Neurology

Published on 21/03/2015 by admin

Filed under Pediatrics

Last modified 22/04/2025

Print this page

rate 1 star rate 2 star rate 3 star rate 4 star rate 5 star
Your rating: none, Average: 0 (0 votes)

This article have been viewed 2573 times

Chapter 13 Neurology

Long Cases

Background information

CP is a static encephalopathy—a non-progressive disorder of motion and/or posture, secondary to an insult in the developing brain. This excludes active degenerative progressive disorders. Despite its static nature, the peripheral manifestations may seem to progress and mimic progressive central nervous system pathology.

Classification

CP is classified according to the clinical type of neuromotor dysfunction:

Spastic diplegia is the most common subtype, and the underlying pathology is periventricular leucomalacia in most cases. Spasticity classically develops between 6 and 18 months. The most commonly affected muscles are the paraspinal muscles, hip flexors and adductors, hamstrings, gastrocnemius and soleus. Muscle spasticity and contractures can lead to bone and joint changes. Spastic hemiplegia is usually secondary to an infarct in the distribution of the middle cerebral artery. Spastic quadriplegia, or total body involvement CP, with bilateral cerebral infarction and multicystic encephalomalacia, can occur secondary to an hypoxic ischaemic insult in the late third trimester. Dyskinetic CP can be the result of an acute profound hypoxic insult in the third trimester, such as cord prolapse, ruptured uterus or massive antepartum haemorrhage; dyskinetic CP also may occur secondary to bilirubin encephalopathy/kernicterus, where there may be associated sensorineural deafness. Ataxic CP often is genetically determined, of prenatal onset; there are various forms with different modes of inheritance.

Causes

In around one third of cases, the underlying aetiology is unknown. Known causes can be classified into three groups:

Epidemiological studies show that in 90% of cases, the cause of CP could not be intrapartum hypoxia. In the remaining 10%, intrapartum signs consistent with hypoxic damage may have had maternal or intrapartum origins. Recommendations have been made that the term birth asphyxia should not be used, as it is inappropriate and inaccurate. Rather, the terms antenatal hypoxia and intrapartum hypoxia, concerning correct timing of damaging hypoxia, should be used. Similarly, the term hypoxic ischaemic encephalopathy is used loosely, in situations where hypoxia and ischaemia have not been proved; it should not be used in this manner.

Criteria have been developed defining acute intrapartum events sufficient to cause permanent neurological impairment:

Prevention of premature birth would decrease the incidence of CP; antenatal magnesium sulphate in women at high risk of preterm birth (before 34 weeks of gestation), may reduce cerebral palsy (but not mortality rate) in preterm infants born under 34 weeks’ gestation.

Diagnostic assessment

CP remains a clinical diagnosis, despite all the technology available today. Clinical findings should include delayed motor milestones, abnormal muscle tone (can be hypo- or hypertonic), hyperreflexia, and absence of regression or of a more specific diagnosis. A thorough history and physical examination should be all that is required to make the diagnosis; rarer conditions that may be treatable or progressive must not be missed; however, a routine laboratory ‘work-up’ to exclude CP ‘impersonators’ is difficult to justify, given their rarity. There are a number of conditions that can masquerade as CP as they evolve, but many are subjects of small case series or single case reports. Some units would include blood tests for thyroid function, lactate, pyruvate, organic and amino acids, chromosomes and other tests, depending on the clinical scenario.

Neuroimaging is more useful than any single pathology test; MRI will show abnormalities in about 90% of patients with CP, delineating pathology, helping determine whether injury was prenatal, perinatal or postnatal in onset, and helping exclude treatable causes, such as hydrocephalus, hamartomata or tumours. In premature babies, MRI finds abnormalities in 99% of cases, especially periventricular leucomalacia. Data from studies where 1384 children with CP underwent neuroimaging showed the rarity of underlying disorders: previously unsuspected metabolic disorders totalled 4%, and genetic disorders 2%.

EEGs are only worthwhile if the patient has had fits, to determine classification of any epilepsy syndrome; they are not useful in determining the aetiology of the child’s CP.

Exclusion of other diagnoses is important, as some of these unsuspected ‘impersonators’ of CP may be amenable to treatment (e.g. hydrocephalus can be treated with a shunt, subdural haematomata can be drained [the chance of finding a surgically treatable lesion by imaging CP patients is 5%], dopa-responsive dystonia responds to dopamine supplementation, hypothyroidism responds to thyroxine). Inborn errors of metabolism can impersonate CP, but a family history of neurological problems or unexplained infant deaths would point to a metabolic disorder, as would neurodevelopmental regression, or significant vomiting, hypoglycaemia or worsening seizures. There are several types of genetically determined ‘familial spastic paraplegias’. Progressive disorders should be ruled out clinically; if not screened for, they come to light with the passage of time, when a salient aspect becomes apparent. Examples of notable rare CP mimics include:

Candidates should be familiar with the Gross Motor Functional Classification System, which is widely used to clarify questions about walking:

Children with CP are more likely to have associated conditions in the following decreasing order of frequency: intellectual impairment (around 50%); epilepsy (around 45%); speech and language disorders, with additional oro-motor deficits (around 40%); ophthalmological defects (around 30%); hearing impairment (around 10–15%). Children with right-sided hemiplegia are more likely to have impaired language function due to left hemisphere injury. Intellectual impairment is more likely in the presence of epilepsy, an abnormal EEG or an abnormal neuroimaging study.

Most children with CP are born with the condition, but abnormal features may not be noted for months; most are diagnosed by 3 years. Diagnosis of CP before 12 months is fraught with uncertainty, due to the plasticity of the newborn brain; infants can be seen who have apparently clear-cut signs of CP that then resolve by the age of 1 or 2 years. The ‘ideal’ diagnostic age for CP may be 2 years.

For each child with CP, the above areas (classification, cause) should be defined, as well as functional severity and prognosis. The long-case presentation should address the major problems (a) as the parent sees them and (b) as the various caregivers (e.g. doctors) see them; the interpretations may be quite different.

It is advisable to cover areas that were of interest to the examiners when they took the history and examined the child (ask ‘What did the examiners ask about? What areas did they examine?’).

History

Important signs in examination of the child with CP

The procedure outlined below can be used for a long- or short-case examination. When presented in the long case, the examination of the child with CP should convey to the examiners an overall picture of the patient (e.g. ‘a profoundly intellectually handicapped microcephalic girl with spastic quadriplegia’) as the initial introduction.

In the short-case context, a wide number of introductions may be given; for example, ‘not walking’, ‘not developing as well as his siblings’, ‘has unusual movements’, ‘has a limp’, ‘wears out the tips of his shoes’, ‘has back arching’, or more directed introductions such as ‘This boy has cerebral palsy; please assess him for complications’, or ‘This girl was premature; please assess her for complications of prematurity’.

In the case of a child with hemiplegic CP, the lead-in may more likely be ‘Please examine this boy’s gait’ or ‘Please examine the peripheral nervous system’.

See the short case on hemiplegia in this chapter for a suggested examination procedure.

In each case, the initial 1–2 minutes spent standing back and inspecting should identify CP as the most likely problem and direct the examination accordingly.

Management

The management of CP is multifaceted and complex. It is beyond the scope of this section to give a comprehensive account of the various treatment modalities used. Rather, a list of the main treatment areas and issues is presented, as a framework around which to base further reading.

Physiotherapy, occupational therapy, splints/orthoses

These are important in maintaining range of movement and function of trunk and limbs, and preventing contractures. Physiotherapists (PTs) and occupational therapists (OTs) enable the child to perform the activities of daily living (ADLs) as well as his or her potential allows. They can evaluate whether there is a problem in the areas of dressing, washing, toileting, feeding, positioning, methods of carrying and lifting (which vary with the different types of CP), mobility aids, and whether the furniture and bathroom fittings at home are appropriate. As much as possible, therapeutic manoeuvres can be built into everyday activities (e.g. handling/feeding/playing in younger children; in older children, simple activities such as lying prone watching television for those with hip flexion contractures).

Serial casting is useful for reversing ankle/foot equinus in younger children. Over 2–6 weeks, the calf muscle is stretched gradually, with the foot and ankle held in position by a below-the-knee plaster.

Orthoses (splints) act as exoskeletons, assist with position and function, and may prevent contractures developing. Soft orthoses may be made from high-density foam, neoprene or lycra (e.g. more for low tone, good for flexed knees). Hard orthoses include solid (fixed) ankle–foot orthoses (AFOs), hinged (articulated) AFOs (allow dorsiflexion); in-shoe orthoses (e.g. supramalleolar orthoses [SMOs]).

The selection of orthoses is aided by computerised gait evaluation in gait laboratories (see below). The ankle–foot orthosis (AFO) is the most commonly used orthosis. It may prevent ankle deformity and improve gait pattern.

Splinting is of great value in the prevention of contractures. Muscles kept in a normal position for the majority of the day will grow normally. Night splinting is beneficial.

Three-dimensional (3-D) gait analysis: computerised gait laboratories

Examination of gait in CP patients in gait analysis laboratories can detect primary movement problems, differentiating them from secondary or coping manoeuvres. Assessment of the complex gait deviations, which occur in three planes of motion, can direct an interdisciplinary team’s clinical decisions as to the best course of treatment. This may be orthopaedic surgical intervention, or treatment that may be of more direct benefit than surgery, including orthotics, botulinum toxin A (BTX-A) therapy (see below) or PT.

Optical/reflective markers are placed at specific anatomical landmarks/limb segments, and as the child walks the 3-D location is detected by multiple infrared cameras. Gait analysis usually includes clinical lower limb examination, videotaped walking, measurement of limb segment motion (kinematics), and measurement of forces and moments causing that motion (kinetics). This includes 3-D joint motion at ankle, hip and knee; joint mobility; joint angular velocities; joint powers; gait parameters such as step, stride length and cadence; synchronised dynamic electromyography (EMG); ground reaction forces and foot pressure analysis. Children walk on a force plate to assess the amount of power generated. The energy cost of walking is also assessed: oxygen consumption, respiratory function and heart rate can be measured with a portable telemetric system. Most units have specific referral criteria, which may include being ambulatory (with or without aids) for at least 10 steps, being at least 4 years old, cooperative, and at least 100 cm tall.

Management of spasticity

In 2010, the American Academy of Neurology released an evidence-based review of pharmacological treatments for childhood spasticity due to CP, where a multidisciplinary panel reviewed relevant literature from 1966 to 2008. In the case of localised/segmental spasticity that warrants treatment, the AAN recommendation was that botulinum toxin A (BTX-A) is effective and generally safe in reducing spasticity in the upper and lower extremities, but there is conflicting evidence regarding functional improvement, and severe generalised weakness can occur; there is insufficient data to support or refute BTX-A use to improve motor function. There is insufficient data to support or refute other medications used for the same indication (and these are not discussed further): phenol, alcohol and BTX type B. In the case of generalised spasticity that warrants treatment, the AAN recommendation was that diazepam could be considered for short-term treatment, and also tizanidine may be considered; but, again, there is insufficient data to support or refute other medications used for the same indication: dantrolene, oral baclofen or continuous intrathecal baclofen. The latter is discussed because patients who have received this treatment may present in the examination, so a candidate should have some knowledge of the side effects.

Botulinum toxin A (BTX-A)

BTX-A is a neurotoxin produced by Clostridium botulinum, given by intramuscular (IM) injection, and taken up by endocytosis at cholinergic nerve terminals at the motor endplate, preventing release of acetylcholine from these terminals, which leads to a prolonged, reversible relaxation of skeletal muscle. There are seven serotypes (A–G) of botulinum toxin; types A, B and F have been used clinically. BTX-A causes local paralysis in the injected muscle with an onset within 1–3 days of the IM injection. Duration of action is 3–6 months, by which time motor nerves generate new neuromuscular junctions by terminal sprouting, and there is then a clinical return of spasticity (from 12–16 weeks in most patients). Injections then may be repeated.

BTX-A injected locally, is well established as the standard treatment for reducing hypertonicity of muscles in children with spastic CP. The indication for use is dynamic contracture in the absence of a fixed deformity. Muscles typically targeted include the gastrocnemius–soleus complex, the tibialis posterior (to relieve equinovarus), the hamstrings (to relieve crouch gait), the adductors (improves positioning and perineal access for hygiene), the rectus femoris (to relieve flexed stiff knee gait) and the iliopsoas (to relieve dynamic deformity of hip flexion during gait). Decreased spasticity in the iliopsoas and adductors may modify the natural history of subluxation or dislocation of the hip. BTX-A is useful for correcting gait abnormalities and for reducing the need for orthopaedic surgery. BTX-A may be used in the upper limbs as well as the lower. It may decrease muscle spasm after soft-tissue releases.

