Pain

Published on 02/03/2015 by admin

Filed under Basic Science

Last modified 22/04/2025

Print this page

rate 1 star rate 2 star rate 3 star rate 4 star rate 5 star
Your rating: none, Average: 0 (0 votes)

This article have been viewed 1748 times

33 Pain

Pain can be defined as:

‘An unpleasant sensory and emotional experience associated with actual or potential tissue damage, or described in terms of such damage’.

Acute pain may be thought of as a physiological process having a biological function, allowing the patient to avoid or minimise injury. Persistent pain, on the other hand, may be described more as a disease than a symptom (Woolf, 2004).

Aetiology and neurophysiology

Neuroanatomy of pain transmission

The majority of tissues and organs are innervated by special sensory receptors (nociceptors) connected to primary afferent nerve fibres of differing diameters. Small myelinated Aδ fibres and unmyelinated C fibres are responsible for the transmission of painful stimuli to the spinal cord where these afferent primary fibres terminate in the dorsal horn.

Pain transmission further within the Central Nervous System (CNS) is far more complex and understood less well. The most important parts of this process are the wide dynamic range cells in the spinothalamic tract that project to the thalamus and to the somatosensory cortex beyond. Modulation or inhibition of these neurones within the spinal cord result in less activity in the pain pathway. This modulatory action can be activated by stress or certain analgesic drugs such as morphine and is an important component of the gate theory of pain (Fig. 33.1). The gate control theory recognises the pivotal role the spinal cord plays in the continual modulation of neuronal activity by the relative activity of large (Aβ) and small (Aδ and C) fibres and by descending messages from the brain. Conversely, other influences can lead to an increased sensitivity to noxious stimuli. The most important of these is pain itself and further painful stimuli can lead to increased pain from relatively trivial insults. This occurs through neurochemical and anatomical changes within the CNS that have been termed central sensitisation.

Assessment of pain

Evaluation of pain should include a detailed description of the pain and an assessment of its consequences. There should be a full history, psychosocial assessment, medication history and assessment of previous pain problems, paying attention to factors that influence the pain. Diagnostic laboratory tests, imaging, including plain radiography, computer tomography (CT) and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), and diagnostic nerve blocks may aid confirmation of the diagnosis.

Pain is a subjective phenomenon and quantitative assessment is difficult (Breivik et al., 2008). The most commonly used instruments are visual analogue and verbal rating scales. Visual analogue scales are 10 cm long lines labelled with an extreme at each end; usually ‘no pain at all’ and ‘worst pain imaginable’. The patient is required to mark the severity of the pain between the two extremes of the scale. Verbal rating scales use descriptors such as ‘none’, ‘mild’, ‘moderate’ and ‘excruciating’. More elaborate questionnaires such as the Brief Pain Inventory and the McGill Pain Questionnaire help to describe other aspects of the pain, and pain diaries record the influence of activity and medication on pain.

Management

Acute pain usually results from noxious stimulation as a result of tissue damage or injury. It can be managed effectively using analgesic drugs and is often self-limiting.

Persistent pain may be considered as pain which continues beyond the usual time required for tissue healing. Treatment may involve specialist pain management services, hospices and a multidisciplinary approach that assesses and manages patients using a biopsychosocial approach. Initial treatment is usually directed at the underlying disease process where possible, for example, medication, surgery or anti-tumour therapy. However, non-medical treatments such as physical therapy and various psychological techniques including cognitive behavioural therapy may also form part of a multi-modal treatment programme. Pain can be modulated using non-pharmacological techniques: for example, stimulation-produced analgesia such as transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation (TENS), acupuncture and massage, or invasive procedures such as neurosurgery or neurolytic nerve blocks.

Analgesic ladder

The World Health Organization (WHO) analgesic ladder (Fig. 33.2) forms the basis of many approaches to the use of analgesic drugs. There are essentially three steps: non-opioid analgesics, weak opioids and strong opioids. The analgesic efficacy of non-opioids, such as paracetamol and non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) (e.g. aspirin, ibuprofen and diclofenac), is limited by side effects and ceiling effects, that is, beyond a certain dose, no further pharmacological effect is seen. If pain remains uncontrolled, then a weak opioid, such as codeine or dihydrocodeine, may be helpful. There may be additional benefit in combining a weak opioid with a non-opioid drug, although many commercial preparations contain inadequate quantities of both components and are no more effective than a non-opioid alone. Strong opioids, of which morphine is considered the gold standard, have no ceiling effect and therefore increased dosage continues to give increased analgesia but side effects often limit effectiveness. Adjuvant drugs, such as corticosteroids, antidepressants or anti-epileptics, may be considered at any step of the ladder.

Analgesic drugs

Paracetamol

Despite being used in clinical practice for over 50 years and much investigation, the mechanism by which paracetamol exerts its analgesic effect remains uncertain. Inhibition of prostaglandin synthesis within the CNS has been proposed, although this is probably not the only mechanism. Interaction with the serotonin (Tjolsen et al., 1991) and endocannabinoid (Högestätt et al., 2005) neurotransmitter systems have been demonstrated in animal models.

