Postoperative Respiratory Care

Published on 07/02/2015 by admin

Filed under Anesthesiology

Last modified 22/04/2025

Print this page

rate 1 star rate 2 star rate 3 star rate 4 star rate 5 star
Your rating: none, Average: 0 (0 votes)

This article have been viewed 1409 times

Chapter 28 Postoperative Respiratory Care

Patients undergoing cardiac surgery experience physiologic stresses from anesthesia, thoracotomy, surgical manipulation, and cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB). Each of these interventions can create transient deleterious effects on pulmonary function even with normal lungs; the effects may be exaggerated in the presence of preexisting pulmonary pathologic processes. Important pulmonary changes after cardiac surgery include diminished functional residual capacity (FRC) after general anesthesia and muscle relaxants, transient 50% to 75% reduction in vital capacity (VC) after median sternotomy and intrathoracic manipulation, atelectasis, and increased intravascular lung water. Acute FRC reduction results in arterial hypoxemia due to mismatch between ventilation and perfusion and in diminished lung compliance with increased work of breathing. This additional work of breathing, which increases oxygen consumption by up to 20% in spontaneously breathing patients, also increases myocardial work at a time when myocardial reserves may be limited. Changes in spirometric measurements and respiratory muscle strength can last up to 8 weeks postoperatively.1

Thus, a sizeable proportion of cardiac surgical patients can be expected to have respiratory complications. Acute lung injury, sometimes progressing to acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS), can occur in up to 12% of postoperative cardiac patients.

RISK FACTORS FOR RESPIRATORY INSUFFICIENCY

The lung is especially vulnerable because disturbances may affect it directly (atelectasis, effusions, pneumonia) or indirectly (via fluid overload in heart failure, as the result of mediator release during CPB, shock states, or infection, or via changes in respiratory pump function as with phrenic nerve injury). Postoperative status will be determined in part by the patient’s preoperative pulmonary reserve, as well as by the level of stress imposed by the procedure. Thus, a patient with reduced VC due to restrictive lung disease, undergoing minimally invasive surgery, may have fewer postoperative pulmonary issues than a relatively healthy patient undergoing simultaneous coronary artery bypass grafting and valve replacement with its accompanying longer operative/anesthetic and CPB times. Respiratory muscle weakness contributes to postoperative pulmonary dysfunction, and prophylactic inspiratory muscle training has been shown to improve respiratory muscle function, pulmonary function tests, and gas exchange. Training reduces the percentage of patients requiring more than 24 hours of postoperative ventilation support from 26% to 5%.

Assessing Risk Based on Preoperative Status

The Society of Thoracic Surgeons (STS) National Adult Cardiac Surgery Database is widely used and offers, in addition to a mortality model, a model customized to predict prolonged ventilation.2 Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) might be expected to be a major risk for postoperative morbidity and mortality. However, hospital mortality with mild-to-moderate COPD is not especially high; it is the minority of patients with severe COPD, especially those older than the age of 75 years or receiving corticosteroids, who are at highest risk. Patients with preexisting COPD have higher rates of pulmonary complications (12%), atrial fibrillation (27%), and death (7%).3 Obesity, defined by increased body mass index, does not appear to increase the risk of postoperative respiratory failure.

Studies have used multivariate regression techniques to elucidate factors specifically associated with postoperative respiratory failure (Table 28-1).47 They differ in their endpoints for outcome and in their choice of preoperative versus operative versus postoperative variables. The STS model was found to be the single best predictor of mechanical ventilation support for longer than 72 hours but also identified mitral valvular disease, age, vasopressor and inotrope use, renal failure, operative urgency, type of operation, preoperative ventilation, prior cardiac surgery, female gender, myocardial infarction within 30 days, and previous stroke as contributors.5 None of these models, general or specific for respiratory complications, is sufficiently sensitive or specific to prohibit consideration of surgery for an individual patient, but all provide the clinician with early warning for patients at high risk.

