Male Genitalia, Hernias, and Rectal Exam

Published on 02/03/2015 by admin

Filed under Internal Medicine

Last modified 22/04/2025

Print this page

rate 1 star rate 2 star rate 3 star rate 4 star rate 5 star
Your rating: none, Average: 0 (0 votes)

This article have been viewed 6774 times

Chapter 16 Male Genitalia, Hernias, and Rectal Exam

A. Male Genitalia

5 What steps should I take to properly examine the penis?

The first, of course, is precautionary: put on a pair of gloves because some sexually transmitted diseases (including syphilis) can be acquired through simple skin abrasions. With gloves on, examine the penis by first palpating the shaft, and then by carefully looking for areas of induration or tenderness. Then, look for unusual curvatures (see Peyronie’s disease, question 47). Retract the prepuce to gain access to the glans, and inspect it for abnormalities. After completing the exam, return the foreskin to its original position since failure to do so may cause severe edema in unconscious patients. Finally, gently compress the glans between your thumb and forefinger to visualize the urethral meatus, and possibly express secretions. Note that this maneuver may be unyielding even in patients with a history of penile discharge. In this case, milk the shaft of the penis (from its base to the glans), since this may produce a few precious drops for analysis. Finally, examine the base of the penis for hair or skin abnormalities.

6 What is priapism?

A fancy term for a protracted erection, usually associated with pain. If we look back at the American presidency, we might conclude that priapism qualifies as a White House occupational hazard, were it not for the fact that this condition is usually not associated with sexual desire. The term “priapism” is actually rooted in Greek mythology, specifically in Priapus, one of the many illegitimate sons of Zeus, King of the Gods (which confirms our suspicion that power and sex may be linked, at least among American presidents and Greek deities). According to tradition, Hera (Zeus’ unfortunate wife) found out about this umpteenth illicit affair of her husband and decided to attend the child’s birth, to cast a mortal spell on the baby. Things, however, did not go as expected, since Priapus was born so well endowed that Hera, taken by surprise, completely missed her chance. Hence, the baby was rushed to safety, and a new medical term was born. Priapism eventually came to signify a condition characterized by chronic, protracted, and painful erections. Still, Priapus also prompted great respect for the penis, which became a symbol not only of fertility, but also of luck, since it had literally saved his owner’s life. From that time on, Romans developed a penchant for wearing little phalluses around their neck, usually made in coral (because of its apotropaic virtue [i.e., the ability to ward off the evil eye]), but occasionally also in gold. They also carved phalluses on buildings—as hopeful lucky charms. For example, the great Roman wall erected (no pun intended) in England by Emperor Hadrian during the 1st century AD was riddled with various penile carvings, still visible today and accurately catalogued in local museums by serious British archeologists. Stone phalluses were supposed to bring good luck to the wall’s defenders but unfortunately fell short of expectations: Hadrian’s wall was pierced by raiding Scots and Picts and eventually abandoned. The reverence for the penis, however, continued unabated throughout the Mediterranean basin. Indeed, in some parts of Italy and Greece (not to mention South Philadelphia) it is still possible to see golden pricklets hanging from people’s necks, a reminder of the long-lasting value of Greek mythology and penile lore.

11 What is phimosis?

From the Greek phimos (muzzle or snout), this is a narrowed opening of the prepuce, so that the foreskin cannot be retracted over the glans penis (Fig. 16-3). Usually congenital (from membranes binding the prepuce to the glans), phimosis also may result from acquired adhesions, often the sequela of poor hygiene, previous infections (chronic balanoposthitis), or a too-forceful retraction of a congenital phimosis. If untreated, it can degenerate into squamous intraepithelial cancer of the penis.

18 What is Reiter’s syndrome? What are its manifestations?

Reiter’s is a reactive arthritis, usually triggered by an infection. This may be sexually transmitted (Chlamydia, genital mycoplasmas, and, to a lesser degree, gonococci) or enteric (Shigella, Salmonella, Yersinia, and Campylobacter spp.). Its clinical manifestations include acute arthritis/arthralgia, lower urogenital tract inflammation, mucocutaneous lesions, and conjunctivitis/iridocyclitis. One quarter of affected men have small, ulcerated plaques around the glans and foreskin. In fact, the most common mucocutaneous lesion involves the penis and is called circinate balanitis (circinata means round in Latin, and balanitis is the Greek term for inflammation of the glans). This is a painless inflammation of glans, sulcus, and corona, which starts as tiny blebs, eventually merging into a larger ring of inflammatory tissue that may completely circumscribe the glans. In addition, Reiter’s patients often have mucocutaneous lesions of the mouth, palms, and soles. Over the hands and feet, these tend to be scaly, sometimes pustular, and frequently resembling severe psoriasis (keratoderma blennorrhagica). Whether initial infection was sexually transmitted or enteric, there also may be urethritis with discharge. This is scanty, thin, and whitish—hence, quite different from the profuse, thicker, and more purulent discharge of gonorrhea. In fact, the discharge of Reiter’s resembles that of other nongonococcal urethritides (like chlamydia) insofar as it is usually clear. Acute Reiter’s also can present with systemic symptoms (fever, malaise, anorexia, and weight loss). Most cases resolve in 2–6 months with annual risk of recurrence of mucocutaneous manifestations around 15%, at intervals of months or years. The arthritis is usually persistent.

