Principles of Antiviral Therapy

Published on 25/03/2015 by admin

Filed under Pediatrics

Last modified 22/04/2025

Print this page

rate 1 star rate 2 star rate 3 star rate 4 star rate 5 star
Your rating: none, Average: 0 (0 votes)

This article have been viewed 3151 times

Chapter 237 Principles of Antiviral Therapy

Antiviral chemotherapy typically involves a delicate interplay between host cellular functions and viral targets of action. Many antiviral agents exert significant host cellular toxicity, a limitation that has hindered antiviral drug development. In spite of this limitation, a number of agents are licensed for use against viruses, particularly herpesviruses, respiratory viruses, and hepatitis viruses. In addition to licensed antivirals and recommended regimens (imagesee Table 237-1 on the Nelson Textbook of Pediatrics website at www.expertconsult.com), several studies are actively enrolling children for evaluation of novel antiviral therapeutic approaches. These studies are funded by the National Institutes of Health and administered through the Collaborative Antiviral Study Group (CASG), and up-to-date information is available about active clinical protocols at the CASG web page (http://medicine.uab.edu/Peds/CASG/).

Table 237-1 CURRENTLY LICENSED ANTIVIRAL DRUGS*

ANTIVIRAL TRADE NAME MECHANISM OF ACTION
Acyclovir Zovirax Inhibits viral DNA polymerase
Adefovir Hepsera Nucleotide reverse transcriptase inhibitor
Amantadine Symmetrel Blocks M2 protein ion channel
Cidofovir Vistide Inhibits viral DNA polymerase
Famciclovir Famvir Inhibits viral DNA polymerase
Fomivirsen Vitravene Phosphorothioate oligonucleotide inhibits viral replication via antisense mechanism
Foscarnet Foscavir Inhibits viral DNA polymerase and reverse transcriptase at pyrophosphate-binding site
Ganciclovir Cytovene Inhibits viral DNA polymerase
Idoxuridine Herplex Inhibits viral DNA polymerase
Interferon-α Intro-A (interferon-α 2b)
Roferon-A (interferon-α 2a)
Infergen (interferon alfacon-1)
Produces multiple effector proteins that exert antiviral effects; also directly interacts with immune system components
Interferon-α 2b plus ribavirin Rebetron Not established
Lamivudine Epivir Inhibits viral DNA polymerase and reverse transcriptase
Oseltamivir Tamiflu Neuraminidase inhibitor; interference with de-aggregation and release of viral progeny
Pegylated interferon PEG-Intron (α 2b), Pegasys (α 2a) Same as interferon
Penciclovir Denavir Inhibits viral DNA polymerase
Ribavirin Virazole, Rebetol, Copegus Interference with viral messenger RNA
Rimantadine Flumadine Blocks M2 protein ion channel
Trifluridine Viroptic Inhibits viral DNA polymerase
Valacyclovir Valtrex Same as acyclovir
Valganciclovir Valcyte Same as ganciclovir
Vidarabine Ara-A Inhibits viral DNA polymerase (and to lesser extent, cellular DNA polymerase)
Zanamivir Relenza Neuraminidase inhibitor; interference with de-aggregation and release of viral progeny
FDA-APPROVED COMBINATION THERAPIES
Interferon-α 2b + ribavirin Rebetron (Intron-A plus Rebetol)  
Interferon-α 2a + ribavirin Roferon-A + ribavirin  
Pegylated interferon-α 2b + ribavirin PEG-Intron + Rebetol  
Pegylated interferon-α 2a + ribavirin Pegasys + Copegus  

* See Chapter 268 for antiretroviral drugs.

In making the decision to commence antiviral drugs, it is important for the clinician to obtain appropriate diagnostic specimens, which can help clarify the antiviral of choice. The choice of a specific antiviral is based on the recommended agent of choice for a particular clinical condition, pharmacokinetics, toxicities, cost, and the potential for development of resistance (Table 237-2). Intercurrent conditions in the patient, such as renal insufficiency, should also be considered. Clinicians must monitor antiviral therapy closely for adverse events or toxicities, both anticipated and unanticipated.

In vitro sensitivity testing of virus isolates to antiviral compounds usually involves a complex tissue culture system. The potency of an antiviral is determined by the 50% inhibitory dose (ID50), which is the antiviral concentration required to inhibit the growth, in cell culture, of a standardized viral inoculum by 50%. Because of the complexity of these assays, the results vary widely, and the actual relationship between antiviral sensitivity testing and antiviral therapy outcomes is sometimes unclear. Moreover, these assays are not widely available, limiting their utility and value in clinical practice.

