Principles of radiotherapy and chemotherapy

Published on 10/03/2015 by admin

Filed under Obstetrics & Gynecology

Last modified 22/04/2025

Print this page

rate 1 star rate 2 star rate 3 star rate 4 star rate 5 star
Your rating: none, Average: 0 (0 votes)

This article have been viewed 1891 times

CHAPTER 36 Principles of radiotherapy and chemotherapy

Radiotherapy

Radiotherapy is the utilization of ionizing radiation, primarily for the treatment of malignant cancers and infrequently for some preinvasive and benign conditions. It is central to the curative treatment of women with cervical carcinoma, and is used in the adjuvant and palliative treatment of other gynaecological malignancies.

Radiation physics

Therapeutic ionizing radiation can be electromagnetic or particulate. Particulate radiation causes ionization directly and electromagnetic radiation indirectly by ejecting fast-moving electrons from atoms, resulting in potentially significant biochemical, cellular and tissue changes within biological systems. Radiation energy absorbed in tissue is measured in grays (Gy), with 1 Gy being equivalent to 1 joule per kilogram.

Electromagnetic radiation

X-rays and gamma-rays (γ-rays) are part of the electromagnetic spectrum; the former are produced artificially and the latter from naturally occurring or artificially produced radioisotopes. Megavoltage X-rays for therapeutic purposes are produced by a linear accelerator (Figure 36.1) by accelerating electrons to high kinetic energies on to a target composed of tungsten or gold. Kinetic energy given up by the electrons is converted to high-energy X-rays. γ-rays are emitted as byproducts of radioactive isotopes (e.g. iridium-192) undergoing decay to reach a stable nuclide.

X-rays and γ-rays are characterized by very short wavelengths and high frequencies, and consist of packets of energies (photons) capable of tissue ionization. Higher energy photons have greater tissue penetration. Photon energies in the range of 6–15 million electron volts (megavolts, MV) are typically used for pelvic irradiation, although higher energies may be required for obese patients to achieve adequate dose to the centre of the pelvis. Use of photon energies less than 4 MV can result in greater dose variation within the patient.

Radiobiology

Radiobiology is the study of the effects of ionizing radiation on biological systems. Ionizing radiation acts on both normal and cancer cells. The primary ionization event in living cells usually occurs within intracellular water molecules, with subsequent ionization occurring in surrounding macromolecules. Deoxyribose nucleic acid (DNA) is the critical intracellular target for radiation therapy. Following DNA damage, some cells undergo immediate apoptosis. More frequently, death occurs at subsequent mitosis and the main effect of radiation is to delay or prevent mitosis. The onset of the latter depends on the cellular turnover time, hence more rapidly dividing systems (e.g. intestinal epithelium) show the effects of radiation earlier compared with slowly dividing systems (e.g. central nervous system).

Eradication of a cancer is only possible if irreversible DNA damage in all tumour clonogens is achieved. The success or otherwise of ionizing radiation in achieving this is governed by the five ‘Rs’ of radiobiology: reoxygenation, redistribution, repair, repopulation and (intrinsic) radiosensitivity. Intracellular oxygen is important for the ionizing effects of radiation, and total hypoxia results in a dose reduction of a factor of 2–3 in most biological systems. Reoxygenation of hypoxic cells occurs as a consequence of tumour regression during fractionated radiotherapy, resulting in increased radiation efficacy. Anaemia is a poor prognostic factor in the treatment of cervical carcinoma, and is thought to relate to reduced oxygen partial pressures secondary to a low haemoglobin concentration. Patients having radiotherapy for cervical carcinoma should have their haemoglobin concentration maintained above 12 g/dl. Redistribution of cells into the cell cycle from the resting phase during a course of fractionated radiotherapy increases the number of cells undergoing mitotic division, increasing the probability of tumour cell kill. Despite radiation, some tumour clonogens may undergo successful repair of DNA damage, and subsequent repopulation of these cells results in treatment failure. Finally, intrinsic radiosensitivity is an inherent property of tumours; some tumours (e.g. lymphomas) are successfully eradicated with relatively low doses of radiotherapy, whilst others (e.g. gliomas) frequently recur despite high radiation doses. Indirect effects of radiation on tumours include loss of small blood vessels leading to tumour necrosis and subsequent activation of the reticuloendothelial system.

