Ptosis surgery

Published on 08/03/2015 by admin

Filed under Opthalmology

Last modified 22/04/2025

Print this page

rate 1 star rate 2 star rate 3 star rate 4 star rate 5 star
Your rating: none, Average: 2 (1 votes)

This article have been viewed 3972 times

CHAPTER 48 Ptosis surgery

Introduction

The term ‘ptosis’ is derived from the Greek word image, which means ‘to fall’. In ophthalmology and oculoplastics this term invariably and unequivocally refers to the pathologic condition in which the upper eyelid margin is inferiorly displaced. In the setting of a patient with ptosis, the abnormal eyelid position may cover a significant portion of the cornea and hence the pupillary aperture, sometimes to a degree that is enough to cause visual impairment from the obstruction created. A more suitable term to describe the condition would be that of blepharoptosis, but for the purposes of this chapter the terms ptosis and blepharoptosis will be used interchangeably.

The treatment of ptosis requires accurate patient evaluation, consistent measurement of the eyelid position and function, and careful documentation of the functional deficit. Skillful use of the various surgical techniques to implement a functional and esthetic correction is required from the performing surgeon.

A practical clinical algorithm that allows the surgeon to select a reliable procedure for the management and treatment of the ptosis patient is provided. The algorithm’s goal is to help the surgeon with the selection of the best surgical procedure based on the amount of ptosis and levator function present the time of diagnosis, to achieve successful correction of the ptosis present with good postoperative results and patient satisfaction (Fig. 48.1).

Epidemiologic consideration and terminology

There is a uniform paucity in the literature of studies reporting the incidence and frequency of ptosis. There is no racial or gender predilection for either involutional or congenital ptosis occurring equally among the different races and between males and females.

The most frequent cause of ptosis is the dehiscence of the levator aponeurosis; therefore the incidence of involutional ptosis increases steadily with age. Blepharoptosis has been observed more frequently in soft contact lens wearers, and increasing years of contact lens wear seem to be associated with a higher rate of blepharoptosis of involutional nature. The frequency of involutional upper eyelid ptosis is difficult to determine, mainly due to its reversible morbidity and absolute lack of mortality. However, it is increasingly recognized in the elderly population. This is particularly true in patients who have undergone cataract extraction with or without lens replacement; the etiologic factor implied is perhaps the stretching or disruption of the levator palpebrae superioris muscle when the eye is maintained open for cataract surgery using a lid speculum.

Congenital ptosis is the second most frequent cause of blepharoptosis, while other causes of ptosis are relatively infrequent. A patient who develops an acquired ptosis over a period of days or weeks can signal a serious medical problem and needs further neurologic and physical evaluation.

Congenital ptosis can affect one or both eyes; however, in approximately 70% of known cases, congenital ptosis has unilateral affectation. Congenital ptosis may be present at birth, or it may develop later in life. A droopy eyelid(s) that is present at birth, or that develops within the first year of life, is considered congenital in nature. In most cases of congenital ptosis, the problem is isolated and does not affect the vision if the eyelid doesn’t obstruct the visual axis. This holds particularly true in the critical period of visual development, corresponding to the first 3 months of life. The pupil obstruction caused by the droopy eyelid obscures the pediatric patient’s visual field, and permanent loss of vision may occur as a result of amblyopia. Congenital ptosis has no mortality and its morbidity arises from occlusion (deprivation) amblyopia, astigmatism induced from the compression of the droopy eyelid on the corneal tissue, and ocular torticollis. The astigmatism induced by congenital ptosis is generally anisometropic and can be uni or bilateral depending on whether one or both eyelids are affected by the condition. In instances where the degree of anisometropia is significant, anisometropic amblyopia can also develop. In the presence of amblyopia and/or functional limitation caused by congenital ptosis, surgery must be performed to correct the problem early in life, since recent evidence supports that the incidence of deprivation or anisometropic amblyopia in congenital ptosis can be reduced significantly1.

Congenital ptosis can also be seen as part of many congenital syndromes including blepharophimosis syndrome, and certain forms of congenital fibrosis of the extraocular muscles syndromes (CFEOM)2, Marcus Gunn jaw winking syndrome, and congenital Horner syndrome

Clinical features, diagnosis, and differential diagnosis

Since a droopy upper eyelid is an obviously visible phenomenon, patients often present for consultation mainly due to cosmetic concerns. In fewer instances patients may also be aware of, and present because of, a decrease in superior visual field limiting their activities of daily life and often express an inability to read because of severe ptosis in downgaze. Based on its etiology, blepharoptosis can be classified as true ptosis or pseudoptosis. Pseudoptosis refers to the appearance of ptosis without true eyelid margin ptosis or levator dysfunction, and can be the cause of or associated with severe dermatochalasis, orbito palpebral asymmetry, and/or changes in both ocular and orbit volume. True ptosis could be congenital or acquired, and unilateral or bilateral. Ptosis describes an abnormally low and downward displacement upper eyelid in the relaxed primary position in relationship to its physiologic position 1 or 2 mm below the superior corneoscleral limbus. Regardless of whether the ptosis is congenital or acquired it can be classified based on its pathophysiologic mechanism as:

The upper eyelids are elevated by the contraction of the levator palpebrae superioris; with time the connections between the aponeurosis of the muscle and the tarsal plate, usually in older patients, suffer thinning, lengthening, or sometimes disinsertion of the levator aponeurosis from the tarsal plate, causing the eyelid to droop by these involutional changes. Acquired ptosis secondary to levator tendon disinsertion or aponeurotic dehiscence develops spontaneously, after episodes of allergic reactions, or after minor trauma including surgical trauma in older adults, as observed in some cases post-cataract extraction. The degree of ptosis that may develop after levator aponeurosis dehiscence might be minimal to moderate, ranging from only 1–1.5 mm of ptosis, to severe, with in some instances complete ptosis in which the patient is unable to open the eye. Ptosis of the eyelids can have a subtle presentation and even go unnoticed by the patient. In some cases, patients complain of restricted visual fields. In the ptotic eyelid, the lid crease is generally present and is often slightly higher than that of the uninvolved side. Clinically the levator excursion in this kind of ptosis is relatively good, and the ptosis remains essentially unchanged in both upgaze and downgaze; this differentiates it from the inelastic levator muscle typical of congenital ptosis. Presenting signs also include: persistent wrinkles in the forehead due to contraction of the frontalis muscle (in an unconscious attempt to elevate the eyelid), and asymmetric elevation of the eyebrows, greater on the affected side. Additionally, the upper sulcus is frequently deeper than on the uninvolved side, completing the picture for clinical diagnosis.