Following oral administration the bioavailability of paracetamol is around 60%, but if given by the rectal route it is much lower and much more variable. A formulation for intravenous infusion has been promoted over the last few years and this has largely replaced the rectal route of administration. Therapeutic plasma levels are reached within 30 min of oral administration. The elimination half-life of paracetamol is relatively short (t½ = 2–4 h); hence, frequent dosing is required to maintain its analgesic effect.

With normal doses, the majority of paracetamols are metabolised and inactivated in the liver, undergoing a phase II conjugation reaction with glucuronic acid (Fig. 33.3). A small P450 mediated reaction that forms a reactive intermediate, N-acteyl-p-benzoquinimine (NAPQI). Usually, NAPQI can be deactivated by conjugation with glutathione in the liver. However, following ingestion of a large amount of paracetamol the hepatic stores of both glucuronic acid and glutathione become depleted leaving free NAPQI, which causes liver damage.

The usual therapeutic dose for adults is paracetamol 1 g taken four times daily. It is very important that this dose is not exceeded, otherwise hepatotoxicity is more common. This may be particularly problematic for malnourished adults with low body weight (Claridge et al., 2010). A reduced maximum daily infusion dose (3 g/24 hours) is recommended for patients with hepatocellular insufficiency, chronic alcoholism or dehydration. Paracetamol is also available as an over-the-counter (OTC) medicine and is a component of many cold and influenza remedies. Compared with other analgesics, paracetamol is not as potent; however, when taken in combination with a NSAID or opioid, there is an additive analgesic effect.

Non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs

Mode of action

NSAIDs exert their analgesic and anti-inflammatory effects through inhibition of the enzyme cyclo-oxygenase. NSAIDs are used widely to relieve pain, with or without inflammation, in people with acute and persistent musculoskeletal disorders. In single doses, NSAIDs have superior analgesic activity compared to paracetamol (Hyllested et al., 2002). In regular higher dosages, they have both analgesic and anti-inflammatory effects, which makes them particularly useful for the treatment of continuous or regular pain associated with inflammation. NSAIDs have been shown to be suitable for the relief of pain in dysmenorrhoea, toothache and some headaches and to treat pain caused by secondary bone tumours, which result from lysis of bone and release of prostaglandins.

Weak opioids

Weak opioids are prescribed frequently, either alone or in combination with other analgesics, for a wide variety of painful disorders. There are three major drugs in this group, codeine, dihydrocodeine and dextropropoxyphene, which are recommended as step 2 of the WHO analgesic ladder for pain that has not responded to non-opioid analgesics. Despite this recommendation, there is little data which demonstrates that weak opioids are of any benefit in the relief of persistent pain, and it may be more beneficial to use a smaller dose of a strong opioid.

Co-proxamol, a combination of dextropropoxyphene and paracetamol, was withdrawn in the UK in 2007 following safety concerns, particularly toxicity in overdose. An unlicensed product remains available for patients who find it difficult to change to alternative treatment.

Dextropropoxyphene

Historically, dextropropoxyphene was prescribed in combination with other analgesics such as paracetamol (co-proxamol). There are few data on its therapeutic value, and at least one review concluded that analgesic efficacy is less than aspirin and barely more than placebo. At best, dextropropoxyphene failed to show any superiority over paracetamol (Li Wan Po and Zhang, 1997). At worst, it is a dangerous drug which has the potential for steadily developing toxicity. Patients with hepatic dysfunction and poor renal function are particularly at risk. It is associated with problems in overdose, notably a non-naloxone reversible depression of the cardiac conducting system. Dextropropoxyphene interacts unpredictably with a number of drugs, including carbamazepine and warfarin. In 2005, the Medicines and Healthcare products Regulatory Agency (MHRA) announced concerns about the safety and effectiveness of co-proxamol and directed that it should be withdrawn from clinical use in the UK; however, it still remains available as an unlicensed medicine for the small number of patients who do not obtain analgesia with other analgesic medicines.

Strong opioids

Other strong opioids

Opioids such as pethidine and dextromoramide offer little advantage over morphine in that they are generally weaker in action with a relatively short duration of action (2 h). Dipipanone is only available in a preparation which contains an antiemetic (cyclizine), and increasing doses lead to sedation and the risk of developing a tardive dyskinesia with long-term use. Methadone has a long elimination half-life of 15–25 h, and accumulation occurs in the early stages of use. It has minimal side effects with long-term use and some patients who experience serious adverse effects with morphine may tolerate methadone.

Hydromorphone and oxycodone are synthetic opioids that have been used for many years in North America and more recently in Europe. They are available in both immediate and modified release preparations. Some patients appear to tolerate hydromorphone or oxycodone better than morphine but there is no evidence to suggest which patients achieve the best effect with either of these drugs.

Fentanyl is available as a transdermal formulation for long-term use. The patch is designed to release the drug continuously over 3 days. When starting the drug, alternative analgesic therapy should be continued for at least the first 12 h until therapeutic levels are achieved, and an immediate acting opioid should be available for breakthrough pain. Patches are replaced every 72 h.

The relative potencies of the commonly used opioids are summarised in Table 33.1.

