Pulmonary Function Testing

Published on 12/06/2015 by admin

Filed under Pulmolory and Respiratory

Last modified 22/04/2025

Print this page

rate 1 star rate 2 star rate 3 star rate 4 star rate 5 star
Your rating: none, Average: 5 (2 votes)

This article have been viewed 3286 times

4 Pulmonary Function Testing

Note 1: This book is written to cover every item listed as testable on the Entry Level Examination (ELE), Written Registry Examination (WRE), and Clinical Simulation Examination (CSE).

The listed code for each item is taken from the National Board for Respiratory Care’s (NBRC) Summary Content Outline for CRT and Written RRT Examinations (http://evolve.elsevier.com/Sills/resptherapist/). For example, if an item is testable on both the ELE and WRE, it is shown simply as (Code: …). If an item is testable only on the ELE, it is shown as (ELE code: …). If an item is testable only on the WRE, it is shown as (WRE code: …).

Following each item’s code, the difficulty level is indicated for the questions on that item on the ELE and WRE. (See the Introduction for a full explanation of the three question difficulty levels.) Recall [R] level questions typically expect the exam taker to recall factual information. Application [Ap] level questions are more difficult, because the exam taker may have to apply factual information to a clinical situation. Analysis [An] level questions are the most challenging, because the exam taker may have to use critical thinking to evaluate patient data to make a clinical decision.

Note 2: A review of the most recent Entry Level Examinations (ELE) has shown that an average of 7 questions out of 140 (or 5% of the exam) covers pulmonary function testing. A review of the most recent Written Registry Examinations (WRE) has shown that an average of 4 questions out of 100 (or 4% of the exam) covers pulmonary function testing. The Clinical Simulation Examination (CSE) is comprehensive and may include everything that should be known by an advanced-level respiratory therapist.

MODULE A

MODULE B

1. Perform bedside spirometry tests

2. Tidal volume

d. Monitor inspiratory/expiratory ratio (WRE code: IA7c) [Difficulty: ELE: R; WRE: Ap]

The I : E ratio is the ratio of the patient’s inspiratory time to the expiratory time. It can be simply measured at the bedside with a stopwatch. Again, make sure the patient is relaxed and breathing in the normal pattern to get an accurate timing. Measure several of the patient’s inspiratory times and expiratory times to figure an average for each. A spirometer that gives a printout is needed if a more complete analysis of the patient’s breathing pattern is necessary.

A normal, spontaneously breathing patient has an I : E ratio of 1 : 2 to 1 : 4. A prolonged inspiratory time often is seen in patients with an upper airway obstruction. A prolonged expiratory time often is seen in patients with asthma or chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). Any abnormal I : E ratio should be investigated. For example, patients with Kussmaul’s respiration, Cheyne-Stokes respiration, or Biot’s respiration will have unusual I : E ratios.

4. Alveolar ventilation

5. Maximum inspiratory pressure

a. Perform the procedure (Code: IB79n [Difficulty: ELE: R, Ap; WRE: An]

The maximum inspiratory pressure (MIP) is the greatest amount of negative pressure the patient can create when inspiring against an occluded airway. It also is known as negative inspiratory force (NIF). The following factors affect the test results: strength of the diaphragm and accessory muscles of inspiration, lung volume when the airway is occluded, ventilatory drive, and the length of time the airway is occluded. MIP is most commonly used to determine the weanability of mechanically ventilated patients. In addition, it is used to help monitor the strength of patients with a neuromuscular disease.

A study of the literature reveals that a number of measurement devices have been assembled and that different bedside techniques have been used to determine the effort of a patient breathing naturally, an intubated patient, and a patient breathing with assistance from a mechanical ventilator. Branson and colleagues (1989) and Kacmarek and colleagues (1989) make a strong case for the use of a double one-way valve to connect the intubated patient to the manometer (Figure 4-2). Use of the one-way valve lets the patient exhale but prevents an inhalation when the practitioner occludes the opening. This forces the patient to inhale from closer to residual volume with each breathing effort. These researchers also recommend that the patient make inspiratory efforts for 15 to 20 seconds.

Steps in the MIP procedure for a normally breathing patient include the following:

6. Maximum expiratory pressure

a. Perform the procedure (Code: IB9n) [Difficulty: ELE: R, Ap; WRE: An]

The maximum expiratory pressure (MEP) is the greatest amount of positive pressure the patient can create when expiring from total lung capacity (TLC) against an occluded airway. It also is known as a maximum expiratory force (MEF). The following factors affect the test results: patient cooperation and effort, strength of the expiratory muscles, lung volume when the airway is occluded, ventilatory drive, and the length of time the airway is occluded. The MEP is used to determine the weanability of mechanically ventilated patients and to monitor the strength of patients with a neuromuscular disease.

As with the MIP test, a study of the literature reveals that a number of measurement devices have been assembled and that different bedside techniques have been used to determine the effort of a patient breathing naturally and the effort of one who is intubated and breathing by way of a mechanical ventilator. A strong case can be made for the use of a double one-way valve to connect the intubated patient to the manometer (see Figure 4-2). Use of the one-way valves lets the patient inhale but prevents an exhalation when the practitioner occludes the expiratory opening. This forces the patient to exhale from closer to TLC with each breathing effort. However, the expiratory efforts should not be held for longer than 3 seconds. This test is similar to the Valsalva maneuver and can cause a reduction in cardiac output because of the high intrathoracic pressure.

Steps in the MEP procedure for a normally breathing patient include the following:

It is important to monitor any patient for signs of undue stress and hypoxemia, such as tachycardia, bradycardia, ventricular dysrhythmias, hypotension, and decreasing saturation on pulse oximetry. If any of these is seen, the procedure should be stopped and the patient reoxygenated and ventilated.

7. Vital capacity

b. Interpret the results (Code: IB10d) [Difficulty: ELE: R, Ap; WRE: An]

See Figure 4-1 for a graphic tracing of a nonforced VC. Compare it with the tracing on Figure 4-3, which shows a forced vital capacity (FVC). In a patient without obstructive lung disease, the same volume should be found in a nonforced VC and an FVC. A patient with asthma or chronic obstructive lung disease may have a smaller FVC than nonforced VC because of small airway collapse during the maximum effort. The following discussion on the FVC includes predicted values for male and female patients and guidelines on the interpretation.

