Pediatric Overdoses

Published on 14/03/2015 by admin

Filed under Emergency Medicine

Last modified 22/04/2025

Print this page

rate 1 star rate 2 star rate 3 star rate 4 star rate 5 star
Your rating: none, Average: 0 (0 votes)

This article have been viewed 3008 times

158 Pediatric Overdoses

Pathophysiology

Over-the-Counter Agents

Camphor

Camphor is an aromatic terpene ketone, originally distilled from the bark of the camphor tree and now synthesized from turpentine oil. It is a common ingredient in some topical and vaporized medications intended to treat musculoskeletal pain or symptoms of common flu-like illnesses (Table 158.1). Camphor is marketed as an analgesic, an antipruritic, and an antitussive, and it is also found in older formulations of mothballs.

Table 158.1 Common Camphor-Containing Products

PRODUCT CAMPHOR CONTENT (%)
Camphorated oil 20.0
Campho-Phenique 10.8
Camphor spirits 10.0
Vicks VapoRub 4.8
Heet 3.60
Tiger Balm 11%

The exact mechanism by which camphor produces toxicity is unknown, although the cyclic ketone of its hydroaromatic terpene group is hypothesized to be a neurotoxin. Camphor is highly lipophilic, resulting in rapid movement across cell membranes and a large volume of distribution. Its metabolites are stored in fat deposits and are cleared over a prolonged period of time, which may be responsible for the delayed onset of seizures associated with camphor toxicity.2 Camphor may also cause gastrointestinal toxicity from its direct effect on mucosal surfaces.

Doses between 750 and 1500 mg, and doses as low as 500 mg in some case reports, are associated with seizures and death.2 For this reason, the U.S. Food and Drug Administration ruled in 1982 that products could not contain more than 11% camphor. However, some commercially available formulations contain 500 mg in 1 teaspoonful of product. In addition, a case series of pediatric seizures attributed to camphor toxicity highlights the role that camphor still plays in some ethnic and cultural practices. Illegally sold, high-concentration camphor products pose a risk in these populations.3

Salicylates

Salicylates are present in numerous over-the-counter products and are marketed as analgesics, antipyretics, and antiinflammatory agents (Table 158.2). Several Asian herbal remedies sold as topical treatments for musculoskeletal pain also contain salicylates.

Table 158.2 Common Salicylate-Containing Products

PRODUCT ACTIVE COMPONENT CONTENT
Alka-Seltzer Plus Acetylsalicylic acid 325 mg/tablet
Ben Gay Arthritis Formula Methylsalicylate 30%
Clearasil Ultra Acne Scrub Salicylic acid 2%
Heet Methylsalicylate 18%
Oil of wintergreen Methylsalicylate 98%
Pepto-Bismol Bismuth subsalicylate 262 mg/15 mL
Sebulex Dandruff Shampoo Salicylic acid 2%

Oil of wintergreen represents a specific concern in the pediatric population because of its extremely high concentration. One teaspoon of 98% oil of wintergreen contains 7000 mg of methylsalicylate, equivalent to 86 baby aspirin, a potentially lethal dose for children weighing less than 23 kg. This product has a pleasing aroma, thus rendering it particularly vulnerable to accidental ingestion. A review of pediatric salicylate poisonings found that all published cases of life-threatening toxicity or death resulted from oil of wintergreen or Asian herbal oil ingestions.4

Salicylate toxicity is caused both by direct stimulation of the central nervous system (CNS) respiratory center, resulting in hyperventilation and respiratory alkalosis, and by uncoupling of oxidative phosphorylation, which results in anion gap metabolic acidosis. Pulmonary and cerebral edema is hypothesized to result from increased capillary permeability. Impaired glucose metabolism can lead to hyperglycemia or hypoglycemia. Doses greater than 150 mg/kg are potentially toxic in children, and serious toxicity is seen in the range of 300 to 500 mg/kg.