Acquired muscular dystrophy, progressive external ophthalmoplegia, and myasthenia gravis all can be causes of non-congenital, usually late onset, ptosis of myogenic origin. In these cases the pathology lies at the level of the neuromuscular junction producing an ineffective muscular contraction that is insufficient to keep the eyelids open and elevated. Myogenic ptosis usually points to a systemic etiology that requires medical management like myasthenia gravis, and should be fully worked up, using surgery only as the option to rehabilitate the patient, since treatment is almost palliative. Ptosis in the myogenic group is generally progressive and has a high frequency of recurrence despite repeated surgery, including levator resections. When a frontalis sling procedure is performed on these cases, surgery is usually limited by the development of exposure keratopathy and lagophthalmos. Patients with an adequate tear secretion and orbicularis muscle closure are considered to be the best candidates. Whenever possible, surgery should be performed in these patients under local anesthesia to allow intraoperative adjustment of the lid position, taking into consideration the degree of postoperative lagophthalmos that the individual can tolerate. Consideration of a surgical result aiming for under-correction in these patients can benefit certain cases.

The pathologic mechanism of acquired neurogenic ptosis differs from that of myogenic ptosis based on the fact that in neurogenic ptosis there is direct damage to the nerve(s) supplying the tone and innervation for the muscular contraction to occur, without affecting the motor endplate. These examples include acquired CN III palsy and damage to the cervical sympathetic nerve chain causing Horner syndrome.

Mechanical ptosis can occur due to a solid tumor, cyst, enlarged lacrimal gland, or any other ocular adnexal neoplasm pushing down the eyelid. The surgeon’s experience and knowledge regarding these conditions will dictate surgery that will address the causative problem, thus correcting the ptosis whenever possible.

Although traumatic ptosis legitimately points to an acquired form of ptosis, this kind of ptosis varies according to the location of the direct injury to the levator muscle or its neurovascular supply. Mild degrees of trauma, whether or not associated with edema or hemorrhage, can lead to levator aponeurosis disinsertion that can be repaired using an aponeurotic approach surgery. Lacerations of the lid may sever the soft tissues, leading to scarring and secondary mechanical ptosis. When possible this problem is best managed by early and meticulous repair of the disrupted levator aponeurosis at the time of primary repair of the lid injury. When primary repair is not possible, often the eyelid and the orbit can be explored at a later time and the levator muscle identified and repaired, although the technical challenges associated with a delayed repair sometimes render suboptimal results even in the best of experienced hands. In certain instances traumatic ptosis involves damage to the nerve supply of the levator muscle. Since the levator and the superior rectus muscle share a common innervation, these injuries may affect the eye elevation, sometimes even limiting the globe’s upward excursion during Bell’s phenomenon. It is not uncommon for the patient to experience some degree of neural regeneration after trauma, so it is not a bad idea to wait at least 6 months to 1 year prior to any surgery to allow some degree of spontaneous regeneration to happen. After this period, when the degree of recovery has reached its maximum point, it is reasonable to attempt a levator resection; or a sling procedure can be performed, depending on the severity of ptosis and the degree of return of levator muscle excursion.

Although there are numerous classifications for ptosis; such as congenital versus acquired, neurogenic, myogenic, traumatic, and mechanical3, none of those classifications provides a complete approach to the ptosis patient, nor does any of them guide the clinician to the development of a system for adequate repair. Classifying ptosis as minimal = 0.5–1.5 mm, moderate = 2.0–3 mm, or severe >3 mm based on the amount of ptosis provides a practical framework for a logical system of repair when this system is used in conjunction with the amount of levator excursion. This last measurement is an indirect measurement of the viability of the levator palpebrae superioris and an excellent predictor of the surgical outcome. Using this matrix the appropriate choice of surgical strategy can then be applied to each of these three scenarios.

Goals of surgery

Blepharoptosis is one of the most commonly encountered oculoplastic problems, but also at the same time one of the most challenging problems from the surgical standpoint. The goal of ptosis surgery is to obtain, as much as possible, an anatomic and physiologic result by elevating the lid or lids to an adequate position and, if necessary, to clear the pupil from the obstruction created by the eyelid’s downward displacement. Additionally, special attention must be given not to disrupt the natural contour and symmetry of the eyelids.

Thorough understanding of these goals and of the limitations of ptosis surgery is important, for both the surgeon and the patient. Also patients and their families must be fully aware of these goals and limitation before surgery is performed. It is advisable that the expectations and anticipated surgical results are discussed carefully with the patient and/or the parents preoperatively and documented in writing as part of the informed consent process. This proves particularly true in congenital ptosis, since in this instance factors inherent to the anatomic defect of the defective levator palpebrae superioris muscle impose limitations on the surgical results. Surgery cannot restore the function to a compromised muscle with an already abnormal or absent function preoperatively. In congenital ptosis with a frontalis suspension procedure or a maximal levator resection the lid level can be changed, but dynamic results will not be obtained postoperatively, and surgery may result in significant lid lag and lagophthalmos that is still more obvious on downgaze. The best result that can be hoped for in congenital ptosis surgery is a normal lid level, contour, and symmetry when the eyes are in the primary position, with adequate clearance of the visual axis.

Indications for surgery

In patients with acquired blepharoptosis, surgery is often recommended when the patient’s activities of daily life are compromised by the occlusion of the visual axis caused by the droopy eyelid, a significant superior visual field is reported or perceived by the patient, or extreme fatigability of the eyelid and occlusion of the pupil occur while in downgaze, affecting mainly activities like reading amongst others. Vision may be affected in patients regardless of the amount of ptosis. During the preoperative evaluation, visual or asthenopic symptoms secondary to the ptosis might be elicited; when these are present, they usually indicate the need for surgery. Third-party payers now require documentation of symptoms, field defects, and by clinical photographs routinely.

In most instances, the primary reason prompting the parents to seek for help in correcting congenital ptosis is cosmetic. It is generally agreed that disfiguring congenital ptosis should be repaired by age 5 years or before the child begins regular school to avoid psychosocial issues during the child’s socialization phase, but setting an arbitrary age for surgery serves no purpose. Earlier intervention is performed in children with severe bilateral ptosis that interferes with the child’s ability to learn how to walk, due to the extreme head position that they adopt with the chin-up position. Another exception arguing for early intervention is made in patients with unilateral or bilateral severe congenital ptosis where the normal visual development is compromised by total occlusion of the visual axis. In some of these instances surgical intervention may be even indicated shortly after birth. Disruption or loss of compensatory mechanisms of binocular fusion such as chin-up head position is a sign of development of amblyopia, which must be treated urgently with surgical correction of the ptosis and appropriate amblyopia management, with occlusion therapy and glasses when necessary.

