Mononuclear Phagocytes in Immune Defense

Published on 18/02/2015 by admin

Filed under Allergy and Immunology

Last modified 22/04/2025

Print this page

rate 1 star rate 2 star rate 3 star rate 4 star rate 5 star
Your rating: none, Average: 0 (0 votes)

This article have been viewed 4919 times

Chapter 7 Mononuclear Phagocytes in Immune Defense

Summary

Macrophages: The ‘big eaters’. Macrophages are endowed with a remarkable capacity to internalize material through phagocytosis.

Macrophages differentiate from circulating blood monocytes and are widely distributed throughout the body. Macrophages belong to the family of mononuclear phagocytes, which also comprise monocytes, osteoclasts, and dendritic cells. These cells share a common hematopoietic precursor that cannot differentiate into neutrophils. Phenotypically distinct populations of macrophages are present in each organ.

Macrophages are highly effective endocytic and phagocytic cells. Macrophages have a highly developed endocytic compartment that mediates the uptake of a wide range of stimuli and targets them for degradation in lysosomes.

Macrophages sample their environment through opsonic and non-opsonic receptors. Macrophages express a wide range of receptors that act as sensors of the physiological status of organs, including the presence of infection.

Clearance of apoptotic cells by macrophages produces anti-inflammatory signals. Macrophages produce IL-10 and TGF-β upon internalization of apoptotic cells.

Macrophages coordinate the inflammatory response. Recognition of necrotic cells and microbial compounds by macrophages initiates inflammation leading to the recruitment of neutrophils. Monocyte recruitment to sites of inflammation is promoted by activated neutrophils and there is a collaborative effort between macrophages and neutrophils to eliminate the triggering insult. Macrophages are actively involved in the resolution of the inflammatory reaction.

There are different pathways of macrophage activation. TH1 cytokines such as IFNγ enhance inflammation and anti-microbial activity. TH2 cytokines induce an alternate activation that promotes tissue repair. TGFβ, corticosteroids and IL-10 can induce an anti-inflammatory phenotype.

Macrophages: the ‘big eaters’

Macrophages are cells of hematopoietic origin widely distributed throughout lymphoid and non-lymphoid tissues. They are endowed with a remarkable capacity to internalize material through phagocytosis, which makes them key players in both homeostasis and immune defense. Macrophages clear approximately 2 × 1011 erythrocytes a day and are also implicated in the removal of cell debris and apoptotic cells, processes critical for normal development and physiology. The machinery mediating this homeostatic uptake also enables macrophages to recognize and internalize invading microorganisms, a process that facilitates clearance of infectious agents and elicits inflammation. Macrophages are highly heterogeneous and differentiate according to the environmental cues and physiological conditions present in tissues including the presence of microbes or cellular damage.

Macrophages differentiate from blood monocytes

Macrophages belong to the family of mononuclear phagocytes, which also comprise monocytes, osteoclasts, and dendritic cells. These cells share a common hematopoietic precursor that cannot differentiate into neutrophils or other cells of myeloid lineage. Monocytes circulate through the blood stream and are the precursors of macrophages in all tissues of the body, including secondary lymphoid organs even in the absence of an overt inflammatory stimulus. Monocytes may also develop into dendritic cells at sites of inflammation.

Monocytes are immune effector cells in their own right capable of detecting and internalizing pathogens and triggering inflammation. Recently, subpopulations of monocytes have been described in human and mouse blood. These subpopulations display differential expression of chemokine receptors and respond differently to stimulation indicating that they play distinct roles during inflammation with each subset implicated in either promotion or resolution of inflammation.

Within tissues the mononuclear phagocytes undergo maturation, adapt to their local microenvironment, and differentiate into various cell types (Fig. 7.1). Distinctive populations of resident macrophages are found in most tissues of the body; they differ in their life span, morphology, and phenotype, for example the microglial cells in the brain appear quite unlike mononuclear phagocytes in other tissues (Fig. 7.2). Resident cells have usually ceased to proliferate, but may remain as relatively long-lived cells, with low turnover, unlike neutrophils.

Macrophage populations have distinctive phenotypes

Some of the key features of resident macrophage populations in tissues are shown in Figure 7.w1. The study of the heterogeneity and distribution of mononuclear phagocytes has been made possible through the use of antibodies against differentiation markers. These markers can be located at the plasma membrane or endosomal compartments. In the mouse the F4/80 antigen and macrosialin (CD68) have proved useful in defining the distribution of mature macrophages in many (but not all) tissues. Differentiation antigens such as sialoadhesin, a lectin-like receptor for sialylated glycoconjugates, are particularly strongly present on populations of macrophages in lymphoid organs that do not express F4/80 or CD68. Macrophages expressing sialoadhesin are exposed to the blood and lymph and are thought to be involved in antigen delivery. In humans, the CD68 antigen, the human homolog of macrosialin, is widely expressed in macrophages while the F4/80 homolog EMR2 labels subsets of macrophages. Anatomical differences between mouse and human spleen correlate with different distribution of macrophage differentiation markers. The mannose receptor is expressed by macrophages in the red pulp of mouse spleen but is absent from these cells in human spleen.

