Pharmacogenetics

Published on 16/03/2015 by admin

Filed under Basic Science

Last modified 22/04/2025

Print this page

rate 1 star rate 2 star rate 3 star rate 4 star rate 5 star
Your rating: none, Average: 4 (1 votes)

This article have been viewed 2290 times

CHAPTER 12 Pharmacogenetics

Definition

Some individuals can be especially sensitive to the effects of a particular drug, whereas others can be quite resistant. Such individual variation can be the result of factors that are not genetic. For example, both the young and the elderly are very sensitive to morphine and its derivatives, as are people with liver disease. Individual differences in response to drugs in humans are, however, often genetically determined.

The term pharmacogenetics was introduced by Vogel in 1959 for the study of genetically determined variations that are revealed solely by the effects of drugs. Pharmacogenetics is now used to describe the influence of genes on the efficacy and side effects of drugs. Pharmacogenomics describes the interaction between drugs and the genome (i.e., multiple genes), but the two terms are often used interchangeably. Pharmacogenetics/pharmacogenomics is important because adverse drug reactions are a major cause of morbidity and mortality. It is also likely to be of increasing importance in the future, particularly as a result of the development of new drugs from information that has become available from the Human Genome Project (see Chapter 5). The human genome influences the effects of drugs in at least three ways. Pharmacokinetics describes the metabolism of drugs, including the uptake of drugs, their conversion to active metabolites, and detoxification or breakdown. Pharmacodynamics refers to the interaction between drugs and their molecular targets. An example would be the binding of a drug to its receptor. The third way relates to palliative drugs that do not act directly on the cause of a disease, but rather on its symptoms. Analgesics, for example, do not influence the cause of pain but merely the perception of pain in the brain.

Drug Metabolism

The metabolism of a drug usually follows a common sequence of events (Figure 12.1). A drug is first absorbed from the gut, passes into the bloodstream, and becomes distributed and partitioned in the various tissues and tissue fluids. Only a small proportion of the total dose of a drug will be responsible for producing a specific pharmacological effect, most of it being broken down or excreted unchanged.

Kinetics of Drug Metabolism

The study of the metabolism and effects of a particular drug usually involves giving a standard dose of the drug and then, after a suitable time interval, determining the response, measuring the amount of the drug circulating in the blood or determining the rate at which it is metabolized. Such studies show that there is considerable variation in the way different individuals respond to certain drugs. This variability in response can be continuous or discontinuous.

If a dose–response test is carried out on a large number of subjects, their results can be plotted. A number of different possible responses can be seen (Figure 12.3). In continuous variation, the results form a bell-shaped or unimodal distribution. With discontinuous variation the curve is bimodal or sometimes even trimodal. A discontinuous response suggests that the metabolism of the drug is under monogenic control. For example, if the normal metabolism of a drug is controlled by a dominant gene, R, and if some people are unable to metabolize the drug because they are homozygous for a recessive gene, r, there will be three classes of individual: RR, Rr, and rr. If the responses of RR and Rr are indistinguishable, a bimodal distribution will result. If RR and Rr are distinguishable, a trimodal distribution will result, each peak or mode representing a different genotype. A unimodal distribution implies that the metabolism of the drug in question is under the control of many genes—i.e., is polygenic (p. 143).

Genetic Variations Revealed by the Effects of Drugs

Among the best known examples of drugs that have been responsible for revealing genetic variation in response are isoniazid, succinylcholine, primaquine, coumarin anticoagulants, certain anesthetic agents, the thiopurines, and debrisoquine.

