Prenatal Imaging

Published on 27/02/2015 by admin

Filed under Pediatrics

Last modified 22/04/2025

Print this page

rate 1 star rate 2 star rate 3 star rate 4 star rate 5 star
Your rating: none, Average: 0 (0 votes)

This article have been viewed 1189 times

Chapter 42

Prenatal Imaging

Vast improvements have been made in the diagnosis and therapy of fetal anomalies as a result of advances in imaging and surgical technology. Nowhere is this more applicable than in the fetal spine. Ultrasonography is the primary imaging modality for fetal evaluation and helps distinguish normal spine development from abnormal spine development while providing valuable information about spinal anomalies. Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is complementary to ultrasonography for assessment of spinal malformations, as it has the advantage of better detection and depiction of associated central nervous system (CNS) and non-CNS anomalies that may have a significant impact on postnatal neurologic function and quality of life.

The major lesion of the CNS currently amenable to fetal diagnosis and intervention is open spinal dysraphism, commonly referred to as myelomeningocele (MMC); this lesion is a significant driving force behind the use of highly detailed prenatal imaging. The osseous detail and real-time evaluation of lower extremity configuration, position, and motion detectable with ultrasonography, combined with soft tissue and parenchymal assessments with the use of MRI, provide the maternal-fetal medicine specialist and pediatric neurosurgeon with highly detailed anatomic information. Because the surgery is not without risk to the mother and the fetus, obtaining extremely accurate information is essential for determining surgical appropriateness and presurgical planning. When significant congenital anomalies are present outside of the CNS, information about associated spinal abnormalities is valuable for counseling and parental decision making regarding the management of the pregnancy, labor, and delivery or interruption of the pregnancy.

Imaging Techniques

The accuracy of identifying spinal anomalies during nontargeted screening ultrasonography varies, depending on the skill and experience of the operator. The accuracy of a referral center performing detailed targeting studies for a suspected neural tube defect (elevated maternal serum α-fetoprotein) is close to 100%. A detailed protocol should be performed. Because fetuses with open neural tube defects typically have Chiari II malformations, the fetal brain should be scanned initially. A small cisterna magna with rounded small cerebellum is termed the “banana sign” and is 99% sensitive in the diagnosis of a Chiari II malformation (Fig. 42-1). The frontal bones may be concave, and this is termed the “lemon sign.” This sign is less specific and may be present in 1% to 2% of normal fetuses and may resolve by the third trimester. Ventriculomegaly may be present. Axial and longitudinal views of the spine should be obtained. Spine ossification progresses from 10 to 22 weeks’ gestation. By 16 weeks’ gestation, neural arch ossification is complete to L5. By 19 weeks, S1 is completely ossified, and by 22 weeks, S2 is ossified. Splayed pedicles are best visualized in the transverse plane. An overlying sac may be imaged in transverse and longitudinal planes, with higher-frequency transducers showing cord tethering and placode contents (Fig. 42-2).

Fetal MRI is typically performed on 1.5 Tesla (T) magnets, although some centers are now performing fetal MRI at 3.0 T. A surface coil (torso, cardiac, or body phased-array) is used to maximize image quality. A standard localizer sequence generally facilitates quick identification of fetal position. This is used to guide the initial imaging plane, which should be appropriately aligned with the fetal anatomy in question. Subsequent imaging sequences are prescribed in orthogonal planes with respect to the fetal spine, each adjusted from the preceding image set, to account for changes in fetal position.

Ultrafast sequences are used to minimize image degradation by maternal and fetal movements. T2-weighted images provide most of the diagnostic information for the examination: single-shot fast spin echo (SSFSE) or half-Fourier acquisition single-shot turbo spin echo (HASTE) sequences at minimal slice thickness (2 to 4 mm). Fast T1-weighted gradient echo imaging is frequently attempted but seems to show satisfactory contrast resolution and signal-to-noise ratio only after approximately 26 weeks’ gestation. Extremely rapid gradient echo, echo planar imaging, with its high sensitivity to paramagnetic susceptibility may be used to identify osseous and vascular structures and hemorrhage. Diffusion-weighted imaging is increasingly being used to assess for acute ischemia.