Preoperative assessment

In the evaluation of the ptosis patient, history taking is one of the most important elements. If the ptosis is congenital, the physician should question the patient or family about the absence or presence of jaw winking and family history of ptosis. With acquired ptosis, the timing of onset is of extreme importance (acute vs. progressive or chronic). A history of fatigability or variable ptosis with exercise or through the day should warrant a work-up for myasthenia gravis, especially if there is noticeable improvement with rest. Associated neurologic symptoms, if any, should also be investigated. History of orbital or ocular trauma, previous ocular histories of inflammatory disorders, or contact lens wear may also be germane. The ocular exam should be complete. In addition to documenting the patient’s visual acuity and ocular motility, the importance of the pupillary function exam should not be underestimated. Anisocoria suggestive of Horner syndrome should be fully evaluated. The presence or absence of Bell’s phenomenon should be documented, as well as quantitative and qualitative properties of the tear film both by Schirmer’s testing and by study of tear break-up time. Slit-lamp examination should be used to assess the integrity of the cornea and the conjunctiva and to detect any inflammatory disease or subclinical pathology.

Children with ptosis should have full-dilated exams, retinoscopy, and assessment of ocular motility and sensory function with either fixation preference, the 10Δ base-down prism test, or a formal stereopsis test to rule out amblyopia. Careful motility examination in pediatric patients may uncover a double elevator palsy associated with the ptosis or partial third cranial nerve involvement causing the ptosis.

Assessment of ptosis and documentation

Ptosis is documented by the margin to reflex distance 1 (MRD1)4, which is the distance from the central pupillary light reflex to the upper eyelid margin, measured in millimeters. It is important to document the amount of ptosis to the nearest 0.5 mm, if possible. The margin to reflex distance 2 (MRD2) is the distance from the central pupillary light reflex to the lower eyelid margin. The MRD1 plus the MRD2 should equal the palpebral fissure.

The levator excursion test is the best clinical means for assessing levator function. The levator excursion is documented in millimeters, measuring the distance from extreme upgaze to downgaze with the brow immobilized by the examiner’s thumb to eliminate any contribution of the brow to lid elevation. A millimeter ruler is used vertically in the pupillary axis to assess the full excursion. Levator excursion of 10 mm or greater is considered good function; 5–9 mm of excursion is fair function; and 4 mm or less is poor function.

Patients with minimal ptosis (2 mm or less) should have a phenylephrine test performed in the involved eye or eyes after appropriate ptosis measurements have been documented. Either 2.5% or 10% phenylephrine is instilled in the affected eye or eyes. We prefer to use 2.5% phenylephrine. Usually two drops are instilled and the patient is re-examined 5 minutes later. The MRD1 is rechecked in the affected and unaffected eyes (Fig. 48.2). A rise in the MRD1 of 1.5 mm or greater is considered a positive phenylephrine test. This indicates that Müller’s muscle is viable, and the Müller’s muscle conjunctival resection procedure can be performed, also giving the patient a reasonable prediction of the desired result.

The contralateral eye must also be rechecked in patients with unilateral ptosis. When the ptotic eye is occluded, if the MRD1 decreases appreciably in the opposite eye, this usually indicates that bilateral ptosis is present; this finding is consistent with Hering’s law5. The patient may require bilateral surgery. A negative phenylephrine test precludes the use of the Müller’s muscle conjunctival resection procedure, because the outcome of the procedure is unpredictable in this setting. Callahan and Beard3 have stated that minimal or mild ptosis is 2 mm or less, moderate ptosis is 3–4 mm, and severe ptosis is 4 mm or greater. Usually patients with minimal ptosis will have good levator excursion. The moderate ptosis patients usually have good to fair excursion, and typically patients with severe ptosis have poor levator excursion.

Anesthesia

General anesthesia is necessary for all children; anecdotal reports of using monitored anesthesia care and IV sedation for ptosis correction and the use of adjustable sutures in children is not mainstream practice. Under general anesthesia, the congenitally ptotic lid may appear less ptotic or even normal. Marking the lid prior to anesthetizing the patient is a recommended practice. This will also help to avoid confusion as to which the operative side is and diminish the possibility of inadvertently operating on the wrong eyelid.

Local anesthesia with or without IV sedation is adequate for adults and the use of straight local anesthesia is much preferred for some types of ptosis repairs requiring patient cooperation for intraoperative adjustment. Adequate anesthesia can be obtained with subcutaneous injection of 1.5–2 ml of anesthetic across the lid. Nerve block injection is not necessary, and if patient cooperation is needed for intraoperative adjustment of the eyelid height, retrobulbar and periobulbar injections should be avoided since they will affect the ocular motility. The injection of anesthetic should be superficial and never pierce the orbit septum to avoid levator akinesia, thus allowing the levator palpebrae superioris muscle to function normally intraoperatively. The maintenance of levator function is an essential part of some ptosis procedures that use an anterior approach. Plain lidocaine (2%), lidocaine with epinephrine, or a lidocaine–bupivacaine mixture are all satisfactory. In certain instances the use of hyaluronidase is a good adjunct to decrease postoperative edema, especially in those cases where the ptosis repair is combined with upper eyelid blepharoplasty; nevertheless this agent can cause diffusion of the anesthetic affecting levator function during surgery. When lidocaine and epinephrine mixtures are used, the epinephrine component might cause contraction of Müller’s muscle. The Müller’s muscle contraction will affect the surgical relationships of the levator diminishing the amount of ptosis. Surgeons need to be aware of such phenomena in order to address this confounding factor accordingly during surgery.

Operation techniques

Surgical options based on levator function

For patients with minimal ptosis (2 mm or less) there are three surgical options: (i) Müller’s muscle conjunctival resection, (ii) the Fasanella–Servat procedure, or (iii) levator aponeurotic surgery. If the phenylephrine test is positive, the Müller’s muscle conjunctival resection procedure is the most precise and predictable surgical option4. For many ptosis surgeons, this is the preferred approach for minimal ptosis because of its ease, predictability, and the ability to grade or titrate the correction according to the pre-established nomograms. The surgeon can also calculate, with time and personal experience, his or her own nomogram6. If, however, the phenylephrine test is negative, one must consider other procedures because of the unpredictability of Müller’s muscle conjunctival resection in this subset of patients. The Fasanella–Servat procedure is the next option for minimal ptosis and a negative phenylephrine test. The Fasanella–Servat procedure is nearly as predictable as Müller’s muscle conjunctival resection and equally easy to perform7. Because it is in a sense a tarsectomy with little Müller’s muscle resected, it is viable in the absence of a positive phenylephrine test.

Levator aponeurosis repair is the third option for minimal ptosis. Many surgeons prefer this technique because it allows them to set the eyelid height while the patient is on the operating table. It is particularly useful for patients who have contour abnormalities and who have ptosis that requires concomitant blepharoplasty5. There are, however, many variables that may affect the results, including the need for patient cooperation, the effects of sedation or local anesthetic infiltration, and the need to over-correct the affected side or sides. It is also difficult to grade the degree of correction under general anesthesia. Indeed, many reports have suggested that predictability and success with this procedure may vary by as much as 2 mm between the two affected eyelids8,9. In the setting of minimal ptosis, however, success ought to be judged to within 0.5 mm. Nonetheless, levator aponeurotic repair is useful for many minimal ptosis patients.

