Posterior Mini-Incision Hamstring Harvest Approach for Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction

Published on 11/04/2015 by admin

Filed under Orthopaedics

Last modified 22/04/2025

Print this page

rate 1 star rate 2 star rate 3 star rate 4 star rate 5 star
Your rating: none, Average: 0 (0 votes)

This article have been viewed 1790 times

Chapter 13 Posterior Mini-Incision Hamstring Harvest Approach for Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction*

Overview

Hamstring (HS) use for anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR) has increased greatly in the past 5 years as improved fixation techniques have allowed stability rates to meet or exceed those of bone–patellar tendon–bone (BPTB) grafts.1 It has been said that the harvest is the most difficult part of HS ACLR2 and may require a learning curve of roughly 50 procedures.3

The primary difficulty is that the intertendinous cross-connections of the semitendinosus (ST) and gracilis (Gr) must be sectioned before the tendon stripper is used to harvest the tendons. If they are not, the tendons can be cut too short to use, necessitating an unplanned switch to a different graft. These cross-connections, however, are significantly posterior to the traditional anterior harvest incision, requiring often-difficult retraction and dissection to reach. The primary benefit of the posterior approach is that it puts the incision in the area of the cross-connections, thus facilitating their visualization and sectioning.

The second benefit of the technique is that it allows easier location and identification of the ST and Gr in the posterior incision, where they are separate from each other and easy to find. In the area of the traditional anterior approach, the tendons exist as a single insertional structure, which requires posterior dissection for positive identification of individual tendons. This is made more difficult by the close apposition of the superficial fascial sheath anteriorly, whereas posteriorly the fascia is separated from the tendons by fat. The anterior incision, when used in conjunction with the posterior mini-incision, is then used only for tibial tunnel drilling and tibial fixation. It can thus be made much smaller than in the traditional anterior technique, only about 1 inch in length.

The author has used this technique continuously without problem for 15 years since devising it after 6 years of experience with the traditional anterior approach.

Anatomy

The accessory ST tendon is the primary structure leading to premature amputation of the ST tendon after tendon harvesting. This structure is not described in any standard anatomy texts. However, several papers have described it.46 It is present in about 70% of patients. Other cross-connections exist variably from the ST and Gr tendons. In some patients they are thin and will be easily cut with a tendon stripper. However, the accessory ST in particular can be almost as thick as the main trunk of the ST. Especially in these cases, the tendon stripper can easily sever the main trunk of the ST, rendering it too short to use. The variability of the anatomy is such that it is difficult to devise a consistent plan for freeing the tendon using the traditional approach, except to run a scissors along both sides of both tendons. Branches of the saphenous nerve, and indeed its main trunk, are very close by, and saphenous neurapraxia is very common after these dissections. The takeoff of the accessory ST was shown in our studies to be an average of 5 to 6 cm posterior to the tibial crest. Although orthopaedic surgeons rarely operate posteriorly and may be apprehensive about a posterior approach, the posterior approach does not subject neurovascular structures to significant risk. Our cadaver studies showed that the closest neurovascular structure was the popliteal artery, but in eight specimens it was always at least 2.9 cm away from the ST tendon. It was also shielded from the ST tendon by the semimembranosus muscle.

Surgical Technique

Making the Posterior Skin Incision

The ST is the most prominent tendinous structure in the popliteal fossa and runs just medially to the midline. The affected lower extremity is externally rotated, and the knee is flexed about 30 degrees. The surgeon bends over the leg to see posteromedially. The incision should be made directly over it in the popliteal fossa, shading slightly anteromedially (Fig. 13-1). If the ST cannot be felt, the incision can be put into the soft spot in the skin just medial to the midline. The location of this incision is not critical because the tendon can always be found by moving the highly mobile skin in this area. The incision should be made 3 cm in length initially but need only be 2 cm in length once experience is gained. It should be put within or parallel to a skin crease. After the dermis is incised with a #15 blade, the subcutaneous tissue is opened by spreading with Metzenbaum scissors.