Open Spinal Dysraphism

Etiology

Abnormalities in neurulation may result from defects in disjunction, the process by which the neural tube separates from the overlying ectoderm. A large site of complete failure of disjunction may result in MMC. Prenatally, the findings of MMC are clearly detectable with ultrasonography and MRI. In the presence of elevation of the neural placode, secondary to expansion of the subarachnoid space, the lesion is referred to as MMC (Fig. 42-3). This is distinguished from myeloschisis, also known as myelocele, where an open neural tube defect exists, but the subarachnoid space is not expanded, and the neural placode remains within the confines of the dysraphic spinal canal (Fig. 42-4). MMC occurs during the formation of the primitive neural tube (neurulation) in the third week of gestation, when a localized failure of neural tube closure occurs. This failure may occur anywhere along the length of the spinal cord, but it is most common in the lumbar region. The resulting lesion is an open spinal canal with a flat neural placode instead of a cylindrical spinal cord. Imaging reveals the failure of neurulation in the MMC as a posterior osseocutaneous defect. When present, the expansion of the subarachnoid space is readily apparent (see Fig. 42-3). The neurologic deficits sustained by the fetus are postulated to occur in stages—a “two-hit” hypothesis. The first “hit” is the original defect in neurulation that creates the dysraphism and any associated myelodysplasia. The second “hit” is the secondary chemical or physical trauma (or both) to the neural tissue as a result of its exposure to the intrauterine environment.

A unified theory regarding the pathogenesis of the associated Chiari II malformation was postulated by McLone and Knepper, who suggested that the open spinal canal and associated free drainage of cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) promote collapse of the primitive ventricular system and cause lack of expansion of the rhombencephalic vesicle, from which the posterior fossa develops. This lack of distention leads to an abnormally small posterior fossa and subsequent herniation and other associated malformations in the brain. The Chiari II malformation is a pancerebral anomaly, affecting broad areas of the brain. Abnormalities include herniation of the medulla, cerebellar tonsils, and vermis through the foramen magnum; a small posterior fossa; “beaking” of the tectum of the midbrain; an enlarged massa intermedia of the thalami; partial or complete callosal dysgenesis; and structural changes in the skull (Fig. 42-5). Migrational abnormalities, particularly subependymal gray matter heterotopia, also are commonly seen. The cause of hydrocephalus in patients with MMC is frequently debated. Current theories include mechanical obstruction secondary to anatomic changes associated with the Chiari II malformation and dysfunctional CSF absorption. Clinically, hydrocephalus may not be present at birth but may become apparent after early postnatal closure of the defect.

Treatment

Prenatal repair of MMC has been performed in the United States for over 10 years. The initial intent was to preserve distal neurologic function by covering the exposed spinal cord. Although early results may have suggested some improvement in distal sensorimotor function, prenatal repair serendipitously led to a reduction in hindbrain herniation and a possible decreased need for ventricular shunting.

Ultrasound examination of fetuses with MMC at 18 weeks’ gestational age frequently shows lower limb movements that correlate with the movements of unaffected fetuses, suggesting that loss of motor function in these patients may occur later in gestation. Perhaps the most compelling argument for in utero repair of MMC comes from the lesser degrees of neurologic deficits in many of the forms of closed spinal dysraphism in which the neural elements remain covered by skin (e.g., lipomyelomeningocele). The first report on fetal surgery in humans, by Adzick and colleagues, suggested that intrauterine repair of MMC results in improvements in neurologic function and hindbrain herniation. These findings recapitulated experiment results and prompted the first large multicenter trial to determine the role of fetal surgery in fetuses with MMC.

The Management of Myelomeningocele Study trial found that fetuses who underwent in utero repair of MMC demonstrated superior standardized test scores for motor skills and that twice as many children were walking independently at 30 months of age compared with those randomized to postnatal surgery. Additionally, prenatal repair led to a reduction in hindbrain herniation (Fig. 42-6), and these children were half as likely to require ventricular shunting.

image

Figure 42-6 Reversal of hindbrain herniation after fetal myelomeningocele repair.
A, A sagittal half-Fourier acquisition single-shot turbo spin echo (HASTE) magnetic resonance image of the same fetus as in Figure 42-5 reveals the dramatic improvement in the appearance of the brain 6 weeks after surgery. The hindbrain herniation has resolved, with return of the posterior fossa subarachnoid spaces (arrow). The supratentorial subarachnoid spaces are now normal, but the ventricles remain enlarged. B, An axial HASTE image through the posterior fossa shows the now normal appearance of the fourth ventricle (arrow).