Table 33.1 Relative potencies of opioid drugs

Drug Potency (morphine = 1)
Codeine 0.1
Dihydrocodeine 0.1
Tramadol 0.2
Pethidine 0.1
Morphine 1
Diamorphine 2.5
Hydromorphone 7
Methadone 2–10 (with repeat dosing)
Fentanyl (transdermal) 150

Agonist-antagonist and partial agonists

Most of the drugs in this category are either competitive antagonists at the μ opioid receptor, where they can bind to the site but exert no action, or they exert only limited actions; that is, they are partial agonists. Those that are antagonists at the μ opioid receptor can provoke a withdrawal syndrome in patients receiving concomitant opioid agonists such as morphine. These properties make it difficult to use these agents in the control of persistent pain, and the process of conversion from one group of drugs to another can be complex.

Adverse effects of opioids

The adverse effects of opioids are nearly all dose related, and tolerance develops to the majority with long-term use.

Tolerance, dependence and addition

Persistent treatment with opioids often causes tolerance to the analgesic effect, although the mechanism remains unclear (Holden et al., 2005). When this occurs the dosage should be increased or, alternatively, another opioid can be substituted, since cross-tolerance is not usually complete. Addiction is very rare when opioids are prescribed for pain relief.

Epidural analgesia

Epidural injections and infusions may be effective in relieving pain arising from both malignant causes and non-cancer diseases and are very effective in postoperative and labour pain. Various combinations of local anaesthetics, opioids or steroids can be administered into the epidural space near to the spinal level of the pain.

Local anaesthetics

Local anaesthetic drugs, such as lidocaine and bupivacaine, produce reversible blockade of neural transmission in automonic, sensory and motor nerve fibres by binding to sodium channels in the axon membrane from within, preventing sodium ion entry during depolarisation. The threshold potential is not reached, and consequently the action potential is not propagated. The concentration of local anaesthetic and dose used determine the onset, density and duration of the block. There are marked differences in the recommended maximum safe doses of different local anaesthetic agents. If the maximum dose is exceeded, serious cardiovascular (arrhythymias) and CNS effects (convulsions) may be observed.

Local anaesthetic drugs injected close to a sensory nerve or plexus will block the conduction of nerve impulses, including pain from sensory fibres and provide excellent analgesia. Some local anaesthetics are given with adrenaline (epinephrine) to reduce systemic toxicity and increase the duration of action.

Local anaesthetics can be applied directly to wounds or by local infiltration to produce postoperative analgesia; however, these approaches will not normally block pain arising from deep internal organs. Local anaesthetic techniques are particularly useful in day-stay surgery and children. Continuous infusions via a catheter will allow prolonged analgesia. More permanent neural blockade for the control of cancer pain may be achieved by using a neurolytic agent such as absolute alcohol or phenol.

A topical formulation of lidocaine has been marketed for the management of neuropathic pain caused by post-herpetic neuralgia. Up to three plasters may be worn for a 12-h period each day.

Adjuvant medication

To be an analgesic, a drug must relieve pain in animal models and give demonstrable and reliable pain relief in patients. Drugs such as the opioids and the NSAIDs clearly are analgesics. In some types of pain, such as cancer pain or neuropathic pain, the addition of non-analgesic drugs to analgesic therapy can enhance pain relief. A list of some adjuvant drugs is given in Table 33.2. It should be remembered that some drugs such as tricyclic antidepressants (TCAs) have intrinsic analgesic activity, perhaps related to their ability to affect 5-HT and noradrenergic neurotransmission.

Table 33.2 Adjuvant drugs used in the treatment of pain

Drug class Type of pain Example
Anti-epileptics Neuropathic pain Carbamazepine
Migraine Sodium valproate
Cluster headache Gabapentin
Pregabalin
Lamotrigine
Antidepressants Neuropathic pain Amitriptyline
Musculoskeletal pain Imipramine
Venlafaxine
Duloxetine
Intravenous anaesthetic agents Neuropathic pain Ketamine
Burn pain  
Cancer pain  
Skeletal muscle relaxants Muscle spasm Baclofen
Spasticity Dantrolene
Botulinum toxin (type A)
Steroids Raised intracranial pressure Dexamethasone
Prednisolone
Nerve compression  
Antibiotics Infection As indicated by culture and sensitivity
Antispasmodics Colic Hyoscine butylbromide
Smooth muscle spasm Loperamide
Hormones/hormonal analogues Malignant bone pain Calcitonin
Spinal stenosis Octreotide
Intestinal obstruction  
Bisphosphonates Bone pain (caused by cancer or osteoporosis) Pamidronate (for cancer pain)
Alendronate

Antidepressants

Persistent pain is accompanied frequently by anxiety and depression. Thus, it is not surprising that the use of antidepressants and other psychoactive drugs is a routine component of pain management. There is evidence that some of these drugs have analgesic properties independent of their psychotropic effects.

The TCAs are frequently used for the treatment of persistent pain conditions with and without the anti-epileptics, and there is a substantial body of literature about their analgesic action (McQuay et al., 1996).

The biochemical activity of the TCAs suggests that their main effect is on serotonergic and noradrenergic neurones. The TCAs inhibit the reuptake of the monoamines, 5-HT and/or noradrenaline in neurones found within in the brain and spinal cord. Through a rather complex mechanism, this causes an initial fall in the release of these transmitters followed by a sustained rise in the concentration of neurotransmitter at synapses in the pain neural pathways. This rise usually takes 2–3 weeks to develop. Tricyclic antidepressants are effective analgesics in headache, facial pain, low back pain, arthritis, and, to a lesser degree, cancer pain.