Levator aponeurosis repair is the treatment of choice for nearly all patients with moderate ptosis. These patients usually have good to fair levator excursion, and they usually have negative phenylephrine tests. Patients with severe ptosis typically have poor levator excursion and require some type of frontalis suspension. Patients with unilateral congenital ptosis and levator excursion of only 4–5 mm are often helped with Whitnall slings or maximal levator aponeurotic advancement. This treatment can be augmented by simultaneous tarsectomy as well.

Bilateral severe ptosis patients, or patients with very poor levator excursion, need some type of frontalis suspension. Congenital severe ptosis with little levator excursion is best served with autogenous fascia lata sling grafts. Non-autogenous materials are available and can be used, if necessary; however, the long-term results are poorer than with autogenous materials10. Acquired severe ptosis, as seen with third nerve palsy, progressive external ophthalmoplegia, or oculopharyngeal dystrophy, is best treated by frontalis suspension sling with a silicone rods11 (Silastic) or more recently expanded polytetrafluoroethylene (ePTFE) because of its adjustability and the possibility for subsequent removal if the cornea becomes compromised.

Müller’s muscle conjunctival resection

Müller’s muscle conjunctival resection is reserved for patients with minimal ptosis (2 mm or less) with normal levator excursion and a positive phenylephrine test. Putterman and Urist12 originally described this technique in 1975. Various modifications have since been described4,13.

Müller’s muscle is a smooth muscle that originates from the undersurface of the levator and inserts with a 0.5–1 mm tendon into the superior tarsal plate14. When denervated in Horner syndrome, this muscle relaxes causing 2–3 mm of clinical blepharoptosis. The levator aponeurosis has been shown to insert on the anterior surface of the tarsus within 7–8 mm of the upper tarsal border. Additional interdigitations with the intermuscular septum of the orbicularis oculi form the eyelid crease15. Whitnall, however, recognized Müller’s muscle as another important primary attachment or insertion of the levator. When Müller’s muscle is advanced it strengthens the posterior lamella and appears to plicate the levator aponeurosis, with healing and subsequent scarring in the posterior lamella. This plication is successful in maintaining constant elevation of the upper eyelid in the open eyelid positioning primary gaze4.

Surgical technique

A frontal nerve block is unnecessary for the procedure; 1% or 2% xylocaine is used as a regional block for the upper eyelid. Epinephrine is omitted to avoid stimulation of Müller’s muscle. Approximately 5 cc of the solution, mixed with hyaluronidase (10 cc of anesthetic is mixed with 150 units of hyaluronidase), is injected just below the superior orbital rim. Tetracaine topical anesthetic eye drops are then placed on the conjunctival surface. A 4-0 silk suture is placed through the tarsus at the eyelid margin in the pupillary axis. The eyelid is reflected over a Desmarres retractor. Marks are made at one-half the distance of the total resection amount medially, centrally, and laterally, measured with a caliper, and beginning 0.5 mm above the tarsal plate. Another mark is made centrally to measure the total extent of resection desired7 (Fig. 48.3).

Three 4-0 silk traction sutures are placed through the conjunctiva and Müller’s muscle centrally, medially, and laterally at the halfway marks. Each bite is approximately 3 mm long and deep to the underlying Müller’s muscle but should not penetrate to the levator aponeurosis or orbicularis muscle. The sutures are separated into two bundles and tied on themselves, to be used as traction sutures to elevate the required amount of conjunctiva and Müller’s muscle to be resected (Fig. 48.4)7.

The Desmarres retractor is removed and the lid margin suture is clamped superiorly to the head drape. The bundles of sutures are elevated, with one bundle held by the surgeon and the other by an assistant. The Müller’s muscle conjunctival resection clamp is placed over the elevated tissues. The clamp is placed so that the most superior central mark is adjacent to the resection clamp. The authors prefer the use of a Dresner-Uzcategui (Storz E2512) ptosis clamp, although a Putterman Muller’s Muscle Conjunctival Resection Ptosis Clamp Storz Catalog # E2508 is also an acceptable alternative (Bausch & Lomb Inc. 1 Bausch and Lomb Place. Rochester, NY 14604-2799 Ph: (585) 338-6000).

A 6-0 plain horizontal mattress suture is placed under the clamp in a running fashion, approximately 0.5–1 mm below the clamp (Fig. 48.5). The conjunctiva is closed with a running baseball stitch in the reverse direction of the original pass. The suture is tied on itself (Fig. 48.6)7. Exteriorizing the suture is not required. The clamped tissues are excised with a no. 15 blade metal on metal (Fig. 48.7). The eyelid is returned to its anatomic position, and the eyelid margin suture is removed.

Alternatively a 6-0 Prolene suture can be used; for this modification, the suture should enter from the anterior lamella full thickness and placed under the clamp in the same way described above. This suture needs to be exteriorized and, after excising Müller’s muscles and conjunctiva, conjunctival closure is not necessary. Both ends of the exteriorized Prolene suture are tied to each other once the eyelid is back to its anatomic position. The suture is removed after 5–7 days. Antibiotic ointment is placed in the eye and no patch is necessary. Excellent results can be seen, with minimal ptosis ranging between 1 and 2 mm (Fig. 48.8). The advantages of this technique are that it is quick, predictable, and quantifiable. Late failures are rare. Complications include a rare superior corneal abrasion, under-correction, or over-correction. Usually an abrasion heals spontaneously if it is small. A bandage contact lens can also be placed if desired. Over-correction is rare with this technique. If it occurs, the plain suture can be cut under topical anesthetic in the office, and the wound can be separated gently with a cotton swab. Under-correction requires another procedure at a later date (Table 48.1).

Table 48.1 Resection nomogram for Müller’s muscle conjunctival resection

Amount of ptosis in mm Amount of MMCR resection
0.5–1 mm 4 mm
2 mm 8 mm
3 mm 10 mm
>3 mm Not recommended

Courtesy of S. Dresner.

Levator aponeurosis repair

Levator aponeurosis repair is useful for minimal to moderate ptosis and can be employed when Müller’s muscle conjunctival resection or Fasanella–Servat are not indicated, as in the patient with a large conjunctival filtering bleb or when concomitant blepharoplasty it desired. For moderate ptosis (3–4 mm), it is the procedure of choice. A maximal levator aponeurotic advancement or Whitnall sling can be employed for patients with severe unilateral ptosis; excising additional amounts of tarsus to elevate the eyelid margin can further augment it.

The levator palpebrae superioris extends from the annulus of Zinn traveling anteriorly through the superior orbit to Whitnall’s ligament, which serves as a suspensory ligament for the upper eyelid (Fig. 48.9). At this point the muscle appears aponeurotic and has a whitish color. The levator aponeurosis courses downward to insert on the inferior two-thirds of the anterior surface of the tarsal plate, the fibrous septi of the orbicularis, and the subcutaneous tissues16. Anterior to the levator aponeurosis is the preaponeurotic fat pad and the orbital septum.

