Non-penetrating surgery

Published on 08/03/2015 by admin

Filed under Opthalmology

Last modified 22/04/2025

Print this page

rate 1 star rate 2 star rate 3 star rate 4 star rate 5 star
Your rating: none, Average: 0 (0 votes)

This article have been viewed 3234 times

CHAPTER 38 Non-penetrating surgery

Introduction

See Video image

Trabeculectomy is the procedure of choice for glaucoma surgery thanks to its high success rate. Nevertheless, the procedure can be associated with major intraoperative and postoperative complications. In order to define a safer and more effective operation, during the last 20 years many alternatives to trabeculectomy have been proposed. Over the years, a growing body of evidence suggests that ‘non-penetrating glaucoma surgery’ (NPGS) is successful at lowering intraocular pressure and can be considered as a surgical option for glaucoma1,2. NPGS is represented by ‘deep sclerectomy’(DS) and by ‘Viscocanalostomy’(VC) (which was introduced by R. Stegmann in the early 1990); they are based on original studies by Krasnov (1972) and Zimmerman (1984) on ‘non-penetrating trabeculectomy’. Similarly, both procedures aim to lower intraocular pressure (IOP) by draining aqueous humor from the anterior chamber not through a patent scleral opening, but by slow percolation through the inner trabecular meshwork and/or Descemet’s membrane (the ‘sclerodescemetic membrane’) (Fig. 38.1). This avoids sudden IOP fall, hypotony, and a flat anterior chamber. The absence of anterior chamber opening and iridectomy limits inflammation and the risk of cataract and intraocular infection. Compared with deep sclerectomy, viscocanalostomy has significant advantages; it aims not only to be non-penetrating like deep sclerectomy, but also to restore the physiological outflow pathway, thus avoiding any external filtration. This would make the success of the procedure independent of conjunctival or episcleral scarring, a leading cause of failure in trabeculectomy, with fewer indications for wound healing modulation. Moreover, the absence of a filtering bleb avoids related ocular discomfort. In addition, the procedure can be carried out in any quadrant. A technical variation of viscocanalostomy, was recently introduced, named ‘canaloplasty’ (CP), aimed at a better and controlled dilation of Schlemm’s canal.

Deep sclerectomy

Indications for surgery

Deep sclerectomy is indicated in eyes with IOP uncontrolled despite maximal tolerable medical therapy and/or laser trabeculoplasty, or with poor adherence to prescriptions.

Based on its high safety profile and on its mechanism of action, deep sclerectomy is indicated in primary open angle, pseudoexfoliative, and pigmentary glaucomas. Being non-penetrating, it can be useful particularly in aphakic eyes with vitreous in the anterior chamber, or in-patients where a sudden drop in IOP or long-lasting hypotony should be avoided, such as eyes with uncontrolled high pressure, eyes with high myopia, or even eyes with very advanced glaucoma. The procedure was also found to be effective in uveitic glaucoma3.

Specific contraindications are conditions which can impair aqueous filtration through the sclerodescemetic membrane: angle closure glaucoma, extensive peripheral anterior synechiae in the surgical quadrant, neovascular glaucoma, and iridocorneal endothelial (ICE) syndrome. Eyes with diffuse scarring in the surgical quadrant secondary to trauma or previous surgeries might have damaged sclera and non-functional trabecular meshwork and Schlemm’s canal. This increases both difficulty and the risk of complications. Similarly, eyes treated by argon laser trabeculoplasty are more at risk for ruptures of the sclerodescemetic membrane, which often requires conversion into trabeculectomy. There is no information as to whether eyes that have undergone selective laser trabeculoplasty share this risk.