A major challenge for radiotherapists is to eradicate tumours without causing significant permanent damage to normal tissue. Three important factors need consideration when planning a radical course of radiation: the total dose of radiation required to achieve tumour eradication, the number of fractions required to deliver the total dose, and the length of time over which the treatment is delivered. Normal tissues have a greater capacity for repair of sublethal DNA damage compared with cancer cells, provided that the overall dose is not too large and is given over a period of time. However, significant prolongation of treatment increases the risk of treatment failure for some cancers, including squamous cell carcinoma of the cervix. Advantages of fractionated radiotherapy include:

Normal tissue tolerance is an important concept in radiotherapy. Accepted tolerance ranges of total radiation dose which result in a clinically acceptable low incidence of treatment-related morbidity have been established. A number of factors adversely influence the radiation tolerance of normal tissues, including: volume of tissue irradiated, previous surgery, exposure to previous or concomitant cytotoxic treatment, vascular insufficiency, diabetes mellitus and connective tissue disorders.

Radiation dose and scheduling

Radiotherapy fractionation

Conventional practice involves once-daily treatment giving five fractions per week using 1.8–2 Gy/fraction. Modified dose-fractionation schedules have been investigated in an attempt to improve cure rates. Hyperfractionated radiotherapy is the delivery of two or more fractions per day using smaller doses per fraction to deliver a higher total dose over the same time period compared with standard fractionated radiotherapy. An interfraction gap of a minimum of 6 h is recommended for recovery of normal cells. Advantages of this approach include delivery of a higher total dose to improve tumour eradication whilst allowing sufficient time for normal tissue repair between fractions. Accelerated radiotherapy refers to the delivery of radiotherapy over a significantly shorter period of time by delivering six or more fractions per week, with an interfraction gap of a minimum of 6 h. The total dose and dose per fraction remain the same as for standard treatment. Delivering radiotherapy over a shorter period of time reduces the negative effects of accelerated repopulation seen in some cancers. Hypofractionated radiotherapy delivers radiation treatment over a shorter period of time by using fraction sizes larger than 2 Gy/fraction. However, such an approach increases the risk of late normal tissue toxicity, as normal tissues are more sensitive to larger doses per fraction compared with tumour cells. In order to reduce this risk, the total dose of radiotherapy is reduced to deliver the same biologically effective dose. Hypofractionated radiotherapy is commonly used in palliative radiotherapy to minimize patient inconvenience and to optimize resource utilization.

External beam radiotherapy

This is irradiation of tumours at a ‘long’ distance away from the source of ionizing radiation. Pelvic external beam radiotherapy remains integral to the treatment of gynaecological malignancies as it permits irradiation of the primary tumour and regional lymph nodes. The dose that can be delivered to the tumour is limited by the tolerance of the normal tissues, also referred to as the ‘organs at risk’, which include the small bowel, rectum and bladder. Technological advances in the methods of radiation delivery are increasingly permitting the use of techniques which minimize the dose received by normal tissues whilst allowing a higher dose to be delivered to the tumour. Radiotherapy treatment planning remains a vital component of radiation treatment.

Conformal radiotherapy

The CT scan images are subsequently transferred to a computer terminal (Figure 36.2) with software allowing delineation of target volumes and organs at risk according to recommendations from the International Commission on Radiation Units and Measurements. The gross tumour volume includes the palpable and/or radiologically visible tumour; it is absent if it has been surgically resected. The clinical target volume (CTV) involves the gross tumour volume and potential areas of microscopic disease (e.g. pelvic lymph nodes and parametria in cervical cancer). The CTV is grown by a margin to allow for internal organ motion and geometric uncertainties in treatment delivery; this is called the ‘planning target volume’ (PTV). The organs at risk for pelvic radiation include the rectum, bladder, small bowel and both hip joints. The kidneys and spinal cord are the dose-limiting organs at risk when radiating the para-aortic lymph nodes. The clinician specifies the dose fractionation to be used in the radiation treatment of the patient.

Following the process described above, a radiotherapy treatment plan is produced by medical physicists using complex computer algorithms which simulate the effects of a radiation beam passing through the designated area and the radiation dose deposited at any one site. Three or more beams are typically required to produce a homogenous dose for the radiation of pelvic cancers; the use of two beams increases the volume of bowel receiving radiotherapy and risk of radiation enteropathy. However, the use of two opposing anterior–posterior beams is necessary for irradiation of carcinoma of the vulva due to irradiation of inguinal lymph nodes. Modern linear accelerators contain computer-driven multi-leaf collimators which shape the radiation beams to improve conformity to the PTV and to shield the organs at risk. These have replaced the lead blocks previously manually placed in the beam to provide shielding of the organs at risk, thus speeding up the treatment process and reducing the heavy manual work required of therapy radiographers.