Comparing the differentiation markers expressed by macrophages in tissues with those expressed by macrophages differentially stimulated in vitro, allows researchers to propose hypotheses regarding the role of different macrophage populations in health and disease. For instance, alternatively activated macrophages were first characterized in vitro by studying macrophages treated with IL-4 in culture; the markers identified in IL-4/IL-13 treated cells together with additional markers discovered in the case of parasite infection are being used to investigate the acquisition by macrophages of an alternative activation profile in tissues. Interestingly, macrophages with characteristics of alternative activation are being detected during allergic responses, nematode infection and during wound healing. Differences in activation markers between human and mouse macrophages need to be taken into consideration when translating results obtained with preclinical models into the clinical setting.

Some of the important stimuli that modulate macrophage phenotype are listed in Figure 7.w2 and some of their characteristic cell surface receptors in Figure 7.w3.

The tissue environment controls differentiation of resident macrophages

It is possible to reconstruct a constitutive migration pathway in which monocytes become endothelial-like and line vascular sinusoids, as in the liver (Kupffer cells, see Fig. 2.3), or penetrate between endothelial cells. They underlie endothelia or epithelia or enter the interstitial space or serosal cavities (Fig. 7.3). The molecular mechanisms of constitutive macrophage distribution and induced migration are beginning to be defined, and involve cellular adhesion molecules, cytokines, and growth factors, as well as chemokines and chemokine receptors.

Mature macrophages are themselves part of the stromal microenvironment in bone marrow. They associate with developing hematopoietic cells to perform poorly defined non-phagocytic trophic functions, as well as removing effete cells and erythroid nuclei. In bone, osteoclasts, highly specialized multinucleated cells of monocytic origin, mediate bone resorption and their deficency leads to osteopetrosis.

Secondary lymphoid organs contain several distinct types of macrophages. These macrophages have been better characterized in the mouse (Fig. 7.4) and subsets involved in the clearance of apoptotic lymphocytes (tingible body macrophages) or presentation of naive antigens to B cells (subcapsular sinus macrophages) have been identified. Anatomical differences between human and mouse spleen, such as the absence of a well defined marginal sinus, correlates with phenotypical differences in splenic macrophages (see Fig. 7.4)

Macrophages can act as antigen-presenting cells

Although macrophages are often regarded as sessile cells, they readily migrate to draining lymph nodes after an inflammatory stimulus and become arrested there. They are therefore absent from efferent lymph and do not, as a rule, re-enter the circulation.

Macrophages, like dendritic cells, have all the machinery required for antigen processing and presentation of exogenous peptides and endogenous peptides on MHC class II and class I, respectively. Cross-presentation, a process by which peptides of exogenous origin are presented on MHC class I, also takes place in macrophages. While dendritic cells are uniquely suited for stimulating naive T cells in secondary lymphoid organs, macrophages present antigen in the periphery to activated (already primed) T cells. This interaction makes macrophages important effector cells during adaptive immunity (Fig. 7.5). The specialization of dendritic cells for antigen presentation correlates with a reduced degradative capacity that facilitates the generation of MHC-peptide complexes.

Macrophages act as sentinels within the tissues

Macrophages react to a wide range of environmental influences that help to fulfill their role as sentinels of the innate immune system (Fig. 7.6). The presence of cells within tissues with the potential to initiate inflammation through the release of cytokines and chemokines and to cause tissue damage through the production of reactive oxygen species requires control systems capable of downmodulating macrophage activation. One of these systems involves the molecule CD200L, which is an inhibitory receptor expressed by myeloid cells. CD200L inhibitory signaling is triggered through interaction with CD200 expressed by non-hematopoietic cells as well as macrophages. The CD200–CD200L interaction is important for the control of macrophage activation by other cells present in tissues.

Phagocytosis and endocytosis

Large particles are internalized by phagocytosis

Phagocytosis involves the uptake of particulate material (>0.5 μm) after recognition by opsonic or non-opsonic receptors (see Fig 7.6), its engulfment through the generation of pseudopodia and the formation of phagosomes. Phagosomes follow a similar maturation process to endosomes through the fusion with components of the early and late endocytic compartments so that maturing phagosomes sequentially adopt characteristics of early and late endosomes; this process culminates in the fusion of phagosomes to lysosomes to form phagolysosomes (Fig. 7.7). Phagosomal maturation is accompanied by acidification of the lumen (from 6.1–6.5 in early phagosomes to 4.5 in phagolysosomes), which controls membrane traffic and has a direct effect on microbial growth. Other microbicidal mechanisms associated with phagosome maturation are the generation of reactive oxygen and nitrogen species and the presence of antimicrobial proteins and peptides.

Host cells control the phagocytic activity of macrophages by displaying the ‘don’t eat me’ signal CD47. CD47 engages a receptor in macrophages called SIRPα that through its immunoreceptor tyrosine-based inhibitory motif (ITIM) motif inhibits the uptake process. CD47 expression by tumor cells has been proposed as an immunosurveillance escape mechanism.