Knowledge of the precise status of a patient’s immune system, particularly the cell-mediated arm of the immune response, is important in the decision making for using an antiviral agent. Treatment of cytomegalovirus (CMV) infection in an immunocompetent patient is seldom necessary, whereas antiviral therapy may be lifesaving when administered to an immunocompromised patient. Antivirals can be employed with a variety of clinical goals in mind. Antivirals can be used as treatment of active disease, as prophylaxis to prevent viral infection or disease, and as preemptive treatment of viral infection to prevent viral disease (CMV infection in bone marrow transplant recipients).

A fundamental concept to understanding most antivirals is that viruses must use host cell components to replicate. Thus, mechanisms of action for antiviral compounds must be selective to virus-specific functions whenever possible, and antiviral agents may have significant toxicities to the host if these compounds impact cellular physiology. Many of the approved antiviral drugs active against the herpesviruses are analogs of deoxynucleosides and subsequently inhibit viral DNA polymerase. Some of the more commonly targeted sites of action for antiviral agents include viral entry, absorption, penetration, and uncoating (amantadine, rimantadine); transcription or replication of the viral genome (acyclovir, valacyclovir, cidofovir, famciclovir, penciclovir, foscarnet, ganciclovir, valganciclovir, ribavirin, trifluridine); viral protein synthesis (interferons); and viral assembly, release, or de-aggregation (oseltamivir, zanamivir, interferons).

An understudied and underappreciated issue in antiviral therapy is emergence of resistance, particularly in the setting of high viral load, high intrinsic viral mutation rate, and prolonged or repeated courses of antiviral therapy. Resistant viruses are more likely to develop or be selected for immunocompromised patients, because these patients are more likely to have multiple or long-term exposures to an antiviral agent in the face of impaired immunity.

Antivirals Used for Herpesviruses

The herpesviruses are important pediatric pathogens, particularly in newborns and immunocompromised children. Most of the licensed antivirals are nucleoside analogs that inhibit viral DNA polymerase, inducing premature chain termination during viral DNA synthesis in infected cells.

Acyclovir

Acyclovir is a safe and effective therapy for herpes simplex virus (HSV) infections. The favorable safety profile of acyclovir derives from its requirement for activation to its active form via phosphorylation by a viral enzyme, thymidine kinase (TK). Acyclovir is most active against HSV and also is active against varicella-zoster virus (VZV); therapy is indicated for these infections under a variety of circumstances. Activity against CMV is less pronounced, and activity against Epstein-Barr virus (EBV) is modest, both in vitro and clinically. Acyclovir should not be used to treat CMV or EBV infections.

The greatest clinical roles for acyclovir are for the treatment of primary and recurrent genital HSV infections, the management of HSV encephalitis, and all manifestations of neonatal HSV infection. The routine empirical use of acyclovir in infants admitted with fever of unknown origin in the first 4-8 wk of life is controversial. Clearly, acyclovir should be routinely empirically used in infants born to women with risk factors for primary genital herpes or infants presenting with any combination of vesicular lesions, seizures, meningoencephalitis, hepatitis, pneumonia, or disseminated intravascular coagulation (DIC). Some experts advocate initiation of acyclovir in all febrile infants pending the collection and analysis of viral culture and polymerase chain reaction (PCR) studies. Others have argued that a selective approach based on the history and physical exam is more appropriate when making decisions about the use of acyclovir in febrile infants. Given the safety of the drug, prudence would dictate the use of the acyclovir in such patients if HSV infection cannot be excluded.

Acyclovir is indicated for the treatment of primary HSV gingivostomatitis and for primary genital HSV infection. Long-term suppressive therapy, both for genital HSV and recurrent oropharyngeal infections (herpes labialis), is also effective. Long-term suppressive therapy (i.e., for the first 6 mo of life) to prevent recurrent episodes of neonatal HSV infection may be useful in preventing recurrences, although this use is investigational. Acyclovir is also recommended for less commonly encountered HSV infections, including herpetic whitlow, eczema herpeticum, and herpes gladiatorum. Life-threatening HSV disease, including disseminated infection, can occur in immunocompromised or pregnant patients, representing another clinical scenario where acyclovir is warranted.

Acyclovir modifies the course of primary VZV infection, although the effect is modest. Acyclovir or another nucleoside analog should always be used in localized or disseminated VZV infections, such as pneumonia, particularly in immunocompromised patients. Primary VZV infection in pregnancy is another setting where acyclovir is indicated; this is a high-risk scenario, particularly if pneumonia is present.