N-Acetyltransferase Activity

Isoniazid is one of the drugs used in the treatment of tuberculosis. It is rapidly absorbed from the gut, resulting in an initial high blood level that is slowly reduced as the drug is inactivated and excreted. The metabolism of isoniazid allows two groups to be distinguished: rapid and slow inactivators. In the former, blood levels of the drug fall rapidly after an oral dose; in the latter, blood levels remain high for some time. Family studies have shown that slow inactivators of isoniazid are homozygous for an autosomal recessive allele of the liver enzyme N-acetyltransferase, with lower activity levels. N-acetyltransferase activity varies in different populations. In the United States and Western Europe, about 50% of the population are slow inactivators, in contrast to the Japanese, who are predominately rapid inactivators.

In some individuals, isoniazid can cause side effects such as polyneuritis, a systemic lupus erythematosus–like disorder, or liver damage. Blood levels of isoniazid remain higher for longer periods in slow inactivators than in rapid inactivators on equivalent doses. Slow inactivators have a significantly greater risk of developing side effects on doses that rapid inactivators require to ensure adequate blood levels for successful treatment of tuberculosis. Conversely, rapid inactivators have an increased risk of liver damage from isoniazid. Several other drugs are also metabolized by N-acetyltransferase, and therefore slow inactivators of isoniazid are also more likely to exhibit side effects. These drugs include hydralazine, which is an antihypertensive, and sulfasalazine, which is a sulfonamide derivative used to treat Crohn disease.

Studies in other animal species led to the cloning of the genes responsible for N-acetyltransferase activity in humans. This has revealed that there are three genes, one of which is not expressed and represents a pseudogene (NATP), one that does not exhibit differences in activity between individuals (NAT1), and a third (NAT2), mutations in which are responsible for the inherited polymorphic variation. These inherited variations in NAT2 have been reported to modify the risk of developing a number of cancers, including bladder, colorectal, breast, and lung cancer. This is thought to be through differences in acetylation of aromatic and heterocyclic amine carcinogens.

Succinylcholine Sensitivity

Curare is a plant extract used in hunting by certain South American Indian tribes that produces profound muscular paralysis. Medically, curare is used in surgical operations because of the muscular relaxation it produces. Succinylcholine, also known as suxamethonium, is another drug that produces muscular relaxation, though by a different mechanism from curare. Suxamethonium has the advantage over curare that the relaxation of skeletal and respiratory muscles and the consequent apnea (cessation of breathing) it induces is only short-lived. Therefore it is used most often in the induction phase of anesthesia for intubation. The anesthetist, therefore, needs to maintain respiration by artificial means for only 2 to 3 minutes before it returns spontaneously. However, about one patient in every 2000 has a period of apnea that can last 1 hour or more after the use of suxamethonium. It was found that the apnea in such instances could be corrected by transfusion of blood or plasma from a normal person. When a suxamethonium-induced apnea occurs the anesthetist has to maintain respiration until the effects of the drug have worn off.

Succinylcholine is normally destroyed in the body by the plasma enzyme pseudocholinesterase. In patients who are highly sensitive to succinylcholine, the plasma pseudocholinesterase in their blood destroys the drug at a markedly slower rate than normal, or in some very rare cases is entirely deficient. Succinylcholine sensitivity is inherited as an autosomal recessive trait due to mutations of the CHE1 gene, and genetic testing may be offered to the relatives of a patient in whom a genetic predisposition has been identified.

Glucose 6-Phosphate Dehydrogenase Variants

For many years, quinine was the drug of choice in the treatment of malaria. Although it has been very effective in acute attacks, it is not effective in preventing relapses. In 1926 primaquine was introduced and proved to be much better than quinine in preventing relapses. However, it was not long after primaquine was introduced that some people were found to be sensitive to the drug. The drug could be taken for a few days with no apparent ill effects, and then suddenly some individuals would begin to pass very dark, often black, urine. Jaundice developed and the red cell count and hemoglobin concentration gradually fell as a consequence of hemolysis of the red blood cells. Affected individuals usually recovered from such a hemolytic episode, but occasionally the destruction of the red cells was extensive enough to be fatal. The cause of such cases of primaquine sensitivity was subsequently shown to be a deficiency in the red cell enzyme glucose 6-phosphate dehydrogenase (G6PD).

