Overview of Vasculitis

Published on 21/06/2015 by admin

Filed under Cardiovascular

Last modified 22/04/2025

Print this page

rate 1 star rate 2 star rate 3 star rate 4 star rate 5 star
Your rating: none, Average: 2 (2 votes)

This article have been viewed 2963 times

Chapter 41 Overview of Vasculitis

The vasculitides are a group of rare diseases linked by the pathological consequences of vascular inflammation, including bleeding, ischemia, and infarction of downstream organs (Box 41-1). However, the clinical spectrum of these diseases is wide ranging and includes a myriad of clinical and pathological findings. Not all disease phenotypes that occur in the vasculitides are due to true “vasculitis” (i.e., inflammation of vascular structures). Some damage in vasculitis is due to nonvascular inflammation. For example, arthritis, uveitis, and pulmonary nodules are parts of different vasculitides but are not due to interruption of vascular flow. The pathophysiology of vasculitis is covered in Chapter 9 and in individual chapters on Takayasu’s arteritis (TA) (Chapter 42), giant cell arteritis (GCA; Chapter 43), and Kawasaki disease (Chapter 45).

The diseases outlined in this chapter are rare, and all are considered “orphan” diseases, with fewer than 200,000 cases in the United States at any time. As with most rare diseases, few well-controlled clinical treatment trials have been performed for this group of disorders. Much of the clinical investigation stems from studies of patient cohorts at large referral centers. In the past 2 decades, however, increasing international cooperation among vasculitis centers has resulted in several important randomized controlled treatment trials that have had significant impacts on the care and management of patients with vasculitis. Similarly, advances in diagnostic imaging and laboratory testing have improved clinicians’ ability to diagnose and evaluate patients with vasculitis.

This chapter reviews the major types of vasculitis, discusses evaluation of suspected cases of vasculitis, and outlines approaches to treatment and management of these disorders. There is a focus on differentiating inflammatory from noninflammatory disease as it relates to the types of patients physicians specializing in vascular medicine are likely to encounter in a consultative practice (Table 41-1). The newest advances in diagnosis and treatment are also reviewed briefly.

Classification of Vasculitis

The classification and nomenclature of vasculitis can be unnecessarily confusing. The most important first step in approaching these disorders is for clinicians to consider the possibility of “some sort of vasculitis” and, once clinical proof is found, to narrow down the specific type. Nevertheless, knowledge of the classification criteria is quite useful when considering treatment and clinical follow-up. Establishing a treatment plan for a case of vasculitis relies on both an understanding of the prognosis of a specific type and applying results of clinical trials that always include patients who meet specific classification criteria. For example, a patient with arthritis, purpura, and abdominal pain might well be treated with glucocorticoids alone if believed to have Henoch-Schönlein Purpura HSP, but would also receive an additional immunosuppressive drug (e.g., methotrexate, cyclophosphamide) if determined to have granulomatosis with polyangiitis (GPA [Wegener’s]). Similarly, the nature of follow-up visits, examinations, and subsequent evaluations are also heavily influenced by the specific type of vasculitis. For example, new-onset hemoptysis in a patient believed to be in remission after treatment for GCA would be concerning for infection or malignancy, whereas the same finding in a patient with GPA would usually prompt immediate reinstitution of high-dose glucocorticoids to treat potential alveolar hemorrhage while further evaluations, including for infection, are put in place.

Two major classification systems for vasculitis exist: the American College of Rheumatology (ACR) system1 and the Chapel Hill Consensus Conference definitions.2 These systems were not meant to be strictly diagnostic systems, but rather classification systems. These are definitions to apply to established vasculitis and differentiate one vasculitis from another. The main use of these systems has been for clinical trials and other types of clinical research. Nevertheless, these systems have been adapted for use by clinicians as helpful guides to practice. Not all types of vasculitis are included in the ACR or Chapel Hill systems; both are currently undergoing reevaluation and revision.3

The practice of differentiating among the inflammatory vasculitides by associated diagnostic antibodies is at this time limited to use of antineutrophil cytoplasmic antibodies (ANCAs). Specifically, many authors refer to ANCA-associated vasculitis, which includes GPA, microscopic polyangiitis (MPA), renal-limited pauci-immune glomerulonephritis, and the Churg-Strauss’ syndrome (CSS). Although it is convenient to refer to these related diseases as “ANCA-associated” vasculitis, it is important to realize that patients may have any of these diseases and still test negative for the presence of ANCA.

Perhaps the simplest method of sorting out the vasculitides, albeit also incomplete and not fully accurate, is to list them according to the size of artery (predominantly but not necessarily exclusively) involved (see Box 41-1). This results in considering small-vessel, medium-vessel, and large-vessel vasculitides. This system, although not applied for clinical trials or even clinically for treatment purposes, is an easy one to use as a first approach to describing the diseases and their major manifestations, and is used to outline the descriptions of the vasculitides in this chapter. However, when specific diseases and results of treatment trials are mentioned, the ACR and Chapel Hill Consensus systems are applied.

Large-Vessel Vasculitis

The large-vessel vasculitides are disorders in which the aorta and its main branches are affected, including the subclavian, carotid, vertebral, renal, mesenteric, and iliac arteries4 (Fig. 41-1). Because such vessels are so frequently involved in noninflammatory vascular diseases, and patients with these diseases are frequently encountered by specialists in vascular medicine, these disorders are particularly highlighted in this textbook. Also included are individual chapters on TA (Chapter 42), giant cell (temporal) arteritis (Chapter 43), and Kawasaki disease (Chapter 45). The vasculitides involving large arteries are briefly described in this section, but it is important to realize that many of them also involve smaller-sized vessels.

Giant Cell Arteritis

Giant-cell arteritis, also commonly known as temporal arteritis and described in detail in Chapter 43, is the most common of the idiopathic vasculitides.4,5 Giant-cell arteritis affects men and women aged 50 and older but is especially prevalent after age 70. Many vascular and systemic manifestations are seen in this disease. Vascular disease occurs in the aorta and its branches, with predilection for the branches of the carotid arteries, especially the ophthalmic artery, with resulting headaches, jaw claudication, and visual impairment. Rapid-onset irreversible monocular blindness is the most feared complication, but stroke, limb ischemia, and aortic disease can occur, the latter more common than generally appreciated, especially several years after the initial presentation. Common systemic manifestations include fever, anemia, proximal arthralgias (polymyalgia rheumatica), and fatigue. Diagnosis is often established on finding arteritis on temporal artery biopsy, but this is not required for a diagnosis. Elevated acute phase reactants are seen in 90% of cases. Treatment with high-dose glucocorticoids is highly effective but often results in significant drug-related morbidity.

