronchitis. In addition, Burkholderia cepacia and Moraxella catarrhalis have been described.

Pneumonia

Community-acquired bacterial pneumonia occurs more frequently in HIV-infected patients than in the general population. It is especially common in HIV-infected injecting drug users. The spectrum of bacterial pathogens is similar to that in non–HIV-infected persons (see Box 29-1). S. pneumoniae is the most commonly identified pathogen, followed by H. influenzae. HIV-infected patients with S. pneumoniae–related pneumonia frequently are bacteremic. In one study, the rate of pneumococcal bacteremia in HIV-infected patients was 100 times that for an HIV-negative population. More recent work has confirmed this to be the case for all causes of HIV-related bacterial pneumonia. Typically, blood cultures have a 40-fold increased pick-up rate in HIV-positive patients. The widespread use of ART has led to some decrease in rates of bacterial pneumonia and bacteremia, although they are still considerably higher than in a non–HIV-infected population.

Bacterial pneumonia has a similar presentation in HIV-infected patients and in uninfected persons. Chest radiographs frequently are atypical in appearance, mimicking that in PCP in up to half of the cases (Figure 29-3). By contrast, radiographic lobar or segmental consolidation also may be seen in a wide range of bacterial organisms (Figure 29-4); these include S. pneumoniae, P. aeruginosa, H. influenzae, and M. tuberculosis. PCP also may manifest with lobar or segmental consolidation. In patients with more advanced HIV disease and low CD4+ lymphocyte counts, P. aeruginosa and S. aureus also can cause pneumonia.

Complications of bacterial pneumonia are frequent, and pleural effusions are twice as likely in HIV infection (often occurring with S. aureus infection); empyema and intrapulmonary abscessation are present in up to 10% of patients. Inevitably, the mortality rate is high (approximately 10%).

Other Bacterial Infections

Mycobacterial Infections

Tuberculosis

HIV infection is associated with a 20- to 40-fold increased risk for development of active tuberculosis disease in a person with latent tuberculosis infection (LTBI) over that in noninfected subjects. Taken together with its ability to infect both the immunocompromised and the immunocompetent, tuberculosis is perhaps therefore the single most important disease associated with HIV infection. It is estimated that each year, 1.1 million new cases of active tuberculosis occur in HIV-infected patients. Accordingly, tuberculosis is a major cause of HIV-related morbidity and mortality. It also is a clear driver in both resource-rich and poor countries for the current overall increase in tuberculosis rates. Where HIV infection is endemic, tuberculosis control at a population level is almost impossible if treatment for both infections is not available.

In the United Kingdom, many centers routinely offer HIV antibody testing to all patients with tuberculosis, regardless of risk factors for HIV infection. In the United States, the CDC now recommends HIV testing as a routine part of health care for all patients 13 to 64 years of age seeking medical services. The benefit of treating HIV co-infection is indisputable. Moreover, strategies that reduce high-risk behavior and cut ongoing HIV transmission can be introduced. Unfortunately, offering HIV testing in tuberculosis clinics has not been routine practice in many countries, and integration with HIV infection–related services is poor. This disconnect leads to both diagnostic delay of HIV infection and potentially suboptimal, uncoordinated care, with potentially disastrous outcomes.

Active tuberculosis can occur at any stage of HIV infection and, unlike almost every other HIV-related infection, may do so despite effective ART. In the United States, the United Kingdom, and most European countries, reporting of tuberculosis in both HIV-infected and non–HIV-infected patients is mandatory.

Clinical disease in HIV-infected patients may arise in several different ways: by reactivation of latent tuberculosis, by rapid progression of pulmonary infection, and by reinfection from an exogenous source.

Pulmonary disease is the most common presentation, and clinical manifestations are determined by the patient’s level of immunity. For example, persons with reasonably well-preserved CD4+ counts exhibit clinical features similar to those of “normal” adult postprimary disease (Table 29-3). Signs and symptoms typically include weight loss, fever with sweats, cough, sputum, dyspnea, hemoptysis, and chest pain. These patients may have no clinical features to suggest associated HIV infection. The chest radiograph frequently shows upper lobe consolidation, and cavitary change is common (Figure 29-5). If performed, the tuberculin skin test (TST), using purified protein derivative (PPD), usually gives a positive result, and the likelihood that spontaneously expectorated sputum or BAL fluid will be smear-positive for acid-fast bacilli is high.

Table 29-3 Tuberculosis and Human Immunodeficiency Virus (HIV) Infection

Diagnostic Feature Stage of HIV Disease
Reasonable Immunity Impaired Immunity
Chest radiographic appearance Upper zone infiltrates and cavities (cf postprimary infection) Lymphadenopathy, effusions, miliary or diffuse infiltrates (cf primary infection)
Normal
Sputum or bronchoalveolar lavage “smear-positive” Frequently Less commonly
Disease site Localized Widely disseminated
Tuberculin test–positive Frequently Less commonly

In persons with advanced HIV disease (i.e., low CD4+ lymphocyte counts and clinically apparent immunosuppression), it may be difficult to diagnose tuberculosis. The clinical presentation here often is with nonspecific symptoms. Fever, weight loss, fatigue, and malaise may be mistakenly ascribed to HIV infection itself. In this context, pulmonary tuberculosis is often similar to primary infection, with the chest radiograph showing diffuse or miliary-type shadowing (Figure 29-6), hilar or mediastinal lymphadenopathy, or pleural effusion; cavitation is unusual, with no upper zone chest radiographic predominance. In up to 10% of patients, the chest radiograph may appear normal; in others, the pulmonary infiltrate can be bilateral, diffuse, and interstitial in pattern, thus mimicking PCP. Hilar lymphadenopathy and pleural effusion also may be manifestations of pulmonary Kaposi sarcoma or lymphoma, with which M. tuberculosis may coexist. The TST result usually is negative, and spontaneously expectorated sputum and BAL fluid samples often are smear-negative (although they are culture-positive).

In addition to pulmonary tuberculosis, extrapulmonary disease occurs in a high proportion of HIV-infected persons with low CD4+ lymphocyte counts (less than 150 cells/µL). Mycobacteremia and generalized lymph node infection (Figure 29-7) are common, but involvement of bone marrow, liver, pericardium, meninges, and brain also has been described.

image

Figure 29-7 Photomicrograph of mediastinal lymph node showing necrotic tissue surrounded by areas of poorly developed granulomatous inflammation (left inset). A Ziehl-Neelsen stain showed numerous acid-fast bacilli (right inset).

(Reproduced from Miller RF, Shahmanesh M, Talbot MD, et al: Progressive symptoms and signs following institution of highly active antiretroviral therapy and subsequent antituberculosis therapy: immune reconstitution syndrome or infection? Sex Transm Infect 82:111–116, 2006.)

Evidence of extrapulmonary tuberculosis should be sought in any HIV-infected patient with suspected or confirmed pulmonary tuberculosis, by culture of stool, urine, and blood or bone marrow. Traditional solid phase culture and speciation techniques may take 6 to 10 weeks. Liquid culture methods (e.g., BACTEC, Becton Dickinson, Towson, Maryland) that detect early growth provide a faster diagnosis (usually in 2 to 3 weeks). Molecular diagnostic tests using M. tuberculosis genome detection (e.g., by polymerase chain reaction [PCR]) offer the possibility of yet more rapid diagnosis (within hours). The original concerns that “high-tech” systems may not be practical in a field setting are now being challenged. The World Health Organization (WHO) has endorsed the Xpert TBRIF assay, which is portable and simple to use with sputum samples. This kit is expensive, however, although it may be of use in high-prevalence tuberculosis/HIV infection settings, in which prompt treatment initiation is critical to infection control. Current data suggest that such tests are of value, although less sensitive in HIV-infected subjects (in whom sputum samples generally have a lower bacterial load). The availability of simple but highly sensitive and specific methods that utilize the inoculation of large quantities of the sample (e.g., sputum) onto microscopic plates with subsequent rapid detection (in days) of both mycobacterial growth and resistance patterns (i.e., microscopic observation drug susceptibility [MODS] assay) is of great potential significance.

