Nuclear Medicine Imaging of Myocardial Perfusion

Published on 26/02/2015 by admin

Filed under Cardiovascular

Last modified 22/04/2025

Print this page

rate 1 star rate 2 star rate 3 star rate 4 star rate 5 star
Your rating: none, Average: 0 (0 votes)

This article have been viewed 2751 times

CHAPTER 54 Nuclear Medicine Imaging of Myocardial Perfusion

Radionuclide myocardial perfusion imaging (MPI) is a well-established, highly accurate, and reproducible noninvasive method to diagnose and assess functionally significant coronary artery disease (CAD). Extensive development and validation have brought this modality to the forefront of quantitative, noninvasive assessment of CAD. High accuracy and reproducibility have also contributed to its widespread adoption as a gold standard to quantify myocardial ischemia. MPI also provides important information regarding myocardial viability and prognosis.

The basic principles of MPI have been validated in animal models and clinical trials over the past several decades.14 Accepted clinical guidelines for use, technical aspects of quality control, and protocols for MPI stress testing and imaging for positron emission tomography (PET) and single photon emission computed tomography (SPECT) have been summarized in joint statements from the American Heart Association, American Society of Nuclear Cardiology, and American College of Cardiology,5 and the European Association of Nuclear Medicine and the European Society of Cardiology.6 This chapter highlights and summarizes the current clinical aspects of MPI. Emphasis is placed on describing the rationale and principles of MPI. The authors acknowledge variations in clinical practice based on local expertise and preference; however, space limitations do not permit a detailed discussion of all issues.

The first section reviews current clinical MPI using SPECT. Topics include radiotracers, instrumentation, procedures, and data analysis, including quantification and interpretation. Test performance and prognosis are reviewed under the general topic of interpretation. Assessment of myocardial viability with MPI also is briefly summarized (this is discussed more extensively in Chapter 55). Gated MPI to assess ventricular function is discussed in Chapter 56. Planar imaging produces lower image contrast and is reserved for special circumstances such as claustrophobic patients or patients unable to undergo SPECT imaging. An extensive review has been published.7 The second section reviews MPI with PET. The same general outline is followed in an abbreviated format with salient differences discussed between PET and SPECT.

MYOCARDIAL PERFUSION IMAGING WITH SPECT

Technical Aspects

Radiotracers

SPECT radionuclides in widespread clinical use include thallium 201 and Tc 99m radiotracers. Thallium 201 is a cyclotron-generated, monovalent cation with biologic properties analogous to those of potassium (K+). After intravenous administration, thallium 201 rapidly diffuses from the blood pool into the extravascular space where it is highly extracted by myocytes via the Na+,K+-ATPase pump. The initial myocardial uptake of thallium 201 is proportional to myocardial blood flow (MBF) and extraction fraction. Thallium 201 has the advantage of a high extraction fraction (approximately 85% to 88%), which is maintained up to MBF of approximately 2.5 mL/min/g. Myocardial territories distal to physiologically significant stenoses (i.e., ischemic myocardial regions) are unable to compensate sufficiently at stress with increased blood flow, and a perfusion defect can be detected as a relative reduction in radiotracer activity in this territory.

After administration, thallium 201 begins to redistribute significantly as it equilibrates with the extracellular concentration. In ischemic territories of lower MBF at rest, lower washout of radiotracer also contributes to equilibration. This more uniform myocardial radiotracer distribution at delayed (typically 4 hours) time points (“redistribution”) is deemed “reversible” compared with stress perfusion, and a functionally significant coronary stenosis can be noninvasively diagnosed. Previous studies have verified that administration of a small reinjection of thallium 201 of 37 MBq (1 mCi) at rest improves the detection of viable myocardium.8 This is a widely accepted clinical procedure to enhance the detection of viable myocardium.

The major disadvantages of thallium 201 are related to its physical properties compared with the properties of Tc 99m radiotracers. The long physical radiotracer half-life (73 hours) limits the administered activity to 148 to 167 MBq (4 to 4.5 mCi) per day because of radiation dose considerations (148 MBq [4 mCi] of activity delivers 24 mSv [2.4 rem] of whole body radiation dose equivalent). Because of radiation dose limitations, low photon flux contributes to lower true count images compared with Tc 99m radiotracer studies. The photopeak of thallium 201 (69 to 83 keV; 95% abundance) is also relatively low; this increases the amount of radiation absorbed and the scatter fraction. Also, spatial resolution and energy resolution of gamma camera imaging is better for the higher 140 keV gamma ray energy of Tc 99m than for the lower energies of thallium 201. The combination of these effects, especially in large patients, adversely affects thallium 201 image quality and can make interpretation difficult.