Takayasu’s Arteritis

Takayasu’s arteritis, described in detail in Chapter 42, is a vasculitis that involves the aorta and all its major branches and the pulmonary arteries, including but not limited to the brachiocephalic, carotid, vertebral, subclavian, renal, femoral, and coronary arteries. This disease often results in stenoses, occlusions, and ischemic damage to end organs and limbs.4,6 Stroke, myocardial infarction (MI), limb claudication, and severe renovascular hypertension are all complications well known to occur in this disease. It is mostly seen in women and usually first presents clinically in the second or third decade, but it can occur at older ages. Many patients have associated systemic symptoms of fever, arthralgias, and malaise. The disease has a waxing and waning course, and delay in diagnosis is common. Treatment involves glucocorticoids in almost all patients and often the addition of immunosuppressive medications. Surgical bypass procedures may be necessary in some cases.

Behçet’s Disease

Behçet’s disease is a systemic inflammatory disease with multiple mucocutaneous manifestations, especially including genital and oral ulcers and often severe sight-threatening inflammatory eye disease.7 Arthritis, gastrointestinal disease (including mucosal lesions), epididymitis, and secondary amyloidosis can also occur. Although its prevalence is markedly increased in countries in the Eastern Mediterranean, Middle East, and East Asia and descendents of people from these regions, Behçet’s disease is found in populations worldwide.

Vasculitis occurs in up to one third of patients with Behçet’s disease and is unique among the inflammatory vasculitides for the relatively common clinical involvement of venous disease. Both arterial and venous manifestations may occur in the same patients. Venous involvement includes superficial phlebitis, varices, and thromboses of deep veins, vena cava, cerebral sinuses, and other major veins.

The arterial lesions in Behçet’s disease are often in large vessels and frequently result in aneurysms, stenoses, or rupture. The most common sites of arteritis are the aorta and its branches and the pulmonary arteries; however, Behçet’s disease may also involve medium and small vessels.

Behçet’s disease can involve a huge range of different types of histopathologies, consistent with the protean disease manifestations. The oral and genital ulcers do not have specific pathognomonic features. Similarly, biopsy specimens of the gastrointestinal lesions cannot differentiate Behçet’s disease from inflammatory bowel disease. Although the vascular lesions can include large and small arteries as well as veins, these lesions are similar to those of other vasculitides.

Treatment of Behçet’s disease varies with the manifestation being addressed and may range from colchicine and topical glucocorticoids for aphthous ulcers to large doses of glucocorticoids for many problems including mucocutaneous, vascular, and eye lesions. The uveitis is treated with long-term immunosuppressive agents, including cyclosporine, azathioprine, chlorambucil, and cyclophosphamide. Inhibitors of tumor necrosis factor (TNF)-α are now also used to treat this disorder. Many treatment protocols are based on expert opinion, but in recent years an increasing number of controlled clinical trials have been performed, especially involving eye disease. Behçet’s disease can be a highly aggressive form of vasculitis that frequently results in significant morbidity and mortality.

Relapsing Polychondritis

Relapsing polychondritis is a rare connective tissue disease that predominantly affects the cartilaginous structures of the eyes, ears, nose, and subglottis/trachea, but may also affect a wide variety of other organ systems and is associated with vasculitis, especially of large vessels.8 The cardinal feature of polychondritis is auriculitis, inflammation of the outer ear, usually sparing the noncartilaginous lobe. Auriculitis, which is also a feature of GPA and CSS but virtually of no other diseases, is readily treated with glucocorticoids and can result in disfigurement if allowed to go untreated. Other common manifestations include inflammatory eye disease that can lead to blindness, destruction of nasal cartilage leading to internal derangement and external disfigurement, sensorineural hearing loss and vertigo, arthritis, and subglottic inflammation with resulting stenosis, a life-threatening condition. Each of these features can also be seen in GPA, although auriculitis is rare in this disease, and relapsing polychondritis is not associated with parenchymal pulmonary manifestations.

The vasculitis seen in relapsing polychondritis can affect vessels of any size, but large-vessel vasculitis is the most common. Aortitis with associated aortic valvular dysfunction and accompanied by thoracic or abdominal aortic aneurysms is fairly common and can lead to heart failure, aneurysmal rupture or dissection, and involvement of branch arteries. Small-vessel disease can affect nerves, eyes, kidneys, and other systems.

The histopathology of relapsing polychondritis includes destructive inflammation of various types of cartilage, necrotizing aortitis, vasculitis in small vessels (e.g., skin, glomeruli), and direct inflammatory infiltration of eye structures, heart valves, pericardium, skin, and other tissues.

Relapsing polychondritis has been associated with various other primary autoimmune diseases, such as inflammatory bowel disease, lupus, and others. The rarity of this syndrome has precluded comprehensive research that might help both better differentiate cases from other conditions and learn more about the pathophysiology. Treatment almost always involves systemic glucocorticoids, and immunosuppressive agents are frequently prescribed for this often rapidly progressive disease.

Cogan’s Syndrome

Cogan’s syndrome is a rare disorder characterized by inflammatory eye and inner ear/vestibular disease that can also involve inflammatory vasculitis.9 It is a disease of young adults, usually first affecting patients before age 40, although both children and older patients have also been affected.

The characteristic clinical manifestations of Cogan’s syndrome are interstitial keratitis, sensorineural hearing loss, and vestibulatory dysfunction. Although interstitial keratitis is the most common eye problem in Cogan’s syndrome, uveitis, scleritis, and many other types of ophthalmological inflammation can occur. The eye and ear damage is often permanent and can be quite debilitating. The combination of inflammatory eye disease and inner ear problems is required for a diagnosis of Cogan’s syndrome, but these findings can occur in other diseases as well, such as infections, malignancies, sarcoidosis, and various autoimmune diseases, including other vasculitides (e.g., GPA, relapsing polychondritis, Behçet’s disease). Other organ systems are less commonly involved.

Vasculitis occurs in up to 15% of patients with Cogan’s syndrome and is mostly large-vessel disease, with some medium-vessel manifestations reported. The large-vessel disease in Cogan’s syndrome is similar to that of TA and includes aortitis with aortic insufficiency, stenoses of the carotid and subclavian and other aortic branch arteries, and even coronary artery disease (CAD). Treatment of Cogan’s syndrome includes both glucocorticoids and immunosuppressive drugs, appropriate rehabilitation (e.g., vestibular retraining), surgical correction of eye damage, and use of hearing aides or surgical correction of hearing loss.

Idiopathic Aortitis

Aortitis may be found in the absence of any other manifestations of a systemic inflammatory disease.1012 These cases often come to the attention of vascular medicine specialists when patients undergoing surgical repair of aortic aneurysms and dissections are found to have inflammation consistent with aortitis on pathological specimens. Autopsies and studies of large numbers of surgical specimens have demonstrated that noninfectious aortitis occurs in 4% to 15% of cases. Although on detailed investigation, many of these patients are retrospectively found to have had evidence of GCA, TA, relapsing polychondritis, GPA, or another definable vasculitis, it is common among these cases to find no evidence of more systemic inflammatory disease. The majority of cases of so-called idiopathic aortitis involve thoracic lesions, in contrast to the overall predominance of abdominal aortic lesions for noninflammatory disease.