MMC is generally not a fatal disease in utero or postnatally, and most prenatally diagnosed infants survive to lead productive lives. Fetal surgery is associated with premature delivery and its attendant complications, including fetal loss. Maternal complications may range from uterine rupture and hemorrhage to deep venous thrombosis. Despite this, hundreds of mothers and fetuses have undergone prenatal repair of MMC and, as a result of the multicenter study, prenatal repair is now considered the standard of care in the United States.

Closed Spinal Dysraphism

Many other spinal anomalies may be recognized in utero. Although none are candidates for prenatal surgery at this time, it is important to recognize these anomalies and distinguish them from MMC to allow for proper patient counseling.

Spinal dysraphism, particularly the terminal myelocystocele, is frequently seen in association with systemic anomalies, most commonly anomalies of the genitourinary and lower gastrointestinal systems (cloacal anomalies). This is likely caused by the relative proximity of the caudal cell mass to the cloaca. The caudal cell mass is the origin of the conus medullaris, filum terminale, and lower lumbar and sacral nerve roots. A high index of suspicion should be maintained for lower spinal anomalies when cloacal anomalies are present. The reverse also is true. Constellations of anomalies that commonly have associated congenital spinal malformations include the OEIS (omphalocele, exstrophy, imperforate anus, spinal anomalies), VACTERL (vertebral, anal atresia, cardiac, tracheal, esophageal, renal, limb), and Currarino triad (sacral hypogenesis, anorectal malformations, presacral teratoma or meningocele). The vertebral anomalies seen with OEIS and VACTERL are most commonly hemivertebrae or butterfly vertebrae, which may be detected prenatally if they distort the spinal alignment; however, they are generally difficult to diagnose in utero. More severe anomalies have been reported as well. The association of the notochord with the induction of visceral organ formation is a likely explanation of the associations between congenital vertebral and spinal cord anomalies and thoracic or abdominal anomalies, including the VACTERL association and congenital diaphragmatic hernia.

Lipomyelomeningocele

Premature disjunction of the cutaneous ectoderm from the neuroectoderm allows mesenchyme to contact the inner portion of the developing neural tube. As the tube begins to close, the mesenchyme is induced to become fat, the presence of which may interfere with neurulation. This may result in lipomyelomeningocele–lipomyeloschisis. These lesions are skin covered and consequently not associated with the Chiari II malformation or abnormal elevation of maternal serum or amniotic fluid α-fetoprotein and acetylcholinesterase (markers of an open neural tube). A small lipomyelomeningocele may be harder to detect with screening ultrasonography but should be apparent with MRI, particularly later in the second trimester and in the third trimester (Fig. 42-7). As in the case of MMC, the distinction between lipomyelomeningocele and lipomyeloschisis lies in the location of the placode–lipoma interface with respect to the plane of the back. The expansion of the subarachnoid space characterizes the lipomyelomeningocele, but in contrast to MMC, it is much less common than its flat counterpart. The placode in the lipomyelomeningocele is much more likely to be deformed, being rotated toward the lipoma and away from the protrusion of the meninges. This poses an additional problem for the pediatric neurosurgeon performing postnatal repair because the spinal nerve roots are similarly deformed, with shortened roots on the side of the lipoma, which tether the cord. The elongated roots on the side of the meninges must be carefully negotiated as the surgeon attempts to access the placode–lipoma interface.

Split Cord Malformation

Split cord malformation (SCM) is a developmental abnormality of the notochord. It is not always possible on imaging to distinguish between diastematomyelia (spinal cord and canal splitting) and diplomyelia (spinal cord and canal duplication). As such, SCM is the preferred terminology.

The spinal cord is focally split into two hemicords, often asymmetrically (Fig. 42-8). This may involve the entire anteroposterior aspect of the cord or a portion of the spinal cord, the latter being quite rare. Each hemicord contains a central canal, and at least one dorsal horn and one ventral horn, from which nerve roots arise. An osseous septum between dual dural tubes (type I) or fibrous septum within a single dural tube (type II) separates the hemicords. Occasionally, no intervening septum exists in the type II lesion. SCM most commonly occurs in the lumbar region, and the type I is frequently associated with vertebral body anomalies. Cervicothoracic junction lesions may be more common than is currently reported because they are often asymptomatic owing to the absence of spinal cord tethering.