Table 28-1 Factors Predicting Postoperative Respiratory Outcome

Study Endpoint Risk Factors
Spivack et al, 19964 Mechanical ventilation > 48 hr

Branca et al, 20015 Mechanical ventilation > 72 hr

Rady et al, 19996 Extubation failure (reintubation after initial extubation)

Canver and Chandra, 20037 Mechanical Ventilation > 72 hr

LVEF = left ventricular ejection fraction; CHF = congestive heart failure; STS = Society of Thoracic Surgeons; CABG = coronary artery bypass grafting; COPD = chronic obstructive pulmonary disease; BUN = blood urea nitrogen; DO2 = systemic oxygen delivery; CPB = cardiopulmonary bypass; Hct = hematocrit.

Postoperative Events

The expected postoperative course is a short period of ventilation support while the patient is warmed, allowed to awaken, and observed for bleeding or hemodynamic instability. Preoperative risks, issues with difficult intubation, and operating room events should be communicated from the operating room team to the ICU team at the time of ICU admission. Box 28-1 outlines criteria to be met before routine extubation.

Before extubation, a quick neurologic examination should be performed to rule out new cerebrovascular events, presence of excess opioids, or residual neuromuscular blocking agents. Knowledge that the work of breathing can consume up to 20% of CO should preclude extubation in the hemodynamically unstable patient. Although patients may be successfully extubated while on IABP, the need to lie flat after balloon and sheath removal may dictate continued temporary ventilator support.

Postoperative care of low-risk cardiac surgical patients has come to resemble a recovery room model, but high-risk patients benefit from postoperative involvement of anesthesiologists, cardiologists, and critical care specialists. The presence of full-time ICU staff physicians improves outcome and is now recommended by the Leapfrog Group as a patient safety standard.8

Hospital-acquired infections are an important cause of postoperative morbidity, and nosocomial pneumonia is common in patients receiving continuous mechanical ventilation. The actuarial risk of ventilator-associated pneumonia appears to be around 1% per day when diagnosed using protected specimen brush and quantitative culture techniques. Strategies thought to be effective at reducing the incidence of ventilator-associated pneumonia include early removal of nasogastric or endotracheal tubes, formal infection control programs, handwashing, semirecumbent positioning of the patient, avoiding unnecessary reintubation, providing adequate nutritional support, avoiding gastric overdistention, use of the oral rather than the nasal route for intubation, scheduled drainage of condensate from ventilator circuits, and maintenance of adequate endotracheal tube cuff pressure.

DIAGNOSIS OF ACUTE LUNG INJURY AND ACUTE RESPIRATORY DISTRESS SYNDROME

ARDS may develop as a sequela of CPB, or, more commonly, in the postoperative patient with cardiogenic shock, sepsis, or multisystem organ failure. Components of ARDS include diffuse alveolar damage resulting from endothelial and type I epithelial cell necrosis, and noncardiogenic pulmonary edema due to breakdown of the endothelial barrier with subsequent vascular permeability. The exudative phase of ARDS occurs in the first 3 days after the precipitating event and is thought to be mediated by neutrophil activation and sequestration. Neutrophils release mediators, causing endothelial damage. Ultimately, the alveolar spaces fill up with fluid as a result of increased endothelial permeability.

Intravascular and intra-alveolar fibrin deposition is common. Procoagulant activity becomes enhanced in ARDS, and bronchoalveolar lavage reveals increased tissue factor levels. The clinical presentation is typically an acute onset of severe arterial hypoxemia resistant to oxygen therapy, with a PaO2 to FIO2 (P/F) ratio of less than 200 mmHg. ARDS is classically diagnosed only in the absence of left ventricular failure, which complicates the issue in the postoperative cardiac patient who may also be in congestive heart failure (CHF). Other findings in ARDS include decreased lung compliance (<30 mL/cm H2O) and bilateral infiltrates on the chest radiograph.