Tc 99m-sestamibi and Tc 99m-tetrofosmin are the most commonly used clinical MPI radiotracers. Common properties include high lipophilicity, relatively high first-pass extraction, and insignificant radiotracer redistribution. Conceptually, they can be viewed as radiotracer “microspheres” that define MBF at the time of administration with no significant washout or redistribution at delayed imaging. Their first-pass extraction fractions are lower than that of thallium 201. Their linear relationships with blood flow are maintained up to MBF rates of approximately 2 mL/min/g. Theoretically, this can result in reduced sensitivity for detection of CAD; however, large clinical studies have shown similar overall accuracies compared with examinations performed with thallium 201. These radiotracers enter myocytes by passive diffusion, the diffusion rate of which is proportional to the regional myocardial flow. They are then sequestered in the mitochondria because of the electrochemical gradient, which is maintained in viable myocytes.

An advantage of Tc 99m radiotracers is the short half-life (6.02 hours). This short half-life permits a higher administered activity (approximately 8 to 10 times higher; 14 mSv [1.4 rem] for 1.11 GBq [30 mCi] activity), higher photon flux, and, consequently, higher count images compared with thallium 201. In addition, the higher photopeak of 140 keV results in less soft tissue attenuation, less scatter, and improved spatial resolution. These factors contribute to improved image quality compared with thallium 201, and reduce the time required for image acquisition. This is particularly important because ECG gating with Tc 99m radiotracers is commonly performed. Reduced imaging time also reduces patient discomfort and the likelihood of motion artifacts, which may compromise image quality. Tc 99m is also commercially available from generators, which are widely available at a low cost.

Tc 99m-sestamibi is a lipophilic cationic compound. Tc 99m-tetrofosmin is a diphosphine lipophilic cationic complex of Tc 99m. Tetrofosmin is reported to have faster clearance from the liver and lungs; however, the clinical significance with respect to improved diagnostic accuracy has yet to be established. A large retrospective study has shown that Tc 99m-tetrofosmin scans are essentially equivalent to Tc 99m-sestamibi in determining prognosis in high-risk patients.9 Examples of normal Tc 99m-sestamibi studies are shown in Figures 54-1 and 54-2. A gated study showing the utility of aiding in identifying a breast attenuation artifact is shown in Figure 54-3.

Techniques in SPECT

Indications

The American College of Cardiology Foundation and the American Society of Nuclear Cardiology jointly published guidelines for appropriateness criteria.11 The indications deemed most appropriate were those in which patients presented with intermediate or high pretest probabilities in the categories described subsequently. MPI as a screening tool in very low pretest probability patients is generally considered inappropriate.

Appropriate patient populations include the following categories: (1) detection of CAD in symptomatic or asymptomatic patients (chest pain, newly diagnosed heart failure or diastolic dysfunction, newly diagnosed arrhythmias including atrial fibrillation and ventricular fibrillation); (2) risk assessment in patients with intermediate or high pretest probability of CAD; (3) risk assessment in patients with known coronary disease; and (4) evaluation of myocardial viability. Although other indications may be warranted, the above-listed indications were judged to be most appropriate in most referred cases. Typical MPI patterns are shown in Figures 54-4 through 54-6.

A unique clinical scenario for MPI is in the evaluation of acute coronary syndromes in patients presenting to the emergency department.12 In patients without a history of prior myocardial infarction (MI) and an intermediate probability of CAD, the sensitivity for detection is very high. In this population actively having chest pain at the time of radiotracer administration, the negative predictive value of normal MPI is 99% to 100%. If the chest pain has resolved at the time of radiotracer administration, test sensitivity is modestly reduced, and current guidelines recommend repeating radiotracer administration within 2 hours of symptom abatement.12 Because Tc 99m perfusion agents do not have significant redistribution for 6 hours, imaging can be performed after resolution of chest pain and still reflects the myocardial perfusion at the time administration. In patients presenting to the emergency department with chest pain that has resolved, and in whom recent myocardial injury has been excluded by a chest pain protocol including ECG and cardiac enzymes, a subsequent stress MPI study can be safely performed to exclude functional CAD.

Another unique use of MPI is for risk assessment. A large body of knowledge has shown that the defect size and severity, and the amount of reversibility by MPI are highly predictive of subsequent cardiac events. The negative predictive value of a normal or mildly abnormal study is also very high; these patients have a cardiac mortality of less than 1% per year, which is approximately the same as that of the general population. A highly abnormal study with severe and extensive perfusion abnormalities can have a cardiac event rate of 6% to 8% per year. This significantly higher incidence of adverse cardiac events, including subsequent MI, can have an impact on subsequent clinical management decisions.

As previously mentioned, an important specific indication is for the evaluation of myocardial viability. In most cases, SPECT MPI can accurately assess myocardial viability with a resting thallium 201 study followed by redistribution imaging, or with a stress-redistribution-reinjection thallium 201 protocol.