BTX-A is well tolerated, but there are several potential side effects. BTX-A can diffuse intra-axonally and across fascial planes, causing distant side effects. Side effects can be gait-related, including deterioration in walking, local weakness, unsteadiness, increased falls, and fatigue. Other side effects have included aspiration pneumonia (impaired pharyngeal function from systemic spread of small amounts of BTX-A), local pain, worsening of strabismus, dysphagia, muscle atrophy, global weakness, and incontinence of urine and faeces. Drug interactions include non-depolarising muscle relaxants and aminoglycosides, causing potentiation of neuromuscular blockade. Other disadvantages include the cost and need for repeated injections. The neuromuscular junctions that are blocked are the same as those that cause meaningful movement. BTX-A may reveal underlying weakness or cause weakness by ‘overcorrection’, and 6 weeks later there will be a return of strength/function, but without the presenting problem. There have been very rare reports of intermittent tetraparesis after treatment. It may be used for relief of rigidity, but the effects in the extrapyramidal forms of CP are not so dramatic.

The majority of patients using BTX-A for treating spasticity demonstrate objective improvement in tone and function. Kinematic parameters of gait are improved in lower limb spasticity. Integrated multilevel BTX-A has a similar effect to a medical rhizotomy.

Orthopaedic procedures

Gastrointestinal (GIT) problems: dysphagia and nutritional issues

Up to two thirds of children with CP have disorders of GIT motility. Significant GIT symptoms include constipation (delayed colonic transit, especially of proximal colon, poor muscle tone, inadequate feeding, prolonged immobility), swallowing disorders (especially dysfunction of the oral and/or pharyngeal phase of swallowing, from corticobulbar dysfunction), vomiting and/or regurgitation (delay in gastric emptying, abnormal oesophageal motility, gastro-oesophageal reflux disease [GORD]), abdominal pain (due to GORD-associated oesophagitis or constipation) and respiratory symptoms due to chronic pulmonary aspiration, secondary to GORD. GIT symptoms are not related to specific types of CP.

Children with CP often fail to thrive, due to GORD and/or impairment of swallowing. Work-up for GORD may include endoscopy and biopsy, pH studies, barium studies and nuclear medicine milk scan. Endoscopy results: usually around 40–50% will show oesophagitis, 40–50% will be normal, and the remainder may have H pylori, Barrett’s oesophagus or eosinophilic oesophagitis. Management of GORD may include acid suppression (proton pump inhibitors, or H2 antagonists), and antireflux surgery. There is no evidence to support efficacy in GORD for prokinetic agents or thickened feeds. Nissen fundoplication is uncomplicated in about 70%; complications can include gagging/retching, dumping, bloating and cyclic vomiting. In around 3%, a ‘re-do’ is needed.

Patients with CP who have fundoplication have similar rates of aspiration pneumonia to patients with CP who have gastrojejunal feeding tubes (both around 15%) and similar mortality.

Those children with impaired swallowing and poor nutrition may require assessment and therapy by a dietician (assessing diet and increasing calories), speech therapist (altering consistency of food), physiotherapist (positioning during feeding), as well as nasogastric tube feeding, gastrojejunal feeding tube and placement of a gastrostomy. Post gastrostomy placement, there is usually improved weight, height and skin fold thickness and a decrease in chest infections, but no change in hospitalisation rates.

Dystrophinopathies: Duchenne muscular dystrophy (DMD)

DMD is the most common childhood form of muscular dystrophy and the most severe end of the spectrum of muscle diseases termed the dystrophinopathies. The natural (untreated) history of DMD comprises: delayed milestones (sitting, standing), mean age of walking 18 months, mean age of diagnosis 5 years, proximal skeletal muscle weakness and waddling gait with difficulty climbing stairs, wheelchair bound by 12 years. Becker muscular dystrophy (BMD) is a less severe form of dystrophinopathy, with later-onset skeletal muscle weakness, and preserved neck flexor muscle strength (unlike DMD), patients remaining ambulatory until their 20s. Wheelchair dependency occurs in DMD before 13 years, whereas it occurs in BMD after 16 years; this differentiates the two. There is a third clinically important dystrophinopathy, where cardiac muscle is primarily affected, DMD-associated dilated cardiomyopathy (DCM). This is a distinct entity where males present between 20 and 40 with cardiac failure; female carriers of DMD mutations are at risk of this DCM.

Boys with DMD are often subjects for the long-case examination. Genetic counselling and prenatal diagnosis are likely discussion areas in the management of the DMD long case.

Background information: genetics of DMD

DMD is an X-linked recessive disorder, due to mutations (often deletions) in the dystrophin gene on the X chromosome (Xp21.2). It has a frequency of 1 in 3600–6000 male births. The DMD gene is the largest known human gene. It is around 2000 kilobases in size and codes for dystrophin, a large, rod-like 427-kD protein containing 3685 amino acids and located at the inner face of the muscle cell membrane. Dystrophin binds with a group of ‘dystrophin-associated proteins’ (DAPs) (e.g. sarcoglycans, dystroglycans, merosin) that span the muscle membrane, linking the muscle cytoskeleton and the extracellular matrix (see Figure 13.1). Absence of dystrophin disrupts the link, making the muscle membrane susceptible to damage from shearing stresses. Hence, dystrophin-deficient muscle is very susceptible to muscle injury, and degeneration of muscle fibres is a feature of dystrophic muscle. Dystrophin is undetectable in the muscle of DMD patients. Virtually all males with DMD have identifiable mutations. Over 4700 mutations in the DMD gene have been identified. Disease-causing alleles can include deletion of the complete gene, deletion or duplication of exons, small deletions, insertions and single base changes. Around two thirds of patients with DMD have intragenic out-of-frame (gross rearrangements) deletions, and around 10% have duplications of one or more exons of the gene; the remaining 25% have point mutations or other small rearrangements, including intronic deletions, insertions of repetitive sequences and splice site mutations. Generally out-of-frame mutations cause lack of dystrophin (and DMD), whereas in-frame mutations cause abnormal but partially functional dystrophin, resulting in BMD. The tissue distribution of dystrophin correlates with clinical features. It is found in skeletal, cardiac and smooth muscle, and results in skeletal muscle weakness and cardiomyopathy. In DMD-associated DCM, dystrophin expression is abnormal in myocardium, but may be normal or mildly abnormal in skeletal muscle. Dystrophin is found within the central nervous system, resulting in a static encephalopathy and cognitive deficits. Various forms of dystrophin are expressed in neurons and glia in the brain, especially the cortex, hippocampus, cerebellum and retina. Molecular genetic testing of DMD can confirm diagnosis of a dystrophinopathy without need for muscle biopsy in most patients ith DMD or BMD. There is a high incidence of new mutations, and two thirds of new patients have no positive family history.

image

Figure 13.1 Subsarcolemmal cytoskeleton.

Redrawn from; South, Isaacs, Roberton 2007. Practical Paediatrics 6th edition, p. 609, Figure 17.3.4.

Recent advances

In the last few years, the natural history of this disease has been changed by interventions (e.g. steroids, cardiac, respiratory, orthopaedic, rehabilitative), quality of life has improved and affected patients may now reach their fourth decade (a significant advance on the previous life expectancy of 19 years). Research into DMD has continued to accelerate, with a number of different treatment strategies being proposed. The role of steroids has become clearer. Glucocorticoids remain the only medication currently available that can slow down the decrease in muscle strength and function in DMD; this then reduces scoliosis and stabilises respiratory function. Low-dose steroids are very useful when boys are still walking, to improve motor function. The time of commencement of steroids remains controversial; currently, recommendations are to wait until identifying a plateau in the child’s motor development, where there is no longer progress in motor skills. Once that plateau is identified, steroids are commenced; they are not recommended for children still gaining motor skills, especially under 2 years. Typically, an affected male will progress with motor skills until 4–6 years old. Presently (2010), corticosteroid therapy is the treatment of choice for affected patients between 5 and 15 years of age. Some studies, however, suggest that the ideal window for treatment could be under 5 years. These patients need close monitoring, adjusting dose and timing to avoid unwanted side effects, especially weight gain.

It has been established that prednisone is effective in achieving delay in disease progression, prolongation of ability to walk, maintenance of strength and function, delay in, or prevention of, development of scoliosis, and preservation of respiratory function by attenuating fibrosis of the diaphragm. The precise mechanism by which prednisone exerts a therapeutic effect is unknown, but it is hypothesised that it is via a stabilising effect on muscle membranes. Prednisone is immunosuppressive, and also has direct effects on muscle cells. It can modulate proteolysis and calcium handling, increase myogenesis and inhibit apoptosis. A dose of 0.75 mg/kg per day can increase muscle strength within 10 days of commencement, and this effect can be maintained for 2 years. The recommended schedule is daily steroid dosing, although other regimens have been used, including 10 days on, 10 days off, alternate daily doses or weekly high doses (5–10 mg/kg per week; Lancet guidelines by Bushby et al). Side effects include weight gain, Cushingoid features, hypertension, osteoporosis, hyperglycaemia, easy bruising and usually transient behavioural problems. The side effects can preclude its ongoing use, although dose reductions (down to 0.3 mg/kg per day), alternative dosing regimens or nocte dosing may overcome these problems. Prednisolone or prednisone can be used. Another steroid that is as effective as prednisolone in maintaining muscle strength and function is deflazacort, a methyloxazoline derivative of prednisone. Deflazacort (DFZ) also enhances cardiac and pulmonary function and attenuates the development of scoliosis, including when ambulation is lost. DFZ may cause less severe adverse side effects (e.g. less weight gain) than prednisone. DFZ is not freely available in Australia, but is used on a case-by-case basis by some neuromuscular specialists.

A number of therapeutic approaches are being developed for DMD, but most of these are still at the experimental stage in animal models. Gene therapy trials using new-generation adenovirus carriers known as ‘stealth’ or ‘gutted’ vectors (containing no original viral genes) are being developed to overcome the obstacle of the immune system. Work proceeds on alternative strategies to replace the defective dystrophin gene in DMD patients. These include ‘exon skipping’, where synthetic RNA is used to restore the genetic code to produce partially functioning dystrophin, thereby converting DMD into BMD; and ‘utrophin upregulation’, which attempts to increase muscle cell production of ‘utrophin’, a protein related to dystrophin, which can substitute or compensate for it if made in sufficient amounts.

Primitive stem cells in bone marrow have been shown to migrate into muscle and become new muscle cells. Stem cell therapy is under investigation but still experimental. Gentamicin has been found to permit cells to ignore an abnormal stop codon in the dystrophin gene and to proceed and synthesise the protein in the 15% of DMD patients who have premature stop codons as their underlying mutation. PTC124 is a new agent that may permit ribosomal read through of nonsense mutations. Morpholino antisense oligonucleotides permit exon skipping.

Pharmacological approaches to develop a drug that can maintain muscles and function for a finite time are being explored, as they may be developed more rapidly than gene therapy techniques. Therapies under investigation include the anabolic steroid oxandrolone, which increases skeletal muscle myosin synthesis.

History

Ask about the following.

Examination

Gait

Ask the child to walk normally. Focus on each component of the gait in turn, starting at the feet (foot drop due to weak tibialis anterior, inversion due to strong tibialis posterior and weak peroneals, heels off ground partly due to tightened tendo achilles, higher step to gait than normal). Next, inspect the knees (weakened quadriceps leading to knee-locking gait, where the knee is snapped back into extension quickly for stability) and then the hips (weakened hip flexors require rotation of the upper body to enable the leg to swing forward; weakened hip abductors, the gluteus medius, cause tilting of the pelvis down on the unsupported side with each step during walking—Trendelenberg’s gait; weakened hip extensors, the gluteus maximus and hamstrings, lead to a forward pelvic tilt and marked lordosis to maintain the centre of gravity). Overall, the gait also has a wide base and the appearance of waddling.

Proceed with the other components of a full gait examination, including asking the child to run, hop, jump, squat and rise, walk up stairs, step on to a stool or chair, and do a sit-up and a push-up.

Boys with DMD can walk well on their toes, but are unable to walk on their heels, and if they try they end up inverting the feet. On squatting, these children are slow to return to standing, need to extend the knee before the hip, and lean on their thighs to assist extension at the hip.

Of particular importance is the elicitation of Gower’s sign. The boy is asked to lie supine on the floor and then to get up. This first leads to rolling over to be prone (he cannot sit up because of weak neck and spine flexion), then on to the knees, then on ‘all fours’—that is, hands and feet—then ‘climbing up’ the legs to stand. Gower’s sign is often used as a functional timed test: timing how long it takes to arise from the floor is useful to monitor deterioration over time. See Figure 13.2.

Management

The management of a child with Duchenne muscular dystrophy is very complex and has much relevance to managing other chronic conditions, particularly other neuromuscular diagnoses such as the spinal muscular atrophies.

A team approach is appropriate in the management of DMD. A hospital-based team would usually comprise a neurologist, geneticist, respiratory physician, cardiologist, orthopaedic surgeon, physiotherapist, occupational therapist, orthotist, clinical nurse coordinator and social worker. The local paediatrician’s (i.e. the candidate’s) role, in the case of a child under the care of a muscle clinic team, includes keeping in full contact with the team regarding changes in medical care, being available to coordinate overall medical care and dealing with any problems that arise between clinic visits, such as managing intercurrent infections. Perhaps the general practitioner or paediatrician should be the principal advisor/counsellor, although this is seldom the case: the candidate may have views on this issue.

