Periareolar Benelli mastopexy and reduction: The “Round Block”

Published on 22/05/2015 by admin

Filed under Plastic Reconstructive Surgery

Last modified 22/04/2025

Print this page

rate 1 star rate 2 star rate 3 star rate 4 star rate 5 star
Your rating: none, Average: 5 (1 votes)

This article have been viewed 8865 times

CHAPTER 51 Periareolar Benelli mastopexy and reduction: The “Round Block”

History

The periareolar approach enables us to perform many breast operations, from mastopexy to reduction or augmentation, and also the excision of breast lesions.

The “round block” enables use of the periareolar approach to be extended to numerous types of breast surgery, giving easy access to all the glandular areas by extending the incision in an ellipse of depithelialized periareolar skin.

By performing a mastopexy, the main goal is to obtain an attractive breast shape with a lasting result, leaving the most inconspicuous scar. The shortest scar is confined to the periareolar circle, avoiding a vertical infra-areolar scar and a horizontal submammary scar.

However, the indications for the various periareolar plasty techniques have been limited.16 Only moderate cases of small breast ptosis have been treated using periareolar mastopexy, owing to the risk of enlargement and distortion caused by tension on the areola. The round block technique helps to eliminate this complication, and makes it possible to treat many cases of breast ptosis and hypertrophy by periareolar mastopexy.7,8

One of the principal elements of our technique is to treat ptosis and hypertrophy by using a blocked circular dermal suture passed in a purse-string fashion. The round block constitutes a cerclage, fixing a solid circular dermodermal scar block around the areola (Figs 51.1 and 51.2).

The concept of the periareolar round block technique is totally different from the concept of the traditional T-inverted or vertical technique, in which the skin tension on the scars gives conical shape to the breast.

On the other hand, in the periareolar round block technique, it is necessary to avoid tension on the periareolar skin, because the breast shape is not provided by cutaneous tension but by the internal shaping of the gland separated from the skin, or by an implant if volume augmentation is necessary.

To obtain an attractive breast shape, it is necessary to separate the work on the gland (creating the conical shape) from the work on the skin (removing the excess skin around the areola). The skin must cover the new conical shape without any tension. Excess tension on the skin will flatten the shape and cause healing problems.

The aim of the round block is not to create periareolar skin tension, but to drape an even distribution of the breast skin around the periareolar circle covering the glandular breast cone without tension.

To achieve the greatest anterior projection of the breast, we perform a criss-cross T-inverted technique on the gland, which provides good coning and support without cutting the skin.

The scars are less important for a mature woman, but might have negative consequences for a young woman in whom scars are sometimes hypertrophic.

When mammaplasties are performed, the efforts to limit the scar to the periareolar circle are motivated by the fact that periareolar healing generally produces an inconspicuous scar, even though the skin near the inframammary crease has much more potential to develop hypertrophic scarring, especially in the parasternal area.

Evolution of personal technique

In 1983, we started performing periareolar mastopexy with dermal cerclage of the areola via a purse-string suture in order to prevent postoperative enlargement of the areola and the scar. In view of this procedure’s effectiveness, we extended its application, calling it the “round block” because of the solidity of the dermodermal circular scar block reinforced by the cerclage, with a non-resorbable suture passed in a purse-string manner through the edge of the periareolar dermis. By using the round block, our efforts initially enabled reduction of the length of the horizontal scar, and subsequently, to totally eliminate the horizontal scar, going from a T-inverted technique to a vertical technique.7,8 Finally, it was possible to eliminate the vertical scar with the periareolar technique.

This procedure has enabled us to treat more serious cases of ptosis and thereby extend the indications of periareolar mastopexy that in the past had been reserved only for moderate ptosis or hypertrophy, essentially because of the postoperative risk of enlargement of the areola and periareolar scar.

Our use of the round block technique has progressed with prudence. In the beginning, we obtained the best results in the correction of hypotrophic ptosis by using periareolar mastopexy with round block and simultaneous placing of a breast implant, ensuring the shape and the anterior projection of the breast.

To obtain breast coning in the treatment of simple ptosis and hypertrophy, simple plication and invagination of the base of the breast has yielded satisfactory results for small breasts, but unsatisfactory results for larger breasts, with some leading to long-term shape flattening and recurrence of ptosis.

Therefore, we applied the techniques classically used for reduction mammaplasty in an inverted-T, but practiced them only on the mammary gland without cutting the skin. This was then redraped around the areola without tension, using a round block on the skin aperture. The breast was then reduced and reshaped in the manner of an internal inverted-T to the glandular parenchyma alone.