Pitfalls and Solutions

Quality Assurance

A QA program for gamma camera SPECT operation is essential to avoid artifacts, which could result in misinterpretation of test results. Proof of the establishment and diligent adherence to an equipment QA program is an integral part of laboratory accreditation by the American College of Radiology and the Intersocietal Commission for the Accreditation of Nuclear Medicine Laboratories. Conventional planar and specific SPECT and PET imaging QA procedures should be performed and recorded periodically. Daily QA includes ensuring correct isotope energy peak, and “daily floods” to assess gamma camera imaging field uniformity. Weekly QA includes resolution and linearity checks with “bar phantoms.” Many manufacturers include software that can automatically compute planar measurements including differential and integral flood field uniformity and intrinsic linear resolution from bar phantoms.10

SPECT requires additional calibrations and gamma camera measurement to avoid artifacts specifically related to tomographic imaging. Calibrations to correct for the center of rotation and high count extrinsic (with a collimator) flood field uniformity are typically acquired on a weekly or quarterly basis. SPECT imaging of multipurpose thermoplastic (Plexiglas) phantoms is also highly recommended on a quarterly basis, and is mandated by laboratory accrediting agencies. These phantoms have solid “cold” spheres of differing sizes, and are filled with background radioactivity. The phantom assesses three-dimensional spatial resolution, uniformity, and tomographic image contrast. Full QA testing is also typically performed with initial equipment acceptance testing, and after each major servicing or software upgrade to ensure proper functioning. Errors in center of rotation or nonuniformities in the flood field may result in loss of spatial resolution (blurring), or SPECT artifacts (“ring”), or both, which could affect clinical interpretation of images and can be particularly troublesome in MPI.

Many SPECT systems include attenuation correction components, using radioactive scanning line sources, low-end CT devices, or diagnostic-quality CT. These attenuation-correcting devices require their own set of daily, weekly, and annual QA procedures. Likewise, PET and PET/CT scanners have specific QA requirements, as specified by the equipment manufacturers and as mandated by laboratory accreditation agencies. Typical PET and PET/CT QA procedures have been reviewed in a more recent publication.10

Description of Techniques and Protocols

Radionuclide Imaging Protocols

Exercise Protocols

In normal individuals, peak exercise increases heart rate and myocardial oxygen demand. At peak exercise, MBF typically increases approximately three to four times over that of rest. In patients with significant CAD, this mechanism fails to increase blood flow adequately distal to an obstructive lesion, resulting in an imbalance between oxygen supply and demand.

Before exercise, patients should have nothing per mouth after midnight, and be instructed to wear loose, comfortable clothing. We recommend abstinence from caffeinated substances because of the possibility that a pharmacologic stress test may be needed if an inadequate maximal heart rate is reached during maximal exercise stress testing. Intravenous access is obtained typically in the antecubital vein, ECG leads are securely placed, and the patient’s hemodynamic status is closely monitored and recorded throughout the procedure. The radiotracer is administered at peak or target heart rate while exercising. Hemodynamic and ECG monitoring are continued for at least 5 minutes into the recovery period, or until symptoms or ECG changes resolve. Patients with good functional capacity can typically exercise on the Bruce protocol, which rapidly increases in speed and incline. Patients who are older or debilitated may use a modified Bruce exercise protocol, which more gradually increases in speed and incline to achieve target heart rate. In individuals with significant limitations of physical tolerance or in patients 3 to 5 days post-MI, a Naughton protocol or other low-level exercise protocol may be used at the physician’s discretion.

Pharmacologic Protocols—Adenosine

Adenosine is a coronary vasodilator commonly used in combination with MPI.13 This is a purine base, endogenously produced by myocardial smooth muscle and vascular endothelium. It is derived through extracellular dephosphorylation of adenosine triphosphate (ATP) and adenosine diphosphate (ADP). There are four known receptor subtypes specific for adenosine. A2A is considered a cardiac specific receptor, through which coronary vasodilation is initiated after intravenous adenosine administration.

Adenosine causes a vasodilation without direct chronotropic or inotropic responses in myocardium. Secondary hemodynamic changes in response to vasodilation include a modest decrease in systolic and diastolic blood pressure, and a compensatory increase in heart rate with modest increase in cardiac output. The coronary vasodilation increases MBF three to five times above that of baseline resting MBF in normal coronary vessels; this is comparable to the increase in MBF with maximal exercise. Coronary arterial segments distal to a significant coronary artery lesion (i.e., stenoses ≥70%) typically are vasodilated as a basal condition to maintain normal blood flow at rest. Adenosine causes vasodilation and an increase in blood flow to territories with normal coronary arteries, but cannot comparably increase flow to regions distal to stenoses that are already dilated in a resting condition. A relative perfusion abnormality can be seen in regions distal to a stenosis.

Adenosine has a very short half life of 10 to 15 seconds and is administered at the rate of 140 µg/kg/min over 4 minutes. Protocols using either 6 minutes or 3 to 4 minutes are equally effective. The stress radiotracer is administered after 4 minutes of infusion to define coronary blood flow at maximal vasodilation. Side effects are similar to dipyridamole, but also include atrioventricular block. The most common side effects are intermittent atrioventricular block, flushing, chest pain, and dyspnea. Because of the very short physiologic half-life, these side effects are very short-lived and resolve within 1 to 2 minutes of discontinuation.