It is possible that cases of isolated inflammatory aortic aneurysms will be increasingly identified earlier as magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) technology continues to improve and helps demonstrate inflammation in the arterial wall. It can, however, be difficult to differentiate inflammation due to true idiopathic aortitis and vasculitis from the vascular and periaortic inflammations seen in association with atherosclerotic disease. Currently, in the absence of pathological specimens or other evidence of a vasculitis, MRI alone is not diagnostic for inflammation. The emergence of positron emission tomography (PET) scanning for large-vessel disease may also help in the evaluation of such patients.

The approach to treatment of idiopathic aortitis is unclear; many patients never develop other findings of vasculitis. However, new aneurysms and significant vascular disease do occur in some cases.11 Comprehensive evaluation of evidence of systemic disease is necessary and should include a detailed physical examination, diagnostic imaging, laboratory studies, and other approaches outlined later in this chapter. Appropriate treatment should be given if inflammatory disease other than that seen in the surgical specimen is found, but not all patients require glucocorticoids, especially in the postoperative period. Furthermore, regular follow-up of such patients by a specialist knowledgeable about vasculitis is imperative because lesions may develop subtly and only years after the initial pathological diagnosis is made.

Medium-Vessel Vasculitis

Among the inflammatory vasculitides, the medium-vessel diseases have the greatest variety of clinical manifestations, which result from the broad range of vessel sizes actually involved in the process. As stated earlier, classifying the vasculitides by affected vessel size can be problematic, but particularly with the medium-vessel disorders.

Specialists in vascular medicine need to be aware of protean presentations of active medium-vessel disease and the lasting damage they can cause. As with large-vessel disease, these disorders can mimic noninflammatory cardiac, renal, cerebral, and other vascular problems. This fascinating set of diseases comprises the vasculitides for which the highest quality and quantity of clinical trial data are available to help guide therapy.

Polyarteritis Nodosa

Polyarteritis nodosa (PAN) is among the “purer” vasculitides in that most of its manifestations are due to true vascular inflammation.13 With the identification of other types of vasculitis, the spectrum of what is now diagnosed as PAN has narrowed over the past 50 years. Although characterized as a medium-vessel disease, PAN may also involve small vessels such as those in the skin. Polyarteritis nodosa frequently involves inflammation leading to multiple small aneurysms that often appear angiographically as a “string of beads.” Ischemia and infarction of kidneys, intestines, and skin are common in PAN, with arthralgias, myalgias, and fevers also frequently seen. Diagnosis is based on angiographic appearance (Fig. 41-2) or tissue pathology, often from surgical specimens such as a resected ischemic bowel segment. Interestingly, PAN in one subset of patients is associated with either hepatitis B or hepatitis C infections.13,14 Importantly, there is a difference between hepatitis C–associated PAN and hepatitis C–associated cryoglobulinemic vasculitis (CV, see later section). Cardiac manifestations of PAN are due to coronary arteritis or malignant hypertension (secondary to renal artery disease) and include myocardial ischemia, heart failure, and arrhythmias.

Treatment of PAN almost always involves high-dose glucocorticoids followed by a slow tapering of the dose. In more severe cases, an immunosuppressive agent is added. Hepatitis-associated PAN is now often treated with short courses of glucocorticoids and prolonged courses of antiviral agents. The rate of disease relapse in PAN is lower than that for many other types of vasculitis, and this relatively good prognosis is another important factor to take into consideration when deciding on a therapeutic regimen. Due to the rarity of the disease, controlled clinical trials for PAN are unlikely to occur; treatment is based on case series and expert opinion.

Granulomatosis with Polyangiitis (Wegener’s)

Granulomatosis with polyangiitis is characterized by the triad of inflammation and destruction of tissue in the upper airway and sinuses (Fig. 41-3), lower airway (Fig. 41-4), and kidneys (Fig. 41-5), as well as the development of ANCAs.15,16 Approximately 70% of patients with GPA are positive for ANCA at diagnosis, although some will develop the antibodies later in the course of their illness. Among patients with GPA and glomerulonephritis, more than 90% are positive for ANCA. Although the combination of these features is common in GPA, many patients present with only a subset of these findings. Granulomatosis with polyangiitis also frequently involves many other organ systems. The upper airway lesions include destructive rhinitis, often leading to nasal bridge collapse and the “saddle nose” deformity, sinusitis, and subglottic inflammation that can lead to life-threatening tracheal stenosis. The most severe form of pulmonary disease in GPA is alveolar hemorrhage, and this is a common cause of early death. Other common pulmonary lesions include nodules, with or without cavitation, and tracheobronchitis. Other common features of GPA are retroorbital pseudotumor with resulting proptosis, conductive and sensorineural hearing loss, mononeuritis multiplex, arthritis, and purpura. Peripheral vascular involvement with gangrene is seen in GPA and may be the presenting feature (Fig. 41-6).

Inflammatory cardiac disease is rare in GPA but can include myocarditis and pericarditis. Aortic or large-vessel involvement in GPA is extremely uncommon.

Venous thromboses, including both deep vein thromboses (DVTs) and pulmonary emboli (PEs), occur frequently in GPA and may be associated with active disease.17,18 Although some of the pathology in GPA is indeed granulomatous with histiocytes, piecemeal necrosis, and occasional giant cells and eosinophils, other manifestations of inflammation are also seen in the disease. True vasculitis occurs and includes capillaritis. The renal disease of GPA is identical to other ANCA-positive diseases, and the pathology is that of rapidly progressive glomerulonephritis.

Untreated, GPA most often leads to death or serious damage.19 Glucocorticoids are always used for treatment, but the prognosis of GPA changed considerably when a protocol using cyclophosphamide was introduced in the 1970s at the National Institutes of Health (NIH). The morbidity and mortality of GPA was markedly improved by cytotoxic therapy: 1-year mortality changed from more than 80% to less than 20%.16,19,20 However, serious side effects are common with the use of cyclophosphamide, and the rate of recurrent disease in GPA after therapy is above 50%. In recent years, new treatment protocols have been tested in open and controlled trials that incorporate less toxic immunosuppressive drugs, including methotrexate and azathioprine.2123 Two multicentered randomized controlled trials (RCTs) have demonstrated that treatment with rituximab, a monoclonal antibody directed against the CD20 receptor on B cells, was equivalent to cyclophosphamide for induction of remission in ANCA-associated vasculitis (GPA and MPA).24,25 In 2011, the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) approved rituximab for the treatment of GPA and MPA, and it has quickly become an established alternative to cyclophosphamide.