Until the results of culture and speciation are known, acid-fast bacilli identified in respiratory samples, biopsy tissue, an aspirate, or blood in an HIV-infected patient, regardless of the CD4+ lymphocyte count, should be regarded as being M. tuberculosis, and conventional antituberculosis therapy should be commenced. If culture fails to demonstrate M. tuberculosis and instead another mycobacterium (see later) is identified, then the treatment regimen can be modified.

Drug-Resistant Tuberculosis

Multiple drug–resistant (MDR) tuberculosis—that is, disease caused by M. tuberculosis strains resistant to isoniazid and rifampicin (rifampin), with or without other drugs—is now an important clinical problem in HIV-infected patients in the United States, where it is responsible for approximately 3% of all cases of tuberculosis in this population. Outbreaks of MDR tuberculosis have occurred in both HIV-infected and non–HIV-infected persons in the United States in prison facilities, hostels, and hospitals. Similar incidents also have been documented among HIV-infected patients in Europe. Inadequate treatment (including case management and supervision of medication) of tuberculosis and poor patient compliance with antituberculosis therapy are the most important risk factors for development of MDR tuberculosis. Other cases have arisen through exogenous reinfection of profoundly immunosuppressed HIV-infected patients who are already receiving treatment for drug-sensitive disease.

Despite antituberculosis therapy, the median survival in HIV-infected persons with MDR tuberculosis initially was only 2 to 3 months. Recently this has improved, largely because of an increased awareness of the condition with early initiation of suitable therapy as determined by drug sensitivity testing.

The advances in molecular diagnostics are not confined to rapid mycobacterial speciation. Commercial kits are available which can detect the commonest mutations that confer rifampicin and isoniazid resistance with good sensitivity. These are of great potential value in infection control in tuberculosis-endemic areas. They can guide initial therapy, assess for resistance in unexpected poor clinical response and significantly improve treatment outcomes. Next generation tests will also incorporate drug resistance profiles for other important agents such as fluoroquinolones.

Infections Due to Mycobacteria Other Than Tuberculosis

Pneumocystis jirovecii Pneumonia

The development of PCP is largely related to underlying states of immunosuppression induced by malignancy or treatment thereof, organ transplantation, or HIV infection. In 2011 in the United States, the United Kingdom, Europe, and Australasia, PCP was largely seen only in HIV-infected persons unaware of their serostatus or in those reported to be intolerant of or noncompliant with anti–P. jirovecii prophylaxis and ART.

P. jirovecii originally was regarded as a protozoan, as suggested by its morphology and the lack of response to antifungal agents such as amphotericin B. The organism is now thought to be a fungus. The demonstration of antibodies against P. jirovecii in most healthy children and adults suggests that infection is acquired in childhood and persists in the lungs in a dormant phase. Subsequent immunosuppression (e.g., as a result of HIV infection) allows the fungus to propagate in the lung, causing clinical disease. This “latency hypothesis,” however, is challenged by several observations: P. jirovecii cannot be identified in the lungs of immunocompetent persons; “case clusters” of PCP in health care facilities suggest recent transmission; different genotypes of P. jirovecii are identified in each episode in HIV-infected patients who have recurrent PCP; genotypes of P. jirovecii in patients who have PCP correlate with place of diagnosis and not with their place of birth, suggesting infection has been recently acquired. Taken together, these data suggest that PCP arises by reinfection from an exogenous source.

The clinical presentation of PCP is nonspecific, with onset of progressive exertional dyspnea over days or weeks, together with a dry cough, with or without expectoration of minimal quantities of mucoid sputum. Patients often report an inability to take a deep breath, which is not due to pleurisy (Table 29-4). Fever is common, yet patients rarely complain of temperature-related signs and symptoms including sweats. In HIV-infected patients, the presentation usually is more insidious than in those receiving immunosuppressive therapy. The median time to diagnosis from onset of symptoms is more than 3 weeks in those with HIV infection, compared with less than 1 week in non–HIV-infected patients. In a small proportion of HIV-positive patients, the disease course of PCP is fulminant, with an interval of only 5 to 7 days between onset of symptoms and progression to development of respiratory failure. In others, it may be much more indolent, with respiratory symptoms that worsen almost imperceptibly over several months. Rarely, PCP may manifest as a fever of undetermined origin without respiratory symptoms.

Table 29-4 Clinical Presentation in Pneumocystis jirovecii Pneumonia

Examination Typical Presentation Atypical Presentation
Symptoms Progressive exertional dyspnea over days or weeks Sudden onset of dyspnea over hours or days
Dry cough ± mucoid sputum Cough productive of purulent sputum
Hemoptysis
Difficulty taking in a deep breath not related to pleuritic pain Chest pain (pleuritic or “crushing”)
Fever ± sweats
Tachypnea
 
Signs Normal breath sounds or fine end-inspiratory basal crackles Wheeze, signs of focal consolidation or pleural effusion
Chest radiographic appearance Early: perihilar “haze,” or bilateral interstitial shadowing Pleural effusion, lobar or segmental consolidation
Late: alveolar-interstitial changes or “whiteout” (marked alveolar consolidation with sparing of apices and costophrenic angles)
Arterial blood gases PaO2: early: normal; late: low  
PaCO2: early: normal or low; late: normal or high

Clinical examination usually is remarkable only for the absence of physical signs; occasionally, fine, basal, end-inspiratory crackles are audible. Features that would suggest an alternative diagnosis include a cough productive of purulent sputum or hemoptysis, chest pain (particularly pleural pain), and signs of focal consolidation or pleural effusion (see Table 29-4). Of note, infection with more than one pathogen occurs in almost one fifth of these patients, so symptoms may be related to infection with any of several agents.

The chest radiographic appearance in PCP typically is unremarkable initially. Later, diffuse reticular shadowing, especially in the perihilar regions, is seen and may progress to widespread alveolar consolidation that resembles that in untreated pulmonary edema or with presentation late in disease. At this stage, the lung may be grossly consolidated and almost airless (Figure 29-8). Up to 20% of chest radiographs are atypical in appearance, showing lobar consolidation, honeycomb lung, multiple thin-walled cystic air spaces (pneumatoceles), intrapulmonary nodules, cavitary lesions, pneumothorax, and hilar and mediastinal lymphadenopathy. Predominantly apical changes, resembling those of tuberculosis, may occur in patients with PCP that developed subsequent to anti–P. jirovecii prophylaxis with nebulized pentamidine (Figure 29-9). All of these radiographic changes are nonspecific; similar changes occur with other pulmonary pathogens, including pyogenic bacterial, mycobacterial, and fungal infection, as well as Kaposi sarcoma and nonspecific interstitial pneumonitis. Respiratory symptoms in an immunosuppressed, HIV-infected patient with a normal-appearing chest radiograph should not be discounted, however, because radiographic abnormalities may not appear until 2 to 3 days later.

The diagnosis of PCP is made by demonstration of the organism in induced sputum, BAL fluid, or lung biopsy material using histochemical or immunofluorescence techniques.

Molecular detection tests for P. jirovecii using a variety of primers have been reported using BAL fluid, induced sputum and oropharyngeal wash (OPW) specimens. In general PCR-based tests have increased sensitivity, but a reduced specificity when compared to visualization of the organism using histochemical stains. This reduced specificity results from the finding that P. jirovecii DNA may be detected in respiratory samples from HIV-infected patients who do not have PCP (such as with tuberculosis or bacterial pneumonia) but are colonized with the organism. One study compared two PCR-based assays; these had sensitivities of 97% and 98%, but specificities were only 68% and 66%. The sensitivity of molecular detection techniques is lower if OPW rather than BAL fluid is used.

Fungal Infections

Many fungal infections of the lung are confined to specific geographic regions, although with widespread travel they may occur in patients outside these areas. Candida, Aspergillus, and Cryptococcus spp. are ubiquitous and are found worldwide.