36 Describe penile papules. What are the most important lesions of this sort?

Papules are usually benign, although a few are infectious and some are early and preulcerating cancers.

40 And what about genital warts?

These also are quite common, and in fact increasing in prevalence, especially in young and sexually active people. Condylomata acuminata are arbor-like (acuminata) lesions caused by the human papillomavirus virus (the condylomata lata of syphilis are instead flat—see question 41). Usually more wart-like than ulcerating, condylomata acuminata usually occur in moist areas (such as the corona or sulcus), but also may affect the penis’s tip and shaft, plus scrotum, anus, and mouth. They appear as tiny and skin-colored genital warts, isolated or in clusters, and with a shiny surface. These may become fleshy and cauliflower-like. Highly infectious, genital warts can be latent, subclinical, and clinical—very much like herpes. Hence, asymptomatic infection (and shedding) is frequent. The most common agents are low-risk human papillomavirus (HPV) 6 and 11; high-risk HPV types 16 and 18 are less common but are associated with premalignant and malignant degeneration (i.e., squamous cell carcinoma of the penis, anus, and cervix). They may be confused with pearly penile papules.

42 What about penile plaques?

They are usually benign (like psoriasis and Zoon’s plasma cell balanitis) and often infectious (balanitis and posthitis, see questions 1517). Still, three of these lesions (erythroplasia of Queyrat, lichen sclerosus, and balanitis xerotica obliterans) are quite serious since they may degenerate into penile cancer. Finally, diffuse red plaques with a poorly defined edge and finely scaled surface (eczema-like) may be due to allergic contact dermatitis. Although often the result of lubricants, condoms, spermicides, and feminine deodorant sprays, they are more frequently caused by poor hygiene, with persistent moisture and maceration. They are quite irritating and usually respond to topical steroids.

55 What is a varicocele?

A condition caused by incompetent valves in the internal spermatic veins, resulting in engorgement along the spermatic cord. Hence, a varicocele resembles a nest of worms, which only presents upon standing and resolves with either a supine position or scrotal elevation. Easily identifiable on exam, a varicocele is quite common, occurring in 15% of the general male population and 40% of men evaluated for infertility. It is, in fact, a common cause of reversible sterility (due to the increased testicular temperature of the affected testis). This was intuited by the first century A.D. Roman physician Celsus, who described the condition as “veins that are swollen and twisted over the testicle, which thus becomes smaller than its fellow inasmuch as its nutrition has become defective.” Note that because of the drainage characteristics of the testicular veins, a varicocele is much more common on the left than on the right. Accordingly, a right varicocele should prompt investigation to exclude either anatomic abnormalities or an alternative diagnosis. Other than a varicocele, localized and painless scrotal swelling usually reflects pathology of the testis or epididymis (see questions 63 and 64). Conversely, painful and tender scrotal swelling usually indicates a much more acute process, such as torsion of the spermatic cord, strangulated inguinal hernia, acute orchitis, or acute epididymitis.

57 How should the testes and epididymides be examined?

With great care, since these organs (especially the testes) are exquisitely sensitive, not only to touch but also to temperature. In fact, in a cold room they may even retract toward the inguinal canal. Hence, to best palpate them, use your thumb plus index finger, or thumb plus index and medium fingers. This also allows you to gauge the length and thickness of each testicle, although for more accurate measurements, you will need a caliper. Note any discrepancy in consistency or size, and, if present, ask how long this has been so. If ruling out a congenitally undescended testis, examine the inguinal canal for localized swelling. Search for testicular lumps or bumps, which, if present, should be considered neoplastic until proven otherwise. Still, keep in mind that diffuse testicular enlargement usually reflects either a hydrocele (see question 59) or a varicocele (previously discussed, see question 55). Note that the left testis lies a bit lower in the scrotum than its counterpart (the reverse would suggests situs inversus). Also note that, although the testicles can be examined in either the standing or supine position, a search for hernias or varicoceles requires the patient to stand. Finally, move cephalad and gently assess the upper and posterior poles of the testes and adjacent heads of the epididymides. Examine the spermatic cord, which goes from the epididymis all the way up into the inguinal canal. This contains the vas deferens, the testicular artery/vein, the ilioinguinal nerve, plus lymphatic vessels and fat tissue. Of all these structures, only the vas can be easily recognized, based on its firm and wire-like feel and the location along the posterior aspect of the bundle. Identify any lumps or bumps in the cord, and then note their relationship to the testes and inguinal canal. Note that a varicocele will be palpable not only in the testes, but also throughout the length of the cord, since it represents a varicose dilation of the spermatic vein.