The main management areas are described below.

Psychosocial

1. Education of parents and patient. Clarification of misinformation from other sources requires multiple informative sessions with the various disciplines involved in the comprehensive management of these patients. Regular feedback is needed to ensure that no misunderstandings occur. Other family members (e.g. siblings, grandparents, aunts, uncles and cousins) are often very much involved emotionally and tend to be neglected.

2. Expectation of a grief reaction to the diagnosis and its implications. Preparatory explanation to parents of probable feelings such as guilt, anger and depression. Explanation regarding any misapprehensions or strange beliefs about the nature of the illness.

3. Ensuring sufficient social supports, both from professionals (such as social workers) and non-professionals (such as other affected patients, families of other patients and groups such as the Muscular Dystrophy Association [MDA], Montrose Access [Qld] or Northcott [NSW]). The MDA provides parents’ groups and a useful handbook that deals with the home situation, recreational activities, education and vocational possibilities. There are excellent sites on the internet, including http://mdausa.org>and <http://www.treat-nmd.eu/patients/DMD/family guide/

4. Informing about financial assistance measures, such as any government benefits (which may assist directly with the child’s care, transport costs, accommodation costs and provision of aids). The illness places a very large financial burden for home modification (such as ramps, bathroom modification, lifting machines) on the family.

5. Discussion of treatment difficulties (such as non-compliance), seeking other opinions, and understanding and acceptance of alternative therapies sought by parents.

6. A major point is helping the family to determine how various people (especially the affected son) are to be informed. The paediatrician may not be the person who will help most, but he or she does have responsibility to ensure that it is done adequately. The consequences of failure in this aspect of management may include: parents who will not discuss the disease with their son, siblings, teachers or each other; one parent (usually the father) who withdraws from reality; and help being refused (because the parents believe that the child will be cured by divine intervention).

Therapies, orthoses and orthopaedic surgery

Scoliosis management

1. Scoliosis commonly develops around 13–15 years, usually in the thoracolumbar region, becoming most apparent after loss of walking, when in a wheelchair, and rapidly progresses during the pubertal growth spurt. This adversely affects respiratory function, appearance, body image, posture, feeding, sitting and comfort. The advent of corticosteroid treatment, leading to prolonged walking and increased truncal muscle strength, has also lead to a reduced incidence and severity in scoliosis.

2. An important area is fitness for surgery. Adequate presurgical assessment of respiratory function is essential (if respiratory function parameters are over 50% of predicted values for the child’s size, surgery is possible). Postoperatively, early mobilisation should be undertaken to prevent deterioration in function while confined to bed. The occupational therapist helps to accommodate activities of daily living to increase sitting height (increased shoulder and elbow height) and rigid spine.

3. In any surgical procedure, neuromuscular depolarising agents such as succinylcholine must be avoided.

Common medical problems

Restrictive lung disease (RLD)

1. RLD is secondary to weakness of the diaphragm, chest wall and abdominal musculature. In teenage years, this is associated with worsening respiratory reserve and sleep hypoventilation, episodes of REM-sleep-related hypoxaemia and obstructive sleep apnoea.

2. Patients tend to have recurrent chest infections, which should be treated aggressively, as they can tip these boys into overt respiratory failure. They may also require inhaled treatment (nebuliser or pressurised metered dose inhaler with spacer) with bronchodilators, mucolytics or antibiotics. They must not be exposed to tobacco smoke. They should be fully immunised, including receiving yearly influenza vaccine.

3. They may develop cor pulmonale secondary to hypoxia, due to ventilatory difficulties and ventilation–perfusion inequalities associated with scoliosis.

4. Monitor with regular (6-monthly) pulmonary function tests (PFTs), including forced vital capacity (FVC) and maximal inspiratory and expiratory pressure, the former reflecting diaphragmatic strength, the latter reflecting the strength of the chest wall and abdominal muscles, correlating with the ability to cough and clear secretions. FVC predicts the development of hypercapnia and survival. When the FVC falls below 50%, this is the time to consider non-invasive ventilation (NIV; see below). Other useful aspects of respiratory monitoring used to attempt to predict respiratory failure are: peak cough flows (PCFs), which measure the capacity for mucociliary clearance; maximum expiratory mouth pressure (MEP), which can measure effective cough capacity; and maximum inspiratory mouth pressure (MIP) testing, which can indicate the need to consider starting NIV. All these tests can be carried out after the age of 5 years. Sleep studies (overnight polysomnography) should be done when the patient is first in a wheelchair, or when he first exhibits symptoms of sleep disordered breathing (SDB) or hypoventilation.

5. Symptomatic respiratory failure can supervene, with hypoventilation, hypercapnoea (e.g. restless at night, somnolent by day, morning headaches, anorexia at breakfast, nausea, general malaise, fatigue, poor concentration at school, and cyanosis possibly occurring during meals or on transfer from the wheelchair). Untreated, hypercapnoea can prove fatal within a year. Symptoms can resolve with nocturnal ventilatory support, such as bimodal positive airway pressure (BiPAP), a mode of positive pressure ventilation.

6. In the last few years, domiciliary non-invasive ventilation (NIV) has been proven effective in relieving symptoms of OSA and hypercapnoea, improving quality of life and prolonging survival. A compact portable ventilator is used, with a snugly fitting face or nose mask; the requirement for a good face or lip seal on the mask or nasal/oral orthotic interface cannot be overemphasised. NIV corrects hypoventilation and OSA, and with cough assist devices, has extended average survival to the mid-twenties, and occasionally to the fourth decade. There is now a widely held view that withholding NIV from hypercapnoeic patients with DMD is unethical. The benefits of NIV at night, may lead, within a couple of years, to a decision about daytime support and then 24-hour ventilation.

7. Decisions about whether or not to go into long-term 24-hour ventilation have to be made in consultation with the respiratory physician, the parents and the teenage boy, with the decision based on patient and family preference. Some units point out that waiting for daytime hypercapnoea/ventilator failure, until suggesting daytime NIV, is unsafe, as it exposes the patient to the risk of a rapid deterioration should he be exposed to a minor viral respiratory tract infection. Education and early discussion of options are the keys.

8. Volume ventilators may be used when vital capacity is below 40% of normal. These use a soft plastic nasal or face mask (for connection to the airway), with Velcro head and chin straps to hold them in position. The ventilator can fit on a ventilator tray on the bottom of a powered wheelchair.

9. Eventually, a tracheostomy may be appropriate, as masks may cause skin irritation due to constant skin pressure. A Passy–Muir valve can allow air through the vocal cords and improve voicing. The respiratory support area remains a major current issue in management of DMD.

10. NIV use in DMD is usually considered if the patient has symptoms (e.g. fatigue, morning headache) and any of the following: PaCO2 of 45 mmHg or more; nocturnal oxygen saturation of below 88% for 5 minutes consecutively; maximal inspiratory pressure below 60 cmH2O, or FVC below 50% predicted. Long-term NIV has been shown to reduce respiratory tract infections and hospital admissions in children with neuromuscular disorders

11. The main determinant of operative risk in DMD is respiratory function.

12. The usual cause of death: the median age of death was 22 years in 2005; the mean age of survival has increased from 19 years, 10 years ago, to 27 years currently (2010), mainly due to NIV and corticosteroids.

Cardiac disease

Ninety per cent of patients with DMD (or BMD) have subclinical or clinical cardiomyopathy. Cardiomyopathy usually develops when the patient is confined to a wheelchair and hence inactive. Heart failure from loss of contractility and increased ventricular size is common. Cardiac involvement is the cause of death in 20% of patients with DMD (and 50% of patients with BMD). Ventricular remodelling can occur in patients with DMD (or BMD) if treated early enough with an ACE inhibitor (such as lisinopril or perindopril) and/or a beta blocker (such as metoprolol or carvedilol). If there is overt heart failure, digoxin and diuretics may be needed. This treatment can lead to normalisation of left ventricular size and systolic function.

Current research is assessing whether ACE inhibitors and beta blockers should be given prophylactically to patients with DMD to prevent cardiac deterioration; the optimal time to commence therapy is still not agreed upon, although it is agreed that early therapy is clearly superior to late therapy. In patients with mild BMD, or in patients with DMD-related DCM, cardiac transplantation can be offered in severe cases. Without aggressive treatment, DCM can be rapidly progressive after onset in the teenage years, and cause death from cardiac failure within 2 years. It is important to treat any coexisting nocturnal hypoventilation, which aggravates cardiac dysfunction. Around 10% of carriers develop DMD-related cardiac disease, which can occur in the absence of muscle weakness.

Seizures and epileptic syndromes

Seizures are among the numerous problems of many long-case patients. In the last few years, significant advances in the understanding of epilepsy neurogenetics have occurred. Two thirds of all epilepsies are genetic in origin. ‘Idiopathic epilepsy’ is synonymous with having a genetic cause. Ninety-nine per cent of epilepsies are sporadic and have polygenic influences. Only 1 per cent are familial epilepsies due to a single gene, with a substantial effect on epilepsy susceptibility along with genetic and environmental modifiers. These less common monogenic epilepsies have simple Mendelian inheritance, but understanding these should enhance delineating the more complex interactions between genes and the environment that are involved in most epilepsies. Candidates need to be familiar with the concept of epilepsy syndromes, the recognition of which has added precision to diagnostic and management aspects of seizure disorders. The points outlined here may apply to any child with recurrent seizures.

Background information

Definitions: a seizure is a paroxysmal clinical episode that results from an excessive hypersynchronous discharge of neurons; the term epilepsy is used when recurrent unprovoked seizures occur. Recurrent febrile convulsions do not signify epilepsy.

Candidates should be familiar with the classification of epileptic seizures according to seizure type (ILAE, International League Against Epilepsy classification). The ILAE has recently revised terminology and concepts for organisation of the epilepsies. Generalised epileptic seizures are ‘now considered to originate at some point within, and rapidly engage, bilaterally distributed networks’. Focal epileptic seizures are ‘now considered to originate within the networks limited to one hemisphere, which may be discretely localised or more widely distributed’. The term ‘syndrome’ ‘will be restricted to a group of clinical entities that are reliably identified by a cluster of electro-clinical characteristics’. Underlying causes are grouped as genetic, structural/metabolic or unknown. Electroclinical syndromes are defined as ‘a complex of clinical features, signs, and symptoms that together define a distinctive recognisable clinical disorder’.

Currently recognised electroclinical syndromes by age of onset are listed below, using ILAE grouping, reorganised to simplify recall, causes including (if known) the chromosome location, gene, mechanism and salient clinical features. The ones that are asterisked are worth knowing in detail. These are thumbnail summaries, attempting only to give an overview, with some new mnemonics for those obsessed with memorising lists.

Neonatal period

(Mnemonic: OBE)

Infancy

(Mnemonic to Dr West, who described the condition in his son: MB, MB, MD, West)

Migrating partial seizures of infancy: Cause unknown. Clinical: onset average 3 months, multifocal seizures, frequent (almost continuous) seizures, associated psychomotor/developmental regression, quadriplegia, death usually by 12 months.

Benign infantile seizures (Watanabe–Vigevano syndrome): Non-familial and familial forms. Clinically almost identical: onset average 5 months, focal, brief (under 3 minutes), diurnal seizures, in clusters of 5–10 daily (first fit being longer) for 1–3 days, recur in 1–3 months, familial cases have longer fits; altered consciousness, motor arrest, unilateral clonic seizures, automatisms. Familial form, chromosomes: 2q24,16p12–q12, 19q12–13.1.

Myoclonic epilepsy in infancy (MEI): An idiopathic generalised epilepsy. Onset between 6 months and 3 years; myoclonic jerks may be spontaneous or reflex (to photic, auditory, somatosensory stimuli); usually head nodding, upper limbs flinging outward; duration brief (1–2 seconds); consciousness often intact; responds well to AEDs (valproate).

Benign familial neonatal–infantile seizures: Chromosome/gene: 2q23–24/SCN2A. This is a sodium channelopathy, the gene being a sodium channel subunit gene; onset between day 2 and 7 months; focal seizures; can resolve by 12 months.

Myoclonic encephalopathy in non-progressive disorders: Causes: chromosomal disorders (especially Angelman and 4p syndromes), cerebral malformations, ischaemic encephalopathy. Onset average 12 months; pre-existing encephalopathy; repetitive long periods of myoclonic-absence status epilepticus; frequent startle episodes; severe cognitive deficits. AEDs of choice: benzodiazepines, valproate, ethosuximide, ACTH.

