Chapter 64 Myasthenia Gravis
3 List and describe the differential diagnosis of bulbar weakness
Lambert-Eaton myasthenic syndrome (LEMS): LEMS presents in the opposite fashion of MG. Patients present with weakness that improves on repetitive stimulation of the muscle. Autoantibodies are directed presynaptically and prevent Ca++-mediated release of synaptic vesicles. LEMS is most often a paraneoplastic disorder.
Miller Fisher variant Guillain-Barré syndrome (GBS): Antibodies to GQ1b affect the bulbar musculature first resulting in the triad of ophthalmoplegia, ataxia, and areflexia. See Chapter 63 for description of classic GBS presentation.
Thyrotoxicosis: Presents with transient weakness and ocular findings. Hence thyroid function tests are part of the initial evaluation of any patient with suspected MG.
Botulism: Presents with blurred vision, midposition nonreactive pupils, dysphagia, and limb weakness.
Amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS): Though early stage ALS can have protean manifestations, key differences are the presence of upper motor neuron signs such as spasticity and hyperreflexia not seen in MG.
7 How should a patient in myasthenic crisis be evaluated?
With increasing muscle weakness it is important to assess respiratory muscle strength and identify impending respiratory failure. Tachypnea is often the first sign of impending respiratory failure. Important respiratory parameters that should be monitored include vital capacity (VC) and maximum inspiratory force (MIF). Because neither measurement has been shown to be superior, the two are usually analyzed in combination. In a patient with progressive muscle weakness, a MIF <20 cm H2O or VC <5 mL/kg indicates the need for elective intubation and mechanical ventilation. These measurements can often be difficult to obtain and are spurious in a patient with severe facial weakness, which can prevent a tight seal around the lips. Therefore surrogate measures of VC such as having the patient count out loud as high as he or she can in one breath may be useful (approximately 100 mL for each number counted slowly). Hypercarbia usually develops before hypoxia. Both are late signs of neuromuscular respiratory failure and should not be used as a decision for intubation in MG. After respiratory status has been stabilized, focus should be shifted to determining the underlying trigger for the exacerbation. Infections are a common trigger, often of pulmonary or urinary source, with further evaluation of other sources as clinical suspicion dictates. Great care should be taken to avoid medications that could worsen neuromuscular transmission. An extensive list of medications that aggravate MG can be found at http://www.myasthenia.org. The list should be reviewed for every patient with MG in your care. Key offenders are aminoglycosides and quinolones.
12 What is the prognosis for patients with MG?
Key Points Myasthenia Gravis
1. MG is an autoimmune disorder with antibodies directed against the postsynaptic acetylcholine receptors.
2. In a majority of cases MG preferentially affects ocular and bulbar musculature followed later by muscles of the trunk and limbs.
3. Myasthenic crisis is weakness resulting in respiratory failure best measured by respiratory rate and serial measurement of MIF and VC. Hypoxia and hypercarbia develop very late in myasthenic crisis and should not be used as intubation criteria.
4. Plasmapheresis and IVIG are the mainstays of treatment of severe myasthenic exacerbations. A careful evaluation for infection and review of all potentially harmful medications (an extensive list) should occur for every patient with exacerbation of MG.
1 Drachman D.B. Myasthenia gravis. N Engl J Med. 1994;330:1797–1810.
2 Gomez A.M., Van Den Broeck J., Vrolix K., et al. Antibody effector mechanisms in myasthenia gravis-pathogenesis at the neuromuscular junction. Autoimmunity. 2010;43:353–370.
3 Jani-Acsadi A., Lisak R.P. Myasthenic crisis: guidelines for prevention and treatment. J Neurol Sci. 2007;261:127–133.
4 Mao Z.F., Mo X.A., Qin C., et al. Course and prognosis of myasthenia gravis: a systematic review. Eur J Neurol. 2010;17:913–921.
5 Scherer K., Bedlack R., Simel D. Does this patient have myasthenia gravis? JAMA. 2005;293:1906–1914.