Production, standardization and quality control

Published on 02/03/2015 by admin

Filed under Basic Science

Last modified 02/03/2015

Print this page

rate 1 star rate 2 star rate 3 star rate 4 star rate 5 star
Your rating: none, Average: 0 (0 votes)

This article have been viewed 1812 times

Chapter 9 Production, standardization and quality control

Most people look at herbal medicines and the products derived from them from the perspective of the benefits they expect to receive. However, in pharmaceutical terms, aspects of production (agricultural production or wild-crafting, extraction, fractionation, formulation, quality assurance), the legal framework of their use, and clinical aspects (safety, pharmacovigilance) are of at least equal importance. Consequently, plant-derived medicines are diverse and include, for example:

Here a very short overview is given of the whole process, from the agricultural production of materials collected from the wild, to the processing and production of the pharmaceutical product or health-food supplement. A more detailed discussion is beyond the scope of this introduction, but can be found, for example, in Evans (2009).

Biological resources and conservation

At least 250,000 species of higher plants are known. Of these, a large number have important uses for humans, including foods, building materials, dyes, spices and as medicinal plants. It is impossible to say how many of these are ‘medicinal’, since a plant may be used only locally or on a worldwide level. Fewer than 300 are truly universal or widely used and researched in detail for their pharmacological and toxicological effects. Even fewer have been tested for clinical efficacy. In Europe, at least 2000 medicinal and aromatic plant species are used on a commercial basis. About two-thirds of these are native to Europe and a large proportion of these are still collected from the wild. This fact is not detrimental in itself, but it may pose risks, including, for example:

More than half of all medicinally used species are still collected from the wild, including the less frequently used species. An example of an over-exploited resource collected from the wild has been discussed in detail by Lange (2000). Pheasant’s eye (false hellebore or Adonis vernalis L.) is a native of Southern and Central Europe and is used there for cases of minor cardiac arrhythmias. The plant is threatened not only by its pharmaceutical use (as a phytomedicine as well as a homoeopathic remedy), but also by its use as an ornamental plant and a dye source. Exploitation of Adonis vernalis affects many south-eastern European countries, including Hungary, Romania and the Ukraine. Importantly, detrimental (unsustainable) harvesting techniques are still used and there is a constant risk that the exploited biomass exceeds the sustainable levels and that techniques are used which harm the population severely (Lange 2000).

Coptis teeta Wallich [Mishmi (gold thread), Ranunculaceae] is an example of a species that is under threat of extinction due to over-exploitation. It is found in the eastern Himalayan regions, particularly a small mountainous region of Arunachal Pradesh in north-eastern India. The rhizome is a prized medicinal commodity and is used for gastrointestinal complaints and malaria. However, it has been brought close to extinction by deforestation and over-exploitation. Conservation schemes have been proposed, but it is too early to be certain whether the species can be saved from extinction.

Agricultural and biotechnological production

Most important medicinal plants are now produced under controlled agricultural conditions (Franz 1999). Such production systems require certain conditions for each species with respect to:

These factors are assessed in detailed studies for each species that is cultivated. Generally, it is essential that the production is based on the principles of GMP (good manufacturing practice) and/or ISO (International Organization for Standardization) certification, in this case GAP (good agricultural practice) and the subsequent processing steps (drying, cutting, grinding, storage, packaging, transport, etc., which are covered by GMP) are essential for high-quality and reproducible batches. Medicinal plants are a delicate product and in many cases inadequate storage of transport can ruin a whole year’s work. For example, essential oil containing drugs will easily lose their active ingredients if the botanical drug is exposed to heat or humidity.

Moisture levels

All drugs are at risk of decaying if the humidity in the drug material exceeds 15%. Improperly stored botanical drugs have a musty smell and often change colour (green material turning yellow or brown). However, different levels of moisture are acceptable for each drug. For example, the moisture contents given in Table 9.1 are considered to be within the normal range and do not pose any problems for these drugs.

Table 9.1 Acceptable moisture content for storage of some botanical drugs (after Franz 1999)

Botanical drug Moisture content (%)
Chamomile flower (Matricariae flos, from Matricaria recutita L.) 8–10
Linseed (Lini semen from Linum usitatissimum L.) 5–9
Digitalis leaf (Digitalis lanatae folium, from Digitalis lanata Ehrh.) 8–12
Frangula bark (Frangulae cortex, from Rhamnus frangula L, syn. Frangula alnus Mill.) 5–8
Thyme herb (Thymi herba, from Thymus vulgaris L.) 8–11
Gentian rootstock (Gentianae radix, from Gentiana lutea L.) 8–15
Fennel fruit (Foeniculi fructus, from Foeniculum vulgare Mill. subsp. vulgare) 6–12

The Pacific yew as an example

The Pacific yew (Taxus brevifolia Nutt., Taxaceae) is a botanical drug which exemplifies all the various approaches for producing a medicinally used natural compound. In 1962 several samples of Taxus brevifolia Nutt. were collected at random for the National Cancer Institute (NCI) and the US Department of Agriculture. These samples were included in a large screening programme at the NCI. A potent cytotoxic effect was documented in one in vitro system. After a lengthy development process, clinical studies started 13 years later in 1984. It took a further 10 years before paclitaxel was approved for the treatment of anthracycline-resistant metastasizing mammary carcinomas. In the meantime the compound had been licensed for a variety of other cancers and semi-synthetic derivatives produced such as docetxel, which are also now employed (see also Chapter 8).