The final radiotherapy plan comprises the following information: the number of beams used to optimize conformity to the PTV, beam energies, beam direction, use of wedge angles and multi-leaf collimators to improve PTV conformity, and the dose distribution and percentage dose received by the PTV. A dose–volume histogram is provided to determine the dose being received by the PTV and organs at risk. The final plan is checked and approved by the clinician prior to implementation of the radiotherapy plan (Figure 36.3). Verification checks are performed to validate the treatment plan and to detect for any unforeseen errors prior to starting radiation treatment. A standard dose prescription for carcinoma of the cervix is 45–50 Gy in 25–28 fractions using 1.8 Gy/fraction over 5–5.5 weeks.

The patient is treated in a specially designed room to prevent radiation of personnel outside the room. The patient is positioned on the treatment couch with reference to the tattoo marks (Figure 36.4). Computerized transfer of planning data from the planning computer to the linear accelerator minimizes the risk of human error in transferring data. The radiographers control the linear accelerator from outside the room using a console which is used to start and stop the radiation beam, and to set the duration of treatment and the dose to be delivered. The patient is monitored using cameras in the treatment room, and communication with the patient is possible via a microphone. These safety features are designed to optimize radiation treatment and are subject to frequent quality assurance checks.

Virtual simulation

The planning CT scan images can be reconstructed using computer software to provide a digitally reconstructed radiograph (DRR). Bony landmarks are used for radiotherapy planning with the clinician using the computer software to place the radiation beams on to the DRR. This is akin to conventional radiotherapy. The advantages of virtually simulated radiotherapy planning include: the clinician is able to visualize the pelvic soft tissues by using the CT scan images, thus ensuring the tumour is encompassed within the radiation field; radiotherapy planning is less time-consuming compared with conformal radiotherapy; the clinician can apply multi-leaf collimators at the time of planning to optimize shielding of the organs at risk; and a dose distribution can be provided by the medical physicists to ensure that the PTV is receiving the prescribed dose. The disadvantages of virtually simulated radiotherapy planning are that it is not suitable for producing complex radiotherapy plans, and a dose–volume histogram cannot be provided to determine the dose being received by the organs at risk. Virtually simulated radiotherapy (Figure 36.5) is frequently utilized for pelvic radiotherapy for the reasons outlined above.

Conventional radiotherapy

Conventional external beam radiotherapy uses bony landmarks to define the target volume for pelvic radiotherapy. A simulator film is obtained after the patient is aligned on the simulator couch using orthogonal lasers. Cross wires mounted in the light beam from the simulator define the size of the area to be treated, and anterior–posterior and lateral pelvic X-rays are obtained as permanent records. The clinician is able to identify areas where shielding can be applied to reduce dose to the organs at risk (Figure 36.6). As diagnostic X-rays have poor soft tissue resolution, the clinician must rely on information gathered from clinical examination and radiological investigations to determine the target volume. Studies have reported underdosing of the regional lymph nodes in up to 40% of patients using conventional radiotherapy. However, conventional radiotherapy planning still has a role in centres where access to CT planning software is restricted due to resource implications, in patients unable to fit into a CT scan machine due to gross obesity, and in palliative radiotherapy.

Intensity-modulated radiotherapy

Intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) is generally regarded as a significant advancement in the development of conformal radiotherapy. A major advantage of IMRT is the ability to generate PTVs which conform to targets which are concave in the plane of the incident beams, which is not possible with standard conformal radiation. This is achieved by using numerous non-coplanar beams of varying intensity to improve conformity to treatment targets whilst further reducing the dose to selected organs at risk. However, IMRT results in a larger volume of normal tissue receiving low doses of radiation; one of the concerns of IMRT is that, over a period of time, this may result in a higher incidence of secondary malignancies and other unwanted late toxicities.

IMRT may be inverse- or forward-planned. In inverse-planned IMRT, the clinician specifies the dose constraints within the patient and an inverse-planning algorithm computes the beam modulations required to produce the specified dose distribution. A number of planning cycles may be required to produce an ‘optimized’ dose distribution. Forward-planned IMRT utilizes a limited number of non-coplanar beams of different weighting to deliver a more conformal plan. An additional advantage of IMRT is that it is possible to allocate different dose targets within a single treatment volume by a process called ‘simultaneous integrated boost IMRT’.