Microscopic Polyangiitis

With the publication of the Chapel Hill Consensus Conference classification system, recognition of MPA as a separate entity gained acceptance.2,13 Microscopic polyangiitis is a mostly small- to medium-vessel ANCA-associated vasculitis with manifestations that strongly overlap with GPA. Its key features include glomerulonephritis, alveolar hemorrhage, skin lesions, and mononeuritis multiplex, but many other organ systems may be involved as well. Unlike GPA, the pathology of MPA is nongranulomatous and does not involve the type of nonvascular disease seen in GPA or CSS. The glomerulonephritis of MPA is identical to that seen in GPA. Most patients with MPA are positive for ANCA, and the predominant ANCA antigen specificity is myeloperoxidase. Cardiac manifestations of MPA are uncommon, but peripheral artery disease (PAD) and gangrene are seen and may be confused with noninflammatory vascular disease. Microscopic polyangiitis should be differentiated from classic PAN. Polyarteritis nodosa is more of a medium-vessel disease and does not include glomerulonephritis or pulmonary capillaritis. Microscopic polyangiitis does not produce the microaneurysms seen in PAN. Treatment of MPA is essentially identical to that for GPA.

Churg-Strauss’ Syndrome

Churg-Strauss’ syndrome, also known as allergic granulomatous angiitis, is a rare disease characterized by the triad of asthma, pulmonary infiltrates, and hypereosinophilia.26,27 Churg-Strauss’ syndrome can, however, involve almost all the clinical features seen in GPA, including the presence of ANCA in some cases (30%-40%). As with GPA, much of the pathology seen in CSS is due to inflammation that is not “vasculitis” per se but is every bit as damaging as vascular inflammation. Tissue eosinophilia, although seen in other types of vasculitis, is particularly common in CSS and often striking. More than 90% of patients have asthma, often severe; the hypereosinophilia may be a marker of disease activity for some patients but is not always present. Pulmonary manifestations include dense infiltrates that rapidly clear with glucocorticoid therapy. Additionally, neuropathies—especially mononeuritis multiplex and gastrointestinal ischemia—are common features and quite damaging. Diagnosis is based on the combination of clinical findings, hypereosinophilia, and pathology specimens that often show granulomatous and eosinophilic inflammation.

Cardiovascular manifestations of CSS are fairly common and include myocarditis with resultant congestive heart failure (CHF) and pericarditis. Angina is rare in CSS. Cardiac involvement in CSS may be rapid in onset and fatal.

Glucocorticoids are the mainstay of treatment for CSS, but immunosuppressive agents are increasingly being used for more severe cases and to help wean patients from glucocorticoids. It is important to avoid overtreating the asthma component of the syndrome; asthma is not in itself a reason to start cytotoxic medications.

Kawasaki Disease

Kawasaki disease, a vasculitis of young children involving medium and small arteries, is a leading cause of acquired CAD in children.28 The disease manifests as a systemic illness with high fevers, conjunctival injection, erythematous oropharyngeal lesions, erythematous rashes and skin desquamation, lymphadenopathy, and other signs and symptoms. Cardiac involvement is frequent in Kawasaki disease and can result in long-term morbidity. Myocarditis and pericarditis are common and can be serious, but coronary artery aneurysms are the most feared aspect of the disease. Both panarteritis and granulomas can be seen in the vessels, with subsequent scarring and aneurysm formation. Treatment includes aspirin and intravenous immunoglobulin (IVIG); such regimens have been shown to markedly reduce the incidence of coronary complications. Kawasaki disease is described in detail in Chapter 45.

Small-Vessel Vasculitis

Cryoglobulinemic Vasculitis

Cryoglobulinemic vasculitis occurs when cryoglobulins, any of various types of Igs that precipitate from serum at temperatures below body temperature, induce an immune complex–mediated inflammatory process in any organ.30 Several types of cryoglobulins can occur, and cryoglobulinemia is subclassified based on the mix of IgG and IgM antibodies that make up the cryoglobulin portion of serum (the “cryocrit”), and whether the excess cryoproteins are polyclonal or monoclonal.

Cryoglobulinemic vasculitis was previously considered to be a quite rare phenomenon sometimes seen in chronic inflammatory diseases such as lupus or rheumatoid arthritis or associated with lymphoproliferative disorders. Once the association between hepatitis C infection and type 2 mixed CV was established, however, it became apparent that coincident with the worldwide rise in hepatitis C infection, CV has been increasingly identified as a cause of vasculitis. The vast majority of cases of CV now seen are associated with hepatitis C infection.

Major clinical manifestations of CV include cutaneous vasculitis (purpura), arthralgias, peripheral neuropathy, and nephropathy with associated renal insufficiency or nephrotic syndrome (or both). Cardiovascular manifestations of CV include Raynaud’s phenomenon, hypertension, and congestive heart failure. The hypertension in CV, which is often associated with renal disease, can be severe and lead to cardiac failure.

The histopathology of CV includes necrotizing vasculitis but may also involve Ig and complement deposition detected by immunofluorescence staining.

Treatment of CV is somewhat controversial. However, there is consensus that for patients with CV who are infected with hepatitis C virus, treatment with antiviral agents, even in the absence of significant liver disease, is important. For acute disease exacerbations or when antiviral therapy is not efficacious or possible, treatment may include glucocorticoids, cytotoxic agents, and plasmapheresis. There is increasing evidence that rituximab (ant-CD20 B cell depleting agent) is effective in treating CV.

Primary Angiitis of the Central Nervous System

Primary angiitis of the central nervous system (PACNS) is a quite rare necrotizing angiitis limited to the central nervous system (CNS).31,32 PACNS is frequently associated with subacute nonfocal neurological deficits and chronic meningitis, although strokes and hemorrhage can also be seen.

Diagnosis of PACNS necessitates first suspecting this rare disease. Conventional angiography may be helpful in identifying other entities, such as aneurysms and emboli, but is often not diagnostic for vasculitis for several reasons (Fig. 41-7). First, in older patients the endothelial changes of atherosclerosis may mimic those of vasculitis. Second, vasospasm can be confused with stenosis from either atherosclerosis or inflammation. Finally, the resolution of conventional angiography is such that small arteries are not well visualized, and thus many cases of vasculitis may be missed by this technique. Leptomeningeal biopsies or larger tissue samples from affected brain areas are often necessary to demonstrate PACNS and provide the level of evidence required to institute therapy. The histopathology is that of vasculitis, but granulomas and giant cells are not always seen; there may be no inflammation in the vasospastic variant. Tests of cerebrospinal fluid are often normal in patients with PACNS, but are important in evaluating patients for other conditions, especially infection or malignancy.

Experts in vascular medicine need to be aware of PACNS because it can easily be mistaken for atherosclerotic disease with multiple infarcts. PACNS is extremely rare, but the approach to treatment is quite different from atherosclerotic disease.

Treatment recommendations are based solely on case series and an incomplete understanding of the pathophysiology. PACNS is treated with glucocorticoids, with immunosuppressive agents often added.

It is imperative to differentiate PACNS from the increasingly recognized set of reversible cerebral vasoconstrictive syndromes (RCVS) previously referred to as benign PACNS33; RCVS is not a vasculitis. It is characterized by acute onset of severe headache (“thunderclap headaches”) and a focal neurological event. RCVS is treated with aggressive vasodilators, including calcium channel blockers, and strict avoidance of smoking and vasoconstricting drugs and substances, such as caffeine, cocaine, sympathomimetics, and serotonin receptor agonists (e.g., sumatriptan).