Pharmacologic Protocols—Dipyridamole

Dipyridamole is also a commonly used vasodilator for MPI stress testing.14 It is an indirect vasodilator that acts by blocking the cellular metabolism of adenosine. This results in a high local interstitial concentration, which subsequently results in coronary vasodilation. Dipyridamole is infused at a rate of 142 µg/kg/min over 4 minutes. The most common side effects include headache, flushing, hypotension, nausea, and chest discomfort. Because of a relatively longer biologic half-life of dipyridamole, the radiotracer is administered at 6 minutes after the start of the dipyridamole infusion. In addition, side effects may last for several minutes, but can be rapidly reversed by intravenous infusion of aminophylline, which acts by competitively inhibiting adenosine binding to its receptors.

Compared with adenosine, dipyridamole is equally effective in producing coronary vasodilation, and has a lower overall incidence of side effects, including induction of atrioventricular block. Dipyridamole can be used in patients with prolonged P–R interval and in elderly patients with poor tolerance to side effects.

SPECT Imaging Protocols

Several protocols using thallium 201, Tc 99m, or both radiotracers have been well studied and characterized with respect to accuracy. Although modest differences exist, overall accuracy of the most common protocols is comparable. When using same-day protocols with Tc 99m radiotracers, however, the resting study should be performed first to avoid “false-positive” fixed defects.16 If stress imaging is performed first, the higher MBF at stress combined with a relatively high stress radiotracer injection activity may lead to overestimation of MI because the subsequent resting images also reflect stress tracer distribution. If the resting study is performed first, the subsequent stress activity is much higher (approximately three times higher), and the increased blood flow at stress (approximately 2.5 to 3 times higher) produces a higher “weighting” on the stress images; this effectively reduces the contribution of the previous resting activity on the stress images. The number of potential false-negative results for ischemia is small because the resting activity has a relatively small contribution to the stress imaging.

Acquisition Protocols

The following protocols are suggested guidelines for an average-sized 70-kg man. For larger patients, increasing administered activity, imaging time, or both may partially compensate for the loss in detected true counts and subsequent decrease in image quality. Generally, the multiheaded gamma camera parameters for acquisition are similar for thallium 201 and Tc 99m radiotracers. Similar parameters include acceptance energy window (15% to 20% symmetric); low-energy, high-resolution collimation; 180 degrees orbit (45 degrees right anterior oblique to 45 degrees left posterior oblique); number of projections (60 to 64); matrix size (64 × 64); time per projection (20 to 30 seconds); and ECG frames per cardiac cycle (8 to 16). Stress and rest imaging time is currently approximately 20 to 30 minutes.

ECG gating permits the acquisition of separate time bin data sets with respect to the phase of the ECG cycle. By acquiring and reconstructing separate data sets within the ECG cycle, a dynamic set of images can be reconstructed to reflect the various phases of contraction and permit evaluation of ventricular function. This can be performed routinely without adversely increasing imaging time or compromising patient comfort. The gated images are reconstructed and displayed in cine format for evaluation as described subsequently. A limitation of this technique is the requirement of a relatively regular rhythm over the imaging period. In patients with atrial fibrillation or other markedly irregular rhythms, the ventricular function from gating cannot be reliably assessed. Routine patient-specific QA procedures include verification of the successful transmission of the correct heart rate information to the data acquisition computer system. Common imaging protocols include the following.

Image Interpretation

Postprocessing

Tomographic images typically are reconstructed from the raw projection data with filtered back-projection and low-pass filtering. The degree of low-pass filtering depends on the counting statistics and noise. New algorithms have become commercially available that replace filtered back-projection by iterative reconstruction techniques, some versions of which incorporate depth-dependent collimator imaging characteristics and attenuation correcting data, both of which may improve overall image quality, particularly for low count perfusion images.

After tomographic reconstruction, the stress and rest images are normalized to the peak activity within the myocardium. This normalization permits a consistent comparison of regions within the myocardium, and it allows for a relative comparison between the stress and rest studies despite differences in absolute counts between studies.

An important aspect of MPI is quantification of defect size and severity. After normalization, this quantification can be performed automatically by computer analysis. Because the normal radiotracer distribution may vary depending on the patient population (e.g., breast attenuation in women and diaphragm attenuation in men), tomographic images are matched to the appropriate normal database cohort. Myocardial perfusion tomograms are processed automatically to generate a two-dimensional parametric display (bull’s-eye plot) from the three-dimensional count distribution. This display provides a rapid overview of three-dimensional myocardial perfusion for comparison between stress and rest count distributions.

Automated boundary detection programs define endocardial and epicardial borders of the myocardium. Applied to all cycles of gated studies, the left ventricular volumes provide measurements of global and regional left ventricular function and ejection fraction. Several groups and manufacturers have implemented their algorithms into commercially available software. Because of differences in physical modeling assumptions, algorithm implementation, and boundary detection methods, different software packages have different normal values and may produce significantly different results.17 Direct comparisons between values produced from different software packages should be performed carefully and should take into account algorithm differences, including the use of algorithm-specific databases of normal limits.