The proliferative phase of ARDS occurs on days 3 to 7 as inflammatory cells accumulate as a result of chemoattractants released by the neutrophils. At this stage, the normal repair process would remove debris and begin repair, but a disordered repair process may result in exuberant fibrosis, stiff lungs, and inefficient gas exchange. Evidence suggests that careful medical and ventilator management may affect this process. Any precipitating factors should be addressed (e.g., draining closed-space infections). Conventional ventilator support following cardiac surgery is to maintain large tidal volumes (typically 10 to 12 mL/kg) to reopen atelectatic but potentially functional alveoli. The problem is that the compromised lung is no longer homogeneous and high pressures can further damage the remaining normal lung over time. Direct mechanical injury may occur as a result of overdistention (volutrauma), high pressures (barotrauma), or shear injury from repetitive opening and closing. “Biotrauma” may also occur as a result of inflammatory mediator release and impaired antibacterial barriers. Current clinical practice with known or suspected lung injury is to limit inflation pressures. The maximal “safe” inflation pressure is not known, but evidence favors keeping peak inspiratory pressures at less than 35 cm H2O and restricting tidal volumes to about 6 mL/kg of ideal body weight. The landmark ARDSNet trial randomized patients to 6 mL/kg versus 12 mL/kg of ideal body weight and demonstrated a significant difference in 28-day survival with the low-tidal-volume group.9

Cardiopulmonary Interactions

Understanding cardiopulmonary interactions associated with mechanical ventilation is essential. Hemodynamic changes may occur secondary to changes in lung volume and intrathoracic pressure even when tidal volume remains constant.10 Pulmonary vascular resistance and mechanical heart-lung interactions play prominent roles in determining the hemodynamic response to mechanical ventilation. Because lung inflation alters pulmonary vascular resistance and right ventricular wall tension, there are limits to intrathoracic pressure that a damaged heart will tolerate. High lung volumes may also mechanically limit cardiac volumes. In patients with airflow obstruction, occult PEEP (auto-PEEP) may also contribute to hypotension and low CO. Auto-PEEP can be detected by respiratory waveform monitoring or by pressure monitoring with the ventilator’s expiratory port held closed at end-exhalation in patients who are not spontaneously breathing. Auto-PEEP often responds to bronchodilators and/or increased expiratory time to permit more complete exhalation.

GENERAL SUPPORT ISSUES

The Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality has identified a number of patient safety practices applicable to the ICU patient; at the top of the list are appropriate venothromboembolism (VTE) prophylaxis, use of perioperative β-blockers, use of maximum sterile barriers during catheter insertion, and use of antibiotic prophylaxis.11 Standard practice in icu patients includes prophylaxis against gastrointestinal bleeding with histamine blockers or proton pump inhibitors, unless the patient is receiving continuous gastric feedings; head of bed elevation to 30 degrees or more in hemodynamically stable patients; a brief daily wake-up from sedation; use of in-line suction catheters; tight glucose control; and appropriate VTE prophylaxis. Box 28-2 summarizes these risk-reduction efforts.

Impediments to Weaning and Extubation

Factors limiting the removal of mechanical ventilatory support include delirium, neurologic dysfunction, unstable hemodynamics, respiratory muscle dysfunction, renal failure with fluid overload, and sepsis. Figure 28-1 outlines one approach to identifying readiness to wean and possible alternative approaches to weaning.

Neurologic Complications

Delirium is common in long-stay ICU patients and is associated with higher costs in the ICU unit and for the entire hospital stay.12 Transient postoperative delirium occurs in about 7% of patients, resolving spontaneously or with pharmacologic intervention in almost all patients by postoperative day 6. Alcohol or benzodiazepine withdrawal should be considered in the differential diagnosis of delirium. Initial management of agitation consists of reassurance and orientation of the patient and control of pain with opioids.

