Physical Examination

Surgical dressings, chest tubes attached to suction, fluid in the mediastinum and pleural spaces, peripheral edema, and temperature gradients can distort or mask information obtained by the classic techniques of inspection, palpation, and auscultation in the postoperative period. However, the physician should not be deterred from applying these basic techniques in view of the potential benefit. Physical examination may be of great value in diagnosing gross or acute pathology, such as pneumothorax, hemothorax, or acute valvular insufficiency, but it is of limited value in diagnosing and managing ventricular failure. For example, in the critical care setting, experienced clinicians (e.g., internists) using only physical findings often misjudge cardiac filling pressures by a large margin. Low CO in particular is not consistently recognized by clinical signs, and systemic BP does not correlate with CO after cardiac surgery. Oliguria and metabolic acidosis, classic indicators of a low CO, are not always reliable because of the polyuria induced by hypothermia, oxygen debts induced during CPB causing acidosis, and medications or fluids given during or immediately after bypass.

Although clinicians are taught that the adequacy of CO can be assessed by the quality of the pulses, capillary refill, and peripheral temperature, there is no relationship between these indicators of peripheral perfusion and CO or calculated systemic vascular resistance (SVR) in the postoperative period. By the first postoperative day, there is a crude correlation between peripheral temperature and cardiac index (CI) (r = −0.60). Many patients arrive in the ICU in a hypothermic state, and residual anesthetic agents can decrease the threshold for peripheral vasoconstriction in response to this condition. A patient’s extremities may therefore remain warm despite a hypothermic core or a decreasing CO. Even after temperature stabilization on the first postoperative day, the relationship between peripheral perfusion and CO is too crude to be used for hemodynamic management.

Invasive Monitoring

Despite the lack of a proven benefit with pulmonary artery (PA) catheterization, most patients in North America continue to have this monitor placed for cardiac surgery. This reflects a desire to have the information regarding myocardial performance readily at hand, and the potential difficulty in changing to PA catheterization in an emergency requiring resuscitation. Many cardiac anesthesiologists believe that the lack of evidence regarding the PA catheter may reflect the lack of a well-designed randomized trial. There can be little doubt that management of acute heart failure is facilitated by measures of filling pressures and CO. Postoperatively, many cardiac surgical centers do not have in-house physicians, and surgeons believe they can obtain more objective data over the telephone if a PA catheter is in place.

Use of the fiberoptic PA catheter to continuously monitor mixed venous oxygen saturation (SO₂) helps evaluate the adequacy of DO₂ and allows continuous assessment of the response to therapy, which may affect DO₂ or O₂ (e.g., PEEP therapy). The trend in the SO₂ may function as an early warning signal of worsening in the oxygen supply-demand relationship as DO₂ falls or O₂ increases. Catheters that continuously measure the CO are also available. A wire coil on the catheter warms the blood passing by it at time intervals determined by an algorithm, and the measured changes in temperature at the tip of the catheter are used to provide a continuous display of the CO. Although the CO displayed needs gathering of information over several minutes and is therefore not as quick as conventional thermodilution, it avoids having to give injected volumes to the patient (which can add up to a significant amount every 24 hours) and provides trends that may give earlier warning than intermittent injections.

Echocardiography

There can be little doubt that echocardiography is the technique of choice for acute assessment of cardiac function. Just as transesophageal echocardiography (TEE) has become essential for intraoperative management in a variety of conditions, several studies document its utility in the postoperative period in the presence and absence of the PA catheter.² It provides information that may lead to urgent surgery or prevent unnecessary surgery, gives important information about cardiac preload, and can detect acute structural and functional abnormalities. Although transthoracic echocardiography (TTE) can be performed more rapidly in this setting, adequate images can be obtained only in about 50% of patients in the ICU.

Postoperative Arrhythmias

Patients with preoperative or newly acquired noncompliant ventricles need a correctly timed atrial contraction to provide satisfactory ventricular filling, especially when they are in sinus rhythm preoperatively. Although atrial contraction provides 15% to 20% of ventricular filling, this may be more important in postoperative patients, when ventricular dysfunction and reduced compliance may be present. Rate and rhythm disorders need to be corrected when possible, using epicardial pacing wires. Approaches to postoperative rate and rhythm disturbances are shown in Table 27-1.

Table 27-1 Postoperative Rate and Rhythm Disturbances

Later in the postoperative period (days 1 through 3), supraventricular tachyarrhythmias become a major problem, with atrial fibrillation (AF) predominating. The overall incidence is between 30% and 40%, but with increasing age and valvular surgery the incidence may be in excess of 60%. There are probably many reasons for this, including genetic factors, inadequate atrial protection during surgery, electrolyte abnormalities, change in atrial size with fluid shifts, epicardial inflammation, stress, and irritation. Randomized trials of off-pump coronary artery bypass grafting (OPCAB) have found a similar incidence of postoperative AF compared with on-pump CABG.³

When AF or other supraventricular arrhythmias develop, treatment is often urgently required for symptomatic relief or hemodynamic benefit. The longer a patient remains in AF, the more difficult it may be to convert, and the greater is the risk for thrombus formation and embolization.⁴ Treatable underlying conditions such as electrolyte disturbances or pain should be corrected while specific pharmacologic therapy is being instituted. Paroxysmal supraventricular tachycardia (uncommon in this setting) can be abolished or converted by intravenous adenosine, and atrial flutter can sometimes be converted by overdrive atrial pacing by temporary wires placed at the time of surgery. Electrical cardioversion may be required if hypotension is caused by the rapid rate; however, atrial arrhythmias tend to recur in this setting. Rate control for AF or flutter can be achieved with a variety of atrioventricular nodal blocking drugs, and conversion is facilitated by many of these drugs as well. Table 27-2 summarizes the various treatment modalities for supraventricular arrhythmias. If conversion to sinus rhythm does not occur, electrical cardioversion in the presence of antiarrhythmic drug therapy should be attempted or anticoagulation with warfarin (Coumadin) instituted.

Table 27-2 Treatment Modalities for Supraventricular Arrhythmias