Pharmacogenetics

Published on 16/03/2015 by admin

Filed under Basic Science

Last modified 16/03/2015

Print this page

rate 1 star rate 2 star rate 3 star rate 4 star rate 5 star
Your rating: none, Average: 4 (1 votes)

This article have been viewed 2005 times

CHAPTER 12 Pharmacogenetics

Definition

Some individuals can be especially sensitive to the effects of a particular drug, whereas others can be quite resistant. Such individual variation can be the result of factors that are not genetic. For example, both the young and the elderly are very sensitive to morphine and its derivatives, as are people with liver disease. Individual differences in response to drugs in humans are, however, often genetically determined.

The term pharmacogenetics was introduced by Vogel in 1959 for the study of genetically determined variations that are revealed solely by the effects of drugs. Pharmacogenetics is now used to describe the influence of genes on the efficacy and side effects of drugs. Pharmacogenomics describes the interaction between drugs and the genome (i.e., multiple genes), but the two terms are often used interchangeably. Pharmacogenetics/pharmacogenomics is important because adverse drug reactions are a major cause of morbidity and mortality. It is also likely to be of increasing importance in the future, particularly as a result of the development of new drugs from information that has become available from the Human Genome Project (see Chapter 5). The human genome influences the effects of drugs in at least three ways. Pharmacokinetics describes the metabolism of drugs, including the uptake of drugs, their conversion to active metabolites, and detoxification or breakdown. Pharmacodynamics refers to the interaction between drugs and their molecular targets. An example would be the binding of a drug to its receptor. The third way relates to palliative drugs that do not act directly on the cause of a disease, but rather on its symptoms. Analgesics, for example, do not influence the cause of pain but merely the perception of pain in the brain.

Drug Metabolism

The metabolism of a drug usually follows a common sequence of events (Figure 12.1). A drug is first absorbed from the gut, passes into the bloodstream, and becomes distributed and partitioned in the various tissues and tissue fluids. Only a small proportion of the total dose of a drug will be responsible for producing a specific pharmacological effect, most of it being broken down or excreted unchanged.

Kinetics of Drug Metabolism

The study of the metabolism and effects of a particular drug usually involves giving a standard dose of the drug and then, after a suitable time interval, determining the response, measuring the amount of the drug circulating in the blood or determining the rate at which it is metabolized. Such studies show that there is considerable variation in the way different individuals respond to certain drugs. This variability in response can be continuous or discontinuous.

If a dose–response test is carried out on a large number of subjects, their results can be plotted. A number of different possible responses can be seen (Figure 12.3). In continuous variation, the results form a bell-shaped or unimodal distribution. With discontinuous variation the curve is bimodal or sometimes even trimodal. A discontinuous response suggests that the metabolism of the drug is under monogenic control. For example, if the normal metabolism of a drug is controlled by a dominant gene, R, and if some people are unable to metabolize the drug because they are homozygous for a recessive gene, r, there will be three classes of individual: RR, Rr, and rr. If the responses of RR and Rr are indistinguishable, a bimodal distribution will result. If RR and Rr are distinguishable, a trimodal distribution will result, each peak or mode representing a different genotype. A unimodal distribution implies that the metabolism of the drug in question is under the control of many genes—i.e., is polygenic (p. 143).

Genetic Variations Revealed by the Effects of Drugs

Among the best known examples of drugs that have been responsible for revealing genetic variation in response are isoniazid, succinylcholine, primaquine, coumarin anticoagulants, certain anesthetic agents, the thiopurines, and debrisoquine.

N-Acetyltransferase Activity

Isoniazid is one of the drugs used in the treatment of tuberculosis. It is rapidly absorbed from the gut, resulting in an initial high blood level that is slowly reduced as the drug is inactivated and excreted. The metabolism of isoniazid allows two groups to be distinguished: rapid and slow inactivators. In the former, blood levels of the drug fall rapidly after an oral dose; in the latter, blood levels remain high for some time. Family studies have shown that slow inactivators of isoniazid are homozygous for an autosomal recessive allele of the liver enzyme N-acetyltransferase, with lower activity levels. N-acetyltransferase activity varies in different populations. In the United States and Western Europe, about 50% of the population are slow inactivators, in contrast to the Japanese, who are predominately rapid inactivators.

In some individuals, isoniazid can cause side effects such as polyneuritis, a systemic lupus erythematosus–like disorder, or liver damage. Blood levels of isoniazid remain higher for longer periods in slow inactivators than in rapid inactivators on equivalent doses. Slow inactivators have a significantly greater risk of developing side effects on doses that rapid inactivators require to ensure adequate blood levels for successful treatment of tuberculosis. Conversely, rapid inactivators have an increased risk of liver damage from isoniazid. Several other drugs are also metabolized by N-acetyltransferase, and therefore slow inactivators of isoniazid are also more likely to exhibit side effects. These drugs include hydralazine, which is an antihypertensive, and sulfasalazine, which is a sulfonamide derivative used to treat Crohn disease.

Studies in other animal species led to the cloning of the genes responsible for N-acetyltransferase activity in humans. This has revealed that there are three genes, one of which is not expressed and represents a pseudogene (NATP), one that does not exhibit differences in activity between individuals (NAT1), and a third (NAT2), mutations in which are responsible for the inherited polymorphic variation. These inherited variations in NAT2 have been reported to modify the risk of developing a number of cancers, including bladder, colorectal, breast, and lung cancer. This is thought to be through differences in acetylation of aromatic and heterocyclic amine carcinogens.