Minimal Access Skull Base Approaches

Published on 13/03/2015 by admin

Filed under Neurosurgery

Last modified 22/04/2025

Print this page

rate 1 star rate 2 star rate 3 star rate 4 star rate 5 star
Your rating: none, Average: 0 (0 votes)

This article have been viewed 4315 times

Chapter E44 Minimal Access Skull Base Approaches

The skull base can be explored through two opposing approaches, which represent the two sides of the same coin: the intracranial approach, more familiar to neurosurgeons, and the extracranial approach, more familiar to ear, nose, and throat (ENT) surgeons and head and neck surgeons.

This chapter aims to provide a comprehensive discussion of endoscopic approaches to skull base lesions and the basis for an integrated understanding. The text includes detailed discussion about operative approaches and complication avoidance. Recently, early outcome data concerning the management of meningiomas, craniopharyngiomas, and chordomas through the endonasal route became available to guide decision making, although a consensus is far from being achieved. However, the continuous structured evolution of these techniques anticipates wider surgical series and longer follow-up times. The cross-pollination between subspecialties encourages the use of the endoscope during transcranial approaches, and this chapter will also summarize the current status of “pure” endoscopic supraorbital and retrosigmoid approaches.

Endoscopic Endonasal Approaches

Historical Background

Since the 1980s, several ENT surgeons pioneered the functional endoscopic sinus surgery (FESS),15 thus encouraging the “pure” endoscopic endonasal approach to the sella,6 performed first by Jankowski;7 then Jho and Carrau extended this technique,810 followed by other teams.1114 These experiences supported a continued structured evolution of the endoscopic technique: new skills have been transferred across subspecialties, new instruments have been designed,1518 new image-guidance systems have been fashioned,1924 and new surgical corridors have been defined, thus disclosing the way to the pure endoscopic approach to lesions affecting the skull base, from the frontal sinus to the C2 body.14,2528 The shift toward minimally invasive procedures represents the evolution of previous views: Ketcham’s concept of craniofacial resection29 evolved in the concept of “endoscopic craniofacial resection,”30 and Apuzzo’s inspired guess of using the endoscope in transcranial surgery31 has been translated in Kassam’s paradigm of “360 degree surgery,” which suggests the use of an endoport to unlock intracranial lesions.32

Classification

The sphenoid sinus is in the center of the skull base and the starting point for many extended endonasal approaches (Table E44.1) because critical anatomical structures, such as the internal carotid artery and the optic nerve, are identified here and then followed to other areas.14,2527,3336 The midline ventral skull base can be exposed from the frontal sinus to the body of C2 through specific modules: transcribriform, transtuberculum, transclival, and transodontoid25,37,38 (Fig. E44.1). Depending on the lesion extension along the sagittal plane,14,26,28 contiguous modules can be combined, and the lateral boundaries of each module are dictated by critical neurovascular structures. Lesions originating in or extending to paramedian areas, such as the cavernous sinus, the lateral recess of the sphenoid sinus, and the pterygopalatine fossa, can be approached through a transethmoid transantral transpterygoid route,3942 and several paramedian modules have been developed to improve the endonasal exposure of the orbit, the petrous apex, the infratemporal fossa, and the jugular foramen.27,30,4345

TABLE E44.1 Pure Endoscopic Approaches to the Skull Base

Endoscopic Approach Surgical Target
Endoscopic Endonasal Approaches
Midline Approaches
Transcribriform Cribriform plate
Transtuberculum transplanum Suprasellar area
Third ventricle
Standard transsphenoidal Sellar, suprasellar, and parasellar areas
Transclival Clivus
Interpeduncular and prepontine areas
Prepontine area
Transodontoid Craniovertebral junction
Odontoid
Superior cervical spine (C2 body)
Paramedian Approaches
Supraorbital and transorbital Orbital roof
Medial intraconal space
Transmaxillary transpterygoid Pterygopalatine fossa
Lateral recess of the sphenoid sinus
Lateral compartment of the cavernous sinus
Meckel’s cave
Infratemporal fossa
Medial aspect of the petrous apex
Jugular foramen
Endoscopic Transcranial Approaches
Supraorbital Anterior skull base
Middle skull base
Retrosigmoid Cerebellopontine angle

Imaging Techniques

Patients are studied with both magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and computed tomography (CT), which are complementary in delineating the individual anatomy of patients harboring skull base lesions, thus optimizing patient selection and operative procedure.35,46,47

High-resolution CT scan, with coronal and sagittal reconstruction, including both soft tissue and bone algorithms, is performed perpendicular to the hard palate. Depending on the specific module, the following points are assessed:

Preoperative CT angiography is used for intraoperative image guidance.

MRI is performed in the three planes with 3-mm sections and contrast enhancement and addresses the following points:

If sinusitis is identified, an intradural approach should not be undertaken until the infection has cleared.

Magnetic resonance angiography better defines the internal carotid artery (ICA) and other vascular structures, and digital subtraction angiography delineates the vascular supply and is not routinely performed. The latter is mainly used when an ICA occlusion test is deemed opportune.

Three-dimensional reconstruction techniques and measurement software are used routinely to estimate the osteodural window, trajectory, and reconstructive requirements and, therefore, to adapt the modular exposure and work out an optimal vascularized flap, when necessary.

Surgical Technique49

Perioperative antibiotic prophylaxis with a broad-spectrum cephalosporin50 is administered half an hour before surgery and continued for 5 days. We do not usually insert any lumbar drainage. Neurophysiological monitoring of brain and nerve function allows detection of cerebral ischemia and prevention of cranial nerve injury. An optimal anesthesia and analgesia combination51 contributes to a dry field, will improve surgical precision, and can reduce complications and frustration during the surgical procedure.

The head is fixed by mean of a circumferential band-aid in the standard approach to the sellar region. The head is fixed in a three-point Mayfield-Kees holder in a neutral position and slightly extended or flexed for transcribriform and transclival modules, respectively. The thorax is elevated about 10 degrees and the height of the bed is adapted to the surgeon’s height. The endoscopic equipment, the neuronavigator, and the Doppler probe are checked and the monitor is positioned along the line of vision of the surgeon, who stands at the patient’s right side; the surgeon’s assistant stands on the left side and the nurse is positioned at the patient’s legs.

Cotton pledgets soaked in diluted (1:1) povidone-iodine solution are gently slipped into the nasal cavities and the nose and upper lip are disinfected.

The procedure is performed with a rigid 0-degree endoscope, 18 cm in length, 4 mm in diameter (Karl Storz & Co., Tuttlingen, Germany), without any working channel and inserted in an irrigation shaft to keep the lens clean. A two-nostrils four-hands technique14,26,27,52,53 is recommended, with the endoscope used freehand during the whole procedure; it is held by the surgeon’s nondominant hand and, after the anterior sphenoidotomy, by the surgeon’s assistant. A 30-degree or 45-degree angled scope increases the angle of view when a more lateral view is needed, quite often in the intradural phase of the procedure.

Standard Approach

The surgical corridor between the middle turbinate and the nasal septum is enlarged by pushing the middle turbinate laterally, after topical decongestion with cotton pledgets soaked with proper anesthetics. The endoscope is moved, parallel to the nasal floor, toward the choana and angled up along the sphenoethmoid recess. After anterior sphenoidotomy, the identification of the anatomical landmarks54 over the posterior wall of the sphenoid guide the opening of the sellar floor. Dura opening is tailored to the lesion extension.

Microadenomas can be removed en bloc or piecemeal, depending on their consistency and the presence of a pseudocapsule.55 Intra- and suprasellar macroadenomas are removed systematically, starting from the bottom of the sella, because early descent of the stretched suprasellar cistern may hide tumor remnants.52 Tumor extension in the medial compartment of the cavernous sinus can be removed with atraumatic curets and suction cannulas. Cystic lesions as well as pure intrasellar craniopharyngiomas are well established indications for this technique.56

Extended Approaches

The idea of an approach extending beyond the sella should be credited to Hardy,57 and the routine use in clinical practice is due to Martin Weiss.58 This first step of the surgical procedure can be considered the common denominator of all the extended approaches. The endoscope is inserted in the right nostril, which is stretched upward while instruments run below it. Essential aspects of this stage, according to Kassam and his group,27 include the following:

Once the sphenoid sinus is entered, the orientation of the endoscopic view in respect to the landmarks over its posterior wall is checked and carefully maintained. The sellar floor is in the center, the planum sphenoidale is above it, and the clival indentation lies below. Lateral to the sellar floor, the bony prominences of the intracavernous carotid artery, the optic nerve, and between them, the medial and lateral opticocarotid recesses can be observed.