Surgical technique

The procedure is best performed under local anesthesia with minimal intravenous sedation; small amounts of local anesthetic are used to avoid paralyzing the levator muscle. Epinephrine is recommended for adequate hemostasis. Approximately 1–2 cc of 1% xylocaine with epinephrine is usually sufficient. The eyelid crease should be marked prior to local infiltration. If unilateral ptosis is to be performed, the incision is marked approximately 1 mm below the crease on the opposite eyelid. Postoperatively the crease will rise slightly. If bilateral surgery is planned, the incision can be symmetrically placed at the desired location, but placing the incision too high beyond the superior tarsal border of the upper tarsus should be avoided.

After the local anesthetic is injected into the eyelid, topical tetracaine eye drops are placed on the conjunctival surface. The patient is prepped, and protective corneal shields can be placed over the globes. The incision can be made with a no. 15 Bard–Parker blade, a Colorado needle tip (Colorado Biomedical, 6851 Highway 73 Evergreen, CO 80439) in cut mode, or a CO2 laser set to incisional mode. A skin muscle flap is developed to expose the orbital septum. The septum is incised over the upper one-third to avoid incising or damaging the underlying levator (Fig. 48.10)17. The pre-aponeurotic fat pad is reflected upward to reveal the whitish aponeurosis beneath. A high temperature hand-held cautery is used to disinsert the aponeurosis from the tarsal plate, which separates the aponeurosis from the underlying Müller’s muscle (Fig. 48.11). Dissection is carried upward, as high as Whitnall’s ligament if necessary. A double 5-0 Vicryl suture is placed partial thickness through the central portion of the upper tarsus in two 3 mm bites. This suture is then taken up through the aponeurosis at the desired height (Fig. 48.12). This is temporarily tied and the level is examined. Usually sitting the patient up on the table gives a more accurate assessment. A 1–1.5 mm over-correction is desirable because the protractors (orbicularis) are paralyzed by local anesthetic and there can be some stimulation of Müller’s muscle by the epinephrine. Additional sutures can be placed medially and laterally for contour adjustment; often, however, they are unnecessary. The excess levator aponeurosis is trimmed. A strip of skin-orbicularis flap superiorly can be excised if necessary, or bilateral blepharoplasties can be performed. The wound is then closed with a 6-0 suture of choice with supratarsal fixation on every other bite of the suture. Excellent results can be obtained with this approach (Fig. 48.13).

Whitnall sling procedure

The Whitnall sling procedure is a maximal levator aponeurosis advancement. In actuality, the levator muscle’s Whitnall’s ligament is sewn to the superior tarsal plate, with no cutting of the medial and lateral horns of the levator and aponeurosis. This is usually employed in unilateral congenital ptosis with levator function in the 5 mm range.

Surgical technique

Because this technique is often performed under general anesthesia, an empiric formula needs to be used to set the height of the lid margin. The gaping technique described by McCord18 suggests that in congenital ptosis, 3 mm should be added to the amount of ptosis present; this numeric value equals the amount of gaping or lagophthalmos that will be established on the operating room table. For instance, if there is 3 mm of ptosis present, the eyes should be left open or ‘gaped’ 6 mm on the operating table. Another formula that can be used is to subtract the levator excursion in the affected eyelid from the levator excursion on the normal side; this number is then multiplied by 1.2 to calculate the amount of levator aponeurotic advancement. For example, if one ptotic side has a levator excursion of 6 mm and the unaffected side has a levator excursion of 14 mm; the difference in levator function is 8 mm. This value of 8 mm is then multiplied by 1.2, for a total of 9.6 mm of levator advancement.

If additional elevation is required, a tarsectomy can be performed at the same time that the Whitnall’s sling is being performed; up to 2–4 mm of tarsus can be excised at the time of surgery19. With this method, each millimeter of tarsus is equivalent to 2 mm of aponeurosis advancement.

Complications with aponeurosis surgery include contour abnormalities, over-correction, under-correction, and conjunctival prolapse, which is rare. Complications are usually best addressed 1 week into the postsurgical period9. With over-correction, the wound can be opened and the aponeurosis sutures cut. The aponeurosis is then recessed slightly with cotton swabs and the eyelid level is reassessed. Under-corrections are opened and the aponeurosis advanced appropriately to the desired position, and contour abnormalities are handled in a similar fashion.

Frontalis suspension using fascia lata

Patients with severe ptosis and poor levator function are candidates for frontalis suspension with autogenous fascia lata. Patients with synkinetic ptosis (Marcus–Gunn jaw-winking ptosis) may also be candidates for this procedure with or without levator extirpation. Generally, autogenous fascia lata gives more predictable and long-lasting results10. Eye bank preserved tissues can be utilized when the patient is younger than 3 years of age or at the family’s request.

Autogenous fascia lata is easily harvested ‘freehand’, obviating the need for any kind of fascial strippers. An incision of approximately 3–4 cm is marked in the mid-thigh longitudinally, halfway between the head of the fibula and the anterior superior iliac spine (Fig. 48.14). Although this procedure is usually performed under general anesthesia, 0.5% marcaine with 1 : 100 000 epinephrine is injected subcutaneously for hemostasis and postoperative analgesia. The foot is pronated slightly by a non-scrubbed assistant, or it can be taped to immobilize the leg and place the fascia lata on stretch. The incision is begun with a no. 15 Bard–Parker blade, and dissection is carried down through the subcutaneous fat to the fascia. For bilateral surgery, the harvested strip of fascia needs to be at least 6 mm in width and 8 to 10 cm in length. Two incisions are made 8–10 cm apart into the fascia with a no. 15 Bard–Parker blade. The fascia is exposed superiorly and inferiorly by dissecting bluntly with small ‘peanuts’ (small gauze-wrapped cotton balls). A surgical assistant moves along the incisions with army–navy retractors to expose the field. Using long Metzenbaum scissors, the fascial strips are incised lengthwise. Each strip is transected at both ends with curved scissors or Jorgenson’s scissors, and pulled out of the wound. The fascia lata is not repaired primarily. The subcutaneous tissues are closed with 4-0 or 5-0 Vicryl sutures, and the skin can be closed with a 5-0 plain gut suture.

Surgical technique

A number of patterns for frontalis suspensions have been described. A simple pentagonal pattern is useful for both fascia lata and silicone rod and requires less graft material, which is advantageous for two reasons: less foreign material is implanted and, in the case of small children, the available length of autologous material will not be a limiting factor.