Macrophages sample their environment through opsonic and non-opsonic receptors

Macrophages are endowed with a wide range of receptors that act as sensors of the physiological status of organs, including the presence of infection. These receptors can be categorized as opsonic or non-opsonic depending on their capacity to interact directly with the stimuli or their need for a bridging molecule such as antibody or fragments of the complement component C3, which act as opsonins.

Opsonic receptors require antibody or complement to recognize the target

Bacteria opsonized by C3 fragments or antibody engage complement receptors (CR) or Fc receptors (FcR). CR-dependent phagocytosis is not an automatic process but requires additional stimulation such as inflammation. Monocytes and macrophages express a range of receptors (CR1, CR3, CR4) for C3 cleavage products that may become bound to pathogens, immune complexes or other complement activators. The role of CR3 role in regulated phagocytosis has been well studied, and the mechanism of CR3-mediated ingestion differs strikingly from that mediated by Fc receptors.

FcRs belong to the immunoglobulin superfamily (see Fig. 3.17). The best characterized FcR is CD64 (FcγRI), the high affinity receptor for IgG which signals through the common γ chain that contains an immunoreceptor tyrosine based activation motif (ITAM). The common γ chain is also used by some non-opsonic receptors that bind carbohydrates (see below) and it signals through the key kinase Syk. In humans other activating receptors for IgG are low affinity FcγRIIa (CD32) and FcγRIII (CD16), which require the recognition of immune complexes for inducing internalisation. IgG-opsonized material is readily internalized by macrophages and leads to the production of reactive oxygen species and cellular activation. The activating effect of ITAM-associated FcγRs is regulated by the presence of the inhibitory form of CD32 (FcγRIIb), which bears an ITIM.

The mechanism for ingestion of antibody-coated particles is distinct from that mediated by CR3 (Fig. 7.8). FcR-mediated uptake proceeds by a zipper-like process where sequential attachment between receptors and ligands guides pseudopod flow around the circumference of the particle. In contrast, CR3 contact sites are discontinuous for complement-coated particles which ‘sink’ into the macrophage cytoplasm. Small GTPases play distinct roles in actin cytoskeleton engagement by each receptor-mediated process.

The best characterized non-opsonic receptors are the Toll-like receptors (TLRs)

Non-opsonic receptors or pattern recognition receptors (PRRs) recognize unusual features characteristic of damaged, malfunctioning or infected tissues and their general characteristics are described in Chapter 6.

TLRs are membrane glycoproteins with an extracellular region responsible for ligand binding and a cytoplasmic domain responsible for triggering an intracellular signaling cascade. They can form hetero- or homo-dimers with each other or complex with other receptors in order to detect a wide range of microbial components. They are located at the cell surface or within endosomes. In humans there are 10 of these receptors and together they are able to recognize a wide range of microbes including Gram-positive bacteria and mycobacteria (see Fig. 6.20). For example, TLR4 detects Gram-negative bacteria because of its ability to recognize endotoxin. It then signals to the cell using similar systems to those mediated by IL-1 (Fig. 7.9). It can also activate the macrophage by a second pathway that is initiated by Trif, which leads to a secondary production of IFNβ and autocrine activation of additional macrophage genes.

CD14 is a GPI-linked membrane protein that facilitates the recognition of LPS by TLR4 so that it increases LPS sensitivity (see Fig. 7.9). Recently CD14 has also been shown to facilitate recognition of ligands by TLR2 and TLR3, which opens the possibility of CD14 acting as a multifunctional adaptor protein.

TLR4 also recognizes degraded extracellular matrix and the nuclear protein high mobility group 1 protein (HMGB1) which can be released by necrotic cells, an example of damage-associated molecules.image

TLRs activate macrophages through several different pathways

The key adaptor molecules that mediate TLR-signalling are MyD88 (Fig. 7.w4) and Trif, both of which interact with the TIR cytoplasmic domain of TLRs. Most TLRs signal either through MyD88 or Trif, but TLR4 is unique in its ability to signal through both. The range of responses elicited by TLRs in macrophages is vast and includes the activation of the NFκB signaling pathway (see Fig. 7.w4) and MAP kinases, responsible for the production of proinflammatory cytokines and induction of microbicidal mechanisms. Signaling through the IL-1 and IL-18 receptors is also mediated by MyD88.

The Trif pathway induces IRF transcription factors that will lead to the production of type 1 interferons, which can then stimulate the macrophage to cause a second, delayed wave of gene activation (Fig. 7.w5).

Lectin and scavenger receptors are non-opsonic receptors that recognize carbohydrates and modified proteins directly

In the plasma membrane, members of the scavenger receptor and lectin families mediate the recognition of modified lipoproteins and carbohydrates. Most of these receptors have signaling and internalisation motifs in their cytoplasmic region and are capable of mediating endocytosis and phagocytosis in isolation but their role is largely confined to the fine-tuning of TLR signaling.

