Nephrolithiasis

Published on 14/03/2015 by admin

Filed under Emergency Medicine

Last modified 22/04/2025

Print this page

rate 1 star rate 2 star rate 3 star rate 4 star rate 5 star
Your rating: none, Average: 0 (0 votes)

This article have been viewed 1374 times

112 Nephrolithiasis

Pathophysiology

Renal stones form when the urine becomes supersaturated with calcium, oxalate, cystine, uric acid, or struvite. Hypercalciuria accounts for the development of 60% of calculi and results from increased intestinal absorption, decreased renal tubular reabsorption, or excessive bone resorption of calcium. Decreased urine output can further promote calculus formation as a result of reductions in citrate, magnesium pyrophosphate, and other inhibitors of urine crystallization. Table 112.1 describes features of the five main types of renal calculi.

Stone impaction may occur anywhere along the path of the genitourinary tract. The resultant ureteral obstruction can shift hydrostatic pressure and cause blood flow to be redistributed to the opposite renal artery. The overall rate of glomerular filtration decreases as renal excretion becomes a task of the unaffected kidney. A transient increase in serum creatinine may follow this decrease in the glomerular filtration rate.

Although an initial rise in creatinine may quickly resolve, irreversible kidney damage can begin to occur after 7 days of complete obstruction.3,4 Prolonged obstruction impairs recoverable kidney function over time,4,5 but case reports show that some recovery may be possible for up to 150 days.5,6

Ureteral obstruction is primarily determined by calculus size. Most stones smaller than 5 mm in diameter will pass spontaneously (90%), whereas passage of stones larger than 8 mm is unlikely (5%). Table 112.2 compares ureteral stone size with the percent likelihood of spontaneous passage.

Table 112.2 Renal Calculus Size and Likelihood of Spontaneous Passage

STONE SIZE (DIAMETER) PERCENT LIKELIHOOD OF SPONTANEOUS PASSAGE
<5 mm 90
5-8 mm 15
>8 mm 5

Clinical Presentation

Physical Examination

Patients with renal colic typically appear uncomfortable and are commonly described as “writhing” on the gurney. Findings on the abdominal examination are generally unremarkable, although thin patients with distal ureteral stones and obstruction may exhibit some tenderness. Tenderness at the costovertebral angle can develop as a result of worsening hydronephrosis; this sign is mild or absent early in the course of the disease. Abnormal findings on physical examination should raise suspicion for alternative diagnoses, as reviewed in Table 112.4.

Table 112.4 Physical Examination Findings and Potential Alternative Diagnoses

FINDING CONSIDERATION
Vital Signs
Fever Infected stone, pyelonephritis, perinephric abscess
Hypotension Sepsis, abdominal aortic aneurysm
Abdomen
Bruit Abdominal aortic aneurysm, renal artery stenosis
Pulsatile mass Abdominal aortic aneurysm
Pronounced costovertebral angle tenderness Pyelonephritis
Lower abdominal or pelvic tenderness Ectopic pregnancy, appendicitis, pelvic inflammatory disease, tuboovarian abscess, ovarian torsion
Genitourinary
Testicular tenderness Torsion, epididymitis, orchitis
Mass Hernia, cancer
Pulmonary
Focal findings Lobar pneumonia
Cardiovascular
Asymmetric lower extremity pulses Abdominal aortic aneurysm
Skin
Vesicular rash Herpes zoster

Diagnostic Testing

Laboratory Tests

Imaging

ED imaging (Table 112.5) is used to confirm the diagnosis of nephrolithiasis, evaluate stone size, identify obstruction, and exclude alternative diagnoses. Patients with decreased renal reserve (solitary kidney, uncontrolled diabetes mellitus, uncontrolled hypertension), concurrent infection, first occurrence of stone disease, advanced age, and prolonged or unrelenting symptoms should undergo imaging during their initial evaluation. Indications for emergency imaging in cases of suspected renal colic are summarized in Table 112.6.