9. Peak flow

b. Interpret the results (Code: IB10e) [Difficulty: ELE: R, Ap; WRE: An]

The peak flow and FEV1 are the bedside measurements most commonly used to evaluate the response of a patient with asthma or COPD to inhaled bronchodilator medications. If the medication dose is effective, the patient’s peak flow will increase significantly from the premedication value. Many peak flowmeters come with adjustable markers for the National Asthma Education Program’s “color zone” scheme:

Current asthma guidelines state that if an asthma patient’s peak flow is in the green zone, the medications are adequately controlling the asthma. If the peak flow is in the yellow zone, the patient’s medications are not adequately controlling the asthma. Increased doses are indicated if ordered by the physician. If the peak flow is in the red zone, the patient’s medications are not adequately controlling the asthma. The patient needs more bronchodilator medication. The home care patient should get medical help as soon as possible. Each patient should have his or her individually calculated color zones marked on the peak flowmeter to guide medication usage. The patient should be instructed on the meaning of the zones and the proper use of medications. See Module C for more discussion of the peak flow.

MODULE C

2. Exhaled nitric oxide

3. Forced vital capacity

a. Perform the test (Code: IB9e and IIIE7a) [Difficulty: ELE: R, Ap; WRE: An]

The FVC is the greatest volume of gas that the patient can exhale as rapidly as possible after the lungs have been completely filled. Normally, the FVC is the same volume as that found in a slow or nonforced VC. Careful instructions, demonstrations, and coaching are needed to ensure that the patient’s efforts are the best possible. At least three proper efforts must be obtained.

If the measurement instrument does not give a printout, simply record the patient’s efforts in the chart. If the measurement instrument does give a printout, include copies of the efforts. See Figure 4-3 for the tracing of a properly performed FVC. The tracing allows comparison of the volumes exhaled in a series of 1-second intervals. Because of this, the tracing often is referred to as a volume-time curve. Note that the start of the effort is smooth and without interruption. The initial fast flow of gas from the upper airway is seen as the nearly vertical part of the tracing. The rest of the tracing is smooth without any coughing or other interruptions in the patient’s effort. The tracing becomes progressively more horizontal as the end of the effort is reached. Encourage the patient to try to push out as much air as possible as the end approaches. To provide an acceptable FVC, the patient must show maximum effort without coughing or closing the glottis, and the expiratory effort must last at least 6 seconds. The patient’s final 2 seconds of expiratory effort should show no appreciable airflow. Each of the three acceptable FVCs must show these traits and close similarity of the patient’s efforts.

b. Interpret FVC and spirometry graphics

Figure 4-3 was made on a chain-compensated, water-seal spirometry system. Note how the tracing progresses from the right to the left. The Stead-Wells system shows the same tracing “upside down” compared with the chain-compensated system. The tracing starts on the left and moves to the right (Figures 4-4 and 4-5). Other tracings may show either the chain-compensated or the Stead-Wells tracings in a mirror image or opposite shape.

c. Interpret the results (Code: IB10e and IIIE7a) [Difficulty: ELE: R, Ap; WRE: An]

Normal racial differences in the FVC must be taken into consideration. Most modern pulmonary function systems automatically adjust the measured values for racial differences when so programmed by the operator. If not, the predicted values should be mathematically adjusted by the therapist. The predicted normal values, in liters, for the FVC in Caucasian patients were reported by Morris, Koski, and Johnson (1971) as:*

image

African Americans are known to have a smaller lung capacity than Caucasians of the same height. For this reason, a 10% to 15% adjustment should be made for the predicted FVC and TLC of an African American patient. In other words, the predicted values for this patient are 85% to 90% of those of a comparable Caucasian patient.

Adjustments for Hispanic and Asian populations are not so well documented. It has been reported that the predicted FVC values should be adjusted downward by 20% to 25% for Asians.

It has been commonly accepted that a measured FVC at least 80% of the predicted FVC is considered to be within normal limits for adults of all races. In addition, the FEV1 and TLC measurements have been included in this 80% of predicted rule. More recent studies by Knudson, Kaltenborn, Knudson, and associates (1987) and Paoletti, Viegi, Pistelli, and associates (1985) suggest that normal values for most tests should be determined by finding the percentage of predicted value above which 95% of the population would be seen (the so-called normal 95th percentile). Even though this method finds 5% (1 in 20) of healthy nonsmokers to be abnormal, it offers more realistic predicted values. It is normal to see a decline in the FVC with age.

Restrictive problems, such as advanced pregnancy, obesity, ascites, neuromuscular disease, sarcoidosis, and chest wall or spinal deformity, can result in a small FVC. Patients with chronic obstructive lung diseases, such as emphysema, bronchitis, asthma, cystic fibrosis, and bronchiectasis, commonly have a small FVC. (Figure 4-5 shows a comparison of the spirometry tracings of a normal, an obstructed, and a restricted patient.)

The limitations of this text prevent a discussion of back-extrapolation to find the start of a less than perfect effort or the calculations for correcting volumes and flows from atmospheric temperature, pressure, saturated (ATPS) to body temperature, pressure, saturated (BTPS). However, most textbooks on pulmonary function testing discuss these topics. Because the BTPS correction reflects the patient’s true effort, it is standard practice to report all flows and volumes in BTPS.

4. Peak flow

b. Interpret the results (Code: IB10d) [Difficulty: ELE: R, Ap; WRE: An]

The PF is directly related to height and indirectly related to age. Therefore, the taller the patient, the greater the PF. The PF decreases with age. The PF is a rather nonspecific measurement of airway obstruction. It measures flow through the upper airways and is reduced in patients with an upper airway problem, such as a tumor, vocal cord paralysis, or laryngeal edema.

The PF test is most often given to patients having an asthma attack as a quick and easy measurement of small airway obstruction. Current asthma guidelines state that if the peak flow of a patient with asthma is 80% to 100% of predicted or personal best, he or she is in the green zone. This means that the patient’s medications are adequately controlling the asthma. If the peak flow is 50% to 79% of predicted or personal best, he or she is in the yellow zone. This means that the patient’s medications are not adequately controlling the asthma. Increased doses are indicated if ordered by the physician. If the peak flow is less than 50% of predicted or personal best, the patient is in the red zone. This means that the patient’s medications are not adequately controlling the asthma. The patient should get medical help as soon as possible.

It is the respiratory therapist’s responsibility to calculate the patient’s color zones and mark them on the patient’s personal peak flowmeter. The therapist must instruct the patient in the meaning of the color zones and the appropriate use of the prescribed inhaled bronchodilator and/or corticosteroid medications.

Timed forced expiratory volume tests

All of the timed forced expiratory volume tests are derived from a properly performed FVC test (see Figure 4-3). When the FVC is done correctly, the following values can be properly calculated and evaluated to determine the patient’s condition. As discussed earlier, an FVC within 80% of predicted is interpreted as within normal limits. Therefore, if the results of the following tests show patient values within 80% of predicted, the results are interpreted as being within normal limits.