Dravet syndrome (severe myoclonic epilepsy in infancy, SMEI): Chromosome/gene: 2q24/SCN1A, 5q34/GABRG2; the former a sodium channel gene, the latter a gamma-aminobutyric acid receptor subunit gamma-2 gene; 70% patients have mutation, 95% de novo. Onset average 6 months; can present in status (hemiclonic, general or febrile); can have hemimotor status (but involve other side next time) plus complex partial (pallor, automatisms, absence), in clusters, often head turn and flexed upper limbs, mainly myoclonic by 4 years. Precipitants: hyperthermia, water [bathing], light, CBZ; frequent fits until 12 months, multiple seizure types between 1 and 4, mainly myoclonic by 4; most have normal development initially, but after 12 months, developmental/neurocognitive regression. Ataxia and pyramidal signs evolve. IQ outcome poor, fits may continue. AEDs used (suggested sequence): first try valproate, then topiramate, then clobazam, then levetiracetam, then stiripentol [chemically unrelated to other AEDs, approved in Europe for Dravet syndrome alone]. Avoid lamotrigine, as can aggravate seizures. Currently (2010) the only epilepsy with a gene test commercially available; test child and parents. Expensive, but stops the need to do other tests (for mitochondrial disorders etc) and affects the parents’ decision to have further children.

West syndrome∗: Epileptic encephalopathy with multiple causes (around 80% symptomatic: cerebral ischaemia [pre-, peri- or postnatal], chromosomal anomalies, cerebral malformations, tuberous sclerosis [TS], infections [congenital or acquired, e.g. TORCH, pertussis, meningitis]; 20% idiopathic). Onset average 5 months, comprises epileptic (infantile) spasms (which are age-dependent reaction to an insult), EEG changes of hypsarrhythmia, and in many, developmental regression. Spasms occur in clusters of up to 30 per day, with each cluster having 20–150 spasms, these being short (2 seconds or less), usually fairly violent, bilateral tonic flexor ‘jack-knife’ or ‘salaam spasms’, on arousal or awake states, and Moro-like extensor spasms. The prognosis is related to the cause. A trial of pyridoxine is worthwhile to exclude pyridoxine dependent seizures if there is a previous history of neonatal or focal seizures. AEDs of choice are ACTH, steroids or vigabatrin. If TS is the cause, then vigabatrin is first line; if non-TS, then ACTH or prednisolone are first line.

Childhood

(Mnemonic: FEEL BALANCE)

Febrile seizures plus (FS+)∗ (can start in infancy): also called GEFS+ (generalised epilepsy with FS+): Chromosomes/genes: 2q24/SCN1A, 2q23–24/SCN2A, 19q/SCN1B, 5q34/GABRG2, 1p36.3/GABRD [Gamma AminoButyricAcid receptor delta gene, codes for subunit of a ligand-gated chloride channel for GABRDelta]. The term describes a family, not a patient. Can be simple febrile seizures, febrile seizures older than 6 years, absences, TLE, myoclonic astatic epilepsy, and SMEI. Phenotype guides treatment and prognosis, not finding mutation.

Early-onset benign childhood occipital epilepsy (Panayiotopoulos type): Onset peak 4–5 years; autonomic symptoms (especially emetic: nausea, retching, vomiting—others include pallor and mydriasis); consciousness and speech preserved at onset; behaviour change (ictal: restlessness, terror); syncope-like unresponsiveness and loss of tone; unilateral eye deviation; autonomic status can occur, may end with hemiconvulsions, or generalised convulsions. Interictal EEG multifocal, high-amplitude, sharp-slow-wave complexes. Prognosis benign:, 25% have one seizure only, 50% have 2–5 only. AEDs rarely needed.

Epilepsy with myoclonic atonic (previously astatic) seizures (EM-AS, also called Doose syndrome): Cause: likely genetically determined in multifactorial polygenic pattern. Onset peak 2–4 years, in 2/3, febrile and afebrile GTCSs occur initially, months before myoclonic–atonic; all patients have symmetrical myoclonic jerks followed immediately by loss of tone (post-myoclonic inhibition); can also have pure atonic or absence, and non-convulsive (myoclonic–atonic) status. Prognosis varies: 50% eventually seizure free, normal development; other 50% usually symptomatic or part of other syndromes, continue to have seizures and neurocognitive deterioration, with ataxia, dysarthria and language problems. AEDs of choice: valproate, lamotrigine, topiramate, levetiracetam. Note contraindicated AEDs: carbamazepine, vigabatrin, phenytoin.

Late-onset childhood occipital epilepsy (Gastaut type): Phenotype of ‘benign childhood seizure susceptibility syndrome’; often family history of epilepsy or migraine. Onset average 8 years; pure occipital seizures, with visual hallucinations (usually small multicoloured circular patterns, compared to ‘fuzzy’ confetti, or sequins), blindness or a combination; short (few seconds to 3 minutes), frequent often diurnal; non-visual features may include deviation of eyes with ipsilateral turning of head, eyelid blinking, eyelid closure; consciousness preserved; interactal EEG shows occipital paroxysms. AED of choice: carbamazepine. Secondary GTCS can occur if not treated.

Benign epilepsy with centrotemporal spikes (BECTS)∗: Also called benign rolandic epilepsy (after region involved; lower part of central gyrus of Rolando). Commonest syndrome; chromosome 11p13; peak age 8–9 years; nocturnal orofaciobrachial focal seizures, short (1–3 minutes), involving the vocal tract, with oropharyngolaryngeal guttural sounds (‘chuggers’ and ‘gluggers’), and hemifacial sensorimotor symptoms that spread to the tongue, mouth and face, causing hypersalivation and speech arrest; consciousness preserved; secondarily GTCSs in 50%. Occur during non-REM sleep, around sleep onset or just before waking, especially 5–7 a.m., in boys more than in girls (3:2). EEG: interictal CTS. Neurodevelopmental disorder, can lead to learning disabilities, behaviour problems. May not need AEDs if seizures infrequent. If frequent or secondary GTCS, AEDs used: carbamazepine, levetiracetam.

Absence, myoclonic—epilepsy with myoclonic absences (MAE): Idiopathic. Onset peak 7 years; seizures comprise rhythmic myoclonic jerks (shoulders, arms, legs), with tonic contraction, usually unilateral; impairment of consciousness, short (8–60 seconds), frequent (several times a day). Around 70% have other seizure types, GTCS or atonic, which may portend a poor prognosis. EEG generalised or multifocal spike and slow wave; around 50% have decreased cognition prior to absences, although 50% of the normal (prior) patients develop cognitive and behavioural impairment as well. Often hard to treat; half the patients have seizures as adults, some develop other forms of epilepsy (e.g. LGS, JME). AEDs tried: valproate plus ethosuximide or lamotrigine, clonazepam, acetazolamide.

Lennox–Gastaut syndrome (LGS)∗: Causes: not genetic; similar to those for West syndrome, but more often cerebral malformations, and less often Aicardi and lissencephaly; can be third part of an encephalopathic continuum (mnemonic OWL); Ohtahara to West to LGS. Onset peak 3–5 years. LGS is an epileptic encephalopathy, with polymorphic intractable seizures (tonic [symmetrical, brief (2–10 seconds)], atypical absences [clouding of consciousness, tone changes, myoclonic jerks], atonic [sudden brief (1–2 seconds) loss of postural tone], EEG slow spike wave discharges); impaired cognition and behaviour. Prognosis very poor: 80–90% have seizures into adult life. AEDs used: valproate (beware hepatic failure, acute haemorrhagic pancreatitis), clonazepam, lamotrigine, levetiracetam, vigabatrin, topiramate.

Absence—childhood absence epilepsy (CAE)∗: Susceptibility conferred by several genes; termed ECA (epilepsy childhood absence). Chromosome/gene: ECA1, 8q24; ECA2, 5q31.1/GABRG2; ECA4, 5q34/GABRA1; ECA5, 15q11–q12/GABRB3; ECA6, 16p13/CACNA1H [calcium channel, voltage dependent, T-type, alpha-1H subunit]. Onset peak 6–7 years, more in girls; very frequent (dozens per day) absences; brief (under 20 seconds); abrupt loss of consciousness; may be automatisms. EEG ictal 3 Hz generalised high-amplitude spike and spike/slow wave. Prognosis excellent: under 10% go on to have GTCSs in adolescence. AEDs of choice: valproate, ethosuximide, lamotrigine. Note contraindicated AEDs: most others; that is, carbamazepine, oxcarbazepine, phenytoin, phenobarbitone—ones with ‘gab/a’ in their name, such as pregabalin, vigabatrin, gabapentin, and tiagabine. Can withdraw AEDs over 6 months after 2–3 years seizure-free.

Nocturnal—autosomal-dominant nocturnal frontal lobe epilepsy (ADNFLE): Chromosome/gene: type 1, 20q13.3/CHRNA4 [cholinergic receptor, neuronal nicotinic, alpha polypeptide 4; gene encoding the alpha 4 nicotinic acetylcholine receptor (nAChR) subunit]; type 2, 15q24; type 3, 1q21/CHRNB2; type 4, 8p21/CHRNA2. Onset average 11 years; frequent (almost nightly) clusters of short (20–50 seconds) hyperkinetic motor seizures with dystonic posturing; may be aura; may be thrown out of bed; consciousness preserved; may be precipitated by movement, sound; often misdiagnosed as obstructive sleep apnoea (OSA), night terrors, nightmares, parasomnia. AEDs of choice: carbamazepine, levetiracetam, clobazam, lamotrigine, topiramate.

CSWS—epileptic encephalopathy with continuous spike-and-wave during sleep (CSWS): Cause unknown, although 50% have pre-existing problem (e.g. cerebral malformations); problem is CSWS causing neurocognitive regression rather than the seizures. Onset of seizures peak 4–5 years, EEG finding of CSWS onset peak 8 years; seizures may be nocturnal unilateral motor seizures, diurnal absences or atonic; regression of IQ, language, behaviour and psychological state; deficits depend on spike localisation. Frontal lobe targeting leads to disinhibition, aggressiveness, inattention, cognitive decline, psychosis (frontal lobe dementia); temporal lobe involvement causes expressive aphasia. Motor problems: ataxia, hemiparesis, dyspraxia. Treatment: spike suppression; similar to approach in LKS treatment (see below). EEG and clinical remission occurs in second decade, including improvement in psychological well being, but not back to normal.

Epileptic encephalopathy, including Landau–Kleffner syndrome (LKS)∗: Also called acquired epileptic aphasia. Cause unknown. Onset peak 5–7 years; normal prior development or isolated language delay; regression in receptive and expressive language abilities, auditory agnosia (cannot identify sounds in environment, e.g. dog barking), global aphasia; seizures tend to be mild, infrequent, nocturnal, resolving by 15 years. EEG: focal/bilateral slow spike wave foci over temporal regions; can be continuous, unilateral or bilateral synchronous; NREM sleep accentuates EEG abnormalities. AEDs used: valproate with lamotrigine, ethosuximide, clonazepam, clobazam, levetiracetam; if unsuccessful, then ACTH or prednisolone; if intractable deterioration, surgical treatment with multiple subplial intracortical transections can succeed. Prognosis: earlier onset imparts worse prognosis.

Adolescence–adult

(Mnemonic: Juvenile TAPE)

Juvenile absence epilepsy (JAE): Susceptibility conferred by several genes; termed EJA (epilepsy juvenile absence). Chromosome/gene: EJA1, 6p12–p11/EFHC1 [EF hand domain (C-terminal)-containing 1; gene product is called myoclonin 1]; EJA2, 3q26/CLCN2 [voltage-gated chloride channel 2]. Onset average 9–13 years; absences similar to CAE, severe, frequent, short (4–30 seconds); GTCS and myoclonic jerks commence up to 10 years after absences start. Ictal EEG: 3–4 Hz generalised polyspike wave discharge; lifelong, but good control in 80% with AEDs valproate and lamotrigine; control of absences generally means control of GTCSs.

Juvenile myoclonic epilepsy (JME)∗: Also called Janz syndrome. Susceptibility conferred by several genes; termed EJM (epilepsy juvenile myoclonus). Chromosome/gene: EJM1, 6p12–p11/EFHC1; EJM2, 15q14/CHRNA7 [alpha 7 subunit of nAChR]; EJM3, 6p21/BR2 [bromodomain-containing protein 2, a nuclear transcriptional regulator]; EJM4, 5q12–q14; EJM5, 5q34–q35/GABRA1 [GABA receptor alpha 1]; EJM6, 2q22–q23/CACNB4 [calcium channel, voltage dependent beta-4 subunit]; EJM7, 1p36.3/GABRD [GABA receptor delta]; EJM8, 3q26/CLCN2 [voltage-gated chloride channel 2]. Onset around 5–16 years for absences, and 14–15 years for myoclonic jerks (typically within an hour of waking; often drop their breakfast cereal bowl), with GTCSs appearing some months after jerks; precipitants include fatigue, sleep deprivation. EEG: 3–6 Hz polyspike wave discharge; probably lifelong treatment needed. It is lifestyle dependent: if take medication but awake all night, will fit; patients with this can drown in the surf. AEDs of choice: valproate, levetiracetam. Note contraindicated AEDs: all the ‘gab/a’ ones (vigabatrin, gabapentin, pregabalin, tiagabine), plus phenytoin, carbamazepine, oxcarbazepine.