Acyclovir is available in topical, parenteral, and oral formulations, including an oral suspension formulation for pediatric use. Topical therapy has little role in pediatric practice and should be avoided in favor of alternative modes of delivery, particularly in infants with vesicular lesions compatible with herpetic infection; indeed, neonatal infection represents a setting in which topical therapy should never be used. The bioavailability of oral formulations is poor, with only 15-30% of the oral formulation being absorbed. There is widespread tissue distribution following systemic administration, and high concentrations of drug are achieved in the kidneys, lungs, liver, myocardium, and skin vesicles. Cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) concentrations are about 50% of plasma concentrations. Acyclovir crosses the placenta, and breast-milk concentrations are about 3 times plasma concentrations, although there are no data on efficacy of in utero therapy or impact of acyclovir therapy on nursing infants. Acyclovir therapy in a nursing mother is not a contraindication to breast-feeding. The main route of elimination is renal, and dosage adjustments are necessary for renal insufficiency. Hemodialysis also eliminates acyclovir.

Acyclovir has an exceptional safety profile. Toxicity is observed typically only in exceptional circumstances: for example, if administered by rapid infusion to a dehydrated patient or a patient with underlying renal insufficiency, acyclovir can crystallize in renal tubules and produce a reversible obstructive uropathy. High doses of acyclovir have been associated with neurotoxicity, and prolonged use can cause neutropenia. The favorable safety profile of acyclovir is underscored by recent studies of its safe use during pregnancy, and suppressive therapy in pregnant women with histories of recurrent genital HSV infection, typically with valacyclovir (see later), has become standard care among many obstetricians. One uncommon but important complication of long-term use of acyclovir is the selection for acyclovir-resistant HSV strains, which usually occurs from mutations in the HSV TK gene. Resistance is rarely observed in pediatric practice but should be considered in any patient who has been on long-term antiviral therapy and who has an HSV or VZV infection that fails to clinically respond to acyclovir therapy.

Ganciclovir

Ganciclovir is a nucleoside analog with structural similarity to acyclovir. Like acyclovir, ganciclovir must be phosphorylated for antiviral activity, which is targeted against the viral polymerase. The gene responsible for ganciclovir phosphorylation is not TK but rather the the UL97 phosphotransferase gene. Antiviral resistance in CMV can be observed with prolonged use of nucleoside antivirals, and resistance should be considered in patients on long-term therapy who appear to fail to respond clinically. Ganciclovir is broadly active against many herpesviruses, including HSV and VZV, but its greatest value is derived from its activity against CMV. Ganciclovir was the 1st antiviral agent licensed specifically to treat and prevent CMV infection. It is indicated for prophylaxis against and therapy of CMV infections in high-risk patients, including HIV-infected patients and solid organ or hematopoietic stem cell transplant recipients. Of particular importance is the use of ganciclovir in the management of CMV retinitis, a sight-threatening complication of HIV infection. Ganciclovir may be of benefit for newborns with symptomatic congenital CMV infection and may be of particular value in ameliorating the sensorineural hearing loss that is a common complication of congenital CMV infection.

Ganciclovir is supplied as parenteral and oral formulations. Ganciclovir ocular implants are also available for the management of CMV retinitis. The bioavailability of oral ganciclovir is poor, <10%. An oral prodrug, valganciclovir, is well absorbed from the gastrointestinal tract and quickly converted to ganciclovir by intestinal or hepatic metabolism. Bioavailability of ganciclovir (from valganciclovir) is about 60% from tablet and solution formulations. Significant concentrations are found in aqueous humor, subretinal fluid, CSF, and brain tissue (enough to inhibit susceptible strains of CMV). Subretinal concentrations are comparable to plasma concentrations, but intravitreal concentrations are lower. Drug concentrations in the central nervous system (CNS) range from 24-70% of plasma concentrations. The main route of elimination is renal, and dosage adjustments are necessary for renal insufficiency. Dose reduction is proportional to the creatinine clearance. Hemodialysis efficiently eliminates ganciclovir, so administration of additional doses after dialysis is necessary.

Ganciclovir has several important toxicities. Reversible myelosuppression is the most important toxicity associated with ganciclovir therapy and commonly requires either discontinuation of therapy or the intercurrent administration of granulocyte colony-stimulating factor. There are also the theoretical risks for carcinogenicity and gonadal toxicity; although these effects have been observed in some animal models, they have never been observed in patients. The decision to administer ganciclovir to a pediatric patient is complex and generally should be made in consultation with an infectious diseases specialist.

Antivirals Used for Respiratory Viral Infections

Antiviral therapies are available for many respiratory pathogens, including respiratory syncytial virus (RSV), influenza A, and influenza B. Antiviral therapy for respiratory viral infections is of particular value for infants, children with chronic lung disease, and immunocompromised children.