5. Forced expiratory flow25%-75% (FEF25%-75%)

6. Forced expiratory volume timed (FEVT)

a. Perform the procedure (Code: IB9u) [Difficulty: ELE: R, Ap; WRE: An]

The FEVT is the volume of air exhaled from an acceptable FVC in the specified time. The time increments are 0.5, 1, 2, and 3 seconds or more and are listed as FEV0.5, FEV1, FEV2, FEV3, and so on. It is important that the FVC have a good start and a maximum effort to the end.

The FEV1 is the measurement most commonly used, along with the FVC, to judge the patient’s response to inhaled bronchodilators, for bronchoprovocation testing to screen for asthmatic tendencies, to detect exercise-induced asthma, and for simple screening. BTPS correct all the measured values.

The timed forced expiratory volumes (FEV0.5, FEV1, FEV2, FEV3) effectively “cut” the FVC into sections based on how much volume the patient forcibly exhales in 0.5, 1, 2, and 3 seconds. Some patients with severe obstructive lung disease require several more seconds to exhale completely. In these cases, simply keep measuring the volume exhaled in each additional second. Figure 4-7 shows an FVC tracing that is subdivided at 0.5-, 1-, 2-, and 3-second intervals. Some bedside units give a numeric value for some or all of the timed intervals; however, it is best to have a spirometer that produces a printed copy of the patient’s FVC effort. The individual volumes can be determined by marking the vertical distance on the volume scale from the baseline (total lung capacity) to the respective arrow tips.

image

Figure 4-7 Forced vital capacity divided into FEV0.5, FEV1.0, FEV2.0, and FEV3.0.

(From Ruppel G: Manual of pulmonary function testing, ed 4, St Louis, 1986, Mosby.)

7. Forced expiratory volume/forced vital capacity ratio (FEVT/FVC or FEVT%)

8. Spirometry before and after inhalation of an aerosolized bronchodilator

9. Bronchoprovocation studies

a. Perform the procedure (Code: IIIE7f) [Difficulty: ELE: R, Ap; WRE: An]

A bronchoprovocation study (also known as bronchial provocation) is indicated when a patient has a history indicating asthma or hyperactive airways yet has normal spirometry testing. This means that the patient’s FVC and FEV1 from the forced vital capacity are within normal limits. Other indications for a bronchoprovocation study include assessing the severity of airway hyperresponsiveness; evaluating the risk of asthma developing, including occupational asthma; assessing the effectiveness of medications to control the patient’s asthma; and excluding asthma during a diagnostic workup.

The most common testing regimen involves having the patient inhale increasingly higher doses of nebulized methacholine (a cholinergic [parasympathetic] drug) and measuring spirometry results. Because of this, the procedure may be referred to as a methacholine challenge test. Occasionally, other factors, such as cold air exercising; inhaling an histamine; or inhaling a targeted antigen, such as animal dander, are substituted for methacholine. In addition, to evaluate the effectiveness of asthmacontrolling medications, the physician may order that they be withheld for a specified period. The following discussion is limited to inhaled methacholine.

Testing should not be performed on an at-risk patient, such as someone who (1) has an FEV1 of less than 50% of predicted, (2) has had a stroke or heart attack within the past 3 months, (3) has uncontrolled hypertension, or (4) has a known aortic or cerebral aneurysm. Remember, above all, that a positive test result indicates that the patient has some level of bronchospasm.

The basic procedure is as follows:

If the patient is normal, continue as follows:

10. Flow-volume loops

b. Interpret the results (Code: IB10u) [Difficulty: ELE: R, Ap; WRE: An]

Flow-volume loops have gained great popularity, because the shape of the curve is diagnostic of the patient’s condition. In addition, the peak inspiratory and peak expiratory flows can be determined. If the effort can be timed, all the parameters found on the previously discussed volume-time curves can be found on the flow-volume loop. The following examples show a normal flow-volume loop and representative abnormal loops.

1. Normal

A normal flow-volume loop is shown in Figures 4-8 and 4-9. First look at Figure 4-8, in which the various volumes are measured on the horizontal scale. The tidal volume (VT) of 500 mL is the small loop within the larger VC loop. The ERV and IRV are shown on both sides of the tidal volume. The FVC is shown as the total of all three volumes. Finally, TLC and residual volume (RV) are marked.

Figure 4-9 shows the same normal flow-volume loop in which the various flows are measured on the vertical scale. Starting from TLC with the FEVC, the peak expiratory flow rate is seen as the greatest flow generated; it is about 9 L/sec. Starting from RV with the FIVC, the peak inspiratory flow rate is seen as the greatest flow that is generated; it is about 7 L/sec. It is normal for the PEFR to be greater than the PIFR.

To find the instantaneous flow at any FVC lung volume, the FVC must be divided by 4 to find the 25th, 50th, and 75th percentile points. In Figure 4-8, the FVC is 4,800 mL. Dividing by 4 gives 1,200 mL per quarter of the FVC. These points are marked on the horizontal volume scale. If a vertical (dashed) line is drawn through these three points to the flow-volume tracing, the instantaneous flows at these volumes can be found. Expiratory flows are reported as follows:

Inspiratory flows are reported in this way:

The PEFR and FEF25 or image values should be about the same, because they all measure flow through the large upper airways. Either test is a good gauge of the patient’s effort, because it will be low if the patient is not trying hard. The FEF50 or image values should approximate the FEF25%-75% values, because they both show flow through the medium to small airways in the middle half of the FVC effort. It is normal for the FIF50 to be greater than the FEF50. The FEF75 or image values are the best indicator of early small airway disease because both show flow through the small airways as the patient approaches the residual volume. Note that the tracing from the FEF25 or image point to the residual volume is close to a straight line. In normal patients, the flow decreases in proportion to the decreasing lung volume, resulting in the straight-line tracing. Cherniack and Raber (1972) published formulas for predicting adult MEFV flows in liters per second; see the bibliography.

2. Small airway disease

Examples of conditions that result in disease in the small airways (i.e., those less than 2 mm in diameter) include asthma, chronic bronchitis, bronchiectasis, cystic fibrosis, and emphysema. The obstruction can be from bronchospasm, mucus plugging, or damage to the alveoli and small airways, leading to their collapse on expiration.

Figure 4-10 shows representative flow-volume loops for patients with asthma and emphysema superimposed over a normal flow-volume loop. Note that both loops are shifted to the left, toward the TLC, because the residual volumes are increased. Also note that the flows are decreased more than normal as the patient exhales closer to the residual volume. This “scooped out” appearance is very characteristic of small airway disease. Having the patient inhale a bronchodilator and repeating the flow-volume loop shows the degree of reversibility. Some computer-based systems allow the before and after bronchodilator loops to be superimposed to show further the amount of improvement.

image

Figure 4-10 A series of abnormal flow-volume loop tracings superimposed over a dashed-line tracing of a normal loop.

(From Ruppel G: Manual of pulmonary function testing, ed 9, St Louis, 2009, Mosby.)