Table 112.6 Indications for Diagnostic Imaging of Patients with Suspected Renal Colic

FINDING INDICATION FOR DIAGNOSTIC IMAGING
Solitary kidney, uncontrolled diabetes,* uncontrolled hypertension* To exclude obstruction in a patient with decreased renal reserve
Advanced age To exclude alternative diagnoses, especially vascular disease
Concurrent infection If concurrent with obstruction, a urologist should be involved to evaluate the need for intervention
Prolonged symptoms To evaluate for prolonged obstruction, which may cause renal impairment
Refractory symptoms, first occurrence* To exclude alternative diagnoses, especially ischemia or infarction

* Relative indication.

Intravenous Pyelography

Intravenous pyelography (Fig. 112.4) has a sensitivity of 52% to 85% and specificity of 97% to 100% for detection of ureteral calculi.11,17,18 It provides a visual interpretation of renal function, as well as genitourinary anatomy. The earliest sign of ureteral obstruction on an intravenous pyelogram is a delayed nephrogram; other abnormal findings include a “standing column” (the entire ureter seen on one image; Fig. 112.5), hydroureter, hydronephrosis, contrast cutoff at the point of impaction, and extravasation of contrast material. The use of intravenous pyelography is limited by the need for contrast material, decreased sensitivity in comparison with helical CT, and the length of time required to obtain multiple delayed images.

Sonography

Ultrasonography is a useful modality for identifying hydronephrosis caused by ureteral obstruction (Fig. 112.6). Advantages include its ease of use and rapid acquisition of diagnostic images at the bedside without the need for contrast agents or radiation. It is the imaging technique of choice for the evaluation of suspected renal colic in pregnancy. Ultrasonography is limited by false-negative results, which occur in patients with small calculi that do not cause significant obstruction or hydronephrosis. The sensitivity and specificity of ultrasonography for the diagnosis of urologic stone disease is 66% to 93% and 83% to 100%, respectively.1820

Plain Radiography

The utility of plain radiography (kidney-ureter-bladder [KUB] projection performed in the supine position) is dependent on the radiodensity of the suspected kidney stone. Although 90% of stones are radiopaque (Fig. 112.7), uric acid and cystine calculi are radiolucent. KUB imaging is limited technically by overlying soft tissue, air, and bone; low sensitivity (58% to 62%) and specificity (67% to 69%) are observed in clinical practice.21,22 The combination of ultrasonography and KUB radiography improves the usefulness of these imaging modalities. Studies that used both ultrasound and plain radiography for the detection of nephrolithiasis demonstrated a sensitivity and specificity of 89% and 100%, respectively, when both tests were positive20 and a sensitivity and specificity of 95% and 67%, respectively, when either test was positive.23

Treatment

Pharmacologic Management

Patients with renal colic will probably require immediate pain control. Several options are available for rapid analgesia.

Nonsteroidal Antiinflammatory Drugs

Nonsteroidal antiinflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) decrease ureteral spasm by inhibiting prostaglandin synthesis. Renal blood flow may be reduced when NSAIDs are administered in the setting of ureteral obstruction,24 thereby improving symptoms through a decrease in urine production and ureteric pressure. Ketorolac (Toradol) (30 mg intravenously or 60 mg intramuscularly) has efficacy equivalent to the oral administration of 800 mg of ibuprofen, although the latter may be less well tolerated in patients with concomitant nausea.

Some urologists debate the routine use of NSAIDs for the treatment of nephrolithiasis because these medications may promote bleeding after the placement of a ureteral stent. Data to support such observations are inconclusive.

Opiates

Intravenous narcotics provide adequate relief of symptoms for most patients with renal colic. Opiates have similar analgesic effects at equivalent dosing. Although meperidine (Demerol) demonstrates smooth muscle relaxation when tested in vitro,25 this spasmolytic effect does not appear to improve its clinical utility in therapy for renal colic.26 Given the potential for drug interactions with meperidine, preferred opiates for ED use include hydromorphone (0.015 mg/kg) and morphine (0.1 mg/kg starting dose).

