Neuroimmune functional interactions

Published on 03/03/2015 by admin

Filed under Neurology

Last modified 22/04/2025

Print this page

rate 1 star rate 2 star rate 3 star rate 4 star rate 5 star
Your rating: none, Average: 0 (0 votes)

This article have been viewed 2018 times

15 Neuroimmune functional interactions

Introduction

The connection between the nervous system and the immune system has been postulated seriously for the past century, and in the past two decades in particular we have experienced an explosion in the amount of interest and research into the neuroimmune communication and integration systems. Experimental evidence from the fields of psychology, immunology, and neurology has demonstrated that the immune system is not an autonomously regulated system but is influenced and modulated by bidirectional communication with the central nervous system. In fact, it is getting very difficult to separate what constitutes psychology, neurology, and immunology when we talk about the functions of the big three supersystems. The key role of the immune system is the defence against antigens and pathogens that attempt to enter our bodies. Allergic hypersensitivity and autoimmunity are two situations where the immune system for some reason reacts inappropriately against a certain antigen or starts attacking the components of our own bodies, respectively. Understanding how and why this happens may lead us to a way of manipulating the activity of the immune system in order to relieve suffering in our fellow man. We are learning more and more everyday and the exciting discovery of cortical asymmetry, and its influence on immune function has given us another virtually uncharted avenue of exploration. Brain asymmetry is associated with different patterns of immune reactivity. Left brain deficits have been associated with a decline in NK and T-cell activity and IL-2 production, suggesting a dominance of the left side of the brain in immunomodulation.

Overview of the immune system

The immune system is a complex system of interacting components including physical barriers, bone marrow, lymphoid tissues, leukocytes, and soluble mediators. These elements function together to recognise, engulf, and destroy invading microbes, tumour cells, and any substance recognised as non-self. For the immune system to mount an effective response to invading antigens an intricate series of cellular events must occur. The antigen must be recognised and, if deemed necessary, bound and processed by antigen-presenting cells, which must then communicate with activated T and B cells. The T-helper cells must then assist in the activation and formation of B cells and cytotoxic T cells. Activated cells must then undergo a series of proliferative steps that involve activation of second and third messengers and selective genetic proliferation that result in an adequate response to the antigen presenting. Once an antigen has presented, a memory cell must be produced to enable a more efficient and deadly defence should the antigen present again in the future (Roitt 1994). To further complicate matters, all of these complex activities must be accomplished in a controlled and selective manner so as not to destroy cells or tissues not contaminated or of use to the host.

Cells of the immune system

Although all of the components of the immune system must function in a multifactorial interactive process in order to function effectively, the most crucial cell types involved are the leukocytes or white blood cells (WBCs), which form the mobile foot soldiers of the immune system (Fig. 15.1). Leukocytes normally account for about 1% of total blood volume. In normal circumstances the WBC number between 4000 and 11 000 per cubic millimetre of blood, with an average of 7000 (Marieb 1995; Guyton & Hall 1996).

Leukocytes are grouped into two major categories, granulocytes and agranulocytes, based on their structural and chemical properties. Granulocytes contain highly specialised cytoplasmic granules. Agranulocytes lack any obvious intercellular granules. Granulocytes include neutrophils, basophils, and eosinophils. Agranulocytes include the T and B lymphocytes and non-T and non-B lymphocytes.

Neutrophils, or polymorphonuclear leukocytes, are derived from pleuripotent haematopoietic stem cells and eventually differentiate from myeloid cells in the bone marrow. Neutrophils are short-lived cells with a lifespan of hours to days, but are present in large numbers in the bone marrow, peripheral blood, and marginal pool, which is a reserve of cells adherent to the walls of postcapillary venules. These cells are crucial to the host defence against bacteria and some fungi. Neutrophils and monocytes can move from the bloodstream into the tissues by a process called diapedesis. In this process the leukocytes squeeze through tiny pores in the vessel walls by assuming the size and shape of the pores. Once in the tissues the cells move around by amoeboid-like motion (Guyton & Hall 1996).

Neutrophils become phagocytic upon encountering bacteria and bacterial killing is promoted by a process called respiratory burst, in which oxygen is metabolised to produce hydrogen peroxide, an oxidising, bleach-like substance which kills bacteria. Neutrophils can become actively phagocytic immediately upon confrontation with an antigen and do not have to experience a period of maturation as do other cells like monocytes which need to undergo activation processes to eventually mature into macrophages.

Eosinophils are filled with large, course granules that contain a variety of unique digestive enzymes. These cells exhibit chemotaxis to the sites of basophil and mast cell activation but are weak phagocytes for pathogens. These cells are mainly involved in attacking parasitic organisms too large to be phagocytised and are also probably involved in the deactivation of inflammatory substances released by mast cells and basophils to prevent widespread activity of these agents to other tissues not involved.

Basophils are the rarest white blood cells. They are morphologically very similar to the large mast cells that inhabit tissues exposed to the outside environment such as nasal passages and the lungs. Their cytoplasm contains large cytoplasmic granules containing histamine, heparin, bradykinin, slow-reacting substance of anaphylaxis, and serotonin. Histamine is an inflammatory chemical that acts as a vasodilator, which makes blood vessels ‘leaky’ and also attracts other WBC to the site of injury or inflammation. Heparin is a substance that reduces the ability of blood to clot.

The agranulocytes, as stated above, include lymphocytes and monocytes. Monocytes are only agranulocytic before they mature to macrophages and become granulocytic in nature.

Monocytes are derived from myeloid precursor cells in the bone marrow, which migrate through the circulation to the tissues where they mature as macrophages. Monocytes have very little contribution to immunity until they have matured into macrophages. Often, in people who are actively fighting a serious infection, the numbers of monocytes in the blood will increase but have little involvement in the immunological processes until they are activated and mature into macrophages. Macrophages are highly mobile and are actively phagocytic. These cells have lifespans ranging from months to years depending on how often and to what severity they are called upon to fight antigens (Guyton & Hall 1996). These cells have three important immunological roles:

The macrophages are particularly concentrated in the lung and the liver where they are referred to as Kupffer cells, and the lining of the spleen sinusoids and lymph node medullary sinuses. They also occur in large concentrations in the glomerulus of the kidney where they are referred to as mesangial cells, in the brain where they are known as the microglial cells, and in bone where they form the class of cells called osteoclasts which engulf components of bone in the remodelling process.