Diaphragmatic paralysis may complicate any procedure, but it is more common in patients undergoing reoperation, owing to the difficulty in identifying the phrenic nerve in fibrotic pericardial tissue. The diagnosis of diaphragmatic paralysis should be considered whenever a patient fails to wean from mechanical ventilation; it should be documented by observing paradoxical movement of the diaphragm during inspiration and by comparing vital capacity (VC) and tidal volume (Vt) in the supine and seated positions. Differences in supine and seated VC of more than 10% to 15% should prompt fluoroscopic examination of the diaphragm (“sniff” test). Bilateral paralysis may be missed by this test, because comparison of left and right diaphragmatic excursion has lower specificity when both diaphragms are involved. Transient diaphragmatic paralysis can occur secondary to cold injury to the phrenic nerve. Less often, the phrenic nerve is injured or transected during dissection of the internal mammary arteries or during mobilization of the heart in patients undergoing reoperation.

MODES OF VENTILATOR SUPPORT

Positive-pressure ventilators employed outside the operating room have a nonrebreathing circuit, may be volume or pressure limited, and may be triggered by changes in flow or changes in pressure. All modern ventilators contain multiple modes of ventilatory support that accommodate both mandatory and patient-triggered breaths. The most common modes of positive-pressure ventilation are assist-control (A/C), synchronized intermittent mandatory ventilation (SIMV), and pressure-support ventilation (PSV). Volume-cycled support is still most common. With volume modes, the inspiratory flow rate, targeted volume, and inspiratory time are set by the clinician, and inspiratory peak pressure will vary depending on the patient’s lung compliance and synchrony with the ventilator. Volume cycling ensures consistent delivery of a set tidal volume as long as the pressure limit is not exceeded. With nonhomogeneous lung pathology, however, delivered volume tends to flow to the area of low resistance, which may result in overdistention of healthy segments of lung and underinflation of atelectatic segments and consequent ventilation-perfusion mismatching.

Intermittent mandatory ventilation (IMV) and then SIMV were developed to facilitate weaning from mechanical ventilatory support. With either IMV modality, a basal respiratory rate is set by the clinician, which may be supplemented by patient-initiated breaths. In contrast to A/C ventilation, however, the tidal volume of the patient’s spontaneous breaths will be determined by the patient’s own respiratory strength and lung compliance rather than delivered as a preset volume. SIMV mode is appropriate for patients with normal lungs recovering from opioid anesthesia. Weaning is accomplished by reducing the mandatory IMV rate and allowing the patient to assume more and more of the respiratory effort over time.

LIBERATION FROM MECHANICAL SUPPORT (WEANING)

When terminating mechanical ventilation, two phases of decision-making are involved. First, there should be resolution of the initial process for which mechanical ventilation was begun. The patient cannot be septic, hemodynamically unstable, or burdened with excessive respiratory secretions. If these general criteria are met, then specific weaning criteria can be examined. These include oxygenation (typically a Pao2 > 60 mm Hg on 35% inspired oxygen and low levels of PEEP), adequate oxygen transport (measurable by O2 extraction ratio or assumed if the cardiac index is adequate and lactic acidosis is not present), adequate respiratory mechanics (tidal volume, maximal inspiratory pressure) and adequate respiratory reserve (minute ventilation at rest of < 10 L/min), and a low frequency/tidal volume ratio (f/Vt < 100) indicating adequate volume at a sustainable respiratory rate.