Scavenger receptors (SR) (Fig. 7.10) such as SR-A are involved in LPS clearance, and may serve to downregulate responses induced via the TLR4-CD14 pathway (see Fig. 7.9) and therefore limit the systemic release of TNFα and resultant septic shock. SR-A has also been involved in bacterial uptake. Another member of this family, CD36, collaborates with TLR2 in the recognition of S. aureus and M. tuberculosis.

Dectin-1 (Fig. 7.11), a lectin with a single lectin-like domain and an intracellular ITAM-like motif, is highly specific for the fungi-derived compound β-glucan (Fig. 7.12). Dectin-1-mediated effects are largely mediated by the kinase, Syk and Card 9 Dectin-1 mediates phagocytosis of β-glucan particles and synergizes with TLRs to boost immune responses. It also has a role in Th cell differentiation and β-glucan treated dendritic cells promote the development of TH17 cells. Humans deficient in dectin-1 are more susceptible to mucosal candidiasis.

The mannose receptor (MR) may play a unique role in tissue homeostasis as well as host defense (see Fig. 7.11). Endogenous ligands include lysosomal hydrolases and myeloperoxidase. The N terminal cysteine-rich domain of the MR is a distinct lectin for sulfated glycoconjugates highly expressed in secondary lymphoid organs. The cysteine-rich domain also contributes to the clearance of hormones such as lutropin. MR can internalize collagen, which is recognized through the fibronectin type II domain and recent evidence suggests that MR promotes TH2 responses, which correlates with its capacity to interact with multiple glycosylated allergens and secreted helminth products.

DC-SIGN, another mannose-binding C-type lectin (see Fig. 7.11), is expressed on some macrophages. It forms tetramers and lacks obvious signaling motifs at its cytoplasmic region. It has been implicated in interactions between APCs and T cells and in microbial recognition. DC-SIGN has been shown to modulate TLR signaling to promote transcription of various cytokine genes, particularly IL-10 and IL-8.

Other lectin receptors are langerin and dectin-2, which have mannose specificity, and Mincle, which recognizes ligands expressed by necrotic cells in addition to fungal pathogens. Dectin-2 and Mincle (see Fig. 7.11) signal through the common γ-chain that also mediates signaling by the FcR CD64.

DCIR is the only single lectin receptor bearing an ITIM. Animals deficient in DCIR have altered DC numbers and increased susceptibility to autoimmune diseases.

Cytosolic receptors recognize intracellular pathogens

Cytosolic receptors include two families of molecules that recognize intracellular bacteria and viruses:

Some of the NLRs form part of a multi-protein complex, the inflammasome, which is assembled in the cytoplasm and triggers inflammatory cell death (pyroptosis) of the infected cell. Pyroptosis causes release of cell contents and induces inflammation. Caspase I also processes the precursors of IL-1 and IL-18 to produce the active inflammatory cytokines. The composition of the inflammasome varies depending on the initiating stimulus as the NLRs responsible for the formation of the inflammasome complex are activated by different agents.

The two RLH proteins RIG-1 and MDA5 both recognize RNA viruses, but they have different specificity. For example RIG-1 is important in recognition of influenza virus, whereas MDA5 recognizes polio virus. Both, RIG-1 and MDA-5 are involved in the recognition of Dengue virus. There are also cytosolic receptors able to recognize DNA.

Mechanism of action of NLRs

All NLR proteins have a similar domain structure:

Two key members of the NLR family are NOD-1 and NOD-2, which recognize fragments of peptidoglycan generated during the division of Gram-negative and Gram-positive bacteria (Fig. 7.w6). Detection of peptidoglycan through NOD receptors leads to the recruitment of the adaptor RICK, activation of NFkB and promotion of inflammation (see Fig. 7-w6).

NOD-1 polymorphisms are associated with the development of atopic eczema, asthma, and increased serum IgE concentrations. Three common mutations of amino acid residues near or within the NOD-2 LRR region are genetic risk factors for the development of Crohn’s disease. NOD-2 deficiency leads to increased susceptibility to bacterial infection via the oral route, implying that it may be required for expression of antimicrobial peptides.

Other NLR proteins such as NLRP3, NLRP1 and IPAF, are components of multiprotein complexes called inflammasomes that lead to the activation of inflammatory caspases. Inflammatory caspases mediate the processing of pro-IL-1β and pro-IL-18 into their active counterparts and can lead to inflammation (see Fig. 7.13). Inflammatory caspases also lead to the induction of inflammatory cell death or pyroptosis in which the affected cell dies alerting the immune system of the presence of DAMPs by releasing its contents.

In inflammasomes NLR proteins act as scaffold proteins that trigger caspase activation. The assembly of inflammasomes can be induced by pathogens as well as by host derived molecules, signs of metabolic stress and particles such as uric acid crystals and asbestos.

Functions of phagocytic cells

Clearance of apoptotic cells by macrophages produces anti-inflammatory signals

To maintain appropriate cell numbers during development, normal tissue homeostasis and pathological responses, cells die naturally by apoptosis, which involves activation of non-inflammatory caspases.