Type I SCM is readily recognized with fetal imaging (see Fig. 42-8). An often subtle alteration in spinal alignment from the associated anomalous vertebral bodies should be a clue that a spinal anomaly is present. When present, the osseous septum may appear on ultrasonography as an echogenic structure traversing the spinal canal. Echo planar MRI techniques may be valuable in assessing for the osseous septum, which commonly tethers the spinal cord, and is significant in determining the extent of postnatal surgical intervention. The simple fibrous septum or cord duplication without intervening septum (type II) may be difficult to visualize prenatally, particularly when imaging is performed in the second trimester. SCM is present in 40% of MMC, although this most commonly involves only duplication or splitting of the placode, which may be impossible to detect prenatally. It is imperative to search for SCM when MMC is encountered because the spinal cord may remain tethered by the septum after MMC repair.

Terminal Myelocystocele

This rare malformation may represent a severe manifestation of the persistent terminal ventricle, resulting from an inability of CSF to escape from the neural tube during its formation. The marked dilation of the distal central canal is also referred to as the terminal ventricle of the spinal cord, which herniates through a posterior lumbosacral spinal defect. The leptomeninges herniate around the bulbous distal spinal cord (Fig. 42-9). With prenatal imaging, terminal myelocystocele may sometimes be distinguished from the MMC with close attention to the morphology and wall thickness of the protruding sac, the absence of Chiari II malformation, and the lack of elevation of maternal serum and amniotic fluid markers of an open neural tube defect. A degree of downward displacement of the cerebellar tonsils through the foramen magnum and reduction of the infratentorial and supratentorial subarachnoid spaces may develop late in gestation with a large terminal myelocystocele, but this should not be mistaken for the Chiari II malformation.

Meningocele

The simple posterior meningocele is characterized by a meningeal-lined CSF sac, which protrudes through a posterior osseous spinal defect (Fig. 42-10). The spinal cord does not enter the sac, although it may be associated with hypertrophy of the filum terminale or spinal cord tethering. Its etiology is not well understood, but some postulate that CSF pulsations cause the meninges to herniate through a focal posterior osseous defect. Most commonly encountered in the thoracic spine, these anomalies rarely may be present in utero and must be differentiated from thoracic MMC. Similar to the terminal myelocystocele and lipomyelomeningocele, these skin-covered (closed) lesions do not have an associated Chiari II malformation, and the maternal serum or amniotic fluid does not contain markers of an open neural tube defect.

Caudal Regression Syndrome

Caudal regression syndrome represents a wide spectrum of anomalies, ranging from coccygeal or lumbosacral hypogenesis to frank sirenomelia. Infants of mothers with diabetes are the most susceptible, and the incidence is 1 : 7500 live births. This entity may be diagnosed prenatally, by a single lower extremity in the most extreme form to an absence or reduction in number of lower vertebral segments in lesser degrees of involvement. The less severe forms may not be detectable prenatally.

The lower extent of the spine determines the type of caudal regression and the severity of the clinical and imaging findings. The more severe form is diagnosed (type I) when the spine ends at or above the S1 level. The lowest formed level may even be in the midthoracic region. The spinal cord terminates abnormally high, with an abrupt, blunted tip, rather than the smooth taper that should be seen with a normal conus medullaris. Associated deformation of the cauda equina is common, with anterior and posterior separation of nerve roots. A spine terminating at or below the S2 level (type II) contains many fewer malformations, although the distal-most portion of the conus medullaris would not be present, resulting in a blunted appearance. Typically, the spinal cord is tethered by a tight filum terminale or filum lipoma.

In unusual cases of mild caudal regression syndrome, only the tip of the conus medullaris may be absent, and the spinal cord may not be tethered. It is not expected that these findings would be detectable prenatally. This complex continuum is also associated with syndromes, including OEIS, VACTERL, and the Currarino triad.

Segmental Spinal Dysgenesis

Segmental spinal dysgenesis is a rare entity in which a focal segment of the lumbar or thoracic spine is agenetic or markedly hypogenetic. The spinal cord at this level is segmentally disrupted, the distal spinal cord is often abnormally large (but may be more normal), and a sharply angled focal kyphosis develops after birth. Some authors believe that segmental spinal dysgenesis falls within the caudal regression spectrum and that the morphology depends on the level of notochordal disruption. If the notochordal development is affected distally, caudal regression syndrome ensues, but if the lesion occurs more proximally, segmental spinal dysgenesis is seen. No known treatment is currently available to improve function in this condition, although postnatal surgical decompression has been reported to prevent worsening neurologic function.