4. Variable intrathoracic obstruction

A variable intrathoracic obstruction can be caused by a tumor or foreign body that partly blocks a bronchus. Figure 4-10 shows a representative flow-volume curve. Note that the FVC volume is almost normal, with a greatly decreased peak expiratory flow rate.

6. Fixed obstruction

A fixed obstruction usually is caused by a tumor in the trachea or a mainstem bronchus. Figure 4-10 shows a representative flow-volume loop. Again, the FVC volume is close to normal. Note the abnormally reduced inspiratory and expiratory flow rates. The tracing looks almost squared off, with the FEF50% and FIF50% values being about the same.

11. Maximum voluntary ventilation

b. Interpret the results (Code: IB10u) [Difficulty: ELE: R, Ap; WRE: An]

The results of the MVV test are among the most difficult to evaluate. This is because the patient’s effort, the condition of the respiratory muscles, lung and thoracic compliance, neurologic control over the drive to breathe, and airway and tissue resistance all have an influence. Abnormalities in any of these can cause the MVV to decrease. Because more than one problem can exist, a decreased MVV does not point out the exact difficulty. A healthy young man can have an MVV of 150 to 200 L/min. Women tend to have smaller values, and the values of both genders decrease with age. Because of the many factors involved in the MVV, normal predicted values may vary by as much as ± 30%. Therefore, unless the MVV is less than 70% of predicted, the patient cannot really be considered abnormal.

Cherniack and Raber (1972) published the following equations* for predicting the MVV in liters per minute:

image

The following considerations are important in the evaluation of an abnormally low MVV value:

Despite these difficulties in determining the cause of a decreased MVV value, doing so has proven helpful in preoperative evaluation and cardiopulmonary stress testing. Any patient with a lower than normal MVV value is at an increased risk of postoperative atelectasis and pneumonia. The risks of pulmonary complications related to MVV are low when the patient reaches 75% to 50% of predicted, moderate when the patient reaches 50% to 33% of predicted, and high when the patient reaches less than 33% of predicted. Patients with known moderate to severe COPD usually have to stop exercise testing because of their inability to breathe. An MVV value of less than 50 L/min is a good predictor of this.

12. Single-breath nitrogen washout test and closing volume

Note: This test is not listed in the NBRC’s detailed content outlines. However, questions about the test have been included in recent versions of the Written Registry Examination.

b. Interpret the results (Code: IB10u) [Difficulty: ELE: R, Ap; WRE: An]

Figure 4-12 shows a normal tracing, which shows these phases:

The start of phase IV is called the closing volume (CV). It marks the lung volume when small airway closure begins and is an early indicator of small airway disease. CV does not occur in healthy young adults until after about 80% to 90% of the VC has been exhaled. The closing capacity (CC) is found by adding the closing volume to the residual volume (found by another test). Healthy young adults have a CC that is about 30% of their TLC.

Problems can be indicated as follows: increases in the ΔN2 750-1250, the slope of phase III, and especially early onset of phase IV; increased closing volume; and increased closing capacity. The diseases or conditions that can cause these abnormal test results are small airway disease, congestive heart failure with pulmonary edema, and obesity.

13. Functional residual capacity by the helium dilution method

Note: This test is not listed in the NBRC’s detailed content outlines. However, questions about interpretation of the results of lung volume tests have been included in recent versions of the Written Registry Examination.

a. Perform the procedure (Code: IIIE7c) [Difficulty: ELE: R, Ap; WRE: An]

The functional residual capacity (FRC) is the volume of gas left in the lungs at the end of a normal expiration. It cannot be measured through spirometry. The FRC is needed to calculate a patient’s residual volume (RV) and TLC. It is necessary to know a patient’s RV, FRC, and TLC to diagnose and determine the severity of obstructive lung disease and restrictive lung disease.

The helium (He) dilution method basically involves diluting the resident gases in the lungs (mainly nitrogen and oxygen) with helium to mathematically determine the FRC. This also is called the closed-circuit method, because the patient and circuit are sealed off. Figure 4-13 shows a schematic drawing of the components that make up the circuit. These include a two-way valve to switch the patient from breathing room air to the helium mix, soda lime to absorb the patient’s exhaled carbon dioxide from the circuit, a combined carbon dioxide (CO2) and water vapor absorber to prevent these gases from entering the helium analyzer, the helium analyzer, a variable speed blower to move the gases through the circuit, a spirometer for monitoring tidal volumes, an attached kymograph to trace the patient’s breathing pattern, and an oxygen supply to meet the patient’s needs. The helium supply is not shown.

image

Figure 4-13 Schematic drawing of the key components of a helium dilution system for measuring functional residual capacity.

(From Beauchamp RK: Pulmonary function testing procedures. In Barnes TA, editor: Respiratory care practice, St Louis, 1988, Mosby.)

It is beyond the scope of this text to cover all the steps in the helium dilution test; however, the following features of the procedure are important to know. Add enough helium to the room air in the circuit to create a 10% to 15% He mix. At the end of a normal exhalation, the patient is switched to breathing the mix so that the FRC can be determined. The patient breathes the gas mix until the helium is evenly distributed throughout the lungs and the helium percentage is stable. Typically, the test is performed for up to 7 minutes, if needed, to reach an equilibrium point. Extending the test longer may help to reach a stable equilibrium point in abnormal patients. The calculation of RV is rather complex and usually is done through the computer built into the pulmonary function system. Spirometry also must be performed, because the ERV is subtracted from the FRC to find the RV. Commonly the test is repeated. The patient should be allowed to breathe room air for 5 minutes between tests to clear the helium from the lungs. Patients with severe obstructive lung disease may need more time. Bates, Macklem, and Christie (1971) published the following equations* for calculating the normal FRC in liters:

image

Goldman and Becklake (1959) published the following equations* for calculating the normal RV in liters:

image

b. Interpret the results (Code: IIIE7c) [Difficulty: ELE: R, Ap; WRE: An]

A normal young man has an FRC volume of about 2,400 mL. As shown in Figure 4-14, it is composed of the ERV and the RV. The FRC and RV values are invaluable for diagnosing obstructive and restrictive lung diseases. See Figure 4-6 for the relative volumes and capacities for a normal patient, a patient with an obstructive pattern, and a patient with a restrictive pattern. Note that the obstructive patient has a disproportionate increase in the RV, with a resulting decrease in the FVC. The TLC may be normal, as shown, or, more commonly, lung capacity may be increased. The patient with restrictive disease has a proportionate decrease in all the lung volumes and capacities. It is commonly accepted that the normal limits of TLC are about ±20% of the predicted value. This ±20% of the normal limit applies to the FRC and RV values as well. In other words, obstructive lung disease can be diagnosed by an RV, FRC, or TLC that is more than 120% of the predicted value. Common examples of obstructive diseases include asthma, bronchitis, and emphysema. Restrictive lung disease can be diagnosed by an RV, FRC, or TLC that is less than 80% of the predicted value. Examples of restrictive diseases include fibrotic lung disease, air or fluid in the pleural space, obesity, kyphoscoliosis, pectus excavatum, and neuromuscular weakness or paralysis.