Multiple studies have shown that both NSAIDs and opiates are effective and appropriate treatments of renal colic.2431 One metaanalysis of 19 studies showed that NSAIDs and opiates are equally effective in the acute management of renal colic symptoms.28 Many experts recommend the use of NSAIDs followed by opiates for continued pain.

Disposition

Patients with uncomplicated renal colic whose symptoms are easily controlled should be discharged with analgesics, a urine strainer, antiemetics, and follow-up within 7 days. Stones captured by urine straining should be brought to the urologist for pathologic evaluation. Return precautions include uncontrolled pain, protracted vomiting, and fever (Fig. 112.8).

A urologist should be consulted if patients have uncontrollable pain or evidence of infection. The presence of white blood cells in urine may indicate an infection and, in the presence of obstruction, warrants urology consultation for urgent stone removal or stenting.

Some patients will have a few white blood cells in their urine (e.g., <10) but no clinical signs of infection. These patients will be otherwise asymptomatic following medication for pain (i.e., afebrile). In the absence of concomitant obstruction, urgent stone removal in such cases is not routine. Patients with coexisting, complicating diseases may be treated with antibiotics and observed in the hospital. Patients without underlying disease may be treated with antibiotics as an outpatient and monitored carefully. A urine culture should be performed for patients with white blood cells in their urine.

Box 112.3 summarizes common indications for admission or urology consultation.

References

1 Trivedi B. Nephrolithiasis: how it happens and what to do about it. Nephrolithiasis. 1996;100:63–78.

2 Ahlstrand C, Tiselius H. Recurrences during a 10-year follow-up after first renal stone episode. Urol Res. 1990;18:397–399.

3 Kerr Jr, WS. Effect of complete ureteral obstruction for one week on kidney function. J Appl Physiol. 1954;6:762–772.

4 Vaughan E, Gillenwater J. Recovery following complete chronic unilateral ureteral occlusion: functional, radiographic and pathologic alterations. J Urol. 1971;106:27–35.

5 Shapiro S, Bennett A. Recovery of renal function after prolonged unilateral ureteral obstruction. J Urol. 1976;115:136–140.

6 Okubo K, Suzuki Y, Ishitoya S, et al. Recovery of renal function after 153 days of complete unilateral ureteral obstruction. J Urol. 1998;160:1422–1423.

7 Borrero E, Queral LA. Symptomatic abdominal aortic aneurysm misdiagnosed as nephroureterolithiasis. Ann Vasc Surg. 1988;2:45–49.

8 Stewart D, Kowalski R, Wong P, et al. Microscopic hematuria and calculus-related ureteral obstruction. J Emerg Med. 1990;8:693–695.

9 Luchs J, Katz D, Lane M, et al. Utility of hematuria testing in patients with suspected renal colic: correlation with unenhanced helical CT results. Urology. 2002;59:839–842.

10 Press S, Smith A. Incidence of negative hematuria in patients with acute urinary lithiasis presenting to the emergency room with flank pain. Urology. 1995;45:753–757.

11 Yilmaz S, Sindel T, Arslan S, et al. Renal colic: comparison of spiral CT, US and IVP in the detection of ureteral calculi. Eur Radiol. 1998;8:212–217.

12 Fielding J, Steele G, Fox L, et al. Spiral computerized tomography in the evaluation of acute flank pain: a replacement for excretory urography. J Urol. 1997;157:2071–2073.

13 Dalrymple N, Verga M, Anderson K, et al. The value of unenhanced helical computerized tomography in management of acute flank pain. J Urol. 1998;159:735–740.

14 Boulay I, Holtz P, Foley W, et al. Ureteral calculi: diagnostic efficacy of helical CT and implications for treatment of patients. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 1999;172:1485–1490.

15 Smith R, Verga M, McCarthy S, et al. Diagnosis of acute flank pain: value of unenhanced helical CT. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 1996;166:97–101.

16 Colistro R, Torreggiani W, Lyburn I, et al. Unenhanced helical CT in the investigation of acute flank pain. Clin Radiol. 2002;57:435–441.

17 Sourtzis S, Thibeau J, Damry N, et al. Radiologic investigation of renal colic: unenhanced helical CT compared with excretory urography. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 1999;172:1491–1494.