Identifying the Semitendinosus in the Anterior Incision

A right-angle clamp is inserted in the anterior incision and passed around the ST tendon to grasp a ¼-inch Penrose drain (Fig. 13-3). The surgeon’s other index finger is still under the tendon and guides the clamp. The surgeon may insert the short end of an Army-Navy retractor and identify the tendon by direct visualization. A ¼-inch Penrose is then passed around the tendon and clamped with a right angle.

Identifying the Gracilis

Using the ST as a guide, the Gr can be found either in the posterior or anterior incision (Fig. 13-4) either before or after the ST is stripped proximally. If the ST is 30 cm or longer, we do not harvest the Gr but rather use a four-strand ST graft.

Harvesting the Semitendinosus and Sectioning the Accessory Semitendinosus

A small, closed corkscrew tendon stripper is passed around the ST near its common insertion with the Gr without disrupting it. It is gently but firmly passed proximally with a firm rotary, back-and-forth motion. Resistance will be felt when the stripper encounters the accessory ST (Fig. 13-5). At this point the stripper should be carefully advanced another 1 or 2 cm, taking care not to apply excessive force. Two Senne rakes are then placed in the posterior incision, and the mobile skin is moved anteriorly over the head and neck of the tendon stripper to expose them while maintaining firm pressure on the stripper. The surgeon uses a forceps and Metz scissors to dissect the filmy tissue off the stripper neck. Sitting directly on the neck of the tendon stripper will be the accessory ST, with the main trunk of the tendon extending outward from the corkscrew (Fig. 13-6). This accessory ST should be cut with either a Metz scissors or a #15 blade. The stripper will now slide freely toward the proximal. It should be pushed until the tendon is freed proximally while countertension is maintained with a ¼-inch Penrose or index finger near its insertion. Once freed, the ST is delivered out the anterior incision.

Freeing the Tendon Distally

With the two (or one) tendons delivered out the anterior incision, the periosteum is scored parallel and to the deep side of the tendon(s) (Fig. 13-7). An additional 2 cm of periosteum can then be harvested in line with the insertion, essentially prolonging it with tough tissue that also has the benefit of the growth factors found on its cambium layer for intratunnel fixation and ingrowth.

Harvest Problems with the Traditional Approach and Solutions Using the Combined Posterior/Anterior Mini-Incision Approach

References

1 Prodromos CC, Joyce BT, Shi KS, et al. A meta-analysis of stability after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction as a function of hamstring versus patellar tendon graft and fixation type. Arthroscopy. 2005;21:1202-1208.

2 Williams RJIII, Hyman J, Petrigliano F, et al. Anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction with a four-strand hamstring tendon autograft. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2004;86A:225-232.

3 Howell SM. Principles of hamstring fixation. ACL reconstruction: from graft choices and fixation to single and dual tunnel techniques. Instruction course presented at the meeting of the Arthroscopy Association of North America, Vancouver, BC, Canada. May 2005.

4 Prodromos CC, Han YS, Keller BL, et al. Posterior mini-incision technique for hamstring anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction graft harvest. Arthroscopy. 2005;21:130-137.

5 Ferrari JD, Ferrari DA. The semitendinosus: anatomic considerations in tendon harvesting. Orthop Rev. 1991;20:1085-1088.

6 Pagnani MJ, Warner JJ, O’Brien SJ, et al. Anatomic considerations in harvesting the semitendinosus and gracilis tendons and a technique of harvest. Am J Sports Med. 1993;21:565-571.

7 Portland GH, Martin D, Keene G, et al. Injury to the infrapatellar branch of the saphenous nerve in anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: comparison of horizontal versus vertical harvest site incisions. Arthroscopy. 2005;21:281-285.

8 Spicer DDM, Blagg SE, Unwin AJ, et al. Anterior knee symptoms after four-strand hamstring tendon anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2000;8:286-289.