The following factors are important to ensure that the measured values are accurate:

14. Functional residual capacity by the nitrogen washout method

Note: This test is not listed in the NBRC’s detailed content outlines. However, questions about interpretation of the results of lung volume tests have been included in recent versions of the Written Registry Examination.

a. Perform the procedure (Code: IIIE7c) [Difficulty: ELE: R, Ap; WRE: An]

As discussed in the helium dilution method, the nitrogen (N2) washout method is used to find the FRC so that the RV can be derived from it and TLC calculated. It is necessary to know a patient’s RV, FRC, and TLC to diagnose and determine the severity of obstructive lung disease and restrictive lung disease.

The nitrogen washout method basically involves having the patient breathe in 100% oxygen until all the resident nitrogen is removed from the lungs. It also is called the open-circuit method, because the patient inspires as much oxygen as needed to displace the nitrogen to a reservoir for measurement.

Figure 4-15 shows a schematic drawing of the components that make up the automated nitrogen washout system and circuit. These include a solenoid valve to switch the patient from breathing room air to breathing pure oxygen, an oxygen source with demand valve, a nitrogen analyzer with recorder, a pneumotachometer, and a microprocessor that directs all the necessary activities for the test. It is beyond the scope of this text to go into the complete procedure for the test; however, the following features should be known. The circuit is filled with pure oxygen. The patient is switched from room air to oxygen at the end of a normal exhalation so that the nitrogen in the FRC can be determined. Typically, the test is performed for up to 7 minutes or until the nitrogen percentage falls below a target level. This target percentage has been reported by various authors as 1% (best results) up to 3%. Extending the test longer may help to reach a target level in patients with increased airway resistance or an increased lung volume. As before, the calculation of RV is rather complex and is usually done through the computer built into the pulmonary function system. Spirometry also must be performed, because the ERV is subtracted from the FRC to find the RV. Commonly the test is repeated. The patient should be allowed to breathe room air for at least 15 minutes between tests to clear the oxygen from the lungs. Patients with severe obstructive lung disease may need more time.

image

Figure 4-15 Schematic drawing of the key components of the automated nitrogen washout system for measuring functional residual capacity.

(From Beauchamp RK: Pulmonary function testing procedures. In Barnes TA, editor: Respiratory care practice, St Louis, 1988, Mosby.)

Predicted patient values for the FRC and RV can be determined with the same equations listed in the previous discussion of the helium dilution method of determining FRC.

15. Total lung capacity

Note: This test is not listed in the NBRC’s detailed content outlines. However, questions about interpretation of the results of lung volume tests have been included in recent versions of the Written Registry Examination.

a. Perform the procedure (Code: IIIE7c) [Difficulty: ELE: R, Ap; WRE: An]

The TLC is the volume of air in the lungs after inhalation of a VC. As discussed earlier, the patient’s TLC must be determined to diagnose obstructive or restrictive lung disease.

See Figure 4-14 for an example of the relationships between lung volumes and capacities. As can be seen, the TLC can be found by adding several combinations of volumes and capacities. Most commonly, it is calculated by adding the FRC to the inspiratory capacity (IC) found through spirometry. However, be prepared to add or subtract various combinations of volumes and capacities to find the TLC.

b. Interpret the results (Code: IIIE7c) [Difficulty: ELE: R, Ap; WRE: An]

The TLC results cannot be interpreted without looking at the volumes and capacities that compose it. Figure 4-5 shows representative TLC patterns for a normal patient and a patient with an obstructive pattern and a restrictive pattern. Note that with the abnormal patterns, the FRC and its components, the ERV and RV, are out of proportion. Patients with emphysema, bronchitis, or asthma often show the obstructive pattern with its large FRC of trapped gas. Patients with fibrotic lung disease, thoracic deformities, or obesity often show the restrictive pattern, with its decreased FRC and other lung volumes.

Some practitioners use the general rule that a TLC more than 120% of predicted indicates an obstructive pattern, and a TLC less than 80% of predicted indicates a restrictive pattern. However, this may be an oversimplification. It is more reliable to calculate the RV to TLC (RV/TLC) ratio. This takes into account the interrelation of the two. Normal healthy adults have an RV/TLC ratio of 0.20 (20%) to 0.35 (35%). An increased RV/TLC ratio is commonly seen in patients with emphysema and an increased RV. However, if the patient’s TLC is increased in proportion to the RV, the ratio may be within normal limits. A decreased RV/TLC ratio is commonly seen in patients with fibrotic lung disease. The ratio will be normal, however, if the patient’s TLC is decreased in proportion to the RV. Table 4-3 shows the relationship of the lung volumes and capacities, TLC, and the RV/TLC ratio found in a number of conditions.

16. Body plethysmography

The body plethysmography unit (sometimes called the body bubble or body box) is a sealable chamber large enough for an adult to sit inside. Auxiliary equipment includes a differential pressure pneumotachometer, a monitor/storage oscilloscope, a computer, and a recording device (Figure 4-16). The plethysmograph can be used to measure (1) the FRC and, from that, the RV and TLC; (2) lung compliance; and (3) airway resistance. Each of these tests is discussed later.

a. Thoracic gas volume

Note: This test is not listed in the NBRC’s detailed content outlines. However, questions about interpretation of the results of lung volume tests have been included in recent versions of the Written Registry Examination.

1. Perform the procedure (Code: IIIE7c) [Difficulty: ELE: R, Ap; WRE: An]

The volume of gas measured in the lungs at the end of exhalation by a plethysmograph is called the thoracic gas volume (TGV or VTG). When the unit has been accurately calibrated and the test properly performed, the plethysmograph provides a more accurate FRC volume measurement than either the helium dilution or nitrogen washout methods. Once TGV is determined, the RV can be derived from it and the TLC calculated. It is necessary to know a patient’s RV, FRC, and TLC to diagnose and determine the severity of obstructive lung disease and restrictive lung disease.