Temporal lobe—other familial temporal lobe epilepsies: These include: familial mesial temporal lobe epilepsies (chromosomes: 1q, 4q, 18q); familial occipito-temporal lobe epilepsy (9q); familial partial epilepsy with variable foci (22q12).

Autosomal dominant partial epilepsy with auditory features (ADPEAF): Also called autosomal dominant lateral temporal lobe epilepsy (ADLTLE). Chromosome/gene: 10q24/LGI1 [leucine-rich gene, glioma inactivated]/epitempin. The first non-ion channel familial epilepsy described; onset peak teenage years; mainly simple auditory hallucinations (humming, ringing); also may be visual, olfactory, vertiginous; infrequent nocturnal GTCSs. AEDs: carbamazepine, levetiracetam. Prognosis excellent.

Progressive myoclonus epilepsies (PME): This is a group of rare, genetic disorders (mainly autosomal recessive); details beyond this section. Examples: Unverricht disease (commonest PME); mitochondrial encephalopathy with red ragged fibres (MERRF); all causes have devastating neurocognitive morbidity.

Epilepsy with generalised tonic–clonic seizures alone (EGTCSA)∗: Also called idiopathic generalised epilepsy. Chromosome/gene: 3q26/CLCN2 [voltage gated chloride channel]. Onset peak age 16–17 years; probably lifelong, with 80% relapse if off AEDs. AEDs used: valproate, levetiracetam, lamotrigine, topiramate, phenobarbitone.

SCN1A-related seizure disorders

Of the various channelopathies, candidates should be very aware of the sodium channel alpha 1 subunit gene SCN1A, as mutations in this gene are responsible for a spectrum of seizure disorders, with varying phenotypes, the severity even varying within the same family. There have been over 150 mutations described, around 40% truncation mutations, 40% missense mutations, and the remainder splice site mutations or deletions. These phenotypes are not specific for SCN1A-related seizure disorders, and some features refer to those within the family rather than a particular patient.

Commonly associated phenotypes: febrile seizures (FS), generalised seizures with febrile seizures plus (GEFS+), Dravet syndrome (SMEI), and three that are not in the ILAE list above—severe myoclonic epilepsy, borderline (SMEB), intractable childhood epilepsy with generalised tonic–clonic seizures (ICE–GTC), and infantile partial seizures with variable foci (also called severe infantile multifocal epilepsy).

Less commonly associated phenotypes include myoclonic–astatic epilepsy (Doose syndrome), Lennox–Gastaut syndrome, infantile spasms and vaccine-related encephalopathy and seizures. The latter is important; so-called ‘vaccine encephalopathy’ is not caused by vaccine but, rather, is a genetically determined disease, where the vaccine is merely a trigger: it is no more a cause than light ‘causing’ photosensitive epilepsy, or fever ‘causing’ GEFS+. Unfortunately, because 95% of SCN1A mutations are de novo, there will be a lack of family history of seizures; when this area is fully understood, and alleged cases are appropriately investigated, there will probably be significant societal and medicolegal consequences.

SCN1A mutations have been found in patients with familial hemiplegic migraine (FHM). In 2009, the first report appeared linking familial hemiplegic migraine (FHM) and epilepsy, with a family members with pure FHM having the same SCN1A deletion as family members with seizures; this was the clearest indication yet of the molecular link between migraine and epilepsy.

As can be seen from the ILAE listing above, amongst the idiopathic epilepsies, genetic defects are recognised in the following:

A very important disorder that can cause atypical epilepsy, particularly difficult to treat absences with onset under 4 years, is glucose transporter 1 deficiency syndrome (GLUT1-DS); this is a treatable neurometabolic condition and so must not be missed. Diagnosis is usually achieved by evaluating CSF:serum glucose ratios (samples taken at the same time), although gene testing can be undertaken in research centres. There is typically hypoglycorrhachia (CSF glucose < 2.2 mmol/L) and a CSF:plasma glucose ratio below 0.4.

History

The history of any seizure disorder depends on the description of the event by an eyewitness, with some input from the child, particularly with simple partial seizures. One must remain alert to the differential diagnoses, which are broad but more commonly include syncope (e.g. breath-holding spells), behavioural, parasomnia and postures of spasticity in children with cerebral palsy.

For each type of seizure the child has, the following must be established. The classification of the seizure type (e.g. generalised tonic clonic seizures [GTCS], absence, atonic) is determined from the history, taking into account the points below. Always ask the age of onset for each seizure type.

1. Any prodromal symptoms (e.g. irritability, pallor). The setting in which the events occur (e.g. from sleep, during exercise, when ill, when sleep-deprived). Any precipitating factors (seizure triggers): tiredness, lack of sleep, fever, infectious illness, hot water, having a hot bath, change of dosage or type of anticonvulsant, intake of other substances (in adolescents), falls or blows to the head, movements, sensory stimuli such as flashing lights, television, computer games, patterns (e.g. stripes), elimination of central vision or fixation, sounds, music, startling by sudden noises or touch, reading, calculating, decision-making, playing chess. Reflex seizures are consistently elicited by a particular stimulus. The term ‘catamenial’ refers to seizures that increase in relation to the menstrual cycle, whether perimenstrual, periovulatory or luteal (oestrogens generally are proconvulsant, and progesterones anticonvulsant). Adolescent girls may be asked about this.

2. Any aura (e.g. a specific psychic or sensory symptom, as distinct from a prodromal symptom). This includes running to the parent for comfort. This is applicable to children with partial seizures.

3. Initial cry or scream.

4. Initial localising signs (e.g. twitching of one hand).

5. Description of all the manifestations (motor and autonomic) of the seizure (e.g. eyes ‘rolling back’, altered awareness, cyanosis, jerking movements of limbs, urinary and/or faecal incontinence).

6. The duration of the seizures—the range (e.g. between 5 and 20 minutes) and the ‘usual’ time (e.g. 5 minutes). Any episodes of status epilepticus (duration >30 minutes).

7. The frequency of the seizures—range (e.g. none for 6 weeks to 6 in a day) and the ‘usual’ (e.g. once every 3 weeks).

8. Time of occurrence of seizures (e.g. on waking, or on going to sleep).

9. The date and time of the last seizure.

10. Postictal events (e.g. sleeping, confusion, headache, vomiting, Todd’s paralysis).

11. Presence of neurological dysfunction (other than seizure).

The past history of the seizures—in terms of number of hospital admissions, previous anticonvulsants used and why they were changed, any previous complications of seizures or their treatment, and whether febrile convulsions occurred at a younger age—should be covered thoroughly. The past history of possible aetiological factors (epilepsy risk factors), such as prematurity, cerebral infection, head injury or other neurological insult, should be sought. Note any family history of seizure disorders or other neurological problems in the immediate or extended family (e.g. familial generalised epilepsy with febrile seizures plus (GEFS+).

The details of any anticonvulsant therapy must be known, including the dose, efficacy, when levels were last taken, what they were, recent dosage changes and any current side effects. Common symptoms raised by parents that are often blamed on medication include drowsiness, cognitive slowing and poor behaviour.

Obtain an outline of how the parents manage when the child is having a seizure, what contingency plans exist for a prolonged seizure, their criteria for seeking hospital treatment, any medications given by them acutely at home (e.g. rectal diazepam), how long it takes to get the child to hospital in an emergency and what restrictions are placed on the child because of the seizures (e.g. swimming). Remember to evaluate the parents’ understanding of seizures; for example in terms of prognosis, chances of remission and complications. Are the parents afraid of the child dying? Are there steps of overprotectiveness, including sleeping in the parents’ bed, or excessive social restrictions? An assessment of the child’s schooling progress is important. Compliance with treatment must be discussed.

Finally, remember to take a full social history, including any benefits the child is receiving (e.g. Children’s Disability Allowance), social supports (e.g. Epilepsy Association) and the impact of the disease on the child, schooling, parents and siblings. An enquiry into social isolation or bullying at school can be revealing. If the patient is an adolescent, this involves a whole range of new issues, including compliance, effects on career prospects, driver’s licence, and menstrual and reproductive issues. Mental health issues often come to the fore with the high rates of teenage depression and anxiety seen.

Investigations

The extent of investigation depends on the clinical picture. The following is an incomplete list of some of the more commonly used investigations.

Electroencephalogram (EEG)

An EEG is performed to look for focal slowing or epileptiform activity—that is, spike or sharp wave (localised or generalised). However, epileptiform activity on the EEG does not equate with the diagnosis of epilepsy. An EEG provides collateral information. Interictal epileptiform discharges (IEDs) are found in association with epilepsy. Their yield can be increased by activation methods such as sleep, sleep deprivation, hyperventilation and photic stimulation. Children with epilepsy should have an EEG performed and this may be helpful in making the diagnosis, particularly which type of epilepsy is present (e.g. CAE). However, it should be noted that children with epilepsy may well have normal EEGs (in up to 50% of cases) and, conversely, non-epileptic children may show ‘epileptiform activity’ on their EEGs (3—5% of children).

Certain patterns are well recognised and expected to be known (e.g. BECTS with centrotemporal spikes). Interictal EEG provides valuable information in these epileptic syndromes: BECTS, CAE, JME, LGS, benign occipital epilepsy and partial epilepsies.

Video/EEG monitoring is often reserved for when there are diagnostic issues (Is this epilepsy?) or management issues (What is the epilepsy syndrome?). It may be particularly useful in assessing a child who has a confusing or unconvincing history of ‘funny turns’, or possibly several seizure types. It may aid in assessing conditions such as atonic seizures (e.g. documenting the period of lost muscle tone, and the risk of head injury). Replaying the videotape to the parents may help them to appreciate aspects of their child’s attacks that had not been noted, and allow many questions to be answered, based on what is seen. Video/EEG is indicated in children with medication-resistant epilepsy. It can guide further investigation and management, such as a presurgical evaluation.

Common management issues

The number of potential issues is enormous. This section addresses a small number of selected areas that may be quite relevant in the type of patients seen in the examination.

Increasing frequency of seizures and intractable epilepsy

If the seizures seem to be worsening in duration or frequency, or are changing in nature (such as the appearance of a different type of seizure), the overall management needs to be reconsidered. There are several important areas to question.

Advice to parents (and schoolteachers)

Anticonvulsant medications

Which drug is preferable in which type of seizure?

Table 13.1 is an incomplete list of epilepsy syndromes and useful drugs in each.

Table 13.1 Selected epilepsy syndromes and examples of drugs used

Epilepsy syndromes Drugs
West syndrome/infantile spasms First line: if not caused by tuberous sclerosis: ACTH, prednisolone
  First line: if caused by tuberous sclerosis: VGB
  Second/third line: VGB, VPA, CLZ, TPM
Dravet syndrome (SMEI) VPA, TPM, clobazam, LEV, stiripentol [** avoid CBZ**]
Doose syndrome (MAE) VPA, LTG, TPM, LEV, clobazam, CLZ, ESM, ketogenic diet, steroids (non- convulsive status) [**avoid CBZ and VGB**]
Lennox–Gastaut syndrome VPA, LTG, TPM, CLZ, clobazam, LEV, PHT (childhood epileptic encephalopathy)
Childhood absence epilepsy (CAE) ESM, VPA
BECTS CBZ, VPA, LEV
Landau–Kleffner syndrome (LKS) VPA and LTG, ESM, CLZ, clobazam, LEV, ACTH, prednisolone
Juvenile myoclonic epilepsy (JME) VPA
Symptomatic partial epilepsy CBZ, VPA, LTG, clobazam

ACTH = adrenocorticotropic hormone; BDZs = benzodiazepines; CBZ = carbamazepine; CLZ = clonazepam; ESM = ethosuximide; LEV = levetiracetam; LTG = lamotrigine; PHT = phenytoin; VGB = vigabatrin; VPA = valproate.

Are any of the newer AEDs likely to be of use here?

Of the several newer AEDs introduced over the last decade or so, levetiracetam has emerged one of the most versatile drugs.

Surgical treatment

Surgical treatment of epilepsy is now safe and effective for those with epilepsy that is medically refractory and surgically remediable, with an emphasis towards ‘the sooner the better’ in children. Most adult surgical work has been carried out involving the temporal lobe. In children, extratemporal cases are of similar frequency.

About 1 in 7 patients with epilepsy are refractory to AEDs. Of these, 1 in 4 will be candidates for surgery. The commonest pathologies are focal gliosis, low-grade tumours and focal cortical dysplasia. Less frequent are conditions such as Sturge–Weber syndrome, tuberous sclerosis and hemimegalencephaly. Contraindications include any of the primary generalised epilepsies (PGEs), any neurodegenerative or neurometabolic disorder.

Before surgery is even considered, an adequate trial of AEDs, including the newer AEDs if appropriate, is undertaken. If truly intractable, the localisation of the site of seizure initiation is detected using methods including clinical assessment, video-EEG monitoring, neuropsychology (to assess the functional importance of the site of onset: left-sided function includes verbal IQ and memory, right-sided function includes performance IQ and visual memory), CT, MRI, SPECT, PET, functional MRI and invasive monitoring. Electrical-stimulation mapping can be performed intra- or extraoperatively to identify eloquent cortex in relation to epileptogenic areas.