The inverted-T techniques that give maximum coning and the best long-term hold are those that are characterized by crossing and overlapping of two flaps (lateral and medial), which ensure a maximum of anterior projection to the areola.9,10

Concerning work on the gland itself, our goal has been to limit its detachment as much as possible in order to maximize the vitality of the glandular flaps and to ensure the conical shape. Concerning the skin, the trend has been to limit the amount of resection of the ellipse of the periareolar depithelialization, to prevent complications such as bad scarring and flattening of the breast owing to excess tension in the periareolar area.

Anatomy

On the breast we distinguish between the thin, elastic periareolar skin whose function is to adapt itself to the breast volume changes and which generally produces fine scars and is easily stretched by the weight of the gland, and the skin of the base of the breast and of the submammary fold. This thick skin’s function is to support the breast, and the scars it produces are potentially much larger.

For support of the breast, the periareolar technique is used to remove the thin, elastic stretched skin around the areola, which does not have any supportive value, and to conserve the thick skin at the base of the breast and submammary fold.

Vascularization and innervation of the areola and mammary gland are addressed in the same manner as for an inverted-T technique, with a vertical dermoglandular flap supporting the areola with a superior pedicle. This pedicle will be larger because it occupies the whole width of the ellipse, whereas in the design of an inverted-T mammaplasty the pedicle will be narrower, passing through the edge of the areola, where a straight liberation of the adjacent tissue is required to allow the lift. For this reason, the vitality, breast-feeding ability, and innervation of the areola seems to be better preserved by the round block technique.

Subdermal vascularization is preserved with skin excision done with scissors close to the gland. At the time of the dermal incision within the de-epithelialized ellipse, we conserve a 1 cm strip of dermis in order to protect the vascularity of the ellipse’s skin edge, especially in its lower part (see Fig. 51.5).

The entire operation thus preserves the blood supply and innervation of the breast. This advantage is essential for the improved control of the scar and vitality of the tissues constituting the remodeled breast.

Physical evaluation

Technical steps

Step 1: Planning and marking

We have no standard pattern. Each one is specific to the individual patient. The marking begins with the patient standing, then lying supine, and finally back in the standing position.

Marking in the standing position

The midline is marked to maintain symmetry. The breast meridian is marked at the beginning on the clavicle, 6 cm from the midline. The meridian is not the meridian of the ptotic breast, but the meridian of the manually reshaped breast. This new meridian will not necessarily cross the ptotic nipple, because the mammary ptosis is generally a lateralization of the breast due to chest wall convexity (Fig. 51.3).

The new meridian is often more medial than the one in the ptotic breast. The lower part of the breast meridian is not marked while the patient is standing, but while she is lying supine.

Marking the patient who is lying supine

The lower part of the marking is done with the patient lying supine, with the arms lying symmetrically at the patient’s sides.

Leaving an ample distance BS has two advantages

Covering the glandular cone without skin tension prevents flattening of the breast shape, allowing the skin to retract in a more natural adaptation to the height of the new glandular cone obtained by internal shaping of the gland. Reducing the size of the excised skin better facilitates skin adaptation to the areola final size during periareolar skin suturing.

Points C and D are the lateral and medial limits of the ellipse, respectively. These points are marked symmetrically, regarding the breast meridian as a guide and aiming to mark the minimal size of the ellipse because ample skin is needed to cover, without tension, the new glandular cone, lifted and projected earlier. For this reason, point C, lateral limit of the ellipse, is usually near the lateral border of the areola (Fig. 51.3).

The medial limit of the ellipse (point D) is symmetrical to point C, using the breast meridian as a guide, and located 8 to 12 cm from the midline following the width of the chest wall, the breast implantation, and the breast volume to cover. The medial border of the contralateral ellipse is marked symmetrically referring to the midline.

Checking the markings is done by pinching together A and B, then C and D, in order to verify that the remaining skin will be adequate to cover the glandular cone without tension. Finally, the ellipse is marked with a dotted line that joins points A, B, C, and D. At this point, the ellipse shape should be almost round when the patient is lying supine.

A final check of the ellipse design is done with the patient standing. The gravity gives a vertical shape to the ellipse. The surgeon should check the symmetry and note and photograph the measurement of the marking.

Step 3: Incision and dissection

De-epithelialization of the periareolar ellipse is performed by pulling on a concentric epidermal flap (Fig. 51.4). The areola is marked with a tube on the tensed skin at 1.5 cm diameter more than the desired final diameter to compensate for a stretching and retracting afterwards. It is usually cut at 5.5 cm to close at 4 cm.