Local anesthetic with epinephrine is injected pretarsally and to the suprabrow region. Two marks are drawn adjacent to the medial and lateral corneal limbus over the midtarsus, and 3 mm long incisions are made over the previously placed marks down to the tarsal plate with a no. 15 Bard–Parker blade. A fascial strip 2–3 mm in width is then pulled through the incisions with a Wright fascia lata needle. The fascial strips can be pulled upward to the medial and lateral eyebrow to mark the two brow incisions, ensuring a proper vector and eyelid contour. The medial and lateral suprabrow incisions are incised down to the periosteum with a no. 15 Bard–Parker blade. While the globe is protected by a lid plate or a corneal protector, a Wright needle is passed downward from the medial and lateral brow incisions through the preaponeurotic fat pads to the lid incisions. The fascial strip is then pulled through the medial and lateral brow incisions and crossed centrally over the pupil to mark the central incision at a point 5–7 mm above the two incisions. The central incision is made down to the periosteum, and the two ends of the fascial strip are tunneled into the central incision with the Wright needle. This approach helps ensure the proper vectors of pull and respects the normal eyelid contour. The fascia is pulled up until the lid margin approximates the upper limbus and is then tied with one-half of a surgeon’s knot. A 6-0 Prolene suture, Mersilene or braided nylon suture is sewn through the knotted strips and tied, securing the knot. It is then sewn into the frontalis muscles superiorly. Excess fascia is trimmed, and 4–5 mm of remnant fascia are tucked under the central skin incision, into frontalis muscle. The eyelid and brow incisions are then closed with 6-0 plain gut suture.

Frontalis suspension using a silicone (silastic) rod

Silicone (Silastic) rod suspension is useful in myogenic ptosis conditions such as progressive external ophthalmoplegia, oculopharyngeal dystrophy, and myasthenia gravis, or in third nerve palsy patients. Rarely, an adult with severe bilateral congenital ptosis with no previous surgical correction or with under-correction from previous surgeries may present with absent or poor Bell’s protective eye phenomenon. These patients are usually better served with silicone rod frontalis suspension.

Silicone rod frontalis suspension is recommended in patients with progressive neuromuscular disorders and third nerve palsy because of the possibility of recovery from illness, possible favorable response to therapeutics, and allowance for postoperative adjustment. The 1 mm solid silicone (Silastic) rods are available commercially (Fig. 48.15). Some of the available silicone rod packages like the Seiff frontalis suspension set from BD Visitec™ Catalog# 585192 come with passing needles and a silicone sleeve, which eliminate the need for the Wright fascia lata needle (BD 1 Becton Drive, Franklin Lakes, NJ USA 07417 Ph: 201.847.6800). Some surgeons that find the metal trochard on the Seiff set to be not sturdy enough to withstand torque without bending, and they still prefer to use the Wright fascia needle. Using this instrument has two minor disadvantages that can be easily overcome: the Wright needle to pass the silicone needs to be done in a retrograde fashion and silicone has to be threaded into the needle. The silicone thread used by the authors (NU) when using the fascia needle is the Dyna Rod Prosthesis (Roger Klein Instruments, PO Box 501. Palmer, PR 00721 Ph: 787 8873405 Fax:787 888 8071). Other materials like ePTFE (Gore-Tex®) are available for this purpose, but the authors do not use this material routinely.

Surgical technique

The surgery can be performed under general anesthesia or local anesthesia; however, local anesthesia is preferred because it allows the surgeon to fine-tune the eyelid level and contour intraoperatively. A simple pentagonal design similar to that used for the fascial frontalis suspension works well for this procedure. A lid crease incision, however, is more appropriate in this situation because it permits attachment of the silicone rod directly to the tarsal plate.

One percent xylocaine with epinephrine and hyaluronidase is injected under the lid crease incision and just above the eyebrow centrally, medially, and laterally. The lid crease incision is made and the tarsal plate is exposed by dissection through the orbicularis. The silicone rod is sewn onto the tarsal plate with three to five interrupted 6-0 braided nylon or polypropylene sutures (Fig. 48.16). The rod is then pulled up to the eyebrow to mark the medial and lateral brow incisions. This will help to optimize the contour of the upper eyelid margin. Incisions are made down to the periosteum. With the globe protected, in a similar fashion as described above, the rods are passed through the preaponeurotic space to the medial and lateral brow incisions with the passing needles (Fig. 48.17) or the Wright fascia needle. The medial and lateral ends of the silicone rod are then pulled up and crossed centrally to mark the central incision above the pupillary optic axis, which is usually above the pupil or just slightly medial to it. The two ends of the rod are passed through a small silicone sleeve to secure them at optimum length and tension. This maneuver can be performed using either a Watzke or a Lambert silicone sleeve spreader. The lid level is set between 1 and 3 mm above the pupil, depending on the condition being treated. (When dealing with adult myogenic or neurogenic ptosis, the surgeon should not elevate the margin of the superior eyelid to the limbus, as for correction of congenital ptosis.) The rods are trimmed and left with 5–8 mm at either end for possible future adjustment. The ends of these rods are then tucked into the wound. A 6-0 braided nylon or polypropylene suture is sewn around the sleeve, cutting into the silicone sleeve, which is then sewn superiorly to the deeper frontalis muscle (Fig. 48.18). The brow incisions are closed and the lid crease incision is closed, usually with supratarsal fixation every other bite to create a defined lid crease. One can adjust the lid level and contour postoperatively in the office by exposing the silicone sleeve under the central suprabrow incision. This is best done within the first few weeks after surgery, because once a pseudocapsule forms around the rods adjustment may prove to be more difficult. If indicated, the rod can be entirely removed at any time postoperatively. The silicone rod offers the extra advantage and flexibility of adjustability, and results comparable to those obtained with fascia lata techniques can be achieved (Fig. 48.19).

Intraoperative complications

Complications during ptosis surgery are infrequent and can be minimized by the skilled surgeon to a minimum. Inadvertent damage to the levator or other structures, including globe perforations, are nevertheless still theoretically possible. Protecting the globe and cornea during dissection and suture placement using a rigid corneal protector or lid plate, especially during Wright needle insertion, is prudent when performing ptosis surgery. Corneal abrasion can result from sutures inadvertently placed full thickness through the tarsus or conjunctival surface. After suture placement the lid must be everted to check that sutures are not exposed. The most frequent intraoperative complication in ptosis surgery is hemorrhage. Minimal to moderate bleeding can be addressed with electrocautery device and in some instances with the aid of hemostatic agents such as fibrin, thrombin, and other biological sealants such as Gelfoam®, SURGICEL® and others. Meticulous hemostasis is essential to prevent hemorrhagic complications. Acute bleeding leading to a retrobulbar hematoma is a sight-threatening emergency, which requires immediate re-exploration and decompression. Excessive bleeding at the time of surgery may limit the visibility and cause failure of the surgeon to identify and resect or reapproximate the proper structures. Residual hematoma within the eyelid can lead to late complications causing excessive fibrosis, chronic edema, and persistent lid irregularities. Once the eyelid fibrosis and scarring have set in they may lead to a less mobile lid and, even in the cases where an adequate amount of levator resection was performed, the final surgical result might be that of under-correction.

