Managing submandibular glands

Published on 22/05/2015 by admin

Filed under Plastic Reconstructive Surgery

Last modified 22/04/2025

Print this page

rate 1 star rate 2 star rate 3 star rate 4 star rate 5 star
Your rating: none, Average: 0 (0 votes)

This article have been viewed 2556 times

CHAPTER 22 Managing submandibular glands

Technical steps

Over the last decade, our anesthesia treatment of choice has been intravenous sedation without intubation, paralytic drugs, or general anesthesia. This has proven particularly effective for pre- and subplatysmal fat contouring. However for submandibular gland suspension general anesthesia may be beneficial, at least the first time the procedure is being performed by the surgeon.

A thorough betadine prep of the oral cavity and intraoral administration of local anesthesia is routine. Exposure to the neck is via an inconspicuous 3.5 cm submental incision, in the shadow posterior to the submental skin crease. This provides access to the platysmal plane. Careful pre- and posterior auricular rhytidectomy incisions give access to the face and lateral aspects of the neck. The inferior border of the mandible is in clear view, and this approach provides an avenue for directly visualized lipectomy of the neck.

Ligaments in the neck, analogous to the retaining ligaments in the cheek, help suspend the soft-tissues. The mandibular ligaments affix the overlying skin to the inferior aspect of the mandible, and help to define the anterior aspect of the jowls in the aged face. The thin fascial support in the preauricular region is the platysma-auricular ligament, and attaches the posterosuperior platysma to the skin. Anteriorly, the skin is tethered to the superficial musculoaponeurotic system SMAS and platysma via the anterior platysma–cutaneous ligaments. These ligaments check the descent of the soft-tissues of the neck in aging, and are disrupted to allow for proper redraping of the skin during neck rejuvenation.

Subplatysmal fat contouring

Subplatysmal fat may add significant cervicomental angle convexity. The degree of subplatysmal fat is typically an inherited feature, but is also a reflection of total body fat in certain patients. In a subset of patients, the midline subplatysmal fat is the most prominent visible feature of aging in the cervicofacial area. These patients may benefit from a subplatysmal fat contouring through conservative resection and platysmaplasty alone, requiring only a submental incision. We have found this particularly beneficial in some of our young patients. Although the submental incision provides good exposure medially, the additional aspects of the aging neck in most older patients require lateral approaches as well. Any suction lipectomy of the preplatysmal fat must be done conservatively as over-resection is very easy to do and extremely difficult to repair.

A short scar technique is frequently used if skin elasticity is good as we find the exposure frequently allows us all the access we need.

We usually wait to perform preplatysmal fat excision after the final muscle position is set, as we want to prevent the advancement of fat-excised areas above the mandibular border and onto the face. If this occurs, contour deformities may be apparent on the face.

Elevating the platysma in the vertical midline allows visualization of the deeper subplatysmal fat deposits. Interposed between the platysma and the anterior bellies of the digastric muscles, this fat is conservatively resected with cautery or scissors. Some surgeons feel open or closed liposuction techniques may be useful adjuncts to neck and facelift, but we use them very selectively. Residual fat globules that have already been excised may be removed under direct vision with a flat liposuction cannula with a large single hole, but we prefer to directly contour down the fat with scissors. Some authors recommend the resection of the anterior digastric muscle bellies if residual fullness exists, but we have not used this technique as we feel it may lead to an overdone appearance.

Submandibular gland suspension and resection

Weakened muscular and fascial support of the gland, and subsequent increased glandular ptosis are manifest as submandibular fullness. SMAS plication in rhytidectomy or platysmal suspension may indirectly address this fullness, but these techniques to re-establish fascial support have not proven effective over the long-term. In fact, submandibular gland ptosis often persists after platysmal, cervical fat, and skin laxity surgical objectives have been met. Counter-intuitively, in patients with submandibular gland ptosis, tightening of the overlying tissues may accentuate the deformity. These patients may be candidates for submandibular gland suspension or resection.