A number of studies investigating the role of IMRT in cervical and endometrial cancer have been published in the literature. The majority are single-centre retrospective analyses involving fewer than 100 patients.

Whilst the use of IMRT may be promising, there are insufficient long-term data regarding its efficacy and safety in the treatment of gynaecological malignancies. Concerns have been raised regarding the use of IMRT because of the poor visualization of the cervix on CT scans. The use of MRI/CT fusion is currently being explored. IMRT should be regarded as an experimental treatment in gynaecological cancers, and its use should be confined to clinical trials until there are convincing data for its role in these cancers.

Brachytherapy

This entails the delivery of ionizing radiation using sealed sources placed as close to the tumour as possible. The principal advantage of brachytherapy lies in the delivery of a very high dose of radiation to the tumour whilst relatively sparing normal tissues due to a rapid fall-off of dose away from the source according to the principle of the inverse square law. Other advantages over external beam radiation include: the accurate localization of tumour and immobilization of the area being treated reduces set-up errors; and delivery of treatment over a significantly shorter period, thus eliminating the risk of accelerated tumour repopulation associated with protracted courses of radiotherapy. A major disadvantage includes the need to access the tumour, which frequently requires an operative procedure subject to the competency of the brachytherapist. In gynaecological cancers, brachytherapy is commonly used to boost the tumour following external beam radiotherapy, as in cervical cancer. It may be used as the primary treatment for early cancers where surgery is contraindicated (e.g. early cervical and vaginal cancers). Vaginal vault brachytherapy is increasingly used as the sole adjuvant treatment following surgery for endometrial cancer with a good prognosis.

Dose rates in brachytherapy

Moderate-dose-rate (MDR) and high-dose-rate (HDR) brachytherapy are commonly used in gynaecological malignancies. Whilst there is no universally accepted definition of dose rate, it is generally accepted that MDR uses dose rates of 1–12 Gy/h whereas HDR refers to dose rates greater than 12 Gy/h. Sufficient data are available to suggest that both are equally effective in achieving tumour control when used in the treatment of gynaecological malignancies. MDR brachytherapy is typically delivered over a period of 12–14 h, and thus requires inpatient treatment in an appropriately designed room. The patient is required to remain flat and immobile during this period to prevent displacement of the applicators. MDR brachytherapy has the radiobiological attraction of allowing treatment to be completed in a short period of time, thus reducing the negative effects of tumour repair and repopulation. Advantages of HDR brachytherapy include shorter treatment times, allowing outpatient-based treatment and the reduced risk of applicator displacement during treatment. However, HDR brachytherapy requires fractionation of treatment to reduce the risk of late tissue toxicity, with three to six fractions being delivered on a weekly basis. This leads to prolongation of the overall treatment time, associated with a theoretical disadvantage of allowing tumour repair and repopulation between treatment fractions. Pulsed-dose-rate (PDR) brachytherapy utilizes HDR treatment to simulate LDR brachytherapy to minimize the radiobiological disadvantages of prolonging overall treatment time. In PDR brachytherapy, pulses of HDR treatment are repeated at short intervals to simulate LDR brachytherapy.

Intracavitary brachytherapy

This technique is routinely used for the radical treatment of cervical cancer where hysterectomy has not been performed, and occasionally in patients with inoperable endometrial cancer. The procedure is carried out under general anaesthesia unless contraindicated, in which case spinal anaesthesia provides a suitable alternative. The patient is examined to assess tumour size and parametrial involvement, and a urinary catheter is inserted. Following cervical dilatation, a sound is used to assess the uterine length. The width of the vaginal vault is estimated to guide the applicator sizes required. The intrauterine tube is inserted first, followed by the vaginal applicators. A rectal retractor may also be inserted to push the anterior rectal wall further away from the applicators; alternatively, a gauze pack may be used to achieve this purpose and also to secure the applicators in place. A simulator film is taken with the applicators in place once the patient is awake, which is then transferred on to a planning computer to allow dosimetry calculations to be performed. The patient is treated in an appropriately shielded room using a remote afterloading system (Figure 36.7). The patient is monitored via a camera inside the treatment room, and a microphone can be used to communicate with the patient. Once treatment is completed, the applicator and gauze packing are removed and the patient is discharged home.