When neutrophils and macrophages attack pathogens a number of them are also killed in the battle. The resulting necrotic tissue, dead macrophages, dead neutrophils, and tissue-fluid accumulation due to the process of inflammation, results in an interesting mixture referred to as pus. Generally, after a few days the pus is reabsorbed by the surrounding tissues and most of the evidence that it ever existed disappears. Occasionally, this process does not occur, and a pus-filled cavity called an abscess may form that needs to be mechanically drained before healing can occur.

Lymphocytes are the primary cells of the cellular immune response. These cells originally derive from pluripotent stem cells in the bone marrow and eventually differentiate into T cells, B cells, non-T cells, and non-B cells in the various lymphoid tissues of the body. Lymphocytes develop in the thymus and populate the germinal centres in the lymph nodes and spleen. Although there are large numbers of lymphocytes in the body very few are present normally in the peripheral blood. Usually the only lymphocytes present in the blood are those travelling to a specific lymphoid tissue or those travelling to the site of an infection. About 80% of the lymphocytes present in peripheral blood are T cells, which have many important functions including (Simon 1991):

There are three major populations of T cells that are antigen-bearing: helper T cells, cytotoxic T cells, and suppressor T cells. Both the helper and suppressor T cells are involved in the regulation aspect of the immune response, mainly the initiation and termination, respectively. Recent understanding of the structural differences in the membrane glycoproteins of these cells has led to a new classification system. CD4 or T4 cells express a specific glycoprotein structural receptor on their membranes specific for primary helper T cells. Two classes of helper T cells have also been distinguished and are referred to as Th1 and Th2 classes. These cells show different levels of activation and cytokine production that regulates the shift between cellular and humeral immunity processes (see below). The CD4 receptor moiety is the suspected attachment site for the HIV virus, which exclusively targets helper T cells. CD8 or T8 cells express a specific glycoprotein structural receptor on their membranes specific for both cytotoxic and suppresser T cells populations (Marieb 1995).

B lymphocytes develop in the bone marrow and undergo a secondary differentiation when exposed to an antigen to become non-dividing plasma cells which secrete immunoglobulins or antibodies. Plasma cells develop an elaborate intercellular rough endoplasmic reticulum which is capable of secreting huge amounts of antibody. Non-T, non-B cells do not carry the surface marker glycoproteins of either T or B cells. The major cell type of this class is the natural killer cells, which are capable of killing a large variety of non-specific targets without the presence of antibody or without the prior sensitisation of antibodies present (Simon 1991). These cells are augmented by interferons, which are a family of broad-spectrum antiviral agents synthesised by cells when they become infected with a viral agent (Heaney & Golde 1998).

Innate and specific immunity

The characteristics of innate immunity or non-specific immunity include its limited capacity to distinguishing one microbe from another, and it is a system that functions in much the same way against most infectious agents. The principle components of innate immunity are:

The complement system is a collection of a variety of proteins (approximately 20) present in the plasma and paracapillary tissue spaces. Many of these proteins exist in the form of precursors that can activate a cascade of reactions that terminate in the death or destruction of a target pathogen (Fig. 15.2). In normal circumstances the precursors remain inactive in the plasma unless they are activated in one of two ways:

Innate immunity provides the early line of defence against microbes. In contrast to innate immunity, specific immunity involves more highly evolved defence mechanisms stimulated by exposure to infectious agents and has the ability to increase the magnitude of response with each successive exposure to a particular antigen.

The characteristics of adaptive or specific immunity are specificity for distinct molecules, specialisation, and ‘memory’ capability that allows a more vigorous response to repeated exposure to the same microbe. The components of specific immunity are the lymphocytes and their products. Foreign substances that induce specific responses such as the production of antibodies are called antigens. These two systems do not function in isolation but act in an integrated fashion. Innate immunity not only provides early defence against microbes, but also plays an important role in the induction of specific immune responses. One mechanism that illustrates this cooperative effort occurs when a macrophage is exposed to an inflammatory stimulus; it secretes protein hormones called cytokines that promote activation of the lymphocytes specific for the microbial antigens. Another mechanism of interaction occurs when macrophages that have ingested microbes secrete a particular cytokine which stimulates development of T lymphocytes particularly effective at activating macrophage activity. Thus, the interactions between innate and specific immunity are bidirectional (Roitt 1994).

Specific immune responses are able to combat microbes that have evolved to successfully resist innate immunity. The specific responses may also function by enhancing the activities of the innate system such as in the binding of antibodies (produced by the specific system) to bacteria, which markedly enhances complement activation (innate system). Specific immune responses are classified into two types based on the components of the system that mediate these responses: humoral and cell-mediated immunity. Both types of immunity are initiated by exposure to an antigen.

Humoral response

The primary humoral responses occur when an antigen binds to the surface receptors of a B-lymphocytic cell, causing activation of a variety of second and third messengers that eventually result in the activation and replication of cellular DNA to initiate synthesis of antibodies or immunoglobulins (Igs). The activation of surface receptors causes the B lymphocyte to multiply into a series of clones that mature into plasma cells capable of secreting antibodies (Igs) against the antigen (Fig. 15.5). Some of these B lymphocytes become memory cells, which are capable of storing the memory of the assaulting antigen in case re-exposure occurs in the future. This results in the secondary humoral response, which involves the IgM antibodies and is much more vigorous and rapid than the primary response. The antibodies produced combine with the specific antigen that stimulated their production and form an antigen–antibody complex that allows other cells such as macrophages, natural killer cells, and neutrophils to recognise and destroy the antigen-bearing complex.

Antigens

The antibody molecule or immunoglobulin (Ig) is composed of two identical heavy and two identical light chain peptides held together by interchain disulfide bonds (Figs 15.6 and 15.7). Five classes of antibody have been identified, each with a variety of subgroups also identified. These classes of antibody are IgG, IgA, IgM, IgE, and IgD.

Cell-mediated immune response

Cell-mediated immunity involves the T-lymphocyte cell series which, unlike B lymphocytes, are unable to recognise free antigens but can only respond to processed fragments of protein antigens displayed on the surfaces of the body’s own cells. The T-lymphocyte attack is directed against body cells infected with viruses, bacteria or intracellular parasites, and cells recognised as non-self such as transplanted or infused tissue (Marieb 1995).

Discrimination of self from non-self is one of the most remarkable properties of every normal individual’s immune system. This ability is called self-tolerance. Self-tolerance is maintained partly by the elimination of lymphocytes that may express receptor specific for self-antigens and partly by functional inactivation of self-reactive lymphocytes after their encounter with self-antigens. The T lymphocyte recognises ‘self’ and ‘non-self’ by proteins on the cell membrane called major histocompatibility complex (MHC).