Clinical use of antidepressants in persistent pain

When used in pain management, it is usual to start with a very low TCA dose, for example, amitriptyline 10–25 mg at night and to titrate upwards according to response and adverse effects. Within clinical trials TCA doses have varied considerably but most are lower than used in psychiatry, in the order of amitriptyline 50–75 mg/day. Under specialist supervision higher doses, for example, amitriptyline 150–200 mg/day may be appropriate.

Tricyclic antidepressants have a wide range of adverse effects due to interaction with histamine and muscarinic acetylcholine receptors and these may cause a marked reduction in patient adherence. Newer antidepressant drugs have generally been disappointing from the analgesic perspective. However, much of the research has looked at the selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SSRIs). Scientific (Sindrup and Jensen, 1999) and clinical evidence (Sindrup et al., 2005) suggest that a combination of noradrenergic and serotonergic transmission both need to be enhanced for an analgesic effect to be seen. The serotonin/noradrenaline reuptake inhibitors (SNRIs) venlafaxine and duloxetine have effects on both monoamines and appear to possess analgesic activity in neuropathic pain models. A number of antidepressant compounds, including trazodone and mirtazepine, do not act via monoamine reuptake inhibition and do not appear to possess intrinsic analgesic activity. They are effective antidepressants and may have a place in the treatment of co-existing depression but analgesia should be treated separately.

Anti-epileptics

The usefulness of this group of drugs is well established for the treatment of neuropathic pain (McQuay et al., 1995). Conditions which may respond to anti-epileptics include trigeminal neuralgia, glossopharyngeal neuralgia, various neuropathies, lancinating pain arising from conditions such as postherpetic neuralgia and multiple sclerosis and similar pains that may follow amputation or surgery. Several classes of drugs show anti-epileptic activity and these can be broadly classed as sodium channel blockers (carbamazepine, phenytoin), glutamate inhibitors (lamotrigine), voltage gated calcium channel ligands (gabapentin, pregabalin), GABA potentiators (sodium valproate, tiagabine) or drugs showing a mixture of these effects (topiramate). Failure to respond to one particular drug does not indicate that anti-epileptics as a broad class will be ineffective. A drug with a different mechanism of action or combination therapy could be considered.

Anti-epileptics are surprisingly effective in the prophylaxis of migraine and cluster headache. Their mode of action is unclear but both of these conditions are associated with abnormal excitability of certain groups of neurones and the neuronal depression caused by anti-epileptics is probably important.

Skeletal muscle relaxants

Drugs described in this section are used for the relief of muscle spasm or spasticity. It is essential that the underlying cause of the spasticity and any aggravating factors such as pressure sores or infections are treated. Skeletal muscle relaxants usually help spasticity but this may be at the cost of decreased muscle tone elsewhere, which may lead to a decrease in patient mobility, which may make matters worse.

The drug of first choice is probably baclofen, which has a peripheral site of action, working directly on skeletal muscle. Baclofen is a derivative of the inhibitory neurotransmitter GABA and appears to be an agonist at the GABAB receptor. It is used commonly in the treatment of spasticity caused by multiple sclerosis or other diseases of the spinal cord, especially traumatic lesions.

Dantrolene is an alternative that is effective orally and which may have fewer, but potentially more serious, adverse effects. Its effect is due to a direct action on skeletal muscle and takes several weeks to develop.

The α2-adrenergic agonist tizanidine has potent muscle relaxant activity and is an alternative to baclofen. It may also have some direct analgesic effects.

Cannabinoids

Cannabis has been used as an analgesic for hundreds of years. Problems concerning the legal status of cannabis in most countries have hindered scientific investigation of its analgesic properties. The active ingredient in preparations made from the hemp plant, Cannabis sativa, is δ-9 tetrahydrocannabinol. This compound has analgesic activity in animal models of experimental pain as well as in the clinical situation (Burns and Ineck, 2006). Overall, analgesic activity appears relatively weak and it has not been possible to separate the analgesic activity from the potent psychotropic effects characteristic of these drugs but a commercial preparation is now licensed for the management of spasticity in multiple sclerosis. There may be a clearer analgesic effect in neuropathic pain but the evidence for this remains anecdotal.

Treatment of selected pain syndromes

Postoperative pain

The majority of patients experience pain following surgery. The site and nature of surgery influences the severity of pain, although individual variation between patients does not allow prediction of the severity of pain by the type of operation.

Apart from the obvious humanitarian benefit of relieving suffering, pain relief is desirable for a number of physiological reasons after surgery or any form of major tissue injury. For example, poor-quality analgesia reduces respiratory function, increases heart rate and blood pressure, and amplifies the stress response to surgery. The use of intermittent and patient-controlled intermittent intravenous opioids injections has been described earlier in this chapter. However, opioids themselves may delay recovery and are associated with adverse events in the postoperative period (Kehlet et al., 1996). It is now common to treat postoperative pain using a ‘multimodal approach’, consisting of paracetamol, NSAIDs, opioids and local anaesthetic blocks or wound infiltration. NSAIDs such as diclofenac and ketorolac are used frequently, but must be used with caution in the postoperative period where there is a possibility of renal stress, such as blood loss, and the normal protective effect of prostaglandins on the kidney will be lost, culminating in acute renal failure. There is no evidence to support the pre-emptive use of either NSAIDs or local anaesthetic techniques, although there is some theoretical and clinical evidence suggesting that opioids given prior to surgery may be more effective than when given postoperatively.