G6PD deficiency is inherited as an X-linked recessive trait (p. 114), rare in Caucasians but affecting about 10% of Afro-Caribbean males and relatively common in the Mediterranean. It is thought to be relatively common in these populations as a result of conferring increased resistance to the malarial parasite. These individuals are sensitive not only to primaquine, but also to many other compounds, including phenacetin, nitrofurantoin, and certain sulfonamides. G6PD deficiency is thought to be the first recognized pharmacogenetic disorder, having been described by Pythagoras around 500 bc.

Pharmacogenetics

Increased understanding of the influence of genes on the efficacy and side effects of drugs has led to the promise of personalized or individualized medicine, where the treatment for a particular disease is dependent on the individual’s genotype.

Maturity-Onset Diabetes of the Young

Maturity-onset diabetes of the young is a monogenic form of diabetes characterized by young age of onset (often before the age of 25 years), dominant inheritance and β-cell dysfunction (p. 236). Patients with mutations in the HNF1A or HNF4A genes are sensitive to sulfonylureas (Figure 12.4) and may experience episodes of hypoglycemia on standard doses. However, this sensitivity is advantageous at lower doses, and sulfonylureas are the recommended oral treatment in this genetic subgroup.

Neonatal Diabetes

The most frequent cause of permanent neonatal diabetes is an activating mutation in the KCNJ11 or ABCC8 genes, which encode the Kir6.2 and SUR1 subunits of the ATP-sensitive potassium (K-ATP) channel in the pancreatic β cell (p. 236). The effect of such mutations is to prevent K-ATP channel closure by reducing the response to ATP. Because channel closure is the trigger for insulin secretion, these mutations result in diabetes. Defining the genetic etiology for this rare subtype of diabetes has led to improved treatment, because the majority of patients can be treated successfully with sulfonylurea tablets instead of insulin. These drugs bind to the sulfonylurea receptor subunits of the K-ATP channel to cause closure independently of ATP, thereby triggering insulin secretion (Figure 12.5). High-dose sulfonylurea therapy results in improved glycemic control with fewer hypoglycemic episodes and, for some patients, an Hb A1c level (this is a measure of glycemic control) within the normal range.

Pharmacogenomics

Pharmacogenomics is defined as the study of the interaction of an individual’s genetic makeup and response to a drug. The key distinction between pharmacogenetics and pharmacogenomics is that the former describes the study of variability in drug responses attributed to individual genes and the latter describes the study of the entire genome related to drug response. The expectation is that inherited variation at the DNA level results in functional variation in the gene products that play an essential role in determining the variability in responses, both therapeutic and adverse, to a drug. If polymorphic DNA sequence variation occurs in the coding portion or regulatory regions of genes, it is likely to result in variation in the gene product through alteration of function, activity, or level of expression. Automated analysis of genome-wide single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) (p. 67) allows the possibility of identifying genes involved in drug metabolism, transport and receptors that are likely to play a role in determining the variability in efficacy, side effects and toxicity of a drug.

The availability of whole-genome SNP maps will enable an SNP profile to be created for patients who experience adverse events or who respond clinically to the drug (efficacy). An individual’s whole-genome SNP type has been described as an ‘SNP print’. However, this raises issues pertaining to the disclosure of information of uncertain significance that is later shown to be associated with an adverse outcome unrelated to the reason for the original test. An example is apolipoprotein E (ApoE) genotyping, where ApoE ε4 was first reported to be associated with variation in cholesterol levels but later with age of onset of Alzheimer disease.

Efficacy

There is no doubt that the cost-effectiveness of drugs is improved if they are prescribed only to those patients likely to respond to them. Several drugs developed for the treatment of various cancers have different efficacy depending on the molecular biology of the tumour (see Table 12.1). For example, herceptin (trastuzumab) is an antibody that targets overexpression of HER2/neu protein observed in approximately one-third of patients with breast cancer. Consequently, patients are prescribed herceptin only if their tumor has been shown to overexpress HER2/neu.