Operation technique

For good exposure of the surgical area, place a traction suture in the cornea or under the superior rectus. Raise a fornix-based conjunctival flap in the upper quadrant and lightly cauterize superficial blood vessels carefully, so as to preserve collector channels and to avoid scleral shrinkage and damage to Schlemm’s canal. Dissect a 5 × 5 mm superficial flap, approximately ⅓ scleral thickness, and advance anteriorly into clear cornea for about 1–1.5 mm (Fig. 38.3). To make the deep sclerokeratectomy, dissect a second 4 × 4 mm deep scleral flap. The dissection should be just deep enough to leave a thin layer of sclera (50–100 µm) over the choroid and the ciliary body with a dark reflex just visible below the scleral fibers. Start the deep sclerectomy posteriorly and carry it anteriorly until Schlemm’s canal is deroofed (Fig. 38.4). Advance the dissection into clear cornea to create the sclerodescemetic membrane, the site of aqueous filtration. Deepen the two lateral radial cuts and advance into clear cornea without touching the anterior trabeculum or Descemet’s membrane. By gently pulling the deep scleral flap with forceps and with counter traction on the bed of the canal using a triangular cellulose sponge, detach the anterior portion of the deep flap from the anterior trabecular meshwork and from Descemet’s membrane. Advance this 1–1.5 mm anteriorly. At this stage, there should be aqueous percolation through the membrane. To optimize outflow, peel the internal wall of Schlemm’s canal (the juxta-canalicular trabeculum and the canal endothelium) by grabbing it with thin forceps (‘external trabeculectomy’) (Fig. 38.5). This removes a homogeneous external trabecular membrane in one coherent plane and allows aqueous humor to egress through the remaining inner trabecular layers. Excise the deep flap by cutting it anteriorly.

To maintain the created space (‘intrascleral lake’ or ‘decompression chamber’) and to avoid postoperative scarring, different implants are used4. Absorbable porcine collagen implant (Aquaflow™, Staar surgical AG, Nidau, Switzerland), reticulate hyaluronic acid implant (HealaFlow™, Anteis, Geneve, CH), non absorbable implant (T Flux™, Ioltech Laboratoires, La Rochelle, France) or PMMA implant (Homdec SA, Belmont, Switzerland) can be sutured or positioned in the intrascleral space (Fig. 38.6).

Reposition and suture the superficial scleral flap with two loose 10-0 nylon sutures, and finally close the conjunctiva tightly.

Before dissecting the deep scleral flap or just after opening Schlemm’s canal, in all or in selected cases, some surgeons apply a sponge soaked with mitomycin C (0.1–0.3 mg/ml) over the sclera for 1 to 3 minutes, to minimize excessive scarring, so as to increase the success rate.

Intraoperative complications

The two most common intraoperative complications are the inability to find Schlemm’s canal and perforation of the sclerodescemetic membrane. These complications are most common during the initial learning phase on the first 15–20 cases, where they can affect up to 30% of operated eyes. This falls to 3% with experience5. Inability to find the canal relates to an improper dissection of the deep scleral flap. Usually, fear of being too close to the choroid causes the surgeon to be too superficial, thus dissecting over the top of the canal. Generally, a careful deepening of the deep scleral flap suffices to reach and open the canal. Sclerodescemetic membrane ruptures can be as small as little holes or linear and transverse. Small ruptures without iris prolapse have no consequence. With shallow or flat anterior chambers, the external flap should be sutured tightly (consider releasable sutures). Long ruptures of Descemet’s membrane mostly occur at the junction with the anterior trabeculum, and are followed by iris prolapse. An iridectomy is always required with a conversion to trabeculectomy. This can be done by re-suturing into position the internal flap (in order to cover the rupture), and by doing a sclerectomy in its anterior portion. The superficial flap can then be sutured as in standard trabeculectomy. This complication is more common in eyes previously treated with argon laser trabeculoplasty.

Postoperative complications

Deep sclerectomy is a safe procedure, affected by few complications. Expect early hypotony with IOPs around 5 mmHg on the first postoperative day; it is a positive prognostic factor. If there is no perforation, hypotony is short lasting, the anterior chamber remains deep, and small peripheral choroidal effusions might be observed in up to 5% of eyes. Small hyphemas, mostly secondary to blood reflux from Schlemm’s canal, are sometimes seen and are mostly associated with hypotony. IOPs spikes can occur for several reasons: an insufficient surgical dissection of the sclerodescemetic membrane (detectable during surgery by lack of aqueous filtration), which can be resolved with laser goniopuncture; an iris prolapsed through an undetected membrane tear, which can be treated with miotics and iridotomy or iridoplasty, or with a surgical iridectomy; a transient hemorrhage under the scleral flap not requiring any intervention; a steroid induced response (generally after several weeks of treatment), which is solved by halting the medication; and finally very rarely malignant glaucoma, which must be treated medically and/or surgically. As in penetrating surgery, wound leaks with a positive Seidel test can occur with inadequate conjunctival closure, especially if anti-metabolites were used. This complication is less frequent with NPGS than with trabeculectomy. Early or late failure of the procedure, from excessive scarring, is more likely in high risk eyes. As in trabeculectomy, the success rate can be increased by using intraoperative anti-metabolites or by treating the operated eye with needling and/or subconjunctival anti-metabolite injections.