An incision on the de-epithelialized dermis is made from 2 to 10 o’clock, at 1 cm inside the skin edge, to improve the subdermal vascular support of the epidermal edge.

Subcutaneous dissection is performed with consideration for the blood supply to the skin. Dissection extends from the ellipse to the submammary fold limits (Fig. 51.5).

At this stage, the surgeon incises the gland in order to constitute the dermoglandular flap that will be supporting the areola. This incision does not extend to the edge of the dermis, because it is often too near the areola, especially on the lateral side.

The glandular incision is semi-circular at 3 cm from the inferior areola’s edge in order to preserve innervation and blood supply to the areola. This incision facilitates opening the prepectoral space, which we dissect only in the avascular central space, preserving the peripheral blood supply, where the breast is more adherent to the fascia and where the perforators are located. The inferior glandular flap is then elevated between two clamps and cut vertically beyond the breast meridian up to the fascia.

As a result of this dissection, four flaps will have been created (Fig. 51.6):

Work on the glandular flaps will facilitate a reduction in volume, if necessary, and will reshape the breast by fixation of the flaps in a new position, forming a glandular cone on which the skin will be redraped with the round block closing.

Step 5: Glandular modeling

Depending on the anatomy of each patient, the glandular flaps are situated to achieve an attractive shape with minimal detachment, to prevent fat necrosis.

The glandular flaps are assembled in order to reduce the base of the breast, providing a conical shape and the best long-term support. The criss-cross mastopexy often works well to accomplish these goals.

We begin reducing the upper base of the breast using a plication, closing the keel-like reduction with a stitch.

The lower base of the breast is reduced by crossing the two lower glandular flaps (lateral and medial). The flap that is crossed over the other has the biggest amplitude of translation. Because ptosis involves a sagging of the breast, but also generally a lateralization of it, we generally prefer crossing the lateral flap over the medial one to medialize the breast shape. In the rare cases in which we desire to lateralize the breast, we cross the medial flap over the lateral one.

In most cases, we begin the criss-cross mastopexy by rotating and folding the medial flap behind the areola, fixing its distal part to the pectoralis muscle using a U-point (Fig. 51.7). The lateral flap is crossed over and fixed to the medial flap by additional U-points (Fig. 51.8). These glandular stitches do not squeeze the glandular tissue, thus avoiding glandular cyto-steatonecrosis. Moving the flaps reduces the base of the breast and creates a glandular cone on which we place the areola.

Step 7: The full breast lacing

Optimally, the glandular cone will be well-shaped, with the areola at the top of the cone. The quality of the tissue determines whether this result can be maintained long term. To provide the best support of the shape, we prefer to use full breast lacing of braided polyester Mersilene 2-0, applied with a long straight needle (Fig. 51.10). This type of lacing is useful in case of poor-quality glandular tissue, especially in patients with adipose involution.

The lacing is created by some large inverted stitches, with moderate tension traversing the entire thickness of the breast diameter to maintain the crossing of the glandular flaps. The lacing, at its superior part, also passes through the areola dermoglandular flap. This passage allows control of the anterior projection of the nipple–areola complex and prevents any protrusion of it. It is important that these full breast lacing stitches be applied without tension to avoid strangulating the gland and creating fat necrosis. The role of the full breast lacing is to provide passive support of the conical shape obtained by the superficial stitches of the glandular modeling (see Step 5).

Step 8: Round block cerclage stitch

The detached skin is redraped on the glandular cone, and complementary detachment may be necessary to free some skin in order to obtain an easy elevation and even distribution of the skin all around the areola.

Round block cerclage stitch can be placed in two ways: outside the ellipse or inside the ellipse.

Round block inside of the ellipse

The round block cerclage stitch, again a Mersilene 2-0, is passed with a curved needle like a purse-string going alternatively in and out of the dermis at 2 mm from the edge of the de-epidermized area inside of the ellipse (Fig. 51.12).

Pulling on the suture elevates all the detached skin around the areola; a sliding of the skin on the stitch allows an even distribution of the pleats. To close with symmetry of the areola diameters, we measure the diameter with a rule, or we can also use a tube of the desired diameter which is inserted and the suture tied onto it (Fig. 51.13). The knot is buried behind the skin through the dermal window. We prefer a braided polyester suture like the Mersilene 2-0 because the scar penetrates the fiber of the stitch, avoiding a sliding of the skin on the suture when moving the breast. Before the skin closure, we improve the distribution of the pleats around the areola. We avoid accumulation of some deep pleats in one area; instead, we try to have more numerous superficial pleats distributed on all the circumference of the areola. This is more a compression than a plication of the skin excess. The round block allows the elevation and the even distribution of the skin flap over the new glandular cone (Fig. 51.14).