In the presence of a presellar or a conchal sphenoid sinus, there will be a paucity of anatomical landmarks and the use of a neuronavigation system and the microdoppler probe provides accurate information with regard to the midline and position of the parasellar internal carotid artery.

Transcribriform Approach

This approach is used for the management of cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) leaks,59 meningoencephaloceles, esthesioneuroblastoma,30,60 and meningiomas.6164 It is limited by the medial orbital wall laterally, but it can be expanded along the sagittal plane, depending on the lesion extension. However, to expose the cribriform plate, the posterior limit is marked by the posterior ethmoidal artery (Fig. E44.2A). The exposure can be further expanded anteriorly, toward the frontal sinus, through a transfrontal module, which provides access to its floor and the posterior wall30 (Fig. E44.2B).

The main steps to expose the midline anterior skull base are as follows:65

In olfactory groove meningiomas, the dura is coagulated and opened along the midline. In lesions extended to the crista galli, the dura is cauterized and incised lateral to the insertion of the falx; after coagulation of the anterior falcine artery and the inferior sagittal sinus, the falx is transected and the dura is mobilized anteriorly. Further anterior extension of the lesion may require drilling of the crista galli, which can be hyperostotic or pneumatized (10% of cases).66 After internal debulking, extracapsular dissection proceeds in a lateral to medial direction; when anterior cerebral artery branches or the anterior communicating artery lie on the surface of the tumor, a piecemeal removal is performed and the last tumor remnants are carefully dissected.

Anterior skull base lesions extending over the midplane of the orbital roof can be accessed through removal of the medial wall of the orbit and lateral displacement of the orbital tissues.

In esthesioneuroblastomas extending intradurally, the olfactory bulbs are dissected from the surface of the brain and remain attached to the dura; focal areas of brain invasion are removed by suction and dissection. The olfactory nerves are then transected posteriorly and dura is removed completely; additional dural margins can be excised for frozen section analysis.60

Transtuberculum-Transplanum Sphenoidale Approach

In 1980 Ed Laws, Jr., described the microscopic transsphenoidal approach to suprasellar lesions by taking down the planum sphenoidale,67 and the same approach was adapted for endoscopy.67,68 It is bordered by the optic nerve’s bony prominence, the opticocarotid recess, and the bony prominence of the parasellar segment of the internal carotid artery (Fig. E44.3).

The main aspects of this module are as follows:

Once the dura has been opened, the following factors are evaluated:

In many cases, mainly cystic retrosellar lesions, removal of the whole sellar floor, flush to the clivus, provides a certain degree of pituitary mobility and the parapituitary stalk corridor could be enough to expose the prepontine cistern. When dealing with solid intrasellar lesions, a transpituitary route or additional pituitary mobilization is considered (Fig. E44.4). The pituitary gland can be mobilized on one side or reflected upward. Kassam has described an en bloc transposition.69 In order to reduce stretching of the infundibulum and the length of this step, a selective dislocation upward of the central part of the gland, through a V-shaped cut of the gland, may be considered.

After mobilization of the gland, the dorsum sellae and the posterior clinoids are drilled. During drilling of the dorsum sellae, the surgeon must be aware that the working area is funnel-shaped because the intercarotid distance at the anterior wall of the sella is about 20 mm, but the posterior interclinoidal distance is about 15 mm; this configuration poses a risk of injury of the parasellar area.

Passing behind the pituitary gland, the endonasal view can be expanded up to the floor of the third ventricle, interpeduncolar fossa, and the mesial surface of the temporal lobe.

Tumor removal is tailored to the lesion, following the microsurgical principles.7174

In suprasellar supradiaphragmatic craniopharyngiomas (Fig. E44.5) the surgical strategy is guided by their relationship with the infundibulum, as has been proposed by Kassam and associates.7476 In prechiasmatic lesions the tumor is seen immediately after dural opening, with the optic nerve and chiasm stretched superiorly. During extracapsular dissection, the distal branches of the superior hypophyseal artery, which supply the inferior aspect of the chiasm and the pars tuberalis of the pituitary stalk, should be preserved. Retrochiasmatic craniopharyngiomas can be unlocked through intra- or parapituitary stalk routes, depending on their pattern of growth. When the lesion expands in the infundibulum, the intrapituitary stalk corridor leads toward the third ventricle chamber.

Intraventricular craniopharyngiomas can be managed through the endonasal route when the floor of the third ventricle is displaced inferiorly by the lesion and the infundibulum is enlarged. When dealing with such lesions some points should be kept in mind:

Retroinfundibular craniopharyngiomas can be unlocked, preserving the pituitary stalk, using the parapituitary stalk corridors and by mobilizing the gland on one side or upward, as proposed by Kassam; the critical point of this step is to avoid stretching of the pituitary stalk and retrograde cell death in the hypothalamus. When required, the surgical window can be further enlarged by drilling the dorsum sellae and removing the posterior clinoids.69

Tuberculum sellae meningiomas can be devascularized early and completely removed, together with the dura and bone involved.64,77,78 Internal debulking can be performed with radiofrequency monopolar wire electrodes (SurgiMax; Elliquence International, Hewlett, NY) and Cavitron ultrasonic aspirator.37,61 In the extracapsular dissection the pituitary gland, the pituitary stalk, and the chiasm are identified and protected with a cottonoid, with sparing of the perforators to the visual apparatus. The optic chiasm can present a neurovascular conflict with the precommunicating segment of the anterior cerebral artery.78

Transclival Approach

The clivus extends from the posterior clinoids to the craniovertebral junction (Fig. E44.6). Depending on the lesion extension along the cranial-caudal axis, the transclival approach is carried out across three main corridors—superior, middle, and inferior—which can be plainly combined as well.26,27,7985 The superior corridor unlocks the retrosellar area and has been described in the previous module. The middle corridor is developed through the following steps:

In step 3 the sphenoidal and rhinopharyngeal segments of the clivus are thus exposed at once and the corridor is bordered by the paraclival segment of the internal carotid artery and the pterygoid canal. The identification of this latter structure is not always essential and sometimes is not easy, mainly in few pneumatized sphenoid sinus; in such cases, intraoperative neuronavigation and microdoppler guide the exposure.

Extradural lesions, such as chordomas, have a propensity for insinuation into bone along lines of least resistance, and careful exploration at the lateral borders of the clivectomy is mandatory. At this level the abducens nerve is at risk at the level of its dural porus (Dorello’s point), which is on average situated 1 cm from the midline and 20 mm below the posterior clinoid process.86 At this level the nerve is in close relationship with the dorsal meningeal artery. Bleeding from the basilar venous plexus is managed.87

The intradural extension of chordomas and meningiomas is unlocked through a midline dura opening.81

After tumor removal, intradural exploration highlights, on the midline, the pons, the medulla oblongata, and the basilar artery (Fig. E44.7). Running the endoscope above the cisternal segment of the abducens nerve, the cisternal segment of the trigeminal nerve can be followed toward its dural porus, which lies about 5 mm above and lateral to Dorello’s point. Running the endoscope below the abducens nerve, the anteroinferior cerebellar artery can be followed toward the acoustic-facial bundle and, just below it, the lower cranial nerves entering the jugular foramen, which lies about 14 mm lateral to Dorello’s point. The posteroinferior cerebellar artery or its branches can be found anterior to the lower cranial nerves.