Ribavirin

Ribavirin is a guanosine analog that has broad-spectrum activity against a variety of viruses, particularly RNA viruses. Its precise mechanism of action is incompletely understood but is probably related to interference with viral messenger RNA processing and translation. Ribavirin is available in oral, parenteral, and aerosolized formulations. Although intravenous ribavirin is highly effective in the management of Lassa fever and other hemorrhagic fevers, this formulation is not licensed for use in the USA. The only licensed formulations in the USA are an aqueous formulation for aerosol administration (indicated for RSV infection) and an oral formulation that is combined with interferon-α for the treatment of hepatitis C. Administration of ribavirin by aerosol should be considered for serious RSV lower respiratory tract disease in immunocompromised children, young infants with serious RSV-associated illness, and high-risk infants and children (children with chronic lung disease or cyanotic congenital heart disease). In vitro testing and uncontrolled clinical studies also suggest efficacy of aerosolized ribavirin for parainfluenza, influenza, and measles infections.

Ribavirin is generally nontoxic, particularly when administrated by aerosol. Ribavirin and its metabolites concentrate in red blood cells and can persist for several weeks and, in rare instances, may be associated with anemia. Conjunctivitis and bronchospasm have been reported following exposure to aerosolized drug. Care must be taken when using aerosolized ribavirin in children undergoing mechanical ventilation to avoid precipitation of particles in ventilator tubing; the drug is not formally approved for use in the mechanically ventilated patient. Concerns regarding potential teratogenicity from animal studies have not been borne out in clinical practice, although care should be taken to prevent inadvertent exposure to aerosolized drug in pregnant health care providers.

Oseltamivir and Zanamivir

Oseltamivir and zanamivir are active against both influenza A and B, although the importance of this broader spectrum of anti-influenza activity in disease control is modest because influenza B infection is typically a much milder illness. Emerging strains of influenza, including H5N1 and the 2009-10 pandemic strain, H1N1 (swine flu), are susceptible to oseltamivir and zanamivir but resistant to amantidine. Therefore, these agents are emerging as the antivirals of choice for influenza infection. Neither agent has appreciable activity against other respiratory viruses. The mechanism of antiviral activity of these agents is via inhibition of the influenza neuraminidase.

Zanamivir has poor oral bioavailability and is licensed only for inhalational administration. With inhaled administration, >75% of the dose is deposited in the oropharynx and much of it is swallowed. The actual amount distributed to the airways and lungs depends on factors such as the patient’s inspiratory flow. About 13% of the dose appears to be distributed to the airways and lungs, with about 10% of the inhaled dose distributed systemically. Local respiratory mucosal drug concentrations greatly exceed the drug concentration needed to inhibit influenza A and B virus. Elimination is via the kidneys, and no dosage adjustment is necessary with renal insufficiency, because the amount that is systemically absorbed is low.

Oseltamivir is administered as an esterified prodrug that has high oral bioavailability. It is eliminated by tubular secretion, and dosage adjustment is required for patients with renal insufficiency. Gastrointestinal adverse effects, including nausea and vomiting, are occasionally observed. The drug is indicated for both treatment and prophylaxis. The usual adult dosage for treatment of influenza is 75 mg twice daily for 5 days. Treatment should be initiated within 2 days of the appearance of symptoms. Recommended treatment dosages for children vary by weight: 30 mg twice a day for children ≤15 kg, 45 mg twice a day for children weighing 15-23 kg, 60 mg twice a day for those weighing 23-40 kg, and 75 mg twice a day for children ≥40 kg. Dosages for chemoprophylaxis are the same for each weight group, but drug should be administered only once daily rather than twice daily. Although the drug is not approved for children <1 year of age, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention have issued a recommendation that oseltamivir be used in children in this age group for prophylaxis and treatment of H1N1 (swine) influenza. Dosage recommendations are available for this age group at www.cdc.gov/h1n1flu/recommendations.htm. Oseltamivir has been described to produce neuropsychiatric and psychological side effects in some patients; drug should be discontinued if behavioural or psychiatric side effects are observed.

Antivirals Used for Hepatitis Viruses and Papillomaviruses

Antiviral therapy for viral hepatitis and for human papillomavirus (HPV) infections is relatively new, because effective agents became available only recently. These are chronic infections that tend to not produce symptoms or disability for many years. The decision to treat viral hepatitis or HPV infections with an antiviral agent should only be undertaken after consultation with an expert in the management of these infections.