Cellular and biochemical pathways resulting in apoptosis are conserved in evolution and apoptotic cells are rapidly and efficiently cleared by macrophages (Fig. 7.14), although they can also be engulfed by non-professional phagocytes. The appearance of phosphatidylserine (PS) in the outer leaflet of the plasma membrane is characteristic of apoptotic cells. PS recognition by PS-binding proteins stimulates the uptake of apoptotic cells and the production of anti-inflammatory mediators, especially TGFβ, which inhibit production of proinflammatory chemokines and cytokines.

There is redundancy in the receptors involved in apoptotic cell recognition. These include a range of scavenger receptors (SR-AI, CD36), T-cell immunoglobulin receptors (Tim) 3 and 4 and stabilin-2, and the complement component C1q which directly recognize the ‘eat-me’ signals displayed by the apoptotic cells.

Inefficient clearance of apoptotic cells may also contribute to autoimmune disorders such as systemic lupus erythematosus, and may explain their association with genetic deficiencies of complement components.

Macrophages coordinate the inflammatory response

Recognition of necrotic cells and microbial compounds by macrophages initiates inflammation

In contrast to the recognition of apoptotic cells, uptake of microbial products and necrotic cells by resident macrophages promotes cellular activation leading to the production of secreted molecules (Fig. 7.15). Recognition of PAMPS and molecules from damaged cells through PRRs leads to the activation of the NFκB pathway (see Fig. 7.w4image) and the production of cytokines and chemokines. The activation of cytosolic phospholipase A2 causes the release of arachidonic acid, the precursor of prostaglandins and leukotrienes, through the actions of the cycloxygenase and lipoxygenase pathways, respectively. Proinflammatory prostaglandins control blood flow and vascular dilation and permeability at sites of inflammation. Trafficking of lymphocytes and neutrophils into tissues is induced by leukotriene-B4 (see Figs. 6.17 & 6.18).

Resident macrophages recruit neutrophils to inflammatory sites

Neutrophils are the first cells recruited to the site of inflammation and play a key role in elimination of the inflammatory insult (Fig. 7.16). Appropriate neutrophil recruitment is essential for successful resolution of the inflammatory response as deficiencies in the clearance of the triggering stimuli will result in chronic inflammation and tissue dysfunction (Fig. 7.17). Although macrophages and neutrophils share the capacity to mediate phagocytosis and intracellular killing, there are key differences between them:

Activated tissue macrophages produce chemokines CXCL5 and CXCL8 that promote neutrophil recruitment (see Fig. 7.16) and neutrophil extravasation is also promoted through proteolytic cleavage of chemokines by metalloproteases (MMP8 and MMP9), which enhance their chemotactic activity. The primary role of neutrophils in a wound is to eliminate invading pathogens. To aid this goal recruited neutrophils that fail to encounter bacteria in a short period of time will soon release their microbicidal compounds leading to the liquefaction of tissue and the formation of pus. Tissue destruction facilitates bacterial clearance by eliminating collagen fibrils that limit cellular movement.

Macrophages and neutrophils have complementary microbicidal actions

Macrophages and neutrophils complement each other in the clearance of pathogens. Following extravasation neutrophils release preformed proteins stored in granules, in three phases:

The defensins are a group of highly cationic polypeptides which contribute to antibacterial activities. The defensins:

The primary granules also contain BPI (LPS-binding bactericidal permeability increasing protein) and serprocidins that include 3 serine proteases which in addition to their microbicidal activity, cause tissue destruction.

Cytosolic and nuclear components of neutrophils can also contribute to antimicrobial activity – chromatin from neutrophils forms extracellular nets that associate with proteases from the azurophil granules.

Phagocytes kill pathogens with reactive oxygen and nitrogen intermediates

Phagocytes mediate microbial killing through a wide range of mechanisms including acidification of the phagosome, through the formation of a H+ ion gradient by V-ATPase. Acidification has direct microbicidal activity and facilitates the action of enzymes that have acidic pH optima. Additionally the H+ ion gradient facilitates the extrusion of nutrients needed by the microbes.

Macrophages and neutrophils can also kill pathogens by secreting highly toxic reactive oxygen intermediates (ROIs) and reactive nitrogen intermediates (RNIs) into the phagosome (see Fig. 7.18). The NOX2 NADPH oxidase located at the phagosomal membrane generates ROIs and this property is most prominent in neutrophils. This oxidase transfers electrons from cytosolic NADPH to molecular oxygen releasing O2 into the lumen. ROIs can interact with macromolecules (for instance through sulfur groups) rendering them inactive. Patients with chronic granulomatous disease lacking essential oxidase components suffer from repeated bacterial infections.

One major difference between resting and activated macrophages is the ability to generate hydrogen peroxide (H2O2), and other metabolites generated by the respiratory burst. Whereas neutrophils are readily endowed with microbicidal properties, macrophages require activation through the engagement of activating PRRs, reaching maximal microbicidal activity in the presence of IFNγ, which triggers classical activation (see below). Failure of macrophage activation in AIDS contributes to opportunistic pathogen infections and persistence of HIV, as well as reactivation of latent tuberculosis.