Cryptococcal Infection

Infection may manifest in one of two ways: either as primary cryptococcosis or complicating cryptococcal meningitis as part of disseminated infection with cryptococcemia, pneumonia, and cutaneous disease (umbilicated papules mimicking molluscum contagiosum) (Figure 29-11). Primary pulmonary cryptococcosis presents in a very nonspecific way and is frequently indistinguishable from other pulmonary infections. In disseminated infection, the presentation frequently is overshadowed by headache, fever, and malaise (caused by meningitis). The time to onset may range from only a few days to several weeks. Examination may reveal skin lesions, lymphadenopathy, and meningism. In the chest, signs may be absent or crackles may be audible. Arterial blood gas analysis may reveal normal findings or show hypoxemia. The most common abnormality on the chest radiograph is focal or diffuse interstitial infiltrates. Less frequently, masses, mediastinal or hilar lymphadenopathy, nodules, and effusion are noted.

The diagnosis of cryptococcal pulmonary infection (Figure 29-12) is made by identification of Cryptococcus neoformans (by staining with India ink or mucicarmine, and by culture) in sputum, BAL fluid, pleural fluid, or lung biopsy tissue. Cryptococcal antigen may be detected in serum using the cryptococcal latex agglutination (CrAg) test. Titers usually are high but may be negative in primary pulmonary cryptococcosis, in which case BAL fluid (CrAg) is positive. In patients with disseminated infection, C. neoformans also may be cultured from blood and cerebrospinal fluid.

Endemic Mycoses

The endemic mycoses caused by Histoplasma capsulatum, Coccidioides immitis, and Blastomyces dermatitidis are found in HIV-infected patients living in North America (especially the Mississippi and Ohio River valleys). Histoplasmosis also is found in Southeast Asia, the Caribbean Islands, and South America. Coccidioidomycosis is endemic in the southwest United States (southern California), northern Mexico, and in parts of Argentina and Brazil. Blastomycosis has a similar distribution, with an extension north into Canada.

Histoplasmosis

Progressive, disseminated histoplasmosis in patients with HIV typically manifests with a subacute onset of fever and weight loss; approximately 50% of patients have mild respiratory symptoms with a nonproductive cough and dyspnea. Hepatosplenomegaly frequently is noted on examination, and a rash (similar to that produced by Cryptococcus spp.) may be seen. Rarely, the presentation may be rapidly fulminant, with clinical features of the sepsis syndrome including anemia or disseminated intravascular coagulation. The chest radiograph may be normal in appearance (in up to one third of patients), although characteristic abnormalities consist of bilateral, widespread nodules 2 to 4 mm in size (Figure 29-13). Other radiographic features are nonspecific and include interstitial infiltrates, reticular nodular shadowing, and alveolar consolidation. The diagnosis is made reliably by identification of the organism in Wright-stained peripheral blood or by Giemsa staining of bone marrow, lymph node, skin, sputum, BAL fluid, or lung tissue. It is important that identification be confirmed by detection of H. capsulatum var. capsulatum polysaccharide antigen by radioimmunoassay, which has a high sensitivity. False-positive results are possible in patients infected with Blastomyces and Coccidioides spp. Testing for Histoplasma antibodies by complement fixation or immunodiffusion techniques may give a negative result in immunosuppressed, HIV-positive patients. Serum (1,3)-β-D-glucan levels may be elevated (see further on).

Protozoal Infections

Toxoplasmosis

Toxoplasma gondii infection in HIV-infected patients usually occurs as a result of reactivation of latent, intracellular protozoa acquired in a primary infection. Toxoplasmic pneumonia frequently manifests with nonproductive cough and dyspnea. Chest radiographic abnormalities include diffuse interstitial infiltrates indistinguishable from those of PCP (Figure 29-16), as well as micronodular infiltrates, a coarse nodular infiltrate, cavitary change, and lobar consolidation. The diagnosis is made by hematoxylin-eosin or Giemsa staining of BAL fluid, which reveals cysts and trophozoites of T. gondii. Staining of BAL fluid is not always positive; the diagnostic yield is increased either by staining of transbronchial biopsy material or by performing PCR assay to detect T. gondii DNA in BAL fluid.

image

Figure 29-16 Chest radiograph showing pathologic changes of Toxoplasma gondii pneumonia. The diffuse bilateral infiltrates resemble those in P. jirovecii pneumonia.

(Reproduced from Miller RF, Lucas SB, Bateman NT: Disseminated Toxoplasma gondii infection presenting with a fulminant pneumonia, Genitourin Med 72:139–143, 1996.)

Diagnosis

It is apparent from the foregoing discussion that HIV-related pneumonias of any cause may present in a very similar manner. A wide range of investigations are available to aid diagnosis. These are listed in Box 29-3. If the subject is producing sputum, it is important to obtain samples for bacterial and mycobacterial detection. In up to one third of cases, these will assist in diagnosis. Obtaining three samples on consecutive days (preferably either with overnight or early morning production) is the crucial first step in the diagnosis of pulmonary tuberculosis. This is considerably easier and safer for health care personnel than obtaining hypertonic saline–induced sputum or BAL fluid. Blood cultures also are important, because very high rates of bacteremia have been reported in both bacterial and mycobacterial disease (see earlier).

A patient who presents with symptoms and signs consistent with pneumonia should have chest radiography and arterial oxygen assessments performed at the first consultation. The question at this stage usually is whether this infectious episode is due to bacterial infection, tuberculosis, or PCP. In general, alveolar and interstitial shadowing is taken as evidence for PCP, although important caveats apply.

Until tuberculosis has been ruled out, the patient should be segregated from other people in hospital and community environments and should be made aware of personal infection control measures such as “cough hygiene.”

Biochemical Assays

Serum (1,3)-β-D-Glucan

In all fungi, including Pneumocystis, (1,3)-β-D-glucan is a cell wall component. Serum (1,3)-β-D-glucan levels are higher in patients with PCP (with or without underlying HIV infection) when compared to patients without PCP. The sensitivity and specificity of this assay are maximal using a cutoff of 100 pg/mL (for diagnosis of PCP). Because serum (1,3)-β-D-glucan levels may be elevated in pneumonia caused by several fungal pathogens, this test does not permit discrimination among potential etiologic disorders (e.g., PCP, Aspergillus infection, histoplasmosis). Additionally, case reports of false-positive results in patients with pulmonary infection due to P. aeruginosa further limit diagnostic utility. Among patients with confirmed PCP, use of serum (1,3)-β-D-glucan levels to monitor response to therapy requires further evaluation.

From the preceding discussion, it is evident that noninvasive tests cannot reliably distinguish the different infecting agents from each other but may be useful in excluding acute opportunistic disease. Thus, the clinician is left with either proceeding to diagnostic lung fluid or tissue sampling (using either induced sputum collection or bronchoscopy and BAL with or without transbronchial biopsy) (Table 29-5) or treating an unknown condition empirically. ART also has altered the investigation of respiratory disease. The numbers of invasive procedures performed are falling, and such procedures tend to be used in patients not taking antiretroviral drugs (usually to exclude PCP), or in whom no response to empirical antibiotic therapy (regardless of the CD4+ count) has been observed.

Induced Sputum

Spontaneously expectorated sputum is inadequate for diagnosis of PCP. Sputum induction by inhalation of ultrasonically nebulized hypertonic saline may provide a suitable specimen (see Table 29-5). The technique requires close attention to detail and is much less useful when samples are purulent. Sputum induction must be carried out away from other immunosuppressed patients and health care workers, ideally in a room with separate negative-pressure ventilation, to reduce the risk of nosocomial transmission of tuberculosis. Although very specific (at a rate greater than 95%), the sensitivity of induced sputum varies widely (55% to 90%), and therefore a negative result for P. jirovecii prompts further diagnostic studies. The use of immunofluorescence staining enhances the yield of induced sputum compared with standard cytochemistry.

Bronchoscopy

Fiberoptic bronchoscopy with BAL commonly is used to diagnose HIV-related pulmonary disease. When a good “wedged” sample is obtained, the test has a sensitivity of greater than 90% for detection of P. jirovecii (Figure 29-19). Just as with induced sputum, fluorescent staining methods increase the diagnostic yield, which makes bronchoscopy the procedure of choice in most centers. More technically demanding (both of the patient and of the operator) than induced sputum collection, bronchoscopy and BAL have the advantage that direct inspection of the upper airway and bronchial tree can be performed and, if necessary, biopsy specimens taken. Transbronchial biopsy may marginally increase the diagnostic yield of the procedure. This is relevant for the diagnosis of mycobacterial disease, although the relatively high complication rate in HIV-infected persons (pneumothorax and the possibility of significant pulmonary hemorrhage in up to 10%) outweighs the advantages of the technique for routine purposes.