Cancer pain

Cancer and pain are not synonymous. One-third of patients with cancer do not experience severe pain. Of the remaining two-thirds that do, about 88% can be controlled using basic principles of pain management (Scottish Intercollegiate Guidelines Network, 2008). Pain associated with cancer may arise from many different sources, and may exhibit the characteristics of both acute and persistent pain. The mechanisms and sources of cancer pain may change with time and regular assessment is required. Cancer occurs more frequently in the elderly, who may have a larger proportion of painful conditions than the general population. Pain may be arising from these sources too, and these require treatment at the same time.

Cancer pain can be treated both with drugs and other interventional techniques, such as radiotherapy and nerve blocks. Usually, drug treatment is based on the WHO analgesic ladder together with the use of adjuvant analgesics. Opioids are the mainstay for the treatment of cancer pain, although increasingly some clinicians progress from non-opioid drugs to a strong opioid such as morphine, omitting the middle step of the analgesic ladder.

Although this chapter is concerned only with the management of pain, care of the patient with a terminal illness requires management of all aspects of the patient. The Liverpool Care Pathway (LCP) is a resource recommended to promote high-quality care in the last days of life (Ellershaw and Wilkinson, 2003). At a basic level, the LCP is a way of acknowledging that death is imminent and ensuring the patient’s comfort by omitting long-term non-essential medication and anticipatory prescribing in case the patient experiences pain, delirium, vomiting or breathlessness.

Opioid use in cancer pain

Morphine is the first-line opioid used for the management of cancer pain and may be given in immediate or modified release oral formulations. If not tolerated, alternatives such as oxycodone or hydromorphone, both having relatively long half-lives, may be considered. Optimal dosage is determined on an individual basis for each patient by titration against the pain. Patients requiring long-term modified release opioids should have additional oral doses of rapidly acting opioid to act as an ‘escape’ medicine for incident or breakthrough pain. The British National Formulary recommends that the standard dose of a strong opioid for breakthrough pain is one-tenth to one-sixth of the regular 24 hour total daily dose. Methadone should not be used as first-line treatment of cancer pain, but may be useful when alternatives have failed or the patient has experienced intolerable adverse effects.

When the oral route is unavailable, other routes of administration such as the buccal, rectal, transdermal or parenteral (subcutaneous, intravenous) or spinal (epidural or intrathecal) routes may be considered. Syringe drivers or implanted pumps may be used to provide analgesia in cases where conventional opioid delivery is ineffective. Morphine and oxycodone are available for parenteral administration and in the UK, diamorphine is also suitable and readily available. Diamorphine hydrochloride has the advantage of being very water soluble, so a high dose may be given in a small volume, which reduces the frequency of changes of syringes and refills necessary to provide adequate pain relief. The proportion of patients who need an implanted pump for intrathecal drug delivery is extremely small and is confined largely to those who are persistently troubled with unacceptable adverse effects. Such patients may achieve pain relief with lower equivalent opioid doses and have few problems with side effects. Long-term maintenance of indwelling lines and catheters requires training for the patient and specialist expertise from physicians and nursing teams, but excellent long-term results are possible.

Use of adjuvant drugs and treatments for cancer pain

Neuropathic pain is common in cancer. As many as 40% of cancer patients may have a neuropathic component to their pain. Tricyclic antidepressants and anti-epileptic drugs should be introduced early but where these are ineffective, ketamine may have an important role.

Levomepromazine, a phenothiazine with analgesic activity, is a useful alternative when opioids cannot be tolerated. It causes neither constipation nor respiratory depression and has antiemetic and anxiolytic activity. It is sedative, which may be either a virtue or a problem in palliative care.

Corticosteroids are useful in managing certain aspects of acute and persistent cancer pain. They are particularly useful for raised intracranial pressure and for relieving pressure caused by tumours on the spinal cord or peripheral nerves. Dexamethasone is the most commonly used steroid to ameliorate raised intracranial pressure in patients with brain tumours. High steroid doses given for 1 or 2 weeks do not require a reducing-dosage regimen. Also, they may produce a feeling of well-being, increased appetite and weight gain, all beneficial for cancer patients, although these effects are usually transient.

It is essential that underlying causes of pain be treated; therefore, it is appropriate to use antibiotics to treat infections, radiotherapy to reduce tumour bulk or control bone pain, or surgery to achieve fracture fixation or to relieve bowel obstruction in conjunction with antispasmodics such as hyoscine butylbromide.

Specific cancer pain syndromes

Three types of malignant pain are briefly outlined below to indicate various therapeutic approaches.