The inferior corridor unlocks the craniovertebral junction through the following steps:

After tumor removal, the vertebral artery and the origin of the posteroinferior cerebellar artery are identified. The rootlets of the hypoglossal nerve converge toward the hypoglossal canal and can be stretched by the vertebral and posteroinferior cerebellar arteries. By extending bone removal below the hypoglossal canal and angling the endoscope laterally, the intradural segment of the vertebral artery can be followed toward its dural entry.

There are three lateral boundaries of the surgical corridor:

The foramen lacerum is formed by the body of the sphenoid bone anteromedially, by the petrous apex posteriorly, and the border of the great sphenoidal wing laterally. Medially it is plugged by fibrous tissue and cartilage, being a point of least resistance, and care should be taken especially when exposure of the petrous apex is required. Below the foramen lacerum the surgical window enlarges, being bordered by the eustachian tube, which guards the parapharyngeal carotid artery: the eustachian tube lies parallel and lateral to the petrous ICA and their relationship is critical when unlocking the infratemporal fossa and the jugular foramen.

Transodontoid Approach

The endoscopic endonasal exposure of the craniovertebral junction and cervical spine is limited inferiorly by the projection of the nasopalatine line; it is a sagittal line tangential to the inferior edge of the nasal bones and the posterior edge of the hard palate.25,26,79,8891 Lateral exposure is limited by the eustachian tube, which guards the parapharyngeal ICA, and by the vertebral artery (VA) and hypoglossal nerve.28

Extradural craniocervical decompression, mainly related to rheumatoid arthritis, has been performed with interesting results.28,9295 Inherent instability of the craniovertebral junction may require posterior fusion to the occiput. Intradural extension of chordomas as well as meningiomas and even aneurysms can be treated.96,97

The main phases of the extradural exposure are similar to those used in the exposure of the inferior clivus, adding the following steps:

In patients with extradural cervicomedullary compression, an ultrasonic aspirator can be used to partially resect the pannus until pulsation transmitted by the brainstem is visible; the defect is covered with fibrin glue.

Intradural exposure of craniocervical meningiomas and chordomas requires packing of the circular sinus before midline dura opening; tumor debulking should be carried out, avoiding compression of the brainstem and strain of the hypoglossal rootlets and the perforators; the suction technique can be applied to chordomas and soft meningiomas, while fibrous meningiomas may require a low-profile Cavitron ultrasonic aspirator. Dissection of the lateral poles proceeds in a lateral to medial direction while the endoscopic closeup view highlights the intradural segment of the vertebral artery, the posteroinferior cerebellar artery, the lower cranial nerves, the ventral and dorsal rootlets of C1 and C2, and the dentate ligament between them.

Transmaxillary Transpterygoid Approach

This approach provides direct access to lesions located or extending in the lateral compartment of the cavernous sinus, lateral recess of the sphenoid sinus, anteromedial region of Meckel’s cave, or pterygopalatine and infratemporal fossae.27,39,41,42,98101 These compartments can represent the surgical target as well as part of the operative corridor (Fig. E44.8).

Surgical Procedure

The procedure starts with the aforesaid basic module because a wide endonasal corridor is needed to work properly and the wide anterior sphenoidotomy highlights reference landmarks, which make lateral exposure easier, such as the sphenoid floor and the paraclival segment of the ICA. The width of the nasomaxillary window and the drilling of the pterygoid process are tailored to the target area.98

The lateral recess of the sphenoid sinus is exposed through the following steps:98,102

image Retrograde uncinectomy: the free edge of the uncinate process is identified and the back-biting forceps points downward, away from the medial wall of the orbit.

image Wide maxillary antrostomy: the nasolacrimal duct, posteriorly, and the descending palatine artery, anteriorly, must be preserved. The nasolacrimal duct is surrounded by denser bone of the lacrimal, maxillary, and inferior turbinate bones; thence if one feels increased resistance with the back-biting forceps, the bite should not be completed.

image Opening of the sphenopalatine foramen.

image Isolation and bipolar coagulation of the sphenopalatine and posterior nasal arteries: the descending palatine artery can be dissected from its bony canal and preserved to nourish a palatal flap.103

image Identification of the ventral exit of the pterygoid canal: it is located just posterior to the sphenopalatine foramen, at the cross point between the sphenoid floor and the medial pterygoid process, which constitutes the lateral wall of the choana.84 This canal lies about 7 mm lateral to the vomerosphenoid junction, just posterior to the sphenopalatine foramen, at the junction between the sphenoid floor and the medial plate of the pterygoid process, which is the lateral wall of the choana.

image Drilling of the sphenoid floor.

image Removal of the posterior wall of the maxillary sinus up to the infraorbital nerve.

image Identification and bipolar coagulation of the terminal vessels of the maxillary artery.

image Identification of the base of the pterygoid process (Fig. E44.9).

image Identification of the foramen rotundum.

image Drilling of the medial pterygoid plate: it should be performed in a caudal-to-rostral direction and perpendicular to the clivus,39,41 up to the vidian canal, which is drilled in its inferomedial aspect while the vidian artery is highlighted and can be followed toward its origin from the anterior genu of the ICA.27,84

Meningoencephaloceles and CSF leaks can be reconstructed through this wide exposure.98,101 Soft tissue lesions extended in the lateral compartment of the cavernous sinus, such as adenomas and chordomas, can be removed using atraumatic angled suction cannulas and curets through a quadrangular area bounded superiorly by V2, inferiorly by the vidian nerve, and posteriorly by the parasellar and paraclival carotid artery13,36,40,99,104,105 (Fig. E44.10). Maintaining the dura opening and dissection below the level of V2 avoids damaging the abducens nerve running toward the superior orbital fissure.106 Furthermore, the inferolateral trunk and its branches to the cranial nerves lie in a deeper plane, which is preserved through the endonasal route.107 Meckel’s cave can be reached through this route, thus providing another strategy to deal with schwannomas extending in this area27,44,106 or to follow perineural tumor spreading when dealing with the adenoidocystic carcinoma or other sinonasal malignant tumors.

The petrous apex is limited by the internal carotid artery and the bony labyrinth anteriorly, Dorello’s point (dural porus of the abducent nerve) and the posterior cranial fossa posteriorly, Meckel’s cave and the middle cranial fossa superiorly, and the jugular bulb and inferior petrosal sinus inferiorly. It is situated deep to the vertical and horizontal internal carotid artery and can be approached at the level of the clival recess between the midclival bone and the paraclival segment of the ICA.

Extradural lesions of the medial petrous apex can expand into the sphenoid sinus, thus creating by themselves a surgical window between the dura and the carotid artery at the level of the clival recess; in such cases, after evacuation, the tumor bed can be marsupialized in the sphenoid sinus.108 If the lesion does not remodel the petrous apex, the endonasal exposure requires isolation and lateralization of the internal carotid artery. Carotid artery manipulation may be associated with postoperative unilateral rhinorrhea due to dissection of the sympathetic supply to the nose, which may be misinterpreted as a CSF leak.

The pterygopalatine fossa, lateralized to expose the lateral recess of the sphenoid sinus, can be unlocked through the same route. It is unlocked through the following steps:

Access to the infratemporal fossa is gained by enlarging the nasomaxillary window: the medial and posterolateral walls of the antrum are removed;27,44,45,109 lateral exposure may be further increased by removing the piriform aperture, and inferior extension can be obtained by removing the posterior one half of the inferior turbinate; depending on tumor extension, the pterygoid plates, the torus tubarius, and the middle one third of the eustachian tube can be removed. When dealing with sinonasal malignancies the maxillary, mandibular, and vidian nerves must be inspected for perineural tumor spreading and sacrified when necessary.

The eustachian tube is the key landmark to follow lesions extending toward the jugular foramen; the clinical application of this module must be reserved for highly experienced skull base surgeons.110 Proficiency with the three-dimensional relationship between the eustachian tube and the internal carotid is mandatory for control and injury avoidance. The eustachian tube is about 3 to 4 cm long (adult) and has an S-shaped configuration; its bony portion, which makes up about one third of the tube, is lateral to the carotid canal and superior to the jugular fossa. Its cartilaginous part is attached to the skull base at the level of the sulcus tubae, posteromedial to the foramen ovale and spinosum, and anterolateral to the foramen lacerum and the carotid canal.