B. Hernia Examination

65 What are the two possible sites of groin hernias?

image

Figure 16-5 Sites of hernias in the groin.

(Adapted from Swartz MH: Pocket Companion to Textbook of Physical Diagnosis. Philadelphia, WB Saunders, 1995.)

66 What is the best way to detect a hernia?

Start with inspection. Ask the patient to stand while you comfortably sit in a chair. Observe the external inguinal ring, looking for a localized bulge. If not visible, elicit the bulge by asking the patient to either cough or perform a Valsalva maneuver. After inspection, palpate the patient’s right inguinal region with your right index finger and the patient’s left inguinal region with your left index finger. Gently insert the finger along the spermatic cord, through the invaginated scrotum (Fig. 16-6), aiming for the external ring of the inguinal canal (from where the cord emerges). As your fingertip reaches into the external ring, put the fingers of your opposite hand over the inguinal canal, or over any noticeably swollen area. Ask the patient to cough or strain and see whether you can feel, with either hand, any bulging/impulse suggestive of hernia.

image

Figure 16-6 Examination of the inguinal floor by insertion of a finger through the invaginated upper scrotum.

(From James EC, Corry RJ, Perry JF: Basic Surgical Practice. Philadelphia, Hanley & Belfus, 1987.)

C. Digital Rectal Examination (DRE)

76 What are the steps to follow in a rectal exam?

If you elect to have the patient standing, instruct him to turn around and rest his chest on the exam table. This will ease both the examiner’s and examinee’s job. Then sit down, put on gloves, and gently spread the patient’s buttocks. Evaluate the perianal area, and look for any skin abnormalities. Having done so, adequately lubricate your index finger and tell the patient that pretty soon you will be inserting it into his rectum. Place your finger against the anus and ask the patient to bear down as if he were having a bowel movement. This will relax the sphincter and allow you to insert the finger more easily. Aim your index finger toward the patient’s umbilicus, enter through the anus, and assess its sphincter tone. Palpate the prostate gland through the wall of the rectum. Using the palmar aspect of your index finger, you will be able to examine the posterior and lateral aspects of the gland, but not its anterior surface since this is inaccessible. Then, advance your index finger as far (and as gently) as you can toward the umbilicus, aiming for the seminal vesicles. These are usually not palpable, unless there is disease. Once you have done so, rotate your finger in order to reach upward, posteriorly, and laterally for rectal-based masses or lesions. Then withdraw and inspect the stool on your gloved finger for any evidence of mucus, blood, or tarry color (which would indicate a bleeding site above the ligament of Treitz, whereas obvious blood would point instead to rectal or anal sources). Afterwards, dab some of the stool on a guaiac card, and test it for occult blood. Finally, hand the patient a box of tissues for cleaning.

Selected Bibliography

1 Akhtar AJ, Moran D, Ganeson K, et al. Safety and efficacy of digital rectal examination in patients with acute myocardial infarction. Am J Gastroenterol. 2000;95:1463-1465.

2 Buechner SA. Common skin disorders of the penis. BJU Int. 2002;90:498-506.

3 DeGowin RL. DeGowin and DeGowin’s Bedside Diagnostic Examination, 6th ed. New York: McGraw-Hill, 1994.

4 Edwards S. Balanitis and balanoposthitis: A review. Genitourin Med. 1996;72:155-159.

5 Gairdner D. The fate of the foreskin: A study of circumcision. BMJ. 1949;2:1433-1437.

6 Gerber GS. Carcinoma in situ of the penis. J Urol. 1994;151:829-833.

7 Guinan P, Bush I, Ray, V, et al. The accuracy of the rectal examination in the diagnosis of prostatic carcinoma. N Engl J Med. 1980;303:499-583.

8 Hennigan TW, Franks PJ, Hocken DB, Allen-Mersh TG. Rectal examination in general practice. BMJ. 1990;301:478-480.

9 Hoogendam A, Buntinx F, de Vet HC. The diagnostic value of digital rectal examination in primary care screening for prostate cancer: A meta-analysis. Fam Pract. 1999;16:621-626.

10 Imamura E. Phimosis of infants and young children in Japan. Acta Paediatr Jpn. 1997;39:403-405.

11 Oster J. Further fate of the foreskin: Incidence of preputial adhesions, phimosis, and smegma among Danish schoolboys. Arch Dis Child. 1968;43:200-203.

12 Sapira JD. The Art and Science of Bedside Diagnosis. Baltimore: Urban & Schwarzenberg, 1990.

13 Singhal VK, Razdan JL, Gupta, SN, et al. Carcinoma of the penis. J Ind Med Assoc. 1991;89:120-123.

14 Willms JL, Schneidermann H, Algranati PS. Physical Diagnosis. Baltimore: Williams & Wilkins, 1994.