Interpretation

Interpretation of projection images (“raw data”) is essential for proper interpretation of the tomographic images. Projection data typically are first viewed in cine format to identify potential causes of decreased activity or artifacts. Identifying patient motion during image acquisition is an important step in identifying artifacts that could potentially be misinterpreted as perfusion defects. The effect of patient motion is often very difficult to predict with respect to location or appearance on reconstructed images. An artifactual perfusion defect may appear with misalignment of the ventricular walls, association with extracardiac activity adjacent to the defect, or a defect in a noncoronary distribution.

If there is a concern that an apparent perfusion defect may represent an artifact owing to patient motion, repeat imaging (Tc 99m radiotracers or resting thallium 201) should be considered to clarify the issue. Although motion correction software may reduce the effect of patient motion, software may be unable to eliminate completely the effect of patient motion on the final reconstructed tomographic images. Any application of motion-correcting software must be reviewed carefully to verify that the algorithm performed the intended correction appropriately, as part of routine patient-specific QA. Generally, vertical motion errors are detected and corrected more reliably than horizontal and bulk body motion errors. An example of a motion artifact is shown in Figure 54-7.

Another common artifact is due to soft tissue attenuation. In women, breast attenuation can result in either a uniform or a nonuniform decrease in detected counts, most commonly in the anterior or anterolateral left ventricular wall region. Similarly, inferior decreased activity from diaphragm attenuation may be seen with a relatively high frequency in men. “Diaphragmatic creep” is an artifact caused by the changing position of the heart immediately after strenuous exercise stress and during the recovery phase. Because deep respiratory excursion gradually subsides after exercise, the location and orientation of the heart may change while imaging after exercise stress. The resulting tomographic images, which are a composite of various positions, may show a lower activity in the inferior wall because of this cardiac motion artifact. Assessment of the projection images for changes in heart position through imaging can determine if the potential for this artifact is present in an individual study.

Three physiologic parameters can be assessed from the projection data. The first is left ventricular cavity size. It is possible to appreciate markedly decreased counts within the left ventricular cavity, and a relatively large cavity compared with the myocardial thickness indicates left ventricular dilation. Measurements of ventricular size from the computer-generated boundaries may also confirm left ventricular enlargement. In patients with prior apical infarction and left ventricular dysfunction, ungated images may show a markedly decreased left ventricular cavity activity because of abnormally and severely decreased wall motion adjacent to infarction. In patients with an area of severely decreased activity at the apex because of prior infarction, severely decreased wall motion or dyskinesis may contribute to an almost entirely absent apical defect of attenuating blood pool (“black hole sign”; Fig. 54-8) that is associated with a higher incidence of apical aneurysm.

The second physiologic sign is increased lung uptake. This increased lung uptake has been well described in thallium 201 myocardial perfusion studies as a poor prognostic indicator, which reflects left ventricular dysfunction. The increase in lung uptake, defined as greater than 50% of the peak myocardial activity, is an indicator of abnormally prolonged pulmonary transit time. Patients with either exercise-induced or resting left ventricular dysfunction have increased pulmonary transit time, and prolonged exposure of the radiotracer to the lungs results in increased lung uptake, which can be assessed visually. This may be seen in patients with prior MI and elevated left ventricular end-diastolic pressure, or exercise-induced left ventricular dysfunction when the pulmonary transit time is increased. These findings may also be seen with Tc 99m radiotracers; however, because Tc 99m imaging may be performed at a time considerably later than the stress testing, some degree of lung clearance may occur, and increased lung uptake may not be apparent on subsequent imaging.

The third physiologic sign relates to right ventricular uptake. In normal patients, right ventricular myocardium is thin and may not be seen reliably because of partial volume effects. In patients with elevated right ventricular pressures or unusually thickened myocardium, abnormal right ventricular size or uptake may also be detected, in at least the thickest parts of the right ventricle, if not the entire right ventricle. These may be indirect signs of right ventricular hypertrophy, volume overload, or pressure overload.

When interpreting and reporting MPI, important aspects include perfusion defect size, severity, and reversibility. Although a visual interpretation may be accurate with respect to the presence or absence of coronary disease, quantitative information has prognostic significance. The size and severity of the perfusion defect are predictive of cardiac events, including MI and cardiac death.18 These are important for risk stratification and patient management. Small, mild defects are associated with low cardiac mortality of less than 1% per year.19 Severe defects and extensive ischemia are associated with significantly higher cardiac events and worse short-term prognosis. In addition, the short-term outcome for cardiac events in patients with mild ischemia is worse for patients undergoing revascularization.20 In contrast, the short-term cardiac event rate for patients with severe defects is lower for patients undergoing revascularization compared with medical management. Quantitative measures of myocardial perfusion scintigraphy may determine the most appropriate subsequent therapy in patients with known CAD.20

As discussed in Chapter 55, global and regional left ventricular function are very important parameters for clinical management. Left ventricular functional assessment by left ventricular ejection fraction is highly predictive of mortality. Regional functional assessment may also influence clinical management. A segment of dysfunctional myocardium with preserved viability may be important from the perspective of potential revascularization.