Reconstruction

After tumor removal and careful hemostasis, the reconstruction of the osteodural defect is tailored to the entity of CSF leakage.103,111114 The latter is related to the degree of subarachnoid dissection.

The reconstruction technique comprises the following main steps:111,115

The vascularized flap is designed preoperatively and obtained during the basic module of the approach through the following steps:112,113,118,119

During positioning of the flap, stretching of the vascular pedicle should be avoided; the perichondral-periosteal surface should be over the nude bone. A thin layer of fibrin glue is put only over the borders of the flap. The reconstructive surface can be widened, applying free mucoperichondrium from the middle turbinate or other pedicled flaps.103,120122

Current data support the value of the vascularized flap in reducing the CSF leakage rate;75 therefore, an optimal reconstruction of the skull base should address the main factors having a negative impact on flap healing.123

In case of postoperative CSF leak, a bedside endoscopic examination is performed and, after confirmation of the correct positioning of the reconstruction material, the point of leakage is identified and fibrin glue is gently injected into the path of the leak. In our experience the thrombin solution can be diluted (1:1) with sterile saline in order to strengthen its adhesive property. Repeated applications are usually required.116 In case of failure, during surgical redo, different strategies are used, depending on the degree of integration of the autologous materials such as the nasoseptal flap and the turbinal mucoperichondrium. In patients without a history of previous irradiation, the autologous tissues are usually partially integrated; in such cases the site of leakage is identified, scarified, and closed. When complete removal of the previous reconstruction is required, the flap, if still vital, can be used again and other materials such as abdominal fat are used to reinforce and to buttress the reconstruction; in such cases a lumbar drainage tube is positioned for 5 days.

Transcranial Endoscopic Approaches

The concept of “keyhole surgery” was first introduced by Yasargil128 and then developed by Perneczky, who overcame the limits of the microscopic visualization by introducing the endoscope as a further visualizing tool during microsurgical procedures and reported early encouraging results of endoscope-assisted approaches to intracranial lesions.129131 The endoscope, introduced through limited surgical corridors, enhances visualization of structures that otherwise would be hidden by the operating microscope (endoscope-assisted technique), or it can be used as the sole visualizing tool during the whole procedure (endoscope-controlled technique). Different techniques of image fusion between endoscope and microscope have been proposed over the years;132 however, the two devices tend to exclude each other.

Endoscopic Supraorbital Approach

The microsurgical and the endoscope-assisted supraorbital approaches can be used for lesions in the anterior fossa, the sellar region, and the anterior circle of Willis. They seem advantageous in the following cases:

Surgical Technique

The Mayfield headholder should be positioned away from the operative field, with one pin at the level of the contralateral frontal area, behind the hairline. The patient is positioned supine and the head should be positioned as follows:

The technique then proceeds along the following steps:

At the level of the anterior skull base, olfactory groove meningiomas with lateral extension can be debulked after bipolar coagulation of their basal attachment; the tumor can be followed toward the midline. During development of the surgical corridor and extracapsular tumor removal, meticulous arachnoid dissection with diamond microscalpel or tube-shaft scissors avoids traction of the optic nerve, the ophthalmic artery, the superior hypophyseal artery, and the perforators from the anterior communicating complex.

In patients with tuberculum sellae and diaphragma sellae meningiomas (Fig. E44.11) close inspection of the optic nerve when entering the canal is mandatory; optic canal decompression or intradural drilling of the anterior clinoid process can be performed with an ultrasonic bone curet.136

When dealing with craniopharyngiomas extending beyond the supraclinoidal ICA, the well-known multiple corridors can be used to approach the lesion137 (Fig. E44.12).

After tumor removal, the dura is closed in watertight fashion and the frontal sinus is properly managed, if opened; the bone flap should be carefully approximated medially while the bur hole can be covered with the titanium plates. Closure is accomplished in three layers: periosteal-galeal layer, subcutaneous tissue, and skin.

Endoscopic Retrosigmoid Approach

The microsurgical retrosigmoid approach is a well-established and highly effective technique for both lesion removal and microvascular decompression. During surgery for vestibular schwannomas, the need to improve exposure of the lateral internal acoustic canal has driven the introduction of the endoscope-assisted technique;138,139 the endoscopic visualization has been advantageous in the following cases:

Recently, the pure endoscopic technique has been applied to well-selected avascular lesions such as epidermoids142 and arachnoid cysts and during microvascular decompression procedures.

Surgical Technique

Depending on the surgeon’s preference the patient can be positioned in supine, park-bench, or prone position, the latter being reserved for patients with very short thin neck or prominent shoulders. The optimal position should allow gravity-related self-retraction and comfort for the patient, for the surgeon, and the operative staff; it should also avoid venous and CSF congestion. In our opinion the supine position fulfills such requirements granted that the following is accomplished:

Bone exposure is the most critical point in obtaining adequate exposure, and image guidance can aid even the experienced surgeon to pinpoint the skin incision and the first bur hole. However, precise orientation of the bony surface landmarks is mandatory once the desired trajectory has been confirmed by image guidance.

We use a 10-cm, 0-degree endoscope held by the co-surgeon free hand during the whole procedure in a dynamic fashion, which means following in and out movements of the instruments and updating the view (panoramic or closeup) depending on the need of the co-surgeon.

The main steps of the procedure are as follows:

After arachnoid dissection and CSF drainage, the endoscope highlights the acoustic facial bundle as the first surgical landmark.143 The whole cerebellopontine angle can be unlocked through the following specific working corridors, above and below the acoustic-facial nerve bundle:

The endoscopic technique allows optimal removal of avascular lesions extending along several corridors such as epidermoids142 (Fig. E44.13) and several reports concerning endoscope-assisted microvascular decompression underline the ability of the endoscope to highlight nerve conflicts hidden with the microsurgical view. Furthermore, the endoscope may ease the treatment of complex neurovascular conflicts when transposition of the vessel is required.

Discussion

Future Developments

Research in endoscopic surgery is expanding in three main directions:

The evolution of the optical devices has helped to overcome the limits of microsurgical visualization and has disclosed new horizons. The microscope is and will continue to be essential for many neurosurgical procedures. However, the endoscope is an integral component of the surgical armamentarium contributing to modern diagnostic and operative management of the patients which cannot be absent in any operating suite.

Further development of the endoscopic techniques will be driven by several technological advances such as high-definition intraoperative digital imaging, three-dimensional endoscopy, chip-stick technology, integrated operating room, dedicated instruments, virtual reality systems,146 and nanotechnology.147,148 Modern integrated operating rooms provide advanced capabilities in telemedicine and live telesurgery, which will further speed the use of the endoscopic techniques. Three-dimensional endoscopy149,150 provides a sense of depth similar to that of the microscope that most neurosurgeons are familiar with. Virtual imaging will flank cadaver dissection in training laboratories and one day might guide a robot-like system in an up-to-date virtual space.16,47 Furthermore, new instruments may use nanosensors for in vivo real-time histopathological examination of lesions and may permit implantation of antineoplastic agents tailored to the patient’s tumor. International congresses on endoscopy feature a chance for interactive dialogue among surgeons, researchers, and health care leaders, providing a base for active cooperation and further developments.147

Conclusion

Cushing’s early attempts to remove intra- and suprasellar lesions through the transsphenoidal route were limited by the low illumination of the surgical field.152 The advent of the binocular operating microscope provided a new standard of vision and allowed the reinassance of the transsphenoidal technique. Hardy refined the transsphenoidal approach to sellar, suprasellar, and even clival pathology and, in 1971, declared the transsphenoidal approach to be the standard of care for pituitary adenomas.57

In 1980 Edward Laws67 demonstrated the feasibility of using the transsphenoidal approach for craniopharyngiomas, and in 1977 Apuzzo31 described the successful resection of sellar tumors with suprasellar extensions using an endoscope-assisted technique. The ENT surgeons prepared the way for “pure” endoscopic endonasal approaches through the evolution of FESS. Amin Kassam guided a systematic evolution of endoscopic skull base surgery through tireless teamwork and a special dedication to skull base anatomy and to the microvascular correspondence between feeders and relevant structures and function. Technical evolution of the endoscopic equipment, dedicated instruments, and related materials favored the optimization of the endoscopic technique. Leading neurosurgical groups reported encouraging results in the endoscopic endonasal approach to tuberculum sellae meningiomas and chordomas. The value of this strategy when dealing with craniopharyngiomas is borne out by papers highlighting the technical nuances and by several outcome studies. A 360-degree exposure of the skull base can be obtained through the transcranial routes in a “pure endoscopic” or endoscope-assisted modality, depending on the case-specific situation and the team’s experience.