Suggested Readings

Adzick, NS, Thom, EA, Spong, CY, et al. A randomized trial of prenatal versus postnatal repair of myelomeningocele. N Engl J Med. 2011;364(11):993–1004.

Glenn, OA, Barkovich, AJ. Magnetic resonance imaging of the fetal brain and spine: an increasingly important tool in prenatal diagnosis, part 1. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2006;27(8):1604–1611.

Glenn, OA, Barkovich, AJ. Magnetic resonance imaging of the fetal brain and spine: an increasingly important tool in prenatal diagnosis: part 2. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2006;27(9):1807–1814.

Griffiths, PD, Paley, MN, Widjaja, E, et al. In utero magnetic resonance imaging for brain and spinal abnormalities in fetuses. BMJ. 2005;331(7516):562–565.

Rossi, A, Gandolfo, C, Morana, G, et al. Current classification and imaging of congenital spinal abnormalities. Semin Roentgenol. 2006;41(4):250–273.

Bibliography

Adzick, NS, Sutton, LN, Crombleholme, TM, et al. Successful fetal surgery for spina bifida [letter]. Lancet. 1998;352:1666–1675.

Bruner, JP, Tulipan, N, Paschall, RL, et al. Fetal surgery for myelomeningocele and the incidence of shunt-dependent hydrocephalus. JAMA. 1999;282:1819–1825.

Dias, MS, McLone, DG. Hydrocephalus in the child with dysraphism. Neurosurg Clin North Am. 1993;4:715–726.

Hasan, SJ, Keirstead, HS, Muir, GD, et al. Axonal regeneration contributes to repair of injured brainstem-spinal neurons in embryonic chick. J Neurosci. 1993;13:492–507.

Heffez, DS, Aryanpur, J, Rotellini, NA, et al. Intrauterine repair of experimental surgically created dysraphism. Neurosurgery. 1993;32:1005–1010.

Inagaki, T, Schoenwoif, GC, Walker, ML. Experimental model: change in the posterior fossa with surgically induced spina bifida aperta in mouse. Pediatr Neurosurg. 1997;26:185–189.

Johnson, MP, Sutton, LN, Rintoul, N, et al. Fetal myelomeningocele repair: short-term clinical outcomes. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2003;189:482–487.

Korenromp, MJ, van Gool, JD, Bruinese, HW, et al. Early fetal leg movements in myelomeningocele [letter]. Lancet. 1986;1:917–918.

Larsen, WJ. Human embryology, 2nd ed. New York: Churchill Livingstone; 1997.

Levine, D, Barnes, PD, Madsen, JR, et al. Central nervous system abnormalities assessed with prenatal magnetic resonance imaging. Obstet Gynecol. 1999;94:1011–1019.

McLone, DG, Knepper, PA. The cause of Chiari II malformation: a unified theory. Pediatr Neurosci. 1989;15:1–12.

Meuli, M, Meuli-Simmen, C, Hutchins, GM, et al. The spinal cord lesion in human fetuses with myelomeningocele: implications for fetal surgery. J Pediatr Surg. 1997;32:448–452.

Paek, BW, Farmer, DL, Wilkinson, CC, et al. Hindbrain herniation develops in surgically created myelomeningocele but is absent after repair in fetal lambs. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2000;183:1119–1123.

Pilu, G, Falco, P, Perolo, A, et al. Ultrasound evaluation of the fetal neural axis. In: Callen P, ed. Ultrasonography in obstetrics and gynecology. 4th ed. Philadelphia, PA: Saunders; 2000:277–306.

Sutton, LN, Adzick, NS, Bilaniuk, LT, et al. Improvement in hindbrain herniation demonstrated by serial fetal magnetic resonance imaging following fetal surgery for myelomeningocele. JAMA. 1999;282:1826–1831.

Tulipan, N, Bruner, JP, Hernanz-Schulman, M, et al. Effect of intrauterine myelomeningocele repair on central nervous system structure and function. Pediatr Neurosurg. 1999;31:183–188.

Tulipan, N, Hernanz-Schulman, M, Lowe, LH, et al. Intrauterine myelomeningocele repair reverses preexisting hindbrain herniation. Pediatr Neurosurg. 1999;31:137–142.

Walsh, DS, Adzick, NS, Sutton, LN, et al. The rationale for in utero repair of myelomeningocele. Fetal Diagn Ther. 2001;16:312–322.