A progressive increase in IOP can be observed in up to 60% of the cases during the first year postoperatively, related to a decrease of permeability of the sclerodescemetic membrane. This complication, most frequent 6–8 months after surgery, must be treated with Nd:YAG goniopuncture. The aiming beam is focused on the semi-transparent trabecular–Descemet’s membrane, which often has a concave appearance, through a gonioscopic contact lens. In the free running Q-switched mode with a power of 4–8 mJ, 4–5 YAG laser shots are applied. This will create small holes in the membrane increasing its permeability and thus lowering IOP.

Even if rare, blebitis can occur, but endophthalmitis has not yet been reported. Few cases of implant migration into the anterior chamber have occurred. This complication might occur in eyes with a perforated membrane and without, or with inadequate, fixation of the implant to the scleral bed. Cataract may occur late, but with a significantly lower incidence than that following trabeculectomy6,7. Scleral ectasia has been seen occasionally.

Results of surgery

Reported results vary from different follow-ups and techniques. In 2004, a meta-analysis of 29 articles found deep sclerectomy yielded an IOP <21 mmHg without medications in 69.7% of eyes without implant, 59.4% with collagen implant, and 71.1% with reticulated hyaluronic acid implant. No significant differences were found between the three techniques8. In 2008, a meta-analysis reported an IOP <21 mmHg in 68.7% of eyes after deep sclerectomy with implant, 48.6% after deep sclerectomy without implant, and 67.1% after deep sclerectomy with anti-metabolites (with or without implant)9. While this confirmed a higher success rate with a collagen implant, the role of anti-metabolites was confusing, in part because it included surgeries performed with different anti-metabolites (intraoperative mitomycin C, and intraoperative or postoperative 5-fluorouracil) and operations with and without implants. Randomized controlled studies comparing deep sclerectomy with and without mitomycin C (MMC) showed a better outcome when the anti-metabolite was used. Kozobolis et al. showed a success rate (IOP <22 mmHg without medications) of 72.5% without MMC and 95% with MMC, without significant different complication rates between the groups10. Neudorfer et al. reported a mean IOP decrease at 24 months of 48% and of 32% in the MMC and no-MMC groups respectively11.

When compared with trabeculectomy, randomized controlled studies, even if consistently showing a better safety profile for deep sclerectomy, do not agree on which procedure provides the better outcome. This relates to factors such as differences in technique, surgical experience, the use of anti-metabolites, and the use of goniopuncture. Overall, trabeculectomy provides lower IOP than deep sclerectomy , but when goniopuncture and/or anti-metabolites are added to DS, most studies show similar final IOP and success rates1215.

Viscocanalostomy and canaloplasty

Operation techniques

The surgical steps of viscocanalostomy and canaloplasty are mostly the same as deep sclerectomy. The conjunctival flap, the superficial and deep scleral flaps, and the sclerodescemetic membrane are as described for deep sclerectomy. During these steps, cautery should be minimized to prevent damage to Schlemm’s canal and collector channels; in dissecting the internal scleral flap, Schlemm’s canal needs to be fully opened and deroofed leaving two patent and clean ostia on the lateral edges of the cut.

Unlike in deep sclerectomy, dilation of Schlemm’s canal is the critical part of the procedure.

During viscocanalostomy, using the specific 165 µm cannula, high molecular weight sodium hyaluronate is slowly injected into Schlemm’s canal through the two ostia at the lateral edges of the inner flap (Fig. 38.7). To avoid damage to the canal endothelium, do not insert the cannula more than 1–1.5 mm from the ostia. The slow injection should be repeated 6–7 times on each side to avoid tears and ruptures of the canal.