In order to optimize the results of the endoscopic skull base technique, it is mandatory to set up a multidisciplinary team with state-of-the-art facilities and an optimal case load; trustworthy scientific papers should be produced in order to share and compare results, complications, and the course of the learning curve. This joint resolution will fine-tune and strengthen an evidence-based application of the endoscopic technique.

References

1. Kennedy D.W. Functional endoscopic sinus surgery. Technique Arch Otolaryngol. 1985;111:643-649.

2. Messerklinger W. Nasal endoscopy: demonstration, localization and differential diagnosis of nasal liquorrhea. HNO. 1972;20:268-270.

3. Messerklinger W. Diagnosis and endoscopic surgery of the nose and its adjoining structures. Acta Otorhinolaryngol Belg. 1980;34:170-176.

4. Stammberger H. Endoscopic endonasal surgery—concepts in treatment of recurring rhinosinusitis. Part II. Surgical technique. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 1986;94:147-156.

5. Stammberger H., Posawetz W. Functional endoscopic sinus surgery. Concept, indications and results of the Messerklinger technique. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 1990;247:63-76.

6. Cappabianca P., de Divitiis O., Maiuri F. Evolution of transsphenoidal surgery. In: de Divitiis E., Cappabianca P., editors. Endoscopic Endonasal Transsphenoidal Surgery. New York: Springer; 2003:1-7.

7. Jankowski R., Auque J., Simon C., et al. Endoscopic pituitary tumor surgery. Laryngoscope. 1992;102:198-202.

8. Carrau R.L., Jho H.D., Ko Y. Transnasal-transsphenoidal endoscopic surgery of the pituitary gland. Laryngoscope. 1996;106:914-918.

9. Jho H.D., Carrau R.L. Endoscopy assisted transsphenoidal surgery for pituitary adenoma. Technical note. Acta Neurochir (Wien). 1996;138:1416-1425.

10. Jho H.D., Carrau R.L., Ko Y. Endoscopic pituitary surgery. In: Wilkins H., Rengachary S., editors. Neurosurgical Operative Atlas. Park Ridge, IL: American Association of Neurological Surgeons; 1996:1-12.

11. Cappabianca P., Alfieri A., Colao A., et al. Endoscopic endonasal transsphenoidal approach: an additional reason in support of surgery in the management of pituitary lesions. Skull Base Surg. 1999;9:109-117.

12. Cappabianca P., Alfieri A., de Divitiis E. Endoscopic endonasal transsphenoidal approach to the sella: towards functional endoscopic pituitary surgery (FEPS). Minim Invasive Neurosurg. 1998;41:66-73.

13. Frank G., Pasquini E. Endoscopic endonasal approaches to the cavernous sinus: surgical approaches. Neurosurgery. 2002;50:675.

14. Kassam A., Snyderman C.H., Mintz A., et al. Expanded endonasal approach: the rostrocaudal axis. Part I. Crista galli to the sella turcica. Neurosurg Focus. 2005;19:E3.

15. Cappabianca P., Alfieri A., Thermes S., et al. Instruments for endoscopic endonasal transsphenoidal surgery. Neurosurgery. 1999;45:392-395. discussion 395-396

16. Cinalli G., Cappabianca P., de Falco R., et al. Current state and future development of intracranial neuroendoscopic surgery. Expert Rev Med Devices. 2005;2:351-373.

17. Gardner P., Kassam A., Snyderman C., et al. Endoscopic endonasal suturing of dural reconstruction grafts: a novel application of the U-Clip technology. Technical note. J Neurosurg. 2008;108:395-400.

18. Prevedello D.M., Kassam A.B., Gardner P., et al. “Q-tip” retractor in endoscopic cranial base surgery. Neurosurgery. 2010;66:363-366. discussion 366-367

19. Anand V.K., Schwartz T.H., Hiltzik D.H., Kacker A. Endoscopic transsphenoidal pituitary surgery with real-time intraoperative magnetic resonance imaging. Am J Rhinol. 2006;20:401-405.

20. Asthagiri A.R., Laws E.R.Jr., Jane J.A.Jr. Image guidance in pituitary surgery. Front Horm Res. 2006;34:46-63.

21. Jagannathan J., Prevedello D.M., Ayer V.S., et al. Computer-assisted frameless stereotaxy in transsphenoidal surgery at a single institution: review of 176 cases. Neurosurg Focus. 2006;20:E9.

22. Lasio G., Ferroli P., Felisati G., Broggi G. Image-guided endoscopic transnasal removal of recurrent pituitary adenomas. Neurosurgery. 2002;51:132-136. discussion 136-137

23. Levy M.L., Nguyen A., Aryan H., et al. Robotic virtual endoscopy: development of a multidirectional rigid endoscope. Neurosurgery. 2008;62(Suppl 2):599-606.

24. Schulze F., Buhler K., Neubauer A., et al. Intra-operative virtual endoscopy for image guided endonasal transsphenoidal pituitary surgery. Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg. 2010;5(2):143-154.

25. Cavallo L.M., Messina A., Cappabianca P., et al. Endoscopic endonasal surgery of the midline skull base: anatomical study and clinical considerations. Neurosurg Focus. 2005;19:E2.

26. Kassam A., Snyderman C.H., Mintz A., et al. Expanded endonasal approach: the rostrocaudal axis. Part II. Posterior clinoids to the foramen magnum. Neurosurg Focus. 2005;19:E4.

27. Kassam A.B., Gardner P., Snyderman C., et al. Expanded endonasal approach: fully endoscopic, completely transnasal approach to the middle third of the clivus, petrous bone, middle cranial fossa, and infratemporal fossa. Neurosurg Focus. 2005;19:E6.

28. Kassam A.B., Snyderman C., Gardner P., et al. The expanded endonasal approach: a fully endoscopic transnasal approach and resection of the odontoid process: technical case report. Neurosurgery. 2005;57:E213. discussion E213

29. Ketcham A.S., Chretien P.B., Van Buren J.M., et al. The ethmoid sinuses: a re-evaluation of surgical resection. Am J Surg. 1973;126:469-476.

30. Snyderman C.H., Pant H., Carrau R.L., et al. What are the limits of endoscopic sinus surgery? The expanded endonasal approach to the skull base. Keio J Med. 2009;58:152-160.

31. Apuzzo M.L., Heifetz M.D., Weiss M.H., Kurze T. Neurosurgical endoscopy using the side-viewing telescope. J Neurosurg. 1977;46:398-400.

32. Kassam A.B., Engh J.A., Mintz A.H., Prevedello D.M. Completely endoscopic resection of intraparenchymal brain tumors. J Neurosurg. 2009;110:116-123.

33. Aydin S., Cavallo L.M., Messina A., et al. The endoscopic endonasal trans-sphenoidal approach to the sellar and suprasellar area. Anatomic study. J Neurosurg Sci. 2007;51:129-138.

34. Catapano D., Sloffer C.A., Frank G., et al. Comparison between the microscope and endoscope in the direct endonasal extended transsphenoidal approach: anatomical study. J Neurosurg. 2006;104:419-425.

35. Cavallo L.M., Dal Fabbro M., Jalalod’din H., et al. Endoscopic endonasal transsphenoidal surgery. Before scrubbing in: tips and tricks. Surg Neurol. 2007;67:342-347.

36. Doglietto F., Lauretti L., Frank G., et al. Microscopic and endoscopic extracranial approaches to the cavernous sinus: anatomic study. Neurosurgery. 2009;64:413-421.