Weaning: The Process

The actual process of weaning from mechanical ventilatory support must be individualized. There is no “one size fits all” method. Whereas gradually lowering the rate in increments of two breaths per minute generally works for short-term ventilatory support, long-term patients often have difficulty making the transition from SIMV rates of 2 to CPAP. The time-honored method of weaning by maintaining a patient on full ventilatory support alternating with increasingly longer periods of spontaneous ventilation on a T-piece is effective but time consuming because it requires setting up additional equipment and a nurse or respiratory therapist to be immediately available at bedside during each weaning attempt. Breath-to-breath monitoring, display of tidal volumes, and ventilator alarms will not be available during a T-piece trial. More commonly, pressure support is used as an adjunct to weaning either with IMV or CPAP while still connected to the ventilator and its alarm system. The preference is to use CPAP with pressure support alone (i.e., no additional IMV rate) because mechanical ventilation introduces one more variable into the evaluation of a patient’s progress. Sufficient CPAP is applied to maintain open alveoli (generally 5 to 8 cm H2O but often higher when recovering from acute lung injury/ARDS) and then the pressure support level titrated to provide the patient with sufficient volume and a respiratory rate less than 24 breaths per minute. As the patient’s exercise tolerance improves, the pressure support level can be lowered in increments of 2 to 3 cm H2O. It is usually necessary to address fluid overload, nutritional support, and other nonpulmonary factors to achieve the pressure support reduction.

Inability to Wean

A small percentage of patients will not be able to wean from ventilator support despite all efforts. Predictive models, however, are rarely useful for deciding which individuals with multisystem failure will not benefit from continuation of aggressive life support.

The experience has been that it is rarely a single problem, but the interaction among multiple morbidities that creates a situation in which the patient may not separate from the ventilator. At this point, a frank discussion with the patient (if he or she has decisional capacity) or the health care proxy can be helpful in defining the benefits and burdens of further therapy and the patient’s desires. Consultation from the hospital’s ethics team may be very helpful. Patients who remain in a low cardiac output state and who have sustained multiorgan failure rarely if ever end their dependence on high-technology support, including ventilation and hemodialysis. On the other hand, malnutrition and deconditioning in the absence of ongoing sepsis and organ system failure sometimes respond to prolonged rehabilitation, which may be better handled by a long-term ventilation facility than an acute-care hospital. Recommendations for the difficult-to-wean cardiac surgical patient are summarized in Boxes 28-3 and 28-4.

SUMMARY

REFERENCES

1. Johnson D., Hurst T., Thompson D., et al. Respiratory function after cardiac surgery. J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth. 1996;10:571.

2. The Society of Thoracic Surgeons. 30-Day operative mortality and morbidity risk models. Ann Thorac Surg. 2003;75:1856.

3. Samuels L.E., Kaufman M.S., Morris R.J., et al. Coronary artery bypass grafting in patients with COPD. Chest. 1998;113:878.

4. Spivack S.D., Shinozaki T., Albertini J.J., Deane R. Preoperative prediction of postoperative respiratory outcome. Coronary artery bypass grafting. Chest. 1996;109:1222-1230.

5. Branca P., McGaw P., Light R.W., et al. Factors associated with prolonged mechanical ventilation following coronary artery bypass surgery. Chest. 2001;119:537.

6. Rady M.Y., Ryan T. Perioperative predictors of extubation failure and the effect on clinical outcome after cardiac surgery. Crit Care Med. 1996;27:340.

7. Canver C.C., Chandra J. Intraoperative and postoperative risk factors for respiratory failure after coronary bypass. Ann Thorac Surg. 2003;75:853.

8. www.leapfroggroup.org/factsheets/ICU_factsheet.pdf accessed on April 28, 2004

9. The Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome Network. Ventilation with lower tidal volumes as compared with traditional tidal volumes for acute lung injury and the acute respiratory distress syndrome. N Engl J Med. 2000;342:1301.

10. Steingrub J.S., Tidswell M.A., Higgins T.L. Hemodynamic consequences of heart-lung interactions. J Intens Care Med. 2003;18:92.

11. http://www.AHRQ.gov/clinic/ptsafety/addend.htm. Accessed May 20, 2004

12. Milbrandt E.B., Deppen S., Harrison P.L., et al. Costs associated with delirium in mechanically ventilated patients. Crit Care Med. 2004;31:955.

13. Nalos P.C., Kass R.M., Gang E.S., et al. Life-threatening postoperative pulmonary complications in patients with previous amiodarone pulmonary toxicity undergoing cardiothoracic operations. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 1987;93:904.