Other Artifacts and Normal Variants

Test Accuracy

Myocardial Viability

Using the stress-redistribution-reinjection thallium 201 protocol, areas of reversible ischemia can be identified as viable. A resting-redistribution thallium 201 study can assess regions of low resting blood flow and residual viable myocardium (“hibernating myocardium”). Resting images obtained immediately after injection represent MBF. Any perfusion defects seen on initial imaging caused by low resting blood flow show slower washout and “redistribution” compared with defects with normal resting blood flow. This normalization (“reversibility”) of resting perfusion defects on delayed imaging indicates viable myocardium. If a severe perfusion defect on initial rest imaging does not improve on the redistribution study (“fixed”), this correlates well with infarction.

A more recent study comparing rest-redistribution thallium 201 with myocardial delayed hyperenhancement by MRI confirmed high quantitative correlation of infarct size (r = 0.90).24 Thallium 201 rest-redistribution also correlates well with viability by 18FDG-PET.8 Despite being “fixed” perfusion defects, mild and moderate (<50% decreased counts compared with normal areas) defects are considered viable. Viable regions by thallium 201 showed a 98% concordance with viability by 18FDG-PET. Only a relatively small proportion (approximately 30%) of severe fixed defects by thallium 201 showed discordant viability by 18FDG-PET.8 This detection of myocardial viability can determine the suitability of a candidate for revascularization.

Rest-redistribution and stress-redistribution-reinjection thallium 201 with SPECT are considered highly accurate in evaluating myocardial viability; however, PET has better spatial resolution and attenuation correction, and is generally considered superior for this indication. MRI has shown comparable results for viability determination, and is able to determine the extent of subendocardial infarction with better spatial resolution.25

MYOCARDIAL PERFUSION IMAGING WITH PET

Clinical Indications

The currently approved indications for PET in nuclear medicine include MPI and myocardial viability assessment. The major advantages of PET over SPECT include the routine use of attenuation correction, higher detection sensitivity, and superior spatial resolution. PET perfusion radiotracers are currently relatively expensive, however, and have shorter physical half-lives compared with SPECT radiotracers. Although absolute quantification of MBF is possible, dynamic imaging and modeling are technically demanding, and have not been considered essential for clinical diagnostic imaging.

Patients with a high body mass index are especially well suited for PET because of (1) routine use of high-quality attenuation correction, and (2) higher photon detection sensitivity, owing to a lower proportion of photon scatter and tissue attenuation compared with SPECT. In addition, PET scans generally contain more than 100 times as many counts as do SPECT scans, particularly for three-dimensional data acquisitions, as opposed to two-dimensional PET data acquisitions. An example of an ammonia N 13 dipyridamole PET study is shown in Figure 54-9.

image

image FIGURE 54-9 Normal ammonia N 13 PET myocardial perfusion pharmacologic stress imaging with dipyridamole. Note excellent spatial resolution and more uniform radiotracer distribution compared with traditional SPECT Tc 99m-sestamibi imaging (see Figs. 54-1 and 54-2), despite the patient’s high body mass index (BMI) of 50. BP, blood pressure; HLA, horizontal long axis; LAD/D1, first diagonal branch of the left anterior descending artery; PTCA, percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty; SA, short axis; VLA, vertical long axis.

The major clinical disadvantages of PET currently relate to the available myocardial perfusion radiotracers (expense, availability, cost, and physical properties). These physical factors result in numerous technical differences compared with SPECT, which are discussed briefly here.

Technical Aspects

PET Myocardial Perfusion Imaging Radiotracers

Numerous radiotracers have been validated to evaluate myocardial perfusion. The two most commonly used are ammonia N 13 and rubidium 82. Other validated PET myocardial perfusion radiotracers, such as 15O water and 11C compounds with high first-pass extraction fraction, are currently investigational and not approved for clinical use. Although data indicate superiority of these as perfusion tracers, they have physical half-lives of only 122 seconds (15O water) and 20 minutes (11C), requiring an on-site cyclotron for synthesis, and these tracers currently are impractical for widespread clinical use.

PET has been well established as an accurate means for the evaluation of myocardial viability. The presence of preserved myocardial metabolism by 18FDG is highly accurate in the detection of myocardial viability, and its use is briefly discussed here. Aspects of PET imaging involving highly sophisticated radiotracer compartmental modeling quantification are not discussed. Although well validated in many prior studies, these are not routinely used in clinical practice.

Description of Technique and Protocols

The general procedures for PET MPI are outlined next. Differences in physical properties of the PET radiotracers necessitate differences in protocols to optimize imaging.