37. Cappabianca P., Cavallo L.M., Esposito F., et al. Extended endoscopic endonasal approach to the midline skull base: the evolving role of transsphenoidal surgery. Adv Tech Stand Neurosurg. 2008;33:151-199.

38. Prevedello D.M., Kassam A.B., Snyderman C., et al. Endoscopic cranial base surgery: ready for prime time? Clin Neurosurg. 2007;54:48-57.

39. Cavallo L.M., Messina A., Gardner P., et al. Extended endoscopic endonasal approach to the pterygopalatine fossa: anatomical study and clinical considerations. Neurosurg Focus. 2005;19:E5.

40. Frank G., Pasquini E. Endoscopic endonasal cavernous sinus surgery, with special reference to pituitary adenomas. Front Horm Res. 2006;34:64-82.

41. Magro F., Solari D., Cavallo L.M., et al. The endoscopic endonasal approach to the lateral recess of the sphenoid sinus via the pterygopalatine fossa: comparison of endoscopic and radiological landmarks. Neurosurgery. 2006;59:ONS237-ONS242.

42. Solari D., Magro F., Cappabianca P., et al. Anatomical study of the pterygopalatine fossa using an endoscopic endonasal approach: spatial relations and distances between surgical landmarks. J Neurosurg. 2007;106:157-163.

43. Herzallah I.R., Germani R., Casiano R.R. Endoscopic transnasal study of the infratemporal fossa: a new orientation. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2009;140:861-865.

44. Hofstetter C.P., Singh A., Anand V.K., et al. The endoscopic, endonasal, transmaxillary transpterygoid approach to the pterygopalatine fossa, infratemporal fossa, petrous apex, and the Meckel cave. J Neurosurg. 2010;113(5):967-974.

45. Theodosopoulos P.V., Guthikonda B., Brescia A., et al. Endoscopic approach to the infratemporal fossa: anatomic study. Neurosurgery. 2010;66:196-202.

46. Castelnuovo P., Bignami M., Pistochini A., et al. Endoscopic endonasal management of encephaloceles in children: an eight-year experience. Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol. 2009;73:1132-1136.

47. Gardner P.A., Kassam A.B., Rothfus W.E., et al. Preoperative and intraoperative imaging for endoscopic endonasal approaches to the skull base. Otolaryngol Clin North Am. 2008;41:215-230.

48. Fernandez-Miranda J.C., Prevedello D.M., Madhok R., et al. Sphenoid septations and their relationship with internal carotid arteries: anatomical and radiological study. Laryngoscope. 2009;119:1893-1896.

49. Cappabianca P., Cavallo L.M., Esposito I., Tschabitscher M. Transsphenoidal approaches: endoscopic. In: Cappabianca P., Califano L., Iaconetta G., editors. Cranial, Craniofacial and Skull Base Surgery. Milan: Springer-Verlag; 2010:197-212.

50. Brown S.M., Anand V.K., Tabaee A., Schwartz T.H. Role of perioperative antibiotics in endoscopic skull base surgery. Laryngoscope. 2007;117:1528-1532.

51. Cafiero T., Cavallo L.M., Frangiosa A., et al. Clinical comparison of remifentanil-sevoflurane vs. remifentanil-propofol for endoscopic endonasal transsphenoidal surgery. Eur J Anaesthesiol. 2007;24:441-446.

52. Cappabianca P., Cavallo L.M., de Divitiis E. Endoscopic Pituitary and Skull Base Surgery. Anatomy and Surgery of the Endoscopic Endonasal Approach. Tuttlingen: Endo Press; 2008.

53. Castelnuovo P., Pistochini A., Locatelli D. Different surgical approaches to the sellar region: focusing on the “two nostrils four hands technique.”. Rhinology. 2006;44:2-7.

54. Cappabianca P., Cavallo L.M., de Divitiis O., et al. Endoscopic pituitary surgery. Pituitary. 2008;11:385-390.

55. Oldfield E.H., Vortmeyer A.O. Development of a histological pseudocapsule and its use as a surgical capsule in the excision of pituitary tumors. J Neurosurg. 2006;104:7-19.

56. Cavallo L.M., Prevedello D., Esposito F., et al. The role of the endoscope in the transsphenoidal management of cystic lesions of the sellar region. Neurosurg Rev. 2008;31:55-64.

57. Hardy J. Transsphenoidal hypophysectomy. J Neurosurg. 1971;34:582-594.

58. Weiss M.H. The transnasal transsphenoidal approach. In: Apuzzo M.L.J., editor. Surgery of the Third Ventricle. Baltimore: Williams & Wilkins; 1987:476-494.

59. Locatelli D., Rampa F., Acchiardi I., et al. Endoscopic endonasal approaches for repair of cerebrospinal fluid leaks: nine-year experience. Neurosurgery. 2006;58:ONS246-ONS256.

60. Castelnuovo P.G., Delu G., Sberze F., et al. Esthesioneuroblastoma: endonasal endoscopic treatment. Skull Base. 2006;16:25-30.

61. de Divitiis E., Cavallo L.M., Cappabianca P., Esposito F. Extended endoscopic endonasal transsphenoidal approach for the removal of suprasellar tumors: part 2. Neurosurgery. 2007;60:46-58.

62. de Divitiis E., Esposito F., Cappabianca P., et al. Endoscopic transnasal resection of anterior cranial fossa meningiomas. Neurosurg Focus. 2008;25:E8.

63. Fernandez-Miranda J.C., Gardner P.A., Prevedello D.M., Kassam A.B. Expanded endonasal approach for olfactory groove meningioma. Acta Neurochir (Wien). 2009;151:287-288. author reply 289-290

64. Gardner P.A., Kassam A.B., Thomas A., et al. Endoscopic endonasal resection of anterior cranial base meningiomas. Neurosurgery. 2008;63:36-52.

65. de Notaris M., Esposito I., Cavallo L.M., et al. Endoscopic endonasal approach to the ethmoidal planum: anatomic study. Neurosurg Rev. 2008;31:309-317.

66. Lang J. Skull Base and Related Structures: Atlas of Clinical Anatomy. Stuttgart: Schattauer; 2001.

67. Laws E.R.Jr. Transsphenoidal microsurgery in the management of craniopharyngioma. J Neurosurg. 1980;52:661-666.

68. Doglietto F., Prevedello D.M., Jane J.A.Jr., et al. Brief history of endoscopic transsphenoidal surgery—from Philipp Bozzini to the First World Congress of Endoscopic Skull Base Surgery. Neurosurg Focus. 2005;19:E3.

69. Kassam A.B., Prevedello D.M., Thomas A., et al. Endoscopic endonasal pituitary transposition for a transdorsum sellae approach to the interpeduncular cistern. Neurosurgery. 2008;62:57-72.

70. Cappabianca P., Cavallo L.M., Esposito I., et al. Bone removal with a new ultrasonic bone curette during endoscopic endonasal approach to the sellar-suprasellar area. Technical note. Neurosurgery. 2010;66(Suppl 3):E118.

71. Cappabianca P., Cavallo L.M., Esposito F., de Divitiis E. Craniopharyngiomas. J Neurosurg. 2008;109:1-3. reply 3-5

72. Cavallo L.M., Prevedello D.M., Solari D., et al. Extended endoscopic endonasal transsphenoidal approach for residual or recurrent craniopharyngiomas. J Neurosurg. 2009;111:578-589.

73. de Divitiis E., Cappabianca P., Cavallo L.M., et al. Extended endoscopic transsphenoidal approach for extrasellar craniopharyngiomas. Neurosurgery. 2007;61:219-227. discussion 228

74. Kassam A.B., Gardner P.A., Snyderman C.H., et al. Expanded endonasal approach, a fully endoscopic transnasal approach for the resection of midline suprasellar craniopharyngiomas: a new classification based on the infundibulum. J Neurosurg. 2008;108:715-728.

75. Gardner P.A., Kassam A.B., Snyderman C.H., et al. Outcomes following endoscopic, expanded endonasal resection of suprasellar craniopharyngiomas: a case series. J Neurosurg. 2008;109:6-16.