Postoperative care

Immediately after surgery antibiotic ointment is applied and patching or any other dressing is not necessary. Use of an antibiotic–steroid ointment combination is discouraged if some degree of postoperative lagophthalmos is expected, since steroids might have adverse effects over the cornea should the induced lagophthalmos lead to a small area of breakdown in the corneal epithelium. Application of antibiotic ointment on the suture line during the postoperative period and in the eye to prevent the corneal from drying is generally necessary only twice or three times a day for 1–2 weeks. Ointment use is not found to be necessary beyond 2 weeks since the ocular surface seems to adjust to the new situation, on average, in this small period of time. The use of p.r.n. artificial tears is advocated if the patient’s discomfort persists for more than 2 weeks and/or if the blurriness induced from the antibiotic ointment use is bothersome to the patient or interfering with daily functioning. Although no dressing is usually required, application of ice-cold compresses are advocated to decrease postoperative swelling and bruising, as well as patient discomfort. Pain management should be done at the surgeon’s discretion and titrated to the patient’s needs. In cases of anterior approach surgery, if non-reabsorbable skin sutures are used these can be removed between postoperative days 5 and 7.

The patient’s first postoperative visit is scheduled within the first three postoperative days. The focus of this visit is to check for exposure problems and infection. If the patient presents with evidence of surface drying secondary to lagophthalmos, the lubrication regimen has to be adjusted and increased accordingly. The frequency of follow-up visits also needs to be increased. In patients where a postoperative corneal epithelial defect is observed, a pressure patch (which is removed no later than 48 hours), a bandage soft contact lens, or a Frost suture might be placed. The bandage soft contact lens, as well as the Frost suture may be left in place until healing occurs. When postoperative lagophthalmos is severe and the patient is unable to close the eye, the eyelid may be taped closed at night-time, or a bubble-shield moisture chamber may be placed for additional ocular surface protection in addition to the generous application of ointment with or without antibiotics. Follow-up care is performed over a period of several weeks to allow the postoperative swelling to resolve. Once the repair is stable, a final visit usually at 1–2 months allows evaluation of the final result. Postoperative photographs allow objective evaluation of surgical results.

Postoperative complications

Infection is extremely rare following ptosis surgery. Meticulous surgical technique, taking care to avoid introducing cilia or any other foreign material into the operative site during ptosis surgery, can minimize the risk of infection. Postoperative infection is more likely to occasionally occur with frontalis sling suspension procedures, since avascular and sometimes foreign material is introduced subcutaneously; in addition, a non-infectious inflammatory reaction to implanted materials may occur. Once a clinical or culture proven infection develops, in the setting of frontalis suspension sling with synthetic material, its removal is mandatory. Treating infections with the appropriate systemic antibiotics therapy is mandatory in the management of postoperative ptosis infection. Late granulomatous inflammatory reactions can be observed not only around synthetic frontalis sling materials, but also around any suture material used for ptosis repair.

The incidence of diplopia arising from surgical complications after ptosis surgery is extremely rare. Pre-existing strabismus with diplopia may be more evident to the patient once the pupil obstruction is cleared. Usually, de novo postoperative diplopia is due to direct damage to the superior rectus muscle and sometimes the superior oblique muscle; rarely, it is due to direct nerve damage. If postoperative diplopia develops after ptosis surgery prompt referral to a strabismus surgeon for management with exploration and repair with strabismus surgery is warranted.

Under-correction of the ptotic lid is the most common complication in the immediate and late postoperative period regardless of the type of ptosis and surgical technique used. Most often the cause of under-correction in anterior approach surgery is inadequate resection of the levator tendon during surgery. Inadvertent suture rupture leading to suture dehiscence in posterior approach surgery is the main culprit of early under-correction and even complete surgical failure. Misplaced sutures or slippage of sutures in the postoperative period may also cause this complication in anterior approach surgery. The literature reports a 70–80% success rate with aponeurotic or anterior approach surgery, but in the remaining 10–20% of cases reoperation is necessary to correct the residual ptosis. The authors find that posterior approach surgery is much more reliable than anterior approach surgery for the correction of minimal to moderate acquired ptosis with normal levator function, with success results ranging from 87 to 95% with only one procedure. These techniques also have the lowest incidence of complications such as lagophthalmos, corneal exposure, and asymmetry. Even with such predictable results. unfortunately occasional under-corrections can occur even when proper preoperative evaluation and excellent surgical technique are used. For both anterior and posterior approach ptosis surgery, significant under-correction or over-correction can be adjusted in the early postoperative period by opening the wound and replacing the necessary sutures within 48–72 hours, before significant healing and scarring have occurred.

Over-correction in a patient with acquired ptosis, particularly levator dehiscence, is easy to produce if a levator resection is performed rather than simply a repair of the dehiscence by levator plication advancement or posterior approach surgery. For anterior approach surgery, if significant over-correction occurs it can be adjusted in the early postoperative period in the first 48–72 hours by opening the wound as described previously. For posterior approach surgery, the authors prefer to observe the upper eyelid for 1 week prior to institute eyelid massage. Alternatively if a Prolene pull-out suture was used in the correction of the ptosis by a posterior approach, early suture removal, as early as 24–48 hours, can alleviate the eyelid over-correction. Eyelid massage is achieved more effectively by asking patients to ‘pinch’ their eyelid in between their fingers and place downward traction while attempting to look up, rather than by asking them patient to rub in a downward fashion over the pretarsal skin. If eyelid massage fails to correct the over-correction, alternatively, everting the eyelid over a Desmarres retractor and performing a transconjunctival levator recession can achieve surgical ‘stretching’ of the eyelid. This is required only if a significant over-correction with or without superior scleral show persists for a few months after ptosis surgery. Over-correction in moderate or severe congenital ptosis is rare; nevertheless it can occur if the lid is unintentionally sutured above Whitnall’s ligament creating an excessively shortened orbital septum, but it is difficult to produce over-correction iatrogenically by any recommended amount of levator resection.

Lid crease complications are almost exclusive to anterior approach surgery; an improperly placed skin incision can create a ‘misplaced’ lid crease. For those surgeons who advocate supratarsal fixation if the skin and orbicularis muscle are not fixated appropriately to the levator aponeurosis during the skin closure, an improperly placed crease can also occur. In the event that the resulting eyelid crease is high at the time of revision, placing the skin incision lower, respecting the scar, and closing the new incision can have good results. If the resulting eyelid crease is lower, elevating the crease might prove difficult or virtually impossible. Placing the incision above the low scar with the previously described method only makes the cosmetically unacceptable scar more evident. Pang sutures or lowering the contralateral lid crease are some options. Contour abnormalities like ‘peaking’ of the eyelid can occur with levator resection if the sutures are placed at uneven height across the tarsus or if suturing is done at different depths, i.e. directly to the tarsus in one area and to pretarsal tissues in another. Reoperation may be necessary to correct this problem and obtain a better cosmetic and functional result. Tarsectomies performed incorrectly can produce lid contour problems with a very high frequency and are therefore not advocated except when following the appropriate surgical technique as previously outlined in this chapter. Lid contour problems may result in inappropriate eyelid closure, exacerbation of a pre-existing tear deficiency, and secondary exposure keratopathy.