Table 12.1 Examples of Drugs Effective for the Treatment of Specific Cancers

Type of Cancer Characteristic Drug
Breast HER2 overexpression Herceptin (trastuzumab)
Chronic myeloid leukemia t(9;22) BCR-ABL fusion Gleevec (imatinib)
Non–small-cell lung cancer EGFR activating mutation Iressa (gefitinib) or Tarceva (erlotinib)
Gastrointestinal stromal tumour KIT or PDGFRA activating mutation Gleevec (imatinib)

Gleevec (imatinib) is a protein tyrosine kinase inhibitor that has been used to treat chronic myeloid leukemia since 2001. It is a very effective treatment that works by binding the BCR-ABL fusion protein resulting from the t(9;22) translocation. This is an example of effective drug design resulting from knowledge of the molecular etiology. More recently it has been also shown to be effective in the treatment of gastrointestinal stromal tumours that harbour KIT mutations.

Approximately 13% of patients with non–small-cell lung cancer have an activating EGFR mutation. These mutations increase the activity of the epidermal growth factor receptor tyrosine kinase domain so that the receptor is constitutionally active in the absence of epidermal growth factor. This leads to increased proliferation, angiogenesis and metastasis. Drugs designed to block the EGFR tyrosine kinase domain and inhibit these effects have been developed. Patients with lung tumours harbouring an activating EGFR mutation can show a dramatic response to treatment with these drugs (gefitinib and erlotinib) as shown in Figure 12.6.

image image

FIGURE 12.6 Example of the response to gefitinib in a patient with non–small-cell lung cancer and an activating EGFR mutation. A computed tomographic scan of the chest shows a large mass in the right lung before treatment (A) and marked improvement 6 weeks after gefitinib was initiated (B).

(Reproduced with permission from Lynch TJ, Bell DW, Sordella R, et al 2004 Activating mutations in the epidermal growth factor receptor underlying responsiveness of non-small-cell lung cancer to gefitinib. N Engl J Med 350(21):2129–2139.)

Genetic profiling is a step toward personalized medicine. This information can be used to select the appropriate treatment at the correct dosage and to avoid adverse drug reactions.

Further Reading

Beutler E. Glucose-6-phosphate dehydrogenase deficiency. N Engl J Med. 1991;324:169-174.

Review of an important ethnic pharmacogenetic polymorphism.

Goldstein DB, Tate SK, Sisodiya SM. Pharmacogenetics goes genomic. Nature Genet Rev. 2003;4:937-947.

Review of pharmacogenetics/genomics.

Neumann DA, Kimmel CA. Human variability in response in chemical exposures: measures, modelling, and risk assessment. London: CRC Press; 1998.

A detailed discussion of the inherited human variability to exposure to the toxic effects of environmental chemicals.

Newman W, Payne K. Removing barriers to a clinical pharmacogenetics service. Personalized Med. 2008;5:471-480.

A review article describing the application of pharmacogenetics to current clinical practice.

Pearson ER, Flechtner I, Njolstad PR, et al. Switching from insulin to oral sulfonylureas in patients with diabetes due to Kir6.2 mutations. Neonatal Diabetes International Collaborative Group. N Engl J Med. 2006;355:467-477.

Pharmacogenetic treatment of monogenic diabetes.

Roses AD. Pharmacogenetics in drug discovery and development: a translational perspective. Nat Rev Drug Discovery. 2008;7:807-817.

A recent article describing the role of pharmacogenetics in drug development.

Vogel F, Buselmaier W, Reichert W, Kellerman G, Berg P, editors. Human genetic variation in response to medical and environmental agents: pharmacogenetics and ecogenetics. Berlin: Springer, 1978.

One of the early definitive outlines of the field of pharmacogenetics.

Elements