76. Gardner P.A., Prevedello D.M., Kassam A.B., et al. The evolution of the endonasal approach for craniopharyngiomas. J Neurosurg. 2008;108:1043-1047.

77. de Divitiis E., Cavallo L.M., Esposito F., et al. Extended endoscopic transsphenoidal approach for tuberculum sellae meningiomas. Neurosurgery. 2007;61:229-237.

78. de Divitiis E., Esposito F., Cappabianca P., et al. Tuberculum sellae meningiomas: high route or low route? A series of 51 consecutive cases. Neurosurgery. 2008;62:556-563. discussion 556-563

79. Cavallo L.M., Cappabianca P., Messina A., et al. The extended endoscopic endonasal approach to the clivus and cranio-vertebral junction: anatomical study. Childs Nerv Syst. 2007;23:665-671.

80. de Notaris M., Cavallo L.M., Prats-Galino A., et al. Endoscopic endonasal transclival approach and retrosigmoid approach to the clival and petroclival regions. Neurosurgery. 2009;65:42-50. discussion 42-50

81. Dehdashti A.R., Karabatsou K., Ganna A., et al. Expanded endoscopic endonasal approach for treatment of clival chordomas: early results in 12 patients. Neurosurgery. 2008;63:299-307. discussion 299-307

82. Frank G., Sciarretta V., Calbucci F., et al. The endoscopic transnasal transsphenoidal approach for the treatment of cranial base chordomas and chondrosarcomas. Neurosurgery. 2006;59:ONS50-ONS57. discussion ONS50-ONS57

83. Fraser J.F., Nyquist G.G., Moore N., et al. Endoscopic endonasal transclival resection of chordomas: operative technique, clinical outcome, and review of the literature. J Neurosurg. 2010;112(5):1061-1069.

84. Kassam A.B., Vescan A.D., Carrau R.L., et al. Expanded endonasal approach: vidian canal as a landmark to the petrous internal carotid artery. J Neurosurg. 2008;108:177-183.

85. Stippler M., Gardner P.A., Snyderman C.H., et al. Endoscopic endonasal approach for clival chordomas. Neurosurgery. 2009;64:268-277.

86. Iaconetta G., Fusco M., Cavallo L.M., et al. The abducens nerve: microanatomic and endoscopic study. Neurosurgery. 2007;61:7-14. discussion 14

87. Cappabianca P., Esposito F., Esposito I., et al. Use of a thrombin-gelatin haemostatic matrix in endoscopic endonasal extended approaches: technical note. Acta Neurochir (Wien). 2009;151:69-77.

88. Abuzayed B., Tanriover N., Gazioglu N., et al. Extended endoscopic endonasal approach to the anterior cranio-vertebral junction: anatomic study. Turk Neurosurg. 2009;19:249-255.

89. Baird C.J., Conway J.E., Sciubba D.M., et al. Radiographic and anatomic basis of endoscopic anterior craniocervical decompression: a comparison of endonasal, transoral, and transcervical approaches. Neurosurgery. 2009;65:158-163.

90. de Almeida J.R., Zanation A.M., Snyderman C.H., et al. Defining the nasopalatine line: the limit for endonasal surgery of the spine. Laryngoscope. 2009;119:239-244.

91. Messina A., Bruno M.C., Decq P., et al. Pure endoscopic endonasal odontoidectomy: anatomical study. Neurosurg Rev. 2007;30:189-194.

92. Laufer I., Greenfield J.P., Anand V.K., et al. Endonasal endoscopic resection of the odontoid process in a nonachondroplastic dwarf with juvenile rheumatoid arthritis: feasibility of the approach and utility of the intraoperative Iso-C three-dimensional navigation. Case report. J Neurosurg Spine. 2008;8:376-380.

93. Leng L.Z., Anand V.K., Hartl R., Schwartz T.H. Endonasal endoscopic resection of an os odontoideum to decompress the cervicomedullary junction: a minimal access surgical technique. Spine. 2009;34:E139-E143.

94. Magrini S., Pasquini E., Mazzatenta D., et al. Endoscopic endonasal odontoidectomy in a patient affected by Down syndrome: technical case report. Neurosurgery. 2008;63:E373-E374.

95. Nayak J.V., Gardner P.A., Vescan A.D., et al. Experience with the expanded endonasal approach for resection of the odontoid process in rheumatoid disease. Am J Rhinol. 2007;21:601-606.

96. Eloy J.A., Carai A., Patel A.B., et al. Combined endoscope-assisted transclival clipping and endovascular stenting of a basilar trunk aneurysm: case report. Neurosurgery. 2008;62:142-143. discussion 143-144

97. Kassam A.B., Mintz A.H., Gardner P.A., et al. The expanded endonasal approach for an endoscopic transnasal clipping and aneurysmorrhaphy of a large vertebral artery aneurysm: technical case report. Neurosurgery. 2006;59:ONSE162-ONSE165.

98. Castelnuovo P., Dallan I., Pistochini A., et al. Endonasal endoscopic repair of Sternberg’s canal cerebrospinal fluid leaks. Laryngoscope. 2007;117:345-349.

99. Cavallo L.M., Cappabianca P., Galzio R., et al. Endoscopic transnasal approach to the cavernous sinus versus transcranial route: anatomic study. Neurosurgery. 2005;56:379-389.

100. Fortes F.S., Sennes L.U., Carrau R.L., et al. Endoscopic anatomy of the pterygopalatine fossa and the transpterygoid approach: development of a surgical instruction model. Laryngoscope. 2008;118:44-49.

101. Tabaee A., Anand V.K., Cappabianca P., et al. Endoscopic management of spontaneous meningoencephalocele of the lateral sphenoid sinus. J Neurosurg. 2010;112(5):1070-1077.

102. Pasquini E., Sciarretta V., Farneti G., et al. Endoscopic treatment of encephaloceles of the lateral wall of the sphenoid sinus. Minim Invasive Neurosurg. 2004;47:209-213.

103. Oliver C.L., Hackman T.G., Carrau R.L., et al. Palatal flap modifications allow pedicled reconstruction of the skull base. Laryngoscope. 2008;118:2102-2106.

104. Ceylan S., Koc K., Anik I. Endoscopic endonasal transsphenoidal approach for pituitary adenomas invading the cavernous sinus. J Neurosurg. 2010;112:99-107.

105. D’Avella E., Tschabitscher M., Santoro A., Delfini R. Blood supply to the intracavernous cranial nerves: comparison of the endoscopic and microsurgical perspectives. Neurosurgery. 2008;62:ONS305-ONS310.

106. Kassam A.B., Prevedello D.M., Carrau R.L., et al. The front door to Meckel’s cave: an anteromedial corridor via expanded endoscopic endonasal approach—technical considerations and clinical series. Neurosurgery. 2009;64:71-82.

107. Conti M., Prevedello D.M., Madhok R., et al. The antero-medial triangle: the risk for cranial nerves ischemia at the cavernous sinus lateral wall. Anatomic cadaveric study. Clin Neurol Neurosurg. 2008;110:682-686.

108. Zanation A.M., Snyderman C.H., Carrau R.L., et al. Endoscopic endonasal surgery for petrous apex lesions. Laryngoscope. 2009;119:19-25.

109. Harvey R.J., Sheehan P.O., Debnath N.I., Schlosser R.J. Transseptal approach for extended endoscopic resections of the maxilla and infratemporal fossa. Am J Rhinol Allergy. 2009;23:426-432.

110. Zimmer L.A., Hirsch B.E., Kassam A., et al. Resection of a recurrent paraganglioma via an endoscopic transnasal approach to the jugular fossa. Otol Neurotol. 2006;27:398-402.

111. Cavallo L.M., Messina A., Esposito F., et al. Skull base reconstruction in the extended endoscopic transsphenoidal approach for suprasellar lesions. J Neurosurg. 2007;107:713-720.

112. Hadad G., Bassagasteguy L., Carrau R.L., et al. A novel reconstructive technique after endoscopic expanded endonasal approaches: vascular pedicle nasoseptal flap. Laryngoscope. 2006;116:1882-1886.