During canaloplasty, a 200 µm microcatheter with a 250 µm distal tip incorporating an illuminating optical fiber is inserted into Schlemm’s canal through its open ostium. The catheter is gently pushed through the canal until its tip exits from the contralateral ostia (Fig. 38.8). A 10-0 prolene suture is tied to the distal tip and the catheter is withdrawn, pulling the suture into and along the canal. While withdrawing, 4–6 mg of sodium hyaluronate 1.4% should be injected every 2 hours. Once the suture has been pulled right around, it is cut from the catheter and tied to form a tight loop encircling Schlemm’s canal. This technique provides both viscodilation and a tensioning of the inner wall of the canal20.

To prevent trabecular ruptures, a paracentesis to lower IOP, is made before the cannulation of the canal both during viscocanalostomy and canaloplasty.

In contrast with DS, the superficial flap is sutured watertight to avoid external filtration. To seal the ‘intrascleral chamber’, the outer scleral flap is sutured with 6 or 7 10-0 nylon stitches. The different sizes of the two flaps allows a tight apposition of the external flap (Fig. 38.9). Finally, to minimize bleeding and to prevent collapse and scarring, high molecular weight sodium hyaluronate is injected underneath the flap (Fig. 38.10).

An implant has not been shown to benefit the outcome of viscocanaloplasty and canaloplasty. This probably relates to the differences in the mechanisms of action between the procedures.

Postoperative complications

Viscocanaloplasty is safe with the few postoperative side effects mainly related to intraoperative technical complications. Postoperative management is less demanding with significantly less refractive change21 and eye discomfort than trabeculectomy22, as could be expected given the absence of a filtering bleb in most cases. Postoperative complications are similar to deep sclerectomy. Since viscocanalostomy is mostly independent of external filtration, excessive healing does not affect the outcome and does not require any specific intervention. Viscocanalostomy, due to its different mechanisms of action, requires fewer goniopunctures compared with deep sclerectomy.

Canaloplasty can be affected by suture extrusion through the trabecular meshwork into the anterior chamber20.

References

1 European Glaucoma Society: 3. Treatment principles and options. In Terminology and Guidelines for Glaucoma, 3rd edn, Savona: Editrice Dogma; 2008:155.

2 Carassa RG, Goldberg I. Non penetrating glaucoma drainage surgery. In: Weinreb RN, Crowston JG, editors. Glaucoma surgery. Open Angle Glaucoma. The Hague: Kugler; 2005:91-106.

3 Auer C, Mermoud A, Herbort CP. Deep sclerectomy for the management of uncontrolled uveitic glaucoma: preliminary data. Klin Monatsbl Augenheilkd. 2004;221:339-342.

4 Mendrinos E, Mermoud A, Shaarawy T. Nonpenetrating glaucoma surgery. Surv Ophthalmol. 2008;53:592-630.

5 Sanchez E, Schnyder CC, Mermoud A. Comparative results of deep sclerectomy transformed to trabeculectomy and classical trabeculectomy. Klin Monatsbl Augenheilkd. 1997;210:261-264.

6 Karlen ME, Sanchez E, Schnyder CC. Deep sclerectomy with collagen implant: medium term results. Br J Ophthalmol. 1999;83:6-11.

7 Shaarawy T, Karlen M, Schnyder C. Five-year results of deep sclerectomy with collagen implant. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2001;27:1770-1778.

8 Cheng JW, Ma XY, Wei RL. Efficacy of non-penetrating trabecular surgery for open angle glaucoma: a meta analysis. Chin Med J. 2004;117:1006-1010.

9 Hondur A, Onol M, Hasanreisoglu B. Nonpenetrating glaucoma surgery: meta-analysis of recent results. J Glaucoma. 2008;17:139-146.

10 Kozobolis VP, Christodoulakis EV, Tzanakis N, et al. Primary deep sclerectomy versus primary deep sclerectomy with the use of mitomycin C in primary open-angle glaucoma. J Glaucoma. 2002;11:287-293.

11 Neudorfer M, Sadetzki S, Anisimova S, et al. Nonpenetrating deep sclerectomy with the use of adjunctive mitomycin C. Ophthalmic Surg Lasers Imaging. 2002;35:6-12.

