Magnetic Resonance Imaging of the Hip Joint

Published on 11/04/2015 by admin

Filed under Orthopaedics

Last modified 11/04/2015

Print this page

rate 1 star rate 2 star rate 3 star rate 4 star rate 5 star
Your rating: none, Average: 0 (0 votes)

This article have been viewed 2641 times

CHAPTER 4 Magnetic Resonance Imaging of the Hip Joint

Introduction

For years, classic magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) has been performed in three planes to identify hip pathologies such as avascular necrosis, loose bodies, and labral pathologies. Recently, there has been a need for more information to help diagnose the early stages of osteoarthritis, which are not well visible on standard radiographs or with MRI. Magnetic resonance arthrography (MRA) of the hip has been used with increasing frequency to identify pathomorphologies of the hip such as femoroacetabular impingement (FAI) or developmental dysplasia of the hip (DDH). For these conditions, plain radiographs give insufficient information about cartilage, labral, and even osseous abnormalities. MRA has been used since 1992 at our institution for the visualization of the acetabular labrum and the articular cartilage, especially for patients with FAI and DDH. During the past decade, various modifications of our MRA technique have been implemented, and these have led to considerable improvements in our ability to visualize pathologic changes of the hip.

MRA is a minimally invasive method of assessing the extent of cartilage damage, which has numerous implications for both the surgeon and the patient. Knowing the extent of damage—particularly of the cartilage—is essential in helping the surgeon to determine the correct surgical strategy (i.e., to preserve or replace the joint). Moreover, it provides detailed preoperative information so that the surgeon can inform the patient about potential long-term outcomes of a surgical procedure. In this chapter, we explain our current technique of 1.5-T MRA of the hip, and we demonstrate some of the findings and their interpretations with regard to bone, cartilage, labral, and capsular tissue in patients with FAI. Given the fact that the current protocols of 1.5-T scanners have limitations, we will also present more recent technologic advances in MRI: 3 T16 and dGEMRIC biochemical imaging of the hip.

1 5-T Morphologic imaging

During the past 15 years, we examined approximately 3500 hips with the use of MRA. The MRA technique was constantly refined during this time. Our 1.5-T protocol is the result of a close collaboration between radiologists (SW) and surgeons (RG and ML).

Examination Protocol

All patients are examined with the use of a Siemens Vision and Avanto 1.5-T, or Trio 3T high-field scanner (Erlangen, Germany). A flexible surface coil is used exclusively for high spatial resolution and signal-to-noise ratio. Before the MRA examination, all patients receive an intra-articular injection of 10 mL to 20 mL of saline-diluted Gd-DOTA 0.0025 mmolGd/mL (ArtiremR, Guerbert AG, Paris) into the hip joint with the use of fluoroscopic guidance. Patients are positioned supine under a C-arm, and the hip is placed slightly in external rotation to relax the anterior capsule. After the disinfection and sterile draping of the injection site, the injection is performed with a 22-gauge, spinal, obtuse-cut–angle needle, which helps to prevent injection into the capsular tissue or any extravasation. Between the injection and MR examination, a maximum time allowance of 10 minutes is preferred. The patients are then positioned supine, and the lower extremities are fixed with 20 degrees of internal rotation to prevent motion during scanning, to generate a standard version of the femoral neck, and to control the position of the pelvis.

After a short localizer in three planes, the examination continues with an axial T1-weighted sequence (repetition time [TR] 650, echo time [TE] 20, 200 mm × 200 mm field of view, 224 × 512 matrix, 4-mm section thickness with a 0.2-mm section gap, 17 slices, 3 minutes and 44 seconds). The sequence is centered on the femoral head, and it covers the whole joint (Figure 4-1).

The second sequence is an axial FLASH sequence with a few thin slices that is centered on the upper joint space. This sequence is used to evaluate the version of the acetabulum, and it also helps with the assessment for subcortical hypersclerosis of the rim as well as for the presence of synovial cysts (TR 550, TE 10, flip angle of 90 degrees, 120 mm × 120 mm field of view, 256 × 256 matrix, 2-mm section thickness with a 0.1-mm section gap, 11 slices, 3 minutes and 6 seconds; Figure 4-2).

Next is a coronal–oblique proton-density l–weighted (PDW) thin-slice sequence (TR 3200, TE 15, 120 mm × 120 mm field of view, 256 × 256 matrix, 2-mm section thickness with a 0.1-mm section gap, 23 slices, 5 minutes). This sequence is aligned perpendicular to the femoral neck, and it is marked on the axial T1W sequence (Figure 4-3).

A second PDW sequence in the sagittal direction (TR 3200, TE 15, 120 mm × 120 mm field of view, 256 × 256 matrix, 2-mm section thickness with a 0.2-mm section gap, 23 slices, 5 minutes and 37 seconds) is applied as the next step (Figure 4-4).

Finally, a radial PDW sequence (Figure 4-5) is used in which all slices are oriented basically orthogonal to the acetabular rim and labrum. This sequence is based on a sagittal oblique localizer, which is marked on the PDW coronal sequence, and it runs parallel with the sagittal oblique course of the acetabulum. The MRA imaging parameters are as follows: TR 2000, TE 15, 260 mm × 260 mm field of view, 266 × 512 matrix, 4-mm section thickness, 16 slices, 4 minutes and 43 seconds. In the center of the radial sequence, where the slices cross over, the signal wipes out. This produces a broad line without signal on the image, which affects the quality of the image. The more slices in a sequence, the broader the no-signal line gets. To reduce this artifact, this sequence is split into two sequences of eight slices each. The whole examination, including the hip injection, lasts about 50 to 60 minutes.

Interpretation and Findings

There are numerous methods that address how best to interpret MR images of the hip. We prefer to look first at the bony structures, beginning with the acetabulum, and we then proceed to the soft-tissue structures.

Osseous structures

Normally, the acetabulum has an anteversion of between 14 and 26.5 degrees (men: 18.5 ± 4.5 degrees; women: 21.5 ± 5 degrees). To determine the version, we use the axial FLASH sequence with few but very thin (2-mm) slices. Because acetabular version in the cranial third of the acetabulum contributes to the development of osteoarthritis of the hip, we measure the version at the superior portion of the acetabulum and use the first slice, where the anterior rim can be differentiated from the posterior. When a retroversion is present (e.g., in a conventional radiograph of the pelvis), the posterior acetabular rim lies laterally to the anterior rim at the uppermost part of the hip.

Further caudally, all acetabuli have an anteversion. The angle of version is measured and mentioned in the report. We then look for signs of hypersclerosis of the subchondral bone in the FLASH sequence but also in all other sequences as a very hypointense subcortical signal. If this is present, it is a sign of overload. We also note whether ganglia are present at the subchondral bone; this is also a sign of overload. These cyst formations are of various diameters, from a few millimeters to several centimeters. Because they contain fluid or synovia, they have a bright signal intensity in the FLASH and PDW sequences, and they are hypointense in the T1W sequence. They are mostly located at the superomedial area and next to the rim of the acetabulum. Occasionally, one can see a tiny channel of connection with the joint.

For patients with a local or global overcoverage, one can observe a bone apposition at the rim, often anterolaterally but also posteriorly, where impingement takes place. We believe that this is a bony reaction to repetitive microtrauma, and it can be seen on a standard radiograph as a double line. This “osteophyte” is obtuse or sharp at the edge, and it is broad based. The labrum becomes thinned in this area, and, in some cases, it fully disappears. The latter observation gives the false interpretation of an ossification of the labrum.

Buy Membership for Orthopaedics Category to continue reading. Learn more here