Drug-Induced Vasculitis

Many drugs or other toxins have been implicated as causing inflammatory vasculitis involving vessels of all sizes, especially small arteries. A full list of drugs considered to be causative for vasculitis and details regarding the clinical syndromes of drug-induced vasculitis are available in recent reviews.34,35 There is an interesting subset of patients with ANCA-associated vasculitis whose disease is caused by exposure to certain medications.36

The clinical manifestations of drug-induced vasculitis range from skin-only disease to widespread life-threatening multisystemic disease. No clinical, laboratory, or pathological findings differentiate drug-induced from other types of vasculitis. Given that agents from most classes of drugs have been implicated in vasculitis, it is important that clinicians consider the possible contribution of not only every medication the patient was taking at the time of clinical presentation but also medications, supplements, and illegal drugs used in the previous year. The temporal association between drug exposure and disease, combined with the pattern of illness and evidence for or against a different vasculitic process, are helpful in establishing a diagnosis of drug-induced vasculitis.

Management of drug-induced vasculitis always includes discontinuation of the putative causative agent when possible, but may also involve treatment with clinical observation alone, glucocorticoids, or immunosuppressive agents. Patients should be followed for an extended period, even after apparent disease resolution, to ensure the diagnosis of drug-induced vasculitis rather than waxing and waning idiopathic vasculitis.

Evaluation and Diagnosis of Possible Vasculitis

When evaluating cases of potential vasculitis, the clinician’s first challenge is to consider that one of these rare diseases is a possibility. Rather than quickly focusing on a specific type of vasculitis, it is best to consider first whether “some sort of” vasculitis is present and determine the specific type once more information becomes available. It is common that when clinicians are evaluating patients for vasculitis, they are also conducting parallel evaluations for nonvasculitic diseases, an appropriate approach given the rarity of vasculitis and the urgency to diagnose and treat conditions that mimic vasculitis, such as infection.

Due to the protean potential manifestations of the vasculitides, clinicians must be comprehensive in their evaluation of patients for possible inflammatory vascular disease. By “looking everywhere” at all organ systems with complete history-taking, physical examinations, and selective laboratory and radiographic diagnostic tests, evidence is sought for both the presence of vasculitis and the size of vessel involved. Finding the “worst” manifestation of any new diagnosis or flare of disease is important, but the goal is to determine the diagnosis of a vasculitis and ensure all manifestations are documented. Treatment protocols will differ based on extent of disease, and later assessment of response depends on accurate baseline evaluation of all features of disease.

With the exception of tissue pathology, no single test is fully diagnostic for vasculitis. A comprehensive initial medical evaluation including medical history, physical examination, and routine laboratory studies can provide most of the information clinicians need to either dismiss the diagnosis of vasculitis or focus on more specific diagnostic testing. Finally, clinicians must reconsider a diagnosis of vasculitis or consider a coexisting problem when either the clinical course changes or treatment response is not characteristic for vasculitis.

Physical Examination

A full physical examination is required whenever a patient is evaluated for potential vasculitis, and several examination findings should always prompt consideration of vasculitis in any patient. Blood pressure should be measured in both arms for discrepancies. Obtaining pressures in the legs may be appropriate if lower-extremity stenoses are suspected. Hypertension may result from renal artery stenoses (RAS) from vasculitis, and similar physiology occurs with some tight suprarenal aortic stenoses. A full examination of bilateral pulses should include radial, ulnar, brachial, carotid, femoral, popliteal, posterior tibial, and dorsalis pedis pulses. Bruits should be listened for over the aorta and the carotid, femoral, axillary, subclavian, and renal arteries. Presence of blood pressure discrepancies, absent pulses, or arterial bruits are each highly specific for major arterial disease but are not highly sensitive for major arterial lesions in large-vessel vasculitis.37

Careful examination of skin and mucosal surfaces can reveal many clues to vasculitis. Although palpable purpura is the classic vasculitis skin lesion, not all purpura is vasculitis, and not all skin vasculitis manifests as purpura. Macular lesions, both flat and raised, as well as bullae and nonerythematous lesions, can all occur in vasculitis. Livedo reticularis may be a clue to vasculitis or vasospasm. One should examine the patient for oral or genital aphthous ulcers. Extremity cyanosis and pallor may be seen and may be variable depending on the ambient temperature and limb positioning. Ulcerations and crusting should be sought in the nasopharynx. Nailfold capillary changes can be seen on bedside microscopic examination with an ophthalmoscope. Signs of capillary fragility, especially over sites of blood pressure cuff or tourniquet application, may be seen.

The rest of a full physical examination is also essential in evaluating for vasculitis. Lung examination may reveal any of the many abnormalities commonly seen in vasculitis, including rhonchi, pleural rubs, dullness due to effusions, and wheezing. Careful cardiac auscultation might reveal evidence of aortic regurgitation, as seen in aortitis or pericardial rubs. Gross inspection of the eyes may reveal signs of inflammation, and funduscopic examinations may show retinal pallor or other signs of ischemia. A full ophthalmological examination including slit lamp is necessary for any patient suspected of vasculitis with eye symptoms. A full joint examination may reveal even asymptomatic effusions. Detailed neurological examination is essential; subtle cranial and peripheral neuropathies often go unnoticed by both patients and physicians, but are clues to severe disease.

Laboratory Studies

Antineutrophil cytoplasmic autoantibodies testing

The discovery of ANCAs and their association with GPA, microscopic polyangiitis, CSS, and renal-only pauci-immune glomerulonephritis was extremely important in the evolution of diagnostic testing for vasculitis.38 ANCA testing, when performed properly, is highly specific for these syndromes, and in the correct clinical setting may be the last piece of data necessary to establish a diagnosis, even in the absence of a tissue biopsy. Additionally, the finding of a positive test for ANCA in a patient with already established vasculitis essentially narrows the diagnosis to one of four ANCA-associated diseases.

Currently, the methodology for conducting ANCA testing is not standardized, which leads to problems with reliability and interpretation of test results. At a minimum, a laboratory should perform both immunofluorescence testing to identify the cytoplasmic (“C”) ANCA pattern or perinuclear (“P”) pattern, as well as conduct enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) testing for antibodies to proteinase 3 (anti-PR3) and antibodies to myeloperoxidase (anti-MPO). Antigen-specific ELISA tests are less prone to false-positive results (for the diagnosis of vasculitis) than the somewhat subjective immunofluorescence tests. Positive ANCA testing by the combined presence of C-pattern/anti-PR3 or P-pattern/ anti-MPO is extremely specific for vasculitis, with other types of ANCA not helpful diagnostically.

Specificity of properly performed ANCA testing is better than 90% and may be closer to 99% in certain laboratories.38,39 Sensitivity of ANCA testing varies with the type of disease and clinical manifestations. Although more than 90% of patients with GPA who have renal involvement are ANCA positive, this rate drops to about 70% for patients without renal disease. Most patients with MPA and renal-limited pauci-immune glomerulonephritis are ANCA positive, but the rate of ANCA positivity among patients with CSS varies in the literature from 40% to 80%. Thus, although ANCA is highly specific for vasculitis when present, a negative test by no means excludes the diagnosis.