Macrophages can also be activated by IFNγ to express high levels of inducible nitric oxide synthase (i-NOS, NOS2), which catalyzes the production of nitric oxide (NO) from arginine (Fig. 7.19). ROIs and RNIs can interact to produce peroxynitrites and these reactive species all act within the phagosome to cause toxic effects on intraphagosomal pathogens; they interact with thiols, metal centers and tyrosines, damaging nucleic acids and converting lipids through oxidative damage. In this way bacterial metabolism and replication are impaired.

Another mechanism that limits bacterial growth involves the sequestration of key nutrients by lactoferrin (Fe2+) or NRAMP1, which extrudes Fe2+, Zn2+ and Mn2+ from the lumen. Additionally, phagosomes contain endopeptidases, exopeptidases, and hydrolases, which break down the pathogens. The proteases are delivered by different granules at different stages during the maturation of the phagosome.

Functions of secreted molecules

Following encounters with microorganisms and antigens, resident macrophages can enhance their transcription and translation of a wide range of gene products, including secreted molecules, which often act locally close to the cell surface.

Secretory products include:

Lysozyme acts directly on the bacterial cell-wall proteoglycans, present especially in the exposed cell wall of Gram-positive bacteria (Fig.7.w7). The cell walls of Gram-negative bacteria may also become exposed to lysozyme if they have been damaged by complement membrane attack complexes. Lysozyme is constitutively produced by macrophages.

Cytotoxic products and powerful neutral proteinases such as elastase, collagenase, and urokinase (generating plasmin) (Fig.7.w8) are able to induce tissue injury and contribute to destructive chronic inflammation in joints and lung. Monocyte-derived procoagulant/tissue factor can also induce vascular occlusion and tissue damage.

In addition to their local actions, IL-6 and IL-1 act as circulating mediators of the acute phase response. Distant targets of these macrophage-derived cytokines include thermoregulatory centers in the central nervous system, muscle and fat stores, liver and the neuroendocrine system.

Resolution of inflammation by macrophages is an active process

Complete removal of the inflammatory trigger initiates the resolution of inflammation, in which neutrophil infiltration stops and apoptotic neutrophils are phagocytozed. A key event in this process is ‘lipid mediator class-switch’ in which prostaglandin and leukotriene synthesis is replaced by the synthesis of lipoxins, resolvins and protectins (see Fig. 7.16). Intriguingly, the signaling pathways leading to the proinflammatory prostaglandins E2 and D2, synthesized early during inflammation, also lead to the transcription of the enzyme responsible for lipoxin synthesis. Lipoxin synthesis by neutrophils occurs through their interaction with platelets and epithelial cells that provide metabolic precursors through a process called transcellular biosynthesis. In the case of macrophages, lipoxin synthesis is triggered by uptake of apoptotic cells. Lipoxin A4 reduces neutrophil activity, increases the migration of monocytes, favors uptake of apoptotic neutrophils and inhibits the synthesis of CXCL8. Resolvin E1 and protectin D1 increase the expression of CXCR5 on the surface of apoptotic neutrophils which facilitates clearance of CXCL3 and CXCL5 (neutrophil chemoattractants) from the inflammatory site. Apoptotic neutrophils produce ‘find me’ signals (e.g. lysophosphatidylcholine) that attract macrophages. Uptake of these neutrophils by macrophages inhibits production of IL-23, a cytokine involved in promoting granulopoiesis. As described above, recognition of apoptotic cells by macrophages also leads to the production of the anti-inflammatory cytokines IL-10 and TGFβ that together with factors such as vascular endothelial growth factor promote tissue repair.

Different pathways of macrophage activation

Previous sections have hinted at the capacity of macrophages to adapt to their surroundings (i.e. macrophages in different anatomical compartments display distinct phenotypes and resident macrophages have lower microbicidal activity compared to recruited macrophages, even after activation). Study of the phenotype of macrophages exposed in culture to different combinations of cytokines further illustrated the plasticity of these cells. Broadly, macrophages can follow classical (M1) or alternative (M2) activation profiles though it is possible to encounter intermediate phenotypes:

Major attempts are being made to correlate the phenotypes observed in vitro with patterns of differentiation in vivo through the analysis of signature markers, some of them having been identified during parasite infection in mice (Fig. 7.21). Classical activation appears to be consistent with the role of macrophages as effector cells during the course of cell-mediated immune responses where IFNγ produced by TH1 T cells will enable the elimination of intracellular pathogens by macrophages (see above). Additionally M1 macrophages promote TH1 responses by producing IL-12, and secreting CXCL9 and CXCL10 which selectively recruit TH1 T cells.

