Peripheral neuropathies I: Clinical approach and investigations

Published on 10/04/2015 by admin

Filed under Neurology

Last modified 22/04/2025

Print this page

rate 1 star rate 2 star rate 3 star rate 4 star rate 5 star
Your rating: none, Average: 0 (0 votes)

This article have been viewed 1634 times

Peripheral neuropathies I

Clinical approach and investigations

Peripheral neuropathies are very variable, both in their clinical manifestations and in their aetiology (Table 1). These three sections give an overview of peripheral nerve disease, with the third concentrating on the common isolated peripheral nerve lesions.

Pathology

Peripheral nerves can be affected in three ways (Fig. 1). These mechanisms of injury are not mutually exclusive and in some conditions there are contributions from all three mechanisms:

Clinical features

Peripheral neuropathies can be sensory or motor, though usually there is a combination with one predominant. The clinical features depend on the underlying pathological process and the speed of onset. Axonal neuropathies result in wasting of muscles with loss of distal tendon reflexes. Demyelinating neuropathies are not associated with muscle wasting, but usually there is areflexia. In some types of neuropathy, the autonomic nervous system can also be affected.

There are four patterns of clinical presentation of peripheral nerve disease (Fig. 2):

The speed of onset can be divided into acute, less than 4 weeks, subacute, developing over 1–6 months, and chronic, developing over 6 months. This is useful in the diagnosis of aetiology.

Diagnosis and differential diagnosis

The diagnosis of a peripheral neuropathy falls into two parts.

Investigations

The investigations will be directed by the clinical presentation. Nerve conduction studies are essential in understanding the pattern of the neuropathy. Ancillary investigations are directed at establishing associations with the syndrome or finding the aetiology.

In a patient with an acute demyelinating neuropathy, finding an acellular CSF with raised protein is further corroboration of the diagnosis of Guillain–Barré syndrome.

A patient with an axonal distal sensorimotor neuropathy without a clinical indicator of aetiology will need a screen of investigations to look for systemic and deficiency states (Box 1).

The diagnosis of certain inherited neuropathies can now be made by finding the appropriate genetic abnormality using molecular genetics (see below). In other patients in whom there is apparently no family history of neuropathy, a diagnosis can be made by examining the patient’s relatives and finding other affected members.

A patient with possible vasculitic neuropathy may need a nerve biopsy if the diagnosis cannot be reached by other means. Nerve biopsy may also be helpful in patients with sarcoidosis, amyloidosis or a disabling neuropathy where the diagnosis has not been made despite extensive investigations.

Formal autonomic function tests may be helpful. Autonomic involvement is prominent in diabetic and amyloid neuropathies, rare inherited neuropathies and Guillain–Barré syndrome.