Diagnostic Vascular Imaging

Radiographic assessment of vascular structures has long been an important tool for diagnosing patients with vasculitis. This is especially true when medium and large vessels are involved because they are much more likely to be visualized by the techniques available.40 Although small- and even medium-sized arteries can often be seen on diagnostic biopsies or surgical specimens, large vessels are not usually amenable to tissue biopsy. Thus diagnostic imaging is crucial to assessment and management of patients with large-vessel vasculitis. The two great challenges inherent in interpretation of imaging of large vessels are (1) differentiating inflammatory disease from atherosclerotic disease and (2) trying to determine whether vascular lesions represent “active” disease. In recent years, interest in large-vessel vascular imaging has greatly increased as investigators and clinicians working in vasculitis strive to properly incorporate advances in various radiological modalities into practice. Imaging of organs and tissues other than arteries themselves is of obvious benefit for specific syndromes to help understand the extent of disease, facilitate choice of tissue biopsy, and rule out other pathology.

Specialists in vascular medicine need to be aware of the capabilities and limitations of various modalities for imaging the vascular system and differentiating atherosclerotic from inflammatory disease. Vascular imaging is much more commonly obtained to evaluate suspected atherosclerotic or structural disease, and thus it is vital that inflammatory disease is recognized, even when it is not expected. The increased recognition that atherosclerosis may have an inflammatory component and that vasculitis can result in some changes seen in atherosclerosis makes this differentiation even more challenging. Marked differences in treatment and prognosis for these different disorders make continued cooperative work by experts in cardiology, rheumatology, radiology, vascular surgery, and other specialties essential in evaluating patients and interpreting imaging data. The following sections summarize the progress to date in using various imaging modalities for evaluating vascular disease in the inflammatory vasculitides.

Conventional angiography

Conventional angiography with intravascular injection of radiocontrast dye remains the gold standard for detecting stenoses and aneurysms in medium and large arteries and in diagnosing patients with vasculitis, especially TA and PAN. It is important to ask radiologists to view the distal runoffs of arteries beyond the trunk; diagnostic and critical lesions more distally (e.g., axillary artery) may be missed by undue concentration on the proximal vessels. Additional advantages to conventional angiography include the ability to measure intraarterial blood pressure directly. Such pressure readings are especially important when caring for patients with subclavian or proximal aortic stenoses, where peripheral pressure readings may be inaccurate. Finally, conventional angiography is the only current imaging modality that assists catheter-based intervention, including angioplasty and stent placement.

There are several problems with and limitations to conventional angiography for evaluation of potential vasculitis. The direct toxicities of the contrast dye have the potential for hypersensitivity reactions, renal insufficiency, and volume overload. Catheters can potentially cause vascular injury. The resolution of conventional angiography is limited, and most small-vessel disease, such as in the brain or mesentery, is not well imaged by this technique. Additionally, serial studies by conventional angiography, although sometimes necessary, are impractical, incur additive toxicity, and are thus not routinely performed to monitor patients. Finally, conventional angiography does not provide any information about the biological state of the arterial wall and therefore, except with serial images, cannot determine disease activity.

Magnetic resonance imaging

The use of MRI to help in the diagnosis and management of vasculitis continues to gain acceptance rapidly, although there are few properly done studies on the reliability of MRI for these purposes. Magnetic resonance imaging and magnetic resonance angiography (MRA) provide detailed information on luminal structures, arterial wall thickness and edema, tissue enhancement (by gadolinium contrast), and blood flow for large and some medium vessels. These structural measures have been proposed as useful in determining vasculitis disease activity. Magnetic resonance imaging and MRA can be performed repeatedly with little risk to the patient and can thus provide important serial data. The technology for magnetic resonance (MR) continues to improve, and it is anticipated that the reliability and breadth of information it provides in evaluating patients with vasculitis will continue to increase substantially in the next few years, especially for large-vessel pathology.

Several problems remain in the use of MR for diagnosing and following patients with vasculitis. First, not all vascular structures are easily imaged, and false-positive scans due to problems with imaging artifact (and possibly other reasons) do occur. Second, neither the protocols for data acquisition nor the methods of image interpretation are standardized, making comparison of research data and studies from different institutions or even different machines problematic. The specificity of MR as a disease activity measure remains controversial. Unlike conventional angiography, MR does not allow for pressure readings or catheter-based interventions. Finally, MR is currently not helpful for small- or even most medium-vessel disease, although resolution is improving.

Tissue Biopsy

Given the need to often exclude infection, malignancy, or other processes, as well as the need for immunosuppressive medications for vasculitis, biopsy evidence is often crucial, and empirical therapy is strongly discouraged. With the exception of some cases of large-vessel vasculitis and some situations in patients with ANCA-positive disease, tissue biopsy is usually necessary to establish a firm diagnosis of vasculitis.

A temporal artery biopsy is almost always appropriate when GCA is a consideration, even if there are no cranial symptoms. A positive biopsy is such strong evidence for GCA that although a negative temporal artery biopsy does not exclude the diagnosis, a second contralateral biopsy is sometimes advised if the initial specimen is nondiagnostic.

For large-vessel diseases other than GCA, a vessel biopsy is almost never obtained because a medium- to full-thickness biopsy of the aorta or its main branches has obvious morbidity. Obtaining surgical specimens during bypass procedures or biopsies under highly controlled situations such as during aortic valve or graft surgery should, however, be considered when a diagnosis of large-vessel disease has not yet been established or when disease activity status is unclear.

For the other vasculitides, it is usually preferred to obtain a biopsy from the most accessible tissue. Skin biopsies are simple, have low risk of morbidity, and can be instrumental in diagnosis. Too often, purpuric lesions are assumed to be vasculitis, and biopsies not performed. Additionally, skin biopsies can be examined for evidence of embolic, thrombotic, or infectious diseases.

In the proper setting, biopsies of kidneys or lungs involve moderate risks but can be of high yield, whereas biopsies of other tissues (e.g., sinus mucosa, nerve, myocardium) are lower risk but also have lower diagnostic yields. Biopsies of other organs, such as intestine and liver, offer low yields and higher risks but may be appropriate, especially during a surgical procedure, in certain circumstances.

Treatment of Vasculitis

The goals of treatment for inflammatory vasculitis are to stop the active inflammation and prevent permanent damage. Unlike many other systemic inflammatory diseases, true clinical remission is not only possible in many cases of vasculitis but should be the goal of treatment. Thus, protocols are increasingly being referred to as involving either “remission induction” or “remission maintenance” treatments. The mainstays of therapy for vasculitis remain glucocorticoids and various immunosuppressive drugs. Treatment protocols are tailored to the specific type of vasculitis and the extent of disease. Clinical trial data are increasingly available to guide treatment for GPA, microscopic polyangiitis, Kawasaki disease, and GCA, whereas other diseases rely on either case series for guidance or extrapolated data from studies in related, but not identical, vasculitides. Box 41-2 outlines the treatments used for patients with inflammatory vasculitis.