It is not possible to go into a complete discussion of the procedure; however, the following steps are important. The unit must be sealed so that it is airtight during the patient’s breathing. The patient is instructed to breathe a normal tidal volume through the pneumotachometer. At the end of exhalation (FRC), a shutter is closed on the pneumotachometer so that no air leaks. The patient is instructed to continue to make tidal volume breathing efforts. The computer integrates the following two pressure changes: (1) a decrease in mouth pressure as the patient attempts to inhale, and (2) an increase in plethysmograph chamber pressure as the patient’s chest expands. The patient’s TGV is then determined at FRC. Figure 4-17, A, shows a normal TGV loop on the oscilloscope. Through spirometry, the patient’s ERV, RV, and TLC can be calculated.

b. Lung compliance

2. Perform the procedure (Code: IB9n and IIIE7b) [Difficulty: ELE: R, Ap; WRE: An]

The patient must swallow a balloon 10 cm long to the midthoracic level. A catheter connects the proximal end of the balloon to a pressure transducer outside the patient. Air is injected into the balloon, and the transducer is calibrated accurately to measure changes in intrathoracic pressure as the patient breathes. The patient is then placed into a body plethysmograph that is sealed. He or she is told to breathe through the differential pressure pneumotachometer to measure lung volumes. The patient is then instructed to inhale slowly from the resting level (FRC) to TLC. As this is done, the pneumotachometer shutter is periodically closed to measure the intrathoracic pressure decrease at the increasing volumes (Figure 4-18). As the patient slowly exhales from TLC, the shutter is again periodically closed to measure the increasing intrathoracic pressure as the patient returns to FRC volume. Lung compliance is usually calculated from the pressure and volume points of FRC and FRC plus 500 mL (for a tidal volume).

c. Airway resistance

3. Interpret the results (Code: IIIE7b) [Difficulty: ELE: R, Ap; WRE: An]

Airway resistance is the pressure difference developed per unit of flow. This pressure is required to overcome the friction of moving the tidal volume through the airways to the lungs. It can be thought of as the ratio of alveolar pressure to airflow. It is calculated by this formula:

image

Ruppel (2003) reported the normal adult’s airway resistance ranges from 0.6 to 2. 4 cm H2O/L/sec. The standard inspiratory and expiratory flow rate during the test is 0.5 L/sec (500 mL/sec). This is to standardize air turbulence during the test. The usual components of airway resistance found in an adult are as follows:

Increased airway resistance is abnormal. It is most readily noticed if the problem is in the upper airway, trachea, or major bronchi, because most resistance is normally found there. Patients with asthma, bronchitis, and emphysema have most of their resistance in the airways that are 2 mm or less in diameter. Because of this, significant disease must be present before a large enough airway resistance is noticed to alert the therapist or physician to the problem. Figure 4-17, B through D, shows normal and increased expiratory resistance curves. Madama (1998) lists the following airway resistance values and their severity:

Raw (cm H2O/L/sec) Severity
2.8 to 4.5 Mild
4.5 to 8 Moderate
Over 8 Severe

17. Diffusing capacity

a. Perform the procedure (Code: IIIE7d) [Difficulty: ELE: R, Ap; WRE: An]

The diffusing capacity (DL or DLCO) tests look at the capacity for carbon monoxide to diffuse through the lungs into the blood. Carbon monoxide is used, because its high affinity for hemoglobin virtually eliminates blood as a barrier to diffusion. The measured value can then be correlated to the ability of oxygen to diffuse through the lungs. This test is indicated when it is important to know the extent of lung disability causing hypoxemia. This is most common with patients having emphysema, but it also is important in patients with fibrotic lung disease.

At the time of this writing, the single-breath carbon monoxide diffusing capacity test (DLCO-SB) is the only version that has a widely adopted standard technique for administration. It is recorded in milliliters of carbon monoxide (CO) per minute per millimeter of mercury at 0° C, 760 mm Hg, and dry standard temperature and pressure (STPD).

The following are key steps in the procedure. A reservoir or spirometer is filled with a mix of 0.3% CO, 10% He, 21% O2, and the balance of N2 (Figure 4-20). The patient is connected to the apparatus and breathes room air while being instructed in the test. After the patient is told to exhale completely (to RV), the practitioner switches the patient to the gas mix. The patient is instructed to rapidly inhale an IVC. A shutter automatically closes so that the patient cannot exhale for 10 seconds. This allows time for some of the carbon monoxide to diffuse into the patient’s bloodstream.

After the breath hold, the shutter opens, and the patient is told to exhale to resting volume. The equipment is designed to automatically let 750 to 1,000 mL of exhaled gas pass through to the spirometer. The next 500 mL of gas is diverted into the end-tidal gas sampler. This sample is then analyzed for He% and CO%. The remainder of the patient’s exhaled volume is passed through into the spirometer. The various measured parameters are integrated into the equations in the computer to give the patient’s DLCO-SB value.

This test is done only after the patient has been measured for both RV and TLC. That is because the patient’s lung volume directly affects the diffusibility of carbon monoxide.

b. Interpret the results (Code: IIIE7d) [Difficulty: ELE: R, Ap; WRE: An]

Interpretation is limited to the results of the DLCO-SB test. Ruppel (2009) reported that the average resting normal adult DLCO-SB is 25 mL CO/min/mm Hg STPD (standard temperature, pressure, dry, conditions). Gaensler and Wright (1966) reported the following DLCO-SB prediction equations, with values in mL/CO/min/mm Hg STPD:

image

It should be noted that a number of other authors have developed their own prediction equations. In general, patients who show DLCO-SB results within ± 20% of the predicted values (80% to 120% of predicted) are considered to be within normal limits. A patient who has actual results that are significantly below the predicted values (<80% of predicted) has a problem with lung diffusion. Figure 4-21 shows a number of common conditions that can lead to poor lung diffusion. The following factors also should be taken into consideration when interpreting the measured values:

MODULE E

1. Manipulate water, digital, and aneroid manometers (pressure gauges) by order or protocol (ELE code: IIA16) [Difficulty: ELE: R, Ap, An]

3. Manipulate a pressure transducer by order or protocol (ELE code: IIA16) [Difficulty: ELE: R, Ap, An]

4. Manipulate a pneumotachometer respirometer by order or protocol (ELE code: IIA17) [Difficulty: ELE: R, Ap, An]

d. Differential-pressure (flow sensing) pneumotachometer

Some articles refer to a differential pressure pneumotachometer as a Fleisch-type device. These units have a resistive element (tubes or mesh screen) in the flow tube. The faster the flow of gas through the flow tube, the greater the pressure difference before and after the resistance. Hoses connect the flow tubes before and after the resistive element to the differential pressure transducer. The transducer converts this pressure difference into an electrical signal. A microprocessor calculates the various patient values from this information (see Figure 4-22).

Assembly requires the addition of the patient’s mouthpiece to the inspiratory port so that no air leak occurs. The expiratory port should be kept completely open so that the only obstruction to the patient’s airflow is from the resistive element. A volume calibration check is performed by forcing a known amount of air from a super syringe (certified volume standard syringe) through the pneumotachometer. Minimally, several repetitions of a known 3-L volume should reveal identical measured volumes. As long as the measured volumes are within ± 3% or 50 mL (whichever is less), the unit is acceptably accurate.

Common problems with accuracy include an air leak around the mouthpiece; cracked, disconnected, or obstructed pressure-relaying hoses; water condensation or mucus on the resistive element; or obstructed upstream or downstream port. The resistive element is usually heated to minimize any condensation.

5. Manipulate bedside screening spirometers by order or protocol (ELE code: IIA25) [Difficulty: ELE: R, Ap, An]

MODULE F

1. Analyze available information to determine the patient’s pathophysiologic state (Code: IIIH1) [Difficulty: ELE: R, Ap; WRE: Ap]

Even though a physician must legally determine the patient’s diagnosis, a therapist must be able to understand the cause, pathophysiology, diagnosis, treatment, and prognosis for patients with cardiopulmonary disorders. Interpretation of patient data that is tested by the NBRC was discussed earlier. Figure 4-24 shows an algorithm demonstrating several key pulmonary function differences between normal people and those with common pulmonary conditions. The following is a brief summary of the PFT test results that would indicate an obstructive or restrictive lung condition.

MODULE G

4. Perform quality control procedures for pulmonary function equipment (Code: IIC4) [Difficulty: ELE: R, Ap; WRE: An]

Every pulmonary function testing laboratory must have a quality control (QC)/quality improvement (QI) program. Regular maintenance of equipment and calibration must be performed and documented. The essential components of the program have been established by the American Thoracic Society–European Respiratory Society (ATS-ERS) standards. All of the major equipment manufacturers have adopted these requirements and built them into their equipment and the computer software that monitors calibration and related concerns. If an error is detected by the software or by the respiratory therapist, the problem must be recorded. After the correction has been made, the solution must be documented.

See the earlier discussion on pneumotachometer respirometers for information on calibration and commonly encountered equipment problems with these widely used devices. The following discussion concerns older types of laboratory equipment that does not use a pneumotachometer. All modern laboratories have computers and dedicated software with any PFT equipment.

Volume displacement (also called positive displacement) respirometers are mechanical devices. They are called volume displacement respirometers, because the patient’s exhaled gas fills and moves a sealed bell or accordion-like bellows. These systems are self-contained and sealed rather than open to room air, as are the other devices. They can have residual volume and lung diffusion test hardware added on. The three general categories are discussed here: water-seal spirometers, dry rolling-seal spirometers, and wedge-type spirometers.

a. Water-seal spirometers

Water-seal spirometers are the commonly found chain-compensated and Stead-Wells units made by Collins Medical (see Figure 4-25 for the cutaway appearance of the chain-compensated type). The bell falls and rises as the patient breathes in and out. A pulley system attached to the bell and the marking pens record the patient’s efforts on the rotating kymograph paper. Note that the tracing is inverted from the patient’s actual breathing effort. The Stead-Wells units have the marking pen attached directly to the bell, and the tracing directly shows the patient’s breathing efforts (Figure 4-26). The newer chain-compensated and Stead-Wells units also have microprocessors for calculating patient information.

Gas analyzers for helium, nitrogen, carbon monoxide, and other extra equipment can be added for RV and lung diffusion measurements. The carbon dioxide absorber should be left out of the breathing circuit for FVC tests because it interferes with the fast flow of gas; however, it must be put in line for any testing that will last more than 15 seconds and involves breathing repeatedly into the closed system. Supplemental oxygen must be added to the circuit for any tests that require the patient to breathe repeatedly from the closed system. The following is a checklist for setup and where to look when problem solving:

c. Wedge-type spirometers

Wedge-type spirometers are sometimes called bellows spirometers (Figure 4-28). Note that these units have plastic or rubber bellows that are fixed on one side and flexible like an accordion on other sides. The bellows move in and out as the patient breathes. The patient’s efforts can be directly recorded by pen on paper. Newer units also have microprocessors for calculating the information.

image

Figure 4-28 Outside (A) and cutaway (B) views of a wedge-type spirometer.

(From Beauchamp RK: Pulmonary function testing procedures. In Barnes TA, editor: Respiratory care practice, St Louis, 1988, Mosby.)

All the earlier information on the dry rolling-seal spirometers applies here except what is specific to those units. The same setup and problem-solving ideas apply here also.

d. Spirometry equipment

Volume-displacement respirometers should have the following quality control procedures performed on a regular basis:

Body plethysmography equipment

(See Figure 4-16 for the basic components of the system.) The plethysmograph chamber must be airtight when the door and all vents are closed. This can be confirmed by attaching a pressure manometer to a chamber port and applying a known volume or pressure into the sealed chamber. The pressures should be identical between the chamber pressure gauges and outside pressure manometer. The differential-pressure pneumotachometer must also read accurately when a known volume is pumped through it. Most manufacturers have a series of calibration check procedures listed in the equipment literature.

5. Perform quality control procedures for gas analyzers (Code: IIC4) [Difficulty: ELE: R, Ap; WRE: An]

a. Nitrogen washout equipment for measuring functional residual capacity

(See Figure 4-15 for the basic setup and breathing circuit of a nitrogen washout system.) Review the troubleshooting of volume-displacement and pneumotachometer spirometers; they are used with the nitrogen washout procedure to find the FRC. The nitrogen washout–type RV test uses an emission spectroscopy ionization chamber analyzer for nitrogen. It is more commonly called a Giesler tube ionizer. It uses a vacuum pump to draw a gas sample into the ionization chamber. The intensity of the light spectrum given off by the ionized nitrogen directly relates to its percentage in the sample. A two-point calibration check should be performed at least every 6 months to check for linearity. It involves the following steps:

Linearity (three-point calibration) can be checked by introducing 5% to 10% nitrogen into the unit to see whether the nitrogen meter measures that value. If all three points match, there is even greater confidence in the accuracy of the measurements. Do not use an analyzer that is inaccurate.

b. Helium dilution equipment for measuring functional residual capacity

(See Figure 4-13 for the basic setup of the helium dilution equipment and breathing circuit.) Again, review the troubleshooting of volume-displacement and pneumotachometer spirometers; they are used with the helium dilution procedure to find the FRC. Both the helium dilution FRC test and the lung diffusion tests require the analysis of helium in the gas mixture. A thermal conductivity analyzer typically is used. It operates under the principle of a Wheatstone bridge, in which differences in gas density lead to different cooling rates of heated thermistor beads. The different rates of cooling change electrical resistances and cause different electrical currents to flow. In a helium analyzer, the greater the helium concentration, the faster the thermistor bead cools, and the more electricity flows through the circuit. This is then read off a meter as the helium percentage.

The thermal conductivity helium analyzer should be linear over the clinically used range of helium to an accuracy of ± 0.2% He. Minimally, a two-point calibration should be performed. A room-air sample can be drawn into the analyzer and should read zero helium. A known helium concentration may then be added and analyzed (for example, heliox, which contains 80% helium and 20% oxygen). A third point can be checked if needed by analyzing another known helium percentage.