The strategy for obtaining the pure active ingredient thus moved from collection from the wild during (1962)/1975–1990 to the commercial silvicultural production of a biosynthetic precursor of paclitaxel in another species of Taxus (European yew, T. baccata L.) during 1990–2002, to the current (2003) commercial in vitro production using fermentation technology:

Drug preparation and extraction

A number of diverse overall approaches and specific techniques are available for processing crude plant (or rarely animal) material. For phytomedicines, the general framework is relatively well circumscribed, based on European and national legislation.

Preparation and extraction is the core process of the industrial production of phytopharmaceuticals, and require a detailed analysis of the best conditions for each plant-derived drug. An important difference is whether a plant is going to be used as a phytomedicine or an individual biologically active compound is to be isolated from the material. For the former purpose, the botanical drug must conform to Pharmacopoeial requirements or another process that assures reproducible quality; for the latter, optimization to obtain large yields of the relevant compound(s) is essential.

Very often a botanical drug is gathered during the flowering period of the plant (aerial parts, leaves, flowers), during spring (bark) and at the end of the vegetative season (root and rootstock). However, there are many exceptions; for example, cloves [Caryophylli flos, Syzygium aromaticum (L.) Merr. & L. M. Perry] are collected prior to the opening of the flowers and the flower buds are used pharmaceutically. For digitalis, the leaves are collected rather late during the vegetative process (October).

Extraction (e.g. percolation, maceration, pressing of fresh plant material for expressed juice) is again specific for each drug and depends on the phytotherapeutic product required.

There are many different types of drug preparations, including:

fresh plant material, used popularly as an infusion or decoction

dried and cut drug material, often used in industrial production

dried and powdered drug material, commonly used as an infusion or decoction. If such material is to be used pharmaceutically it must comply with standards as defined in the monograph for the specific botanical drug. If no such monograph exists the material has to comply with the general monograph for herbal drugs (Eur. Ph. 2002, 01/2002-1433)

extraction and subsequent bulk production of pure natural products (e.g. morphine, digoxin, digitoxin, camptothecin) or a mixture of closely related ones (e.g. sennosides from Senna, aescin from horse chestnut, quillaia saponins from soapbark) using validated, standard phytochemical techniques (chromatography, partitioning between solvents of differing polarity, precipitation, etc.)

unstandardized tinctures are hydroalcoholic (or alcoholic) extracts of crude drug material used as a liquid botanical drug

an extract prepared from dried drug material using defined solvent systems is processed into a variety of pharmaceutical products (e.g. tablets for crude extracts). Such extracts are often characterized by the drug:solvent ratio, which gives the relationship of the volume of solvent to the amount of drug extracted (e.g. 1:10) (see p. 154). In many high-quality products, these extracts are ‘standardized’ by mixing high- and low-yield material. By ‘spiking’ the extract with an enriched extract, a ‘modified’ extract with a defined range of active natural products is obtained (e.g. dry aloe extracts standardized to 19.0–21.0% of hydroxyanthracene derivatives calculated as barbaloin)

a particularly interesting case is that of the so-called ‘special extracts’. A special extract is prepared by first extracting the drug with a defined solvent system and then processing the extract so that a well-defined extract with specific ranges of ingredients is obtained. These extracts have a significantly reduced percentage of unwanted compounds, and an increased percentage of compounds that contribute significantly to the pharmacological activity and clinical effectiveness. In the case of ginkgo leaves (Ginkgo folium, Ginkgo biloba L.), for example, the desired natural products include the flavone glycosides (16–26%) and the terpene lactones (5–7%); whereas the polyphenols, polysaccharides, and especially the ginkgolic acids, are less desirable constituents (for details see p. 158–159 and 249)

there are several special methods of extraction; for example, the cold pressed extract of the rootstock of Echinacea species is developed into an immunostimulant product. The fresh rootstock is used for this and the sap is processed into a commercial botanical pharmaceutical. For material to be used pharmaceutically, the process must be validated.

Effect of preparation methods on content

Different methods of preparing botanical material and subsequent extraction result in extracts with differing composition and different concentrations of active (as well as undesired) ingredients. A wide range of factors both in relation to the production of the botanical starting material (the botanical drug) and its processing, extraction and formulation have an impact on the chemical composition and thus the pharmacological activity of a phytotherapeutic preparation (Fig. 9.1). Strictly speaking, for an assessment of the pharmacological effect and clinical effectiveness of a botanical drug, precise data on the composition of the extract are needed. Just as importantly, pharmacological or clinical data on two products can only be compared meaningfully if the composition of the extracts is known. This implies, for example, that a meta-analysis of clinical studies is only feasible if the botanical drug materials used are similar and the resulting extracts have a comparable composition, a consideration often omitted by authors of such studies.