The MHC is a region of highly polymorphic genes whose product proteins are expressed on the surfaces of a variety of cells. This allows T lymphocytes the ability to survey the body for the presence of peptides derived from foreign proteins. There are two different types of MHC gene products called class I and class II MHC molecules. Any given T lymphocyte recognises foreign peptides bound to only one class I or one class II MHC molecule (Fig. 15.10) (Abbas et al. 1997).

Class I MHC proteins are present on all cells of the body except red blood cells. These allow the T cells to recognise ‘self’. Class II MHC proteins are present only on B cells, some T cells, and antigen-presenting cells such as macrophages. The proteins of class II MHC are composed of pieces of foreign antigen that have been phagocytosed and broken down by intracellular mechanisms and recycled back to the plasma membrane. The role of MHC proteins in the immune response is extremely important because they provide the means for signalling the immune system cells that infected or cancerous cells are present but camouflaged inside our own cells (Roitt 1994).

One form of communication between the brain and the immune system probably occurs via the autonomic nervous system

Anatomically, the autonomic outflow of the autonomic nervous system occurs through a neuron chain consisting of a pre- and postganglionic component. The autonomic system can be divided into three functionally and histologically distinct components: the parasympathetic, sympathetic, and enteric systems.

The parasympathetic system communicates via several cranial nerves including the oculomotor (CN III) nerve, the trigeminal (CN V) nerve, the facial (CN VII) nerve, and the vagus (CN X) nerve. The vagus nerve and sacral nerve roots compose the major output route of parasympathetic enteric system control (Furness & Costa 1980). The neurotransmitter released both pre- and postsynaptically is acetylcholine. Functionally, the neurological output from the parasympathetic system is the integrated end product of a complex interactive network of neurons spread throughout the mesencephalon, pons, and medulla. This complex interactive network receives modulatory input from wide areas of the neuraxis including all areas of cortex, limbic system, hypothalamus, cerebellum, thalamus, vestibular nuclei, basal ganglia, and spinal cord (Walberg 1960; Angaut & Brodal 1967; Brodal 1969; Brown 1974; Webster 1978). The relationship of the parasympathetic outflow to the immune system has received very little study to date and as a consequence very little is known about the influence of parasympathetic or the enteric system on immune function.

The sympathetic system enjoys a wide-ranging distribution to virtually every tissue of the body. The presynaptic neurons live in a region of the grey matter of the spinal cord called the intermediomedial and intermediolateral cell columns. The output of the preganglionic neurons of the sympathetic system is the summation of a complex interactive process involving segmental afferent input from dorsal root ganglion and suprasegmental input from the hypothalamus, limbic system, and all areas of cortex via the mesencephalic and pontomedullary reticular formations (Donovan 1970; Webster 1978; Williams & Warwick 1984). Most postganglionic fibres of the sympathetic nervous system release norepinephrine as their neurotransmitter. The chromaffin cells of the adrenal medulla, which are embryological homologues of the paravertebral ganglion cells, are also innervated by preganglionic sympathetic fibres which fail to synapse in the paravertebral ganglia. When stimulated, these cells release a neurotransmitter/neurohormone that is a mixture of epinephrine and norepinephrine with a 4:1 predominance of epinephrine (Elenkov et al. 2000).

Both epinephrine and norepinephrine are manufactured via the tyrosine–dihydroxyphenylalanine (DOPA)–dopamine pathway and are called catecholamines. When the body is in a neutral environment, catecholamines contribute to the maintenance of homeostasis by regulating a variety of functions such as cellular fuel metabolism, heart rate, blood vessel tone, blood pressure and flow dynamics, thermogenesis and as explained below, certain aspects of immune function. When a disturbance in the homeostatic state is detected, both the sympathetic nervous system and the hypothalamus–pituitary–adrenal axial system become activated in the attempt to restore homeostasis via the resulting increase in both systemic (adrenal) and peripheral (postganglionic activation) levels of catecholamines and glucocorticoids. In the 1930s, Hans Selye described this series of events or reactions as the general adaptation syndrome or generalised stress response (Selye 1936). Centrally, two principal mechanisms are involved in this general stress response; these are the production and release of corticotrophin-releasing hormone produced in the paraventricular nucleus of the hypothalamus and increased norepinephrine release from the locus ceruleus norepinephrine-releasing system in the brainstem. Functionally, these two systems cause mutual activation of each other through reciprocal innervation pathways (Chrousos & Gold 1992). Activation of the locus ceruleus results in an increased release of catecholamines, of which the majority is norepinephrine, to wide areas of cerebral cortex, subthalamic, and hypothalamic areas. The activation of these areas results in an increased release of catecholamines from the postganglionic sympathetic fibres as well as from the adrenal medulla (Fig. 15.11).

Catecholamine-releasing nerve fibres have been found in a wide range of cells and tissues including thymus, spleen, lymph nodes, tonsils, bone marrow, mucosa-associated lymphoid tissue (MALT), gut-associated lymphoid tissue (GALT), and the parenchyma of lymphoid tissues not associated with blood vessels. Generally, these areas of adrenogenic innervation appear to be in areas with high concentrations of T lymphocytes, macrophages, and plasma cells. This is in contrast to areas of high concentrations of developing B lymphocytes, which seem to be poorly innervated by these fibres (Felten et al. 1985). The appearance of these fibres occurs early in the development of these cell types, suggesting a possible role in the maturation and development process of these cell types and in immune system maturation (Elenkov et al. 2000). Current understanding of synaptic transmission processes suggests that the majority of the interactions between the above described cell types and the nerve fibres in the lymphoid tissues occur via an alternate form of synaptic transmission recently termed ‘nonsynaptic transmission’ (Vizi & Labos 1991; Vizi 2000). In this alternate form of neurotransmission, neurotransmitters are released from postsynaptic sympathetic neurons and diffuse over relatively large distances before interacting with receptors on the various cell types previously described. Thus three main classes of neurochemical interactions in sympathetic/immune communication may be identified. These include fast synaptic transmission, moderately fast nonsynaptic transmission, and slow neurohormonal transmission. Nonsynaptic transmission may also play a role in the norepinephrine regulation of blood flow in various tissues and also in modulating lymphocyte trafficking through the body (Villaro et al. 1987).