As before, the neck is approached through a submental incision. The dissection is continued beneath the platysma, where the submandibular gland has been marked out preoperatively. In this way, the surgeon can obtain direct visualization of the submandibular capsule. A 1.5 cm incision is made in the capsule along the anterior-inferior surface, parallel to the body of the mandible. Careful dissection around the gland releases any inferior or lateral capsular adhesions and results in mobilization of the gland within the capsule. A blunt snap is inserted until the inferior border of the mandible is encountered, and then is advanced along the lingual aspect of the mandibular body in a subperiosteal plane. This is continued until the oral mucosa tents over the tip of the snap. At this point, a 2–3 mm incision is carefully made with a #15 scalpel. The instrument tip is then delivered into the oral cavity and a 2-0 suture end is grasped and brought back out through the neck incision (Fig. 22.2).

A second pass is then performed, also from within the glandular capsule, but lateral to the gland this time. The periosteal tunnel created for this suture is parallel to, but 3 cm anterior to, the initial pass. The opposite end of the free suture is grasped and pulled down into the neck (Fig. 22.3). After both ends of the suture have been retracted caudally, mild traction on the suture ensures adequate purchase of a sling of periosteum to provide support for the gland (Fig. 22.4). This is the zone of periosteal adhesion. The gland is elevated to the level of the posterior belly of the digastric muscle and the inferior border of the mandible with gentle digital pressure. The knot is then cinched, tied, and the gland’s elevated position secured (Fig. 22.5).

After obtaining a durable suspension, the incised glandular capsule is imbricated with permanent suture to bolster the suspension sling inferiorly. Hemostasis is verified and the intraoral incision closed with a chromic suture. The submental and rhytidectomy incisions are closed in layers, with the last being a fine running nylon suture. The incision is cleaned and dressed.

Complications

Complication rates for neck rejuvenation procedures are in general similar to those seen after rhytidectomy. We have found them to be rare. Though we have had postoperative hematomas with our regular rhydidectomies, we have had no postoperative hematomas in our patients with submandibular gland contouring or suspension. We have had intraoperative bleeding in two patients with submandibular gland partial resection contouring, but this was controlled with the use of hemaclips and/or tying off the bleeding vessels. We are extremely cautious about bleeding and make absolutely certain the field is dry before closure, as we feel postoperative bleeding must be avoided. That is why we continue to explore ways to suspend and otherwise address the ptotic glands. We feel the risk of hematoma should not be increased at all with submandibular gland suspension, since the gland and the vessels within the gland are not cut.

The complications, though rare, should be recognized early and treated. This includes draining hematomas as soon as they are recognized. Seromas are treated with drainage or aspiration. Infection is treated with intravenous antibiotic coverage for skin flora and drainage if necessary. We use perioperative antibiotics and have not had infections as a problem. Finally, skin necrosis is extremely rare, but would be managed with topical antibiotics to prevent super-infection.

Pearls & pitfalls

The concept of aesthetic contouring as an indication for resection of the submandibular gland is a controversial topic. The operation is also technically challenging. Critics cite the chance of nerve injury as a prohibitive risk in undertaking resection of the gland. In their infancy, SMAS-rhytidectomy techniques were similarly criticized as harboring too great a risk to the facial nerve. Multiple, independent studies have documented the facial nerve’s course. In refining surgical approaches to facial rejuvenation, these studies have led to SMAS procedures being popularly accepted. Similar studies, delineating the anatomy of the submandibular gland in relation to the surrounding nerves have been done and published yet surprisingly have not resolved the controversies. The nerves in the area of the gland, except for the autonomic plexus, are exterior to the submandibular gland’s capsule. As a result, there are low published complication rates for resection of the submandibular gland. De Pina and Quinta showed in their experience with eight patients, that despite occasionally eschewing the rhytidectomy approach to the gland, and using the direct approach, there were no complications and no salivary fistulas. We too have had no nerve injuries or fistulas using the submental approach.