PET Image Acquisition

The typical imaging time for acquiring PET myocardial perfusion emission data is approximately 10 minutes for ammonia N 13 and 5 minutes for rubidium 82. The attenuation correction scan, either the PET transmission scan or the CT transmission scan, should be acquired in close temporal proximity to the emission study. A single transmission scan can be performed to correct the rest and stress emission scans if the emission scans are done in close temporal proximity, and there is little chance of patient motion. If there is a question of patient motion between the two scans, separate transmission scans can be acquired to correct each emission scan separately. For attenuation correction, older PET scanners used a transmission scan with a positron-emitting source (e.g., 68Ga or 137Cs). More recent PET scanners, optimized primarily for whole body 18FDG-PET oncology applications, have incorporated sophisticated multidetector CT devices, which are used for attenuation correction and colocalization. Cardiac PET emission data from these PET scanners use attenuation correction data acquired using the CT scanners, transformed to attenuation maps for 511-keV gamma ray emission.

Image misregistration between the PET emission and the CT transmission scans is a potential cause of artifacts, the clinical impact of which is currently under investigation. Because of the high temporal resolution of CT and the short imaging time during which the CT scan is acquired, the depth of respiration during CT scanning may significantly differ compared with the average diaphragm position during the PET emission scan. This mismatch could potentially result in inaccurate attenuation correction, and a mismatch could potentially be misinterpreted as a perfusion defect. Several methods to correct for this mismatch are currently under investigation; inspection of the degree of mismatch is recommended as part of QA before interpretation of these studies.

For most clinical studies, relative quantification of perfusion and function with PET is performed in a manner that is very similar to that performed with SPECT. The attenuation-corrected PET scans result in a more uniform normal perfusion pattern with PET. Overall, the diagnostic accuracy of PET is higher than that of SPECT. Because of attenuation correction, higher sensitivity, and better spatial resolution, PET may be particularly useful in large patients, and in patients with severe attenuation artifacts.

Myocardial Viability

The diagnostic accuracy of 18FDG-PET in the evaluation of myocardial viability is well established.26,27 Revascularization improved left ventricular function in 85% of segments with preservation of 18FDG uptake; no functional improvement was seen in 92% of segments with matched absence of blood flow and 18FDG uptake.26 More recently, 18FDG-PET myocardial viability used to select revascularization candidates was associated with significantly lower in-hospital death rate, improved 12-month survival, and reduced complicated perioperative recovery.28 Fluorine 18 is a positron imaging isotope with a physical half-life of 110 minutes. 18FDG is a glucose analogue, which is transported intracellularly via glucose transporters. It is subsequently phosphorylated to FDG-6-phosphate, and trapped intracellularly without further metabolism because of its stereochemistry. The radiation dose of typical injected activity of 370 MBq (10 mCi) of 18FDG is approximately 11 mSv (1.1 rem).

When myocardial tissue is subjected to oxygen demands that exceed limited blood flow, myocardial ischemia results in a shift of metabolism from free fatty acids to glycolysis. To maintain myocardial viability, energy consumption is reduced, and myocardial contraction is decreased. Because of this, 18FDG uptake is high in residual viable myocardium.

Myocardial viability with regional dysfunction may be present in a spectrum of overlapping physiologic scenarios ranging from decreased to normal resting MBF. This complex issue is currently evolving as further studies report new data. Classically, hibernating myocardium by PET is defined by reduced resting MBF with preserved myocardial metabolism evidenced by 18FDG uptake. If resting perfusion is normal, intermittent episodes of myocardial ischemia produced by episodes of increased oxygen demand may produce a condition termed stunning. This repetitive, intermittent stress-induced ischemia may be sufficient to produce chronic myocardial dysfunction. In this clinical scenario, resting perfusion by PET may be normal, and there may be preservation of 18FDG uptake in regions of myocardial dysfunction. A matched reduction in blood flow and metabolism is considered nonviable myocardium or infarction. An example of a myocardial viability study is shown in Figure 54-10.

REFERENCES

1 Gerson MC. Cardiac Nuclear Medicine, 3rd ed. New York: McGraw-Hill; 1997.

2 Iskandrian AE, Garcia EV. Nuclear Cardiac Imaging: Principles and Applications, 3rd ed. New York: Oxford University Press; 2003.

3 Zaret BL, Beller G. Clinical Nuclear Cardiology: State of the Art. St Louis: Mosby; 1993.

4 Heller GV, Hendel R. Nuclear Cardiology: Practical Applications. New York: McGraw Hill; 2004.

5 Klocke FJ, Baird MG, Lorell BH, et al. ACC/AHA/ASNC guidelines for the clinical use of cardiac radionuclide imaging—executive summary: a report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines (ACC/AHA/ASNC Committee to Revise the 1995 Guidelines for the Clinical Use of Cardiac Radionuclide Imaging). Circulation. 2003;108:1404-1418.

6 Hesse B, Tagil K, Cuocolo A, et al. EANM/ESC procedural guidelines for myocardial perfusion imaging in nuclear cardiology. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2005;32:855-897.

7 Peter LT, Frans JT. Myocardial perfusion planar imaging (abstract). J Nucl Cardiol. 2006;13:e91-e96.

8 Dilsizian V, Perronefilardi P, Arrighi JA, et al. Concordance and discordance between stress-redistribution-reinjection and rest-redistribution thallium imaging for assessing viable myocardium—comparison with metabolic-activity by positron emission tomography. Circulation. 1993;88:941-952.