Macrophages treated with IL-4 and IL-13 have a more developed endocytic compartment, produce reduced levels of proinflammatory cytokines and IL-12, increased levels of IL-10 and the decoy receptor IL1RA and can recruit Tregs and TH2 cells, eosinophils and basophils through the production of CCL17, CCL22 and CCL24, thereby amplifying TH2-type responses. M2 macrophages are less efficient in producing ROIs and RNIs. In these cells arginine is processed into ornithine and polyamines through activation of arginase. Arginase activity has been proposed as a way of controlling T cell activation (see Fig. 7.19).

In the absence of T cells, other cells at the site of injury collaborate to modulate the phenotype of macrophages. For example, natural killer cells activated by TNF-α and IL-12 produced by macrophages will synthesize IFNγ and under certain conditions, mast cells or early recruited eosinophils will produce IL-4 at sites of inflammation.

While the damaging effects of unregulated classical activation are widely illustrated and mediate the pathology of autoimmune diseases, examples of M2-like activation under selective pathological processes have also been described. For example, chronic exposure to LPS, leads to a state of tolerance that has been associated with immunosuppression during sepsis and is considered a state of M2 activation.

There are numerous reports of a role for M2 in parasitic disease models where they exert a regulatory, protective role probably due to their capacity to promote tissue repair. Interestingly, some microbes (e.g. Francisella tularensis) exploit the reduced microbicidal activity of M2 macrophages and alter the macrophage activation profile towards this path in order to minimize bacterial killing. Tumor-associated macrophages have also been shown to often display a M2-like phenotype, which promotes tumor survival through their capacity to produce IL-10 and angiogenic mediators.

The macrophage has so many functions in normal physiology and immune defense that it is not surprising that macrophage phenotypes vary both with location in the tissues and in response to cytokines produced in different types of inflammation.

Critical thinking: The role of macrophages in toxic shock syndrome (see p. 435 for explanations)

In an experimental model of septic shock, mice are infected systemically with bacille Calmette–Guérin (BCG), a non-lethal vaccine strain of mycobacteria. After 12 days, the mice are challenged intraperitoneally with graded doses of lipopolysaccharide (LPS). Blood samples are taken at 2 hours and the clinical condition of the mice is monitored for up to 24 hours. Experiments are terminated earlier if mice show severe signs of distress.

Further reading – reviews

Allen J., Wynn T. Evolution of TH2 immunity: a rapid repair response to tissue destructive pathogens. PLOS Pathogens. 2011;7:e1002003.

Auffray C., Sieweke M.H., Geissmann F. Blood monocytes: development, heterogeneity, and relationship with dendritic cells. Annu Rev Immunol. 2009;27:669–692.

Bergsbaken T., Fink S.L., Cookson B.T. Pyroptosis: host cell death and inflammation. Nat Rev Microbiol. 2009;7:99–109.

Biswas S.K., Lopez-Collazo E. Endotoxin tolerance: new mechanisms, molecules and clinical significance. Trends Immunol. 2009;30:475–487.

Biswas S.K., Mantovani A. Macrophage plasticity and interaction with lymphocyte subsets: cancer as a paradigm. Nat Immunol. 2010;11:889–896.

Burdette D.L, Monroe K.M, Sotelo-Troha K., et al. STING is a direct innate immune sensor of cyclic di-GMP. Nature. 2011;478:515–518.

Elliott M.R., Ravichandran K.S. Clearance of apoptotic cells: implications in health and disease. J Cell Biol. 2010;189:1059–1070.

Flannagan R.S., Cosio G., Grinstein S. Antimicrobial mechanisms of phagocytes and bacterial evasion strategies. Nat Rev Microbiol. 2009;7:355–366.

Geijtenbeek T.B., Gringhuis S.I. Signalling through C-type lectin receptors: shaping immune responses. Nat Rev Immunol. 2009;9:465–479.

Geissmann F., Gordon S., Hume D.A., et al. Unravelling mononuclear phagocyte heterogeneity. Nat Rev Immunol. 2010;10:453–460.

Geissmann F., Manz M.G., Jung S., et al. Development of monocytes, macrophages, and dendritic cells. Science. 2010;327:656–661.

Gordon S., Martinez F.O. Alternative activation of macrophages: mechanism and functions. Immunity. 2010;32:593–604.

Hamilton J.A. Colony-stimulating factors in inflammation and autoimmunity. Nat Rev Immunol. 2008;8:533–544.

Hampton M.B., Kettle A.J., Winterbourn C.C. Inside the neutrophil phagosome: oxidants, myeloperoxidase, and bacterial killing. Blood. 1998;92:3007–3017.

Hornung V., Latz E. Intracellular DNA recognition. Nat Rev Immunol. 2010;10:123–130.

Kerrigan A., Brown G.D. Syk-coupled C-type lectins in immunity. Trends Immunol. 2011;32:151–156.

Lawrence T., Gilroy D.W. Chronic inflammation: a failure of resolution? Int J Exp Pathol. 2007;88:85–94.

Levine B., Mizushima N., Virgin H.W. Autophagy in immunity and inflammation. Nature. 2011;469:323–335.

Martinez F.O., Helming L., Gordon S. Alternative activation of macrophages: an immunologic functional perspective. Annu Rev Immunol. 2009;27:451–483.