Suspension of the gland and its attendant capsule may benefit patients with lesser degrees of submandibular gland fullness, but we have not used it in patients with a large amount of ptosis. Patients with profound submandibular gland ptosis may be more appropriate candidates for partial resection. Approaching the submandibular gland from medial to lateral and upon entering the capsule inferiorly allows a caudal approach to the gland which best avoids the marginal mandibular nerve. The submental approach to the gland is technically difficult in part due to limited access. The presence of variant blood supply within the gland and the possibility of postoperative hematomas has led to the greatest criticism of submandibular gland excision. This has concerned us as well and thus we continue to pursue suspension and other methods to treat the ptotic submandibular gland.

Summary of steps

1. Obtain an accurate history and physical examination, including preoperative photos.

2. Pair the correct procedure to the defect to be addressed.

3. Prep the intraoral surfaces with betadine, and perform intraoral nerve blocks of the mandibular nerve.

4. After infiltrating the areas of planned incisions with local anesthetic, perform the lateral pre- and posterior auricular rhytidectomy incisions and the 3.5 cm submental incisions for access to the neck.

5. Submental skin is then undermined inferiorly to the level of the cricoid.

6. The platysma is divided in the midline, and freed from the deeper subplatysmal fat and anterior bellies of the digastric muscles.

7. Subplatysmal fat is resected with scissors to correct the cervicomental convexity.

8. Exposing the submandibular gland, a 1.5 cm incision is made in the capsule along the anterior–inferior surface, and the gland mobilized within the capsule.

9. A blunt snap is advanced along the lingual aspect of the mandibular body in a subperiosteal plane, and through a 2–3 mm incision, is delivered into the oral cavity.

10. A 2-0 suture end is grasped and brought back out through the neck incision.

11. A second pass is then performed, lateral to the gland this time. The opposite end of the free suture is grasped and pulled down into the neck, and tightened to secure the gland in an elevated position.

12. The incised glandular capsule is imbricated with permanent suture to bolster the suspension sling inferiorly.

13. The intraoral incisions are closed with chromic suture.

14. The cut platysmal edges are brought together in the midline, the excess tissue resected, and the edges re-approximated with interrupted or running sutures.

15. The submental and rhytidectomy incisions are closed in layers, with the last being a fine running nylon suture.

16. The incision is cleaned and dressed with a thin layer of bacitracin.

17. Include meticulous hemostasis and avoidance of hypertension postoperatively in an effort to prevent or minimize postoperative complications.

18. Ensure postoperative follow-up and evaluating results critically and honestly.

Further reading

Baker DC. Face lift with submandibular gland and digastric muscle resection: radical neck rhytidectomy. Aesthetic Surg J. 2006;26:85–92.

Codner MC, Nahai F. Submandibular gland I: an anatomic evaluation and surgical approach to submandibular gland resection for facial rejuvenation. Discussion. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2003;112(4):1155–1156.

de Pina DP, Quinta WC. Aesthetic resection of the submandibular salivary gland. Plast Reconstr Surg. 1991;5:779.

Feldman JJ. Corset platysmaplasty. Plast Reconstr Surg. 1990;85:333.

Gardetto A, Dabernig J, Rainer C, Piegger J, Piza-Katzer H, Fritsch H. Does a superficial musculoaponeurotic system exist in the neck? An anatomic study by the tissue plastination technique. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2003;111(2):664–672.

Goddio AS. Skin retraction following suction lipectomy by treatment site: a study of 500 procedures in 458 selected subjects. Plast Reconstr Surg. 1991;87(1):66–75.

Ramirez OM. Comprehensive approach to rejuvenation of the neck. Facial Plast Surg. 2001;17:129.

Singer DP, Sullivan PK. Submandibular gland I: an anatomic evaluation and surgical approach to submandibular gland resection for facial rejuvenation. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2003;112(4):1150–1154.

Sullivan PK, Freeman MB, Schmidt S. Contouring the aging neck with submandibular gland suspension. Aesthet Surg J. 2006;26(4):465–471.

Zins JE, Fardo D. The “anterior-only” approach to neck rejuvenation: an alternative to facelift surgery. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2005;115(6):1761–1768.