9 Borges-Neto S, Tuttle RH, Shaw LK, et al. Outcome prediction in patients at high risk for coronary artery disease: comparison between Tc-99m tetrofosmin and Tc-99m sestamibi. Radiology. 2004;232:58-65.

10 Nichols KJ, Bacharach SL, Bergmann SR, et al. Instrumentation quality assurance and performance. J Nucl Cardiol. 2006;13:e25-e41.

11 Brindis R. ACCF/ASNC appropriateness criteria for single-photon emission computed tomography myocardial perfusion imaging (SPECT MPI)—a report of the American College of Cardiology Foundation Quality Strategic Directions Committee Appropriateness Criteria Working Group and the American Society of Nuclear Cardiology. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2005;46:1587-1605.

12 Wackers FJT, Brown KA, Heller GV, et al. American Society of Nuclear Cardiology position statement on radionuclide imaging in patients with suspected acute ischemic syndromes in the emergency department or chest pain center. J Nucl Cardiol. 2002;9:246-250.

13 Verani MS. Pharmacological stress with adenosine for myocardial perfusion imaging. Semin Nucl Med. 1991;21:266-272.

14 Botvinick EH, Dae MW. Dipyridamole perfusion scintigraphy. Semin Nucl Med. 1991;21:242-265.

15 Geleijnse ML, Elhendy A, Fioretti PM, et al. Dobutamine stress myocardial perfusion imaging. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2000;36:2017-2027.

16 Taillefer RF, Gagnon AF, Laflamme LF, et al. Same day injections of Tc-99m methoxy isobutyl isonitrile (hexamibi) for myocardial tomographic imaging: comparison between rest-stress and stress-rest injection sequences. Eur J Nucl Med. 1989;15:113-117.

17 Arik W, Piotr JS, Mathews BF, et al. Quantitative myocardial-perfusion SPECT: comparison of three state-of-the-art software packages (abstract). J Nucl Cardiol. 2008;15:27-34.

18 Hachamovitch R, Hayes SW, Friedman JD, et al. Stress myocardial perfusion single-photon emission computed tomography is clinically effective and cost effective in risk stratification of patients with a high likelihood of coronary artery disease (CAD) but no known CAD. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2004;43:200-208.

19 Metz LD, Beattie MF, Hom RF, et al. The prognostic value of normal exercise myocardial perfusion imaging and exercise echocardiography: a meta-analysis. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2007;49:227-237.

20 Hachamovitch RF, Hayes SW, Friedman JD, et al. Comparison of the short-term survival benefit associated with revascularization compared with medical therapy in patients with no prior coronary artery disease undergoing stress myocardial perfusion single photon emission computed tomography. Circulation. 2003;107:2900-2907.

21 Goetze S, Wahl RL. Prevalence of misregistration between SPECT and CT for attenuation-corrected myocardial perfusion SPECT. J Nucl Cardiol. 2007;14:200-206.

22 Taillefer R, DePuey EG, Udelson JE, et al. Comparative diagnostic accuracy of Tl-201 and Tc-99m sestamibi SPECT imaging (perfusion and ECG-gated SPECT) in detecting coronary artery disease in women. J Am Coll Cardiol. 1997;29:69-77.

23 Beller GA, Zaret BL. Contributions of nuclear cardiology to diagnosis and prognosis of patients with coronary artery disease. Circulation. 2000;101:1465-1478.

24 Fieno DS, Louise EJT, Piotr S, et al. Quantitation of infarct size in patients with chronic coronary artery disease using rest-redistribution Tl-201 myocardial perfusion SPECT: correlation with contrast-enhanced cardiac magnetic resonance (abstract). J Nucl Cardiol. 2007;14:59-67.

25 Schinkel AF, Poldermans DF, Elhendy AF, et al. Assessment of myocardial viability in patients with heart failure. J Nucl Med. 2007;48:1135-1146.

26 Tillisch J, Brunken R, Marshall R, et al. Reversibility of cardiac wall-motion abnormalities predicted by positron tomography. N Engl J Med. 1986;314:884-888.

27 Saha GB, MacIntyre WJ, Brunken RC, et al. Present assessment of myocardial viability by nuclear imaging. Semin Nucl Med. 1996;26:315-335.

28 Haas F, Haehnel CJ, Picker W, et al. Preoperative positron emission tomographic viability assessment and perioperative and postoperative risk in patients with advanced ischemic heart disease. J Am Coll Cardiol. 1997;30:1693-1700.

29 Di Carli MF, Hachamovitch R. Hybrid PET/CT is greater than the sum of its parts: relationship between CT coronary angiography and stress perfusion imaging in patients with suspected ischemic heart disease assessed by integrated PET-CT imaging. J Nucl Cardiol. 2008;15:118-122.

30 Di Carli MF, Dorbala S, Curillova Z, et al. Relationship between CT coronary angiography and stress perfusion imaging in patients with suspected ischemic heart disease assessed by integrated PET-CT imaging. J Nucl Cardiol. 2007;14:799-809.