Step 10: Regulation of areola projection

The coning of the gland gives a strong anterior projection to the nipple–areola complex, sometimes generating its protrusion.

We propose some specific sutures to control the anterior projection of the nipple–areola complex:

The full breast lacing transareolar first stitch (Fig. 51.10) is the first control of the nipple–areola complex anterior projection, performed after glandular modeling (Step 7).

Inverted dermoareolar stitches take a large vertical grip in the areola’s thickness and a horizontal grip in the edge of the dermal ellipse. The location of these stitches is also useful for an even distribution of the skin excess (as in cardinal stitches) (Fig. 51.16).

Diametrical transareolar U points are passed with 2-0 braided polyester using a straight needle. In order to cover the knot, the suture begins and finishes buried behind the areola (Fig. 51.17). This U point is also useful to give a circular shape to the areola; in some cases the areola tends to take on an oval form. This diametrical U point is put in place at the greatest diameter of the oval areola. A little tension on the stitch gives a circular shape to the areola.

The second internal dermoareolar round block suture described in Step 9 is also very useful to control the nipple–areola complex projection.

All these types of stitches and sutures allow control of the size, shape, and projection of the nipple–areola complex.

Step 12: The dressing and postoperative care

The first dressing is a wet compress on the areola and dry compresses on the detached skin. These are maintained with an adhesive bandage of moderate compression to prevent hematoma formation. Vacuum drainage exits below the axilla.

The day after or the second day after surgery following the volume of drainage, the vacuum drainage is removed and the patient leaves the clinic. One week after, at the office, we remove all the dressing and clean the skin with antiseptic solution and later with ether to facilitate the adhesion of an adhesive pad. This is a sterile, ultra-thin, highly conformable, semiocclusive polyurethane foam adhesive pad. This dressing covers the areola and scar and maintains the detached skin. The patient leaves the clinic wearing a simple brassiere that maintains the breast and the adhesive pad.

The adhesive polyurethane foam pad has many advantages:

The patient must wear a brassiere night and day for 2 months.

Complications

The same complications as those occasioned by the traditional mammaplasty (Table 51.2) are apparent. Cutaneoglandular detachment eases the problems of cutaneous necrosis and glandular cytosteatonecrosis. To avoid those complications, some precautionary measures must be observed.

Table 51.2 Complications in 528 cases

Hematoma 9 1.7%
Seroma 4 0.8%
Infection 3 0.6%
Cytosteatonecrosic cysts 10 1.9%
Areola necrosis 0
Areola sensitivity loss 0
Skin flap partial necrosis 6 1.1%
Hypertrophic scar 2 0.4%

For a good glandular vascularization

The first assembling stitches of the criss-cross mastopexy should be superficial to avoid strangulation of the flaps. The full breast lacing stitches extend through the thickness of the reshaped glandular cone and are set without any tension. Their only role is one of passive contention of the mammary cone.

One case of infection involved a 16-year-old girl with thoracic acne. She had taken hot baths with her dressings and had kept them wet, not changing them for the whole week after surgery. The result was a sudden worsening of the acne underneath the wet dressings, in addition to staphylococcal cellulitis of each breast. The infected tissues then needed to be surgically cleaned. After spontaneous healing, she again underwent surgery, but this time with the T-inverted technique, which yielded a satisfactory result.

Two other cases of infection involved a severe polycystic mastosis and cytosteatonecrosis of the glandular flaps owing to tight, strangulating glandular stitches on a fatty breast and adipose involution, respectively. In these two cases, the healing was delayed but was finally satisfactory. Scar revision was undertaken using local anesthesia, but the scar remained periareolar.

Use of the round block for mastopexy and breast augmentation

In the association of breast augmentation and periareolar mastopexy, the breast shape will be provided by the implant support and will help to maintain a long-term good anterior projection. We mainly use a retropectoral position. The release of the inferior attachment of the pectoral muscle allows a superior retraction of the muscle raising the breast parenchyma attached to it.11

The choice of the location of the incision in the de-epithelialized ellipse depends on many factors: the ellipse gives space for a wide incision superior, inferior or lateral to the areola. That allows good vision and large access for the pocket dissection.

The shape given by the implant generally allows minimal glandular shaping, avoiding weak cover of the breast implant in the lower pole in which the pectoral muscle is not present.

After closing the round block on the reshaped breast by the breast implant, the areola is frequently strongly protruding due to the internal pressure through the round block. To control this protrusion, the sutures described in Step 10 are very helpful used separately or in association.

Pearls & pitfalls