Neuroimmune interactions

Our understanding of the bidirectional communication between the nervous and the immune system has developed over the past 25 or so years to the point that it is clear that these two systems have a well-developed bidirectional communications system, involving neurotransmitters and cytokines (Besedovsky et al. 1981; Ader & Cohen 1982). Cytokines are a group of chemical mediators utilised by cells as a form of communication. A vast number of cytokines have been identified to date (Tables 15.1 and 15.2).

Cytokines such as interleukin-1 (IL-1), interleukin-6 (IL-6), and tumour necrosis factor-alpha (TNF-α) can signal the brain via a complex pathway involving the activation of both the sympathetic nervous system and the hypothalamic–pituitary–adrenal axis. The involvement of both fast-acting and slow-acting mechanisms suggests that both acute and chronic types of interactions are possible and, in fact, occur functionally (Berkenbosch et al. 1989; Elenkov et al. 1996).

Communication between sympathetic neurons and other cells is mediated by two principal types of receptors. These principal types of receptors have been classified as alpha (α) and beta (β) adrenergic receptors. Both classes have subsequently been subclassified to include beta 1, 2, and 3 and alpha 1 and 2 subtypes, with even more subtypes in each class known to exist. A crucial discovery in relating the nervous system to the immune system occurred when it was observed that beta adrenergic receptors are found on all types of lymphoid cells. The quantity across various cell types seems to vary, with natural killer cells having the greatest density and helper T lymphocytes having the lowest density (Khan et al. 1986; Maisel et al. 1990). Recent investigations have demonstrated that two subclasses of helper T lymphocytes show different receptor characteristics with the helper type-1 lymphocytes expressing beta-2 adrenergic receptors on their membrane but these same receptors are not expressed on type-2 helper lymphocyte membranes (Sanders 1998). As we shall discuss later, this receptor variation may play an important part in the different functional reactions of these two lymphocyte subclasses.

Once activated, the beta adrenergic receptors activate a chain of G-proteins that act as intracellular effectors, which in turn stimulate the activation of a series of successive enzymes such as adenylate cyclase, cyclic adenosine monophosphate (cAMP), inositol-1,4,5-triposphate (IP3), and diacylglycerol (DAG) (see Chapter 3). Variations in the intracellular concentrations of these various ‘second messenger’ enzymes result in different functional outcomes. Activity of different receptors can also alter the production and activation thresholds of second messengers within the cell. For example, the activation of adrenergic–G-protein complexes usually results in inhibition of adenylate cyclase and a subsequent decrease in the production of cAMP in the cell. cAMP has been shown to modulate a variety of transcription factors important in the expression of various genes, including those genes involved in the production of a variety of cytokines produced in lymphocytes. Thus activation of beta-2 adrenergic receptors by catecholamines usually results in a decreased transcription rate of genes responsible for the production of TNF-α and IL-12. The same receptor activation pathway also stimulates the activation of genes that transcribe the production enzymes for IL-10 (Elenkov et al. 1995; Hasko et al. 1998). This series of events is important in the activation shift between cellular and humoral immunity, as outlined below.

The T-lymphocyte subclasses, T-helper type 1 (Th1) and T-helper type 2 (Th2), are both components of the cellular or acquired immunity response but may activate or inhibit activity of other immune responses via cytokine mechanisms. Th1 lymphocytes primarily produce and release interferon gamma (IFN-γ), IL-2, and TNF-α, which promote cellular immunity processes, whereas Th2 lymphocytes produce and release a different set of cytokines, namely IL-1, IL-4, IL-10, and IL-13, which promote humoral immunity processes (Abbas et al. 1996; Grohmann et al. 2000). Unactivated CD41 lymphocytes (Th0) are lymphocytes that have not been exposed to an antigen and are referred to as antigen inexperienced or naive. These cells are bipotential and have the capability to develop into either Th1 or Th2 lymphocytes. Which development pathway these cells follow will depend to a large extent on the cytokines released by the antigen-presenting cells that initially induce their activation. For instance, IL-12 produced by a macrophage presenting an antigen acts in concert with other signalling mechanisms to induce the development of Th1-type lymphocytes. Because Th1 lymphocytes are involved in the production of IL-12, TNF-α, and IFN-γ, these lymphocytes are considered to promote the process of inflammation and are classed functionally as proinflammatory lymphocytes. In contrast, the Th2 lymphocytes promote anti-inflammatory processes and are termed as such (Trinchieri 1995; Mosmann & Sad 1996).

The cytokines produced in Th1-type lymphocytes inhibit the response and activation of Th2-type lymphocytes and vice versa. Thus IL-4 and IL-10 inhibit Th1 responses and IL-12 inhibits Th2 responses. The Th2 production of IL-10 promotes the stimulation of humoral immunity by stimulating both the growth and activation of mast cells and eosinophils and the activation and maturation of B lymphocytes to plasma cells. This cytokine also stimulates the plasma cell into the process of immunoglobulin switching from IgG to IgE, all of which inhibit the production of Th1 proinflammatory cytokines and promote anti-inflammatory states in the region. The activation of catecholamine receptors on T-helper cells seems to inhibit type-1 activities and favour type-2 activities. This results in a functional shift from cellular immunity towards humoral immunity. The major mechanism involved in this shift is the inhibition of IL-12 via stimulation of beta-2 adrenergic receptors. Activation of these same receptors also results in the inhibition of TNF-α, another proinflammatory cytokine, while at the same time promoting the production of IL-10, one of the most potent anti-inflammatory cytokines (Suberville et al. 1996) (Fig. 15.12).

The discussion thus far has focused on the systemic effects of catecholamine release on the balance between cellular and humoral immunity in T-helper lymphocytes. Locally, these responses may be different to that discussed earlier. In local responses in specific tissue areas release of catecholamines may result in predominately alpha receptor stimulation, which promotes the activation of inflammatory responses through the stimulation and recruitment of polymorphonuclear leukocytes in the regions involved. This proinflammatory process occurs through a complex series of interactions involving chemotactic cytokines called chemokines. Other components of the immune system seem to be modulated by the activity of catecholamines. Natural killer cells seem to be inhibited by catecholamine release and, in fact, may be the most sensitive cell type to the circulating concentration of catecholamines due to the large number of beta-2 adrenergic receptors on their membranes (Irwin 1994). The effect of catecholamines on macrophage function is complex and appears to be somewhat dependent on the state of activation of the macrophage at the time of interaction. Some evidence suggests that naive or non-antigen challenged macrophages may respond more aggressively to alpha adrenergic receptor stimulation, which results in increased activation of the macrophage. Activated macrophages show increased receptiveness to beta-adrenergic receptor stimulation, which results in a reduction in activation or an inhibition of activity. The final activation state of a macrophage may also depend on the presence of other cytokines or proinflammatory mediators in the immediate environment of the cell (Baker & Fuller 1995). The effect of catecholamines on cytotoxic (CD8+) lymphocytes is sketchy at best. Some indication that catecholamines may stimulate the development of CD8+ lymphocytes but inhibit their functional activity at the same time has been postulated (Benschop et al. 1996). Neutrophil function appears to be inhibited by catecholamines over a wide range of activities including phagocytosis, chemotaxis, release of lysosomal enzymes, and superoxide formation (Zurier et al. 1974; Gibson-Berry et al. 1993).