A number of applicator systems are available for intracavitary brachytherapy, all of which are based around the principle of delivering a high radiation dose to the cervix, parametrium and upper vagina. Two main types of applicator are available (Figure 36.8a,b,c).

The Manchester system was developed to calculate and describe the dose distribution for intracavitary brachytherapy. The system specified activity loadings for the intrauterine tube and each ovoid to give a dose defined to a defined reference point, called ‘Point A’. This is defined as being 2 cm lateral to the centre of the uterine canal and 2 cm superior to the mucous membrane of the lateral fornix along the line of the uterine canal. An additional point (Point B) placed 3 cm lateral to Point A is used to calculate the dose received by the pelvic side wall.

Conventionally, a total dose of 75–85 Gy is delivered to Point A. Following external beam radiotherapy with a dose of 45–50 Gy in 25–28 fractions, a dose of 25–27 Gy is delivered to Point A using MDR brachytherapy. A number of recommendations exist for the total dose and number of fractions used for HDR brachytherapy. The most commonly used dose fractionation is 21 Gy in three fractions using 7 Gy per fraction.

Image-guided adaptive brachytherapy

Simulator-based dosimetry for intracavitary brachytherapy relies on doses to points (e.g. Point A) rather than to volumes. For advanced cervical tumours, prescribing to Point A may lead to tumour underdosage as a proportion of the tumour may lie outside the high-dose envelope. Image-guided adaptive brachytherapy uses CT and/or MRI imaging to allow visualization of the tumour in relation to the applicator and the organs at risk at the time of brachytherapy to enable dose adaptation to the target whilst improving the sparing of normal tissues (Figure 36.11). The possibility of fusing FDG-PET images with planning CT software provides another potential avenue for the use of adaptive brachytherapy to improve tumour control.

Image-guided adaptive brachytherapy is a relatively new concept for the treatment of cervical cancer, and is only available in a few centres. Some of the challenges to the widespread adaptation of this technique include: the availability of CT- and MRI-compatible applicators, the availability of software to define applicator geometry for CT and MRI, coregistration of pelvic CT and MRI images, and a limited number of published clinical results. Image-based adaptive brachytherapy continues to generate significant interest, with the potential of improving tumour control and significantly reducing treatment-related morbidity.

Radiation morbidity

Treatment-related morbidity is the dose-limiting factor when utilizing radiotherapy for the curative treatment of any cancer, and has potentially important physical and psychosocial consequences for the patient. The risk of unwanted radiation effects is determined by the interaction of tumour- and patient-related factors. Unwanted radiation effects are divided into early effects, arbitrarily defined as those occurring within 90 days of starting treatment, and late effects, defined as those occurring more than 90 days after starting treatment. In pelvic radiotherapy, the small bowel, rectum and bladder are the main organs at risk. The kidneys and spinal cord are the vital organs at risk when para-aortic lymph node irradiation is required. Table 36.1 summarizes the early and potential late effects associated with pelvic radiation.

Table 36.1 Early and late unwanted radiation effects

Organ Early effect Late effect
Skin Erythema, desquamation Telangiectasia, fibrosis
Small bowel, sigmoid and rectum Radiation colitis or proctitis Radiation proctitis, diarrhoea, bowel stenosis, fistulae
Bladder Radiation cystitis Radiation cystitis, fistulae
Hip joints and pelvic bones   Osteoradionecrosis, insufficiency fractures
Ovaries   Infertility, menopause
Vagina Mucositis Vaginal stenosis, fistulae
Lymph nodes   Lymphoedema
Spinal cord   Radiation myelopathy
Kidneys   Renal failure, hydronephrosis
General   Secondary cancers

Chemotherapy

Cytotoxic chemotherapy as a primary treatment modality cures less than 5% of all malignancies. It is the definitive mode of treatment in gestational trophoblastic tumours and germ cell tumours of the ovary. Chemotherapy is often used in conjunction with other treatment modalities such as surgery and radiotherapy in the treatment of gynaecological malignancies, either in an attempt to effect cure (radical), or to palliate symptoms and prolong survival in patients with advanced or metastatic disease (palliative chemotherapy). Adjuvant chemotherapy is utilized where disease is known or suspected to be present after surgery, with the intent of prolonging disease-free and overall survival (e.g. in ovarian or endometrial carcinoma). There is increasing interest in the role for neoadjuvant chemotherapy to reduce the burden of tumour prior to definitive surgery in advanced ovarian carcinoma. The use of concurrent chemoradiation is well established in the radical treatment of cervical carcinoma. It is also used for the radical treatment of selected cases of vulval cancer. The use of chemotherapy in patients with metastatic incurable cancers poses unique challenges; whilst chemotherapy may extend survival, treatment is often associated with unwanted side-effects which can negatively impact on the patient’s quality of life. On the other hand, response to palliative chemotherapy can lead to improvement in the patient’s symptoms with subsequent improvement in quality of life. Prior to embarking on a course of palliative chemotherapy, several factors must be taken into account, including performance status, previous treatments, response rates to chemotherapy, utility of other treatments to alleviate symptoms and, ultimately, the patient’s wishes and expectations.