The Wada test, which comprises anaesthetising each hemisphere to test evaluate memory, may occasionally need to be performed in children over 5. It determines (mnemonic: WADA): Which hemisphere is dominant for language, to see if the other side can maintain memory function, after Amytal sodium injection into internal carotid, Dysfunctional hippocampus identified, and Amnesia avoided as complication. It would only be done if it was unclear which side of the brain contained language function, if there were investigations that were discordant, or if psychological testing suggests significant risk to memory or hippocampal disease is bilateral; the Wada test is not infallible, and a positive test result does not guarantee intact memory postoperatively.

Examples of the types of surgery undertaken are as follows:

Overall mortality from focal resective surgery is very low. A higher mortality rate is seen with hemispherectomy, particularly if under 1 year of age. Morbidities, depending on the site of surgery, include hemiparesis (1–5%), visual field defects (1–5%), language dysfunction (1–3%) and global amnesia (1%).

In well-selected patients, seizure freedom can be seen in up to 80% of tumour cases, and patients with other focal pathologies can be 50–70% seizure-free.

Some centres offer vagal nerve stimulation (VNS) to those intractable patients who are not candidates for surgery. The VNS device is a battery-powered electrical pulse generator (batteries last three years) implanted under the skin in the left chest, attached to electrodes that are wrapped around the main trunk of the left vagus nerve. The device is programmed, via a computer and a hand-held ‘wand’, to stimulate the vagus at various frequencies (usually for 30 seconds each 5 minutes). Exposure to powerful magnets (e.g. MRI, hair trimmers, loudspeakers) can interfere with the stimulator or electrode leads. There should be similar precautions to those with cardiac pacemakers.

Management of the prolonged seizure

In ambulance/at hospital

Having checked that the airway is secured, giving high flow oxygen, checking breathing and circulation, and checking the blood glucose, if the seizure has already gone on for longer than 5 minutes, an intravenous loading dose of phenobarbitone or phenytoin would be an appropriate next step. Once the infusion of either of these drugs is complete, if the seizure continues, then that medication has failed, and the next step in the treatment algorithm should be followed. There are many versions of an ‘ideal approach’; candidates should be conversant with that used at their teaching hospital.

A suggested ‘ideal’ time course for treating a seizure at presentation (assuming immediate vascular access achieved) is as follows:

The underlying cause for the prolonged seizure must be thoroughly investigated. Investigations may include CT or MRI scanning, with or without lumbar puncture. A common end point for a resistant prolonged seizure is for the child to be anaesthetised, while investigations continue, and treated (antibiotics, acyclovir, dexamethasone, plus continued anticonvulsants) to cover serious underlying pathology.

Spina bifida

It is well recognised that neural tube development is disrupted by maternal folate deficiency. It is estimated that 85% of all cases of neural tube defects are preventable by maternal folate supplementation. Since 2006, there has been an annual worldwide decrease of some 6600 folic acid preventable spina bifida and anencephaly cases, attributable to the current worldwide programmes of folic acid fortification of wheat and maize flour. This can be further improved by more countries requiring fortification of both wheat and maize flour and setting fortification levels high enough to increase a woman’s daily average requirement of folic acid to 400 mcg. Not only does folate reduce the incidence substantially, but folate supplementation decreases the severity of neural tube defects should they still occur.

In September 2009, mandatory folic acid fortification was introduced into Australia, requiring Australian millers to add folic acid to wheat flour for bread-making purposes. Current recommendations include folic acid supplementation 1 month before conception and through at least the first 8–12 weeks of pregnancy. All women contemplating pregnancy should ingest a daily multivitamin containing 0.5 mg folic acid. If there is a family history of neural tube defect, one needs to advise that 5 mg is taken. It has been suggested that NTDs are not due to folate deficiency per se, but due to enzymatic abnormalities involving metabolic processes that depend on folate and its metabolites, tetrahydrofolate and 5-methyltetrahydrofolate, abnormalities that could be overcome with folate supplementation.

Neural tube closure is believed to occur in five separate sites within the first 28 days of gestation: NTDs result from failure of closure at one site or failure of two sites to meet, between day 17 and day 28, when the mother may not be aware she is pregnant. Each site may be controlled by separate genes and influenced by differing external factors. Known environmental influences implicated in the development of NTDs include high first-trimester blood sugar levels (diabetic mother), elevated maternal temperature (from fevers or saunas) and AEDs, particularly sodium valproate and carbamazepine.

Advances in prenatal diagnosis allow diagnosis of myelomeningocoele (MMC) as early as the first trimester. In specialised centres in the USA, in-utero repair of fetal MMC (fMMC) has been performed at 19–25 weeks; this can theoretically reverse hindbrain herniation, decrease the need for postnatal ventriculo-peritoneal shunting due to hydrocephalus, and prevent late loss of function due to tethering. By 2009, over 400 fMMC repairs had been performed worldwide. At the time of writing, a multicentre randomised prospective trial of 200 patients (100 fetal repair versus 100 postnatal repair), the MOMS (Management Of Myelomeningocele Study) still was ongoing; the results should answer the question of whether prenatal or postnatal closure is preferable. A retrospective chart review of results of 54 children (44 had lumbar lesions, 6 sacral, 4 thoracic) who had fMMC closure, at a follow-up age of 66 months, showed that 69% walked independently, 24% were assisted walkers and 7% were wheelchair dependent. Higher-level lesions and the development of club foot after fetal intervention made independent walking less likely. Most independent walkers, and all assisted walkers, still had significant problems with lower limb coordination.

A child with spina bifida provides a good example of an examination case with an enormous number of potential problems and management issues. In order to organise your assessment of the child, it is useful to structure history-taking and management issues as follows:

History

Current history

Management

Entire books have been written on almost every aspect of spina bifida. This section gives a skeleton outline of the more common and important issues raised. Every child with spina bifida has a unique set of problems, the emphasis of each case being more individualised than the major texts would suggest. The problems tend to be more ‘medical’ in younger children, and more ‘psychosocial’ in older children and adolescents.

Major disabilities

Paralysis

Associated problems include immobility, dependence versus independence, joint contractures, anaesthetic skin risks and pressure necrosis of soft tissues. Barriers to mobility include the level of the lesion, associated spasticity, poor balance, the Arnold–Chiari II malformation and orthopaedic deformities (including scoliosis, oblique pelvis, hip flexion), as well as behavioural problems and some degree of cognitive impairment.

Management involves a team approach:

Bladder and renal function

Bladder management depends on the type of dysfunction (e.g. dribbling urine; dribbling with increased abdominal pressure, such as during crying or movement; urinary retention). Investigations may clarify this. On occasion, particularly in adolescents, a worsening of bladder control may be the first indication of a problem such as tethered cord, syringomyelia or a failing shunt.

Anticholinergic agents (e.g. oral oxybutynin) may increase bladder storage capacity, and alpha-adrenergic drugs may increase bladder outlet resistance. The combination of these, plus intermittent catheterisation, can prevent residual urine retention and increase continence. Self-catheterisation is encouraged when the child is old enough. Many units’ management involves starting all babies on intermittent catheterisation as soon as possible, usually within the first 2 weeks of life. Indicators of high-pressure systems include urinary tract infection, hydronephrosis, vesicoureteric reflux and incomplete emptying; these all mean that intermittent catheterisation should be initiated—if it has not been as yet. Parents are trained in catheterisation, using an appropriately sized catheter with lubricant, starting at a frequency of 3–4 times daily. Generally, a French sized 8 catheter is used until the age of 8 years, then size 10 until 10 years, then size 12 until 12 years, then size 14 after that. Other forms of management include BTX-A injection into the detrusor muscle, and intravesical oxybutynin.

Those children who cannot store any urine can be managed by incontinence clothing (pads and pants). Boys can use a penile appliance from about 8 years of age. An artificial sphincter may be considered in this group, although this is very rarely done now because of high complication rates.

If catheterisation is at all difficult, then a Mitrofanoff procedure can be done (the appendix, used as a conduit to the abdominal wall, is fashioned and catheterisation is performed via this stoma). This is useful as children get older and need to be more independent, especially for those with tight adductors or fine motor difficulties who cannot catheterise themselves.

Urinary tract infections (UTIs) need a full course of antibiotics for the acute infection. However, a positive urine culture in the absence of significant symptoms probably reflects urinary tract colonisation rather than infection per se. It is prudent to only treat for a UTI with antibiotics if the child is unwell; otherwise, antibiotic resistance would increase. Only give prophylactic antibiotics in the neonatal period when there is hydronephrosis or vesico-ureteric reflux (VUR). Urine specimens (MSUs) should be obtained to check for infection, when parents suspect (urine odour, child unwell). Surgery may be required for several urinary problems: augmentation cystoplasty if the bladder is small and hypertonic, bladder neck reconstruction or artificial external urinary sphincter. Surgery for VUR may be needed if recurrent urinary tract infections occur despite treatment, and if there is renal scarring or persistent hydronephrosis. Urolithiasis can occur secondary to immobilisation.

Renal review by nephrologist or urologist, with ultrasound or renal scan, and nuclear or radiographic cystogram, are required yearly.

Chronic kidney disease (CKD) can occur in about 5–10% of patients, and the medical management is along standard lines, including peritoneal dialysis and renal transplantation (RTx). It should be noted that, in peritoneal dialysis, an indwelling catheter in the peritoneal cavity with an elevated risk of peritonitis is a consideration in patients with ventriculoperitoneal shunts who are prone to develop shunt infections. An ileal conduit is usually required for transplant as the neurogenic bladder is the cause of the renal failure.

CKD-mineral bone disorder (renal osteodystrophy) in this population is of interest: children with spina bifida are at increased risk of fracturing their paraplegic lower limbs, even with normal renal function, so that with renal impairment, bone mineralisation is compromised further by metabolic acidosis, secondary hyperparathyroidism and impaired hydroxylation of vitamin D. This can be treated with dietary restriction of phosphate, administration of phosphate binders, and 1-OH-vitamin D. The correction of metabolic acidosis is particularly important, as spina bifida patients may have urinary conduits, bladder augmentation or urinary reservoirs, each of which can cause hyperchloraemic acidosis requiring alkali therapy. For more details on CKD, dialysis and RTx, see Chapter 12 (Nephrology).

Hydrocephalus

This is seen in 90% of all children with spina bifida, and is treated with a ventricular shunt. The caudal hindbrain anomaly of the Arnold–Chiari II malformation is present in almost all patients. Associated problems include an increased chance of intellectual impairment, and shunt complications such as infection, obstruction (underdrainage), low-pressure syndrome (overdrainage) or seizures. An average of two shunt changes are needed in the first 10 years. Management includes appropriate schooling for intellectual impairment, and education regarding complications of shunts and their presentation.

Underdrainage can be due to blockage of the shunt tubing, the shunt breaking or parts becoming disconnected. Classic presentation includes headache (worse on waking, before rising in the morning), nausea, vomiting, dizziness, listlessness, lethargy, poor feeding, insidious deterioration in behaviour (e.g. irritable or disruptive) or intellectual functioning (worsening school performance), and onset of, or worsening of, fitting. In addition, shunt malfunction can present as a change in motor performance (e.g. decreased muscle strength, loss of previously acquired motor skills, increase in spasticity in upper or lower limbs), alteration in gait, change in bladder or bowel habit, change in lower cranial nerve function, back pain, worsening scoliosis and worsening of lower limb orthopaedic deformities. Very rarely, the sole indicator of shunt malfunction is papilloedema, so it is worth checking the fundi every time a doctor is seen.

Overdrainage has a somewhat similar presentation: headache (worsened by getting up from lying down), dizziness and fainting. If rapid, a subdural haemorrhage can result, with symptoms varying from headache to those of a stroke. If gradual, ‘slit ventricle’ syndrome can occur, and can cause high pressure to reappear, but with small ventricles on scanning). Various symptoms in a patient with a shunt may be attributed to the shunt unless a definite alternative diagnosis is apparent.

Infection of shunts is almost always due to bacteria getting into the cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) or shunt at the time of operation; hence it is most common within first 3 days of shunt placement. On occasion, infection can present as shunt blockage within weeks or months of operation. An infected shunt must be removed and replaced with a new clean shunt. Progress is being made in developing shunts that are resistant to bacterial infection.

In any child with a shunt, if there is any deterioration in neurological, orthopaedic or urological function, it should be assumed to be due to shunt dysfunction until proved otherwise. Generally, a cranial CT scan is performed in the first instance to exclude blockage.

Other useful investigations with shunt problems may include cerebrospinal fluid analysis, plain X-rays (head, chest, abdomen) to demonstrate shunt position and to check for disconnection, cranial CT or MRI scans, and radioisotope studies (e.g. computerised clearance study for clearance over 24 hours, or direct injection of isotope into the shunt to check shunt patency).