Can immune function be modulated by different areas of cortex?

There is widespread evidence that asymmetric lateralisation of cortical functioning does occur. Several of the lateralised functions are also known to be involved in brain neuroimmune modulation such as emotional arousal, sympathetic innervation, neurotransmitter concentrations, and neuroendocrine activity (Wittling 1998). It would seem from the widespread evidence of cortical functional hemispheric dominance in other systems that modulation of the immune system would also fall under asymmetric cortical control.

A growing body of evidence indicates that immune system function is modulated by different areas of the cortex in an asymmetrical fashion. For instance, a variety of studies have demonstrated that the rostral portions of the frontal cortical areas are differentially activated when the individual is exposed to different emotional stimulus and that the activation state experienced altered the immune response of the individual (Kang et al. 1991). The left frontal cortex appears to be activated during the expression or experience of positive emotional states, whereas the right frontal cortex seems to be activated during the expression or experience of negative emotional states (Davidson 1984; Leventhal & Tomarken 1986; Silberman & Weingartner 1986; Davidson & Tomarken 1989). One of the difficulties in this type of research is the huge individual variability of immune responses in individuals that occurs to a variety of cognitive stimulus. A few studies have tried to specifically address this problem and the results indicate that individual responses can be significantly correlated to immunological change. For instance, individuals with depression seem to show a range of immune activation, which is dependent on the severity of the depressive symptoms (Irwin et al. 1990). The severity of symptoms in depression has been linked to the activation levels in the left frontal cortex (Robinson et al. 1984). Those patients with left frontal cortex lesions but sparing of the right frontal cortex showed the most severe depressive symptoms, which suggests that the asymmetrical activation levels between the right and left cortical areas may also be important in the modulation of immune response (Davidson et al. 1990). Another study showed that individual personality traits were predictive of natural killer cell activity both before and after a stressful event (Kiecolt-Glaser et al. 1984). Another study found that natural killer cell activity was significantly increased in human females with extreme left frontal cortical activation when compared to females with extreme right cortical frontal activation (Kang et al. 1991). The level of hemispheric activation in these women was determined by electroencephalographic (EEG) determinants of regional alpha power density. This measurement has been shown to be inversely related to emotional or cognitive brain activation (Davidson 1988).

A variety of animal studies have also provided direct evidence of the relationship between cerebral asymmetry and immune system function (Barneoud et al. 1987; Neveu 1988). Partial ablation of the left frontoparietal cortex in mice, which results functionally in relative right cortical activation, resulted in decreased immune responses and partial right cortical ablation, which would result functionally in a left cortical activation, showed no change or a reduced immune response (Renoux et al. 1983; Neveu et al. 1986).

A variety of further studies have found several consistent findings relating to ablation of cortical areas and resultant immune dysfunction (Renoux et al. 1983; Biziere et al. 1985; Renoux & Biziere 1986; Barneoud et al. 1988). These finds show the following:

These findings indicate that T-cell-mediated immunity is modulated asymmetrically by both hemispheres, with each hemisphere acting in opposition to the other. Increased activity of the left cortex seems to enhance the responsiveness of a variety of T-cell-dependent immune parameters, whereas increased right cortical activity seems to be immunosuppressive. B-cell activity was found not to be affected by cortical activation asymmetry (Neveu et al. 1988; LaHoste et al. 1989).

In summary, most studies have shown that changes in hemispheric activation because of either ablation of cortical areas or modulation in physiological activation levels result in changes in immunological response activity. Both hemispheres seem to be active in the modulation of immune response, with the left hemisphere enhancing cellular immune responses and the right inhibiting those responses. Some evidence does suggest that the involvement of the right hemisphere may not act directly on immune components but may modulate the activity of the left hemisphere which does act directly to regulate immune function (Renoux et al. 1983).

Hemispheric chemical dominance can also influence the nature of immune reactivity. Various studies have shown that right hemispheric chemical dominance was associated with up-regulation of the hypothalamic-mediated isoprenoid pathway and was more prevalent among individuals with various metabolic and immune disorders including a high body mass index, various lung diseases including asthma and chronic bronchitis, increased levels of lipid peroxidation products, decreased free radical scavenging enzymes, inflammatory bowel disease, systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE), osteoarthritis, and spondylosis. Left hemispheric chemical dominance was associated with a down-regulated isoprenoid pathway and was more prevalent among individuals with low body mass index, osteoporosis, and bulimia.

Cerebellar–hypothalamic communication may also be important in immune system function

The posterior part of the dorsomedial hypothalamic nucleus and posterior hypothalamic nucleus receive direct, distinct projections from the cerebellum, whereas the anterior part of the dorsomedial hypothalamic nucleus does not. These observations bring a new perspective on the question of how the cerebellum is involved in the regulation of visceromotor functions.

The hypothalamo-cerebellar projections arise primarily from the lateral, posterior, and dorsal hypothalamic area; the dorsomedial, ventromedial, supramammillary, tuberomammillary, and lateral mammillary nuclei; and the periventricular zone. Available evidence suggests that hypothalamo-cerebellar fibres terminate in the neurons of the layers of the cerebellar cortex and cerebellar nuclei.

Cerebello-hypothalamic projections arise from all four cerebellar nuclei, pass through the superior cerebellar peduncle, cross in its decussation, follow the trajectory of cerebellothalamic fibres, and then separate from that thalamic fasciculus to enter the hypothalamus. These fibres terminate primarily in the contralateral lateral, posterior, and dorsal hypothalamic areas including the dorsomedial and paraventricular nuclei. Of particular interest to functional neurological practitioners is the influence of midline areas of the cerebellum on hypothalamic function. Midline areas of the cerebellum including the vermis of the cerebellar cortex and the midline fastigial nuclei communicate extensively with spinal, vestibular, visual, and auditory afferents.