113. Kassam A.B., Thomas A., Carrau R.L., et al. Endoscopic reconstruction of the cranial base using a pedicled nasoseptal flap. Neurosurgery. 2008;63:ONS44-ONS52.

114. Tabaee A., Anand V.K., Brown S.M., et al. Algorithm for reconstruction after endoscopic pituitary and skull base surgery. Laryngoscope. 2007;117:1133-1137.

115. Leng L.Z., Brown S., Anand V.K., Schwartz T.H. “Gasket-seal” watertight closure in minimal-access endoscopic cranial base surgery. Neurosurgery. 2008;62:ONSE342-ONSE343.

116. Cappabianca P., Esposito F., Magro F., et al. Natura abhorret a vacuo—use of fibrin glue as a filler and sealant in neurosurgical “dead spaces.” Technical note. Acta Neurochir (Wien). 2010;152(5):897-904.

117. Fraioli R.E., Hirsch B.E., Kassam A.B. Fibrin sealant for control of cerebrospinal fluid otorrhea. Am J Otolaryngol. 2008;29:135-137.

118. Pinheiro-Neto C.D., Prevedello D.M., Carrau R.L., et al. Improving the design of the pedicled nasoseptal flap for skull base reconstruction: a radioanatomic study. Laryngoscope. 2007;117:1560-1569.

119. Zanation A.M., Carrau R.L., Snyderman C.H., et al. Nasoseptal flap reconstruction of high flow intraoperative cerebral spinal fluid leaks during endoscopic skull base surgery. Am J Rhinol Allergy. 2009;23:518-521.

120. Fortes F.S., Carrau R.L., Snyderman C.H., et al. Transpterygoid transposition of a temporoparietal fascia flap: a new method for skull base reconstruction after endoscopic expanded endonasal approaches. Laryngoscope. 2007;117:970-976.

121. Fortes F.S., Carrau R.L., Snyderman C.H., et al. The posterior pedicle inferior turbinate flap: a new vascularized flap for skull base reconstruction. Laryngoscope. 2007;117:1329-1332.

122. Zanation A.M., Snyderman C.H., Carrau R.L., et al. Minimally invasive endoscopic pericranial flap: a new method for endonasal skull base reconstruction. Laryngoscope. 2009;119:13-18.

123. Castelnuovo P., Mauri S., Locatelli D., et al. Endoscopic repair of cerebrospinal fluid rhinorrhea: learning from our failures. Am J Rhinol. 2001;15:333-342.

124. Cappabianca P., Briganti F., Cavallo L.M., de Divitiis E. Pseudoaneurysm of the intracavernous carotid artery following endoscopic endonasal transsphenoidal surgery, treated by endovascular approach. Acta Neurochir (Wien). 2001;143:95-96.

125. Cavallo L.M., Briganti F., Cappabianca P., et al. Hemorrhagic vascular complications of endoscopic transsphenoidal surgery. Minim Invasive Neurosurg. 2004;47:145-150.

126. Kassam A., Snyderman C.H., Carrau R.L., et al. Endoneurosurgical hemostasis techniques: lessons learned from 400 cases. Neurosurg Focus. 2005;19:E7.

127. Laws E.R.Jr. Vascular complications of transsphenoidal surgery. Pituitary. 1999;2:163-170.

128. Yasargil M.G. Introduction. In: Yasargil M.G., editor. Microneurosurgery. New York: Thieme; 1984:3.

129. Fries G., Perneczky A. Endoscope-assisted brain surgery: part 2—analysis of 380 procedures. Neurosurgery. 1998;42:226-231.

130. Perneczky A., Fries G. Endoscope-assisted brain surgery: part 1—evolution, basic concept, and current technique. Neurosurgery. 1998;42:219-224.

131. Perneczky A., Muller-Forell W., van Lindert E., Fries G. Keyhole concept in neurosurgery. Stuttgart: Thieme; 1999.

132. Kassam A., Horowitz M., Welch W., et al. The role of endoscopic assisted microneurosurgery (image fusion technology) in the performance of neurosurgical procedures. Minim Invasive Neurosurg. 2005;48:191-196.

133. Knopman J., Sigounas D., Huang C., et al. Combined supraciliary and endoscopic endonasal approach for resection of frontal sinus mucoceles: technical note. Minim Invasive Neurosurg. 2009;52:149-151.

134. King W.A., Frazee J.G., Teo C., Wackym P.A. Endoscopic treatment of cranial base lesions. In: King W.A., Frazee J.G., Salles A.A.F.D., editors. Endoscopy of the Central and Peripheral Nervous System. New York: Thieme; 1998:120-136.

135. Reisch R., Perneczky A. Ten-year experience with the supraorbital subfrontal approach through an eyebrow skin incision. Neurosurgery. 2005;57:242-255.

136. Chang H.S., Joko M., Song J.S., et al. Ultrasonic bone curettage for optic canal unroofing and anterior clinoidectomy. Technical note. J Neurosurg. 2006;104:621-624.

137. Tschabitscher M., Galzio R. Central skull base anatomy as seen through the endoscope. In: Dolenc V.V., editor. Cavernous Sinus. New York: Springer; 2008:54-57.

138. Badr-El-Dine M., El-Garem H.F., Talaat A.M., Magnan J. Endoscopically assisted minimally invasive microvascular decompression of hemifacial spasm. Otol Neurotol. 2002;23:122-128.

139. Schroeder H.W., Oertel J., Gaab M.R. Endoscope-assisted microsurgical resection of epidermoid tumors of the cerebellopontine angle. J Neurosurg. 2004;101:227-232.

140. Teo C., Nakaji P., Mobbs R.J. Endoscope-assisted microvascular decompression for trigeminal neuralgia: technical case report. Neurosurgery. 2006;59:ONSE489-ONSE490.

141. Magnan J., Caces F., Locatelli P., Chays A. Hemifacial spasm: endoscopic vascular decompression. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 1997;117:308-314.

142. de Divitiis O., Cavallo L.M., Dal Fabbro M., et al. Freehand dynamic endoscopic resection of an epidermoid tumor of the cerebellopontine angle: technical case report. Neurosurgery. 2007;61:E239-E240.

143. Cappabianca P., Cavallo L.M., Esposito F., et al. Endoscopic examination of the cerebellar pontine angle. Clin Neurol Neurosurg. 2002;104:387-391.

144. Magnan J., Barbieri M., Mora R., et al. Retrosigmoid approach for small and medium-sized acoustic neuromas. Otol Neurotol. 2002;23:141-145.

145. Onizuka M., Tokunaga Y., Shibayama A., Miyazaki H. Computer-assisted neurosurgical navigational system for transsphenoidal surgery—technical note. Neurol Med Chir (Tokyo). 2001;41:565-568. discussion 569

146. Tyler-Kabara E.C., Kassam A.B., Horowitz M.H., et al. Predictors of outcome in surgically managed patients with typical and atypical trigeminal neuralgia: comparison of results following microvascular decompression. J Neurosurg. 2002;96:527-531.

147. Cappabianca P., Decq P., Schroeder H.W. Future of endoscopy in neurosurgery. Surg Neurol. 2007;67:496-498.

148. Snyderman C.H., Carrau R.L., Prevedello D.M., et al. Technologic innovations in neuroendoscopic surgery. Otolaryngol Clin North Am. 2009;42:883-890.

149. Roth J., Singh A., Nyquist G., et al. Three-dimensional and 2-dimensional endoscopic exposure of midline cranial base targets using expanded endonasal and transcranial approaches. Neurosurgery. 2009;65:1116-1128. discussion 1128-1130

150. Tabaee A., Anand V.K., Fraser J.F., et al. Three-dimensional endoscopic pituitary surgery. Neurosurgery. 2009;64:288-293.

151. Snyderman C., Kassam A., Carrau R., et al. Acquisition of surgical skills for endonasal skull base surgery: a training program. Laryngoscope. 2007;117:699-705.

152. Cushing H. Intracranial Tumours. Notes Upon a Series of Two-Thousand Verified Cases with Surgical-Mortality Percentages Pertaining Thereto. Springfield, IL: Charles C Thomas; 1932.