Mosser D.M., Edwards J.P. Exploring the full spectrum of macrophage activation. Nat Rev Immunol. 2008;8:958–969.

Nathan C. Neutrophils and immunity: challenges and opportunities. Nat Rev Immunol. 2006;6:173–182.

Nathan C. Ding A. Nonresolving inflammation. Cell. 2010;140:871–882.

Nguyen K.D., Qiu Y., Cui X., et al. Alternatively activated macrophages produce catecholamines to sustain adaptive thermogenesis. Nature. 2011;480:104–109.

Olefsky J.M., Glass C.K. Macrophages, inflammation, and insulin resistance. Annu Rev Physiol. 2010;72:219–246.

O’Neill L.A., Bowie A.G. The family of five: TIR-domain-containing adaptors in Toll-like receptor signalling. Nat Rev Immunol. 2007;7:353–364.

O’Neill L.A., Bowie A.G. Sensing and signaling in antiviral innate immunity. Curr Biol. 2010;20:R328–R333.

Peiser L., Mukhopadhyay S., Gordon S. Scavenger receptors in innate immunity. Curr Opin Immunol. 2002;14:123–128.

Ray K., Marteyn B., Sansonetti P.J., Tang C.M. Life on the inside: the intracellular lifestyle of cytosolic bacteria. Nat Rev Microbiol. 2009;7:333–340.

Robinson M.J., Sancho D., Slack E.C., et al. Myeloid C-type lectins in innate immunity. Nat Immunol. 2006;7:1258–1265.

Schroder K. Tschopp J. The inflammasomes. Cell. 2010;140:821–832.

Serhan C.N., Savill J. Resolution of inflammation: the beginning programs the end. Nat Immunol. 2005;6:1191–1197.

Serhan C.N., Yacoubian S., Yang R. Anti-inflammatory and proresolving lipid mediators. Annu Rev Pathol. 2008;3:279–312.

Soehnlein O., Lindbom L. Phagocyte partnership during the onset and resolution of inflammation. Nat Rev Immunol. 2010;10:427–439.

Soehnlein O., Lindbom L., Weber C. Mechanisms underlying neutrophil-mediated monocyte recruitment. Blood. 2009;114:4613–4623.

Taylor P.R., Gordon S., Martinez-Pomares L. The mannose receptor: linking homeostasis and immunity through sugar recognition. Trends Immunol. 2005;26:104–110.

Taylor P.R., Martinez-Pomares L., Stacey M., et al. Macrophage receptors and immune recognition. Annu Rev Immunol. 2005;23:901–944.

Vieira O.V., Botelho R.J., Grinstein S. Phagosome maturation: aging gracefully. Biochem J. 2002;366:689–704.

Woodward J.J., Iavarone A.T., Portnoy D.A. c-di-AMP secreted by intracellular Listeria monocytogenes activates a host type I interferon response. Science. 2010;328:1703–1705.

Selected references

Emara M., Royer P.J., Abbas Z., et al. Recognition of the major cat allergen Fel d 1 through the cysteine-rich domain of the mannose receptor determines its allergenicity. J Biol Chem. 2011;286:13033–13040.

Ferwerda B., Ferwerda G., Plantinga T.S., et al. Human dectin-1 deficiency and mucocutaneous fungal infections. N Engl J Med. 2009;361:1760–1767.

Heinsbroek S.E., Taylor P.R., Martinez F.O., et al. Stage-specific sampling by pattern recognition receptors during Candida albicans phagocytosis. PLoS Pathog. 2008;4:e1000218.

Krausgruber T., Blazek K., Smallie T., et al. IRF5 promotes inflammatory macrophage polarization and TH1-TH17 responses. Nat Immunol. 2011;12:231–238.

LeibundGut-Landmann S., Gross O., et al. Syk- and CARD9-dependent coupling of innate immunity to the induction of T helper cells that produce interleukin 17. Nat Immunol. 2007;8:630–638.

Liu Y., Stewart K.N., Bishop E., et al. Unique expression of suppressor of cytokine signaling 3 is essential for classical macrophage activation in rodents in vitro and in vivo. J Immunol. 2008;180:6270–6278.

Pesce J.T., Ramalingam T.R., Mentink-Kane M.M., et al. Arginase-1-expressing macrophages suppress Th2 cytokine-driven inflammation and fibrosis. PLoS Pathog. 2009;5:e1000371.

Royer P.J., Emara M., Yang C., et al. The mannose receptor mediates the uptake of diverse native allergens by dendritic cells and determines allergen-induced T cell polarization through modulation of IDO activity. J Immunol. 2010;185:1522–1531.

Satoh T., Takeuchi O., Vandenbon A., et al. The Jmjd3-Irf4 axis regulates M2 macrophage polarization and host responses against helminth infection. Nat Immunol. 2010;11:936–944.

Smith A.M., Rahman F.Z., Hayee B., et al. Disordered macrophage cytokine secretion underlies impaired acute inflammation and bacterial clearance in Crohn’s disease. J Exp Med. 2009;206:1883–1897.