Pharmacology

For a given chemotherapeutic agent to be effective, several features must be present, including: the drug must reach the cancer cells, sufficiently toxic amounts of the drug or its metabolites must enter the cell and remain there for an adequate period of time, and the cancer cells must be sensitive to the drug or its metabolites and must not overcome its effects by developing resistance to treatment. Pharmacology involves the study of drug pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics.

Pharmacokinetics is the study of processes that determine the concentration of the drug and its metabolites within the body (i.e. absorption, distribution, metabolism and excretion). Pharmacodynamics is the study of the relationship between drug concentration and effect. In oncological treatment, this therapeutic index may be quite narrow in that the dose required for therapeutic effect may be close to that which could cause severe side-effects. In most studies, drug plasma concentration is taken as the conventional measure for drug concentration at the site of action. The shape of the concentration–time curve is a predictor of effect and is defined by the pharmacokinetics.

Drugs can only be taken orally if they are well absorbed from the alimentary tract. Parenteral administration — intravenous, intramuscular or intra-arterial — is the optimal route for most chemotherapy agents as oral administration can result in poor absorption and uncertain bioavailability, particularly because of first-pass metabolism through the liver. However, after a bolus injection, redistribution will account for the initial fall in plasma concentration and is controlled by both redistribution and elimination. The latter is the sum of metabolism and excretion, although some drugs are excreted unchanged and others are metabolized and excreted. Excretion of drugs is a complicated process but usually involves both the liver and kidneys.

Another factor which determines drug concentration is protein binding. A number of cytotoxic drugs (e.g. etoposide) are heavily protein bound, and small reductions in binding could lead to a significant increase in drug concentration. Changes in protein binding may be caused by other drugs competing for binding sites. Redistribution of a drug increases clearance and factors such as cachexia may reduce this, as can hepatic and renal dysfunction. It can therefore be seen that knowledge of a drug’s pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics is essential in order to predict and avoid either potential under- or overdosing.

In a clinical setting, factors such as serum albumin, liver function tests, creatinine, patient’s age and performance status, and previous exposure to chemotherapy can guide the clinician in estimating the dose of chemotherapy to be used.

Routes of administration

Classification

The most common classification of cytotoxic drugs is based on their mechanisms of action. Drugs are divided into alkylating agents, antimetabolites, vinca alkaloids, antibiotics, topoisomerase inhibitors, tubulin-binding agents and others. Table 36.2 summarizes the mechanism of action and toxicity of some of the chemotherapy agents mentioned below.

Alkylating agents

These drugs cross-link DNA strands and intracellular proteins by forming covalent bonds between highly reactive alkylating groups and nitrogen groups on the DNA helix. This either prevents division of the helix at mitosis or transcription of RNA, and results in imperfect division and cell death.

The most frequently used alkylating agents in gynaecological cancers are carboplatin and cisplatin. Previously used agents include cyclophosphamide, ifosfamide, chlorambucil, melphalan and treosulfan. Some alkylating agents may be taken orally.

Both cisplatin and carboplatin contain platinum. They act in a similar way to alkylating agents, forming DNA adducts. Both are given intravenously but, because of its potential nephrotoxicity and associated hypomagnesaemia and hypokalaemia, cisplatin requires a forced diuresis and electrolyte replacement. It is also associated with severe nausea and vomiting which require potent antiemetic therapy. Peripheral neuropathy and ototoxicity are recognized side-effects which can be disabling and are usually dose related. Cisplatin has little myelotoxicity except for anaemia.