Ensuring long-term follow-up of patients with inflammatory vasculitis is extremely important. Relapse of vasculitis, even after complete remission, is quite common in many forms, including both large- and small-vessel diseases. Relapse may occur weeks to years from the time of clinical remission and manifest with different clinical findings than those seen on initial presentation. For example, aortic aneurysms may be seen in patients with GCA years after the patient was believed to be in “remission.” Other manifestations may also occur, even in the absence of clinical symptoms, and are more likely missed when patients are believed to be “cured” of their vasculitis. For example, inadequate surveillance may allow renal insufficiency in patients with ANCA-associated vasculitis to go undetected until end-stage renal failure has occurred.

Medical Therapies for Vasculitis

Medical management of patients with vasculitis should only be directed by physicians familiar with both the use of chronic immunosuppressive agents and the clinical presentation and management of vasculitis. The acute and chronic toxicities of these drugs should not be underestimated and can result in significant morbidity. Treatment protocols are beyond the scope of this chapter, but the most commonly used medications for vasculitis are briefly outlined. Many different agents have been used for vasculitis (see Box 41-2).

Glucocorticoids are used for almost all patients with almost all types of vasculitis during the acute presentation or during flares. They have a rapid onset of action, and high doses often stabilize patients even with severe manifestations such as alveolar hemorrhage or glomerulonephritis. The toxicities of glucocorticoids, especially with prolonged use, are serious and common and include weight gain, osteoporosis, osteonecrosis, glucose intolerance, Cushingoid habitus, adrenal suppression, hypertension, mood disturbances, frank psychosis, cataracts, glaucoma, and many others (IV).

Immunosuppressive drugs are often used in conjunction with glucocorticoids, either to provide more effective therapy and induce a remission or to act as “steroid-sparing” drugs, allowing for safe tapering of the glucocorticoids.

Cyclophosphamide is widely considered the most effective agent for inducing and maintaining remission in various types of vasculitis.16 The introduction of cyclophosphamide-based therapy changed the prognosis of many of these diseases. Although cyclophosphamide is extremely effective, its multiple toxicities are severe and include cytopenias, especially neutropenia with associated infections, gonadal failure, teratogenicity, hemorrhagic cystitis, transitional cell carcinoma of the bladder, myelodysplasia, mucositis, hair loss, and others. Controversy exists about the best route of administration for cyclophosphamide, orally or intravenously (IV).

Multiple alternative agents have been tested and proposed to limit use of cyclophosphamide. Methotrexate, taken orally or intramuscularly (IM) weekly, has demonstrated efficacy as both a remission-induction agent and remission-maintenance agent for GPA and is used for both purposes for multiple vasculitides.41 The toxicities of methotrexate include cytopenias, gastrointestinal upset, oral ulcers, teratogenicity, and hepatic disease. Azathioprine is another commonly used agent for remission maintenance in vasculitis.21 Azathioprine can cause cytopenias, infections, nausea, mucositis, hair loss, pancreatitis, and other problems, but like methotrexate, is usually well tolerated even for extended periods. Mycophenolate mofetil is also used for vasculitis. Cyclosporine has long been used in Behçet’s disease and occasionally in other vasculitides.

Rituximab has been demonstrated in two RCTs to have similar efficacy to cyclophosphamide for induction of remission in ANCA-associated vasculitis (GPA and MPA). The risks of rituximab include allergic reactions and potential for infections.

Plasmapheresis (plasma exchange) has a central role in treating anti–glomerular basement membrane antibody-associated disease (Goodpasture’s syndrome) and is used at some centers to treat both alveolar hemorrhage and severe glomerulonephritis in ANCA-associated vasculitis. The role of plasmapheresis in GPA and MPA is the focus of a currently enrolling international clinical trial. Pheresis is frequently used to treat acute manifestations of CV and occasionally other vasculitides. Intravenous IG is a mainstay of therapy for Kawasaki disease and has been advocated for several other types of vasculitis, often as a second- or third-line regimen, and based mostly on small case series.

Many biological agents (“biologics”) have been and continue to be studied as treatment for vasculitides23 (see Box 41-2). This rapidly expanding group of agents that inhibit specific targets within the immune system are having a remarkable impact on the care of patients with a wide variety of autoimmune and systemic inflammatory diseases. The studies of rituximab for GPA and MPA demonstrated efficacy of the new agent.24,25 However, despite initial enthusiasm from open-label studies, randomized trials studying the use of inhibitors of TNF-α did not demonstrate efficacy of this class of drug for treatment of either GPA42 or GCA.43 This experience highlights the need for properly conducted randomized clinical trials in vasculitis. Studies testing the efficacy of several other biologics for various forms of vasculitis are either currently in process or in the planning stages.

Miscellaneous Issues in the Treatment of Vasculitis

Accelerated atherosclerosis

Although there is little firm evidence yet, concern is growing that patients with inflammatory vasculitis are at increased risk of accelerated atherosclerosis and coronary artery disease, as is seen in patients with other chronic inflammatory diseases such as rheumatoid arthritis and SLE.45 The etiology of the atherosclerosis is likely multifactorial but includes glucocorticoid usage, lipid disorders associated with disease and treatment regimens, and other treatment-related problems, such as nephrotic syndrome and diabetes mellitus. The impact of chronic inflammation itself, however, may be the most important factor in the development of atherosclerosis. Ongoing research is directed at the interaction between inflammation and atherogenesis. Whether or not chronic therapy with statins or other agents that act via lipid or inflammatory pathways is appropriate has yet to be proved in clinical studies.

References

1 Bloch D.A., Michel B.A., Hunder G.G., et al. The American College of Rheumatology 1990 criteria for the classification of vasculitis. Patients and methods. Arthritis Rheum. 1990;33:1068–1073.

2 Jennette J.C., Falk R.J., Andrassy K., et al. Nomenclature of systemic vasculitides. Proposal of an international consensus conference. Arthritis Rheum. 1994;37:187–192.

3 Watts R.A., Suppiah R., Merkel P.A., et al. Systemic vasculitis–is it time to reclassify? Rheumatology (Oxford). 2011;50:643–645.

4 Kissin G.Y., Merkel P.A. Large-vessel vasculitis. In: Coffman J.D., Eberhardt R.T. Peripheral arterial disease: diagnosis and treatment. Totawa, NJ: Humana Press; 2002:319.

5 Weyand C.M., Goronzy J.J. Giant-cell arteritis and polymyalgia rheumatica. Ann Intern Med. 2003;139:505–515.

6 Kerr G.S., Hallahan C.W., Giordano J., et al. Takayasu arteritis. Ann Intern Med. 1994;120:919–929.

7 Sakane T., Takeno M., Suzuki N., et al. Behcet’s disease. N Engl J Med. 1999;341:1284–1291.

8 Sridharan S.T. Relapsing polychondritis. In: Hoffman G.S., Weyand C.M. Inflammatory diseases of blood vessels. New York: Marcel Dekker; 2001:675.