The Arnold–Chiari II malformation, syringomyelia and scoliosis

The Arnold–Chiari II malformation comprises downward displacement of the cerebellar tonsils and vermis through the foramen magnum, elongation and kinking of the medulla, caudal displacement of the cervical spinal cord and medulla, and obliteration of the cisterna magna. Descent of the hindbrain through the foramen magnum can cause compression of the brainstem and lead to dysfunction of the cerebellum, medullary respiratory centre and cranial nerves IX and X, and to hydrocephalus. It also incorporates other brain malformations (e.g. callosal dysgenesis, abnormalities of neuronal migration and brain sulcation) that may be associated with learning disabilities experienced by some children with spina bifida. It causes symptoms sufficient to require surgical treatment in about 15–35% of patients.

Symptoms can include: swallowing difficulties (due to lower cranial nerve or brainstem dysfunction), choking on foods (especially liquids), nasal regurgitation or gastro-oesophageal reflux when drinking or vomiting, repeated aspiration pneumonia episodes, dysarthria, obstructive sleep apnoea, cyanosis, stridor (inspiratory), hoarse or high-pitched cry, weakness or spasticity of upper limbs, neck pain, headache, scoliosis, dizziness, clumsiness or poor coordination (the last three being cerebellar symptoms).

Surgical treatment involves decompression of the medulla and upper cervical cord, then insertion of a dural patch graft (duraplasty) to increase the size of the dural sac. Cervical laminectomy is performed below the lowest level of the cerebellar tonsils. In response to surgical decompression, brainstem abnormalities improve in 50%, and upper limb weakness, cerebellar function and pain improve in 80% of cases.

Syringomyelia can develop secondary to the Chiari malformation, causing abnormal cerebrospinal fluid dynamics. Apart from the bulbar symptoms, many of the problems described above can be attributed to syringomyelia. Syrinxes can be of varying sizes and range along the spinal cord. They can reach holocord dimensions, meaning that they have just a thin rim of spinal cord around the fluid-filled syrinx. Syringomyelia is significantly associated with scoliosis, and lower limb weakness and deformities. MRI can show the size and range of syrinxes. The size of the syrinx does not seem to correlate with the degree of associated scoliosis; it seems that the presence of syringomyelia is sufficient to cause scoliosis. Syrinxes can be seen on MRI in around 80% of patients with MMC, but are symptomatic in only 2–5%. Usual presenting features are upper limb weakness, back pain, scoliosis and spasticity or motor loss in the lower limbs. Extension of syringomyelia can affect lower cranial nerves and brainstem function. Symptoms from syringomyelia can be due to associated hydrocephalus or shunt malfunction, and resolve when this underlying cause is corrected. The posterior decompression of the foramen magnum and upper cervical spine to decompress the Chiari malformation often reduces the size of the syringomyelia. A shunt from syrinx to peritoneal cavity can relieve the problem.

Scoliosis in spina bifida patients can be caused by congenital malformations of the spine, but more often scoliosis is acquired due to intraspinal abnormalities, such as syringomyelia, tethered cord or shunt failure. When hydrocephalus with syringomyelia is drained, there are improvements in scoliosis if the Cobb angle is small (measuring less than 30°). Bracing does not work and could lead to more pressure sores. Larger curves require formal scoliosis procedures. Associated problems of scoliosis can include: impairment of balance (changed centre of gravity); decreased total lung capacity, with an increased risk of infection and cor pulmonale; impairment of height; need for surgery (e.g. Harrington rods) and consequent prolonged hospitalisation. The surgical goals are stopping the progressive development of curving, and correcting pelvic obliquity, for improved sitting and fewer pressure sores. Spinal fusions are often left short of the pelvis, as fusing the spine to the pelvis has led to some ambulatory patients losing their ability to walk, as they can no longer maintain balance.

Many units have found that when patients with subtle signs of neurological deterioration are closely followed, aggressively investigated, and dealt with by revising shunts for hydrocephalus or decompressing the Chiari malformation, then there is a marked decrease in patients who have scoliosis in their clinics at follow-up.

Other significant disabilities (the six Ss)

Other problems

Social issues

These can be the most important issues, particularly in older children. Problems include low self-esteem, ongoing dependence on parents, leading to living at home indefinitely, seeking partners who will ‘care’ for them (parent substitute), unrealistic expectations about marriage and employment prospects. One way to boost self-esteem is to encourage children to participate in decision-making (e.g. type of crutches, what kind of bracing, colour of wheelchair), and to include them in discussions about incontinence care and surgical interventions, if old enough. In terms of helping them to become more self-sufficient in society, their attention should be focused on the long-term picture, so that realistic educational and employment goals can be set.

Adolescence brings its own set of stresses. In these children, areas of concern include appearance and presentability. Problems such as pressure sores, obesity, leaking of urine and progression of scoliosis become paramount. Other problems include denial of disability, difficulty establishing identity, independence, friendships with the opposite sex and appropriate sexual functioning.

When patients reach adulthood, the attendance rate at multidisciplinary clinics drops by around 50%, lack of motivation being but one possible cause. Secondary effects may include neglect of skin care or of adequate catheterisation techniques. Apathy due to having the disorder per se, as well as secondary depression, are not uncommon in adults, and the use of antidepressants may be warranted. Suicidal ideation is not uncommon, and anxiety issues often arise. The local doctor is usually best placed to assess for these sorts of problems.

Short Cases

Developmental assessment

Entire books have been written describing the approach to evaluating a child’s development. This section is not meant to be a detailed description, but merely a guide to the general areas that should be covered, and a suggested overall plan.

All candidates will be familiar with at least one type of developmental assessment system, and should continue using one with which they are comfortable (e.g. the Denver Developmental Screening Test).

Candidates often fear the lead-in, ‘Would you please perform a developmental assessment’, simply because there is an associated mythology of difficulty, which is unwarranted. Once you know the first 18 months of development ‘backwards’, including the times of appearance and incorporation of all the primitive reflexes, then you should be fairly well equipped to interpret your findings, as this tends to be the age range that is more popular as an examination subject.

The problem with this case is not one of interpretation but of inappropriate actions, such as distracting an infant with a noise-making stimulus when testing vision, or not undressing the patient when assessing gross-motor milestones. This section addresses those issues.

Begin by introducing yourself to the parent and patient. Inspect for the following:

The next step depends on the age of the child. A child small enough to be comfortably sat on his or her mother’s knee should be positioned there for assessment of vision, hearing, language, personal–social interaction and fine-motor control.

It is unwise to remove a child from his or her mother to perform a gross-motor assessment first. Often, candidates seem too keen to do exactly that. It does not help rapport with the child, mother or examiner. If a child is older, then he or she may prefer to be examined sitting on a chair.

Always test vision before hearing. Fixing and following, and an approximation of visual acuity (e.g. the ability to pick up a ‘hundred and thousand’ for infants, or the ability to read in older children), are important. Testing of visual fields is not required. Testing each eye separately is desirable, but can be difficult to achieve without upsetting an infant.

Testing hearing, with the infant on the mother’s lap, requires initial distraction with a non-noisemaking (i.e. purely visual) stimulus, directly in front of the child. This is then hidden, at which time the noise-maker (e.g. bell) is brought towards the ear from behind (out of range of visual fields) by an assistant (e.g. the chief examiner). On a signal given by yourself, the assistant makes a sound (e.g. rings the bell) at a certain distance from the ear (this varies for different ages), testing each ear in turn and noting whether the child’s facial expression, or activity (in babies), changes, and if the head turns towards the stimulus, localising the sound (in older children). If the conditions are not optimal for testing hearing (e.g. fractious toddler), say so. If there is an equivocal result, it is reasonable to suggest a formal audiological assessment.

The fine-motor assessment can then be performed. If the child is severely visually impaired, this makes assessment very difficult, and explains the logic of always testing vision first. Ensure that you have appropriate objects in your case to test fine-motor functions, such as ‘hundreds and thousands’, raisins (testing pincer grip), 2.5 cm blocks (for stacking), different-sized beads and threads (threading a bead is a good test of coordination), a biro with a top (putting the top on a biro is another good test of coordination and fine-motor development), and a plastic knife, fork and spoon set.

Throughout the testing described above, assessment of personal–social interaction and language can be performed. Do not forget to comment on any vocalising the child does, or on interactions with you (e.g. smiling, waving, laughing), as these may give very valuable information, which can be overlooked if it is not actively considered as part of a developmental assessment.

Finally, perform a gross-motor assessment. In an infant, or severely impaired patient, this comprises the ‘180° examination’, and in an older child, a gait examination.

The ‘180° examination’ aptly describes the sequence of manoeuvres examined, as follows. Note that the gross-motor assessment should be performed on a firm surface, so if the examining couch is not firm, a sheet or blanket can be spread on the floor (the examiners must be aware that you realise the need for a firm surface).

First, with the child lying supine, note the posture (e.g. adopting abnormal asymmetric tonic neck reflex [ATNR] positioning) and movement (e.g. choreoathetoid movements with cerebral palsy [CP], paucity of movement with some neuromuscular diseases).

Next, draw the child into the sitting position, by traction on the arms, noting the degree of head control/lag (e.g. marked head lag with spinal muscular atrophy).

With the child in the sitting position, note the amount of head and trunk control, and ability to sit, supported and unsupported.

Next, hold the child up to check weight-bearing. This helps detect lower limb scissoring (as in CP), lower limb hypotonia and weakness (e.g. neuromuscular disorders causing the ‘floppy infant’ syndrome), and inappropriately ‘advanced’ weight bearing (in CP).

Then, hold the child in ventral suspension and describe the posture of the head, trunk and limbs. This position can demonstrate hypotonia well: if very severe, the infant describes a ‘C’ shape over the examiner’s hand. The converse can occur with CP, where an exaggerated extensor posture may be adopted.

Finally, lay the child prone. Make sure that the hands are placed to either side of the infant’s shoulders, with the palms apposed to the bed and elbows flexed, to optimise the ability to extend the upper limbs. Note the ability of the child to raise the head and trunk when placed prone.

The primitive reflexes may be checked separately after the 180° examination, or may be incorporated into the sequence (e.g. assessing the sucking, rooting, ATNR and neck-righting reflexes when supine, the grasp reflex when pulling the child to sit, the placing and stepping reflexes when held standing to check weight bearing, the Landau and Galant reflexes when held in ventral suspension), depending on personal preference. Whichever is chosen, leave the Moro and parachute reflexes until last, as they may upset the child.

If you are checking the primitive reflexes separately, the following is a suggested order, with the usual times of appearance and incorporation, or disappearance, of the reflexes. The elicitation of the lesser-known reflexes is detailed:

1. Sucking and rooting (birth to 4 months, when awake, and to 6 months when sleeping).

2. Palmar grasp (birth to 3 months).

3. Placing, stepping (both from birth to 6 weeks).

4. Landau reflex, a two-stage reflex. With the child supported prone (with your hand under the abdomen), the child should (normally) extend head, trunk and hips. This is the first, and more important, stage. Next, flex the head and neck; normally the response is flexion of trunk and hips, but this is less constant than the first stage (first stage from 4 months, plus second stage from 9 months; gone by 2 years).

5. ATNR. With the child supine, the head is rotated to one side. A ‘fencing’ posture develops, with extension of the ipsilateral upper and lower limb (i.e. the side towards which the head is turned) and flexion of the opposite side (2–6 months). Persistence beyond 6 months is indicative of upper motor neurone problems, especially CP. Maintaining the ATNR posture throughout the time that the head is held turned, such that the child cannot ‘break’ from that position, is similarly significant.

6. Neck-righting reflex. Rotation of the trunk to conform with the position of the head when the head is rotated to one side (6 months to 2 years).

7. Moro reflex (birth to 4 months). As with most primitive reflexes, persistence beyond the usual time of disappearance is pathological. Make a point of focusing not only on the limb movements but also the facial response, for asymmetry (e.g. in hemiplegic CP).

8. Parachute reflex. With the infant held in the prone position, move him or her rapidly, face downwards, towards the floor. The normal reaction is to extend both upper limbs as if to break the fall (appears between 6 and 12 months, usually at 9 months, and persists; its absence beyond 12 months is abnormal). Asymmetry occurs with hemiplegia.

As the examination is proceeding, it is useful to comment on each finding as it is elicited, making sure that the examiners see that you know the significance of each sign found. Terms such as ‘age-appropriate’ may be useful when normal findings occur.

A succinct summary at the completion of the examination should attempt to give a developmental age to each of the areas assessed, and state whether any delay detected is global, or whether there is a scatter of abilities (e.g. gross- and fine-motor delay only in Werdnig–Hoffmann disease, visual and gross-motor impairment in an ex-premature baby, global delay in a child with congenital rubella or severe CP).

Eye examination

This is not an infrequent case. The number of possible pathologies is clearly enormous, but the candidate should be able to perform a comprehensive eye examination as outlined, and should be familiar with important paediatric eye conditions that can appear in examinations; a selected few are outlined below.