BIBLIOGRAPHY

American Association for Respiratory Care. Clinical practice guideline: spirometry—1996 update. Respir Care. 1996;41:629.

American Association for Respiratory Care. Clinical practice guideline: single-breath carbon monoxide diffusing capacity. Respir Care. 1999;44:539.

American Association for Respiratory Care. Clinical practice guideline: static lung volumes—2001 revision and update. Respir Care. 2001;46:531.

American Association for Respiratory Care. Clinical practice guideline: static lung volumes. Respir Care. 1994;39:830.

American Association for Respiratory Care. Clinical practice guideline: infant/toddler pulmonary function tests—2008 revision and update. Respir Care. 2008;53:929.

American Association for Respiratory Care. Clinical practice guideline: methacholine challenge testing. Respir Care. 2001;46:523.

American Association for Respiratory Care. Clinical practice guideline: body plethysmography—2001 revision and update. Respir Care. 2001;46:506.

American Association for Respiratory Care. Clinical practice guideline: assessing response to bronchodilator therapy at point of care. Respir Care. 1995;40:1300.

American Thoracic Society. Standardization of spirometry—1987 update. Am Rev Respir Dis. 1987;136:1285.

Ayers LN, Whipp BJ, Ziment I. A guide to the interpretation of pulmonary function tests, ed 2. New York: Roerig, 1978.

Bates DV, Macklem PT, Christie RV. Respiratory function in disease, ed 2. Philadelphia: WB Saunders, 1971.

Beauchamp RK. Pulmonary function testing procedures. In: Barnes TA, editor. Respiratory care practice. Chicago: Mosby, 1988.

Black LF, Hyatt RE. Maximal respiratory pressures: normal values and relationship to age and sex. Am Rev Respir Dis. 1969;99:696.

Branson RD, Hurst JM, Davis KJr, et al. Measurement of maximal inspiratory pressure: a comparison of three methods. Respir Care. 1989;34:789.

Buist SA, Ross BB. Predicted values for closing volumes using a modified single-breath nitrogen test. Am Rev Respir Dis. 1975;111:405.

Cairo JM. Assessment of pulmonary function. In Cairo JM, Pilbeam SP, editors: Mosby’s respiratory care equipment, ed 7, St Louis: Mosby, 2004.

Cherniack RM. Pulmonary function testing, ed 2. Philadelphia: WB Saunders, 1992.

Cherniack RM, Raber MD. Normal standards for ventilatory function using an automated wedge spirometer. Am Rev Respir Dis. 1972;106:38.

Clausen JL, editor. Pulmonary function testing guidelines and controversies. Orlando: Grune & Stratton, 1984.

Clausen JL. Clinical interpretation of pulmonary function test. Respir Care. 1989;34:638.

Crapo RO. Reference values for lung function tests. Respir Care. 1989;34:626.

Douce FH. Pulmonary function testing. In Wilkins RL, Stoller JK, Kacmarek RM, editors: Egan’s fundamentals of respiratory care, ed 9, St Louis: Mosby, 2009.

Enright PL, Hodgkin JE. Pulmonary function tests. In Burton GG, Hodgkin JE, Ward JJ, editors: Respiratory care: a guide to clinical practice, ed 4, Philadelphia: Lippincott-Raven, 1997.

Gaensler EA, Wright GW. Evaluation of respiratory impairment. Arch Environ Health. 1966;12:146.

Gardner RM. Pulmonary function laboratory standards. Respir Care. 1989;34:651.

Gardner RM, et al. Computer guidelines for pulmonary laboratories. Am Rev Respir Dis. 1986;134:628.

Goldman HI, Becklake MR. Respiratory function tests: normal values at median altitudes and the prediction of normal results. Am Rev Tuberculosis. 1959;79:457.

Gursel G, Adams AB. Pulmonary function testing. In: Hess DR, MacIntyre NR, Mishoe SC, et al, editors. Respiratory care principles and practice. Philadelphia: WB Saunders, 2002.

Hess D. Measurement of maximal inspiratory pressure: a call for standardization. Respir Care. 1989;34:857.

Holland SA. Pulmonary function testing. In: Wyka KA, Mathews PJ, Clark WF, editors. Foundations of respiratory care. Albany, NY: Delmar, 2002.

Hunt GE. Diagnostic procedures at the bedside. In: Fink JB, Hunt GE, editors. Clinical practice in respiratory care. Philadelphia: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, 1999.

Kacmarek RM, Cycyk-Chapman MC, Young-Palazzo PJ, et al. Determination of maximal inspiratory pressure: a clinical study and literature review. Respir Care. 1989;34:868.

Knudson RJ, Kaltenborn WT, Knudson DE, et al. The single-breath carbon monoxide diffusing capacity. Am Rev Respir Dis. 1987;135:805.

Knudson RJ, Lebowitz MD, Holberg CJ, et al. Changes in the normal maximal expiratory flow-volume curve with growth and aging. Am Rev Respir Dis. 1983;127:725.

Kory RC, Callahan R, Syner JC. The Veterans Administration–Army cooperative study of pulmonary function. I. Clinical spirometry in normal men. Am J Med. 1961;30:243.

MacIntyre NR. Diffusing capacity of the lung for carbon monoxide. Respir Care. 1989;34:489.

Madama VC. Pulmonary function testing and cardiopulmonary stress testing, ed 2. Albany, NY: Delmar, 1998.

Morris JF, Koski A, Johnson LC. Spirometric standards for healthy nonsmoking adults. Am Rev Respir Dis. 1971;103:57.

National Institutes of Health. Practical guide for the diagnosis and management of asthma, Pub No 97-4053. Atlanta: US Department of Health and Human Services, 1997.

Paoletti P, Viegi G, Pistelli G, et al. Reference equations for the single-breath diffusing capacity. Am Rev Respir Dis. 1985;132:806.

Ruppel G. Manual of pulmonary function testing, ed 9. St Louis: Mosby, 2009.

Single breath carbon monoxide diffusing capacity (transfer factor): recommendations for a standard technique. Am Rev Respir Dis. 1987;136:1299.

Snow MG. Determination of functional residual capacity. Respir Care. 1989;34:586.

Wanger J. Pulmonary function testing, ed 2. Baltimore: Williams & Wilkins, 1996.

Zamel N, Altose MD, Speir WAJr. Statement on spirometry. Chest. 1983;3:547.

SELF-STUDY QUESTIONS FOR THE ENTRY LEVEL EXAM See page 585 for answers

SELF-STUDY QUESTIONS FOR THE WRITTEN REGISTRY EXAM See page 608 for answers