Neuropathic pain

Neuropathic pain may be defined as ‘pain arising as a direct consequence of a disease or lesion affecting the somatosensory system’ and may occur as a result of pathological damage to nerve fibres in a peripheral nerve or in the CNS (see Table 33.3). Neuropathic pain may be spontaneous in nature (continuous or paroxysmal) or evoked by sensory stimuli. As the underlying aetiology is different to inflammatory types of pain, patients typically present with disturbances in sensory function often describing their pain as tingling, shooting or electric shocks. It is possible for patients to present with pain in the context of sensory loss. Unlike inflammatory pain, neuropathic pain serves no biological advantage and can be described as an illness in its own right.

Table 33.3 Examples of causes of neuropathic pain

Cause of neuropathy Examples
Trauma Phantom limb
Peripheral nerve injury
Spinal cord injury
Surgical
Infection/inflammation Post-herpetic neuralgia
HIV
Compression Trigeminal neuralgia
Sciatica
Cancer Invasion/compression of nerve tissue by tumour
Ischaemia Post-stroke pain
Metabolic neuropathies (e.g. diabetic peripheral neuropathy)
Demyelination Multiple sclerosis
Drugs Vinca alkaloids
Ethanol
Taxols
Anti-bacterials for TB and HIV

Typically, neuropathic pain does not respond as well to conventional analgesics, such as paracetamol and NSAIDs. Guidelines for the pharmacological management of neuropathic pain in the non-specialist setting have been published (National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence, 2010).

Specific neuropathic pain syndromes

Diabetic peripheral polyneuropathy

Nerve damage and neuropathy is one of the long-term complications of diabetes mellitus (see Chapter 44) and is most prevalent in elderly patients with type II diabetes. Often patients describe numbness but also experience a burning sensation on their feet. The sensory loss can result in painless foot ulcers. Tricyclic antidepressants or serotonin noradrenaline reuptake inhibitors (duloxetine or venlafaxine), and anti-epileptics, such as gabapentin and pregabalin, have been demonstrated to be beneficial.

Peripheral nerve injury and neuropathy

Damage to, or entrapment of, nerves can cause pain, unpleasant sensations and paraesthesiae. Tricyclic antidepressants and anti-epileptic drugs, such as gabapentin, have been used with some success to treat neuropathic pain (Moore et al., 2011). A neuroma occurs when damaged or severed nerve fibres sprout new small fibres in an attempt to regenerate. Pain develops several weeks after the nerve injury, and is often due to the neuroma growing into scar tissue, causing pain as it is stretched or mobilised. Treatment of neuroma is very difficult and few treatments are successful. Options include surgery and injections of steroid and local anaesthetic agents.

Back and neck pain

Back pain is one of the commonest reasons for presentation to a medical practitioner. Despite this, the problem is poorly understood. The most practical classification is based on the duration of symptoms (BenDebba et al., 1997). Acute low pain is generally defined as pain that lasts for a few days or weeks. The majority of these problems tend to be self-limiting and resolve spontaneously. Typical treatments include rest, adequate analgesia with paracetamol, combined with a NSAID and/or a weak opioid, and physiotherapy.

Persistent back pain lasts for much longer and progressively leads to a chronic state associated with pain, depression, anxiety and disability. Early intervention is necessary to ensure good functional and vocational outcomes. If a patient is off work for as much as 6 months, then there is a less than 50% chance of them ever returning to work. The likelihood of returning to work falls to less than 25% after 1 year and is almost zero after 2 years. Although pharmacological therapies may aid rehabilitation, other treatment strategies have a greater role to play in the management of persistent back pain. Guidelines for the management of non-specific persistent low back pain have been developed (National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence, 2009). It is essential for the patient to develop self-management skills, and current recommendations emphasise the importance of using a biopsychosocial approach to manage this problem. Other treatment options include exercise programmes, manual therapy and acupuncture.

Postamputation and phantom limb pain

The majority of amputees suffer significant stump or phantom limb pain for at least a few weeks each year. Pain will be present in the immediate postoperative period in the stump, and this may be caused by muscle spasm, nerve injury and sensitivity of the wound and surrounding skin. As the wound heals, the pain generally subsides. If it does not, the reason may be vascular insufficiency or infection. Pain occurring some number of years after amputation may be caused by changes in the structure of the bones or skin in the stump. Reduction in the thickness of overlying tissue with age may expose nerve endings to increased stimuli or ischaemia. Usually, conventional analgesics are beneficial for stump pain, although sometimes relatively high doses may be required. Tricyclic antidepressants may also be helpful for stump pain, and surgery may be necessary to restore the vascular supply or reduce trauma to nerve endings.

Phantom pain is a referred pain which produces a burning or throbbing sensation, felt in the absent limb. Cramping sensations are caused by muscular spasm in the stump. The patient with phantom limb pain is often anxious, depressed and frightened, all of which exacerbate the pain. Conventional analgesic drugs alone are generally not adequate for phantom pain, but TCAs and anti-epileptic drugs are useful adjuvants. Other therapy which can be effective includes TENS and sympathetic blockade. These patients frequently require management at specialist pain centres.

Headache

Everybody experiences the occasional tension headaches. They are caused by muscle contraction over the neck and scalp. Often they respond to simple analgesics available over-the-counter, such as paracetamol and NSAIDs. They may also respond to TCA drugs given as a single dose at night as well as non-pharmacological treatments, such as TENS. NSAIDs may be indicated if the headache is associated with cervical spondylosis or neck injury.