Lamivudine

Lamivudine is a reverse transcriptase (RT) inhibitor that is used for management of HIV infection (Chapter 268). Because an RT step is required for replication of hepatitis B virus, it was not surprising that lamivudine was found to have activity against this virus. Lamivudine is useful in the management of hepatitis B infection in children and is available as an oral suspension for pediatric dosing. It is rapidly absorbed following oral administration, with a bioavailability of 80-87%. Lamivudine crosses the placenta and is distributed in breast milk and excreted via the kidneys. A majority of drug is unchanged following oral administration, so dosage adjustment is necessary in the setting of renal insufficiency.

Antiviral Immune Globulins

Immune globulins are useful adjuncts in the management of viral disease. However, they are most useful when administered as prophylaxis against infection and disease in high-risk patients; their value as therapeutic agents in the setting of established infection is less clear. Varicella-zoster immune globulin (human) [VariZIG] is valuable for prophylaxis against VZV in high-risk children, particularly newborns and immunocompromised children (Chapter 245). Cytomegalovirus immune globulin (CMV-IG) is warranted for children at high risk for CMV disease, particularly solid organ and hematopoietic stem cell transplant patients, and can play a role in preventing injury to the infected fetus when administered to the pregnant patient (Chapter 252). Palivizumab, a monoclonal antibody with anti-RSV activity, is effective for preventing severe RSV lower respiratory tract disease in high-risk premature infants and has replaced respiratory syncytial virus immune globulin (Chapter 252); a more-potent monoclonal for RSV, motavizumab, is in clinical trials. Hepatitis B immune globulin (HBIG) is indicated in infants born to hepatitis B surface antigen-positive mothers (Chapter 350).

Bibliography

Andrei G, De Clercq E, Snoeck R. Drug targets in cytomegalovirus infection. Infect Disord Drug Targets. 2009;9:201-222.

Balfour HHJr. Antiviral drugs. N Engl J Med. 1999;340:1255-1268.

Caviness AC, Demmler DJ, Almendarez Y, et al. The prevalence of neonatal herpes simplex virus infection compared with serious bacterial illness in hospitalized neonates. J Pediatr. 2008;153:164-169.

Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Antiviral agents for the treatment and chemoprophylaxis of influenza. MMWR. 2011;60(1):1-25.

De Clercq E. Antiviral drugs in current clinical use. J Clin Virol. 2004;30:115-133.

James SH, Kimberlin DW, Whitley RJ. Antiviral therapy for herpesvirus central nervous system infections: Neonatal herpes simplex virus infection, herpes simplex encephalitis, and congenital cytomegalovirus infection. Antiviral Res. 2009;83:207-213.

Kimberlin DW. Antiviral therapies in children: has their time arrived? Pediatr Clin North Am. 2005;52:837-867.

Kimberlin DW. Management of HSV encephalitis in adults and neonates: diagnosis, prognosis and treatment. Herpes. 2007;14:11-16.

Kurbegov AC, Sokol RJ. Hepatitis B therapy in children. Expert Rev Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2009;3:39-49.

Littler E, Oberg B. Achievements and challenges in antiviral drug discovery. Antivir Chem Chemother. 2005;16:155-168.

Long SS. In defense of empiric acyclovir therapy in certain neonates. J Pediatr. 2008;153:157-158.

2011 The Medical Letter: Antiviral drugs for influenza. Med Lett. 2011;53(1355):1-3.

Nigro G, Adler SP, La Torre R, et al. Passive immunization during pregnancy for congenital cytomegalovirus infection. N Engl J Med. 2005;353:1350-1362.

Nokes JD, Cane PA. New strategies for control of respiratory syncytial virus infection. Curr Opin Infect Dis. 2008;21:639-643.

Oxford JS. Antivirals for the treatment and prevention of epidemic and pandemic influenza. Influenza Other Respi Viruses. 2007;1:27-34.

Pasternak B, Hviid A. Use of acyclovir, valacyclovir, and famciclovir in the first trimester of pregnancy and the risk of birth defects. JAMA. 2010;304(8):859-866.

Rungrotmongkol T, Intharathep P, Malaisree M, et al. Susceptibility of antiviral drugs against 2009 influenza A (H1N1) virus. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 2009;385:390-394.

Sugaya N, Tamura D, Yamazaki M, et al. Comparison of the clinical effectiveness of oseltamivir and zanamivir against influenza virus infection in children. Clin Infect Dis. 2008;47:339-345.

Whitley RJ. The role of oseltamivir in the treatment and prevention of influenza in children. Expert Opin Drug Metab Toxicol. 2007;3:755-767.