Lagophthalmos is expected and considered one of the end-points of successful sling ptosis correction surgery. Mild exposure keratopathy is frequently noted in the first few weeks after surgery. In children this situation seems to be of minimal clinical importance since the epithelium and tear production compensate and this adjusts the patient to the new situation. The transient superficial epithelial defects can be managed with short-term application of antibiotic ointment. In adults, corneal staining may persist and be significant. Tear function must be always be re-evaluated in adults if there is any degree of keratopathy. In general, temporary use of artificial tear replacement, lubricating ointments, and lid closure at night could offer produce adequate protection until the problem disappears. If the problem persists, placement of temporary or permanent punctal plugs can be of benefit. If the keratopathy leads to corneal thinning and ulceration, the sling procedure will have to be reversed and the use of a ptosis crutch can be considered once the corneal epithelium is completely healed. Some lagophthalmos is common after frontalis sling procedures and with maximal levator resections. With children, the parents should always be informed preoperatively that the eyes will remain open to some extent while a child is asleep and that temporary protection is necessary. Lid lag, like lagophthalmos, is also expected and this compromise is always part of the successful outcome in congenital ptosis surgery that must be equally accepted by surgeons, patients and parents.

Assessment of surgical results

Blepharoptosis correction for patients with minimal and moderate ptosis and good levator function is safe and effective by either anterior or posterior approach surgery. The authors prefer the simple posterior approach surgery techniques, Müller’s muscle conjunctival resection, and Fasanella Servat, due to their reliability, predictability, and shorter operative time with high rates of postoperative patient satisfaction by achieving the desired effect after surgery. Posterior approach surgery can also be easily combined with many facial cosmetic surgery procedures with good outcome and prognosis. Usually, good-to-excellent results are obtained when experienced surgeons perform these procedures. Following the guidelines in this chapter, the learning curve for posterior approach surgery should be fairly straightforward.

In ptosis surgery, as with any other procedures, patient education and follow-up are essential to avoid medicolegal pitfalls and to maintain high patient satisfaction. The surgeon should inform patients that perfect ‘mirror-like’ symmetry is difficult, if not impossible, to achieve, but that cosmetically acceptable symmetry is always the endpoint aimed for. If a specific etiology of blepharoptosis is identified and has related systemic manifestations, follow-up consultation with other specialists might be necessary even before performing surgery (e.g. in chronic progressive ophthalmoplegia, aparaxia of lid opening, myasthenia gravis, multiple sclerosis, or Kearns–Sayre syndrome). If the etiology of the ptosis is unclear and associated with ophthalmoplegia, consultation with a neuro-ophthalmic specialist is prudent. Correction of blepharoptosis without an adequate examination or appropriate exclusion of medically treatable etiologies can result in poor outcomes. Not only esthetic, but functional complications and omission to refer for treatment patients with systemic disease can lead to dissatisfied patients, a reduced referral base, and litigation. If a patient presents with unilateral ptosis, the other eyelid must be evaluated to ensure that contralateral ptosis is not present. The phenylephrine test described in this chapter is a helpful tool to unmask contralateral ptosis that might be occult as a result of Herring’s law. Even in those cases where contralateral ptosis is not discovered on examination, informing the patient that the uninvolved side might develop ptosis itself at some point after surgery is a fair and acceptable practice. Both the surgeon and the patient need to understand that the amount of redundant skin in the upper eyelid, dermatochalasis, may appear to be increased and be more evident after ptosis correction. The patient should be alerted of this outcome and of the possible need for a concurrent or subsequent blepharoplasty. In the age of digital photography, images for documentation to help manage patient expectations, and for careful self-evaluation, are of invaluable importance.

References

1 Lin LK, Uzcategui N, Chang EL. Effect of surgical correction of congenital ptosis on amblyopia. Ophthal Plast Reconstr Surg. 2008;24(6):434-436.

2 Yamada K, Chan WM, Andrews C, et al. Identification of KIF21A mutations as a rare cause of congenital fibrosis of the extraocular muscles type 3 (CFEOM3). Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2004;45(7):2218-2223.

3 Callahan M, Beard C. Ptosis, 4th edn. Birmingham: Aesculapius; 1990.

4 Dresner SC. Further modifications of the Müller’s muscle conjunctival resection procedure. Ophthalmic Plast Reconstr Surg. 1991;7:114-122.

5 Meyer DR, Wobig JL. Detection of contralateral eyelid retraction associated with blepharoptosis. Ophthalmology. 1992;99:366-369.

6 Mercandetti M, Putterman AM, Cohen ME, et al. Internal levator advancement by Müller’s muscle-conjunctival resection: technique and review. Arch Facial Plast Surg. 2001;3:104-110.

7 Dresner SC. Minimal ptosis management. In: Kikkawa DO, editor. Aesthetic Ophthalmic Plastic Surgery. Philadelphia: Lippincott-Raven; 1997:151-162.

8 Older JJ. Ptosis repair and blepharoplasty in the adult. Ophthalmic Surg. 1995;4:304-308.

9 Berlin AJ, Vestal KP. Levator aponeurosis surgery. Ophthalmology. 1989;96:1033-1037.

10 Crawford JS. Repair of ptosis using frontalis muscle and fascia lata: a 20 year review. Ophthalmic Surg. 1977;8:31-40.

11 Older JJ, Dunne PB. Silicone slings for the correction of ptosis associated with progressive external ophthalmoplegia. Ophthalmic Surg. 1984;15:379-381.

12 Putterman AM, Urist MJ. Muller muscle-conjunctival resection. Arch Ophthalmol. 1975;93:619-623.

13 Weinstein GW, Buerger GF. Modifications of the Müller’s muscle-conjunctival resection operation for blepharoptosis. Am J Ophthalmol. 1982;93:647.

14 Beard C. Müller’s superior tarsal muscle: anatomy, physiology and clinical significance. Ann Plast Surg. 1985;14:324-333.

15 Putterman AM. A clamp for strengthening Müller’s muscle and the treatment of ptosis: modification, theory and a clamp for Fasanella–Servat operation. Arch Ophthalmol. 1972;87:665-667.

16 McCord CD, Tannenbaum M. Oculoplastic Surgery. New York: Raven Press; 1987.

17 Linberg JV, Vasquez RJ, Chao GM. Aponeurotic ptosis repair under local anesthesia. Prediction of results from operative lid height. Ophthalmology. 1988;95:1046-1052.

18 McCord CD. An external tarso-aponeurectomy. Trans Am Acad Ophthalmol Otol. 1975;79:683.

19 Anderson RL, Dixon RS. Aponeurotic ptosis surgery. Arch Ophthalmol. 1979;79:1123-1128.