Burn pain

Patients with burns may require a series of painful procedures such as physiotherapy, debridement or skin grafting. Premedication with a strong opioid before the procedure and the use of Entonox® (premixed 50% nitrous oxide and 50% oxygen) may be necessary to control the pain. Regular opioid administration may be useful to prevent the pain induced by movement or touch in the affected area. The anaesthetic drug ketamine (see above) has potent analgesic activity when used in subhypnotic doses. Its short duration of action may be beneficial to reduce the pain of dressing changes or other forms of incident pain. Even with low doses, a significant proportion of patients will experience side effects of dysphoria or hallucinations. These can be treated with benzodiazepines or antipsychotic compounds, such as haloperidol.

A summary of medicine indications and common therapeutic problems associated with analgesic use are presented in Table 33.4.

Table 33.4 Common therapeutic problems

Problem Solution Example
Neuropathic pain Anti-epileptics Carbamazepine
Sodium valproate
Gabapentin
Lamotrigine
Antidepressants Amitriptyline
Imipramine
Intravenous anaesthetic agents Ketamine
Malignant bone pain Bisphosphonates Pamidronate
Calcitonin
Muscle spasm/spasticity Skeletal muscle relaxants Baclofen
Dantrolene
Botulinum toxin (type A)
Raised intracranial pressure Corticosteroids Dexamethasone
Prednisolone
Nausea with morphine Antiemetic Cyclizne
Droperidol
Ondansetron
Use an alternative route of administration Topical or subcutaneous
Constipation Determine if drug induced, for example, opioids or tricyclic antidepressant Co-prescribe laxatives (e.g. docusate sodium and senna)
Antidepressants in patients with ischaemic heart disease Use a less cardiotoxic antidepressant Duloxetine, venlafaxine
Drug interactions with carbamazepine Use an anti-epileptic which does not affect hepatic enzymes Gabapentin
Renal failure Morphine accumulates; use lower dose Fentanyl
Buprenorphine
Use a drug which is not eliminated by kidney  
Sedation/ impaired cognition Identify any drug-related causes and adjust dose or stop drug  

Case studies

Answer

Management should begin with admission and rehydration. She may be dehydrated and have marked electrolyte abnormalities which would need to be corrected. The oral route is unavailable for the delivery of adequate analgesia, and thus consideration should be given to the use of parenteral administration, either by the subcutaneous route or using patient-controlled analgesia. The sickness should be treated, and an underlying cause sought. This may be subacute obstruction which, in turn, may be due to constipation caused by the opioids or by the disease process. Abdominal masses that indent on palpation are faeces (not tumour). Abdominal radiographs would show fluid levels if there was obstruction rather than constipation. Other possible causes of vomiting are recent anticancer therapy, anxiety, dyspepsia from NSAIDs, raised intracranial pressure and vertigo.

Surgery may be needed to relieve the obstruction, but the need may be avoided by use of hyoscine butylbromide, which may control colic with little additional sedation. If the problem is one of constipation, rectal measures may be necessary to re-establish function. These may include suppositories, enemas or digital disimpaction. Once control of pain has been achieved and bowel function has returned to normal, she must receive regular combination laxative therapy, ideally a stimulant laxative such as senna, and a faecal softener, such as docusate sodium. A high fluid intake and increased dietary fibre should be encouraged, as this will help prevent stool from becoming hard.

There has been interest in the use of peripheral opioid receptor antagonists to reduce opioid-induced constipation. As they have higher affinity for the opioid receptor than the agonist, they bind preferentially to opioid receptors in the gastro-intestinal tract, allowing the agonist to continue to have its desired effect in the CNS. A combination of prolonged-release oxycodone and prolonged release naloxone (Targinact®) may be an alternative if maximal laxative therapy does not help this patient.

Attention should be paid to Mrs NP’s emotional and spiritual needs at all times.

Answer

This patient is extremely ill and even with aggressive chemotherapy, he is unlikely to survive more than a few months. Most of his pain will be related to the destruction of bone and the aim should be to provide pain relief via a ‘central’ mechanism through the use of opioids as well as reducing the rate of bone destruction and associated inflammatory responses. A potent opioid will be required and oral morphine would usually be the drug of first choice. In this situation, a combination of a modified release preparation together with liberal ‘as required’ dosing would be appropriate. The correct dose is the dose required to produce adequate pain relief without producing excessive sedation. Inflammatory pain may be improved by the use of NSAIDs and these should be given regularly, although they may be contraindicated in this condition (see below). High dose corticosteroids may achieve a similar effect and may also reduce the hypercalcaemia that is often seen in myeloma. Bone destruction and its associated pain may be reduced by the use of bisphosphonate compounds. In this case, intravenous pamidronate should be given.

Renal failure is common in myeloma. This may be due to obstruction of renal tubules by myeloma proteins or the effects of some chemotherapeutic agents. If renal impairment occurs, opioids should be used with caution so as to avoid problems with accumulation. Transdermal fentanyl may be a more appropriate drug. NSAIDs can precipitate acute renal failure in the presence of reduced renal blood flow. Finally, platelet function is often poor in patients with myeloma. This can be due to direct effects of myeloma proteins on platelets, bone marrow replacement by myeloma or the effects of chemotherapy. Use of NSAIDs may be associated with increased risk of gastro-intestinal haemorrhage.