Background information: some important eye conditions

Retina

Retinopathy of prematurity (ROP)

This can only occur before the retina is vascularised. As the peripheral retina is the region that is vascularised last in the eye of the baby, it is the most commonly involved area. ROP affects around 80% of babies under 1 kg and almost 10% of these will have their vision threatened. Among those between 1 and 1.5 kg, 50% are affected with ROP, and 2% of these will have their vision threatened. The stage, location and extent of ROP are the standard three aspects that determine management.

There are five stages of ROP:

‘Plus’ is added to each stage if there are dilated and tortuous vessels in the posterior retina. This indicates a worse prognosis and more progressive disease.

Three zones are described:

The extent is described relative to the circumferential distribution, in clock hours, with the entire eye comprising 12 clock hours, divided into single clock hours of 30°.

If the disease is stage 3 in 5–8 adjacent clock hours with plus disease in Zone II, treatment with cryotherapy is warranted; this is the threshold level. The small (less than 1000 g) sick baby who goes from crisis to crisis is at greatest risk.

Procedure

The paediatric eye examination is best done with the child sitting on the side of the bed, in a chair or on the parent’s lap, depending on the child’s age. After introducing yourself, stand back and look at the overall appearance of the child, particularly for dysmorphic features (various malformation syndromes have eye involvement), facial features of the ‘ex-premmie’ (associated ROP) and growth parameters (e.g. may be small and microcephalic, with intrauterine infection). Also note any head tilt (e.g. with fourth cranial nerve palsy). After brief comments on general appearance, direct your attention to the eyes.

Irrespective of the child’s age, eye examination is always started by inspection for external abnormalities. Commence by looking from in front, from the side and from above to detect any proptosis. Next, focus successively on each of the anatomical structures of the eye to detect any abnormalities (i.e. look at the eyebrows, eyelids, cornea, iris, sclera and conjunctivae). This systematic approach should prevent important signs being overlooked. If the child wears glasses, examine these also.

After inspection, proceed with testing of visual acuity in each eye. Response to a face is the best way of trying to assess whether or not an infant can see. Note whether the infant can fix and follow by moving your face in front of him or her. After a face, the next best target is a large bright object (e.g. red ball of wool). See if the child is fixing and following. If he or she can see a large object, then proceed to test with smaller objects down to the pinhead size of a ‘hundred and thousand’ cake decoration. If there is no response to your face, use a torch to check response to a bright light. In older children, Sheridan Gardner Test Charts (preschool age) or the Snellen Test Charts (school age) can be used. If these tests suggest a problem with acuity, then comment on the need for formal testing.

Testing of the visual fields can then be performed. Again, the technique is age dependent. In infants, use a red ball of wool brought from behind the child’s head: head turning indicates when it enters the visual field. In older children, a direct confrontation can be used, first with both eyes and then with each eye separately. The classic ‘red hat pin’ technique can be used with adolescents.

Extraocular movements can then be tested (see the short case on motor cranial nerves in this chapter). It is probably easier to hold the child’s head still with one hand, and have the child follow an interesting target (e.g. a small bright puppet) held by the other hand, than to keep asking the child to stop moving the head. Both eyes can be tested together, and the child should be asked, at each position of gaze, to indicate any diplopia: ‘Say how many you see’ or ‘Say if you see two’.

The evaluation of eye movements in the newborn infant can be difficult. One way to overcome this is to pick the baby up and move him or her in various directions, watching the eye movements produced because of the vestibular ocular reflex (when the child is rotated, eyes move in the opposite direction, and nystagmus occurs; when rotation is ceased, after-nystagmus occurs). Thus moving the child up and down, side to side, and backwards and forwards will permit evaluation of the main directions of eye movement.

At this stage, in older children, depending on the clinical findings so far, it may be appropriate to check for lid lag (if there is a suggestion of thyrotoxicosis) and fatiguability on upward gaze (to screen for myasthenia gravis, particularly if there is bilateral ptosis or myopathic facies).

Near and far cover tests should be performed, with an interesting toy as the fixation target. If the child becomes upset when one eye is covered, this suggests poor vision in the uncovered eye (although this should have been detected when assessing visual acuity). Also, shine a torch into the eyes from a distance to detect a squint (although this will not detect microstrabismus).

Testing the pupillary light reflexes and fundoscopy are usually best left until the end, because of the cooperation required and time constraints. When assessing the pupils, note whether they are of normal size (or have been dilated for the examination) and if there is any asymmetry in size, and then check the light reflex (with a pen-torch; remember to place a hand between the eyes as a barrier to prevent any light reaching the opposite side to the one being tested; also watch for the Marcus Gunn phenomenon). Check the accommodation reflex.

Ophthalmoscopy is then performed. First, look for the red reflex. Then the anterior aspects of the eye should be examined, the cornea, the lens and finally retinoscopy. Remember that one of the ‘golden eye rules’ is ‘never give an opinion through an undilated pupil’. However, the examiners may expect an opinion (the pupils may already be dilated; if not, it may be appropriate to comment that dilating the pupils would be helpful).

Finally, for completeness, offer to test the corneal reflex (do not just go ahead and do it, as children tend to find this very distressing), palpate for evidence of raised intraocular pressure (glaucoma) and then auscultate over each closed eyelid with the bell of the stethoscope (with the child holding his or her breath while you auscultate, if possible) for bruits.

At the completion of the examination, the examiners may ask whether there is anything else you would like to assess. This will depend on the most obvious finding, as in the following examples:

Stages of visual development (in relation to clinically applicable testing)

Between 1 and 2 years, the allure of rolling balls has diminished, and it is difficult to hold the child’s attention, but if this is possible, the rolling and mounted ball tests remain useful. From 2 years, miniature toy-matching tests can be used. Remember that by the age of 2 years, acuity should be 6/6. For preschool children (31⁄2 to 51⁄2 years old), the Sheridan–Gardner test or the E test can be used. The former is a better test, as children are less likely to become confused because laterality is not involved. For school-aged children, the Snellen Test Charts can be used, or the E test if the child cannot recognise the Snellen Chart letters.

Motor cranial nerves

This is one of the most common neurological examinations requested. The introductions are variable (e.g. ‘This child has had droopy eyelids since birth’, or ‘This boy has had facial weakness for several years’), but the specific instruction of ‘Examine the motor cranial nerves’ usually accompanies this type of lead-in. A smoothly performed motor cranial nerve examination can be comfortably achieved within 5 minutes. This is quite different from ‘Cranial nerves’, as the additional examination components of the vision, eyes, hearing and other sensory modalities are quite time-consuming.

A suggested approach follows for children of preschool age or older. For younger children, improvisation involving the use of interesting-looking toys and play is necessary.

First, introduce yourself to the patient and parent. Shake hands with both (although this is not a reliable test to detect myotonic dystrophy, it is worth doing, as it is polite, and as myotonic dystrophy can be a differential diagnosis for motor cranial nerve pathology; if myotonic dystrophy is suspected, get the patient/parent to make a fist and then fully open the hand, spreading the fingers, as quickly as possible). Inspect the face carefully and scan the limbs, for any obvious signs such as ptosis, facial asymmetry or hemiplegic posturing.

Before checking the extraocular eye movements, the visual acuity needs to be quickly checked, to confirm that the child can see to follow an object (e.g. a finger puppet). Explain what you are doing as you proceed.

To test the extraocular movements, ask the child to follow your finger or other small object. Ask the child how many fingers (or objects) can be seen, in each of nine positions (right and left lateral gaze, up and down in central, right and left lateral positions, and straight ahead, i.e. central).

The findings sought include lack of movement, diplopia and nystagmus. If abnormalities are demonstrated, then each eye should be tested separately.

Third nerve lesions cause ptosis, a ‘down and out’ position of the involved eye, and paralysis of most eye movements, sparing only lateral rectus and superior oblique function. They also cause a dilated pupil and lack of direct and consensual pupillary light response, but pupil light reactions do not need to be tested in a motor examination. Fourth nerve lesions cause diplopia on looking down and in. Sixth nerve lesions cause lack of lateral movement, with diplopia most marked on looking towards the affected side.

Next, examine the fifth nerve. You may ask the child the following, demonstrating each move as you proceed. ‘Open your mouth’: the jaw will deviate towards the weak side with a unilateral fifth nerve lesion, pushed by the normal pterygoid. ‘Now keep it open; don’t let me close it’: this tests the pterygoids. ‘Clench your teeth tight’: feel the muscle bulk on each side. Then with your hand against the lateral aspect of the chin, ‘Move your chin towards my hand’, on each side. This tests each pterygoid in turn. Finally check the jaw jerk: ‘Open your mouth a little; I’m just going to tap on your chin’. The jerk will be increased in pseudobulbar palsy.

The muscles of facial expression are then tested. ‘Look up and raise your eyebrows’: this tests the frontalis and is particularly useful in differentiating upper motor neurone lesions (upper facial muscles are preserved due to bilateral innervation) from lower motor neurone lesions, where the upper facial muscles are affected. ‘Screw your eyes up tight’: compare the two sides, noting any asymmetry between the degree the eyelashes are buried on either side. This may detect an obvious Bell’s phenomenon, where there is rolling upward of the eyeball when attempting to shut the eyes forcefully, as eye closure may not be possible in lower motor neuron lesions. Then try to open each eye: ‘Keep them shut; stop me opening them’. This tests the orbicularis oculi muscles. ‘Now show me your teeth’ allows assessment of any asymmetry of the nasolabial grooves. The mouth will be drawn towards the normal side if there is a unilateral lesion of either upper or lower motor neuron type. ‘Puff out your cheeks; keep them like that’: demonstrate this and then tap with your finger over each cheek to detect ease of air expulsion on the affected side.

The ninth, tenth and twelfth nerves are then tested. ‘Open your mouth wide’: look (with a torch) at the uvula for any deviation to either side. ‘Now say aaah’: watch movement of the soft palate. With unilateral lesions of the tenth nerve the uvula is drawn towards the normal side. Inspect the tongue for fasciculations (tongue not protruding). Then say ‘Poke out your tongue’ and note any deviation. With a unilateral lesion, the normal side pushes the tongue towards the affected (weaker) side. Also check that the tongue can be equally well protruded towards each side. (For some reason, children love poking their tongues out at nervous examination candidates.) Get the child to speak (e.g. ‘Which school do you go to?’) to check for any evidence of hoarseness (unilateral recurrent laryngeal nerve lesion), and to cough to check for the ‘bovine’ cough of bilateral recurrent laryngeal nerve lesions: these are very rare in paediatric patients but are easy to test, for completeness.

The eleventh cranial nerve supplies the sternocleidomastoid and trapezius muscles. With your hand against the lateral aspect of the child’s face say, ‘Turn your head towards my hand’, or if that is not understood, choose something for the child to inspect over his or her shoulder and say ‘Look over there’. When this movement is performed, inspect and palpate the bulk of the sternomastoid, then repeat the process for the other side. Ask the child to ‘shrug your shoulders’ (demonstrate this), and then to repeat this against resistance (your hands). Note the bulk of the trapezius muscles.

At the completion of the examination, summarise your findings and give a differential diagnosis. The remainder of the examination should be directed towards confirming any suspected diagnosis, which may entail examination of the gait, lower limbs, upper limbs or neuromuscular assessment (see Figure 13.3).

image

Figure 13.3 Visual pathways (left side of diagram) and representative lesions resulting in visual field loss (right side of diagram). (1, 2 and 3 are represented only on the right side of the diagram.) Redrawn from; D. P. Edward, L. M. Kaufman, Pediatric Clinics of North America, Volume 50 (2003), pp. 16 to 17, Figure 14. (1) Normal visual field showing normal blind spot. (2) Bilateral macular lesion (exp. congenital toxoplasmosis) with central scotoma both eyes (OU). (3) Tunnel visual fields OU as seen in advanced glaucoma. (4) Optic nerve lesion in the left eye (OS), resulting in ipsilateral unilateral loss of vision. (5) Junction lesion in the right eye (OD) damaging optic nerve OD and decussating inferonasal retinal fibres OS that project into contralateral optic nerve (Wilbrand’s knee), resulting in loss of vision OD and superotemporal wedge scotoma OS. (6) Optic chiasm lesion resulting in bitemporal hemianopsia. (7) Optic tract lesion on right, resulting in left homonymous hemianopsia. (8) Optic radiation fibres from the ipsilateral inferotemporal retina and contralateral inferonasal retina course laterally from the lateral geniculate nucleus into the parietal lobe. Lesions of these fibres on the left side result in bilateral incongruous right superior quadrantanopsia. (9) Optic radiation fibres from the ipsilateral superotemporal retina and contralateral superonasal retina course directly posterior from the lateral geniculate nucleus into the parietal lobe. Lesions of these fibres on the left side result in bilateral incongruous right inferior quadrantanopsia. (10) A complete left optic radiation lesion resulting in right homonymous hemianopsia. (11) Lesion of the ventral aspect of the left occipital cortex, resulting in right homonymous hemianopsia with macular sparing. (12) Lesion of the dorsal aspect of the right occipital cortex, resulting in left homonymous central scotoma. (Illustrations by Adrienne J. Boutwell and Lisa J. Birmingham D University of Illinois Board of Trustees 2002.).

Share this: