MACS facelift

Published on 22/05/2015 by admin

Filed under Plastic Reconstructive Surgery

Last modified 22/04/2025

Print this page

rate 1 star rate 2 star rate 3 star rate 4 star rate 5 star
Your rating: none, Average: 0 (0 votes)

This article have been viewed 5978 times

CHAPTER 12 MACS facelift

Indications

The appeal of the MACS-lift is that it offers stable, natural facial rejuvenation with a simple, safe procedure lasting 2 to image hours, under local anesthesia as an outpatient. In comparison to a traditional facelift, the MACS-lift involves a shorter scar, lower morbidity and a quicker recovery time.

The general principle of a MACS-lift is the vertical re-suspension of sagging facial soft tissues with permanent or slowly resorbable purse-string sutures, anchored to the deep temporal fascia through pre-auricular and temporal hairline incisions.

Two variations of the procedure are described:

Extended MACS-lift

An additional point 2 cm below the lateral canthus is marked preoperatively with the patient sitting. This is the inferior limit of the third purse string suture and is included in the skin undermining. This suture also originates from the deep temporal fascia, but at its anterior aspect, lateral to the orbital rim. It provides strong correction of the nasolabial fold, enhancement of the malar region, lifting of the midface and shortening of the vertical height of the lower eyelid (Fig. 12.1).

In both the S-MACS and X-MACS the skin is redraped in a completely vertical direction and skin excess above the temporal hairline incision is resected. As there is no lateral traction on the skin, there is no dog ear at the level of the earlobe, eliminating the need for a post-auricular extension of the incision (Fig. 12.2).

In an extended MACS lift, suspending the malar fat pad causes bunching of skin in the lateral part of the lower eyelid and the paracanthal zone and further skin excision in this region is necessary. This skin resection is safe because of the support on the lower eyelid provided by the third purse string suture. This led to the development of the pinch blepharoplasty: skin excess is evaluated by pinching with forceps and is excised via a lower eyelid blepharoplasty incision combined with a paracanthal extension. Between four to eight millimeters of skin can be safely resected.

The MACS-lift achieves powerful improvement in submental and upper neck laxity, sharpening of a blunted submental angle, jaw line definition, restoration of mid facial volume and correction of the nasolabial fold.

Whether to perform a simple or extended MACS-lift is determined primarily by whether the patient needs correction of the upper half of the nasolabial fold and the midface. The third suture, suspending the malar fat pad, offers powerful correction of these features. It also enhances the volumetric restoration of the midface and provides structural support of the lower eyelid. This means that a third suture can also be indicated in patients with a flattened malar mound and laxity of the lower eyelids.

Only patients with no major medical problems or cardiovascular risk factors are selected for this outpatient office-based surgery. The decision whether to perform a MACS-lift under local or general anesthesia depends on both the surgeon’s and patient’s preference.

In classical teaching, smoking is considered an absolute contraindication to facelift surgery. As a result of the limited subcutaneous undermining and the absence of multiplanar dissection, we only consider smoking a relative contraindication to performing a MACS-lift.

Technical steps

Preoperative marking: incision

See Fig. 12.1, red line.

Marking starts at the lower limit of the lobule, progressing upwards in the pre-auricular crease. At the level of the incisura intertragica a 90° backwards turn is made to preserve the integrity of this anatomical landmark. The marking then follows the posterior edge of the tragus, heading towards the helical root.

At the superior limit of the ear the marking follows the small hairless recess between the sideburn and the auricle and then turns downwards to follow the inferior edge of the sideburn. In men, the marking descends approximately 1.5 cm before crossing anteriorly.

It continues forwards in a zigzag pattern, 2 mm within the lower and anterior aspect of the sideburn. In this part of the incision the knife is beveled at an angle almost tangential with the skin, cutting hair shafts perpendicularly (Fig. 12.3). This maneuver allows hairs to grow through the scar. After hair regrowth the scar will be hidden within the hairline and becomes virtually invisible. The purpose of the zigzag is to increase the length of the temporal incision making it a similar length to the cheek flap, reducing potential dog ear formation.

In the simple MACS-lift the incision extends to the level of the lateral canthus. In an extended MACS-lift the incision continues to the level of the tail of the eyebrow.

Skin redraping and resection

One of the most important features in this short scar facelift is the vertical redraping of the skin. As the vector of the SMAS suspension is almost completely vertical, redraping and excision of skin in the same direction reinforces the underlying subcutaneous sculpturing effect.

Classically in facelift surgery there is always a horizontal component to the skin redraping. This causes skin redundancy around the earlobe, requiring a post auricular extension of the incision (Fig. 12.9, Fig. 12.10B).

Skin resection on the cheek flap is carried out in a curvilinear fashion. The zigzag border of the temporal hairline incision expands to incorporate this linear cheek flap, compensating for any incongruity and reducing possible dog ear formation. The earlobe is then set back into the cheek flap (Fig. 12.2).

Closure is with buried interrupted 4-0 Vicryl® sutures.

The horizontal limb of the incision is then closed with a running 5-0 nylon horizontal mattress suture, taking larger bites on the cheek flap to adjust for any difference in length.

A small hollow silicone drain is placed at the lowest point of the incision. This discharges into the loose postauricular dressings during the first 24 hours, after which both are removed.

The remainder of the wound is closed with interrupted 6-0 nylon sutures.

In cases where a short-scar temporal lift is added (see below), skin resection is postponed. The temporal lift corrects some of the excess paracanthal skin, reducing dog ear formation at the hairline incision.

The short-scar temporal lift

In most vertical facelifts, including the midface lift, skin excess may appear in the paracanthal region. This may accentuate pre-existing temporal hooding. The short-scar temporal lift with galeapexy, described by Alain Fogli is a useful solution to this problem.

We have had great success using this technique, adding some modifications in the planes of undermining and the vector of skin redraping.

The principle involves subcutaneous lifting of the lateral third of the eyebrow, using the galea as a vehicle and an anchor for the forehead skin. The dissection is subgaleal in the cranial part, and subcutaneous in the caudal part. The transition from the subgaleal to the subcutaneous plane lies at least 2 cm above the tail of the eyebrow, to protect the frontal branch of the facial nerve.

Results

Case 1 (side and frontal view)

This 45-year-old woman presented complaining of her “harsh” stare, loss of volume in the lower half of her face and mild laxity in her upper neck and submental region. On examination she has moderate jowling, early submental laxity without platysmal bands, marionette grooves (mainly visible on profile), with emptiness of the midface and cheeks. There is moderate herniation of the lower eyelid orbital fat, and an upper eyelid dermatochalasis with the loose skin resting on the upper eyelashes, and herniation of the medial fat pad. The position of the eyebrows is satisfactory. Also observe the glabellar frown line.

Treatment consisted of:

This was performed under local anesthesia with intramuscular midazolam sedation (3 mg) and took 2 hours. The patient was discharged home 2 hours after the completion of surgery.

The postoperative result one year later is shown. The frontal view demonstrates restoration of the lower facial shape, with a well-defined mandibular border, correction of the jowls, the marionette grooves and replenishment of the cheek volume. The herniation of lower eyelid fat has been corrected. Note the absence of upper eyelid dermatochalasis and the smooth glabella.

On profile, the flat submental area, the well-defined mandibular border and the sharp cervicomental angle are also obvious. Note the good scar quality and the natural temporal hairline.

Case 4 (frontal and image view)

This 49-year-old man requested facial rejuvenation. He presents with thick heavy skin and generalized facial ptosis. He has some fatty infiltration of the submental area and ptotic jowls. He also has deep nasolabial grooves and heavy overlying folds. The midface has descended and there is a distinct crease between the cheek and lower eyelid, which bulges from the eyelashes to the infraorbital rim. The upper eyelids are hollow and the eyebrow is heavy and low set. The tail of the eyebrow has dropped causing lateral crowding with two to three deep horizontal creases in the lateral area. The patient also has deep frontal wrinkles.

Surgical treatment consisted of:

This procedure was done under local anesthesia with intramuscular midazolam (4.5 mg) and took 2 hours 40 minutes. The patient was discharged 2 hours following surgery.

The patient is shown 9 months later. He illustrates correction of the cervicomental angle, definition of the mandibular border, improvement of the jowls, with suspension of the submandibular glands by vertical tightening of the platysma muscle. The nasolabial groove has been reduced and the midface shows almost complete eradication of the lid-cheek junction. The malar volume is enhanced and this effect can be best appreciated on the image view. In this, the effect of the temporal lift can also be seen. The tail of the eyebrow has been raised about 1 cm but the beard and sideburn remain in an anatomical position. Note the quality of the 4 cm horizontal scar from the temporal lift.

Case 5 (frontal and image view)

This 53-year-old woman is seeking minimally invasive facial rejuvenation. She wears her hair short and does not want any scars behind her ears. Clinical examination reveals laxity in the neck with platysmal bands, jowls, marionette grooves, fine perioral rhytids on thin lips, a marked nasolabial fold and an empty deflated midface with obvious demarcation between the lid–cheek junction. She also requested correction of her nasal hump and hanging columella.

Treatment consisted of:

The surgery was performed under general anesthesia and took 3 hours. The patient remained overnight and was discharged the following day.

The postoperative results are shown image years after surgery. There is correction of the cervicomental angle, the jowls, marionette grooves and nasolabial folds, with an obvious improvement in the midface. This is most obvious in the image view where the flat zygomatic area has been transformed into a youthful malar prominence. There is blending of the lid–cheek junction. The upper and lower lips have been naturally augmented and the fine rhytids have been eradicated by the laser treatment. The rhinoplasty has had a complementary effect on the rejuvenating surgery. Microfat grafting has produced the additional augmentation necessary in this thin deflated patient. This cannot be achieved by classical facelift procedures alone.

Summary/conclusions

The MACS-lift is a simple and safe short scar facelift technique for the lower and middle third of the face. It produces natural results with minimal face-lift stigmata as a result of the pure vertical vector of action and absence of any lateral tension. It can be performed under local anesthesia and takes on average 2 to 2.5 hours. The power of the procedure can be enhanced through synergistic combination with other minimally invasive rejuvenation techniques such as the short scar temporal lift, laser resurfacing or microfat grafting. In comparison to more aggressive procedures, there is reduced recovery time and morbidity. The results appear to be as stable as other classically described techniques.

Pearls & pitfalls

Further reading

Aston SJ, Bernard RW, Casson PR, Klatsky SA. Secondary face lift. Panel Discussion. Aesthet Surg J. 2002;22:277–283.

Baker D, Massiha H, Nahai F, Tonnard PL. Short scar face lift. Panel Discussion. Aesthet Surg J. 2005;25:607–617.

Baker DC, Hamra ST, Owsley JQ, Ramirez OM. Ten year follow-up on the twin study. Panel presented at Annual Meeting of the American Society for Aesthetic Plastic Surgery; April 2005, New Orleans, Louisiana.

Besins T. The “RARE” technique (reverse and repositioning effect): The renaissance of the aging face and neck. Aesthet Plast Surg. 2004;28(3):127–142.

Camirand A, Doucet J. A comparison between parallel hairline incisions and perpendicular incisions when performing a face lift. Plast Reconstr Surg. 1997;99:10–15.

Coleman SR. Structural fat grafting: more than permanent filler. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2006;118:108S–120S.

Coleman SR. Structural fat grafting. St Louis: Quality Medical Publishing; 2004. 29–57

Connell BF, Semlacher RA. Contemporary deep layer facial rejuvenation. Plast Reconstr Surg. 1997;100:1513–1523.

Feldman JJ. Neck lift. St Louis: Quality Medical Publishing; 2006.

Fogli A. Temporal lift by galeopexy. A review of 270 cases. Aesthet Plast Surg. 2003;27(3):159–165.

Gonzàlez-Ulloa M, Flores ES. Senility of the face: Basic study to understand its causes and effects. Plast Reconstr Surg. 1965;36:239–246.

Isse NG. Endoscopic forehead lift: Evolution and update. Clin Plast Surg. 1995;22:661.

Labbé D, Franco RG, Nicolas J. Platysma suspension and platysmaplasty during neck lift: Anatomical study and analysis of thirty cases. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2006;117:2001–2009.

Matarasso A, Hutchinson O. Evaluating rejuvenation of the forehead and brow: An algorithm for selecting the appropriate technique (follow up). Plast Reconstr Surg. 2003;112:1467.

Paul MD, Calvert JW, Evans G. The evolution of the midface lift in aesthetic plastic surgery. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2006;117:1809–1827.

Pessa JE. An algorithm of facial aging: Verification of Lambros’ theory by three-dimensional stereolithography, with reference to the pathogenesis of midfacial aging, scleral show, and the lateral suborbital trough deformity. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2000;106(2):479–488.

Singer D, Sullivan P. Submandibular gland I: An anatomic evaluation and surgical approach to submandibular gland resection for facial rejuvenation. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2003;112:1150–1154.

Tonnard PL, Verpaele A, et al. 300 MACS-lift short scar rhytidectomies: Analysis of results and complications. Eur J Plast Surg. 2005;28:198–205.

Tonnard PL, Verpaele A. Optimizing results from minimal access cranial suspension lifting (MACS-lift). Aesthet Plast Surg. 2005;29:213–220.

Tonnard PL, Verpaele A. The MACS-lift short scar rhytidectomy. St Louis: Quality Medical Publishing; 2004.

Verpaele A, Tonnard PL, Pirayesh A, Guerao FP, Gaia S. The third suture in MACS-lifting: Making midface lifting simple and safe. JPRAS. 2007;60:1287–1295.