The hypothalamo-neurohypophyseal system as well as the autonomic nervous system is involved in homeostatic responses associated with changes in head position and orthostatic reflex. The responses induced by body tilt on earth are thought to be attributed to changes in inputs from baroreceptors, vestibular organs, and proprioreceptors normally required for postural control. The information from these organs is sent to the hypothalamus, which thereby influences both neuroendocrine and autonomic systems as well as various kinds of emotional behaviour. The fastigial input to the hypothalamus suggested that the fastigial nucleus plays a significant role in these homeostatic responses through its connections with the brainstem and the hypothalamus (Katafuchi et al. 1995).

Does immune activity equate to appropriate immune function?

The complex nature of neuroimmune interactions has made interpreting the impact of these reactions on the health and well-being of the person in question very difficult. For example, in some cases an increase in certain cytokines may be appropriate and in other cases cause the person great despair. If we are just measuring the concentration of that cytokine without regard to appropriateness of its action, the true meaning of the increase may well be lost. It is also important to understand which aspects of immune function are being measured and if they are actually measuring immune function or just quantitative aspects of cell mobilisation. For instance, an increase in total lymphocyte count may not indicate the actual activity of those cells, which must undergo a complex interactive process of activation in order to actually perform their immune functions. A simple measure of concentration may be misleading.

All immune responses are initiated by recognition of foreign antigens. This leads to activation of lymphocytes that specifically recognise the antigen and hopefully culminates in the elimination of the antigen. The specific immune response consists of the binding of foreign antigens to specific receptors on the mature lymphocytes, the B lymphocytes. The cells of humoral immunity express antibody molecules on their surfaces that can bind foreign proteins, polysaccharides, or cell-associated forms. T lymphocytes are responsible for cell-mediated immunity, and express receptors that only recognise short peptides sequences in protein antigens present on the surfaces of other cells. The activation phase of immune response is the sequence of events induced in lymphocytes as a consequence of specific antigen recognition. All lymphocytes undergo two major changes in this phase. First, they proliferate, leading to expansion of the clone population of antigen-specific lymphocytes. Second, the progeny of these antigen-specific lymphocytes differentiate into effector cells capable of antigen elimination. The effector phase of immune response entails the specific activation of functions that lead to the elimination of antigen.

Immune function can be affected at any phase just described, and the effectiveness of the system depends on the complete interactive process as well as the appropriateness of the response at any given time in the individual. The appropriateness of the response may be partially under the modulation of the nervous system and thus asymmetries in neural function may result in inappropriate immune responses. The appropriateness of the neuroimmune response of the individual should be constantly assessed if possible and always a concern in the clinical management of any patient.

Clinical implications

It is clear from the previous discussion that the interactions between the nervous and immune systems are complicated and are multifactorial in nature. Inappropriate interaction via efferent or afferent loops of this communication system may result in dysfunction or disease (Fig. 15.13).

Inappropriate levels of systemic catecholamines have been associated with a variety of clinical conditions associated with immune dysfunction including (Elam et al. 1992; Jarek et al. 1993; Abbas et al. 1996; Li et al. 1997):

Several studies have investigated the effect of changes in spinal afferentiation as a result of manipulation on the activity of the sympathetic nervous system (Korr 1979; Sato 1992; Chiu & Wright 1996). Suprasegmental changes, especially in brain function, have demonstrated the central influence of altered afferentiation of segmental spinal levels (Thomas & Wood 1992; Carrick 1997; Kelly et al. 2000). Changes in immune system function can be mediated through spinal afferent mechanisms. These mechanisms may operate via suprasegmental or segmental levels by modulating the activity of the sympathetic nervous system (Beck 2003).

image Clinical case answers

Case 15.1

15.1.1

There is widespread evidence that asymmetric lateralisation of cortical functioning does occur. Several of the lateralised functions are also known to be involved in brain neuroimmuno-modulation such as emotional arousal, sympathetic innervation, neurotransmitter concentrations, and neuroendocrine activity. It would seem from the widespread evidence of cortical functional hemispheric dominance in other systems that modulation of the immune system would also fall under asymmetric cortical control.

A growing body of evidence indicates that immune system function is modulated by different areas of the cortex in an asymmetrical fashion. For instance, a variety of studies have demonstrated that the rostral portions of the frontal cortical areas are differentially activated when the individual is exposed to different emotional stimulus and that the activation state experienced altered the immune response of the individual. The left frontal cortex appears to be activated during the expression or experience of positive emotional states, whereas the right frontal cortex seems to be activated during the expression or experience of negative emotional states. Asymmetric activation of the cortex could lead to asymmetric activation of the sympathetic nervous system and catecholamine release, which alters immune function. The cortex itself develops two-way communication with the immune system and a reduction in activation that has resulted in the cognitive expression of depression may also affect immune function.

Case 15.2

15.2.1

Discrimination of self from non-self is one of the most remarkable properties of every normal individual’s immune system. This ability is called self-tolerance. Self-tolerance is maintained partly by the elimination of lymphocytes that may express receptors specific for self-antigens and partly by functional inactivation of self-reactive lymphocytes after their encounter with self-antigens. The T lymphocyte recognises ‘self’ and ‘non-self’ by proteins on the cell membrane called major histocompatibility complex (MHC).

The MHC is a region of highly polymorphic genes whose product proteins are expressed on the surfaces of a variety of cells. This allows T lymphocytes the ability to survey the body for the presence of peptides derived from foreign proteins. There are two different types of MHC gene products called class I and class II MHC molecules. Any given T lymphocyte recognises foreign peptides bound to only one class I or one class II MHC molecules.

Class I MHC proteins are present on all cells of the body except red blood cells. These allow the T cells to recognise ‘self’. Class II MHC proteins are present only on B cells, some T cells, and antigen-presenting cells such as macrophages. The proteins of class II MHC are composed of pieces of foreign antigen that have been phagocytosed and broken down by intracellular mechanisms and recycled back to the plasma membrane. The role of MHC proteins in the immune response is extremely important because they provide the means for signalling the immune system cells that infected or cancerous cells are present but camouflaged inside our own cells.

References

Abbas A., Lichtman A., Pober J. Cellular and Molecular Immunology, third ed. Philadelphia: Saunders, 1997.