Samples of BAL fluid are examined for bacteria, mycobacteria, viruses, fungi, and protozoa. Inspection of the cellular component also may provide etiologic clues—cooperation of a pathology department with experience in opportunistic infection diagnosis is vital. The drug interactions associated with antiretroviral protease inhibitor therapy mean that special care should be exercised with use of sedation with either benzodiazepine or opiate drugs. Prolonged sedation and life-threatening arrhythmias have been reported.

A diagnostic strategy therefore includes sputum induction and, if results are nondiagnostic or if the test is unavailable, bronchoscopy and BAL. If this approach does not yield a result, consideration is given to either a repeat bronchoscopy and BAL with transbronchial biopsy or video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery (VATS) for biopsy.

Empirical Diagnosis and Therapy

Although empirical therapy usually is reserved for the management of presumed bacterial pneumonias and initially may appear unwise when the underlying disease may be an opportunistic infection, in reality PCP is almost invariably a diagnosis of exclusion, and certain clinical and laboratory features may guide the assessment of an HIV-infected patient’s risk for this condition. The likelihood that P. jirovecii is the causative organism increases if the person is not taking effective anti-Pneumocystis drug prophylaxis or has a previous medical history with clinical or laboratory features suggestive of systemic immunosuppression (i.e., recurrent oral thrush, long-standing fever of unknown cause, clinical AIDS, or blood CD4+ count less than 200 cells/µL). Hence, some centers advocate use of empirical therapy for HIV-infected patients who present with symptoms and chest radiographic and blood gas abnormalities typical of mild PCP, without the need for bronchoscopy. Invasive measures are reserved for patients with an atypical radiographic presentation, those who fail to respond to empirical therapy by day 5, and those who exhibit clinical deterioration at any stage.

Most clinicians in the United States and the United Kingdom would seek to obtain a confirmed diagnosis in every case of suspected PCP. In practice, both strategies discussed above appear to be equally effective, although a number of caveats should be borne in mind when empirical treatment is given for PCP. Patients who have PCP typically take 4 to 7 days to show clinical signs of improvement, so a bronchoscopically proven diagnosis ensures that the treatment being given is correct, particularly in the first few days of therapy, when the drug regimen may not be well tolerated. In addition, the diagnosis of PCP has implications for the infected person, because it may influence the decision to start either ART or anti-Pneumocystis prophylaxis. Finally, empirical therapy requires the patient to be maximally adherent with treatment, because nonresolution of symptoms may be seen as a failure of therapy, rather than of compliance.

Treatment

Persons infected with HIV, compared with the non–HIV-infected general population, have an increased likelihood of adverse reactions to therapeutic agents. Such agents include TMP-SMX (see later on) and other antibacterial and antimycobacterial agents. In addition, complex drug interactions with other medications, particularly components of ART, have been reported. Before institution of therapy for any infectious complication in an HIV-infected patient, it is important to consult with a physician experienced in the care of such patients and to seek advice from a specialist pharmacist.

Treatment of Bacterial Pneumonia

The main organisms causing pneumonia in HIV-infected persons are similar to those found in the general population with community-acquired pneumonia. Thus, bacterial pneumonia in HIV-infected patients should be treated in a manner similar to that in HIV-negative persons, using published American Thoracic Society (ATS) and British Thoracic Society (BTS) guidelines. In addition, expert advice on local antibiotic resistance patterns should be sought from infectious disease or microbiology colleagues, because treatment usually is begun on an empirical basis before the causative organism is identified and antibiotic sensitivities are known. The same clinical and laboratory prognostic indices that are described for the general population apply to HIV-infected patients and should be documented on presentation.

Response to appropriate antibiotic therapy usually is rapid and is similar to that seen in the non–HIV-infected person. Early relapse of infection after successful treatment is well described. Those HIV-infected patients who have presumed PCP and are being treated empirically with high-dose TMP-SMX, and who have infection with either S. pneumoniae or H. influenzae, rather than P. jirovecii, also may improve. In addition, in those patients who are treated with benzylpenicillin for proven S. pneumoniae pneumonia but do not respond, and penicillin resistance can be discounted as the cause, it is important to consider the possibility of a second pathologic process, such as PCP. Copathogens are reported in up to 20% of cases of pneumonia.

Treatment of Pneumocystis Jirovecii Pneumonia

Before institution of treatment, assessment of the severity of PCP should be performed, to include a thorough history, physical examination, arterial blood gas analysis, and chest radiography. On the basis of the findings, patients can then be stratified into those with mild, moderate, or severe disease (Table 29-6). This classification is important, because some drugs are of unproven benefit and others are known to be ineffective for the treatment of severe disease. In addition, adjuvant glucocorticoid therapy may be given to patients with moderate or severe pneumonia. Before (or as soon as feasible after) starting therapy with TMP-SMX, dapsone, or primaquine, patients should be tested for glucose-6-phosphate dehydrogenase deficiency, because these drugs increase the risk of hemolysis.

Trimethoprim-Sulfamethoxazole

Several drugs are effective in the treatment of PCP. TMP-SMX is the drug of first choice (Tables 29-7 and 29-8). Overall, it is effective in 70% to 80% of patients when used for first-line therapy. Adverse reactions to TMP-SMX are common and usually become apparent between days 6 and 14 of treatment. Neutropenia and anemia (in up to 40% of patients), rash and fever (up to 30%), and biochemical abnormalities of liver function (up to 15%) are the most frequent adverse reactions. Hematologic toxicity induced by TMP-SMX is neither attenuated nor prevented by coadministration of folic or folinic acid. Furthermore, the use of these agents may be associated with reduced therapeutic success. During treatment with TMP-SMX, monitoring with full blood counts, liver function testing, and measurements of urea and electrolytes at least twice weekly is indicated.

Table 29-8 Treatment Schedules for Pneumocystis jirovecii Pneumonia*

Drug Dosage Comments
Trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole (TMP-SMX) Trimethoprim 15-20 mg/kg IV q24h plus sulfamethoxazole 75-100 mg/kg IV daily in divided doses, q6h or q8h Give IV for moderate to severe disease, can change to oral formulation after clinical improvement
Same daily dose of TMP-SMX as above, given in divided doses q8h for 21 days Given for mild disease
OR
1920 mg (two TMP-SMX double-strength tablets) PO q8h for 21 days
Clindamycin-primaquine Clindamycin 600-900 mg IV q6h-q8h plus primaquine 15-30 mg PO q24h for 21 days Methemoglobinemia less likely if primaquine dose of 15 mg PO q24h is used
OR
Clindamycin 300-450 mg PO q6h-q8h plus primaquine 15-30 mg PO q24h for 21 days
Pentamidine 4 mg/kg IV q24h for 21 days Diluted in 250 mL of 5% dextrose in water and infused over 60 minutes
3 mg/kg IV q24h for 21 days used by some clinicians to reduce toxicity
Trimethoprim-dapsone Trimethoprim 15 mg/kg PO q24h in divided doses q8h plus dapsone 100 mg PO q24h for 21 days  
Atovaquone 750 mg PO q12h for 21 days Give with food to increase absorption
Glucocorticoids Prednisolone 40 mg PO q12h on days 1-5, then 40 mg PO q24h on days 6-10, then 20 mg PO q24h on days 11-21 Regimen recommended by CDC/NIH/IDSA; widely used in United States
OR
Methylprednisolone IV at 75% of dose given above for prednisolone
Methylprednisolone 1 g IV q24h on days 1-3, then 0.5 g IV q24h on days 4-6, then prednisolone 40 mg PO q24h, tapered to 0 over days 7-16 Regimen widely used in United Kingdom

CDC, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention; NIH, National Institutes of Health; IDSA, Infectious Diseases Society of America.

* NOTE: None of these regimens for adjuvant glucocorticoids therapy have been compared in prospective clinical trials.

It is not known why HIV-infected patients, especially those with higher CD4+ counts, experience such a high frequency of adverse reactions to TMP-SMX. The optimal strategy for management of an HIV-infected patient who has PCP and who becomes intolerant of high-dose TMP-SMX has not been established. Many physicians advocate “treating through” minor rash, often adding an antihistamine and a short course of oral prednisolone (30 mg every 24 hours, tapering to zero over 5 days).

Other Therapeutic Agents

If treatment with TMP-SMX fails, or is not tolerated by the patient, several alternative therapies are available (see Tables 29-7 and 29-8).

Atovaquone

Atovaquone is licensed for the treatment of mild and moderate-severity PCP in patients who are intolerant of TMP-SMX. In tablet formulation (no longer available), this drug was less effective but was better tolerated than TMP-SMX or intravenous pentamidine for treatment of mild or moderate-severity PCP (see Tables 29-7 and 29-8). There are no data from prospective studies that compare the liquid formulation (which has better bioavailability) with other treatment regimens. Common adverse reactions include rash, fever, nausea and vomiting, and constipation. Absorption of atovaquone is increased if it is taken with food.

Intravenous Pentamidine

Intravenous pentamidine is now seldom used for the treatment of mild or moderate-severity PCP because of its toxicity. Intravenous pentamidine may be used in patients who have severe PCP, despite its toxicity, if other agents have failed (see Tables 29-7 and 29-8). Nephrotoxicity develops in almost 60% of patients given intravenous pentamidine (indicated by elevation in serum creatinine), leukopenia develops in approximately half, and up to 25% have symptomatic hypotension or nausea and vomiting. Hypoglycemia occurs in approximately 20% of patients. Because of the long half-life of the drug, this effect may emerge up to several days after the discontinuation of treatment. Pancreatitis also is a recognized side effect.

Adjuvant Glucocorticoids

For patients who have moderate and severe PCP, adjuvant glucocorticoid therapy reduces the risk of respiratory failure by up to half, and the risk of death by up to one third (see Tables 29-7 and 29-8). Glucocorticoids are given to HIV-infected patients with confirmed or suspected PCP who have a PaO2 less than below 70 mm Hg or a PO2(A−a) greater than greater than 33 mm Hg. Oral or intravenous adjunctive therapy is given at the same time as (or within 72 hours of starting) specific anti–P. jirovecii therapy. Clearly, in some patients treatment is commenced on a presumptive basis, pending confirmation of the diagnosis. If glucocorticoids are started at a later time, the benefits are less clear, although most clinicians would use these agents in patients with moderate or severe PCP. In prospective studies, adjuvant glucocorticoids have not been shown to be of benefit in patients with mild PCP. However, it would be difficult to demonstrate this, given that survival in such cases approaches 95% with standard treatment.

Deterioration in the Patient with Pneumocystis jirovecii Pneumonia

Deterioration in a patient who is receiving anti–P. jirovecii therapy may occur for several reasons (Table 29-9). Before deterioration is ascribed to treatment failure necessitating a change in therapy, these alternatives should be evaluated carefully. It also is important to consider treating for any copathogens present in BAL fluid and to perform bronchoscopy if the diagnosis was made empirically, and to repeat the procedure or carry out open lung biopsy to confirm that the diagnosis is correct.

Table 29-9 Causes of Clinical Deterioration in a Human Immunodeficiency Virus (HIV)-Infected Patient with Pneumocystis jirovecii Pneumonia

Cause Comments
Severe progressive pneumonia  
Side effects of therapy

Iatrogenic

Postbronchoscopy

Pneumothorax Copathology in lung Wrong diagnosis Inadequate therapy

CMV, cytomegalovirus; PCP, Pneumocystis pneumonia.

Treatment of Mycobacterial Diseases

Treatment of Tuberculosis

The treatment of HIV-related mycobacterial disease is complex. Not only do patients have to take prolonged courses of relatively toxic agents, but also these antimycobacterial drugs have side effects similar to those of other prescribed medications, especially those used for ART. Drug-drug interactions also are extremely common.

Type and Duration of Therapy for Tuberculosis

The optimal duration of treatment of tuberculosis, using a rifamycin-based regimen, in a patient who has HIV infection is unknown. Current recommendations from the BHIVA and the ATS/CDC/Infectious Diseases Society of North America (IDSA) are to treat tuberculosis in HIV-infected patients in the same way as for the general population (i.e., for 6 months for drug-sensitive pulmonary tuberculosis). In addition, ATS/CDC/IDSA guidelines recommend that treatment be extended to 9 months in patients who have cavitation on the original radiograph, continuing clinical signs, or a positive culture after 2 months of therapy.

Risk for development of rifampin monoresistance in HIV-infected patients receiving the drug has been reported. This association is especially strong if intermittent regimens are used and may be related to a lack of efficacy of the other drugs present in the combination (e.g., intermittent isoniazid). Hence, daily medication regimens are recommended and should be closely supervised in all HIV-positive patients. In clinical practice, rifabutin usually is given thrice weekly with ritonavir-boosted protease inhibitors. This regimen appears generally to achieve adequate rifamycin levels, although therapeutic drug failure and rifamycin resistance have recently been reported in patients who demonstrated appropriate adherence to prescribed treatment. Some clinicians now routinely prescribe daily rifabutin at its thrice-weekly dose and monitor drug levels. Little additional toxicity is reported, although the regimen is more expensive and has not been fully evaluated.

Directly observed therapy (DOT) is an important although fairly labor-intensive strategy that has the support of the WHO. It is of undoubted value in populations at risk for nonadherence, such as substance abusers, the homeless, and people with mental health problems, and can be integrated with addressing other health care needs. This approach can help to offset what might appear punitive to persons in DOT programs.

Timing of Initiation of Antiretroviral Therapy for Tuberculosis

Recent data are available that can guide the optimal time to start ART in patients being treated for tuberculosis. Initial decision analysis showed that early treatment with antiretroviral therapy led to a marked reduction in further opportunistic disease. Against this was balanced the risk of needing to discontinue antituberculosis therapy or ART because of drug toxicity or drug-drug interactions. IRIS was reported to be more likely if these treatments were started at the same time.

These findings have now been confirmed in several studies from around the world, predominantly in developing nations. In essence, deferred ART (i.e., given at least 8 weeks after starting antituberculosis therapy) was associated with significantly increased mortality, when compared to treatment started within 4 weeks. Although IRIS was several times more frequent in the latter population, its morbidity generally was manageable and mortality was low. The survival benefit of early treatment was most pronounced in post hoc analyses in subjects with the lowest CD4+ counts (that is, less than 50 cells/µL).

Delaying the start of antiretroviral therapy can simplify patient management and may reduce or prevent adverse drug reactions and drug-drug interactions; plus also reduce the risk of IRIS. Based on current guidance for general ART initiation, patients with CD4+ counts above 350 cells/µL, who are at low risk of HIV disease progression or death during 6 months of treatment for tuberculosis, could defer ART until treatment for tuberculosis is completed or well under way. In these patients, the CD4+ count should be closely monitored. In patients who have CD4+ counts of 349 to 100 cells/µL, many centers currently delay starting ART until after the first 2 months of treatment for tuberculosis have been completed, and patients are given concomitant PCP prophylaxis. In those with CD4+ counts below 99 cells/µL, ART is started as soon as possible after initiation of treatment for tuberculosis.

Two options exist for starting antiretroviral therapy in a patient already being treated for tuberculosis. First, the rifampin-based regimen is continued and ART is commenced—for example, with a combination of two nucleoside RTIs and a non-nucleoside RTI such as efavirenz (if the patient weighs more than 60 kg, the efavirenz dose often is increased to 800 mg given once daily, to compensate for rifampin-induced metabolism of efavirenz). Alternatively, the rifampin is stopped and rifabutin is started: Antiretroviral therapy is given, with a combination of two nucleoside RTI drugs and either a single ritonavir-boosted protease inhibitor or a non-nucleoside RTI. Here the dose of rifabutin is adjusted to take into account the pharmacokinetic effect of the coadministered drug. With a boosted protease inhibitor, it usually is prescribed at a dose of 150 mg thrice weekly, and with efavirenz, it is increased to 450 mg once a day, although as discussed earlier, some centers will use 150 mg rifabutin once daily.

Immune Reconstitution Inflammatory Syndrome

Before the advent of ART, physicians treating patients with tuberculosis recognized that an apparent response to the antimycobacterial treatment would sometimes be followed by a short period of clinical deterioration. This paradoxical reaction (in the context of overall treatment response) was seen as an interesting and probably immune-based phenomenon directed against residual mycobacterial antigen, of generally little consequence. The widespread introduction of ART has led to an increased awareness by clinicians of similar but generally more severe events in HIV-infected persons. In the context of HIV infection, a reaction of this type is now termed immune reconstitution inflammatory syndrome (IRIS), or immune reconstitution disease.

Such reactions can manifest in a number of ways, and in association with a range of opportunistic conditions. Perhaps the most common of these is similar to a paradoxical reaction. In this instance, after initiation of ART in a patient being treated for tuberculosis, for example, the original symptoms and signs or new features develop. These often are of an inflammatory nature and may be associated with marked radiographic changes. Manifestations of IRIS may include fever, dyspnea, lymphadenopathy, effusions, parenchymal pulmonary infiltrates, or expansion of cerebral tuberculomas. This form of IRIS is seen most frequently with disease due to mycobacteria (commonly M. tuberculosis or MAC), fungi (notably, Cryptococcus), and viruses (hepatitis viruses and Herpesviridae).

IRIS develops in up to one third of HIV-infected patients being treated for tuberculosis when ART is started. The median time to onset of tuberculosis-related IRIS is about 4 weeks from beginning antituberculosis treatment or 2 weeks from commencing ART. It appears to be more likely in patients who have disseminated tuberculosis (and hence presumably more stimulating antigen present as well as more potential for significant inflammatory reactions); and a lower baseline blood CD4+ count. A rapid fall in HIV load as well as a large increase in CD4+ counts in response to ART may also predict IRIS; as might circulating inflammatory cytokines such as interferon-γ or markers such as C-reactive protein. The relationship between early use of ART and low blood CD4+ counts suggests that care must be taken when antiretrovirals are started in patients with tuberculosis at sites where rapid expansion of an inflammatory mass could be life-threatening. Examples of this are cerebral, pericardial, or peritracheal disease (Figure 29-20).

image

Figure 29-20 Chest radiograph (A) and CT scan (B) showing massive mediastinal lymphadenopathy in a patient with IRIS due to Mycobacterium tuberculosis.

(Reproduced from Buckingham SJ, Haddow LJ, Shaw PJ, Miller RF: Immune reconstitution inflammatory syndrome in HIV-infected patients with mycobacterial infections starting highly active anti-retroviral therapy, Clin Radiol 59:505–513, 2004.)

An important point is that IRIS currently is a diagnosis of exclusion. No specific laboratory test is available to assist with this, and it should be made only after progressive or (multi)drug-resistant tuberculosis, poor drug adherence (to either antituberculosis or antiretroviral agents) and drug absorption, or an alternative pathologic process has been excluded as an explanation for the presentation. Criteria have been drawn up that seek to provide clinical diagnostic guidelines (Box 29-4).

The mechanism leading to IRIS is unclear. It is not due to failure of treatment of tuberculosis or to another coexistent disease process, and if anything it is most likely to represent an exuberant and uncontrolled response to mycobacterial antigens (from both dead and alive organisms).

Current treatments include nonsteroidal antiinflammatory drugs and glucocorticoids. The latter are undoubtedly effective although they can lead to hyperglycemia and hypertension. Recurrent aspiration of lymph nodes or effusion also may be needed. Although IRIS often is self-limiting, it may persist for several months. Rarely, temporary discontinuation of ART is required. In this situation there may be precipitous falls in CD4+ counts, and patients are at risk of other opportunistic infections.

Attention also has focused on an issue of possibly greater concern—the form of IRIS referred to as the “unmasking phenomenon”: In some persons with presumably latent tuberculosis infection who start ART, systemic active (and often infectious) tuberculosis develops within a 3-month period. Although the patient’s disease probably would have manifested in time anyway, and some reported cases may in fact represent progression of previously subclinical tuberculosis, reflecting ascertainment bias, the current view is that this phenomenon is real and constitutes an adverse effect of ART. In view of the fact that persons most at risk live in countries with limited facilities for pre-ART screening, this issue has major implications for ART rollout programs in resource-poor areas. It has led to heightened need for intensified screening using simple algorithms that seek to exclude mycobacterial infection and disease before institution of ART. One consequence of this added awareness is the increased use of regimens to treat LTBI, plus the increased detection of subclinical active tuberculosis cases.

Treatment of Fungal Infections

The treatment regimens for fungal infections complicating HIV infection are shown in Table 29-10.

Table 29-10 Treatment of Fungal Pulmonary Infection in Human Immunodeficiency Virus (HIV)-Infected Patients

Infectious Agent Drug Comments
Aspergillus spp. Voriconazole 6 mg/kg IV q12h on day 1, then 4 mg/kg IV q12h, then 200 mg PO q12h Change to oral therapy once evidence of clinical recovery
OR
Liposomal amphotericin 5 mg/kg IV q24h
Use for severely ill patients, monitor renal function
Cryptococcus neoformans Liposomal amphotericin 4-6 mg/kg IV q24h plus Monitor renal function
Flucytosine 50 mg/kg IV q6h for 2-4 weeks Monitor blood count, liver and renal function
OR
Fluconazole 300-400 mg PO q12h for 2-4 weeks
 
Histoplasma capsulatum Liposomal amphotericin 3 mg/kg IV q24h , then itraconazole 200 mg PO q8h for 3 days, then 200 mg PO q12h Use for severely ill patients
Monitor renal function
Change to oral therapy after 2 weeks or after clinical improvement obtained
Monitor itraconazole levels
Itraconazole 200 mg PO q8h for 3 days, then 200 mg PO q12h for 6-12 weeks Use for less severely unwell patients
Monitor itraconazole levels
Coccidioides immitis Amphotericin B 0.5-1 mg/kg q24h for 2-4 weeks
OR
Liposomal amphotericin 4 mg/kg IV q24h for 2-4 weeks
Monitor renal function
Penicillium marneffei Liposomal amphotericin 3 mg/kg IV q24h for 2 weeks, THEN
Itraconazole 400 mg PO q24h for 10 weeks
Use for severely ill patients
Monitor renal function
Monitor itraconazole levels
Itraconazole 400 mg PO q24h for 4-6 weeks Use for mild disease
Monitor itraconazole levels

Treatment of Parasitic Infections

The treatment regimens are shown in Table 29-11.

Table 29-11 Treatment of Parasitic Infections in Human Immunodeficiency Virus (HIV)-Infected Patients

Infectious Agent Drug Comments
Toxoplasma gondii    
First choice Sulfadiazine 1-1.5 g PO q6h plus pyrimethamine 200 mg PO q24h on day 1, then 50 mg (in patients weighing <60 kg) or 75 mg (in patients weighing >60 kg) plus folinic acid 15 mg PO q24h for 14-28 days Rash and fever are common
Second choice Clindamycin 600 mg PO or IV q6h plus pyrimethamine and folinic acid (doses as above) for 14-28 days If diarrhea develops, analyze stool for Clostridium difficile
Leishmania spp.    
First choice Liposomal amphotericin B 2-4 mg/kg IV q24h for 10 days  
Second choice Sodium stibogluconate 20 mg/kg IV or IM q24h for 3-4 weeks  
Strongyloides stercoralis Ivermectin 200 µg/kg PO q24h for 4 doses over 16 days  

Clinical Course and Prevention

Within the past several years, advances in drug therapy have radically altered the depressingly predictable nature of progressive HIV infection. Combinations of prophylaxis against specific opportunistic infections and ART can reduce both the incidence of common conditions and the associated mortality. The observational North American Multicenter AIDS Cohort Study (MACS) demonstrated that the risk of PCP in patients with blood CD4+ counts less than 100 cells/µL can be reduced almost four-fold (from 47% to 13%) if both specific prophylaxis and ART are taken. However, as common conditions are prevented, other less treatable illnesses may arise.

It has become apparent that specific infection prophylaxis also may confer protection against other agents. This “cross-prophylaxis” is seen particularly with the use of TMP-SMX for PCP which also provides cover against cerebral toxoplasmosis and several common bacterial infections (although not those caused by S. pneumoniae), and with use of macrolides for MAC infection, which further reduces the incidence of bacterial disease and also PCP. Use of large amounts of antibiotic raises the possibility of future widespread drug resistance. This concern clearly is of clinical import, and recent reports suggest that indeed in some parts of the world, the incidence of pneumococcal TMP-SMX resistance is rising. Current preventive therapies pertinent to lung disease focus on P. jirovecii, MAC, M. tuberculosis, and certain bacteria (Table 29-12).

Pneumocystis Jirovecii Pneumonia Prophylaxis

Numerous studies have demonstrated the greatly increased risk of PCP in persons with blood CD4+ counts below 200 cells/µL who do not take adequate drug therapy. Clinical symptoms also constitute an independent risk factor for PCP; accordingly, the current guidelines recommend lifelong prophylaxis against P. jirovecii in HIV-infected adults who have had previous PCP, CD4+ counts below 200 cells/µL, constitutional symptoms (documented oral thrush or fever of unknown cause with temperatures above 37.8° C that persists for more than 2 weeks), or clinical AIDS. The importance of secondary prophylaxis (i.e., used after an episode of PCP) becomes clear from historical data, which indicate a 60% risk of relapse in the first 12 months after infection.

The increases in systemic and local immunity that occur with ART have led to several studies evaluating the need for prolonged prophylaxis in persons with sustained elevations in blood CD4+ counts and low HIV RNA load. In summary, it appears that both primary and secondary PCP prophylaxis can be discontinued once CD4+ counts are above 200 cells/µL for more than 3 months. A caveat to this is that the patient should have a low or undetectable HIV RNA load, that the CD4+ percentage is stable or rising and is greater than 14% and that the patient plans to continue ART over the long term with good adherence.

Recent data accrued from a cohort study, a retrospective review and a case series show a low incidence of PCP among patients who discontinued or never started PCP prophylaxis, who were receiving ART and had CD4+ counts between 100 and 200 cells/µL and plasma HIV viral loads of less than 50 to 400 copies/mL. Although these data imply that primary PCP prophylaxis can be safely discontinued in certain patients with CD4+ counts between 100 and 200 cells/µL, with some experts recommending this approach for their patients, this has not been widely adopted.

Trimethoprim-Sulfamethoxazole

As with treatment strategies, TMP-SMX is the drug of choice for prophylaxis of PCP (Table 29-13). It has the advantages of being highly effective for both primary and secondary prophylaxis (with the 1-year risk of PCP during therapy with this agent being 1.5% and 3.5%, respectively). It is cheap, can be taken orally, acts systemically, and provides some cross-prophylaxis against other infections, such as toxoplasmosis and infections due to Salmonella spp., staphylococci, and H. influenzae. Its main disadvantage is that adverse reactions are common (see earlier), occurring in up to 50% of patients taking the prophylactic dose.

Table 29-13 Primary and Secondary Prophylaxis Regimens for Pneumocystis jirovecii Pneumonia

Drug Dose Comments
Trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole 1 double-strength* tablet PO q24h Other options for primary prophylaxis:
1 double-strength* tablet PO q24h 3×/week
OR
1 single-strength tablet PO q24h
Protects against toxoplasmosis and certain bacteria
Dapsone 100 mg PO q24h With pyrimethamine (25 mg PO q24h 3×/week)
Protects against toxoplasmosis
Pentamidine 300 mg given by Respirgard II (jet) nebulizer every 4 weeks Less effective in subjects with CD4+ <100 cells/µL
Provides no cross-prophylaxis
Atovaquone 750 mg PO q12h Absorption increased if administered with food
Protects against toxoplasmosis

* 160 mg trimethoprim plus 800 mg sulfamethoxazole.

80 mg trimethoprim plus 400 mg sulfamethoxazole.

The standard dose of TMP-SMX is one double-strength tablet (containing 160 mg of trimethoprim plus 800 mg of sulfamethoxazole) per day. Other regimens have been tried; these include one “double-strength” tablet thrice weekly and one single-strength tablet per day. In general, when used for primary prophylaxis, these regimens are tolerated well (if not better than the standard) and appear to be as efficacious as one double-strength tablet per day. The data are less clear in secondary prophylaxis, in which subjects are at a much higher risk for recurrent PCP. Attempts to desensitize patients who are intolerant of TMP-SMX have met with some success.

Bacterial Infection Prophylaxis

The effective and safe (i.e., replication-incompetent) bacterial vaccines that are available would be expected to be widely used to prevent HIV-related disease. In fact, clinical acceptance of both pneumococcal and the H. influenzae type b (Hib) vaccines is poor (current estimates for the former are at most only 40% of the infected population for use of the recommended 23-valent vaccine). One reason for this low uptake rate may be that the protection conferred by vaccination (90%) in the general population is not seen in immunosuppressed HIV-infected persons, reflecting their inability to generate adequate memory B cell responses (especially those with CD4+ counts below 200 cells/µL). In North America, however, the CDC/IDSA recommendation is to give the pneumococcal vaccine as a single dose as soon as HIV infection is diagnosed, with a booster at 5 years, or if an individual patient’s blood CD4+ count was less than 200 cells/µL and subsequently increased on ART. Several studies show that pneumococcal immunization reduces the risk of invasive pneumococcal infection in this population. This does not appear to be the case in a developing nation setting, where not only is the 23-valent vaccine ineffective against both invasive and noninvasive pneumococcal disease but the overall incidence of pneumonia is increased. Conjugated pneumococcal vaccines confer enhanced protection but are currently much more expensive. Cost-benefit analyses are awaited.

Infection with Hib is less common in HIV-infected adults. Accordingly, immunization with Hib vaccine is not routinely recommended.

There is little evidence to suggest that the high frequency of bacterial infections in the HIV population is related to bacterial colonization. Therefore, continuous antibiotics are rarely indicated, although both TMP-SMX and the macrolides (clarithromycin and azithromycin) given as long-term prophylaxis for opportunistic infection have been shown to reduce the incidence of bacterial pneumonia, sinusitis or otitis media, and infectious diarrhea. The use of TMP-SMX also confers a survival advantage in many studies performed in resource-poor settings. There is little evidence, however, showing that TMP-SMX protects against pneumococcal infection.

Mycobacterium Tuberculosis Prophylaxis

The interaction between HIV and tuberculosis is of fundamental importance because the annual risk for the development of clinical tuberculosis in a given patient is estimated to be 5% to 15% (i.e., similar to a non–HIV-infected subject’s lifetime risk). The concern that HIV-infected patients may develop disseminated infection after bacillus Calmette-Guerin (BCG) administration means that despite its undoubted potential protective value in many parts of the world where HIV infection is rife, clinicians may be wary of using it routinely. As such, effective case finding (largely for active infectious disease, though increasingly for LTBI) becomes even more relevant to tuberculosis control. The distinction between LTBI (i.e., clinically asymptomatic disease with a normal appearance on the chest radiograph and negative mycobacterial sputum cultures) and active tuberculosis disease is distorted by HIV. M. tuberculosis can be isolated from asymptomatic persons, while active disease symptom screens are so all-encompassing that they are poorly specific.

HIV-infected patients with pulmonary tuberculosis are less likely to be AFB smear–positive than their HIV-negative counterparts, although they are still infectious and can transmit tuberculosis. One of the problems with standard methods of tuberculosis contact tracing when applied to HIV infected subjects is that both TST results and chest radiology may be unreliable. However, in the absence of BCG immunization, a positive PPD (e.g., greater than 5 mm induration with 5 tuberculin units) indicates a greatly increased risk of future active disease (6- to 23-fold compared with nonanergic, PPD-negative, HIV-infected subjects).