Topical Anesthetics

Topical anesthetics are found in various pain-relieving products ranging from teething gels to hemorrhoid creams (Table 158.3). Amide anesthetics, which include lidocaine and dibucaine, work by blocking voltage-gated sodium channels and preventing action potential propagation. In toxic doses, these agents can cause CNS hyperstimulation secondary to central blocking of inhibitory pathways that can progress to seizures, respiratory depression, and coma. Amides can also cause cardiac toxicity because of their antiarrhythmic properties, but this is most frequently seen in intravenous, rather than oral, exposures.5

Table 158.3 Common Anesthetic-Containing Products

PRODUCT CONTENT
Anbesol Maximum Strength Benzocaine, 20.0%
Baby Orajel Benzocaine, 7.5%
Baby Anbesol Gel Benzocaine, 7.5%
EMLA Cream 25 g each of lidocaine and prilocaine/1 g
Vagisil Cream Benzocaine, 5%

Benzocaine is an ester anesthetic whose metabolites can cause methemoglobinemia in toxic doses. Methemoglobin is formed by oxidation of iron from the ferrous (Fe2+) to the ferric (Fe3+) state within the hemoglobin molecule. This process causes a leftward shift in the hemoglobin-oxygen dissociation curve and decreases hemoglobin’s oxygen carrying capacity. Patients less than 6 months old have a relative deficiency of methemoglobin reductase and may be more susceptible to toxicity.5

Prilocaine is an amide compound that has been shown to cause methemoglobinemia as its primary toxicity in overdose.5 Both prilocaine and lidocaine are components in EMLA cream, so this particular cream can cause either CNS toxicity or methemoglobinemia in overdose.

A literature review found published cases of seizures resulting after single ingestions of 5 to 25 mL of viscous lidocaine by children 2 years of age or younger.5 Although dibucaine is less commonly prescribed than lidocaine, it is 10 times more potent, and ingestion of 2 to 3 teaspoons has caused death secondary to cardiopulmonary arrest.6 Published reports of benzocaine-induced toxicity vary; cyanosis secondary to methemoglobinemia may result from oral doses in the range of 15 to 40 mg/kg, although the development of methemoglobinemia may be idiosyncratic, rather than dose related.

Caustics

Many household products are caustic agents and can cause significant toxicity with small exposures. Caustic agents are classified as alkaline or acid corrosives, depending on their pH (Table 158.4). Passed in 1970, the Federal Hazardous Substances Act and the Poison Prevention Packaging Act stated that caustic agents with a concentration higher than 10% must be placed in child-resistant containers. By 1973, the household product concentration limit had been lowered to 2%.

Table 158.4 Household Caustic Agents

PRODUCT CAUSTIC INGREDIENT(S)
Alkaline Corrosives  
Drain cleaners Sodium hydroxide (lye)
Oven cleaners Sodium hydroxide
Hair relaxers Sodium hydroxide
Automatic dishwasher detergents Sodium tripolyphosphate
Sodium metasilicate
Household ammonia cleaning solutions (glass cleaners, antirust products, floor strippers, toilet bowl cleaners, wax removers) Ammonium hydroxide
Acidic Corrosives  
Drain cleaners Sulfuric acid
Rust removers Hydrofluoric acid
Oxalic acid
Toilet bowl cleaners Hydrochloric acid
Sulfuric acid
Phosphoric acid
Tire cleaning agent Ammonium bifluoride

Alkaline corrosives cause liquefaction necrosis, which is characterized by protein dissolution, collagen destruction, fat saponification, cell membrane emulsification, and cell death. Damage continues after surface exposure because of the ability of alkaline corrosives to penetrate tissue. In contrast, acids cause coagulation necrosis, which leads to desiccation of epithelial cells and produces eschar, with resulting edema, erythema, mucosal sloughing, ulceration, and necrosis of the surface tissues.

The dose of a caustic agent causing significant toxicity varies by product and concentration. Information on specific agents can be obtained from product packaging and from a poison control center.

Calcium Channel Blockers

Calcium channel blockers are widely prescribed for their chronotropic and antihypertensive effects. They exert their action through L-type voltage-gated channels present in cardiac myocytes, vascular smooth muscle, and the sinoatrial and atrioventricular nodes. The three main classes of calcium channel blockers are the phenylalkylamines, the benzothiaprines, and the dihydropyridines. The phenylalkylamines (verapamil) and the benzothiaprines (diltiazem) act predominantly on myocytes and cardiac tissue, and the dihydropyridines (nifedipine) work predominantly on vascular tissue. Bepridil, the sole agent representing a fourth class, is not in widespread use because of its poor side effect profile.