Abbas A.K., Murphy K.M., Sher A. Functional diversity of helper T lymphocytes. Nature. 1996;383:787-793.

Ader R., Cohen N. Behaviorally conditioned immunosuppression and murine systemic lupus erythematosis. Science. 1982;215:1534-1536.

Angaut P., Brodal A. The projection of the vestibulocerebellum onto the vestibular nuclei of the cat. Arch. Italiennes de Biol.. 1967;105:441-479.

Baker A.J., Fuller R.W. Loss of responce to beta- adrenoreceptor agonists during the maturation of human monocytes to macrophages in vitro. J. Leukoc. Biol.. 1995;57:395-400.

Barneoud P., Neveu P.J., Vitiello S., et al. Functional heterogeneity of the right and left cerebral neocortex in the modulation of the immune system. Physiol. Behav.. 1987;41:525-530.

Barneoud P., Neveu P.J., Vitiello S., et al. Early effects of right or left cerebral cortex ablation on mitogen-induced speen lymphocyte DNA synthesis. Neurosci. Lett.. 1988;90:302-307.

Beck R.W. Psychoneuroimmunology. Beirman R., editor, Handbook of Clinical Diagnosis. 2003:27-35.

Benschop R.J., Rodriguez-Feuerhahn M., Schedlowski M. Catecholamine-induced leukocytosis: early observations, current research and future directions. Brain Behav. Immun.. 1996;10:77-91.

Berkenbosch F., de Goeij D., Rey A.D., et al. Neuroendrocrine sympathetic metabolic processes induced by interleukin-1. Neuroendocrinology. 1989;50:570-576.

Besedovsky H.O., del Rey A.E., Sorkin E. Lymphokine containing supernatants from Con A-stimulated cells increase cortisone blood levels. J. Immunol.. 1981;126:385-389.

Biziere K., Guillaumin J.M., Degenne D., et al. Lateralized neocortical modulation of the T-cell lineage. In: Guillermin R., Cohn M., Melnechuk T., editors. Neural Modulation of Immunity. New York: Raven Press; 1985:81-91.

Brodal A. Neurological Anatomy. London: Oxford University Press, 1969.

Brown L.T. Corticorubral projections in the rat. J. Comp. Neurol.. 1974;154:149-168.

Carrick F.R. Changes in brain function after manipulation of the cervical spine. J. Manipulative Physiol. Ther.. 1997;20(8):529-545.

Chiu T., Wright A. To compare the effects of different rates of application of a cervical mobilisation technique on sympathetic outflow to the upper limb in normal subjects. Man. Ther.. 1996;1(4):198-203.

Chrousos G.P., Gold P.W. The concepts of stress and stress system disorders: Overview of physical and behavioral homeostasis. JAMA. 1992;267:1244-1252.

Davidson R.J. Affect, cognition, and hemispheric specialization. In: Izard C.E., Kagan J., Zajonc R., editors. Emotion, Cognition and Behaviour. New York: Cambridge University Press; 1984:320-365.

Davidson R.J. EEG measures of cerebral asymmetry: conceptual and methodological issues. Int. J. Neurosci.. 1988;39:71-89.

Davidson R.J., Ekman P., Saron C.D., et al. Approach/withdrawal and cerebral asymmetry; emotional expression and brain physiology I. J. Pers. Soc. Psychol.. 1990;58:330-341.

Davidson R.J., Tomarken A.J. Laterality and emotion: and electrophysiological approach. In: Boller F., Grafman J., editors. Handbook of Neuropsychology. New York: Elsevier Science; 1989:419-441.

Donovan B.T. Mammillian Neuroendocrinology. New York: McGraw-Hill, 1970.

Elam M., Johansson G., Wallin B.G. Do patients with primary fibromyalgia have an altered muscle sympathetic nerve activity? Pain. 1992;48:371-375.

Elenkov I.J., Hasko G., Kovacs K.J., et al. Modulation of lipopolysaccharides induced tumour necrosis factor-alpha production by selective alpha and beta adrenergic drugs in mice. J. Neuroimmunol.. 1995;61:123-131.

Elenkov I.J., Papanicolaou D.A., Wilder R.L., et al. Modulatory effects of glucocorticoids and catecholamines on human interleukin-12 and interleukin-10 production: clinical implications. Proc. Assoc. Am. Physicians. 1996;108:374-381.

Elenkov I.J., Wilder R.L., Chrousos G.P., et al. The sympathetic nerve –an integrative interface between two supersystems: the brain and the immune system. Pharmacol. Rev.. 2000;52(4):595-638.

Felten D.L., Felten S.Y., Carlson S.L., et al. Noradrenergic and peptidergic innervation of lymphoid tissue. J. Immunol.. 1985;135(Suppl. 2):755-765s.

Furness J.B., Costa M. Types of nerves in the enteric nervous system. Neuroscience. 1980;5:1-20.

Gibson-Berry K.L., Whitin J.C., Cohen H.J. Modulation of the respiratory burst in human neutrophils by isoproterenol and dibutyryl cyclic AMP. J. Neuroimmunol.. 1993;43:59-68.

Grohmann U., van Snick J., Campanile F., et al. IL-9 protects mice from gram −ve bacterial shock, suppression of TNF-α, IL-12, and INF-γ and induction of IL-10. J. Immunol.. 2000;164:4197-4203.

Guyton A., Hall J. Textbook of Medical Physiology. Philadelphia: Saunders, 1996.

Hasko G., Szabo C., Nemeth Z.H., et al. Suppression of IL-12 production by phosphodiesterase inhibition in murine endotoxemia is IL-10 dependant. Eur. J. Immunol.. 1998;88:57-61.

Heaney M., Golde D. Soluble receptors in human disease. J. Leukoc. Biol.. 1998;64:135-146.

Irwin M. Stress induced immune suppression: the role of brain corticotropin releasing hormone and autonomic nervous systems mechanisms. Adv. Neuroimmunol.. 1994;4:29-47.

Irwin M., Patterson T., Smith T.L., et al. Reduction of immune function in life stress and depression. Biol. Psychiatry. 1990;27:22-30.

Jarek M.J., Legare E.J., McDermott M.T., et al. Endocrine profiles for outcome prediction from the intensive care unit. Crit. Care Med.. 1993;21:543-550.

Kang D.H., Davidson R.J., Coe C.L., et al. Frontal brain asymmetry and immune function. Behav. Neurosci.. 1991;105(6):860-869.