References

Annetta M.G., Iemma D., Garisto C., et al. Ketamine: new indications for an old drug. Curr. Drug Targets. 2005;6:789-794.

Ballantyne J.C., Mao J. Opioid therapy for chronic pain. N. Engl. J. Med.. 2003;349:1943-1953.

BenDebba M., Torgerson W.S., Long D.M. Personality traits, pain duration, and severity, functional impairment, and psychological distress in patients with persistent low back pain. Pain. 1997;72:115-125.

Breivik H., Borchgrevink, P.C., et al. Assessment of pain. British Journal of Anaesthesia. 2008;101:17-24.

Burns T.L., Ineck J.R. Cannabinoid analgesia as a potential new therapeutic option in the treatment of persistent pain. Ann. Pharmacother.. 2006;40:251-260.

Claridge L.C., Eksteen B., Smith A., et al. Acute liver failure after administration of paracetamol at the maximum recommended daily dose in adults. Br. Med. J. 341, c6764,. doi: 10.1136/bmj.c6764, 2010.

Ellershaw J., Wilkinson S. Care of the Dying: A Pathway to Excellence. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2003.

Goadsby P.J. Advances in the understanding of headache. Br. Med. Bull.. 2005;73:83-92.

Högestätt E.D., Jonsson B.A., Ermund A., et al. Conversion on acetaminophen to the bioactive N-acylphenolamine AM404 via fatty acid hydrolase-dependent arachadonic acid conjugation in the nervous system. J. Biol. Chem.. 2005;280:405-412.

Holden J.E., Jeong Y., Forrest J.M. The endogenous opioid system and clinical pain management. AACN Clin. Issues. 2005;16:291-301.

Hyllested M., Jones S., Pedersen J.L., et al. Comparative effect of paracetamol, NSAIDs or their combination in postoperative pain management: a qualitative review. Br. J. Anaesth.. 2002;88:199-214.

Kehlet H., Rung G.W., Callesen T. Postoperative opioid analgesia: time for a reconsideration? J. Clin. Anesth.. 1996;8:441-445.

Li Wan Po A., Zhang W.Y. Systematic overview of co-proxamol to assess analgesic effects of addition of dextropropoxyphene to paracetamol. Br. Med. J.. 1997;315:1565-1571.

McQuay H., Carroll D., Jadad A.R., et al. Anticonvulsant drugs for management of pain: a systematic review. Br. Med. J.. 1995;311:1047-1052.

McQuay H.J., Tramer M., Nye B., et al. A systematic review of antidepressants in neuropathic pain. Pain. 1996;68:217-227.

Medicines and Healthcare Regulatory Agency. Updated safety information for non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs). Available at http://www.mhra.gov.uk/NewsCentre/Pressreleases/CON2025039, 2006.

Mercadante S. Ketamine in cancer pain: an update. Palliat. Med.. 1996;10:225-230.

Moore, R.A., Wiffen, P.J., Derry, S., McQuay, H.J. Gabapentin for chronic neuropathic pain and fibromyalgia in adults. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews 2011, Issue 3. Art. No.: CD007938. DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD007938.pub2.

National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence. Low back pain. Early management of persistent non-specific low back pain, Clinical Guideline 88. London: NICE. 2009. Available at http://www.nice.org.uk/nicemedia/pdf/CG88NICEGuideline.pdf

National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence. Neuropathic pain: the pharmacological management of neuropathic pain in adults in non-specialist setting, Clinical Guideline 96. London: NICE. 2010. Available at http://www.nice.org.uk/nicemedia/live/12948/47949/47949.pdf

Scottish Intercollegiate Guidelines Network. Control of pain in adults with cancer. Edinburgh: SIGN; 2008. Available at http://www.sign.ac.uk/pdf/SIGN106.pdf

Sindrup S.H., Jensen T.S. Efficacy of pharmacological treatments of neuropathic pain: an update and effect related to mechanism of drug action. Pain. 1999;83:389-400.

Sindrup S.H., Otto M., Finnerup N.B., et al. Antidepressants in the treatment of neuropathic pain. Basic Clin. Pharmacol. Toxicol.. 2005;96:399-409.

Tjolsen A., Lund A., Hole K. Antinociceptive effect of paracetamol in rats is partly dependent on spinal serotonergic systems. Eur. J. Pharmacol.. 1991;193:193-201.

Thompson D.R. Narcotic analgesic effects on the sphincter of Oddi: a review of the data and therapeutic implications in treating pancreatitis. Am. J. Gastroenterol.. 2001;96:1266-1272.

van Wijck A.J., Opstelten W., Moons K.G., et al. The PINE study of epidural steroids and local anaesthetics to prevent postherpetic neuralgia: a randomised controlled trial. Lancet. 2006;367:219-224.

Woolf C.J. Pain: moving from symptom control toward mechanism-specific pharmacologic management. Ann. Intern. Med.. 2004;140:441-451.