Calcium channel blocker overdose causes severe hypotension and bradycardia, although reflex tachycardia may also be seen in overdose of the vascular tone–predominant dihydropyridines. Calcium channel blockade is responsible for dysrhythmias ranging from heart block to idioventricular arrhythmias. Impaired insulin release and systemic insulin resistance lead to the classic finding of hyperglycemia. Pulmonary edema may occur; the mechanism is unknown, but the edema may be caused by selective precapillary vasodilation or aggressive fluid resuscitation.8

Data on the minimum dose required to produce significant toxicity in children are mixed, but published cases have reported that one to two pills caused significant morbidity or death in children less than 6 years of age.9

Calcium channel blocker overdose and beta-blocker overdose are commonly discussed together in the adult literature because of their similarity of presentation and the therapeutic coadministration of these medications. A review of the pediatric literature found no published cases of death in young children as a result of accidental ingestion of beta-blockers, so these agents do not appear on the “One Pill Can Kill” list.10

Clonidine and Topical Imidazolines

Clonidine is a centrally acting α-receptor agonist that inhibits sympathetic pathways. It was developed in the 1960s as a nasal decongestant, but it is most commonly used as an antihypertensive and in the treatment of narcotic and alcohol withdrawal, of perimenopausal hot flashes, and, more recently, in the treatment of pediatric attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder and Tourette disorder. Topical imidazolines are found in over-the counter decongestants for the nose and eyes, including oxymetazoline (Afrin), naphazoline (Naphcon), xylometazoline (Otrivin Pediatric Nasal) and tetrahydrozoline (Visine).

The exact mechanism of clonidine toxicity is not fully understood. Because of functional overlap between α2 and µ receptors, symptoms of clonidine toxicity can mimic those of opioid toxicity. Peripheral α1-receptor stimulation may cause a transient period of hypertension before centrally mediated bradycardia and hypotension predominate. In contrast to clonidine, the topical imidazolines are specifically designed to induce local α2-mediated peripheral vasoconstriction for their desired clinical effect. Toxicity from these agents may manifest as agitation, tachycardia, and hypertension, although CNS and respiratory depression similar to that seen with clonidine toxicity have also been reported with these agents.11,12

A minimum toxic dose of imidazoline has not been established. A clonidine level as low as 0.01 mg/kg has been shown in case reports to cause altered mental status in children, which correlates with ingestion of a single 0.1-mg tablet by a 10-kg child. Larger doses have been associated with more severe symptoms.12

Presenting Signs and Symptoms

Camphor

Camphor toxicity most often develops 5 to 90 minutes from the time of ingestion, but some case reports have noted presentations as late as 9 hours after ingestion.16 Clinical toxicity may first manifest with gastrointestinal complaints, from oral burning to nausea and vomiting. Initial CNS effects of hyperactivity such as irritability, hyperreflexia, and myoclonic jerking may progress to seizure, delirium, and coma. Seizures are common and may persist for up to 24 hours, although this does not seem to have prognostic implications.2 When death occurs, it is usually the result of status epilepticus or respiratory failure.

Differential Diagnosis and Medical Decision Making

In the ideal situation, the differential diagnosis and medical decision making for a given exposure will be guided by knowledge of the ingested agent. Unfortunately, many children ingest toxic agents without direct observation by their caretakers, and the children come to medical care only when they exhibit signs of intoxication such as altered mental status, respiratory depression, and seizure.

In the patient with an undifferentiated condition who presents with any of these signs of systemic illness, the emergency physician must keep toxic exposure in the differential diagnosis while performing a broad work-up for infectious and metabolic causes of the patient’s illness. A detailed history elicited from the child’s parents and caregivers should include any possible household chemical, prescription, or over-the-counter medications with which the child may have come into contact. This history should include any visitors, such as grandparents, who may have transported their own medications into the home in a purse or suitcase.

The initial evaluation should include a complete blood count, basic chemistry panel with full electrolytes, and bedside glucose determination. An ECG study should be considered to evaluate for arrhythmia, heart block, and QRS widening. In general, serum drug levels are not helpful in guiding initial diagnosis and management because they may not provide clinically useful information other than confirming that a given exposure took place, and results may not be readily available. An exception is the salicylate level, which can be used to guide therapy and management. That said, treatment should not be delayed while awaiting this result when salicylate ingestion is strongly suspected or when the patient is symptomatic. Although acetaminophen is not included on the “One Pill Can Kill” list, an N-acetyl-p-aminophenol (APAP) level is often checked concurrently whenever undifferentiated ingestion is suspected.

During the history or physical examination, the astute physician may pick up a few agent-specific clues that will help guide the diagnosis of a particular toxic exposure in a child with altered mental status. The identification of a cluster of signs and symptoms suggestive of a toxidrome is helpful: anticholinergic symptoms should raise the suspicion of Lomotil or TCA exposure; an opioid toxidrome suggests possible imidazoline or Lomotil exposure. Salicylate overdose and camphor ingestion should be considered in the differential diagnosis of febrile seizure; in salicylate overdose, febrile seizure represents severe salicylate intoxication, whereas in camphor overdose, it reflects parents’ use of camphor to treat symptoms of viral illness. A cyanotic child with symptoms out of proportion to pulse oximetry should raise suspicion of methemoglobinemia and should prompt cooximetry measurement. Significant hypotension should raise concern for TCA, clonidine, calcium channel blocker, or salicylate overdose. Hypoglycemia should raise the suspicion of sulfonylurea or salicylate exposure; hyperglycemia suggests calcium channel blocker ingestion.