Katafuchi T., Hori T., Oomura Y., et al. Cerebellar afferents to neuroendocrine cells: implications for adaptive responses to simulated weightlessness. Endocr. J.. 1995;42(6):729-737.

Kelly D.D., Murphy B.A., Backhouse D.P. Use of a mental rotation reaction-time paradigm to measure the effects of upper cervical adjustments on Cortical processing: a pilot study. J. Manipulative Physiol. Ther.. 2000;23(4):246-251.

Khan M.M., Sansoni P., Silverman E.D., et al. Beta adrenergic receptors on human suppressor, helper, and cytolytic lymphocytes. Biochem. Pharmacol.. 1986;35:1137-1142.

Kiecolt-Glaser J.K., Garner W., Speicher C., et al. Psychosocial modifiers of immunocompetence in medical students. Psychosom. Med.. 1984;46:7-13.

Korr I.M. The spinal cord as organiser of disease processes: III. Hyperactivity of sympathetic innervation as a common factor in disease. J. Am. Osteopath. Assoc.. 1979;79(4):232-237.

LaHoste G.J., Neveu P.J., Mormede P., et al. Hemispheric asymmetry in the effects of cerebral cortical ablations on mitogen-induced lymphoproliferation and plasma prolactin levels in female rats. Brain Res.. 1989;483:123-129.

Leventhal H., Tomarken A.J. Emotion: today’s problems. Annu. Rev. Psychol.. 1986;37:565-610.

Li T., Harada M., Tamada K., et al. Repeated restraint stress impairs the antitumour T cell response through its suppressive effect on Th1-type CD4+ T cells. Anticancer Res.. 1997;17:4259-4268.

Maisel A.S., Harris T., Rearden C.A., et al. Beta adrenergic receptors in lymphocyte subsets after exercise. Alterations in normal individuals and patients with congestive heart failure. Circulation. 1990;82:2003-2010.

Marieb E. Human Anatomy and Physiology. New York: Benjamen/Cummings, 1995. pp. 594–595

Mosmann T.R., Sad S. The expanding universe of T-cell subsets, Th1, Th2, and more. Immunol. Today. 1996;17:138-146.

Neveu P.J. Minireview: cerebral neocortex modulation of immune functions. Life Sci.. 1988;42:1917-1923.

Neveu P.J., Barneoud P., Vitiello S., et al. Brain modulation of the immune system: association between lymphocyte responsiveness and paw preference in mice. Brain Res.. 1988;457:392-394.

Neveu P.J., Taghzouti K., Dantzer R., et al. Modulation of mitogen-induced lymphoproliferation by cerebral neocortex. Life Sci.. 1986;38:1907-1913.

Renoux G., Biziere K. Brain neocortex lateralized control of immune recognition. Integr. Psychiatry. 1986;4:32-40.

Renoux G., Biziere K., Renoux M., et al. A balanced brain asymmetry modulates T cell-mediated events. J. Neuroimmunol.. 1983;5:227-238.

Robinson R.G., Kubos K.L., Starr L.B., et al. Mood disorders in stroke patients: importance of location of lesion. Brain. 1984;107:81-93.

Roitt I. Essential Immunology, eight ed. London: Blackwell Scientific, 1994.

Sanders V.M. The role of norepinephrine and beta-2-adrenergic receptor stimulation in the modulation of Th1, Th2, and B lymphocyte function. Adv. Exp. Med. Biol.. 1998;437:269-278.

Sato A. The reflex effects of spinal somatic nerve stimulation on visceral function. J. Manipulative Physiol. Ther.. 1992;15(1):57-61.

Selye H. Thymus and the adrenals in the response of the organism to injuries and intoxications. Br. J. Exp. Pathol.. 1936;17:234-238.

Silberman E.K., Weingartner H. Hemispheric lateralization of functions related to emotion. Brain Cogn.. 1986;5:322-353.

Simon H.B. Exercise and human immune function. In: Ader R., Felten D.L., Cohen N., editors. Psychoneuroimmunology. San Diego, CA: Academic Press; 1991:869-895.

Sommers H. The indigenous microbiota of the human host. In: Youmans G.P., Patterson P.Y., Sommers H.M., editors. The Biological and Clinical Basis of Infectious Diseases. Philadelphia: WB Saunders; 1980:65-80.

Suberville S., Bellocq A., Fouqueray B., et al. Regulation of IL-10 production by beta adrenergic agonists. Eur. J. Immunol.. 1996;26:2601-2605.

Thomas M.D., Wood J. Upper cervical adjustments may improve mental function. J. Manipulative Med.. 1992;6:215-216.

Trinchieri G. Interleukin -12: a proinflammatory cytokine with immunoregulatory functions that bridge innate resistance and antigen specific adaptive immunity. Annu. Rev. Immunol.. 1995;13:251-276.

Villaro A.C., Sesma M.P., Vazquez J.J. Innervation of mouse lymph nodes: nerve endings on muscular vessels and reticular cells. Am. J. Anat.. 1987;179:175-185.

Vizi E.S. Role of high-affinity receptors and membrane transporters in nonsynaptic communication and drug action in the CNS. Pharmacol. Rev.. 2000;52:63-89.

Vizi E.S., Labos E. Nonsynaptic interactions at presynaptic level. Prog. Neurobiol.. 1991;37:145-163.

Walberg F. Further studies on the descending connections to the inferior olive. Reticulo-olivary fibers: an experimental study in the cat. J. Comp. Neurol.. 1960;114:79-87.

Webster K.E. The brainstem reticular formation. In: Hennings G., Hemmings W.A., editors. The Biological Basis of Schizophrenia. Lancaster: MTP Press, 1978.

Williams P.L., Warwick R. Gray’s Anatomy. Edinburgh: Churchill Livingstone, 1984.

Wittling W. Brain asymmetry in the control of autonomic-physiologic activity. In: Davidson R., Hugdahl K., editors. Brain Asymmetry. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 1998.

Youmans G. Host bacterial interaction: external defense mechanisms. In: Youmans G.P., Patterson P.Y., Sommers H.M., editors. The Biological and Clinical Basis of Infectious Diseases. Philadelphia: WB Saunders, 1980.

Zurier R.B., Weissmann G., Hoffstein S., et al. Mechanisms of lysosomal enzyme release from human leukocytes. II. Effects of cAMP and cGMP, autonomic agonists, and agents which affect microtubule function. J. Clin. Invest.. 1974;53:297-309.