Carboplatin is less frequently associated with nephrotoxicity or neurotoxicity, and is also less emetogenic. It may be given as a short outpatient infusion. The most common side-effect of carboplatin is bone marrow suppression, with thrombocytopenia being a particular problem, especially in the context of impaired renal function. There is increasing recognition that platinum-associated hypersensitivity reactions are seen when carboplatin is used in the second-line setting. Data suggest that more than 10% of patients treated with carboplatin will experience this reaction, which can vary from a mild rash to hypotensive shock. A variety of desensitization schedules have been devised; however, patients can be challenged with cisplatin if it is felt to be too dangerous to continue with carboplatin.

Ifosfamide is an alkylating agent which is activated by hepatic microsomal enzymes. Bone marrow suppression is the dose-limiting toxicity and it also causes marked alopecia. It is excreted in the urine in the form of active metabolites, which can cause severe chemical cystitis when given in high doses unless mesna (sodium 2-mercaptoethanesulphonate) is administered at the same time to protect the bladder mucosa. In addition, ifosfamide may cause a fatal encephalopathy and must only be given after reference to a treatment nomogram.

Antimetabolites

These compounds closely resemble metabolites essential for the synthesis of nucleic acids and proteins. They are incorporated into natural metabolic pathways and enzyme systems, and disrupt the cellular mechanism. Each antimetabolite acts at different sites in the pathway of nucleic acid synthesis. These drugs include 5-fluorouracil (5-FU), methotrexate, capecitabine and gemcitabine.

Topoisomerase inhibitors

There are two different types of topoisomerase inhibitors. Both interfere with the transformation of DNA which is required for mitosis. Topoisomerase-1 inhibitors include topotecan and irinotecan, and topoisomerase-2 inhibitors include the epipodophyllotoxins (e.g. etoposide) and the anthracyclines [e.g. doxorubicin (including liposomal doxorubicin) and epirubicin].

Anthracyclines

Doxorubicin is an antibiotic with antitumour activity that forms a stable irreversible complex by binding to DNA and topoisomerase enzymes, resulting in DNA damage that interferes with replication and transcription. It also interacts with cell membranes altering their function and generating hydroxy radicals which are highly destructive to cells. It causes marked alopecia, is myelosuppressive and should always be given as a fast-running infusion as it is very irritant and will cause a necrotic ulcer if it extravasates. Cardiomyopathy results from high cumulative doses unless the total dose is limited to 450 mg/m2. The dose should be modified in the presence of hyperbilirubinaemia.

Pegylated liposomal doxorubicin (PLDH) consists of doxorubicin encapsulated in liposomes that have been pegylated (i.e. have surface-bound methoxy-poly-ethylene-glycol). This pegylation protects the liposomes from destruction in the circulation, and enhances the drug concentration and localization in tumour cells with a consequent increase in therapeutic efficacy and reduction in toxicity. Patients may exhibit infusion reactions which can be prevented with antihistamine and steroid premedication, and can develop PPE, stomatitis and haematological toxicity. PPE usually results in a painful macular rash affecting the hands, feet and skin folds (e.g. groin and axillae). These cutaneous side-effects are often self-limiting but occasionally result in significant toxicity, including crusting, ulceration and necrosis, which may require dose modification or even cessation of treatment. Patients receiving PLDH may need monitoring for cardiac toxicity.

Chemotherapy-related toxicity

Tissues affected by toxic effects include the bone marrow, injection site, skin, hair, mucosa, gastrointestinal tract, reproductive system, heart, lungs, liver, renal system and nervous system. Knowledge of these toxic effects is essential for the safe management of chemotherapy. The most common toxicities for each of the commonly used drugs are shown in Table 36.2. Patients with poor performance, multiple comorbidities and heavily pretreated patients are less likely to tolerate chemotherapy.

Conclusion

Chemotherapy plays an important part in the management of ovarian cancer, and its use can largely explain the improved prognosis for this disease which has been seen over the last decade in the West. The rare trophoblastic and germ cell tumours are now cured by these drugs in the vast majority of patients. In the treatment of solid tumours, it may be used in combinations with surgery and radiotherapy, and in cervical cancer, there is evidence that concurrent chemoradiation improves outcome compared with radiotherapy alone.

The dramatic increase in the number of potential drugs available as well as those in the developmental pipeline means that toxicity has been improved, and quality of life is an important goal. Indeed, no new agent is likely to be developed without an assessment of quality of life.

The most important contribution from chemotherapy is likely to be improved quality and duration of survival. This has already been achieved in ovarian cancer and there are reasons for optimism over the forthcoming years.

KEY POINTS