The introduction of commercial mycobacterial interferon gamma release assays (IGRAs), which are highly sensitive indicators of mycobacterial infection and are reasonably specific for detection of M. tuberculosis (although unaffected by BCG), has renewed interest in screening strategies for LTBI. The tests have some clear advantages over TST (including reducing false positives due to BCG, less potential for reporter error when the TST is read, and no need for a return visit by the subject under investigation if the IGRA result is negative). Because IGRAs detect host immunity, however, they are inevitably affected by HIV infection and are less sensitive in subjects with declining immunity (and low blood CD4+ counts). They cannot discriminate between recent and past infection, so they yield a positive result in large numbers of people in tuberculosis-endemic areas. They do not test for active disease, and results generally do not revert to negative after successful treatment of LTBI or active tuberculosis. In low-tuberculosis-prevalence settings, such as the United States and the United Kingdom, IGRAs may offer a cost-effective means of identifying persons who are at high risk for development of active tuberculosis and hence should be offered LTBI treatment.

The WHO recommends at least 6 months of isoniazid (together with pyridoxine to prevent peripheral neuropathy). This drug is safe and well-tolerated, although compliance is a problem (especially if treatment is for longer than 6 months). There is little evidence to suggest that this single-agent regimen leads to isoniazid resistance, which probably reflects the low mycobacterial load present in such patients. In view of the concerns regarding undertreatment of subclinical active disease, however, some workers are now advocating use of molecular diagnostic methods as part of an initial screen before initiation of LTBI therapy.

Recent studies performed in tuberculosis-endemic settings have shown useful and comparable efficacy of rifapentine plus isoniazid weekly for 3 months, or twice-weekly rifampin and isoniazid also for 3 months, and of 6 months or longer of isoniazid alone. A 36-month monotherapy regimen of isoniazid was superior to a 6-month regimen in a study performed in Botswana. Of note, the benefit of treatment (in preventing the development of active disease) was apparent only in subjects who were TST-positive before LTBI treatment, suggesting that the longer course was not merely preventing exogenous, newly acquired infection.

Secondary LTBI prophylaxis after treatment for active disease generally is not recommended, because ART will reduce the risk of tuberculosis by 50% to 80% after 3 months of therapy and should be encouraged. ART also appears to have an additive (and similar-sized) effect to that of specific antituberculosis therapy in reducing the risk of progression to tuberculosis disease during primary prophylaxis.

Prognosis

Pneumocystis Jirovecii Pneumonia

Several clinical and laboratory features have prognostic significance in HIV-infected patients with PCP (Box 29-5). Severity scores based on the patient’s age, use of injection drugs, serum albumin, serum bilirubin, and PO2(A−a), or the patient’s age, hemoglobin, PaO2, presentation with a second or third episode of PCP, the presence of medical comorbidity and of pulmonary Kaposi sarcoma can predict survival reasonably accurately, with the highest scores indicating the worst outcome. In the era of ART the mortality from an episode of PCP is approximately 10%.

Controversies and Pitfalls

Antiretroviral Therapy and Opportunistic Infections

The introduction of ART, together with the wide availability of accurate methods of determining plasma RNA viral load, has led to profound changes in both clinical practice and outcome with HIV disease. Respiratory disease, in particular, bacterial pneumonia and tuberculosis, still occurs more frequently than in HIV-seronegative subjects, despite apparently effective ART. Overall, however, data indicate that clinical progression is rare in subjects who are able to adhere rigorously to at least 95% of their antiretroviral drug regimen. Mortality rates have fallen by 80% for almost all conditions, and it seems that a damaged immune system can, to a clinically significant extent, be reconstituted for a period of at least several years. Thus, clinicians need to consider not only opportunistic infection or malignancy within the diagnostic workup but also the effects of drug therapy itself. The adverse effect profile of ART (e.g., metabolic and mitochondrial toxicities, liver damage, and neuropsychiatric disorders), as well as the large number of drug-drug interactions, makes this a highly complex area of clinical management. The best-characterized example of this issue is HIV-related tuberculosis. Here, not only is there overlap between toxicity and pharmacologic interaction, but IRIS is common. Research is needed to address this area. Studies should inform the decision on when to start ART in patients already on antituberculosis medication: For example, should ART begin at much higher blood CD4+ counts than those currently recommended? What are good and simple predictors of an individual patient’s risk for IRIS? Other work needs to focus on elucidation of why full pulmonary immunity is not restored with ART.

Predictors of Disease

Despite the benefits of ART, it is likely that in the long term, HIV infection will progress to severe disease. Currently, little work has been conducted in this area. Research should focus on developing strategies that are cost-effective and practicable in both high and low tuberculosis burden settings. This is important, because in the latter, respiratory disease such as tuberculosis remains a common problem, even in subjects of known HIV serostatus. For example, recent U.K. guidance on screening for LTBI in HIV infection has not been evaluated at a national level.

As discussed previously, immune-based tests have shown promise in immunocompetent patients with LTBI. If these tests can be refined to work consistently in HIV infection at a reasonable cost, the possibility emerges for targeting persons at risk for future tuberculosis, or for predicting tuberculosis “unmasking” after initiation of ART. The recent descriptions of whole genome sequencing and microarrays of host immune signatures to distinguish LTBI from active disease are important in this respect.

Rapid diagnostics that are not exorbitant in cost and complexity are urgently needed. A common clinical scenario is that in which the patient presents with nonspecific signs and symptoms potentially associated with any of numerous entities in an extensive differential diagnosis. Often, the best treatment regimen is multiple and empirical—as, for example, in a patient from an endemic tuberculosis area with low blood CD4+ counts who has both pulmonary and central nervous system disease: Is the clinical problem tuberculosis, toxoplasmosis, cryptococcosis, or viral or bacterial infection? Any such test for tuberculosis would also have to distinguish between the different states of old (treated), old (inactive), old (latent) and active. Although not insurmountable, at present, such distinction is not possible. Some encouraging data have been derived from urine lipoarabinomannan (LAM) assays, which are of less value in HIV-negative subjects than in the HIV-infected. This difference is due to the large amount of renally cleared LAM associated with the overall increased bacterial load present in HIV-related tuberculosis. Utilizing such specific aspects of tuberculosis or HIV pathology may encourage development of novel and specific tests.

Rapid diagnostic assays that assess organism viability also are important. If the clinician can receive early feedback on whether treatment is producing a suitable killing effect, then therapy can be tailored to the individual patient. This feedback enables regimens to be “dose-adjusted” as needed and removes the element of concern that often is present when patients are slow to respond. Such delayed response is well recognized in the treatment of PCP or other fungal or mycobacterial disease, for example.

Mycobacterial Diseases

M. tuberculosis is globally the most important HIV-related pathogen. Strategies of control and prevention are vital to ensure that millions of people do not become co-infected and that those who are do not go on to develop clinical disease. Rapid diagnostics are critical. The encouraging reports of the simple and cheap MODS assay and also user-friendly molecular techniques, both to diagnose tuberculosis and then to provide resistance data in field settings (see earlier), argue for large-scale rollout and evaluation.

Beyond public health measures such as infection control, rapid case finding, DOTs, use of fixed-dose combination drugs, case management, and education, research needs to improve on current drug therapy. Long-acting preparations such as rifapentine show promise but, as the problem with rifampicin monoresistance demonstrates, much work remains to be done. Several antimycobacterial drugs are now in clinical trials. Initial data are promising, and several agents have novel mechanisms of action. The Global Alliance and the WHO “Stop TB” campaigns have been crucial in this regard. The fluoroquinolones moxifloxacin and gatifloxacin are now widely available. These potent drugs possess considerable ability both to kill mycobacteria and also to “sterilize” infected sites. Trials of treatment-shortening regimens are ongoing worldwide. These drugs also are important as part of treatment protocols and stratagems that will effectively tackle the estimated 500,000 new cases of MDR tuberculosis, in addition to benefiting the 50,000 persons who have currently almost untreatable XDR tuberculosis across the world.

Vaccination against M. tuberculosis using BCG has been attempted with caution in immunosuppressed HIV-infected populations. However, a safe vaccine may be the only affordable way of protecting large parts of the world from tuberculosis. So far there appears to be more success with vaccines to either enhance or replace the primary protective effects of BCG.