12 Mermoud A, Schnyder C, Sickenberg M, et al. Comparison of deep sclerectomy with collagen implant and trabeculectomy in open angle glaucoma. J Cataract Refract Surg. 1999;25:323-331.

13 Wang N, Wu H, Ye T Chen X, et al. Analysis of intraoperative and early post-operative complications and safety in non penetrating trabecular surgery. Zhonghua Yan Ke Za Zhi. 2002;38:329-334.

14 Schwenn O, Springer C, Troost A, et al. Deep sclerectomy using hyaluronate implant versus trabeculectomy. A comparison of two glaucoma operations using mitomycin C. Ophthalmologe. 2004;101:696-704.

15 Cillino S, Di Pace F, Casuccio A, et al. Deep sclerectomy versus punch trabeculectomy: effect of low-dosage mitomycin C. Ophthalmologica. 2005;219:281-286.

16 Tamm ER, Carassa RG, Albert DM, et al. Viscocanalostomy in Rhesus monkeys. Arch Ophthalmol. 2004;122:1826-1828.

17 Miserocchi E, Carassa RG, Bettin P, et al. Viscocanalostomy in patients with uveitis: a preliminary report. J Cataract and Refr Surg. 2004;30:566-570.

18 Stangos AN, Whatham AR, Sunaric-Megevand G. Primary Viscocanalostomy for juvenile open-angle glaucoma. Am J Ophthalmol. 2005;140:490-496.

19 Noureddin BN, El-Haibi CP, Cheikha A, et al. Viscocanalostomy versus trabeculotomy ab externo in primary congenital glaucoma: 1-year follow-up of a prospective controlled pilot study. Br J Ophthalmol. 2006;90:1281-1285.

20 Lewis RA, von Wolff K, Tetz M, et al. Canaloplasty: circumferential viscodilation and tensioning of Schlemm’s canal using a flexible microcatheter for the treatment of open-angle glaucoma in adults. Interim clinical study analysis. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2007;33:1217-1226.

21 Egrilmez S, Ates H, Nalcaci S, et al. Surgically induced corneal refractive change following glaucoma surgery: nonpenetrating trabecular surgeries versus trabeculectomy. J Cat Refract Surg. 2004;30:1232-1239.

22 Carassa RG, Bettin P, Fiori M, et al. Viscocanalostomy versus Trabeculectomy in white adults affected by open-angle glaucoma: a 2-year randomized, controlled trial. Ophthalmology. 2003;110:882-887.

23 Jonescu-Cuypers C, Jacobi P, Konen W, et al. Primary viscocanalostomy versus trabeculectomy in white patients with open-angle glaucoma: A randomized clinical trial. Ophthalmology. 2001;108:254-258.

24 Luke C, Dietlein TS, Jacobi PC, et al. A prospective randomized trial of viscocanalostomy versus trabeculectomy in open-angle glaucoma: A 1-year follow-up study. J Glaucoma. 2002;11:294-299.

25 Lewis RA, von Wolff K, Tetz M, et al. Canaloplasty: circumferential viscodilation and tensioning of Schlemm’s canal using a flexible microcatheter for the treatment of open-angle glaucoma in adults. Two-year interim clinical study results. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2009;35:814-824.

26 O’Brart DSP, Rowlands E, Islam N, et al. A randomised, prospective study comparing trabeculectomy augmented with anti-metabolites with a viscocanalostomy technique for the management of open angle glaucoma uncontrolled by medical therapy. Br J Ophthalmol. 2002;86:748-754.

27 Yalvac IS, Sahin M, Eksioglu U, et al. Primary viscocanalostomy versus trabeculectomy for primary open-angle glaucoma: three-year prospective randomized clinical trial. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2004;30:2050-2057.

28 Yarangumeli A, Gureser S, Koz OG, et al. Viscocanalostomy versus trabeculectomy in patients with bilateral high tension glaucoma. Int Ophthalmol. 2004;25:207-213.

29 Gilmour DF, Manners TD, Devonport H, et al. Viscocanalostomy versus trabeculectomy for primary open angle glaucoma: 4-year prospective randomized clinical trial. Eye. 2009;23:1802-1807.