In cases of suspected caustic exposure, pulse oximetry and a chest radiograph may be useful, but radiographic evidence of clinically significant aspiration may not be apparent for 6 hours or more. In a severe caustic ingestion accompanied by chest or abdominal pain, a radiograph should be obtained to evaluate for the presence of free air.

Treatment

Hospital

Supportive care is the mainstay of treatment for toxic exposures. The ABCs (airway, breathing, and circulation) are of the utmost importance, and the airway is secured early in patients with compromised respiratory status, mental status depression, or risk of aspiration. Fluid resuscitation should be initiated early and aggressively in patients with hypotension. Seizures, regardless of causative agent, should generally be treated with benzodiazepines as first-line agents and with phenobarbital in refractory cases.

Gastric decontamination in toxic ingestions has historically been a controversial topic and poses unique problems in the pediatric patient. The AACT and EAPCCT’s joint position on the routine use of gastric lavage states that the weight of evidence does not demonstrate a beneficial clinical effect and that the risk of adverse outcomes such as aspiration, laryngospasm, or perforation outweighs the questionable benefits.22 An additional issue concerning lavage in the pediatric patient is that smaller children may not easily accommodate the 36 to 40 French catheter often needed to remove particulate material effectively.

Single-dose activated charcoal is similarly not recommended for routine use by the AACT and EAPCCT but may be considered in specific cases.23 Risks associated with charcoal administration include vomiting and aspiration, decreased effectiveness of oral antidotes, and an obscured view of the oropharynx should intubation or endoscopy become necessary.21 Data from volunteers implied that the reduction of toxin absorption may not be clinically significant if activated charcoal is administered more than 1 hour following ingestion, but a potential benefit after 1 hour cannot be excluded.23 Charcoal use is contraindicated in a patient without an intact or protected airway. Convincing a toddler to drink a gritty slurry may prove extremely difficult, and the distress caused by forcibly administering this therapy must be weighed against the benefits on a case-by-case basis.

Whole-bowel irrigation is not routinely recommended but should be considered in a patients who has ingested sustained-release or enteric-coated tablets, particularly if the patient presents more than 2 hours following ingestion.24 This procedure is contraindicated in cases of ileus, bowel obstruction or perforation, hemodynamic instability, or compromised airway.

Agents with specific treatment antidotes or guidelines are discussed next (Table 158.5).

Calcium Channel Blockers

Calcium channel blocker overdoses in the pediatric patient should be managed aggressively following the same algorithm as for adult ingestions, with the use of atropine, calcium, glucagon, vasopressors, or hyperinsulinemia-euglycemic therapy, as warranted (see Chapter 148). Because of the danger of delayed and prolonged presentation, activated charcoal administration or whole-bowel irrigation should be considered in these patients if ingestion of extended-release formulations is suspected.

Tricyclic Antidepressants

Pediatric TCA overdoses should be managed aggressively according to the same algorithm that is applied to adults: alkalinization with sodium bicarbonate, benzodiazepines for seizures, and supportive care (see Chapter 147). Given the lethality of a large enough dose and the concern for delayed gastric emptying secondary to anticholinergic effects, activated charcoal should be considered in the first 1 to 2 hours of a known exposure.

Follow-Up and Next Steps in Care

Observation and Admission Versus Discharge

Regardless of suspected agents, most pediatric patients with toxic exposures or suspected ingestions can be observed for 4 to 6 hours. Patients who remain asymptomatic may be safely discharged home. Exceptions and additional management information relevant to specific substances follow.

Children with suspected salicylate exposure who are found to have a positive blood level require hospital admission with levels rechecked every 2 hours until they are clinically improving, have a decreasing and nontoxic salicylate level, and have an alkalemic blood pH.11

With respect to calcium channel blocker ingestion, although a 6-hour period of observation is sufficient for ingestions of immediate-release formulations, a 12- to 24-hour observation period is recommended if concern exists about exposure to extended-release formulations.

The observation period for suspected Lomotil ingestion is not well described, especially if significant exposure is a concern. Because symptoms have been shown to be delayed by up to 24 hours, patients with concerning ingestions should be observed for at least this long.