18 Hill M, Rich J, Mardiat J, et al. Sonography vs excretory urography in acute flank pain. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 1985;144:1235–1238.

19 Patlas M, Farkas A, Fisher D, et al. Ultrasound vs CT for the detection of ureteric stones in patients with renal colic. Br J Radiol. 2001;74:901–904.

20 Gorelik U, Ulish Y, Yagil Y. The use of standard imaging techniques and their diagnostic value in the workup of renal colic in the setting of intractable flank pain. Urology. 1996;47:635–642.

21 Mutgi A, Williams J, Nettleman M. Utility of the plain abdominal roentgenogram. Arch Intern Med. 1991;151:1589–1592.

22 Roth C, Bowyer B, Berquist T, et al. Utility of the plain abdominal radiography for diagnosing ureteral calculi. Ann Emerg Med. 1985;14:311–315.

23 Palma L, Stacul F, Bazzocchi M, et al. Ultrasonography and plain film versus intravenous urography in ureteric colic. Clin Radiol. 1993;47:333–336.

24 Perlmutter A, Miller L, Trimble LA, et al. Toradol, an NSAID used for renal colic, decreases renal perfusion and ureteral pressure in a canine model of unilateral ureteral obstruction. J Urol. 1993;149:926–930.

25 Lennon G, Bourke J, Ryan P, et al. Pharmacological options for the treatment of acute ureteric colic. Br J Urol. 1993;71:401–407.

26 Jasani NB, O’Conner RE, Bouzoukis JK. Comparison of hydromorphone and meperidine for ureteral colic. Acad Emerg Med. 1994;1:539–543.

27 Cordell W, Larson T, Lingeman J, et al. Indomethacin suppositories versus intravenously titrated morphine for the treatment of ureteral colic. Ann Emerg Med. 1994;23:262–269.

28 Labrecque M, Dostaler L, Rousselle R, et al. Efficacy of non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs in the treatment of acute renal colic. Arch Intern Med. 1994;154:1381–1387.

29 Lundstam SO, Leissner KH, Wåhlander LA, et al. Prostaglandin-synthetase inhibition with diclofenac sodium in treatment of renal colic: comparison with use of a narcotic analgesic. Lancet. 1982;1:1096–1097.

30 Larkin G, Peacock W, Pearl S, et al. Efficacy of ketorolac tromethamine versus meperidine in the ED treatment of acute renal colic. Am J Emerg Med. 1999;17:6–10.

31 Cordell W, Wright S, Wolfson A, et al. Comparison of intravenous ketorolac, meperidine, and both (balanced analgesia) for renal colic. Ann Emerg Med. 1996;28:151–158.

32 Dellabella M, Milanese G, Muzzonigro G. Efficacy of tamsulosin in the medical management of juxtavesical ureteral stones. J Urol. 2003;170:2202–2205.

33 Duquenne S, Hellel M, Godinas L, et al. Spasmolytics indication in renal colic: a literature review. Rev Med Liege. 2009;64:45–48.

34 Singh A, Alter H, Littlepage A. A systematic review of medical therapy to facilitate passage of ureteral calculi. Ann Emerg Med. 2007;50:552–563.

35 Dellabella M, Milanese G, Muzzonigro G. Randomized trial of the efficacy of tamsulosin, nifedipine and phloroglucinol in medical expulsive therapy for distal ureteral calculi. J Urol. 2005;174:167–172.

36 Yencilek F, Erturhan S, Canguven O, et al. Does tamsulosin change the management of proximally located ureteral stones? Urol Res. 2010;38:195–199.

37 Welk B, Teichman J. Pharmacological management of renal colic in the older patient. Drugs Aging. 2007;24:891–900.

38 Troxel S, Jones A, Magliola L, et al. Physiologic effect of nifedipine and tamsulosin on contractility of distal ureter. J Endourol. 2006;20:565–568.

39 Edna T, Hesselberg F. Acute ureteral colic and fluid intake. Scand J Urol Nephrol. 1983;17:175–178.