9 St Clair E.W., McCallum R.M. Cogan’s syndrome. Curr Opin Rheumatol. 1999;11:47–52.

10 Liang K.P., Chowdhary V.R., Michet C.J., et al. Noninfectious ascending aortitis: a case series of 64 patients. J Rheumatol. 2009;36:2290–2297.

11 Merkel P.A. Noninfectious ascending aortitis: staying ahead of the curve. J Rheumatol. 2009;36:2137–2140.

12 Rojo-Leyva F., Ratliff N.B., Cosgrove D.M.3rd, et al. Study of 52 patients with idiopathic aortitis from a cohort of 1,204 surgical cases. Arthritis Rheum. 2000;43:901–907.

13 Guillevin L. Polyarteritis nodosa and microscopic polyangiitis. In: Ball G.V., Bridges L. Vasculitis. New York: Oxford University Press; 2002:300.

14 Guillevin L., Lhote F., Cohen P., et al. Polyarteritis nodosa related to hepatitis B virus. A prospective study with long-term observation of 41 patients. Medicine (Baltimore). 1995;74:238–253.

15 Hoffman G.S., Gross W.L. Wegener’s granulomatosis: clinical aspects. In: Hoffman G.S., Weyand C.M. Inflammatory diseases of blood vessels. New York: Marcel Dekker; 2001:381.

16 Hoffman G.S., Kerr G.S., Leavitt R.Y., et al. Wegener’s granulomatosis: an analysis of 158 patients. Ann Intern Med. 1992;116:488–498.

17 Allenbach Y., Seror R., Pagnoux C., et al. High frequency of venous thromboembolic events in Churg-Strauss syndrome, Wegener’s granulomatosis and microscopic polyangiitis but not polyarteritis nodosa: a systematic retrospective study on 1130 patients. Ann Rheum Dis. 2009;68:564–567.

18 Merkel P.A., Lo G.H., Holbrook J.T., et al. Brief communication: high incidence of venous thrombotic events among patients with Wegener granulomatosis: the Wegener’s Clinical Occurrence of Thrombosis (WeCLOT) Study. Ann Intern Med. 2005;142:620–626.

19 Walton E.W. Giant-cell granuloma of the respiratory tract (Wegener’s granulomatosis). BMJ. 1958;2:265–270.

20 Reinhold-Keller E., Beuge N., Latza U., et al. An interdisciplinary approach to the care of patients with Wegener’s granulomatosis: long-term outcome in 155 patients. Arthritis Rheum. 2000;43:1021–1032.

21 Jayne D., Rasmussen N., Andrassy K., et al. A randomized trial of maintenance therapy for vasculitis associated with antineutrophil cytoplasmic autoantibodies. N Engl J Med. 2003;349:36–44.

22 Langford C.A. Treatment of ANCA-associated vasculitis. N Engl J Med. 2003;349:3–4.

23 Langford C.A., Sneller M.C. Biologic therapies in the vasculitides. Curr Opin Rheumatol. 2003;15:3–10.

24 Jones R.B., Tervaert J.W., Hauser T., et al. Rituximab versus cyclophosphamide in ANCA-associated renal vasculitis. N Engl J Med. 2010;363:211–220.

25 Stone J.H., Merkel P.A., Spiera R., et al. Rituximab versus cyclophosphamide for ANCA-associated vasculitis. N Engl J Med. 2010;363:221–232.

26 Guillevin L., Lhote F., Cohen P. Churg-Strauss syndrome: clinical aspects. In: Hoffman G.S., Weyand C.M. Inflammatory diseases of blood vessels. New York: Marcel Dekker; 2001:399.

27 Guillevin L., Cohen P., Gayraud M., et al. Churg-Strauss syndrome. Clinical study and long-term follow-up of 96 patients. Medicine (Baltimore). 1999;78:26–37.

28 Barron K.S. Kawasaki disease: etiology, pathogenesis, and treatment. Cleve Clin J Med. 2002;69(Suppl 2):SII69–SII78.

29 Saulsbury F.T. Henoch-Schonlein purpura. Curr Opin Rheumatol. 2001;13:35–40.

30 Cacoub P., Costedoat-Chalumeau N., Lidove O., et al. Cryoglobulinemia vasculitis. Curr Opin Rheumatol. 2002;14:29–35.

31 Calabrese L.H., Duna G.F., Lie J.T. Vasculitis in the central nervous system. Arthritis Rheum. 1997;40:1189–1201.

32 Hajj-Ali R.A., Singhal A.B., Benseler S., et al. Primary angiitis of the CNS. Lancet Neurol. 2011;10:561–572.

33 Calabrese L.H., Dodick D.W., Schwedt T.J., et al. Narrative review: reversible cerebral vasoconstriction syndromes. Ann Intern Med. 2007;146:34–44.

34 Merkel P.A. Drug-induced vasculitis. Rheum Dis Clin North Am. 2001;27:849–862.

35 Merkel P.A. Drug-induced vasculitis. In: Hoffman G.S., Weyand C.M. Inflammatory diseases of blood vessels. New York: Marcel Dekker; 2001:727.

36 Choi H.K., Merkel P.A., Walker A.M., et al. Drug-associated antineutrophil cytoplasmic antibody-positive vasculitis: prevalence among patients with high titers of antimyeloperoxidase antibodies. Arthritis Rheum. 2000;43:405–413.

37 Grayson P.C., Tomasson G., Cuthbertson D., et al. Association of vascular physical examination findings and arteriographic lesions in large vessel vasculitis. J Rheumatol. 2012;39:303–309.

38 Niles J.L. Antineutrophil cytoplasmic antibodies in the classification of vasculitis. Annu Rev Med. 1996;47:303–313.

39 Merkel P.A., Polisson R.P., Chang Y., et al. Prevalence of antineutrophil cytoplasmic antibodies in a large inception cohort of patients with connective tissue disease. Ann Intern Med. 1997;126:866–873.

40 Kissin E.Y., Merkel P.A. Diagnostic imaging in Takayasu arteritis. Curr Opin Rheumatol. 2004;16:31–37.

41 Langford C.A., Sneller M.C., Hoffman G.S. Methotrexate use in systemic vasculitis. Rheum Dis Clin North Am. 1997;23:841–853.

42 WGET Research Group. Etanercept plus standard therapy for Wegener’s granulomatosis. N Engl J Med. 2005;352:351–361.

43 Hoffman G.S., Cid M.C., Rendt-Zagar K.E., et al. Infliximab for maintenance of glucocorticosteroid-induced remission of giant cell arteritis: a randomized trial. Ann Intern Med. 2007;146:621–630.

44 Langford C.A., Kerr G.S. Pregnancy in vasculitis. Curr Opin Rheumatol. 2002;14:36–41.

45 Hahn B.H. Systemic lupus erythematosus and accelerated atherosclerosis. N Engl J Med. 2003;349:2379–2380.