Patients who have ingested sulfonylureas should be monitored for 8 hours because of the possibility of delayed presentation. Patients should be monitored for longer if the ingested medication is a sustained-release formulation.

References

1 Bronstein AC, Spyker DA, Cantilena LR, Jr., et al. 2009 Annual report of the American Association of Poison Control Centers’ National Poison Data System (NPDS): 27th annual report. Clin Toxicol (Phila). 2010;48:979–1178.

2 Love JN, Sammon M, Smereck J. Are one or two dangerous? Camphor exposure in toddlers. J Emerg Med. 2004;27:49–54.

3 Khine H, Weiss D, Graber N, et al. A cluster of children with seizures caused by camphor poisoning. Pediatrics. 2009;123:1269–1272.

4 Davis JE. Are one or two dangerous? Methyl salicylate exposure in toddlers. J Emerg Med. 2007;32:63–69.

5 Curtis LA, Dolan TS, Seibert HE. Are one or two dangerous? Lidocaine and topical anesthetic exposures in children. J Emerg Med. 2009;37:32–39.

6 Dayan PS, Litovitz TL, Crouch BI, et al. Fatal accidental dibucaine poisoning in children. Ann Emerg Med. 1996;28:442–445.

7 Perry HE. Pediatric poisonings from household products: hydrofluoric acid and methacrylic acid. Curr Opin Pediatr. 2001;13:157–161.

8 Arroyo AM, Kao LW. Calcium channel blocker toxicity. Pediatr Emerg Care. 2009;25:532–538.

9 Ranniger C, Roche C. Are one or two dangerous? Calcium channel blocker exposure in toddlers. J Emerg Med. 2007;33:145–154.

10 Love JN, Sikka N. Are 1–2 tablets dangerous? Beta-blocker exposure in toddlers. J Emerg Med. 2004;26:309–314.

11 Michael JB, Sztajnkrycer MD. Deadly pediatric poisons: nine common agents that kill at low doses. Emerg Med Clin North Am. 2004;22:1019–1050.

12 Eddy O, Howell JM. Are one or two dangerous? Clonidine and topical imidazolines exposure in toddlers. J Emerg Med. 2003;25:297–302.

13 Thomas TJ, Pauze D, Love JN. Are one or two dangerous? Diphenoxylate-atropine exposure in toddlers. J Emerg Med. 2008;34:71–75.

14 Little GL, Boniface KS. Are one or two dangerous? Sulfonylurea exposure in toddlers. J Emerg Med. 2005;28:305–310.

15 Rosenbaum TG, Kou M. Are one or two dangerous? Tricyclic antidepressant exposure in toddlers. J Emerg Med. 2005;28:169–174.

16 Ruha AM, Graeme KA, Field A. Late seizure following ingestion of Vicks VapoRub. Acad Emerg Med. 2003;10:691.

17 Riffat F, Cheng A. Pediatric caustic ingestion: 50 consecutive cases and a review of the literature. Dis Esophagus. 2009;22:89–94.

18 Henry K, Harris CR. Deadly ingestions. Pediatr Clin North Am. 2006;53:293–315.

19 McCarron MM, Challoner KR, Thompson GA. Diphenoxylate-atropine (Lomotil) overdose in children: an update (report of eight cases and review of the literature). Pediatrics. 1991;87:694–700.

20 American Academy of Clinical Toxicology, European Association of Poisons Centres and Clinical Toxicologists. Position paper: ipecac syrup. J Toxicol Clin Toxicol. 2004;42:133–143.

21 Greene S, Harris C, Singer J. Gastrointestinal decontamination of the poisoned patient. Pediatr Emerg Care. 2008;24:176–186.

22 Vale JA, Kulig K, American Academy of Clinical ToxicologyEuropean Association of Poisons Centres and Clinical Toxicologists. Position paper: gastric lavage. J Toxicol Clin Toxicol. 2004;42:933–943.

23 Chyka PA, Seger D, Krenzelok EP, Vale JA. American Academy of Clinical Toxicology and European Association of Poisons Centres and Clinical Toxicologists. Position paper: single-dose activated charcoal. Clin Toxicol (Phila). 2005;43:61–87.

24 American Academy of Clinical Toxicology, European Association of Poisons Centres and Clinical Toxicologists. Position paper: whole bowel irrigation. J Toxicol Clin Toxicol. 2004;42:843–854.

25 Peclova D, Navratil T. Do corticosteroids prevent oesophageal stricture after corrosive ingestion? Toxicol Rev. 2005;24:125–129.